Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1981 Dec;65(12):859–865. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.12.859

Sorsby's pseudoinflammatory macular dystrophy.

A Hoskin, K Sehmi, A C Bird
PMCID: PMC1039695  PMID: 7317334

Abstract

Forty-three additional members of a family described originally by Sorsby and Mason have been examined in order to typify pseudoinflammatory macular dystrophy more accurately. Six new affected members were identified by history alone and a further 7 were examined. Vision is lost from disciform macular degeneration generally during the 5th decade of life. Thereafter peripheral degeneration occurs in some affected members. Before loss of vision the fundus changes include fine drusen-like deposits at the level of Bruch's membrane, angioid streaks, and plaque-like deposits of yellow subretinal material in the macular region. These changes are different from those seen in dominant drusen.

Full text

PDF
862

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHTON N., SORSBY A. Fundus dystrophy with unusual features; a histological study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1951 Dec;35(12):751–764. doi: 10.1136/bjo.35.12.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arden G. B., Carter R. M., Hogg C., Siegel I. M., Margolis S. A gold foil electrode: extending the horizons for clinical electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979 Apr;18(4):421–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BURN R. A. Further cases of a fundus dystrophy with unusual features. Br J Ophthalmol. 1950 Jul;34(7):393–403. doi: 10.1136/bjo.34.7.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deutman A. F., Jansen L. M. Dominantly inherited drusen of Bruch's membrane. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970 Jun;54(6):373–382. doi: 10.1136/bjo.54.6.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser H. B., Wallace D. C. Sorsby's familial pseudo-inflammatory macular dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Jun;71(6):1216–1220. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(71)90965-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gass J. D. Drusen and disciform macular detachment and degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973 Sep;90(3):206–217. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1973.01000050208006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearce W. G. Hereditary macular dystrophy. A clinical and genetic study of two specific forms. Can J Ophthalmol. 1975 Jul;10(3):319–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosen E. S., Leighton D. Fluorescein photography of generalized dominant fundus dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968 Nov;52(11):828–832. doi: 10.1136/bjo.52.11.828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SORSBY A., DAVEY J. B. Dominant macular dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1955 Jul;39(7):385–397. doi: 10.1136/bjo.39.7.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SORSBY A., MASON M. E. J. A fundus dystrophy with unusual features. Br J Ophthalmol. 1949 Feb;33(2):67–97. doi: 10.1136/bjo.33.2.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sarks S. H. Council Lecture. Drusen and their relationship to senile macular degeneration. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1980 May;8(2):117–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1980.tb01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES