Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity of carbaryl at environmentally relevant concentrations on the non-target organism Allium cepa L. and to investigate the potential protective effects of Cassia angustifolia Vahl. (Senna) leaf extract (Ca-ex) against this toxicity. Germination parameters, mitotic index (MI), micronucleus (MN), chromosomal aberrations (CAs), comet assays, and spectral shift analyses were employed to assess both toxic and protective effects. Oxidative stress parameters were also investigated. A plant-based bioassay was conducted using root tips and leaves of A. cepa. Exposure to 0.3 µg/L carbaryl resulted in a 41% reduction in germination, a 22% decrease in cell proliferation, and significant increases in DNA fragmentation, MN, CAs, and anatomical damage. Both the decrease in MI rates and the significant increase in MN frequency indicate the cytotoxic effect of carbaryl. In the groups in which Ca-ex was administered together with carbaryl, MI rates increased again and MN frequency decreased, and these findings indicate the protective effect of Ca-ex. Exposure to carbaryl resulted in a significant decrease in chlorophyll levels and a significant increase in malondialdehyde, proline, superoxide dismutase and catalase levels. Administration of Ca-ex in combination with carbaryl improved the oxidative stress parameter levels. The mitigating effect of the extract is likely associated with its phenolic content, and LC–MS/MS analysis identified quercetin, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid as major components. While the findings provide promising evidence that C. angustifolia extract can mitigate carbaryl-induced toxicity in A. cepa, it is important to highlight that this study primarily focused on the protective effects in a non-target plant model. Future investigations should aim to explore the compatibility of such extracts with pesticide formulations, their effects on target pests, and their regulatory and economic feasibility in agricultural systems.
Keywords: Allium test, Cassia angustifolia, Genotoxicity, LC–MS/MS, Protective effect, Spectral shift
Subject terms: Cell biology, Molecular biology
Introduction
Pesticides are used to prevent the destruction of crops and to increase yields in agricultural production. Since they are also used against mice, mosquitoes and insects in daily life, they are also distributed in homes, offices, schools, parks and garden1,2. Pesticides also threaten non-target organisms by contaminating ecosystems and degrading the quality of air, water and soil. Pesticides accumulate in the soil and cause changes in the physicochemical and biological properties of the soil. This phenomenon has been associated with decreased soil health and degradation of flora and fauna. Pesticides reach rivers and groundwater from soil, causing aquatic pollution and jeopardising the quality of water resources. Notably, this contamination has the potential to reach drinking water sources, thereby posing a substantial threat to human health3,4. El-Nahhal and El-Nahhal5 detected 113 pesticide residues in drinking water samples from 31 countries worldwide and reported that 61 of these residues were insecticides, 31 were herbicides and 21 were fungicides. The toxicity classes of these residues were determined to be IA to IV. It is estimated that approximately 385 million acute pesticide poisonings occur annually worldwide, resulting in approximately 11,000 deaths. A multitude of epidemiological studies have demonstrated a correlation between prolonged exposure to pesticides and a plethora of health complications, encompassing respiratory ailments, endocrine dysfunction, digestive disorders, reproductive issues and various forms of cancer5,6. Many pesticides are also reported to induce oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage, Alzheimer’s disease and neurotoxicity7.
Carbaryl is a synthetic carbamate pesticide with the chemical name 1-naphthol-N-methyl carbamate, derived from carbamic acid. Carbaryl is a broad-spectrum insecticide used since 1956 and is widely used for pest control in agricultural fields, poultry, homes and gardens7,8. It is a highly effective insecticide against beetles, mites, lice and centipedes. Carbaryl is a neurotoxin that kills insects by disrupting the normal function of the nervous system and acting as an inhibitor of choline esterase8,9. The excessive use of carbaryl has resulted in significant environmental contamination, including of water resources, which are currently facing scarcity. The presence of carbaryl has been detected in water samples from rivers and inland seas at concentrations ranging from 4.320 to 0.2134 μg/L. Furthermore, residues of the carbaryl have been found in sediment at levels of 1.851 μg/g, as well as in organisms such as plankton and fish, with concentrations ranging from 0.4140 to 2.436 μg/g10,11. Carbaryl has been banned in the European Union and Switzerland since 2007 and is completely prohibited in India. Some applications in Canada were withdrawn in 2019, yet it is still used for agricultural and professional purposes throughout the US. However, in some states, its use is restricted to licensed professionals12. In response to the environmental and biological impacts of toxic pesticides such as carbaryl, more sustainable, ecological alternatives are gaining attention. These include biological control methods such as predators, parasites or pathogens; plant-based pesticides such as neem oil, garlic extract or pyrethrins; and integrated pest management strategies. These alternatives aim to protect both human health and the balance of ecosystems13.
Carbaryl has the potential to enter the food chain via the pollution of aquatic ecosystems and agricultural irrigation, affecting not only seafood but also plant products and, consequently, humans. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the French International Agency for Research on Cancer have both classified it as a potential carcinogen for humans14. It has been reported to cause congenital malformations in the embryos of animal organisms and histopathological changes in various organs, including the heart, liver, kidney, lung and brain10. Conversely, carbaryl has been observed to disrupt the endocrine system, resulting in fluctuations in hormone levels. Carbaryl intoxication has been demonstrated to reduce testosterone, progesterone and estradiol levels, decrease RNA levels within cells, and inhibit DNA synthesis, thereby limiting protein expression and growth7. Pesticides and insecticides cause a wide range of toxicity in plants, including oxidative stress, necrosis, burns, leaf abnormalities, physiological decline, chlorosis, cytogenetic damage and stunting15,16. Carbaryl has also been demonstrated to induce severe toxic effects in plant life. The occurrence of toxicity symptoms in certain plant life has been documented in the extant literature. Sooksawata et al.17 reported that exposure to 73.5 and 147.25 mg/kg carbaryl in sunn hemp caused a decrease in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents. The mechanisms of carbaryl toxicity in plants especially in A. cepa, have not yet been clearly elucidated and further research is required on this subject. This study provides a comprehensive toxicity profile of carbaryl.
In the context of toxicity studies, it is important to identify the effects and mechanisms of action of chemical agents. However, the identification of a solution to the problem under investigation can greatly increase the value of the study. Plant extracts such as Ginkgo biloba, green tea, sage tea, green coffee, grape seed, goat horn and blackberry have recently been used to reduce toxicity caused by chemical agents such as pesticides. Cassia angustifolia Vahl. (Senna) leaf extract is one of these extracts. Its natural habitats are Yemen, Egypt and Saudi Arabia and it is a fast-growing shrub up to 8 m in height. The leaves and bark of C. angustifolia are used as an anti-helmentic for intestinal worms. It is also used as an antipyretic in the treatment of typhoid, splenomegaly, anaemia and cholera caused by Escherichia coli and as a laxative to relieve constipation18. It exhibits a strong antioxidant activity as it contains many antioxidants such as rhein, rhein-8-glucoside, aloe-emodin, sennosides C and D, anthrone diglucoside, tinnevelin glycoside and 6-hydroxy musizin glycoside, resin, flavonoids, phytosterols and calcium oxalate. Therefore, it has many therapeutic properties, including antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer and antihyperlipidaemic actions19,20. The biological, pharmacological and therapeutic effects of C. angustifolia have been reported in many studies. These studies show that C. angustifolia has an important antioxidant power. Given this power, C. angustifolia is expected to reduce the toxic effects induced by chemicals. In this study, the toxicity mitigation capacity of C. angustifolia against carbaryl-induced toxicity in A. cepa was investigated. In this way, both a comprehensive toxicity profile of carbaryl was elucidated and the protective effect of C. angustifolia was determined. Toxic and ameliorative effects were analyzed morpho-physiologically, biochemically, cytogenetically and anatomically. This study confirmed the hypothesis that carbaryl is toxic at the dose detected in the environment and that C. angustifolia can be used as a solution to eliminate/reduce this toxicity problem.
Material and methods
Collection, extraction and quantitative analysis of C. angustifolia
Cassia angustifolia (two-year-old mature plant) leaves were collected from 40.938989, 38.280763 (Bulancak/Turkiye) and later identified by Prof. Dr. Zafer TÜRKMEN at the Department of Botany, Giresun University (Turkiye). A plant specimen bearing the voucher number BIO-Ca-an-1505/2024 was deposited in the herbarium collection. Diseased leaves were excised, and the remaining intact portions were subjected to drying at 35 °C for two days and subsequent pulverisation. 2 g of the sample were incubated in 100 mL of ethanol for 24 h at 35 °C and filtered with Whatman No. 4 filter paper following the incubation period21. Following the centrifugation of the filtrate at 5,000 rpm for 10 min., the supernatant was removed at 40 °C using an evaporator. The resulting C. angustifolia extract was then coded as Ca-ex. The quantitative determination of phenolic compounds in C. angustifolia was conducted through LC–MS/MS analysis (Thermo Scientific, ODS Hypersil 4.6*250 mm column). 1 g of Cassia angustifolia was extracted with dichloromethane-methanol solvent (1:4) and the extract was filtered with a 0.45 μm sterile syringe. The elution gradient comprised water with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase A) and methanol (mobile phase B). The LC–MS/MS analysis was conducted at HUBTUAM (Hitit University) and the detailed informations about analysis profile are given in supplamentary material. The total ion chromatogram is presented in Figure S1, the gradient profile is shown in Table S1, and the ions in MS/MS are listed in Table S2.
Chemical analysis on environmentally relevant concentrations of carbaryl
To determine the toxicity of carbaryl, the amount of carbaryl in the aquatic environment was determined to ensure that the preferred dose was environmentally compatible and realistic. For this purpose, carbaryl was measured at three points in the Pazarsuyu stream (Giresun/Turkiye), which is located near the agricultural areas. Water samples from three different points of Pazarsuyu stream (25 m, 50 m and 100 m distance) were collected and stored in a sterile-refrigerated box at 4 °C until analysed. Samples were analysed within 48 h to avoid changes in sample composition and carbaryl content. The amount of carbaryl in water samples was analysed by HPLC22. The conditions of HPLC analysis and extraction methods are given in supplementary material file.
Experimental groups
Allium cepa bulbs were purchased from Akdeniz Tarım (TR -55-K-009228) and used as a bioindicator in toxicity assays. Carbaryl (CAS Number 63–25-2) was obtained from Merck. Allium bulbs were submerged in distilled water for a period of 24 h to facilitate rooting. As a result of HPLC analysis, the concentration of carbaryl in the samples taken 25 m, 50 mand 100 maway from Pazarsuyu stream was determined in the range of 0.33–0.81 µg/L, respectively. In this study, the lowest dose determined by HPLC analysis was taken as basis and 0.3 µg/L carbaryl was used as environmentally relevant concentration. The Ca-ex doses, were determined based on the IC50 value of the radical scavenging effect indicating antioxidant activity23 (supplementary material file, Figure S2). In this context, two different doses of 3.5 mg/mL (IC50) and 7 mg/mL (IC50 × 2) were applied and dose-dependent protective effect was also investigated. Allium bulbs were divided into six groups: Group I: Distilled water, Group II: 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex, Group III: 7 mg/mL Ca-ex, Group IV: 0.3 µg/L carbaryl, Group V: 0.3 µg/L carbaryl + 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex, Group VI: 0.3 µg/L carbaryl + 7 mg/mL Ca-ex. Group II and Group III were established to ascertain whether varying doses of Ca-ex were toxic, while Group IV was constituted to determine the impact of carbaryl. Group V and Group VI were treated with carbaryl in combination with Ca-ex, with the objective of determining the protective effect of Ca-ex by quantifying the extent to which the effect of carbaryl was reduced. Following a seven-day germination period at room temperature (20 °C) and 60% humidity, root tissues and leaves were collected for further analysis24. Experimental research on plant samples, including the supply of plant material, complies with institutional, national and international guidelines and legislation.
Physiological parameters
The criteria proposed by Pehlivan et al.25 were taken into consideration in the measurement of three different physiological parameters.
Radicle length (cm) was measured to determine root length,
By weighing the bulb weights at the start and conclusion of the 72-h period, weight (g) increase was calculated.
- Eq. (1) was used to determine the germination percentage.

1
Cytogenetic parameters
CAs and MN test
CAs and MN were determined using the acetocarmine crushing procedure. After being sliced into 1-cm lengths, the root tips were fixed for two h in a “Clarke” fixator. Washed for 15 min in 96% ethyl alcohol, hydrolyzed for 17 min at 60 °C in 1 N HCl, and then stored for 30 min in 45% glacial acetic acid. Acetocharmine-stained for 24 h, crushed on a slide, viewed seen with a camera-equipped research microscope (Irmeco IM-450 TI model), and captured on photographed at × 400 magnification26. Equation (2) was utilized in order to determine MI. For CAs, MN and MI counts, 10 slides were prepared per group. For CAs and MN, 100 cells per slide and 1,000 cells in total and for MI, 1,000 cells per slide and 10,000 cells in total were analysed. Cells at various phases of mitosis had all damages and counts examined.
![]() |
2 |
Spectral analysis of DNA-carbaryl interaction
DNA was initially extracted from A. cepa root tip cells for spectral analysis27. Spectrophotometric analysis was used to evaluate the quantity and purity of DNA. A260/A280 ratios of roughly 1.8 are recognized as proof of DNA purity. To determine the DNA-carbaryl interaction, the absorbance of the mixture containing different concentrations of carbaryl and DNA was measured in the range of 220–300 nm in a spectrophotometer (Mapada UV-6100PCS)28. All measurements were carried out in triplicate.
Comet analysis
DNA isolation from root cells was carried out using the Sharma et al.27 method. The method suggested by Dikilitaş and Koçyiğit29 was used to analyze Comet. The nuclear slides were kept in ethanol for 24 h and dried in an oven. With the help of a pipette, 100 mL of agarose [1% normal melting point (NMP) dissolved in distilled water at 50 °C] was poured onto the slides and covered with coverslips. To freeze the gel, the slides were refrigerated for 5 min. A mixture of freshly isolated cell solution and 1% low melting point (LMP) agarose was used to create the second layer. 100 µL of the mixture was put on the first layer and covered with a coverslip after the cell suspension and LMP agarose were well combined in distilled water at 40 °C in a ratio of 1/8 on a slide. The coverslips were taken off after the preparations had cooled in the fridge for 5 min. To give the DNA time to relax and dissolve, the preparations were put in the buffer solution in the electrophoresis tank and incubated for 40 min. Subsequently, the preparations were subjected to electrophoresis. Electrophoresis conditions and comet analysis were given in supplementary material file30.
Measurements of biochemical parameters
MDA measurement
For MDA measuremets, 1 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid was used to homogenize 0.5 g of root tips. After being moved to a fresh tube, the homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. After being moved to a fresh tube, the supernatant and equal volues of 0.5% thiobarbituric acid were incubated for 30 min at 96 °C in a 20% trichloroacetic acid solution. After cooling, the tubes were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm. At 532 nm, the supernatant’s absorbance was read, and the MDA levels were expressed as μM/g FW31.
Proline measurement
To determine the levels of free proline, 10 mL of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid were used to homogenize 0.5 g of root tips. Using filter paper, the homogenate was filtered. The filtrate was put in a test tube with 2 mL of glacial acetic acid and 2 mL of acid-ninhydrin, and it was allowed to react for 1 h at 100 °C. An ice bath was used to stop the reaction. 4mL of toluene were used to extract the reaction mixture, and it was agitated for 20 s. After aspirating the toluene-containing chromophore from the aqueous phase and warming it to 21 °C, the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 520 nm using toluene as a blind32. Equation (3) was used to calculate the proline concentration on a fresh weight basis based on a standard curve.
![]() |
3 |
Chlorophyll measurement
Chlorophyll extraction and measurement were carried out according to the method proposed by Tümer et al.33. A leaf sample weighing 0.2 g was collected. The leaves were mashed in a mortar and pestle after being chilled in a refrigerator at 4 °C. In a dark tube, the leaf materials were crushed and extracted using 5 mL of 80% acetone. After filtering, the mixture was moved to a fresh tube, 5 mL of 80% acetone was added, and it was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm. The sediment-free filtrate was moved to a fresh tube. This procedure was carried out again with 80% acetone present. The absorbance of the green chlorophyll solution was measured at 645 and 663 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer. Witham et al.34 equation was used to determine the concentrations of chlorophylls.
Enzyme extraction
The extraction process was done at 4 °C. 5 mL of cold sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.8) was used to crush 0.5 g of root tip in a mortar to homogenize it. After centrifuging the homogenate for 20 min at 10,000 rpm, the supernatant was kept at 4 °C until analysis35. Biochemical analyses were performed in triplicate.
SOD measurement
For the SOD activity assay, the reaction mixture was prepared as follows: 1.5 mL 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer, 0.3 mL 130 mM methionine, 0.3 mL 750 μM nitroblue tetrazolium chloride, 0. 3 mL 0.1 mM EDTA-Na2, 0.3 mL 20 μM riboflavin, 0.01 mL enzyme extract, 0.01 mL 4% insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone and 0.28 mL de-ionised water. The prepared solution was placed in sterile tubes. The tubes were exposed to a fluorescent lamp (15 W) for 10 min to start the reaction, and they were left in the dark for 10 min to finish it. The absorbance at 560 nm was measured36. The quantity of SOD needed to cause 50% inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium chloride reduction under experimental circumstances was defined as one unit of SOD activity, and it was measured as U/mg FW.
CAT measurement
UV–Vis spectrophotometry was used to measure the CAT activity in 2.8 mL of total volume at 25 °C (1.5 mL 200 mM monosodium phosphate buffer, 1.0 mL distilled water and 0.3 mL 0.1 M H2O2) reaction mixture. 0.2 mL of enzyme extract was added to start the reaction. Monitoring the drop in absorbance at 240 nm brought on by H2O2 consumption allowed for the measurement of CAT activity. CAT activity was measured as OD240nm min/g and reported as units per minute per fresh weight of root tip37.
Anatomical observations
The tips of the roots were cut into 1-cm lengths, sandwiched between pieces of foam, and then sectioned transversely with a razor blade in a single motion. Following 2 min of staining with 5% methylene blue on a slide, the sections were covered with a coverslip, viewed under research microscope (Irmeco IM-450 TI model) equipped with a camera attachment, and photographed at × 200 magnification38.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was conducted utilising the SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 22) software programme. The mean and standard deviation values were calculated for the entire dataset. The analysis employed the one-way ANOVA test to ascertain within-group differences for the measurements obtained. The 'one-way ANOVA’ method was implemented to identify the differences between groups for each analysis. The ‘Duncan’ test, a post-hoc test, was selected to determine the differences. In the statistical analysis, p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results and discussion
Physiological findings
As demonstrated in Table 1, the alterations in the physiology of A. cepa bulbs induced by carbaryl are evident. Groups I (control), II and III exhibited the highest levels of germination, root elongation and weight gain. The physiological parameter values measured in these groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). In Group IV, where carbaryl was applied, significant (p < 0.05) decreases were detected in all parameters. Compared to the control group, there was a 41% decrease in germination, around 3.21 times less root growth and 4.27 times less weight gain. Groups V and VI, which received Ca-ex in addition to carbaryl, showed significant (p < 0.05) increases in the values of chosen physiological parameters. These increases were more pronounced in Group VI, where 7 mg/mL dose of Ca-ex was applied. Compared to Group IV, which was exposed to carbaryl, Group VI had 17% more germination, 1.89 times more root elongation and 2.96 times more weight gain. These findings are consistent with the limited number of studies examining the effect of carbaryl on various plant species. Sengupta et al.39 reported that 75, 100 and 150 ppm doses of carbaryl decreased root elongation and body weight of Vigna sinensis (L.) Endl. (cowpea) seeds in a dose-dependent manner. Goswami et al.40 found that three different carbaryl concentrations significantly reduced the germination percentage and early seedling growth of Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) seeds. The inducing of physiological delay in growth by carbaryl exposure can be attributed to many mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms include decreased mitotic activity that provides growth and development, disruptions in nutrient and mineral intake, and DNA damage that prevents cell proliferation41,42. In addition, carbaryl indirectly inhibits germination by triggering oxidative stress in plants. It has been observed that free radicals generated by carbaryl exposure inhibit the giberillic acid and abscisic acid pathways during germination43,44.
Table 1.
Protective effects of Ca-ex against the physiological toxicity of carbaryl.
| Groups | Germination (%) | Root length (cm) | Initial weight (g) | Final weight (g) | Weight gain (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 100a | 10.1 ± 0.46a | 15.6 ± 0.65 | 26.7 ± 0.53 | + 11.1a |
| 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex | 100a | 10.2 ± 0.48a | 15.4 ± 0.61 | 27.0 ± 0.43 | + 11.6a |
| 7 mg/mL Ca-ex | 100a | 10.4 ± 0.37a | 15.7 ± 0.76 | 27.2 ± 0.39 | + 11.5a |
| 0.3 µg/L carbaryl | 59d | 3.14 ± 0.22d | 15.8 ± 0.58 | 18.4 ± 0.63 | + 2.60d |
| Carbaryl + 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex | 65c | 4.66 ± 0.35c | 15.3 ± 0.71 | 21.2 ± 0.50 | + 5.90c |
| Carbaryl + 7 mg/mL Ca-ex | 76b | 5.94 ± 0.20b | 15.3 ± 0.63 | 23.0 ± 0.70 | + 7.70b |
The data is displayed as mean ± SD. 10 bulbs were used to measure weight and root length, while 50 bulbs were used to measure germination. In the same column, means denoted by various letters(a-d) are statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Cytogenetic findings
The effects of carbaryl on cell proliferation and MN frequency in A. cepa root meristem cells are given in Table 2. MI is an indicator of cell proliferation and carbaryl caused a significant decrease in MI rate (p < 0.05). 0.3 µg/L carbaryl treatment caused a 22% decrease in the number of dividing cells compared to the control. Low level of MN was detected in control and Ca-ex only groups, which indicates that Ca-ex alone does not induce MN formation. In the 0.3 µg/L carbaryl treated group, a high level (86.6 ± 4.72) was determined. Both the decrease in MI rates and the significant increase in MN frequency indicate the cytotoxic effect of carbaryl. In the groups in which Ca-ex was administered together with carbaryl, MI rates increased again and MN frequency decreased, and these findings indicate the protective effect of Ca-ex. The types and frequencies of CAs induced by carbaryl and Ca-ex treatment are given in (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Low and non-statistical CAs presence was detected in control and Ca-ex only groups (p > 0.05). Carbaryl exposure caused CAs such as vagrant chromosome, sticky chromosome, and unequal distribution of chromatin, fragment, bridge, nucleus bud, disorientation and multipolar anaphase in root meristem cells. Among all CAs, vagrant chromosome formations were detected at the highest frequency and multipolar anaphase at the lowest level. In Group V and Group VI treated with Ca-ex at doses of 3.5 and 7 mg/mL together with carbaryl, significant (p < 0.05) decreases in CAs frequencies were recorded. These improvements in genotoxicity values were found to be more pronounced in Group VI, which received 7 mg/mL Ca-ex. Compared to Group IV exposed to carbaryl, the vagrant chromosome, the most commonly observed CAs, was reduced approximately 1.74-fold in Group VI. Consequently, CAs induced by carbaryl application may have caused cell cycle delays. This delay also explains the decreases in MI and and is also a possible cause of the decreases in root elongation and germination percentage observed in the previous analysis. The regression of genotoxic effects of Ca-ex also positively affected cell proliferation and physiological development.
Table 2.
Effects of carbaryl and Ca-ex applications on MI, MN and CAs frequency.
| CAs types | Control | 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex | 7 mg/mL Ca-ex | 0.3 µg/L carbaryl | Carbaryl + 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex | Carbaryl + 7 mg/mL Ca-ex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI(%) | 906 ± 13.7a (9.06) | 908 ± 13.2a (9.08) | 902 ± 10.7a (8.02) | 703 ± 9.68d (7.03) | 766 ± 10.1c (7.66) | 804 ± 9.57b (8.04) |
| MN | 0.40 ± 0.52d | 0.50 ± 0.53d | 0.20 ± 0.42d | 86.6 ± 4.72a | 72.5 ± 3.47b | 55.1 ± 3.28c |
| VC | 0.40 ± 0.52d | 0.20 ± 0.42d | 0.30 ± 0.48d | 69.6 ± 3.50a | 50.2 ± 3.16b | 39.9 ± 3.90c |
| SC | 0.30 ± 0.48d | 0.52 ± 0.53d | 0.20 ± 0.42d | 60.6 ± 3.27a | 46.8 ± 3.16b | 32.4 ± 2.88c |
| UDC | 0.50 ± 0.53d | 0.30 ± 0.48d | 0.20 ± 0.42d | 51.1 ± 2.96a | 41.1 ± 2.85b | 29.2 ± 3.32c |
| F | NDO | NDO | NDO | 41.5 ± 2.99a | 29.3 ± 2.87b | 20.6 ± 2.01c |
| B | NDO | NDO | NDO | 29.8 ± 2.66a | 20.0 ± 2.54b | 13.2 ± 2.35c |
| NB | NDO | NDO | NDO | 23.5 ± 2.80a | 15.8 ± 1.87b | 10.0 ± 1.41c |
| D | NDO | NDO | NDO | 15.9 ± 1.66a | 10.4 ± 1.51b | 5.20 ± 1.14c |
| MA | NDO | NDO | NDO | 9.90 ± 1.45a | 5.30 ± 1.16b | 3.00 ± 1.05c |
The data is displayed as mean ± SD (n = 10). 1,000 cells were analyzed to determine MN and CAs, and 10,000 cells were analyzed to determine MI. In the same line, means denoted by various letters(a-d) are statistically significant (p < 0.05). MI mitotic index, MN micronucleus, VC vagrant chromosome, SC sticky chromosome, UDC unequal distribution of chromatin, F fragment, B bridge, NB nucleus bud, D disorientation, MA multipolar anaphase. NDO no data observed.
Fig. 1.
CAs caused by carbaryl insecticide. Bar = 10 µm.
Comet analysis is used to detect DNA fragmentation and the results of comet assay are given in Table 3. Group IV that received carbaryl treatment showed significant (p < 0.05) increases in tail DNA percentage and significant (p < 0.05) decreases in head DNA. Compared to the control group, the amount of head DNA decreased by approximately 43% in Group IV and the amount of tail DNA significantly increased. Improvement in comet findings was observed in the groups administered Ca-ex together with carbaryl. Compared to Group IV exposed to carbaryl, head DNA increased by approximately 29% in Group VI exposed to Carbaryl + 7 mg/mL Ca-ex.
Table 3.
Comet data for determining DNA damage.
| Comet parameters | Control | 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex | 7 mg/mL Ca-ex | 0.3 µg/L carbaryl | Carbaryl + 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex | Carbaryl + 7 mg/mL Ca-ex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head diameter (px) | 28.000 | 30.000 | 32.000 | 48.000 | 34.000 | 26.000 |
| Head density | 170.201 | 165.055 | 145.467 | 249.407 | 187.504 | 207.758 |
| Head DNA (%) | 97.5 ± 1.27a | 98.0 ± 1.15a | 98.5 ± 1.43a | 53.6 ± 1.51d | 62.5 ± 1.27c | 82.4 ± 1.71b |
| Tail length (px) | 4.000 | 3.000 | 1.000 | 71.000 | 59.000 | 22.000 |
| Tail density | 4.325 | 3.441 | 2.168 | 216.337 | 112.273 | 44.343 |
| Tail DNA (%) | 2.50 ± 1.27d | 2.00 ± 1.15d | 1.50 ± 1.43d | 46.4 ± 1.51a | 37.5 ± 1.27b | 17.6 ± 1.71c |
| Tail Moment | 0.280823 | 0.212094 | 0.184949 | 21.187 | 13.171 | 2.880 |
The data is displayed as mean ± SD (n = 10). 1,000 cells from each group were examined for DNA damage. In the same line, means denoted by various letters(a-d) are statistically significant (p < 0.05). The percentage of tail DNA served as the basis for the Comet scale, which indicated DNA damage. Damage can be classified as minimal or nonexistent (≤ 5%), low (5–20%), moderate (20–40%), high (40–75%), or severe (≥ 75%).
Genotoxicity findings of this study are in agreement with similar literature studies. Amer and Farah45 reported that carbaryl treatment caused meiotic CAs such as chromosome delay, polyploidy, fragmentation, stickiness and bridging in Vicia faba pollen mother cells. Asita and Hatane46 found that 20 g/kg carbaryl decreased MI and promoted sticky chromosome development. Sarangi47 found that three different doses of carbaryl inhibited MI, increased MN frequency, caused CAs and sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral erythrocytes of Channa punctatus. Meeker et al.48 observed that environmental exposure to carbaryl caused increased DNA damage in human sperm cells. The decreases in MI and head DNA and the increases in the percentage of MN, CA and tail DNA observed in this study indicate the genotoxic effect of carbaryl. The genotoxicity caused by carbaryl exposure can be explained by different mechanisms. The formation of sticky chromosomes may be attributed to carbaryl forming noncovalent bonds with DNA, condensing chromatin fibers and preventing their separation. Fragments or bridges may arise from carbaryl causing DNA double-strand breaks or triggering faulty repair mechanisms. Vagrant chromosomes and unequal chromatin distribution may be related to microtubule disorganization and impaired kinetochore function. Multipolar anaphase and disorientation may be due to carbaryl-induced disruptions in the cytoskeleton and centrosome division. Nuclear buds may be interpreted as an attempt to expel genomic material from the nucleus as a result of DNA damage or excessive replication. Carbaryl-induced oxidative stress also plays an important role in the emergence of chromosomal abnormalities8,48,49. Literature studies also confirm DNA and spindle interactions with carbaryl. Meeker et al.48 found that carbaryl acts as a spindle disrupting agent in Chinese hamster cells and that carbaryl or its metabolic intermediates act directly or indirectly as alkylating agents on DNA bases. Önfelt49 reported that carbaryl is a spindle disrupting agent. The other mechanism is that carbaryl triggers oxidative stress formation by increasing the free radical level in the cell. Fattahi et al.8 reported that carbamate insecticides accelerate free radical formation and induce peroxidation and degradation of intracellular macromolecules. They also found that carbaryl inhibited DNA synthesis and decreased RNA levels, leading to a decrease in protein synthesis.
In this study, carbaryl-DNA interaction was investigated and tried to be elucidated by spectral analysis. The spectroscopic absorption plot of the DNA-carbaryl interaction is given in (Fig. 2). DNA at 0.15 mg/mL has an absorbance value of 1.95 at 260 nm. Addition of different concentrations of carbaryl to the DNA solution caused significant increases in absorption. DNA mixtures containing 0.15, 0.3 and 0.6 µg/L carbaryl had absorbance values of 2.11 ABS, 2.49 ABS and 2.66 ABS at 260 nm, respectively. Increases in absorbance at 260 nm between 8.2% and 36.4% were seen when carbaryl was added to the DNA solution. The gradual increase in absorbance after the addition of carbaryl to the DNA solution indicates a hyperchromic shift. UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy is a popular and efficient technique for studying DNA binding. Following binding of a compound to DNA, it causes changes in the helical structure and steric configuration of DNA. These changes trigger changes in the absorption spectrum. A hyperchromic change, which results a change in absorbance, indicates that carbaryl binds to DNA in an intercalation mode, the formation of a DNA-carbaryl binary complex and damage to the DNA double helix structure50,51. Chemical agents and DNA typically interact non-covalently through a variety of binding mechanisms, including intercalation. Intercalation involves the stacking of agents between DNA double strands in the absence of covalent bonding. This stacking has a promutagenic effect by breaking DNA, unwinding supercoiled DNA and interfering with the ability of DNA to interact with binding and regulatory proteins52. All of these potential modifications to the DNA structure after contact further support the cytotoxic and genotoxic properties of carbaryl. There are similar studies reporting DNA-carbaryl interactions in the literature. Zhang et al.51 observed a 21% increase in absorbance after carbaryl interaction with calf thymus DNA, indicating a hyperchromic and stated that this increase was indicative of DNA damage.
Fig. 2.

Spectral shift observed in DNA-carbaryl interaction.
Biochemical findings
Biochemical changes induced by carbaryl in A. cepa are given in (Fig. 3). Groups I (control), II and III treated only with two different doses of Ca-ex had the highest chlorophyll levels and the lowest MDA, proline, SOD and CAT enzyme activities. The values of the biochemical parameters tested in these groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Exposure to carbaryl resulted in a significant decrease in chlorophyll levels and a significant increase in MDA, proline, SOD and CAT levels (p < 0.05). In comparison with the control group, the levels of MDA increased by 3.06-fold, proline levels increased by 2.65-fold, SOD activity increased by 2.27-fold and CAT activity increased by 2.31-fold in Group IV. Conversely, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b levels exhibited a decline of 59% and 54.8%, respectively. Administration of Ca-ex in combination with carbaryl improved these abnormalities. Similar biochemical changes caused by carbaryl in various organisms have been reported in the literature. Habib et al.53 found that carbaryl exposure caused a decrease in chlorophyll, carotenoid, phycobilin and protein levels and an increase in MDA, SOD, CAT and ascorbate peroxidase activities in Calothrix brevissima, a bacterial species. Tütüncü et al.54 reported that methiocarb, a carbamate pesticide like carbaryl, increased MDA levels and SOD and CAT enzyme activities in A. cepa root cells.
Fig. 3.
C. angustifolia leaf extract’s ability to protect against the biochemical toxicity induced by carbaryl. Group I: Control, Group II: 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex, Group III: 7 mg/mL Ca-ex, Group IV: 0.3 µg/L carbaryl, Group V: Carbaryl + 3.5 mg/mL Ca-ex, Group VI: Carbaryl + 7 mg/mL Ca-ex. The data is displayed as mean ± SD (n = 10). The means denoted by various letters (a–d) are statistically significant (p < 0.05). MDA: µM/g, SOD: U/mg, CAT: OD240nm min/g, Chl a and b: mg/g, proline: (µmole/g).
The biochemical changes exhibited by carbaryl exposure may be explained by the induction of oxidative stress. Önfelt49 showed that carbaryl caused increased lipid peroxidation in V79 Chinese hamster cells. There is also information in the literature that pesticides increase membrane damage by generating ROS and increase MDA levels by causing lipid peroxidation55. The increase in proline levels caused by carbaryl exposure suggests that it is a mechanism developed by the plant for defence against stress. This theory is supported by data in the literature showing that proline accumulation in plants is positively correlated with tolerance to abiotic stress; increases resistance in plants exposed to various stress factors such as salinity, heavy metals and xenobiotics, and is considered a sign of stress sensitivity in plants56. Oxidative stress induced by carbaryl also increases antioxidant enzyme levels. Habib et al.53 reported that many pesticides directly increase radical production and the increases observed in SOD and CAT enzyme activity in the presence of carbaryl are due to the role of these enzymes in free radical scavenging. Carbaryl caused a decrease in photosynthetic pigment levels as well as disturbances in the antioxidant balance of the cell. The decrease in chlorophyll pigment levels may be associated with the change in ion concentration in leaves and inhibition of the synthesis of enzymes involved in chlorophyll synthesis57. Lei et al.58 found a decrease in Na, Ca and K ion concentrations as a result of pesticide exposure and a corresponding decrease in the synthesis of photosynthetic pigments. The results obtained in biochemical analyses are consistent with the physiological and cytogenetic parameter data of this study. Especially the decrease in chlorophyll levels is an important reason for the regression in physiological development. Oxidative stress indicated by increased MDA and proline levels is the main cause of chromosomal abnormalities and decreased cell cycle.
Anatomical findings
The root cells of Group I (control) and Groups II and III, which received two varying dosages of Ca-ex, showed no signs of injury under a microscope. On the other hand, carbaryl treatment caused severe epidermis cell damage, thickening of the cortex cell wall and flattened cell nucleus damage in the root cells of Group IV (Fig. 4). In the root cells of Group V and Group VI, which were treated with Ca-ex at doses of 3.5 and 7 mg/mL together with carbaryl, the severity of the observed damages decreased. This improvement was more pronounced in the root cells of Group VI treated with 7 mg/mL dose of Ca-ex. There is no comprehensive research in the literature on the anatomical damage caused by carbaryl in plant root tip cells. However, there are studies reporting that carbamate pesticides with similar structure induce anatomical damages. Tütüncü et al.54 reported that three different doses of methiocarb, a carbamate insecticide, caused anatomical damages such as necrosis, epidermis cell damage and thickening of the cortex cell wall in A. cepa root meristem cells. Himtaş et al.26 found that permethrin exposure at a dose of 100 µg/mL promoted anatomical damages such as epidermis cell damage, flattened cell nucleus, cortex cell damage, thickening of the cortex cell wall and indistinct conduction tissue in A. cepa root tip meristem cells. Cell wall thickening in root cells may be a morphological defence mechanism developed by the plant to prevent the penetration of carbaryl59,60. Similarly, Çakır et al.61 and Yılmaz et al.62 reported that the passage of chemical agents into the cell was limited by thickening of the cell wall in roots. Microscopic analysis showed a marked increase in the number of cortex and epidermis cells in roots exposed to carbaryl. This alteration increases the contact between the cells, generating mechanical pressure. The epidermis cells and their nuclei can be deformed as a result of this pressure. This claim is supported by the literature indicating that plants develop alkaloids, terpenoids, phytochelatin accumulation63, physical change (increase in cell number and cell layer)25 and morphological adaptation (thickening of the cell wall and indistinction of the conduction tissue)26 as defence against toxic agents. Genomic instabilities and chromosomal alterations detected in cytogenetic analyses and the comet test may be the causes of the observed changes in cell nucleus shape64,65.
Fig. 4.
Appearance and frequencies of meristematic cell damages in 0.3 µg/L carbaryl group. Bar = 10 µm. No damage is denoted by ( −), light damage by ( +), moderate damage by (+ +), and severe damage by (+ + +).
Protective role of Cassia angustifolia
Carbaryl exposure caused negative changes in all selected physiological, cytogenetic, biochemical and anatomical parameters of A. cepa. In this context, germination root elongation, weight gain, MI and chlorophyll levels decreased, while DNA damage, MN and CAs numbers, MDA, proline, SOD and CAT levels increased. 3.5 and 7 mg/mL Ca-ex treatments again caused an improvement in all selected parameters, although not at a level to reach the values of the control group and this effect was more noticeable at 7 mg/mL Ca-ex treatment. Ca-ex showed an increasing ameliorative effect with increasing dose in all parameters. Administration of 3.5 and 7 mg/mL Ca-ex resulted in a 16 and 35% reduction in the frequency of MN induced by carbaryl, respectively. Ca-ex provided 27–42% protection against vagrant chromosome levels, the highest frequency among CAs. Abnormalities identified in cytogenetic analyses were associated with the induction of oxidative stress. The 25–43% decrease in MDA level detected in the carbaryl-treated group indicates that oxidative stress also decreased with Ca-ex application. Briefly, an improvement was observed in all parameters at different rates. The regressive effect of C. angustifolia on carbaryl toxicity is in parallel with the literature studies. Bellassoued et al.66 reported that C. angustifolia leaf extract caused significant reductions in carbon tetrachloride-induced lipid peroxidation in the liver tissues of adult rats, prevented the formation of pathological liver lesions, and had the potential to remove free radicals and alleviate hepatotoxicity. Osman et al.67 showed that C. angustifolia extract reduced oxidative stress in kidney tissue and provided a protective effect against streptozotocin-induced diabetes by reducing blood glucose levels, increasing plasma insulin levels, reducing weight loss and improving renal enzyme levels such as CAT and glutathione (GSH) in diabetic rats. Karajibani et al.18 determined that C. angustifolia exposure in hyperlipidemic male Wistar rats for a brief period of time resulted in a significant drop in blood cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-C levels while increasing HDL-C levels and body weight.
The improvement provided by C. angustifolia leaf extract in selected physiological, cytogenetic, biochemical and anatomical parameter values can be explained by the antioxidant activity and pharmaceutical properties of C. angustifolia. LC–MS/MS chromatogram of phenolic compounds in the structure of C. angustifolia leaf extract is shown in (Fig. 5). As a result of LC–MS/MS analysis, the highest amount of 476.229 µg/g kaempferol and 125.540 µg/g rutin were determined in C. angustifolia leaves. These substances were followed by quercetin > p-coumaric acid > ferulic acid, which were above the level of 10 µg/g. Below 10 µg/g level, benzoic acid > salicylic acid > epicatechin > caffeic acid > vannillin > catechin > naringenin > syringic aldehyde > oleuropein were detected. Kaempferol, most abundant in C. angustifolia leaf extract, has anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-cancer properties68. A flavonoid present in plants including buckwheat, apples, and tea, rutin is the second most prevalent substance in C. angustifolia leaf extract. It has been reported that rutin protects the liver, kidneys, and heart. The primary pharmacological effect of rutin is to increase antioxidant capacity. It also has anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects. In addition, rutin also shows strong metal chelating properties. Thus, it can prevent peroxidation caused by metal ions69. Quercetin is a bioflavonoid, one of the three substances with levels above 10 µg/g. It possesses potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant qualities. It is known to act as an antioxidant against various radicals, especially superoxide radical, lipid peroxyl radical and hydroxyl radical. It has also been reported that quercetin helps in cancer treatment by blocking the flow of nutrients and oxygen to cancerous cells70. The second substance with a level above 10 µg/g is p-coumaric acid, a polyphenol found mainly in plants. Recent studies have reported that p-coumaric acid has antioxidant, antimutagenic, anti-inflammatory, antimelanogenic, antiplatelet, cardioprotective and immunomodulatory properties. It is also known to reduce the growth of cancer cells71. Ferulic acid, the last substance above 10 µg/g, is a water-soluble antioxidant. It participates in the process by which cells scavenge free radicals, or ROS. It also has antiallergic, anti-inflammatory, antihyperlipidemic and hepatoprotective activity72. C. angustifolia leaf extract contains nine other substances whose protective roles are not discussed in detail since their amounts are below 10 µg/g. Among these substances, especially catechins and epicatechins are known to have higher antioxidant power than vitamins, to take an active role in the elimination of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals from cells, and to inhibit the formation and growth of cancer cells73. The protective effects of plant extracts are primarily attributed to their content of various biologically active compounds, especially phenolic substances. The protection exhibited by C. angustifolia against carbaryl-induced toxicity may be associated with the cumulative effects of phenolic compounds identified through LC–MS/MS analysis. Similarly, in the literature, the protective effects of various plant extracts against chemically induced toxicity have also been reported in our previous studies74–78.
Fig. 5.
LC–MS/MS chromatogram and phenolic substance profile of C. angustifolia.
C. angustifolia, which can grow easily without the need for specific cultivation conditions, offers a significant advantage in terms of cost-effectiveness and practical applicability due to its notable toxicity-reducing effects even at low doses. Furthermore, its natural composition prevents secondary toxicity or environmental pollution, making it particularly valuable from an ecological sustainability perspective. In this study, the Allium assay was employed to assess carbaryl-induced toxicity and to evaluate the protective potential of C. angustifolia against this toxicity. As a bioindicator plant containing eukaryotic DNA, Allium cepa provides reliable and consistent results that can serve as early warnings for other biological systems. However, considering its relatively low oxidase enzyme concentrations and limited substrate specificity compared to other organisms, it is crucial to investigate these effects across a broader range of biological models. The findings of this study should be communicated to relevant regulatory authorities to raise awareness and encourage the implementation of necessary measures, particularly concerning pesticide use, within the framework of legal and environmental regulations.
Conclusion
The current study demonstrates that carbaryl exposure causes significant morphotoxic and cytogenotoxic effects in Allium cepa, as evidenced by decreased germination rates, decreased photosynthetic pigment content and mitotic index, and increased levels of oxidative stress, chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei. The results demonstrate that carbaryl exhibits toxicity even at low concentrations, highlighting the environmental risks associated with pesticide overuse and the need for safer and more sustainable practices. Furthermore, Cassia angustifolia extract was found to mitigate the toxic effects of carbaryl, likely due to its antioxidant properties. The use of the Allium test system allows for an integrated assessment of genotoxic, physiological, and anatomical changes, strengthening its applicability in environmental toxicity testing.
However, it is important to note that this study focused solely on plant systems and did not assess the interaction of Cassia angustifolia extract with carbaryl in terms of insecticidal efficacy. Additionally, practical challenges such as formulation complexity, regulatory considerations, and cost implications of incorporating plant extracts into commercial pesticide products must be considered. Future studies should investigate these aspects, particularly the potential antagonistic or synergistic effects of Cassia angustifolia extract on target pests. Despite these limitations, the study provides a strong foundation for further research on natural, plant-based strategies to reduce pesticide-induced toxicity in agroecosystems.
Supplementary Information
Author contributions
A.B: investigation; methodology; visualization; writing-review and editing. E.Y: conceptualization; methodology; data curation; software; visualization; writing—review and editing. K.C: conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; visualization; writing—review.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-16685-z.
References
- 1.Kumar, N., Pathera, A. K., Saini, P. & Kumar, M. Harmful effects of pesticides on human health. Ann. Agri. Bio. Res.17 (2), 125–127 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hashimi, M. H., Hashimi, R. & Ryan, Q. Toxic effects of pesticides on humans, plants, animals, pollinators and beneficial organisms. Asian Plant Res. J.5 (4), 37–47 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ádám, B., Cocco, P. & Godderis, L. Hazardous effects of pesticides on human health. Toxics12 (3), 186 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou, W., Li, M. & Achal, V. A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerg. Contam.11 (1), 100410 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 5.El-Nahhal, I. & El-Nahhal, Y. Pesticide residues in drinking water, their potential risk to human health and removal options. J. Environ. Manag.299, 113611 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Asefa, E. M., Damtew, Y. T. & Ober, J. Pesticide water pollution, human health risks, and regulatory evaluation: a nationwide analysis in Ethiopia. J. Hazard. Mater.478, 135326 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Araújo, M. F., Castanheira, E. M. & Sousa, S. F. The buzz on insecticides: a review of uses, molecular structures, targets, adverse effects, and alternatives. Molecules28 (8), 3641 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fattahi, E., Jorsaraei, S. G. A. & Gardaneh, M. The effect of carbaryl on the pituitary-gonad axis in male rats. Iran. J. Reprod. Med.10 (5), 419–424 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hamid, S., Mahajan, R. & Singh, H. Carbaryl, a pesticide causes «Toxic Hepatitis» in albino rats. J. Cytol. Histol.3, 149 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ware, G. W. The Pesticide Book (Thomson publications, 2000). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Derbalah, A. et al. Carbaryl residue concentrations, degradation, and major sinks in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.27, 14668–14678 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA Announces Multiple Actions to Protect Endangered Species from Insecticide Carbaryl. (2023).
- 13.Isman, M. B. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu. Rev. Entomol.51, 45–66 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muthaiah, V. P. K., Venkitasamy, L., Michael, F. M., Chandrasekar, K. & Venkatachalam, S. Neuroprotective role of naringenin on carbaryl induced neurotoxicity in mouse neuroblastoma cells. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother.4 (3), 192–197 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kutluer, F., Özkan, B., Yalçin, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Direct and indirect toxicity mechanisms of the natural insecticide azadirachtin based on in-silico interactions with tubulin, topoisomerase and DNA. Chemosphere364, 143006 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saroop, S. & Tamchos, S. Impact of pesticide application: positive and negative side. In Pesticides in a Changing Environment (eds Sharma, A. et al.) (Elsevier, 2024). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sooksawata, N. et al. Phytoremediation potential of sunn hemp for carbaryl-contaminated soil. Sci. Asia.50 (5), 2024089 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ahmed, S. I. et al. Pharmacologically active flavonoids from the anticancer, antioxidant and antimicrobial extracts of Cassia angustifolia Vahl. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.16 (1), 1–9 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khare, P. et al. Neuroprotective effect of Cassia angustifolia leaf extract against colchicine: an experimental study on cognitive dysfunction and biochemical alterations in mice. Eur. Chem. Bull.12 (10), 9431–9445 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karajibani, M. et al. The effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Senna (Cassiaangustifolia Vahl.) on lipid profiles in hyperlipidemic rats. J. Nutr. Food Secur.8 (1), 1–8 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kesti Usta, S., Yalçın, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Synergistic and antagonistic contributions of main components to the bioactivity profile of Anethumgraveolens extract. Sci. Rep.15 (1), 21465 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanyika-Mbewe, C., Thole, B., Makwinja, R. & Kaonga, C. C. Monitoring of carbaryl and cypermethrin concentrations in water and soil in Southern Malawi. Environ. Monit. Assess.192, 1–14 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Akgeyik, A. U., Yalçın, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Phytochemical fingerprint and biological activity of raw and heat-treated Ornithogalum umbellatum. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 13733 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ayhan, B. S. et al. A comprehensive analysis of royal jelly protection against cypermethrin-induced toxicity in the model organism Allium cepa L., employing spectral shift and molecular docking approaches. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.203, 105997 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pehlivan, Ö. C., Cavuşoğlu, K., Yalçin, E. & Acar, A. In silico interactions and deep neural network modeling for toxicity profile of methyl methanesulfonate. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.30 (55), 117952–117969 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Himtaş, D., Yalçin, E., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Acar, A. In-vivo and in-silico studies to identify toxicity mechanisms of permethrin with the toxicity-reducing role of ginger. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.31 (6), 9272–9287 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sharma, A. D., Gill, P. K. & Singh, P. DNA isolation from dry and fresh samples of polysaccharide-rich plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.20, 415–415 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Coşkun, F., Yalçın, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Metronidazole promotes oxidative stress and DNA fragmentation-mediated myocardial injury in albino mice. Chemosphere352, 141382 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dikilitaş, M. & Koçyiğit, A. Analysis of DNA damage in organizms via single cell gel electrophoresis (technical note): comet assay method. J. Fac. Agric. Harran Univ.14 (2), 77–89 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pereira, C. S. A. et al. Evaluation of DNA damage induced by environmental exposure to mercury in Liza aurata using the comet assay. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.58, 112–122 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kesti, S., Macar, O., Kalefetoğlu Macar, T., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Yalçın, E. Investigation of the protective role of Ginkgobiloba L. against phytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative damage induced by trifloxystrobin. Sci. Rep.14, 19937 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaya, M., Çavuşoğlu, K., Yalçin, E. & Acar, A. DNA fragmentation and multifaceted toxicity induced by high-dose vanadium exposure determined by the bioindicator Allium test. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 8493 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tümer, C., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Yalçin, E. Screening the toxicity profile and genotoxicity mechanism of excess manganese confirmed by spectral shift. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 20986 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Witham, F. H., Blaydes, D. R. & Devlin, R. M. Experiments in plant physiology 1–11 (Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Topatan, Z. Ş et al. Alleviatory efficacy of Achilleamillefolium L. in etoxazole-mediated toxicity in Alliumcepa L.. Sci. Rep.14 (1), 31674 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Macar, O., Kalefetoğlu Macar, T., Yalçın, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Acute multiple toxic effects of Trifloxystrobin fungicide on Allium cepa L.. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 15216 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Demirtaş, G., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Yalçin, E. Aneugenic, clastogenic, and multi-toxic effects of diethyl phthalate exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.27 (5), 5503–5510 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Altunkaynak, F., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Yalçin, E. Detection of heavy metal contamination in Batlama Stream (Turkiye) and the potential toxicity profile. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 11727 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sengupta, P. K., Chakrabarti, A. & Banerjee, S. K. Carbaryl toxicity in germinating seeds of Vigna sinensis: Effect of gibberellic acid supplementation. Curr. Sci.57 (8), 415–417 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goswami, M. R., Banerjee, P., Swarnakar, S. & Mukhopadhyay, A. Studies on the effect of application of carbaryl insecticide on alfalfa (Medicagosativa L.). Int. J. Eng. Sci. Math.7, 67–73 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Saylan, M., Yüzbaşıoğlu, E., Dalyan, E., Akpinar, I. & Unal, M. Genotoxicity and antioxidant enzyme activities induced by the captan fungicide in the root of bell pepper (Capsicumannuum L. var grossum L. cv Kandil). Trak. Univ. J. Nat. Sci.20 (2), 97–103 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alengebawy, A., Abdelkhalek, S. T., Qureshi, S. R. & Wang, M. Q. Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics9 (3), 42 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Saladin, G. & Clément, C. Physiological side effects of pesticides on non-target plants. In Agriculture and Soil Pollution: New Research (ed. Livingston, J. V.) (Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2005). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yirmibeş, F., Yalçin, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Protective role of green tea against paraquat toxicity in Alliumcepa L.: physiological, cytogenetic, biochemical, and anatomical assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (16), 23794–23805 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Amer, S. M. & Farah, O. R. Cytological effects of pesticides III. Meiotic effects of N-methyl-1-naphthyl carbamate “Sevin”. Cytologia33 (3–4), 337–344 (1968). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Asita, A. O. & Hatane, B. H. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of some agropesticides used in Southern Africa. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci.4 (10), 175–184 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sarangi, P. K. Cytogenotoxic effects of carbaryl (Sevin) in Channa punctatus in vivo. Int. J. Sci. Res. 473–477 (2020).
- 48.Meeker, J. D. et al. Urinary levels of insecticide metabolites and DNA damage in human sperm. Hum. Reprod.19 (11), 2573–2580 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Önfelt, A. Spindle disturbances in mammalian cells. I. changes in the quantity of free sulfhydryl groups in relation to survival and c-mitosis in V79 Chinese hamster cells after treatment with colcemid, diamide, carbaryl and methyl mercury. Chem. Biol. Interact.46 (2), 201–217 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shi, S. et al. Synthesis, characterization and DNA-binding of novel chiral complexes Δ-and Λ-[Ru (bpy) 2L] 2+(L= o-mopip and p-mopip). J. Inorg. Biochem.100 (3), 385–395 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang, G., Hu, X. & Fu, P. Spectroscopic studies on the interaction between carbaryl and calf thymus DNA with the use of ethidium bromide as a fluorescence probe. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B.108, 53–61 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guengerich, F.P. Base intercalation in DNA in Molecular Life Sciences Wells. R. D., Bond, J. S., Klinman, J. & Masters. B.S.S. (eds) 45–46 (New York, 2014).
- 53.Habib, K., Kumar, S., Manikar, N., Zutshi, S. & Fatma, T. Biochemical effect of carbaryl on oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes and osmolytes of cyanobacterium Calothrix brevissima. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.87, 615–620 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tütüncü, E., Yalçin, E., Acar, A., Yapar, K. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Investigation of the toxic effects of a carbamate insecticide methiocarb in Alliumcepa L.. Cytologia84 (2), 113–117 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Macar, O., Kalefetoğlu Macar, T., Çavuşoğlu, K., Yalçın, E. & Acar, A. Assessing the combined toxic effects of metaldehyde mollucide. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 4888 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pathak, V. M. et al. Current status of pesticide effects on environment, human health and it’s eco-friendly management as bioremediation: a comprehensive review. Front. Microbiol.13, 2833 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Prasad, S. M., Kumar, D. & Zeeshan, M. Growth, photosynthesis, active oxygen species and antioxidants responses of paddy field cyanobacterium Plectonemaboryanum to endosulfan stress. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.51 (2), 115–123 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lei, M. et al. Pesticide-induced physiological, metabolic and ultramorphological alterations in leaves of young maize seedlings. Pol. J. Environ. Stud.29 (3), 2247–2258 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yalçin, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Spectroscopic contribution to glyphosate toxicity profile and the remedial effects of Momordica charantia. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 20020 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kuloğlu, S. S., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Yalçın, E. LC–MS/MS phenolic profileand remedial role of Urtica dioica extract against Li2CO3-induced toxicity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.31 (42), 54589–54602 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Çakir, F., Kutluer, F., Yalçin, E., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Acar, A. Deep neural network and molecular docking supported toxicity profile of prometryn. Chemosphere340, 139962 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yılmaz, H., Kalefetoğlu Macar, T., Macar, O., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Yalçın, E. DNA fragmentation, chromosomal aberrations, and multi-toxic effects induced by nickel and the modulation of Ni-induced damage by pomegranate seed extract in Alliumcepa L.. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res.30 (51), 110826–110840 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mithöfer, A. & Maffei, M. E. General mechanisms of plant defense and plant toxins. In Plant Toxins (eds Gopalakrishnakone, P. et al.) (Springer, 2016). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dahl, K. N., Ribeiro, A. J. & Lammerding, J. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ. Res.102 (11), 1307–1318 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dauer, W. T. & Worman, H. J. The nuclear envelope as a signaling node in development and disease. Dev. Cell.17 (5), 626–638 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bellassoued, K. et al. Antioxidant and hepatopreventive effects of Cassiaangustifolia extract against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Arch. Physiol. Biochem.127 (6), 486–496 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Osman, N. N. et al. Role of senna, Cassia angustifolia and fennel, Foeniculum vulgare in ameliorating nephropathy in diabetic rats. Biosc. Biotech. Res. Comm.15 (1), 208-216 (2022).
- 68.Sharma, N., Biswas, S., Al-Dayan, N., Alhegaili, A. S. & Sarwat, M. Antioxidant role of kaempferol in prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Antioxidants10 (9), 1419 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rahmani, S., Naraki, K., Roohbakhsh, A., Hayes, A. W. & Karimi, G. The protective effects of rutin on the liver, kidneys, and heart by counteracting organ toxicity caused by synthetic and natural compounds. Food Sci. Nutr.11 (1), 39–56 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Çakır, O. & Özdemir, İ. The investigation of protective effect of quercetin in rats exposed to oxidative stress by 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem.47 (1), 61–66 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 71.Navaneethan, D. & Rasool, M. p-Coumaric acid, a common dietary polyphenol, protects cadmium chloride-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Ren. Fail.36 (2), 244–251 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gezer, A., Yakut, S., Bargutalp, N. K. & Gencer, B. T. Protective role of ferulic acid on acrylamide-induced testis toxicity in rats. J. Exp. Clin. Med.40 (4), 740–747 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tosun, İ & Karadeniz, B. The antioxidant activities of tea and tea phenolics. J. of Fac. of Agric. OMU20 (1), 78–83 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gündüz, A., Yalçın, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Combined toxic effects of aflatoxin B2 and the protective role of resveratrol in Swiss albino mice. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 18081 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kutluer, F., Güç, İ, Yalçın, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Toxicity of environmentally relevant concentration of esfenvalerate and Taraxacumofficinale application to overcome toxicity: A multi-bioindicator ın-vivo study. Environ. Pollut.373, 126111 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Macar, O., Kalefetoğlu Macar, T., Çavuşoğlu, K., Yalçın, E. & Yapar, K. Lycopene: an antioxidant product reducing dithane toxicity in Alliumcepa L. Sci Rep.13 (1), 2290 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Güç, İ, Yalçin, E., Çavuşoğlu, K. & Acar, A. Toxicity mechanisms of aflatoxin M1 assisted with molecular docking and the toxicity-limiting role of trans-resveratrol. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 14471 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Aydin, D., Yalçin, E. & Çavuşoğlu, K. Metal chelating and anti-radical activity of Salvia officinalis in the ameliorative effects against uranium toxicity. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 15845 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.






