Abstract
Recombinant cytokine products have emerged as a promising avenue in cancer therapy due to their capacity to modulate and enhance the immune response against tumors. However, their clinical application is significantly hindered by systemic toxicities already at low doses, thus preventing escalation to therapeutically active regimens. One promising approach to overcoming these limitations is using antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (also called immunocytokines). These biopharmaceuticals leverage the targeting specificity of antibodies to deliver cytokines directly to the tumor microenvironment, thereby reducing systemic exposure and enhancing the therapeutic index. This review comprehensively examines the development and potential of antibody-cytokine fusion proteins in cancer therapy. It explores the molecular characteristics that influence the performance of these fusion proteins, and it highlights key findings from preclinical and clinical studies, illustrating the potential of immunocytokines to improve treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Recent advancements in the field, such as novel engineering strategies and combination strategies to enhance the efficacy and safety of immunocytokines, are also discussed. These innovations offer new opportunities to optimize this class of biotherapeutics, making them a more viable and effective option for cancer treatment. As the field continues to evolve, understanding the critical factors that influence the performance of immunocytokines will be essential for successfully translating these therapies into clinical practice.
Keywords: antibody-cytokine fusion proteins, cancer therapy, activity on demand, dual-cytokine products
Cytokines and Their Potential for Cancer Therapy
Cytokines are small regulatory proteins, which are crucial for modulating the activity of the immune system. These polypeptides are generally secreted by immune cells such as macrophages, B lymphocytes, and T lymphocytes, as well as stromal cells and endothelial cells under specific conditions. Cytokines primarily act via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms by binding with high specificity and affinity to cognate receptors on target cells. This interaction may trigger signaling cascades that influence immune responses, cell maturation, migration, and death.1
In the context of cancer, cytokines may contribute to both tumor suppression and tumor progression. For example, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) enhance immune surveillance and boost anti-tumor responses by stimulating T-cells and natural killer cells.2 By contrast, cytokines secreted by tumor cells and stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), may drive progression by promoting tumor cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, and metastasis.3 Considering their involvement in numerous physiological and pathological conditions, cytokines have been investigated as standalone therapies and as targets for blocking agents.
Interleukin-2 marked a significant chapter in the history of cancer immunotherapy. Originally identified in the late 1970s for its potent ability to stimulate the growth of T-cells, it was rapidly investigated as a therapeutic agent.4 IL-2 is naturally produced by activated T cells and promotes the proliferation and activation of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. The biological activity of IL-2 is mediated through the interaction with its cognate receptor (IL2R), which can be expressed as a high-affinity trimeric form composed of α (CD25), β (CD122), and γ (CD132) chains or as a low-affinity dimeric form with only the β and γ chains. The high-affinity IL2R is predominantly expressed on regulatory T cells (Tregs) and activated T cells. By contrast, the low-affinity receptor is typically found on resting T cells and most NK cells.5,6 FDA approval of recombinant IL2 (Proleukin®) was granted in 1992 for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma and later extended in 1998 for metastatic melanoma.7–9 Proleukin is typically administered at 600,000 to 720,000 IU/kg as i.v. bolus every 8 hours for 14 consecutive doses over 5 days. Despite the high-dose treatment, IL-2 therapy has resulted in durable and long-lasting antitumor responses in only a subset of patients, and its broader application is limited by severe side effects such as vascular leak syndrome and cytokine release syndrome.8,10
Interferon-alpha (IFNα) is a type I interferon predominantly produced by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and is secreted in response to pathogenic or tumor-derived signals. Its mechanism involves binding to the interferon-alpha/beta receptor (IFNAR), which activates the JAK-STAT signaling pathway.1 This cascade promotes the phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT2, leading to the transcription of genes that enhance immune surveillance and exhibit direct antitumor effects by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis.11,12 Recombinant IFNα (Intron A® and Roferon-A®) has been used to treat several cancers, including melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and hairy cell leukemia. For example, in melanoma, IFNα is given as an adjuvant therapy at high doses (20 MIU/m²) following tumor resection to reduce the risk of recurrence.13 Nevertheless, the therapeutic use of IFNα is often limited by significant adverse effects such as flu-like symptoms, fatigue, and bone marrow suppression, which can lead to dose reductions or discontinuation of therapy.
Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) is a potent cytokine in the landscape of cancer immunotherapy due to its pro-inflammatory and anticancer properties. Primarily produced by macrophages, TNF induces rapid hemorrhagic necrosis of tumors, primarily by disrupting the vasculature within the tumor microenvironment.14,15 The biological activity of TNF is mediated through its interaction with two receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2. The binding activates several signaling pathways, including the NF-κB pathway, which promotes inflammation, immune cell survival, and apoptosis.1 Recombinant TNF (Beromun®) has found significant use in cancer therapy, particularly in isolated limb perfusion (ILP), a methodology used to treat unresectable sarcomas and melanomas. ILP offers an advantage by avoiding amputation and thus preserving limb function. In this setting, recombinant TNF can be administered at doses of 1–4 mg in combination, for example, with Melphalan.16 This technique allows for high local concentrations of the drugs without significant systemic exposure. Despite its effectiveness in localized settings, the systemic administration of TNF has been limited due to its toxicity profile. Systemic high doses can cause serious side effects, including septic shock-like syndrome and organ failure.17
Colony Stimulating Factors (CSFs) are critical cytokines in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, a common and serious side effect of cancer treatment that increases the risk of infection. Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) are the two primary types of CSFs used in clinical settings to accelerate white blood cell recovery, thereby enhancing patients’ immune response and improving their ability to continue with chemotherapy. G-CSF (Filgrastim® and its pegylated form Pegfilgrastim®) is typically administered at 5 µg/kg as a subcutaneous injection starting 24 hours after the completion of chemotherapy until neutrophil recovery is achieved. By contrast, pegfilgrastim requires a single dose due to its extended half-life.18–20 GM-CSF (Sargramostim®) is administered via intravenous infusion at a dose of 250 µg/m² per day, starting within 24 hours post-chemotherapy and continuing until neutrophil recovery.20 Despite the efficacy of CSFs in managing neutropenia, their use can be associated with side effects such as bone pain, fatigue, fever, and muscle aches. Rare but severe effects include splenomegaly and, in some cases, respiratory complications.
Despite their substantial anti-cancer potential, a rapid blood clearance profile and the ability to induce side effects at very low doses have restricted the clinical use of recombinant cytokines. Unacceptable toxicities often limit the escalation to therapeutically active dose regimens. To mitigate these issues, Nektar Therapeutics and Bristol Myers Squibb developed Bempegaldesleukin, and Synthorx developed THOR-707, both of which are PEGylated forms of IL-2. However, both products encountered setbacks in Phase III trials, failing to demonstrate efficacy.21,22 In an attempt to improve their therapeutic window, cytokines can be fused to a tumor-targeting antibody (or antibody fragment) which may enable a preferential accumulation at the site of disease. This strategy is described in more detail in the next section.
From Cytokine to Antibody-Cytokine (“Immunocytokine”) Therapeutics
Antibodies which recognize accessible tumor-associated antigens may serve as ideal carriers for the direct delivery of therapeutic cytokines to the tumor microenvironment. Also known as “immunocytokines”, these antibody-cytokine fusion proteins represent a novel class of biopharmaceuticals that combine the specificity of antibodies with the potent immunostimulatory effects of cytokines23–28 (Figure 1). The therapeutic activity of antibody-interleukin-12 (IL12) fusions, specific to splice variants of fibronectin, in immunocompetent mouse models of cancer may represent a simple proof-of-concept experiment to illustrate the potential of tumor-homing immunocytokines. The tumor-homing antibody-IL12 fusion was found to be substantially more active compared to its non-targeted IL12 counterpart, achieving comparable anti-cancer activity with a more than 20-fold dose reduction.29
Figure 1.
From Cytokines to Immunocytokines as Therapeutic Agents. The systemic administration of recombinant cytokines is associated with high toxicity and limited tumor targeting. Immunocytokines aim for targeted delivery to the tumor site, reduced adverse events, and enhanced therapeutic activity. Innovations such as dual-targeting and activity-on-demand strategies are being explored to further enhance specificity and reduce toxicity.
The first step into clinical trials was led by the groups of Stephen D. Gillies and Reisfeld, which developed Hu14.18-IL2. This immunocytokine combines a humanized antibody anti-GD2, a glycolipid expressed on the surface of neuroblastoma and some melanomas, with two molecules of human IL2.30,31 The antibody portion of Hu14.18-IL2 retains human amino acid sequences within its Fab region, with only the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of murine origin.30–35 In a Phase II clinical trial for metastatic melanoma, Hu14.18-IL2 was administered as an intravenous infusion at 6 mg/m2/day. The therapeutic outcomes were limited, with only one transient partial response observed among the 14 patients with measurable metastatic melanoma36 (NCT00109863). Another Phase II clinical trial for Hu14.18-IL2 involved pediatric patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. The immunocytokine was administered at the recommended dose of 12 mg/m2/day in combination with GM-CSF and isotretinoin. Out of 44 patients assessed for response, 5 achieved complete responses and 2 showed partial responses37,38 (NCT00082758).
Meanwhile, Alan Epstein and his team focused on targeting the necrotic core within tumors, an approach they named “tumor necrotic therapy”. They developed the NHS76 antibody, identified through phage display techniques using cell extracts from Burkitt’s lymphoma Raji cells, and which binds specifically to nucleic acids released in necrotic tumor cells and metastatic sites.39 Utilizing the humanized NHS76 antibody, Gillies et al developed NHS-IL2LT (Selectikine), an immunocytokine bearing a low-toxicity mutant of IL2 (IL2LT).40 The IL-2 moiety includes the D20T mutation, which restricts its interaction with the high-affinity IL2R.40 In the first Phase I study, the maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 0.6 mg/kg, either alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide. Although no objective tumor responses were achieved, long periods of disease stabilization were observed41 (NCT01032681). In a Phase Ib trial involving metastatic NSCLC patients, NHS-IL2LT was administered alongside local irradiation of a single pulmonary nodule. Among the 13 patients treated, two achieved long-term survival, although no objective responses were observed42 (NCT00879866). Another immunocytokine targeting necrotic tumor regions is NHS-IL12, which links the humanized NHS76 antibody to interleukin-12 (IL12). During a Phase Ib trial involving patients with advanced solid tumors and metastatic urothelial carcinoma, NHS-IL12 was administered in doses ranging from 4 to 16.8 µg/kg, in combination with avelumab (NCT02994953, NCT04633252). While the treatment was well tolerated across all dose levels and elicited two complete responses in bladder cancer patients during dose escalation, the dose expansion phase failed to meet the efficacy criteria. Similar to NHS-IL2LT, the therapy resulted in disease stabilization rather than tumor eradication.43
Antigens localized on neo-vascular structures or within the extracellular matrix (ECM) of tumors are attractive targets for the delivery of therapeutic agents.44–46 Utilizing encoded combinatorial antibody library technologies, our group developed the F8, L19, and F16 human monoclonal antibodies, which specifically target the alternatively spliced extra domains A (EDA) and B (EDB) of fibronectin and the A1 domain of tenascin-C (TnC A1), respectively.47–52 Expressed prominently in the angiogenic vasculature and ECM of most aggressive solid tumors and lymphomas, these markers are virtually absent in normal adult tissues, with the sole exception to female reproductive system during the proliferative phase (ie, placenta, endometrium, and some ovarian vessels).53,54 The biodistribution profiles of radiolabeled preparations of these antibodies, studied in animal models and in cancer patients, have been promising, with a preferential long-lasting accumulation at the site of disease.48,51,55–59
The L19 antibody, targeting EDB, has been employed as a carrier for various therapeutic agents, including cytokines, radionuclides, photosensitizers, and coagulation factors.57,60–64 L19IL2 (Darleukin) utilizes L19 in a diabody format wherein each single-chain variable fragment (scFv) is conjugated to a human IL-2 molecule. L19IL2 has been evaluated in over 200 patients in clinical settings, demonstrating significant clinical benefits with manageable and reversible toxicities. Initial trials investigated its use as a monotherapy in renal cell carcinoma55 and in combination with gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer (NCT01198522). Further exploration involved combining L19IL2 with dacarbazine (DTIC) in a Phase II clinical trial for advanced metastatic melanoma patients. The trial established a recommended dose of 22.5 million IU per administration. Four patients achieved durable complete responses, and the proportion of patients experiencing partial or complete responses surpassed 34%65 (NCT02076646).
L19TNF (Fibromun) is a fusion protein that combines L19 in scFv format with human tumor necrosis factor (TNF), exploiting TNF’s natural trimerization to yield a homotrimeric molecule. In initial clinical trials, L19TNF demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Doses up to 13 µg/kg were administered systematically in patients with progressive solid tumors over repeated 3-weekly cycles, without identifying a maximum tolerated dose or encountering significant dose-limiting toxicities.66 Furthermore, in treatments using ILP for locally advanced extremity melanoma, doses of up to 650 µg of L19TNF were well tolerated, with the majority of patients showing objective responses.67 In two subsequent Phase I clinical trials, L19TNF was administered in combination with doxorubicin across multiple cohorts. Among these, 15 patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) demonstrated notable antitumor effects, including one complete remission, one partial remission, and minor tumor shrinkage in seven additional patients. The median overall survival was reported at 14.9 months, which is significant considering the advanced stage of disease in these patients.68 L19TNF is currently evaluated in a Phase I/II study in combination with lomustine for the treatment of 15 patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Efficacy assessments revealed that 20% of the cohort achieved near-complete responses, while 53% exhibited stable disease. The therapeutic regimen resulted in a median progression-free survival of 4.2 months, with a six-month progression-free survival rate observed in 46% of the patients69(NCT04573192). Furthermore, L19TNF is investigated in combination with standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy for treating newly diagnosed glioblastoma in a Phase I/II study (NCT04443010). The study focuses on determining the optimal dosage for subsequent efficacy studies in combination with chemoradiotherapy.
The co-administration of L19IL2 and L19TNF (Nidlegy™) has also been explored, leveraging the synergistic effects of the different cytokine payloads. In an initial clinical trial involving intralesional administration of melanoma patients, this approach successfully reduced tumor mass in 50% of the participants. Additionally, the combination therapy also elicited an abscopal effect, leading to the regression or complete resolution of distant, untreated lesions, highlighting the potential for broader immune-mediated antitumor activity66 (NCT02938299).
Building on these promising results, several clinical trials were started to evaluate the efficacy of Nidlegy in different indications, including melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. As of today, more than 280 patients have been treated with intratumoral injections of Nidlegy, showing a manageable safety profile with mainly local adverse events. The PIVOTAL trial, evaluating the effect of Nidlegy as a neoadjuvant treatment before surgery versus surgery alone (NCT03567889), met the primary endpoint resulting in a clinically meaningful longer median recurrence-free survival (mRFS) with a reduction of 41% (HR: 059) in the risk of recurrence or death in pre-treated locally advanced melanoma patients70,71 (NCT03567889, NCT02938299). Nidlegy™ is currently being evaluated for the treatment of various skin cancer types (NCT03567889, NCT06284590, NCT04362722, NCT05329792).
L19IL12 (Dodekin) combines the L19 moiety in tandem-diabody format linked to the human IL12 payload at the N-terminal.72 The fusion protein is being investigated in a Phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors who have failed prior treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (NCT04471987).
F16 is a fully human monoclonal antibody also developed by phage-display technology, which selectively binds to the A1 domain of tenascin-C, a component highly expressed in the extracellular matrix of solid tumors yet minimally present in normal tissues.49 This antibody, in its small immunoprotein (SIP) format, has demonstrated a broad capacity to target tenascin-C across a spectrum of malignancies including glioblastoma, lymphoma, and melanoma, underpinning its utility in targeted therapy.53,58,73–76 Capitalizing on the favorable biodistribution characteristics of F16, its derivative F16-IL2 (Teleukin) has been explored in combination with chemotherapeutic agents such as paclitaxel and doxorubicin for breast cancer, melanoma, and non-small lung cancer (NCT01134250).77 F16IL2 has been consistently safe and effective when administered weekly at 25 MioIU, demonstrating promising efficacy in combination with paclitaxel for lung cancer and with doxorubicin for various solid and metastatic breast cancers. This regimen has resulted in partial responses and sustained disease control.77,78
Trans-Acting Immunocytokines
Trans-acting immunocytokines are a class of therapeutic agents capable of targeting specific structures in the tumor microenvironment, such as components of the extracellular matrix or tumor-associated antigens. However, the cytokine payload acts distally from the site of antibody binding, thereby activating and recruiting immune cells (like T cells and NK cells) that are not the direct target of the antibody component. For example, immunocytokines based on L19 or F8 antibodies specifically target ECM components, localizing their cytokine payloads directly within the tumor milieu. The primary goal is to optimize the therapeutic window of the cytokines by enhancing their concentration at the site of disease while minimizing systemic exposure. Further, these agents exhibit a trans-acting mechanism by recruiting and activating immune cells to disrupt the immunosuppressive conditions that characterize the tumor environment (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Trans- vs cis-acting immunocytokines. Trans-acting immunocytokines. Cytokines act on immune cells that are recruited to the tumor microenvironment, enhancing systemic immune response. Cis-acting immunocytokines: cytokines directly act on the cells they are targeted to, delivering localized immune activation.
The efficacy of trans-acting immunocytokines has been validated across a range of preclinical models. For example, the administration of L19IL12 and F8TNF to mice bearing CT26 tumors induced a targeted expansion of CD8+ T cells within the tumor microenvironment. This response was characterized by an oligoclonal expansion of T cells, predominantly recognizing the AH1 peptide, a derivative of the gp70 protein from the murine leukemia virus naturally expressed in several BALB/c tumor cell lines.79,80 Treated tumors exhibited a robust infiltration of T cells with a tissue-resident memory phenotype, characterized by the upregulation of activation markers CD69, CD103, and CD49a.80 Isolated and in vitro-expanded AH1-specific T cells demonstrated targeted cytotoxicity by selectively eliminating antigen-positive tumor cells and producing significant levels of IFNγ and TNFα. Despite effectively inhibiting tumor growth when reintroduced into syngeneic cancer models, these T cells failed to achieve complete tumor regression due to suboptimal in vivo persistence.81
In preclinical models of glioblastoma, L19TNF and L19IL12 have demonstrated their potential to engage the immune system despite the complex and immunosuppressive microenvironment typical of the malignancy. The immunocytokines promoted a significant infiltration of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, as well as NK cells into the tumor stroma.82 This response was accompanied by a marked increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, reshaping the tumor microenvironment to favor an immune-mediated attack. Importantly, the study bridged preclinical findings into a clinical context, demonstrating that systemic administration of L19TNF in glioblastoma patients was safe and associated with increased tumor infiltration by T cells and induced observable tumor necrosis.82
Trans-acting immunocytokines may help reshape the tumor microenvironment, enhancing localized immune reactions and stimulating broader systemic immune responses. The intralesional application of L19IL2 and L19TNF in melanoma patients serves as a compelling example, where targeted treatment not only addressed the primary tumor but also elicited systemic immune reactions, as evidenced by the abscopal effect observed at distant sites.66,70
Cis-Acting Immunocytokines and Attenukines™
In contrast to trans-acting agents, cis-acting immunocytokines direct their therapeutic effects specifically upon the cells they target. The principle of cis-acting immunocytokines is to achieve therapeutic modulation by targeting the cytokine payload to the same immune cell which is recognized by the antibody moiety. While the cytokine payload may also affect neighboring cells “in-trans”, the primary goal is to activate the cells directly targeted by the antibody component (Figure 2).
One of the most important products in this class of biopharmaceuticals is represented by PD1-IL2v (RO7284755). This fusion protein marries an interleukin-2 variant (IL-2v) with an antibody targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor. Its design facilitates the simultaneous binding to PD-1 and the IL-2 receptor βγ chains on the same T cell. This dual engagement is proposed to selectively bolster the activity of tumor-reactive T cells expressing PD-1 while avoiding the undesired stimulation of regulatory T cells, which characteristically express CD25.83,84 Initial in vitro functional assays have substantiated that the PD1-IL2v fusion protein specifically triggers cis signaling in PD-1+ T cells, as T cells with blocked PD-1 receptors did not exhibit STAT5 phosphorylation in the presence of anti-PD1-IL2v.84 In the RT5 mouse model, PD1-IL2v therapy initiated robust tumor regression. Expansion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells was observed post-treatment, yet the persistence of these activated T cells diminished over time in relapsed tumors.83,84 PD1-IL2v is currently being evaluated in a Phase I clinical trial, which explores its safety and efficacy in patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors (NCT04303858). The trial includes an examination of PD1-IL2v both as a monotherapy and in combination with Atezolizumab. Insights from another IL-2v carrying immunocytokine, FAP-IL2v, which was targeting Fibroblast Activating Protein in a different trial (NCT03386721), have led to a strategic shift. Mechanistic insights have emerged suggesting that the engagement of IL-2Rα is indispensable for optimizing the synergistic impact of combined PD-1 and IL-2v therapy.84,85 Despite the potential shown in preclinical settings, the development of FAP-IL2v has been deprioritized.
The anti-PD1/IL7v (BICKI®IL7v) represents another example of a cis-acting immunocytokine, merging the specificity of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody with a modified version of interleukin-7 (IL7v). The fusion protein is designed to engage and activate PD-1+ IL-7R+ T cells directly at the tumor site.86,87 In preclinical settings, anti-PD1/IL7v has demonstrated efficacy in orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma models, where traditional PD-1 therapies fall short. In combination with sorafenib or oxaliplatin, the immunocytokine achieved complete responses in treatment-resistant models. The treatments led to marked proliferation of PD-1+ CD127+ (IL-7R+) TCF1+ T cells, highlighting anti-PD1/IL7v potential to activate and expand tumor-specific T cell populations effectively.86,87
Attenukines represent a different technology of immunocytokines which integrates modified cytokines with tumor-specific antibodies. By selectively activating immune responses directly within the tumor milieu, attenukines leverage the antibody’s targeting capability to deliver cytokines that have been molecularly tuned to minimize interaction with non-targeted receptors. The CD38-Attenukine (TAK-573), a fusion of humanized anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and two molecules of attenuated interferon alpha-2b, is engineered to target CD38+ multiple myeloma cells.88 This attenukine utilizes a unique epitope, avoiding interference with existing anti-CD38 therapies, and aims to mitigate common side effects of systemic IFNα therapy. The ongoing-phase I/II clinical trial of TAK-573 has shown promising pharmacodynamic effects in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma89 (NCT03215030).
The Role of the Antibody Format
Immunocytokines harness the targeting capabilities of antibodies to deliver cytokines directly to tumor sites, enhancing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. The choice of antibody format is crucial in determining the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and overall therapeutic potential of these fusion proteins (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Most commonly used antibody formats for the development of immunocytokines, VH: heavy chain variable domain. VL: light chain variable domain. (C) constant domain of the heavy (CH1–4) and the light chain (CL). SIP: small immune protein that uses the εCH4 domain of an IgE antibody to form a covalent dimer. FAB: Fragment antigen binding. Diabody: a dimer composed of two scFv, where the linker between VH and VL is too short to allow intrachain pairing. scFv: single chain variable fragment.
Molecular size represents a key parameter influencing the pharmacokinetic properties of biopharmaceuticals. Full-length immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies comprise both the antigen-binding Fab regions and the Fc region, with a molecular weight of approximately 150 kDa. One primary advantage of this format is the extended half-life of an IgG antibody, which is around 21 days in serum.90,91 Additionally, the Fc region interacts with the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), a process that further prolongs their circulatory half-life by protecting them from lysosomal degradation.1,92,93 Second, the bivalent nature of IgG antibodies ensures robust binding to target antigens. Their high retention rates, along with an extended half-life, provide IgG antibodies with a prolonged window of activity, enhancing their therapeutic efficacy. Third, IgG antibodies bind to Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs), which are expressed on monocytes, macrophages, and NK cells. However, Fc-mediated immune activation remains a double-edged sword. While it is advantageous for inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) against tumor cells, it may also trigger undesired systemic immune responses.94,95 This, combined with the long half-life and high tissue retention, may lead to higher toxicity in patients. One way to attenuate these effector functions can be through glycoengineering or specific amino acid modifications without compromising the antibody’s targeting capabilities.96,97 The high tumor uptake observed with whole IgG antibodies often exceeds that of smaller antibody fragments. However, this superior tumor localization is frequently offset by suboptimal tumor-to-organ and tumor-to-blood ratios, which can lead to increased off-target effects and systemic toxicity.50,98,99 To minimize these undesired toxicities, employing antibody fragments as cytokine delivery vehicles could be advantageous.
Antibody fragments represent a diverse group of engineered antibodies that include single-chain variable fragments (scFv), diabodies, Fab fragments, and scFv-Fc, among others. These fragments retain the antigen-binding specificity of full-length antibodies but are smaller in size, ranging from 27 kDa to 60 kDa, which significantly impacts their pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. Due to their smaller size and rapid clearance from circulation, antibody fragments result in lower systemic exposure and thus reduced systemic toxicity compared to full-length antibodies. Additionally, these fragments tend to have better tumor penetration and distribution, enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of the cytokine payload while maintaining a high therapeutic index. For example, the L19 diabody format demonstrated superior biodistribution properties and achieved higher tumor-to-blood ratios compared to full-length IgG in preclinical models, as confirmed by radioiodinated protein preparations and quantitative biodistribution analyses.50
Antibody fragments can be genetically fused to various cytokines without compromising the payload’s bioactivity or the fragment’s targeting ability, allowing for a wide range of therapeutic applications and customization. For cytokines like the homotrimeric TNF, the scFv is often the preferred fusion partner to maintain the cytokine’s natural oligomeric state. Immunocytokines like F8TNF and L19TNF have demonstrated excellent biodistribution profiles.59,100,101 Interestingly, fusion proteins of the TNF-superfamily that also form non-covalent homotrimers exhibited biodistribution profiles that were inferior to those of L19TNF and F8TNF.102 Expressing these fusion proteins as single polypeptides rather than as monomeric units may enhance their biodistribution and stability.101–103 Glycosylation and the resultant increase in molecular mass can also hinder the effectiveness of tumor targeting in vivo for antibody-fragment-based biopharmaceuticals. Heavily glycosylated payloads, such as murine B7.2, tend to be rapidly cleared via the hepatobiliary route, thus failing to localize efficiently to tumor sites. However, when similar glycosylated payloads are incorporated into an intact IgG, there is a marked improvement in selective tumor uptake.104–106
Immunocytokines based on antibody fragments with favorable tumor-targeting profiles, surpassing the efficacy of the parental antibodies, include products based on IL-2, IL-12, GM-CSF, IL-10, and IL-4.29,47,48,72,107–113 However, certain cytokines like interferon-gamma (IFNγ) may not be ideal partners. Trapping of the cytokine payload by abundant receptors in normal tissues can compromise the targeting performance of these fusion proteins. For instance, antibody-IFNγ fusions were shown to selectively localize to neoplastic lesions only under specific conditions, such as using IFNγ receptor knockout mice or pre-administering a large amount of unlabeled antibody-cytokine fusion protein to wild-type tumor-bearing mice.114,115
Overall, antibody fragments are more suitable for the delivery of most cytokine payloads, as they exhibit favorable tumor-to-organ ratios at early time points following intravenous administration, ensuring more precise delivery to tumor sites with reduced off-target effects.
Activity-on-Demand
Upon intravenous injection, conventional cytokine-based pharmaceuticals display full biological activity, which typically persists until the blood concentration levels drop below a certain threshold. Side-effects of pro-inflammatory payloads may be severe, including hypotension, pulmonary edema, flu-like symptoms, nausea and vomit. It would important to devise strategies that retain therapeutic activity while decreasing toxicity, thus leading to an improved therapeutic index.116 A number of strategies have emerged over the last few years, which can largely be grouped into three main categories [Figure 4].
Figure 4.
Different strategies for Activity on Demand. On-target cytokine assembly: cytokines assemble and activate directly at the tumor site; Extra-cork: cytokines are activated by external tumor-specific factors; Intra-cork technology: small molecule inhibitors transiently inhibit cytokine signaling in peripheral tissues, enhancing tumor-specific activity.
In a first approach, the cytokine moiety is broken down into smaller components, which may reassemble at the site of disease, upon antibody binding engagement with the cognate antigen. The strategy has been described for the two subunits of interleukin-12,117 as well as for members of the TNF receptor superfamily.118
A number of companies and research groups have explored the possibility of “masking” the cytokine moiety with a binding domain (eg, a peptide ligand), using a linker which could be proteolytically cleaved at the tumor site, thus releasing full biological activity.119–121 This strategy (which we refer to as “extracellular corks” or “extra-cork technology”) may potentially suffer from variable levels of proteolytic activity between animal models and human subjects, or even among cancer patients.
A temporal shutdown of signaling can also be achieved by the concomitant administration of rapidly-clearing small organic drugs, which selectively block the cytokine’s activity, as long as they are present in sufficiently high concentrations in blood (“intra-cork technology”). This strategy is particularly attractive when used in conjunction with antibody-cytokine fusion proteins, which clear rapidly from circulation but exhibit a long residence time in the tumor.122,123 For example, the co-administration of Ruxolitinib with L19-IL12 allowed to preserve full therapeutic activity in mouse models of cancer while completely abolishing side effects (eg, body weight loss, liver damage) and undesired release of interferon-gamma into peripheral blood.122
As most of the above-described strategies have been implemented at the preclinical level, it will be interesting to see how they perform in clinical trials.
Dual Cytokine Products
The immune system often deploys multiple signals to boost a response against tumors or pathogens. In particular, the simultaneous concentration at the tumor site of multiple cytokine combinations holds great promise in promoting a more potent anti-cancer activity62,79,116,124 and facilitating the expansion of tumor-specific T cell populations. This potential has led to the testing of antibody-cytokine fusion products at the preclinical and clinical levels.36,37,43,55,66–70,72,78,125–127 For example, the combination of L19IL2 and L19TNF has recently completed Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of stage IIIB and C melanoma patients70 (NCT 03567889, NCT02938299) and is currently being investigated in Phase II clinical studies in patients with high-risk non-melanoma skin cancer (NCT05329792, NCT04362722).
However, it is important to acknowledge that the industrial development of combination products may have its challenges. As individual dose escalation studies would need to be initialized, the potential for duplication of production costs and regulatory activities could pose significant hurdles.128–131
Fusing two synergistic cytokines into the same antibody moiety could simplify clinical development, enabling the simultaneous delivery of two payloads at the disease site. Our team and others have extensively described this strategy named “dual cytokine antibody fusion proteins”124,127,132–139 [Figure 5].
Figure 5.
Examples of “dual-cytokine” antibody-fusion proteins. From left to right: L19 IL2/TNF: potency-matched dual-cytokine antibody fusion protein targeting a spliced variant of fibronectin and featuring IL2 and TNF;124 The IL2 moiety is attached to the N-terminus of the scFv through a polypeptide linker, while the TNF payload is linked to the C-terminus of the scFv via another polypeptide linker. The TNF moiety facilitates the formation of a non-covalent trimer. KS IL12/IL2: anti-EpCAM antibody-cytokine fusion protein engineered with IL12 and IL2;132 The p35 subunit of IL-12 is fused to the C-terminus of the IgG heavy chain, with the p40 subunit of IL-12 connected to p35 via a polypeptide linker. Additionally, IL-2 is fused to the C-terminus of the p40 subunit. FAP IL15/4-1BBL: Fibroblast Activating Protein (FAP) – targeting antibody fragment fused to both 4–1BBL and IL15;134 IL15Rα is fused to IL15 via a polypeptide linker, the IL15 moiety is attached to the N-terminus of the scFv through a polypeptide linker, while the 4–1BBL payload is linked to the C-terminus of the scFv via another polypeptide linker. The 4–1BBL moiety facilitates the formation of a non-covalent trimer. HD70 GM-CSF/IL2: anti-EpCAM antibody-cytokine fusion protein featuring GM-CSF and IL2.136 The fusion protein is based on a heterodimerized core structure formed by CH1 and CL domains (heterominibody) with C-terminally fused cytokines and N-terminally fused scFv.
Abbreviations: VH, heavy chain variable domain; VL, light chain variable domain; CH1, constant domain 1 of the heavy chain; CL, constant domain of the light chain (CL); N, N-terminus, C, C-terminus.
One of the first examples of this approach was a fusion protein featuring IL12 and IL2.132 The molecule (KS-IL12/IL2) was able to induce tumor regression when injected intratumorally into LLC tumors expressing human EpCAM. Similarly, the targeted delivery of IL15 and 4–1BBL showed encouraging therapeutic efficacy in a mouse lung metastases model.134
Dual cytokine fusion proteins have been investigated at the preclinical level for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.135,139 A bivalent anti-CD30 antibody fragment fused with IL12 and IL2 inhibited tumor growth in mice transplanted with hybridoma cells.135 Our group has previously described a promising dual-cytokine antibody-fusion protein for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM).140 The prototype combined an anti-CD38 antibody with IL2 and TRAIL, two cytokines that exert their biological activity at similar molar concentrations. The product induced apoptosis in MM and lymphoma cell lines and selectively killed plasma cells isolated from patients in vitro.
Schanzer et al described a dual fusion protein incorporating IL2 and GM-CSF in a heterominibody specific to EpCAM. However, the single cytokine fusion proteins showed similar antitumor activity as the dual cytokine fusion protein.136
Despite numerous prototypes exploring multiple cytokine payloads at the preclinical level, this class of biotherapeutics has yet to advance into clinical investigation. The excessive molecular weight of these pharmaceuticals might hinder their pharmacokinetic profiles and tumor-targeting abilities.133 Moreover, the fusion of two cytokine payloads with different biological activities could potentially compromise the therapeutic efficacy of the fusion protein. For example, MTD of IL12 and TNF in cancer patients has been reported in the µg range,15,140,141 while IL2 and IL4 have been administered at the mg scale.142–144
Our team has introduced the concept of “potency-matched” antibody-cytokine fusion proteins, wherein a single amino acid substitution is employed to attenuate the potency of the most active cytokine. We first described a molecule featuring IL-2 and a human TNF variant (R108A mutant) fused to the F8 antibody, which targets the alternatively spliced extra domain A of fibronectin (EDA). Remarkably, this fusion protein induced cancer cures in immunocompetent tumor-bearing mice and showed a superior safety profile compared to a similar fusion protein based on wild-type cytokine payloads.124
Combination Opportunities
Immunocytokines featuring pro-inflammatory payloads may be suitable for combination studies with several anti-cancer therapeutic agents as they can mediate the activation of the immune system and increase vascular permeability, thus enhancing drugs’ uptake at the tumor site.
Various combinations have been investigated at the preclinical level, including intact antibodies,54,145–149 immune check-point inhibitors,150–153 bispecific antibodies,154,155 other immunocytokines,107,115,124,126,127,132,134,139,150,156,157 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs),158,159 cytotoxic drugs,76–79,100,160–163 small molecule drug conjugates (SMDCs)164–167 and radiation.42,57,167–176
Surgery and conventional chemotherapy are usually the first-line treatment available to cancer patients. Unfortunately, chemotherapy may induce severe side effects, preventing dose escalation to therapeutically active regimens. Immunocytokines can synergize with cytotoxic drugs by promoting drug uptake at the neoplastic lesion. However, these drugs could, in principle, also kill tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) needed to eradicate tumors. It has been shown that the schedule in which immunocytokines and cytotoxic drugs are administered may dramatically change the therapy outcome. For example, our group showed that tumor remission in immunocompetent mouse models of melanoma was observed when paclitaxel was administered after targeted IL2.163,177 More recently, we have shown that the combination of targeted TNF with lomustine could cure mice bearing orthoptic gliomas and showed objective responses in recurrent glioma patients178 (NCT04573192).
Another strategy to deliver cytotoxic drugs to the tumor site is to use ADCs or SMDCs against tumor-associated antigens, thus sparing healthy organs. The combination of an immunocytokine featuring IL2 and an ADC showed superior anticancer activity compared to both agents when used as monotherapy.158 It has been shown that SMDCs may be superior compared to ADCs in terms of tumor-tissue penetration, immunogenicity and lower cost-of-goods.179–182 Recently, we have shown that non-internalizing SMDCs could efficiently synergize with L19-IL2.164,166,167,183
Immune check-point inhibitors have revolutionized the field of cancer therapy, and several products (against, for example, CTLA-4, PD1 or PD-L1) have gained marketing authorization for the treatment of several malignancies.184,185 Immunocytokines have been shown to efficiently potentiate the activity of immune check-point inhibitors in several immunocompetent mouse models of cancer by turning “cold” tumors “hot”.84,125,138,150,152,153,165,184–189 For example, the combination of targeted-IL12 with an anti-PD1 antibody induced a complete response in all treated mice in a tumor model that usually does not respond to anti-PD1 treatment.125
As described in the previous chapter, combining multiple immunocytokine products featuring synergistic cytokine payloads offers an elegant strategy to increase their therapeutic index. At the preclinical level, several immunocytokine combinations have been investigated.132,133,137,150,155,190 However, only a few products entered clinical trials.37,70,71
Future Trends
The continuous evolution of immunocytokines is imperative for enhancing their clinical utility, primarily by improving their safety profiles. Historically, the administration of cytokines such as IL2 has been associated with severe side effects, including vascular leak syndrome and cytokine release syndrome.7,8 Modern immunocytokine design focuses on maintaining therapeutic efficacy while minimizing these adverse events.25 In the clinical setting, prolonged infusion times have improved the safety profile of immunocytokines. This approach allows for the accumulation of therapeutic levels within the tumor while maintaining low blood levels, thereby reducing the risk of adverse events.116,191
Advancements in protein engineering have given rise to attenuated cytokine variants with markedly reduced toxicity. An example is the development of attenukines, immunocytokines engineered with modified receptor-binding affinities.89 These molecules are designed to confine immune activation to the tumor microenvironment, thereby minimizing systemic exposure. Another approach involves protease-activable cytokines, which are activated by tumor-specific proteases.120 Similarly, chemically controlled cytokines are engineered to respond to specific chemical signals, allowing temporal and spatial control over immune activation.119 Intra-Cork technology offers a novel and straightforward strategy to improve the safety profile of antibody-cytokine fusions. By employing pathway-selective small-molecule inhibitors, this approach transiently inhibits cytokine signalling in peripheral tissues, thereby reducing systemic toxicity. This method ensures that cytokine activity is localized at the tumor site, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy. For instance, the combination of L19-IL12 with the JAK2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib effectively abrogates cytokine-driven toxicity without compromising anti-tumor effects.122
Exploring synergies between immunocytokines and other therapeutic modalities such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy holds significant promise. The combination of these therapies has the potential to amplify anti-tumor responses through complementary mechanisms of action. The integration of immunocytokines with ICIs, such as anti-PD1, can enhance immune activation by simultaneously stimulating effector T cells and relieving inhibitory checkpoints. This synergy can result in a more robust and sustained immune attack of tumor cells. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that immunocytokines, by enhancing T cell infiltration and activation within the tumor microenvironment, can potentiate the efficacy of ICIs, leading to improved outcome.150–153 Combining immunocytokines with radiotherapy offers another promising strategy. Radiotherapy can induce immunogenic cell death and enhance the presentation of tumor antigens, thereby creating an environment prone to immune activation. Immunocytokines may further boost this effect by promoting the recruitment and activation of immune cells.167,168 Co-administration of different immunocytokines can also be a powerful approach. For example, the combination of L19IL2 and L19TNF has shown remarkable anti-tumor activity by leveraging the complementary mechanisms of IL2’s immune activation and TNF’s direct cytotoxic effects on tumor vasculature.70 Such combinations can enhance therapeutic outcomes by simultaneously targeting multiple pathways involved in tumor growth and immune evasion.
Fusing two synergistic cytokines into the same antibody moiety can simplify clinical development, enabling the simultaneous delivery of two payloads at the disease site. Our group and others have described this strategy named “dual cytokine antibody fusion proteins”.124,132,136 Examples of such immunocytokines include KS-IL12/IL2 and IL15/4-1BBL, both demonstrating potent anti-tumor activity in preclinical models.132,134 Our development of “potency-matched” fusion proteins, such as the IL2 and TNF variant fused to F8/L19, represents a significant advancement. By employing single amino acid substitutions to attenuate cytokine potency, we ensure robust anti-tumor responses while maintaining an optimal safety profile.124
Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins represent a promising class of therapeutic agents. However, their cost-effectiveness remains a critical consideration. Despite their innovative approach, the development and production of immunocytokines involve complex and expensive processes, including cell-line development activities, up- and down-stream process optimization, manufacturing activities and clinical operations. This complexity may translate into high costs for patients. Nevertheless, their ability to provide targeted treatment and potentially reduce the need for additional therapies or interventions may offset their higher initial costs. Effective cost management and careful assessment of their long-term benefits versus traditional therapies are essential to fully evaluate their economic viability and overall impact on patient care.
The evolution of immunocytokine therapy through protein engineering and innovative combinations opens new opportunities. By addressing the challenges of toxicity and optimizing multi-cytokine strategies, these approaches promise to significantly improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients.
Disclosure
Dario Neri is a co-founder and shareholder of Philogen (www.philogen.com), a Swiss-Italian Biotech company that operates in the field of ligand-based pharmacodelivery. Eleonora Prodi and Roberto De Luca are employees of Philochem AG, a daughter company of Philogen acting as discovery unit of the group. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Murphy K, Weaver C. Janeway’s Immunology. 9th ed. Garland science; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Atallah-Yunes SA, Robertson MJ. Cytokine based immunotherapy for cancer and lymphoma: biology, challenges and future perspectives. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kartikasari AER, Huertas CS, Mitchell A, Plebanski M. Tumor-induced inflammatory cytokines and the emerging diagnostic devices for cancer detection and prognosis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kendall A. Smith. Interleukin-2. Sci Am. 1990;262(3):50–57. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0390-50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Benczik M, Gaffen SL. The interleukin (IL)-2 family cytokines: survival and proliferation signaling pathways in T lymphocytes. Immunol Invest. 2004;33:109–142. doi: 10.1081/imm-120030732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arenas-Ramirez N, Woytschak J, Boyman O. Interleukin-2: biology, design and application. Trends Immunol. 2015;36:763–777. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rosenberg SA. IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. J Immunol. 2014;192:5451–5458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Klapper JA. High-dose interleukin-2 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of response and survival in patients treated in the surgery branch at the national cancer institute between 1986 and 2006. Cancer. 2008;113:293–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Atkins MB, Lotze MT, Dutcher JP, et al. High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(7):2105–2116. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baldo BA. Side effects of cytokines approved for therapy. Drug Saf. 2014;37(11):921–943. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0226-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, et al. Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(12):975–990. doi: 10.1038/nrd2422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dunn GP, Koebel CM, Schreiber RD. Interferons, immunity and cancer immunoediting. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(11):836–848. doi: 10.1038/nri1961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kirkwood JM, Strawderman MH, Ernstoff MS, et al. Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684. J clin oncol. 1996;14(1):7–17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Old LJ. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Science. 1985;230(4726):630–632. doi: 10.1126/science.2413547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Van Horssen R, Ten Hagen TLM, Eggermont AMM. TNF-alpha in cancer treatment: molecular insights, antitumor effects, and clinical utility. Oncologist. 2006;11(4):397–408. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-4-397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eggermont AM, Schraffordt Koops H, Liénard D, et al. Isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor-alpha in combination with interferon-gamma and melphalan for nonresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter trial. J clin oncol. 1996;14(10):2653–2665. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gamm H, Lindemann A, Mertelsmann R, Herrmann F. Phase I trial of recombinant human tumour necrosis factor alpha in patients with advanced malignancy. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:856–863. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90134-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman GH. Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J clin oncol. 2007;25(21):3158–3167. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, et al. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(1):8–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J clin oncol. 2006;24(19):3187–3205. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mullard A. Engineered IL-2 cytokine takes pivotal immuno-oncology blow. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dolgin E, Bempeg failure unlikely to affect other IL2 drugs. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:1604–1605. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2022-0036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gillies SD. Immunocytokines: a novel approach to cancer immune therapy. Target Can Immu Thera. 2009;2009:241–256. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0170-5_14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sondel PM, Gillies SD. Immunocytokines for cancer immunotherapy. Handbook Can Vaccin. 2004;341–358. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59259-680-5_23 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gutbrodt KL, Neri D. Immunocytokines. Antibodies. 2012;1:70–87. doi: 10.3390/antib1010070 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zheng X, Wu Y, Bi J, et al. The use of supercytokines, immunocytokines, engager cytokines, and other synthetic cytokines in immunotherapy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2022;19(2):192–209. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00786-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Runbeck E, Crescioli S, Karagiannis SN, Papa S. Utilizing immunocytokines for cancer therapy. Antibodies. 2021;10(1):1–23. doi: 10.3390/antib10010010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gout DY, Groen LS, van Egmond M. The present and future of immunocytokines for cancer treatment. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04514-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Halin C, Rondini S, Nilsson F, et al. Enhancement of the antitumor activity of interleukin-12 by targeted delivery to neovasculature. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:264–269. doi: 10.1038/nbt0302-264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gillies SD, Lo K-M, Burger C, et al. Improved circulating half-life and efficacy of an antibody-interleukin 2 immunocytokine based on reduced intracellular proteolysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(1):210–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gillies SD, Lan Y, Lo KM, Super M, Wesolowski J. Improving the efficacy of antibody-interleukin 2 fusion proteins by reducing their interaction with Fc receptors. Cancer Res. 1999;59(9):2159–2166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Becker JC, Pancook JD, Gillies SD, Mendelsohn J, Reisfeld RA. Eradication of human hepatic and pulmonary melanoma metastases in SCID mice by antibody-interleukin 2 fusion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93:2702–2707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Becker JC, Pancook JD, Gillies SD, Furukawa K, Reisfeld RA. T cell-mediated eradication of murine metastatic melanoma induced by targeted interleukin 2 therapy. J Exp Med. 1996;183(5):2361–2366. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.5.2361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lode HN, Xiang R, Dreier T, et al. Natural killer cell-mediated eradication of neuroblastoma metastases to bone marrow by targeted interleukin-2 therapy. Blood. 1998;91(5):1706–1715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.DORAI H, MUELLER BM, REISFELD RA, GILLIES SD. Aglycosylated Chimeric Mouse/Human IgG1 Antibody Retains Some Effector Function. Hybridoma. 1991;10:211–217. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1991.10.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Albertini MR. Phase II trial of hu14.18-IL2 for patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61:2261–2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shusterman S, Naranjo A, Van Ryn C, et al. Antitumor Activity and Tolerability of hu14.18-IL2 with GMCSF and Isotretinoin in Recurrent or Refractory Neuroblastoma: a Children’s Oncology Group Phase II Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(20):6044–6051. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Osenga KL, Hank JA, Albertini MR, et al. A Phase I Clinical Trial of the hu14.18-IL2 (EMD 273063) as a treatment for children with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma and melanoma: a study of the children’s oncology group. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(6):1750–1759. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sharifi J, Khawli LA, Hu P, King S, Epstein AL. Characterization of a phage display-derived human monoclonal antibody (NHS76) counterpart to chimeric TNT-1 directed against necrotic regions of solid tumors. Hybrid Hybridomics. 2001;20(5–6):305–312. doi: 10.1089/15368590152740707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gillies SD, Lan Y, Hettmann T, et al. A low-toxicity IL-2–based immunocytokine retains antitumor activity despite its high degree of IL-2 receptor selectivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(11):3673–3685. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gillessen S, Gnad-Vogt US, Gallerani E, et al. A phase I dose-escalation study of the immunocytokine EMD 521873 (Selectikine) in patients with advanced solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.van den Heuvel MM, Verheij M, Boshuizen R, et al. NHS-IL2 combined with radiotherapy: preclinical rationale and phase Ib trial results in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer following first-line chemotherapy. J Transl Med. 2015;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0397-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Strauss J, Deville J-L, Sznol M, et al. First-in-human phase Ib trial of M9241 (NHS-IL12) plus avelumab in patients with advanced solid tumors, including dose expansion in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11(5):e005813. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Neri D, Bicknell R. Tumour vascular targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(6):436–446. doi: 10.1038/nrc1627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Neri D, Supuran CT. Interfering with pH regulation in tumours as a therapeutic strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:767–777. doi: 10.1038/nrd3554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Neri D, Carnemolla B, Nissim A, et al. Targeting by affinity–matured recombinant antibody fragments of an angiogenesis associated fibronectin isoform. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15(12):1271–1275. doi: 10.1038/nbt1197-1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ongaro T, Gouyou B, Stringhini M, et al. A novel format for recombinant antibody-interleukin-2 fusion proteins exhibits superior tumor-targeting properties in vivo. Oncotarget. 2020;11(41):3698–3711. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Villa A, Trachsel E, Kaspar M, et al. A high-affinity human monoclonal antibody specific to the alternatively spliced EDA domain of fibronectin efficiently targets tumor neo-vasculature in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(11):2405–2413. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brack SS, Silacci M, Birchler M, Neri D. Tumor-targeting properties of novel antibodies specific to the large isoform of tenascin-C. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(10):3200–3208. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Borsi L, Balza E, Bestagno M, et al. Selective targeting of tumoral vasculature: comparison of different formats of an antibody (L19) to the ED‐B domain of fibronectin. Int J Cancer. 2002;102(1):75–85. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tarli L, Balza E, Viti F, et al. A high-affinity human antibody that targets tumoral blood vessels. Blood. 1999;94(1):192–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Santimaria M, Moscatelli G, Viale GL, et al. Immunoscintigraphic detection of the ED-B domain of fibronectin, a marker of angiogenesis, in patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(2):571–579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schliemann C, Wiedmer A, Pedretti M, et al. Three clinical-stage tumor targeting antibodies reveal differential expression of oncofetal fibronectin and tenascin-C isoforms in human lymphoma. Leuk Res. 2009;33(12):1718–1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schliemann C, Palumbo A, Zuberbühler K, et al. Complete eradication of human B-cell lymphoma xenografts using rituximab in combination with the immunocytokine L19-IL2. Blood. 2009;113(10):2275–2283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Johannsen M, Spitaleri G, Curigliano G, et al. The tumour-targeting human L19-IL2 immunocytokine: preclinical safety studies, phase I clinical trial in patients with solid tumours and expansion into patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(16):2926–2935. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tijink BM, Perk LR, Budde M, et al. 124I-L19-SIP for immuno-PET imaging of tumour vasculature and guidance of 131I-L19-SIP radioimmunotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(8):1235–1244. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1096-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sauer S, Erba PA, Petrini M, et al. Expression of the oncofetal ED-B–containing fibronectin isoform in hematologic tumors enables ED-B–targeted 131I-L19SIP radioimmunotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Blood. 2009;113(10):2265–2274. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-160416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pedretti M, Soltermann A, Arni S, et al. Comparative immunohistochemistry of L19 and F16 in non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma: two human antibodies investigated in clinical trials in patients with cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009;64(1):28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Borsi L, Balza E, Carnemolla B, et al. Selective targeted delivery of TNFα to tumor blood vessels. Blood. 2003;102(13):4384–4392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Demartis S, Tarli L, Borsi L, Zardi L, Neri D. Selective targeting of tumour neovasculature by a radiohalogenated human antibody fragment specific for the ED-B domain of fibronectin. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28(4):534–539. doi: 10.1007/s002590100480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Birchler M, Viti F, Zardi L, Spiess B, Neri D. Selective targeting and photocoagulation of ocular angiogenesis mediated by a phage-derived human antibody fragment. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:984–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Carnemolla B, Borsi L, Balza E, et al. Enhancement of the antitumor properties of interleukin-2 by its targeted delivery to the tumor blood vessel extracellular matrix. Blood. 2002;99(5):1659–1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nilsson F, Kosmehl H, Zardi L, Neri D. Targeted delivery of tissue factor to the ED-B domain of fibronectin, a marker of angiogenesis, mediates the infarction of solid tumors in mice. Cancer Res. 2001;61(2):711–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fabbrini M, Trachsel E, Soldani P, et al. Selective occlusion of tumor blood vessels by targeted delivery of an antibody‐photosensitizer conjugate. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(7):1805–1813. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Weide B, Eigentler T, Catania C, et al. A phase II study of the L19IL2 immunocytokine in combination with dacarbazine in advanced metastatic melanoma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68:1547–1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Spitaleri G, Berardi R, Pierantoni C, et al. Phase I/II study of the tumour-targeting human monoclonal antibody–cytokine fusion protein L19-TNF in patients with advanced solid tumours. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:447–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Papadia F, Basso V, Patuzzo R, et al. Isolated limb perfusion with the tumor‐targeting human monoclonal antibody–cytokine fusion protein L19‐TNF plus melphalan and mild hyperthermia in patients with locally advanced extremity melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:173–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schliemann C, Hemmerle T, Berdel AF, et al. Dose escalation and expansion phase I studies with the tumour-targeting antibody-tumour necrosis factor fusion protein L19TNF plus doxorubicin in patients with advanced tumours, including sarcomas. Eur J Cancer. 2021;150:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Weiss T, Polley MY, Kotecha R, et al. CTIM-22. Phase I study results of the antibody-cytokine fusion protein l19TNF in combination with lomustine for patients with recurrent glioblastoma reveal promising safety and durable tumor responses. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25:v66–v67. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Saif A, Rossi AJ, Sarnaik A, Hernandez JM, Zager JS. Efficacy of neoadjuvant intratumoral darleukin/fibromun (L19IL2 + L19TNF) in patients with clinical stage IIIB/C Melanoma (Neo-DREAM). Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(6):3377–3378. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11447-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.NidlegyTM Phase III PIVOTAL trial meets the study’s primary objective demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in recurrence-free survival for patients with locally advanced fully resectable melanoma. Available from: https://www.philogen.com/philogen/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Press_release_PIVOTAL.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2024.
- 72.Pasche N, Wulhfard S, Pretto F, Carugati E, Neri D. The antibody-based delivery of interleukin-12 to the tumor neovasculature eradicates murine models of cancer in combination with paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(15):4092–4103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Schwager K, Villa A, Rösli C, et al. A comparative immunofluorescence analysis of three clinical-stage antibodies in head and neck cancer. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3:25. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Frey K, Fiechter M, Schwager K, et al. Different patterns of fibronectin and tenascin-C splice variants expression in primary and metastatic melanoma lesions. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(8):685–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01314.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Berndt A, Köllner R, Richter P, et al. A comparative analysis of oncofetal fibronectin and tenascin-C incorporation in tumour vessels using human recombinant SIP format antibodies. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010;133(4):467–475. doi: 10.1007/s00418-010-0685-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Pedretti M, Verpelli C, Mårlind J, et al. Combination of temozolomide with immunocytokine F16–IL2 for the treatment of glioblastoma. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(6):827–836. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.De Braud FG. Combination of the immunocytokine F16-IL2 with doxorubicin or paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors: results from two phase Ib trials. J clin oncol. 2011;29:2595. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Catania C, Maur M, Berardi R, et al. The tumor-targeting immunocytokine F16-IL2 in combination with doxorubicin: dose escalation in patients with advanced solid tumors and expansion into patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cell Adh Migr. 2015;9(1–2):14–21. doi: 10.4161/19336918.2014.983785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Probst P, Kopp J, Oxenius A, et al. Sarcoma Eradication by Doxorubicin and Targeted TNF Relies upon CD8+ T-cell Recognition of a Retroviral Antigen. Cancer Res. 2017;77(13):3644–3654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stringhini M, Probst P, Neri D. Immunotherapy of CT26 murine tumors is characterized by an oligoclonal response of tissue‐resident memory T cells against the AH1 rejection antigen. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50(10):1591–1597. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stringhini M. Cancer therapy in mice using a pure population of CD8+ T cell specific to the AH1 tumor rejection antigen. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70:3183–3197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Weiss T, Puca E, Silginer M, et al. Immunocytokines are a promising immunotherapeutic approach against glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(564). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb2311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tichet M, Wullschleger S, Chryplewicz A, et al. Bispecific PD1-IL2v and anti-PD-L1 break tumor immunity resistance by enhancing stem-like tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells and reprogramming macrophages. Immunity. 2023;56(1):162–179.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Codarri Deak L. PD-1-cis IL-2R agonism yields better effectors from stem-like CD8+ T cells. Nature. 2022;610:161–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hashimoto M, Araki K, Cardenas MA, et al. PD-1 combination therapy with IL-2 modifies CD8+ T cell exhaustion program. Nature. 2022;610(7930):173–181. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05257-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Morello A, Durand J, Seite M, et al. 1370 Anti-PD-1/IL-7v immunocytokine favors proliferation & survival of TCF1+ stem like memory T cells and a durable in vivo efficacy in monotherapy or using combinatorial strategy. Regul Young Investig Award Abstrac. 2023;2023:A1526–A1526. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-SITC2023.1370 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Morello A, Seite M, Durand J, et al. 1366 Anti-PD-1/IL-7v bispecific antibody promotes TCF1+ stem like T cells expansion and long-lasting in vivo efficacy. Regul Young Investig Award Abstrac. 2022;2022:A1415–A1415. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-SITC2022.1366 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Pogue SL, Taura T, Bi M, et al. Targeting attenuated interferon-α to myeloma cells with a CD38 antibody induces potent tumor regression with reduced off-target activity. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Collins S. 357 TAK-573, an anti-CD38–attenuated interferon alpha (IFNα) fusion protein (AttenukineTM), has demonstrated IFNα receptor (IFNAR) pathway modulation in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Regul Young Investigat Award Abstrac. 2020;2020:A218.1–A218. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0357 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Li Z, Krippendorff B-F, Shah DK. Influence of Molecular size on the clearance of antibody fragments. Pharm Res. 2017;34(10):2131–2141. doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2219-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.THURBER G, Schmidt M, WITTRUP K. Factors determining antibody distribution in tumors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29(2):57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Pedrioli A and Oxenius A. (2021). Single B cell technologies for monoclonal antibody discovery. Trends in Immunology, 42(12), 1143–1158. 10.1016/j.it.2021.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Pyzik M, Sand KMK, Hubbard JJ, et al. The Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn): a Misnomer? Front Immunol. 2019;10. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gül N, Babes L, Siegmund K, et al. Macrophages eliminate circulating tumor cells after monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Investig. 2014;124(2):812–823. doi: 10.1172/JCI66776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Paul S, Lal G. The molecular mechanism of natural killer cells function and its importance in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mimura Y, Katoh T, Saldova R, et al. Glycosylation engineering of therapeutic IgG antibodies: challenges for the safety, functionality and efficacy. Protein Cell. 2018;9(1):47–62. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0433-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wang X, Mathieu M, Brezski RJ. IgG Fc engineering to modulate antibody effector functions. Protein Cell. 2018;9(1):63–73. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0473-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Wu AM, Senter PD. Arming antibodies: prospects and challenges for immunoconjugates. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(9):1137–1146. doi: 10.1038/nbt1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Xenaki KT, Oliveira S, van Bergen En Henegouwen PMP. Antibody or antibody fragments: implications for molecular imaging and targeted therapy of solid tumors. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hemmerle T, Probst P, Giovannoni L, et al. The antibody-based targeted delivery of TNF in combination with doxorubicin eradicates sarcomas in mice and confers protective immunity. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(5):1206–1213. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Krippner-Heidenreich A, Grunwald I, Zimmermann G, et al. Single-Chain TNF, a TNF Derivative with Enhanced Stability and Antitumoral Activity. J Immunol. 2008;180(12):8176–8183. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.12.8176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Hemmerle T, Hess C, Venetz D, Neri D. Tumor targeting properties of antibody fusion proteins based on different members of the murine tumor necrosis superfamily. J Biotechnol. 2014;172:73–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Siegemund M, Seifert O, Zarani M, et al. An optimized antibody-single-chain TRAIL fusion protein for cancer therapy. MAbs. 2016;8(5):879–891. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1172163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhang N, Sadun RE, Arias RS, et al. Targeted and Untargeted CD137L Fusion Proteins for the Immunotherapy of Experimental Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2758–2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Liu A, Hu P, Khawli LA, Epstein AL. B7.1/NHS76: a new costimulator fusion protein for the immunotherapy of solid tumors. J Immunother. 2006;29(4):425–435. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000208260.80791.3d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hemmerle T, Wulhfard S, Neri D. A critical evaluation of the tumor-targeting properties of bispecific antibodies based on quantitative biodistribution data. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2012;25:851–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Hemmerle T, Neri D. The antibody‐based targeted delivery of interleukin‐4 and 12 to the tumor neovasculature eradicates tumors in three mouse models of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(2):467–477. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Hemmerle T, Doll F, Neri D. Antibody-based delivery of IL4 to the neovasculature cures mice with arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:12008–12012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Doll F, Schwager K, Hemmerle T, Neri D. Murine analogues of etanercept and of F8-IL10 inhibit the progression of collagen-induced arthritis in the mouse. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):R138. doi: 10.1186/ar4319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lo K-M. huBC1-IL12, an immunocytokine which targets EDB-containing oncofetal fibronectin in tumors and tumor vasculature, shows potent anti-tumor activity in human tumor models. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007;56:447–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Schmid AS, Tintor D, Neri D. Novel antibody-cytokine fusion proteins featuring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, interleukin-3 and interleukin-4 as payloads. J Biotechnol. 2018;271:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hess C, Neri D. Tumor-targeting properties of novel immunocytokines based on murine IL1β and IL6. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2014;27:207–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Schwager K, Kaspar M, Bootz F, et al. Preclinical characterization of DEKAVIL (F8-IL10), a novel clinical-stage immunocytokine which inhibits the progression of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R142. doi: 10.1186/ar2814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Hemmerle T, Neri D. The dose-dependent tumor targeting of antibody-IFNγ fusion proteins reveals an unexpected receptor-trapping mechanism In Vivo. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(6):559–567. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ebbinghaus C, Ronca R, Kaspar M, et al. Engineered vascular‐targeting antibody‐interferon‐γ fusion protein for cancer therapy. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(2):304–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Neri D. Antibody–cytokine fusions: versatile products for the modulation of anticancer immunity. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(3):348–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Venetz D, Koovely D, Weder B, Neri D. Targeted reconstitution of cytokine activity upon antigen binding using split cytokine antibody fusion proteins. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(35):18139–18147. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.737734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Mock J, Stringhini M, Villa A, et al. An engineered 4-1BBL fusion protein with “activity on demand”. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:31780–31788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Marchand A, Bonati L, Shui S, et al. Rational design of chemically controlled antibodies and protein therapeutics. ACS Chem Biol. 2023;18(6):1259–1265. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.3c00012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Nirschl CJ, Brodkin HR, Hicklin DJ, et al. Discovery of a conditionally activated IL-2 that promotes antitumor immunity and induces tumor regression. Cancer Immunol Res. 2022;10(5):581–596. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Patel E, Malkova NV, Crowe D, et al. XTX301, a tumor-activated interleukin-12 has the potential to widen the therapeutic Index of IL12 treatment for solid tumors as evidenced by preclinical studies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2024;23(4):421–435. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-23-0336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Rotta G, Gilardoni E, Ravazza D, et al. A novel strategy to generate immunocytokines with activity-on-demand using small molecule inhibitors. EMBO Mol Med. 2024;16(4):904–926. doi: 10.1038/s44321-024-00034-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Dakhel S, Ongaro T, Gouyou B, et al. Targeted enhancement of the therapeutic window of L19-TNF by transient and selective inhibition of RIPK1-signaling cascade. Oncotarget. 2019;10(62):6678–6690. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.De Luca R, Soltermann A, Pretto F, et al. Potency-matched dual cytokine–antibody fusion proteins for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(11):2442–2451. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Nadal L, Peissert F, Elsayed A, et al. Generation and in vivo validation of an IL-12 fusion protein based on a novel anti-human FAP monoclonal antibody. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(9). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Corbellari R, Stringhini M, Mock J, et al. A novel antibody–IL15 fusion protein selectively localizes to tumors, synergizes with TNF-based immunocytokine, and inhibits metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(5):859–871. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Prodi E, Comacchio C, Gilardoni E, et al. An antibody targeting fibroblast activation protein simultaneously fused to interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor selectively localizes to neoplastic lesions. Antibodies. 2023;12(29). doi: 10.3390/antib12020029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.FDA. Codevelopment of two or more new investigational drugs for use in combination. U S Department of Health and Human Services Fada, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); 2013.
- 129.LoRusso PM, Canetta R, Wagner JA, et al. Accelerating cancer therapy development: the importance of combination strategies and collaboration. summary of an institute of medicine workshop. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(22):6101–6109. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Al-Lazikani B, Banerji U, Workman P. Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(7):679–692. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.North B, Kocher HM, Sasieni P. A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in Phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5801-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gillies SD, Lan Y, Brunkhorst B, et al. Bi-functional cytokine fusion proteins for gene therapy and antibody-targeted treatment of cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2002;51:449–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Halin C, Gafner V, Villani ME, et al. Synergistic therapeutic effects of a tumor targeting antibody fragment, fused to interleukin 12 and to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3202–3210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kermer V, Hornig N, Harder M, et al. Combining antibody-directed presentation of IL-15 and 4-1BBL in a trifunctional fusion protein for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;13(1):112–121. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Jahn T, Zuther M, Friedrichs B, et al. An Il12-Il2-antibody fusion protein targeting hodgkin’s lymphoma cells potentiates activation of nk and t cells for an anti-tumor attack. PLoS One. 2012;7(9). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Schanzer JM, Fichtner I, Baeuerle PA, Kufer P. Antitumor activity of a dual cytokine/single-chain antibody fusion protein for simultaneous delivery of GM-CSF and IL-2 to Ep-CAM expressing tumor cells. J Immunother. 2006;29(5):477–488. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000210080.60178.fd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Helguera G, Rodríguez JA, Penichet ML. Cytokines fused to antibodies and their combinations as therapeutic agents against different peritoneal HER2/neu expressing tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(4):1029–1040. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.De Luca R, Neri D. Potentiation of PD-L1 blockade with a potency-matched dual cytokine–antibody fusion protein leads to cancer eradication in BALB/c-derived tumors but not in other mouse strains. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018;67:1381–1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.De Luca R. A novel dual-cytokine-antibody fusion protein for the treatment of CD38-positive malignancies. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2018;31:173–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Saks S, Rosenblum M. Recombinant human TNF-alpha: preclinical studies and results from early clinical trials. Immunol Ser. 1992;56:567–587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Gollob JA, Mier JW, Veenstra K, et al. Phase I trial of twice-weekly intravenous interleukin 12 in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer or malignant melanoma: ability to maintain IFN-gamma induction is associated with clinical response. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(5):1678–1692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Muul LM. A progress report on the treatment of 157 patients with advanced cancer using lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin-2 or high-dose interleukin-2 alone. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(15):889–897. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198704093161501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Dutcher JP, Kim DW, Kim-Schulze S, et al. High dose Interleukin-2 (Aldesleukin)-expert consensus on best management practices-2014. J Immuno Therap Can. 2014;2:1–23. doi: 10.1186/s40425-014-0026- [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Prendiville J. Recombinant human interleukin-4 (rhu IL-4) administered by the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in patients with advanced cancer—A phase I toxicity study and pharmacokinetic analysis. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29:1700–1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Tzeng A, Kwan BH, Opel CF, Navaratna T, Wittrup KD. Antigen specificity can be irrelevant to immunocytokine efficacy and biodistribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:3320–3325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Klein C, Waldhauer I, Nicolini VG, et al. Cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v), a CEA-targeted IL-2 variant-based immunocytokine for combination cancer immunotherapy: overcoming limitations of aldesleukin and conventional IL-2-based immunocytokines. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(3):e1277306. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1277306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Murer P, Kiefer JD, Plüss L, et al. Targeted delivery of TNF potentiates the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of an anti-melanoma immunoglobulin. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(6):1339–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.11.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Orecchia P, Balza E, Pietra G, et al. L19-IL2 immunocytokine in combination with the anti-syndecan-1 46F2SIP antibody format: a new targeted treatment approach in an ovarian carcinoma model. Cancers. 2019;11(9):1232. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Orecchia P, Conte R, Balza E, et al. Targeting Syndecan-1, a molecule implicated in the process of vasculogenic mimicry, enhances the therapeutic efficacy of the L19-IL2 immunocytokine in human melanoma xenografts. Oncotarget. 2015;6(35):37426–37442. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Schwager K, Hemmerle T, Aebischer D, Neri D. The Immunocytokine L19–IL2 eradicates cancer when used in combination with CTLA-4 Blockade or with L19-TNF. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(3):751–758. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Xu C, Zhang Y, Rolfe PA, et al. Combination Therapy with NHS-muIL12 and Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) enhances antitumor efficacy in preclinical cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(19):5869–5880. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Fallon JK, Vandeveer AJ, Schlom J, Greiner JW. Enhanced antitumor effects by combining an IL-12/anti-DNA fusion protein with avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody. Oncotarget. 2017;8:20558–20571. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Nicolini V. Abstract 2217: combining CEA-IL2v and FAP-IL2v immunocytokines with PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2217. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Müller D, Frey K, Kontermann RE. A Novel Antibody–4-1BBL Fusion Protein for Targeted Costimulation in Cancer Immunotherapy. J Immunother. 2008;31(8):714–722. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31818353e9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Hornig N, Reinhardt K, Kermer V, Kontermann RE, Müller D. Evaluating combinations of costimulatory antibody–ligand fusion proteins for targeted cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:1369–1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Menssen HD. Antibody-based delivery of tumor necrosis factor (L19-TNFα) and interleukin-2 (L19-IL2) to tumor-associated blood vessels has potent immunological and anticancer activity in the syngeneic J558L BALB/c myeloma model. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(3):499–507. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2564-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Bauer S, Adrian N, Siebenborn U, et al. Sequential cancer immunotherapy: targeted activity of dimeric TNF and IL-8. Cancer Immun. 2009;9(2):1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Gutbrodt KL, Casi G, Neri D. Antibody-Based Delivery of IL2 and Cytotoxics Eradicates Tumors in Immunocompetent Mice. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(7):1772–1776. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.List T, Casi G, Neri D. A chemically defined trifunctional antibody-cytokine-drug conjugate with potent antitumor activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:2641–2652. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Frey K, Schliemann C, Schwager K, et al. The immunocytokine F8-IL2 improves the therapeutic performance of sunitinib in a mouse model of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010;184(6):2540–2548. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Mårlind J, Kaspar M, Trachsel E, et al. Antibody-mediated delivery of interleukin-2 to the stroma of breast cancer strongly enhances the potency of chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(20):6515–6524. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Gregorc V, Cavina R, Novello S, et al. NGR-hTNF and doxorubicin as second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2018;23(10):1133–e112. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Moschetta M, Pretto F, Berndt A, et al. Paclitaxel enhances therapeutic efficacy of the F8-IL2 Immunocytokine to EDA-fibronectin–positive metastatic human melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 2012;72(7):1814–1824. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Cazzamalli S, Ziffels B, Widmayer F, et al. Enhanced therapeutic activity of non-internalizing small-molecule-drug conjugates targeting carbonic anhydrase IX in combination with targeted interleukin-2. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(15):3656–3667. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Millul J, Krudewig C, Zana A, et al. Immunotherapy with immunocytokines and PD-1 blockade enhances the anticancer activity of small molecule-drug conjugates targeting carbonic anhydrase IX. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(3):512–522. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Georgiev T, Principi L, Galbiati A, et al. Targeted interleukin-2 enhances the in vivo anti-cancer activity of PluvictoTM. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024;51(8):2332–2337. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06705-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Galbiati A, Dorten P, Gilardoni E, et al. Tumor-targeted interleukin 2 boosts the anticancer activity of FAP-directed radioligand therapeutics. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(12):1934–1940. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Zegers CML, Rekers NH, Quaden DHF, et al. Radiotherapy combined with the immunocytokine L19-IL2 provides long-lasting antitumor effects. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(5):1151–1160. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.FoLLI S. Tumor-necrosis factor can enhance radio-antibody uptake in human colon carcinoma xenografts by increasing vascular permeability. Int, J, Cancer. 1993;53:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Morris ZS, Guy EI, Francis DM, et al. In situ tumor vaccination by combining local radiation and tumor-specific antibody or immunocytokine Treatments. Cancer Res. 2016;76(13):3929–3941. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Rekers NH. The immunocytokine L19-IL2: an interplay between radiotherapy and long-lasting systemic anti-tumour immune responses. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Rekers NH, Zegers CML, Yaromina A, et al. Combination of radiotherapy with the immunocytokine L19-IL2: additive effect in a NK cell dependent tumour model. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116(3):438–442. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Sta Maria NS, Barnes SR, Weist MR, et al. Low dose focused ultrasound induces enhanced tumor accumulation of natural killer cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Kujawski M, Sherman M, Hui S, et al. Potent immunomodulatory effects of an anti-CEA-IL-2 immunocytokine on tumor therapy and effects of stereotactic radiation. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9(1). doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1724052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Johnson EE, Yamane BH, Buhtoiarov IN, et al. Radiofrequency ablation combined with KS-IL2 Immunocytokine (EMD 273066) results in an enhanced antitumor effect against murine colon adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(15):4875–4884. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Eckert F. Tumor-targeted IL-12 combined with local irradiation leads to systemic tumor control via abscopal effects in vivo. Oncoimmunology. 2017;2017:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Pretto F, Elia G, Castioni N, Neri D. Preclinical evaluation of IL2-based immunocytokines supports their use in combination with dacarbazine, paclitaxel and TNF-based immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63:901–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Look T, Puca E, Bühler M, et al. Targeted delivery of tumor necrosis factor in combination with CCNU induces a T cell–dependent regression of glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(697). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf2281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Zana A, Puig-Moreno C, Bocci M, et al. A comparative analysis of fibroblast activation protein-targeted small molecule–drug, antibody–drug, and peptide–drug conjugates. Bioconjug Chem. 2023;34(7):1205–1211. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Wichert M, Krall N, Decurtins W, et al. Dual-display of small molecules enables the discovery of ligand pairs and facilitates affinity maturation. Nat Chem. 2015;7(3):241–249. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Cazzamalli S, Dal Corso A, Widmayer F, Neri D. Chemically Defined Antibody– and Small Molecule–Drug Conjugates for in Vivo Tumor Targeting Applications: a Comparative Analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(5):1617–1621. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Srinivasarao M, Galliford CV, Low PS. Principles in the design of ligand-targeted cancer therapeutics and imaging agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:203–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Millul J. An ultra-high-affinity small organic ligand of fibroblast activation protein for tumor-targeting applications. PNAS. 2021;2021:118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Abou-Alfa GK. Tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. NEJM Evidence. 2022;1:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Lipson EJ, Drake CG. Ipilimumab: an Anti-CTLA-4 antibody for metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(22):6958–6962. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Puca E, Probst P, Stringhini M, et al. The antibody-based delivery of interleukin-12 to solid tumors boosts NK and CD8+ T cell activity and synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(9):2518–2530. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Rakhmilevich AL, Felder M, Lever L, et al. Effective combination of innate and adaptive immunotherapeutic approaches in a mouse melanoma model. J Immunol. 2017;198(4):1575–1584. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Corbellari R, Nadal L, Villa A, Neri D, De Luca R. The immunocytokine L19-TNF eradicates sarcomas in combination with chemotherapy agents or with immune check-point inhibitors. Anticancer Drugs. 2020;31(8):799–805. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Sun Z, Ren Z, Yang K, et al. A next-generation tumor-targeting IL-2 preferentially promotes tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cell response and effective tumor control. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3874. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11782-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Danielli R. Intralesional administration of L19-IL2/L19-TNF in stage III or stage IVM1a melanoma patients: results of a phase II study. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64:999–1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Puca E, De Luca R, Seehusen F, Rodriguez JMM, Neri D. Comparative evaluation of bolus and fractionated administration modalities for two antibody-cytokine fusions in immunocompetent tumor-bearing mice. J Control Release. 2020;317:282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.11.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





