Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2002 Mar 5;99(5):2772–2777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052662999

Two-photon excitation microscopy of tryptophan-containing proteins

M Lippitz , W Erker , H Decker , K E van Holde ‡,§, T Basché †,
PMCID: PMC122423  PMID: 11880629

Abstract

We have examined the feasibility of observing single protein molecules by means of their intrinsic tryptophan emission after two-photon excitation. A respiratory protein from spiders, the 24-meric hemocyanin, containing 148 tryptophans, was studied in its native state under almost in vivo conditions. In this specific case, the intensity of the tryptophan emission signals the oxygen load, allowing one to investigate molecular cooperativity. As a system with even higher tryptophan content, we also investigated latex spheres covered with the protein avidin, resulting in 340 tryptophans per sphere. The ratio of the fluorescence quantum efficiency to the bleaching efficiency was found to vary between 2 and 180 after two-photon excitation for tryptophan free in buffer solution, in hemocyanin, and in avidin-coated spheres. In the case of hemocyanin, this ratio leads to about four photons detected before photobleaching. Although this number is quite small, the diffusion of individual protein molecules could be detected by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. In avidin-coated spheres, the tryptophans exhibit a higher photostability, so that even imaging of single spheres becomes possible. As an unexpected result of the measurements, it was discovered that the population of the oxygenated state of hemocyanin can be changed by means of a one-photon process with the same laser source that monitors this population in a two-photon process.


By eliminating ensemble averaging, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy (14) have proven to obtain novel insights into the dynamics of complex heterogeneous systems (57). In the field of biological applications, confocal scanning and wide-field fluorescence microscopy of single protein molecules have been used to study conformational transitions (810), enzyme kinetics (11), local pH in cells (12), and diffusion in membranes (13) and cells (14) (for a review see ref. 15). Although the most general single molecule application relies on the use of fluorescent dyes, which are attached to the biomolecule of interest, the intrinsic fluorescence emission of biomolecules has also been utilized in some cases (1618).

In the present study, we have explored the potential of fluorescence detection of single proteins by making use of the intrinsic tryptophan (Trp) emission. Although aromatic amino acids as Trp or tyrosine are abundant in many biopolymers, to our knowledge there have been no reports on single-molecule detection of Trp or proteins containing Trp. Actually, there are a number of reasons for the lack of reports, mainly relating to the problem of excitation in the UV (λmax = 280 nm) and the limited photostability of UV-absorbing chromophores like Trp.

Because of the supposedly low photostability of Trp, we have concentrated on systems that contain a large number of Trps. One particular class of material we have investigated are hemocyanins, which are large multisubunit proteins functioning as respiratory proteins in the hemolymph of arthropods and mollusks (1921). One of the hemocyanins best investigated is the 4 × 6-meric hemocyanin (Hc) from the tarantula Eurypelma californicum. The complete sequences of the subunits for this species are known (22), and the oxygen binding is well understood (2325). One molecule of oxygen is reversibly bound between two copper atoms in a transverse coordination (26). The oxygen–copper complex gives rise to two ligand-to-metal charge-transfer absorption bands that are centered at 340 nm (ɛ ≈ 20,000 M−1⋅cm−1 per binding site; ref. 27) and 570 nm (ɛ ≈ 1,000 M−1⋅cm−1). The short-wavelength absorption band overlaps with the Trp emission band and results in an almost complete quenching of the Trp fluorescence because of Förster transfer (28, 29). Therefore, in Hc the intensity of the Trp fluorescence monitors the oxygen load (25) and can therefore be used for obtaining oxygen binding curves (23, 25) and to clarify the mechanism of the cooperative oxygen binding. Considering the above features, Euryplema Hc was identified as an appropriate candidate for our investigations. First, it contains 148 Trp residues (22), and second, the Trp emission intensity monitors the oxygen load. Therefore, experiments at the single protein level promised—besides the envisioned imaging—to allow the study of conformational transitions assumed to occur between different levels of oxygenation of Hc.

To overcome the problem of direct UV excitation of Trp, we have used two-photon excitation (TPE) (30, 31), which was previously applied to single-molecule detection by Mertz et al. (32). This technique promises to selectively excite transitions in the UV by visible pulsed laser sources without the broad unspecific background of conventional, one-photon excitation (OPE) in the UV. Compared with fluorescent dyes (33) that were studied in the first two-photon experiments (32), Trp has a rather low two-photon absorption cross section (34). This disadvantage seems to be partly compensated by the large number of Trps in a single Hc. Another important issue is the photostability of Trp after TPE. To get an idea about the photobleaching quantum efficiency of Trp in different environments besides Hc, we also studied unbound Trp and the Trp-containing protein avidin bound to latex spheres.

Materials and Methods

Hc of the tarantula E. californicum was purified and tested according to ref. 23. The buffer used was 0.1 M Tris⋅HCl at pH 7.8 in the presence of 5 mM CaCl2 and 5 mM MgCl2. Trp purchased from Fluka (Neu-Ulm, Germany) was dissolved in the same buffer and used without further purification. For control experiments, Hc was labeled with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR; Molecular Probes). Ten parts Hc solution (2 μM) in borate buffer (25 mM borate/NaOH, pH 8.5/5 mM CaCl2/5 mM MgCl2) was mixed with three parts of dye solution (1 mM) and incubated for 2 h in the dark. The Hc was purified by gel filtration and ultracentrifugation in Tris buffer. Latex spheres (diameter: 40 nm) crosslinked on their surface with the protein avidin (Fluospheres, Molecular Probes) were studied as another model system. Avidin is a small homotetrameric protein with a molar mass of 66 kg/mol. Each subunit has the ability to bind one molecule of biotin and contains four Trp residues (35). From the biotin-binding capacity given by the manufacturer, the number of Trps per sphere is calculated to be 340. The same avidin-coated spheres with a dye filling have been used for control experiments.

Standard emission spectra were measured in a commercial spectrometer (F-4500, Hitachi, Tokyo) at an excitation wavelength of 295 nm. For TPE at 590 nm (34), Fourier-limited pulses of 180 fs were produced by an optical parametrical oscillator (OPO) with intracavity frequency doubling (Angewandte Physik und Elektronik, Berlin), which was pumped by an argon-ion/titanium-sapphire laser source (Coherent Radiation, Palo Alto, CA; see Fig. 1). The light was focused by a microscope objective (Ultrafluar 100×, numeric aperture = 1.2, Zeiss) onto the sample. The fluorescence emission was collected by the same objective and separated from the excitation light with a custom-made dichroic beam splitter and filter set with a transmission window from 310 to 380 nm (both AHF Analysentechnik, Tübingen, Germany). The fluorescence light was either detected by a Peltier-cooled photomultiplier (R4220P, Hamamatsu, Middlesex, NJ) or analyzed with a monochromator and a liquid N2-cooled charge-coupled device camera (Roper Scientific, Trenton, NJ). Two-dimensional images were acquired by scanning the sample through the focus. The image acquisition was controlled by a photon counter (SR400, Stanford Research, Sunnyvale, CA) that registers the fluorescence count rate and synchronously moves the scanning stage. For ensemble experiments (at higher concentrations), the fluorescence was collected from a fixed focal volume within the solution. The solution could be stirred and purged with nitrogen or oxygen to control the degree of oxygenation of the Hc. In the experiments described below, we used an oxygen content of 0.7% (5 torr partial pressure; 1 torr = 133 Pa) for the deoxygenated samples. At this condition, almost all Hc molecules are in the deoxygenated state (23, 25). At 20% oxygen content (150 torr partial pressure) in the oxygenated sample, all Hc molecules are fully oxygenated. For fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), a digital autocorrelator card (ALV 5000/E, ALV, Langen, Germany) was used. Control experiments with TMR-labeled Hc and dye-filled avidin-coated spheres were conducted with a confocal one-photon laser scanning microscope (36).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Diagram of the experimental setup for two-photon microscopy. The laser system consists of an argon-ion-laser (Ar+), a titanium-sapphire laser (Ti:Sa), and an optical parametrical oscillator (OPO). The light beam is attenuated (Attn), filtered (F1), and expanded (BE) before it is focused by a microscope objective (Obj) onto the sample. The fluorescence light is collected by the same objective, reflected by a dichroic beamsplitter (DC), filtered (F2), and detected by a photomulitplier tube (PMT) or a spectrometer and charge-coupled device camera (CCD).

Results

Intensity Dependence of the Fluorescence Count Rate.

After establishing that the fluorescence emission spectra of the Trp residues in Hc after OPE and TPE are identical (excitation wavelength 295 and 590 nm, spectra not shown here), we have investigated the intensity dependence of the fluorescence count rate of Trp in Hc and compared it to Trp in buffer solution and in avidin-coated spheres. Fig. 2A shows the intensity dependence of the fluorescence count rate after TPE for four different samples: a 1 mM Trp solution, a 50 nM solution of avidin-coated spheres and two 2 μM solutions of Hc in the oxygenated (Hcoxy) and the deoxygenated state (Hcdeoxy). The background fluorescence of a blank solution is subtracted from all curves. In a first approximation, a quadratic intensity dependence of the fluorescence count rate would be expected for all four samples when excited by a two-photon process. In Fig. 2 B and C we have plotted the ratio R between the measured (background-corrected) fluorescence signal Fexp and F0 = βI2, which is a measure of the expected fluorescence signal. β is eliminated by normalizing R to unity at the low intensity plateau. Any deviation of this ratio from unity signals a behavior that is not in accordance with a simple quadratic intensity dependence of the fluorescence signal. Along these lines the drop of R below unity in Fig. 2B indicates a fluorescence signal that is weaker than expected. This deviation can be explained by photobleaching. On the other hand, the relative fluorescence increase in the case of Hcoxy in Fig. 2C is attributed to the intensity-dependent buildup of a state with higher fluorescence efficiency (see Fluorescence Increase of Oxygenated Sample).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Excitation intensity dependence of the Trp fluorescence count rate. (A) A 1 mM Trp solution (buffer) shifted by a factor of 5 for clarity, a 50 nM solution of avidin-coated spheres (avidin), and 2 μM Hc solutions in the oxygenated (Hcoxy) and deoxygenated state (Hcdeoxy). Background fluorescence is subtracted. (B and C) Ratios of the measured to the expected fluorescence count rate. The data are fitted with models discussed in the text.

FCS of Hc.

In FCS, diffusion of individual fluorescent molecules can be followed by analyzing the fluctuations of the fluorescence count rate F when the molecules enter or leave the detection volume. The fluctuations of F are described in terms of the normalized autocorrelation function G(τ) defined as (37)

graphic file with name M1.gif 1

where the angular brackets denote the time average and δF(t) = F(t) − 〈F(t)〉 describes the fluctuation of F. The experimental setup used defines a detection volume from which the fluorescence originates. This detection volume is described by the molecule detection efficiency function MDE(r). For OPE in a confocal microscope, Rigler et al. (38) have shown that MDE(r) can be approximated by a three-dimensional Gaussian with 1/e2 radii ω0 (perpendicular to beam direction) and z0 (along beam direction).

With the effective volume Veff defined as

graphic file with name M2.gif 2

a volume contrast factor γ ≈ 0.35 and an average concentration 〈C〉 the correlation function of free diffusion G(τ) reads (14, 37)

graphic file with name M3.gif 3

In the case of TPE, the approximation of MDE(r) by a three-dimensional Gaussian leads to inconsistent absolute values of focal size ω0, concentration 〈C〉 and diffusion coefficient D when compared with values measured independently by different experimental techniques (14, 39). Therefore, in the TPE experiments, we have to use the computationally more demanding autocorrelation function given by Berland et al. (39), which correctly reproduces all three parameters. This autocorrelation function is based on a squared Gaussian–Lorentzian detection efficiency function MDE(r). This shape of the focus leads to an effective volume of Veff = π3ωInline graphic/4λ, where λ is the excitation wavelength.

Fig. 3A shows the autocorrelation trace of a 20 nM deoxygenated Hc solution after TPE of the Trp residues. The 1/e2 radius ω0 of the laser focus is independently measured as 430 nm (the back aperture of the microscope objective is underfilled). Under these conditions, only four molecules are on average simultaneously diffusing through the effective focal volume of 0.46 fl. The data are the result of 30-min integration time and an excitation intensity of 2 MW/cm2, which yields an average count rate of 1,200 cps. By fitting the autocorrelation function of ref. 39 to the data, we obtain a diffusion coefficient D of 1.9 × 10−7 cm2/s and a concentration of 8 molecules per focal volume. The relative error is in the order of 10%. The number of molecules obtained from the fit overestimates the actual value by a factor of 2. This overestimation is caused by the background fluorescence (37). About 10% of the count rate is caused by fluorescence of the buffer and can be detected in a blank sample. Another contribution is from Hc molecules, which produce only one count, either because they photobleach or because the excitation intensity is too low to produce more counts. This single count is not correlated to any other counts so that it appears as a background count.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fluorescence correlation functions of Hc solutions. (A) Intrinsic Trp fluorescence of Hcdeoxy after TPE. (B) Hc labeled with TMR, measured in a confocal microscope with OPE. Both traces are fitted with models discussed in the text.

In a control experiment we have measured the fluorescence correlation function of TMR-labeled Hc after OPE at 488 nm in a confocal microscope. Each protein was labeled by about 3 dye molecules. The resulting correlation function is shown in Fig. 3B. In this case the protein concentration, the mean count rate, and the integration time were 200 nM, 11 kcps, and 25 min, respectively. Fitting Eq. 3 to the data gives a diffusion coefficient D = 2.1 × 10−7 cm2/s, which within the measurement uncertainty is the same value as obtained from TPE.

Imaging of Proteins.

Imaging of single particles has to date been successful only for avidin-coated spheres. The spheres were adsorbed at low coverage on a glass coverslip and imaged by means of the Trp emission after TPE. A typical example of such an image is shown in Fig. 4A. In some of the bright spots up to 30 counts per pixel are detected. The background of a blank sample is in the range of 2–3 counts per pixel. None of the bright spots assumes a fully circular shape, most probably because of photobleaching during image acquisition. Occasionally single horizontal lines along the scan direction are observed, which may result from spheres drifting through the focus. Fig. 4B shows two horizontal linescans at the positions indicated in Fig. 4A, which give an impression of the signal-to-noise ratio obtained.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) TPE fluorescence image of avidin proteins bound to latex spheres, each containing 340 Trp molecules (I = 750 kW/cm2 at 590 nm; integration time per pixel: 50 ms; image size: 5 × 5 μm). (B) Horizontal linescans at the positions indicated in A. Fitting the data to a Gaussian yields a focal spot size of ω0 = 350 nm.

The same kind of avidin-coated spheres is available filled with fluorescent dye. We imaged these dye-filled spheres in a confocal microscope (OPE) to check the adsorption and coverage of the spheres on a coverslip under buffer solution. The number of spheres observed on the surface is comparable in the OPE and TPE experiments when the preparation conditions of the samples are similar. This finding excludes the possibility that the bright spots in the two-photon image (Fig. 4A) are only large aggregates of avidin-coated spheres.

Discussion

Photobleaching.

Many experiments relying on sensitive fluorescence detection are severely hindered by photobleaching of the fluorophores because it limits the signal to noise ratio available. This detrimental effect is especially important for UV-absorbing fluorophores. In the following paragraphs we will give an estimation of the photobleaching quantum efficiency of Trp in different environments, based on a method proposed recently by Mertz (40). The photobleaching quantum efficiency qb phenomenologically describes the probability for an excited fluorophore to bleach. The bleaching reduces the number of (active) fluorophores in the focal volume and therefore reduces the fluorescence count rate. In the present context R, which was introduced before, reads as the ratio between the fluorescence count rate in the presence of photobleaching (Fexp) to that of an ideal sample without bleaching (F0), which, according to ref. 40, can be expressed as:

graphic file with name M5.gif 4

where α is the excitation rate of a molecule in the center of the focus and τd is the average dwell time between the first entry and the last exit of a molecule in the detection volume. For a Gaussian–Lorentzian focus in the case of TPE (volume contrast factor γ = 3/16) τd can be approximated by (40):

graphic file with name M6.gif 5

with ω0 = 350 nm and λ = 590 nm. The excitation rate α of one Trp residue in the center of the focus can be calculated as (41):

graphic file with name M7.gif 6

where σ ≈1 × 10−50 cm4⋅s (34) is the two-photon absorption cross section, f = 76 MHz the repetition rate and τ = 180 fs the pulse width of the laser. We assume equal absorption cross sections σ for Trp in all environments investigated.

Putting together Eqs. 4, 5, and 6, R is fitted to the data in Fig. 2B. Depending on the sample studied, R is denoted as Rbuffer, Rdeoxy, or Ravidin.

The data slightly deviate from the model, which may be the result of an intensity dependence of qb. This intensity dependence could be caused by an additional two-step photobleaching process (40, 42) in which the molecule bleaches by absorption of a third photon in contrast to the case of constant qb, where the bleaching process is assumed to involve no further absorption of photons.

The results of the fitting procedure are summarized in Table 1. It is clearly seen that the photobleaching quantum efficiency qb is highest for Trp dissolved in buffer solution. With a fluorescence quantum efficiency η of 13% (43) this results in an average of 2 emitted photons per Trp before photobleaching. Taking into account the detection efficiency of our setup (0.6%), the probability of detecting a fluorescence photon before bleaching of the Trp molecule is ≈1%. Under these circumstances, fluorescence detection of single Trp molecules becomes highly improbable.

Table 1.

Photobleaching quantum efficiency qb and fluorescence quantum efficiency η of Trp in different environments

Environment D, cm2⋅s−1* τd, ms qb, % η, %
Buffer 80  × 10−7 0.2 6.5 13
Hcdeoxy 2  × 10−7 8 1.5 7
Avidin 1.1  × 10−7 15 0.07 13
*

As an estimate for the diffusion coefficients D for Trp and avidin-coated spheres we used the values for coumarin (47) and uncovered latex spheres (39), respectively. 

The photostability of Trp clearly increases in the protein environments. For Trp in Hcdeoxy a photobleaching quantum efficiency qb of 1.5% has been determined from the fit. Compared with a fluorescence quantum efficiency η of 7% for Trp in deoxygenated Hc (29) this number gives an average emission of about 5 photons per Trp before bleaching. Given the Trp content of Hc (148 residues) and the detection efficiency, one deoxygenated Hc molecule produces on average 4 to 5 counts before photobleaching.

The lowest photobleaching quantum yield has been found for Trp in avidin-coated spheres. From the fluorescence quantum efficiency η of 13% (35) it follows that about 180 photons per Trp residue are emitted before bleaching. With 340 Trp residues bound to one latex sphere, the detector should acquire 380 counts per sphere. This estimate coincides with the count rates in Fig. 4.

It should be noted that the calculated photobleaching quantum efficiency qb varies from sample to sample, so we estimate the relative error to about 30%. Another source of error could be environment-dependent differences in TPE absorption cross section σ of Trp. Because of the lack of experimental data, the TPE absorption cross section had to be assumed to be constant.

Single-Molecule Experiments.

The experiments described above have clearly shown that the high photobleaching efficiency will prevent the detection of single Trp molecules. The situation improves for a single Hcdeoxy molecule, which contains 148 Trp residues and on average produces 4 counts on the photodetector before bleaching. These 4 counts are not distributed randomly, but all appear during the short transit time of the molecule through the focus—they are correlated to each other. If the background count rate is low enough, the statistical method of FCS finds this correlation in the temporal distribution of the detected photons. As shown in Fig. 3A, the number of photons emitted from each Hcdeoxy is sufficient to detect the diffusion of a small number of Hcdeoxy molecules by FCS after TPE. A fit to the FCS data based on an appropriate model yielded a diffusion coefficient of D = 1.9 × 10−7 cm2/s. The same diffusion coefficient as in this TPE experiment was found in a conventional OPE setup with TMR-labeled Hc (Fig. 3B). The diffusion coefficient can also be calculated from the sedimentation coefficient s. The Svedberg equation (44) can be solved for the diffusion coefficient D,

graphic file with name M8.gif 7

where R is the gas constant and T the absolute temperature. The sedimentation coefficient s, the molecular mass M, the specific molecular volume V, and the density ρ of the solvent have the values 37 × 10−13 s (45), 1,720 kg/mol (22), 0.74 cm3/g (44), and 1 g/cm3, respectively. When these values are used, D is calculated to be 2.0 × 10−7 cm2/s in almost exact agreement with the value measured in this work. This finding underlines that in both experiments we watch the diffusion of individual Hcdeoxy molecules and not of molecular aggregates.

For many applications, reproducible two-dimensional imaging of a distribution of single molecules would be desirable. Such an experiment requires several detected photons in several adjacent pixels of the image to distinguish molecules from background. An average of 4 detected photons, as was observed for a single Hcdeoxy, is not sufficient for this purpose. Therefore, the photobleaching quantum yield of Trp in deoxygenated Hc while still allowing the detection of single Hcs by FCS, prevents the more demanding imaging of single Hcs by confocal microscopy, at least under present instrumentation limits.

The photostability of Trp was highest in avidin-coated spheres. Again, each latex sphere was covered with about 21 avidin molecules so that each particle in total contains 340 Trp residues. Actually, this is only 2.3 times the Trp content of our Hc, but obviously the increased photostability and quantum efficiency in this environment allows imaging the spheres in our two-photon laser scanning microscope (Fig. 4). This example demonstrates that under favorable conditions the intrinsic fluorescence of Trp residues of proteins may allow the acquisition of fluorescence images of single macromolecules without the introduction of an artificial dye.

Fluorescence Increase of Oxygenated Sample.

Although for Trp in Hcdeoxy (as well as for Trp in buffer solution and in avidin-coated spheres) R dropped below unity with increasing excitation intensities because of photobleaching, for Trp in Hcoxy the opposite was observed (Fig. 2C). To explain the apparent increase in fluorescence intensity, we will refer to a simple model that involves the following equilibria between different states of a single Hc binding site:

graphic file with name M9.gif 8

In the absence of light irradiation, the rates kon and koff define the equilibrium population between the oxygenated state Ox and the deoxygenated state Dx of a single binding site. Cooperative interactions between the 24 subunits of a Hc molecule will modify this equilibrium. In the state Ox, a dicopper binding site is loaded by oxygen, which creates two ligand-to-metal charge transfer transitions. Because the transition around 340 nm quenches the Trp fluorescence in the subunit by means of Förster transfer, the Trp fluorescence monitors the population of the Ox state. The second transition gives rise to a comparatively weak and broad absorption band that peaks around 570 nm. The 590-nm pulses used for the TPE of Trp are absorbed in a one-photon process by this transition, generating an excited state O*x of one binding site. According to the model, this state does not quench the Trp fluorescence. The population rate k for its formation is proportional to the light intensity at 590 nm. Therefore, besides Dx, O*x is fluorescent, too, and higher illumination intensities should increase the population of this state.

By solving the appropriate system of differential equations the relative population Θ of Ox in the steady state and in the limit of complete oxygenation ([O2] → ∞) is found to be

graphic file with name M10.gif 9

with k/k4 = κI. From this it follows that the oxygenated solution in the presence of 590-nm light is not completely in the state Ox (i.e., Θ < 1), and this does not as effectively quench the fluorescence.

As seen in Fig. 2C, at low intensities Roxy is close to unity because most subunits are in state Ox and the count rate follows the quadratic intensity dependence. Because each subunit that is in the state O*x (or Dx) emits on average 13 times more photons than a subunit in the state Ox (28), a decrease of the population of Ox increases the fluorescence intensity. Photobleaching is taken into account by assuming that the oxygenated sample is affected by the same amount of bleaching as the deoxygenated one, so that bleaching is described by Rdeoxy as given above. Taken all this together, Roxy can be calculated to

graphic file with name M11.gif 10

The data of Hcoxy in Fig. 2C are well fitted by this equation, using κ as a single fit parameter. Using the photobleaching quantum efficiency qb as an additional fit parameter does not increase the quality of the fit and leads to a bleaching efficiency that is about 40% higher than that in the deoxygenated case. Therefore the assumption made above is justified. The deviation from quadratic excitation intensity dependence of the count rate in the oxygenated case is explained by our simple model with the light-driven population of an excited state O*x.

At present it cannot be decided whether the state O*x relaxes to Ox by means of oxygen release and subsequent rebinding, as has been suggested recently (46). A more detailed examination of the photophysics of Hc and the question whether oxygen is released by a light-driven process is called for.

Summary.

Trp is a fluorescent aromatic amino acid that is abundant in many proteins. Because the addition of dye tags may produce unknown conformational effects, it is therefore important to explore the potential of this native fluorophore for optical single-molecule detection. Because Trp absorbs in the UV spectral region we have excited the chromophore by a two-photon absorption process. To get a more quantitative idea about the supposedly low photostability of Trp, we have compared the photobleaching quantum efficiency of Trp after TPE of three samples: unbound Trp in solution, Trp in Hcdeoxy, and Trp in avidin bound to latex spheres. Careful examination of the fluorescence spectra (not presented here) shows that in each case we measure emission from the same states with one- and two-photon excitation. In the case of unbound Trp in aqueous buffer solution, the photobleaching quantum efficiency is highest. This result implies that TPE fluorescence imaging of single Trps will be extremely hard, if not impossible, to achieve. The photobleaching quantum efficiency of Trp decreases appreciably in the protein environments and is lowest in avidin-coated spheres. Because the number of Trps is large in the two systems studied (Hc: 148; avidin-coated spheres: 340) experiments at the single-particle level become feasible. From a single Hc molecule in its deoxygenated state on average 4 photons are detected before photobleaching, whereas this number increases to 380 for avidin-coated spheres. The different photostabilities in the two protein environments define the type of experiment that can be conducted at the single molecule level. In the case of Hcdeoxy the diffusion of single proteins could be measured by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Because of the higher photostability, avidin-coated spheres could be successfully imaged by means of TPE in a confocal laser scanning microscope. These results suggest that under favorable conditions Trp-containing biomolecules can be investigated at the single-molecule level without introducing artificial dye labels.

With regard to Hcs, experiments based on monitoring the Trp emission are especially appealing because the intensity of the fluorescence signal reports on the oxygen load. Investigations at the single-molecule level are expected to yield insights into oxygenation distributions and conformational transitions, which, according to existing theories, occur between different levels of oxygenation of Hc. A substantial drawback certainly relates to the quenching of Trp emission in Hcoxy by bound oxygen, because the weak signal of Hcdeoxy is further diminished. However, the present study has surprisingly shown that even for ensemble studies, the TPE experiment presents certain advantages. In the case of oxygenated Hc the intensity-dependent apparent increase of the quantum yield tentatively has been explained by a simple three-state model taking into account the linear excitation of the copper–oxygen complex. Therefore, we used the same laser source to populate an excited state by means of linear absorption and probe the ground state by means of quenching of the TPE fluorescence of the Trp. This intrinsic advantage offers exciting perspectives for the study of oxygen release and rebinding in Hcs after photo-excitation.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and a Humboldt prize (to K.E.v.H.).

Abbreviations

Hc

hemocyanin

TMR

tetramethylrhodamine

OPE

one-photon excitation

TPE

two-photon excitation

FCS

fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

References

  • 1.Nguyen C, Keller R, Jett J H, Martin J C. Anal Chem. 1987;59:2158–2161. doi: 10.1021/ac00144a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mets Ü, Rigler R. J Fluoresc. 1994;4:259–264. doi: 10.1007/BF01878461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nie S M, Chiu D T, Zare R N. Science. 1994;266:1018–1021. doi: 10.1126/science.7973650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Basché T, Moerner W E, Orrit M, Wild U P, editors. Single-Molecule Optical Detection, Imaging and Spectroscopy. Weinheim, Germany: VCH; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deniz A A, Dahan M, Grunwell J R, Ha T J, Faulhaber A E, Chemla D S, Weiss S, Schultz P G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3670–3675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Neuhauser R G, Shimizu K T, Woo W K, Empedocles S A, Bawendi M G. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;85:3301–3304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu J, Hu D H, Barbara P F. Science. 2000;289:1327–1330. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5483.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wennmalm S, Edman L, Rigler R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:10641–10646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eggeling C, Fries J R, Brand L, Gunther R, Seidel C A M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:1556–1561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ha T J, Ting A Y, Liang J, Caldwell W B, Deniz A A, Chemla D S, Schultz P G, Weiss S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:893–898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu H P, Xun L Y, Xie X S. Science. 1998;282:1877–1882. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haupts U, Maiti S, Schwille P, Webb W W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13573–13578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sonnleitner M, Schutz G J, Schmidt T. Chem Phys Lett. 1999;300:221–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schwille P, Haupts U, Maiti S, Webb W W. Biophys J. 1999;77:2251–2265. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77065-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weiss S. Science. 1999;283:1676–1683. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5408.1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peck K, Stryer L, Glazer A N, Mathies R A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:4087–4091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.11.4087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dickson R M, Cubitt A B, Tsien R Y, Moerner W E. Nature (London) 1997;388:355–358. doi: 10.1038/41048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wennmalm S, Blom H, Wallerman L, Rigler R. Biol Chem. 2001;382:393–397. doi: 10.1515/BC.2001.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.van Holde K E, Miller K. Adv Protein Chem. 1995;47:1–81. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60545-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Salvato B, Beltramini M. Life Chem Rep. 1990;8:1–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Holde K E, Miller K I, Decker H. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:15563–15566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100010200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Voit R, Feldmaier-Fuchs G, Schweikardt T, Decker H, Burmester T. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:39339–39344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005442200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Decker H, Sterner R. J Mol Biol. 1990;211:281–293. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90027-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Robert C, Decker H, Richey B, Gill S J, Wyman J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:1891–1895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Loewe R. J Comp Physiol B. 1978;128:161–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Magnus K A, Hazes B, Ton-That H, Bonaventura C, Bonaventura J. Proteins. 1994;19:302–309. doi: 10.1002/prot.340190405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Solomon E I, Tuczek F, Root D E, Brown C A. Chem Rev. 1994;94:827–856. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Erker W, Hübler R, Decker H. Protein Sci. 2001;10, Suppl. 1:144. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boteva R, Ricchelli F, Sartor G, Decker H. J Photobiol Photochem B. 1993;17:145–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Göppert-Mayer M. Ann Phys. 1931;9:273–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Denk W, Strickler J H, Webb W W. Science. 1990;248:73–76. doi: 10.1126/science.2321027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mertz J, Xu C, Webb W W. Opt Lett. 1995;20:2532–2534. doi: 10.1364/ol.20.002532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu C, Webb W W. J Opt Soc Am B. 1996;13:481–491. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rehms A, Callis P. Chem Phys Lett. 1993;208:276–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kurzban G P, Gitlin G, Bayer E A, Wilchek M, Horowitz P M. Biochemistry. 1989;28:8537–8542. doi: 10.1021/bi00447a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kulzer F, Koberling F, Christ T, Mews A, Basché T. Chem Phys. 1999;247:23–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thompson N L. In: Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Techniques. Lakowicz J, editor. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum; 1991. pp. 337–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rigler R, Mets Ü, Widengren J, Kask P. Eur Biophys J. 1993;22:169–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Berland K M, So P T C, Gratton E. Biophys J. 1995;68:694–701. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80230-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mertz J. Eur Phys J D. 1998;3:55–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu C, Webb W W. Nonlinear And Two-Photon Induced Fluorescence, In: Lakowicz J, editor. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Vol. 5. New York: Plenum; 1997. pp. 471–540. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Eggeling C, Widengren J, Rigler R, Seidel C A M. Anal Chem. 1998;70:2651–2659. doi: 10.1021/ac980027p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen R F. Anal Lett. 1967;1:35–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cantor C R, Schimmel P R. Biophysical Chemsitry, Part 2: Techniques for the Study of Biological Structure and Function. San Francisco: Freeman; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schneider H J, Markl J, Schartau W, Linzen B. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1977;358:1133–1141. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1977.358.2.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Floyd J S, Haralampus-Grynaviski N, Ye T, Zheng B, Simon J D, Edington M D. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:1478–1483. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brand L, Eggeling C, Zander C, Drexhage K H, Seidel C A M. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:4313–4321. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES