Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Rev. 2026 Jun 26;106(4):2521–2578. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00005.2026

Catecholamine metabolism revisited: From neurochemistry to integrative physiology and pathophysiology

David S Goldstein 1, Graeme Eisenhofer 2
PMCID: PMC13401249  NIHMSID: NIHMS2191758  PMID: 42359916

Abstract

After a previous overview published more than 20 years ago, key aspects of catecholamine metabolism remain incompletely understood by physiologists. Meanwhile, the repertoire of assayable catecholamine-related compounds has expanded. Moreover, alterations in catecholamine metabolic patterns associated with physiological changes, drug effects, and pathophysiological states were not covered; and biochemical phenotyping via kinetic models now makes it possible to elucidate physiology and pathophysiology in individuals. Accordingly, this review starts with the inventory of catecholamine-related compounds and the three main peripheral catecholamine systems (sympathoneuronal, adrenomedullary, and autocrine/paracrine). Catecholamine systems contribute to virtually every organ function, behavior, and emotional state, and we describe situations where alterations in those systems exert syndromic pathophysiological effects. We then describe the relationships of catecholamine metabolic patterns to synthesis, storage, release, reuptake, and intra-neuronal and extra-neuronal metabolism of catecholamines; effects of physiological processes and drugs on those patterns; and catecholamine biochemical patterns associated with pathophysiologic states. We provide examples of how detailed, comprehensive knowledge acquired over the past half century has led to computational models for estimating the rates of processes that characterize specific physiological changes and some clinical disorders. The integrative physiological approach presented here has the potential to pinpoint specific functional abnormalities within catecholaminergic cells and thereby rationalize novel, testable treatment and prevention strategies.

Keywords: catecholamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, metabolism

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2191758-f0012.jpg

I. INTRODUCTION

The catecholamines dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine are among the most intensively studied signaling molecules in physiology. Their roles as neurotransmitters, hormones, and autocrine–paracrine mediators were central to the emergence of modern concepts of neuroeffector transmission, stress responses, and homeostatic regulation.

More than two decades have passed since our prior comprehensive overview of catecholamine metabolism (1). In the interval the field has expanded substantially in both analytical capability and conceptual scope. Several developments have motivated a renewed, integrative synthesis. First, the repertoire of assayable catecholamine-related compounds has grown markedly, encompassing not only the parent amines but also deaminated, O-methylated, sulfoconjugated, and cysteinylated metabolites measurable in plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue. Some now quantifiable products of intermediary metabolism of catecholamines are toxic and may play pathophysiological roles in diseases (autotoxicity). Moreover, advances in kinetic and isotope-dilution methodologies have enabled detailed estimation of rates of synthesis, release, reuptake, vesicular storage, and intra-neuronal metabolism in humans in vivo, moving the field beyond static concentration measurements and providing physiologically meaningful information about intracellular processes and system-level regulation. Finally, analyses of catecholamine metabolomic patterns can pinpoint specific abnormalities or patterns of abnormalities in catecholaminergic cells, aiding clinical diagnosis and generating pathophysiologically relevant experimental therapeutic hypotheses.

Peripheral catecholaminergic signaling is organized into three major systems—the sympathetic noradrenergic system, the sympathetic adrenergic (adrenomedullary) system, and autocrine–paracrine systems such as the renal DOPA–dopamine axis—each distinguished by cellular origin, modes of release, and regulatory architecture. These systems are inherently integrative and interact dynamically with neuroendocrine, immune, and central neural networks, forming what can be viewed as an “extended autonomic system” that supports both moment-to-moment homeostasis and longer-term adaptive responses (2, 3). Central catecholaminergic systems, although anatomically segregated by projection fields and transmitter phenotypes, are complexly coupled to peripheral catecholamine dynamics through descending neural pathways and neuroendocrine outputs rather than by direct biochemical exchange (4, 5).

Traditional physiological interpretations have often treated catecholamine responses as essentially reactive outputs proportional to the magnitude of a stressor. More recent work emphasizes anticipatory, feed-forward, and history-dependent regulation—captured conceptually by the theory of allostasis (69)—without implying discrete anatomical controllers or fixed set points. In this view, stability emerges from distributed, adaptive processes whose parameters can change with age, experience, and disease. Catecholamine metabolomic patterns provide a uniquely powerful window into these processes, because the relevant enzymes and transporters occupy defined intracellular compartments, allowing biochemical signatures to be mapped onto specific functional alterations (10).

We begin this review with an inventory of the catecholamines, their metabolites, and the enzymatic pathways that generate them. We examine catecholamine neuroeffector functions, including local and long-distance feedback regulation, differential receptor signaling, and cotransmission. Building on this foundation, we describe how characteristic metabolomic patterns relate to defined intracellular processes—synthesis, vesicular storage, leakage, reuptake, and metabolism—and how these patterns are modified by physiological states, pharmacological interventions, and pathophysiological conditions. Finally, we illustrate how quantitative integration of these relationships has enabled computational modeling approaches that estimate rates of key intra-neuronal processes (11, 12), providing a framework for biochemical phenotyping with potential implications for prognosis, treatment, and prevention.

This work aims to advance catecholamine neurochemistry by developing a coherent, testable framework linking metabolic patterns to integrative physiological function. Emphasizing pattern recognition, kinetic analysis, and systems-level interpretation, it provides tools to understand how three closely related molecules exert broad and persistent effects on human physiology and disease.

II. CATECHOLAMINES AND THEIR METABOLITES

II.1. Repertoires of catecholamine-related biochemicals

The number of known catecholamine metabolites exceeds by far that of the three parent compounds, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine (Tables 1 and 2, Figures 15). Figures 1 and 2 provide overviews of the main known metabolic pathways. Figures 35 separately depict dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine metabolic steps. We refer the reader to these Figures as we review below the enzymes and co-factors responsible for the synthesis and metabolic fate of the catecholamines.

Table 1:

Catecholamines and their metabolites

N Biochemical Abbreviation MW Precursor Enzyme Co-factors Other Other
1 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine DOPA 197.2 Tyr TH BH4, Fe+2 Oxygen
2 DOPA-quinone DOPA-Q 195.2 Tyr Tyr-ase Cu+2 Oxygen In melanocytes
3 3-Methoxytyrosine 3-MTyr 181.2 DOPA COMT SAMe
4 5-S-CysteinylDOPA Cys-DOPA 300.3 DOPA GST Glutathione Cysteine Dipeptidases
5 Dopamine
Leukaminochrome
DA
LAC
153.2
151.2
DOPA
DA
LAAAD
(Spontaneous)
Vit. B6 Reduction of ACM
6 3-Methoxytyramine 3-MT 167.2 DA COMT SAMe
7 3-Methoxytyramine-sulfate
Aminochrome
3-MT-S
ACM
248.3
148.1
3-MT
DA
SULT1A3
(Spontaneous)
PAPS Sulfate
Oxygen
8 5-S-Cysteinyldopamine
Dopamine-quinone
Cys-DA
DA-Q
284.3
151.2
DA
DA
GST
(Spontaneous)
Glutathione Cysteine
Oxygen
Dipeptidases
9 Dopamine sulfate
5,6-Dihydroxyindole
DA-S
DHI
233.2
149.2
DA
DA
SULT1A3
(Spontaneous)
PAPS Sulfate In gut
10 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde DOPAL 152.2 DA MAO FAD Oxygen
11 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid DOPAC 168.1 DOPAL ALDH NAD+
12 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethanol
DOPAL-quinone
DOPET
DOPAL-Q
154.2
151.2
DOPAL
DOPAL
AR
(Spontaneous)
NADPH
Oxygen
13 5-S-CysteinylDOPAC Cys-DOPAC 271.3 DOPAC GST Cysteine Dipeptidases
14 Homovanillic acid HVA 182.2 DOPAC COMT SAMe
15 Homovanillic acid-sulfate HVA-S 263.3 HVA SULT1A3 PAPS Sulfate
16 Norepinephrine NE 169.2 DA DBH Cu+2, Vit. C Oxygen VMAT, ATP
17 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde DOPEGAL 167.2 NE MAO FAD Oxygen
18 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycol DHPG 170.2 DOPEGAL AR NADPH
19 3,4-Dihydroxymandelic acid DHMA 184.2 DOPEGAL ALDH NAD+
20 Epinephrine EPI 183.2 NE PNMT SAMe
21 Normetanephrine NMN 183.2 NE COMT SAMe
22 Metanephrine MN 197.2 EPI COMT
23 DHPG-sulfate DHPG-S 263.2 DHPG SULT1A3 PAPS Sulfate In liver
24 Epinephrine sulfate EPI-S 263.3 EPI SULT1A3 PAPS Sulfate In liver
25 Norepinephrine sulfate NE-S 249.2 NE SULT1A3 PAPS Sulfate In liver
26 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol MHPG 199.2 DHPG COMT SAMe
27 MHPG-sulfate MHPG-S 279.2 MHPG SULT1A3 PAPS In liver
28 Vanillylmandelic acid VMA 196.2 MHPG ADH, ALDH In liver
29 Normetanephrine sulfate NMN-S 263.3 NMN SULT1A3 PAPS Sulfate
30 Metanephrine sulfate MN-S 277.3 MN SULT1A3 PAPS Sulfate
31 Homovanillyl alcohol MOPET 168.2 DOPET COMT SAMe

Table 2:

Relationships of catecholamine metabolic patterns with enzymatic reactions and transporters

Biochemical Abbreviation Number TH LAAAD COMT SULT1A3 MAO ALDH AR DBH Vesicular uptake Exocytosis NET (Uptake-1) OCT3 (Uptake-2)
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine DOPA 1 (457) (458) (459)
DOPA-quinone DOPA-Q 2
3-Methoxytyrosine 3-MTyr 3 (460) (458) (459)
5-S-CysteinylDOPA Cys-DOPA 4 (460) (458) (459)
Dopamine DA 5 (457) (458) (459) (47) (241) (461) (462) (306)
3-Methoxytyramine 3-MT 6 (459)
3-Methoxytyramine-sulfate 3-MT-S 7 (459)
5-S-Cysteinyldopamine Cys-DA 8 (241)
Dopamine sulfate DA-S 9
3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde DOPAL 10 (241) (463)
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid DOPAC 11 (464) (241) (463) (462)
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethanol DOPET 12 (241)
5-S-CysteinylDOPAC Cys-DOPAC 13
Homovanillic acid HVA 14 (241)
Homovanillic acid-sulfate HVA-S 15
Norepinephrine NE 16 (457) (458) (459) (308) (241) (461) (462) (276) (363)
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde DOPEGAL 17
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycol DHPG 18 (464) (462)
3,4-Dihydroxymandelic acid DHMA 19
Epinephrine EPI 20 (457) (459) (241) (461)
Normetanephrine NMN 21
Metanephrine MN 22
DHPG-sulfate DHPG-S 23
Epinephrine sulfate EPI-S 24
Norepinephrine sulfate NE-S 25
3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol MHPG 26 (241) (35) (461)
MHPG-sulfate MHPG-S 27 (461)
Vanillylmandelic acid VMA 28 (241) (35) (461)

Bold text indicates effects of increased activities and italic text decreased activities of enzymatic reactions or transporters.

Figure 1: Overview of catecholamines and their metabolites.

Figure 1:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: 3-MT=3-methoxytyramine; 3-MT-S=3-methoxytyramine-sulfate; 3-MTyr=3-methoxytyrosine; ACM=aminochrome; ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; Cys-DOPA=5-S-cysteinylDOPA; Cys-DOPAC=5-S-cysteinylDOPAC; DA=dopamine; DA-Q=dopamine-quinone; DA-S=dopamine sulfate; DBH=dopamine-beta-hydroxylase; DHI=5,6-dihydroxyindole; DHMA=3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DHPG-S=DHPG-sulfate; DOPA=3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DOPA-Q=DOPA-quinone; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; DOPAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde; DOPAL-Q=DOPAL-quinone; DOPEGAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde; DOPET=3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol; EPI=epinephrine; EPI-S=epinephrine sulfate; HVA=homovanillic acid; HVA-S=homovanillic acid-sulfate; LAAAD=L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase; LAC=leukaminochrome; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; MHPG-S=MHPG-sulfate; MN=metanephrine; MN-S=metanephrine sulfate; NE=norepinephrine; NE-S=norepinephrine sulfate; NMN=normetanephrine; NMN-S=normetapnephrine sulfate; PNMT=phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase; SULT1A3=phenolsulfotransferase 1A3; TH=tyrosine hydroxylase; Tyr-ase=tyrosinase; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid

Figure 5: Epinephrine metabolic pathways.

Figure 5:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Red numbers= epinephrine-related; purple numbers=both norepinephrine- and epinephrine-related. Abbreviations: ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; DHMA=3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DOPEGAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; MN-Sulfate=metanephrine sulfate; NAD+=nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, oxidized form; PAPS=3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate; SAMe=S-adenosylmethionine; SULT1A3=phenolsulfotransferase 1A3; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid.

Figure 2: Overview of catecholamine metabolism.

Figure 2:

Figure adapted from (13). Arrow thicknesses indicate relative predominances of alternative pathways. Not shown are reactions involving sulfoconjugation or some intermediary metabolites. Abbreviations: 3-MT=3-methoxytyramine; ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; DA=dopamine; DBH=dopamine-beta-hydroxylase; DHMA=3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; DOPET=3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol; EPI=epinephrine; HVA=homovanillic acid; LAAAD=L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; MOPET=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethanol (homovanillyl alcohol); MN=metanephrine; NE=norepinephrine; NMN=normetanephrine; PNMT=phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid

Figure 3: Dopamine metabolic pathways.

Figure 3:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Green numbers=dopamine-related; blue numbers=norepinephrine-related. Abbreviations: ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; Cys-DOPAC=5-S-cysteinylDOPAC; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; DOPAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde; DOPAL-Q=DOPAL-quinone; DOPET=3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol; HVA=homovanillic acid; HVA-S=homovanillic acid-sulfate; LAAAD=L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MOPET=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethanol; NAD+=nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, oxidized form; NADPH=nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form; PAPS=3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate; SAMe=S-adenosylmethionine; SULT1A3=phenolsulfotransferase 1A3.

II.1.1. Enzymes

Tyrosine hydroxylase

Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the initial and rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis (14). The enzyme catalyzes the hydroxylation of L-tyrosine to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), with tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) a required co-factor for the reaction (15). Also necessary are molecular oxygen and ferrous iron. TH activity is controlled by several mechanisms—substrate and co-factor availability, end-product feedback inhibition by catecholamines that bind to the enzyme and reduce activity, and post-translational modification, particularly phosphorylation of serine residues (1620).

L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase (LAAAD)

L-Aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (LAAAD, also known as DOPA decarboxylase, DDC) catalyzes the decarboxylation of DOPA to form dopamine (21). LAAAD activity depends on pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP), which is vitamin B6 (22).

Monoamine oxidase (MAO)

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent mitochondrial enzyme that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of catecholamines and serotonin to aldehydes—3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL) from dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL) from NE and EPI, and 5-hydroxyindoleacetaldehyde (5-HIAL) from serotonin (23). Two isoforms of MAO, MAO-A and MAO-B, are encoded by distinct genes on the X-chromosome (24, 25). Both isoforms are localized to the outer mitochondrial membrane. MAO-A is relatively abundant in catecholaminergic neurons and peripheral tissues such as the liver and gut; MAO-B is prominent in glial cells and platelets. Sympathetic nerves express mainly MAO-A (26). MAO-A is more active than MAO-B in metabolizing dopamine and NE (27). Because both MAO isoforms deaminate dopamine more efficiently than NE, and since sympathetic nerves express mainly MAO-A, catecholaminergic neurons are especially vulnerable to intra-neuronal dopamine oxidation and downstream catecholaldehyde formation, a key concept in the catecholaldehyde hypothesis of neurodegeneration (28).

Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH)

Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH) is copper-dependent monooxygenase that catalyzes the conversion of dopamine to NE (29). Uniquely among catecholamine-synthetic enzymes, DBH is localized to synaptic vesicles and chromaffin granules (30), so its activity depends on prior uptake of dopamine from the cytoplasm. DBH requires molecular oxygen, ascorbate as an electron donor, and copper as an essential co-factor. The enzyme is non-specific and beta-hydroxylates a wide variety of phenylethylamines derivatives including tyramine (forming octopamine) and amphetamine (forming norephedrine).

Phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PNMT)

Phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PNMT) catalyzes the conversion of norepinephrine to epinephrine by N-methylating the amine group using S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) as the methyl donor (31). Since PNMT is a cytosolic enzyme, norepinephrine must be available in the cytosol to be methylated to epinephrine; this is generally thought to require leakage or efflux of norepinephrine from chromaffin storage vesicles, followed by vesicular uptake of the newly formed epinephrine. PNMT expression is strongly regulated by glucocorticoids delivered to the adrenal medulla via the intra-adrenal portal circulation.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) transfers a methyl group from S-adenosyl-methionine (SAMe) onto catecholamines, converting them to O-methylated metabolites (methoxytyramine from dopamine, normetanephrine (NMN) from NE, and metanephrine (MN) from EPI (32). COMT also metabolizes DHPG to form MHPG (33).

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)

Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) are a family of NAD+-dependent enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acids. In catecholamine metabolism, ALDH1A1 and ALDH2 play critical roles by converting DOPAL to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) (34). ALDH also catalyzes the conversion of NE to the minor metabolite 3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid (DHMA) (1, 35). ALDHs are localized in both the cytosol (ALDH1A1) and mitochondria (ALDH2) of catecholaminergic neurons.

Aldehyde reductase (AR)

Aldehyde reductase (AR), also known as aldo-keto reductase family 1 member A1 (AKR1A1), is a NADPH-dependent cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of a wide range of endogenous and exogenous aldehydes to their corresponding alcohols (36). In catecholamine metabolism, AR converts the DOPAL to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol (DOPET) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL) to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG). AR is far more efficient in metabolizing DOPEGAL to DHPG than DOPAL to DOPET (36, 37).

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), a zinc-dependent, NAD+-requiring oxidoreductase, participates in the conversion of the glycol MHPG to the acid VMA (38, 39), especially in the liver (40, 41). The immediate product of ADH acting on MHPG is an aldehyde that is rapidly metabolized to VMA by ALDH. Analogously, ADH metabolizes the dietary alcohol hydroxytyrosol (synonymous with DOPET) found in olives to DOPAL, which is converted efficiently to DOPAC by ALDH. The 2-step series of ADH and ALDH explains why after eating olives there is a large increase in plasma DOPAC (42). After ethanol ingestion, the same enzymatic series produces acetaldehyde, which is metabolized to acetate.

Phenolsulfotransferase (PST)

Monoamine-preferring phenolsulfotransferase (PST), also known as SULT1A3 (previously termed M-PST), is a cytosolic sulfotransferase enzyme that catalyzes the sulfate conjugation of catecholamines—notably dopamine, NE, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin)—using 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) as the universal sulfate donor (43). SULT1A3 is expressed primarily in the intestinal mucosa and brain (44) and little if at all in adrenal medulla. A variety of catecholamine metabolites are sulfoconjugated by SULT1A3 (Figs. 24).

Figure 4: Norepinephrine metabolic pathways.

Figure 4:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Blue numbers= norepinephrine-related; purple numbers=both norepinephrine- and epinephrine-related. Abbreviations: ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; DHMA=3,4-dihydroxymandelic acid; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DOPEGAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; NAD+=nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, oxidized form; NMN-Sulfate=normetapnephrine sulfate; PAPS=3’-phosphoadenosine-5’-phosphosulfate; SAMe=S-adenosylmethionine; SULT1A3=phenolsulfotransferase 1A3; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid.

Virtually all of circulating dopamine is conjugated (45, 46). Conjugated dopamine can be deconjugated by arylsulfatase to generate free dopamine, which might play a physiological role in heart failure (47) or a pathophysiological role in pseudopheochromocytoma (48); however, there has been little if any recent research on the clinical significance of deconjugation of DA-S.

II.1.2. Co-factors

Tetrahydrobiopterin

Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) is a pteridine co-factor required for the activity of aromatic amino acid hydroxylases—TH, tryptophan hydroxylase, and phenylalanine hydroxylase—as well as nitric oxide synthases (49). In catecholamine biosynthesis, BH4 donates electrons to TH for the hydroxylation of L-tyrosine to L-DOPA. BH4 is synthesized de novo from guanosine triphosphate (GTP) through the sequential actions of GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH1), 6-pyruvoyltetrahydropterin synthase (PTPS), and sepiapterin reductase (SPR). BH4 levels are maintained by salvage and regeneration pathways involving pterin-4a-carbinolamine dehydratase (PCD) and dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR), which recycle oxidized pterins back to BH4 (15).

Pyridoxal phosphate (PRP)

As noted above, PRP is a required co-factor for LAAAD (22).

S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe)

S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) is a universal methyl donor that plays a central role in catecholamine metabolism by providing the methyl group for COMT–mediated inactivation of catecholamines and their metabolites (50). SAMe is an example of a nucleotide-derived co-factor, since it is synthesized from ATP and methionine. COMT transfers a methyl group from SAM to a hydroxyl group on the catechol ring of dopamine, NE, EPI, DOPAC, and DHPG, forming the corresponding O-methylated products such as MHPG and homovanillic acid (HVA). COMT activity consumes significant amounts of SAMe in tissues with high catecholamine turnover, such as liver, kidney, and brain (51). SAMe is also the methyl group donor for N-methylation of norepinephrine to form epinephrine via PNMT.

NAD+

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is a redox coenzyme that functions as an electron carrier in metabolic pathways involved in catecholamine metabolism and mitochondrial energy production. Within catecholaminergic neurons, NAD+ serves as an essential co-factor for aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1 and ALDH2), which oxidize the dopamine metabolite DOPAL to DOPAC (52). ALDH-catalyzed oxidation of DOPAL requires NAD+ as an electron acceptor. Since mitochondrial complex 1 generates NAD+, blockade of complex 1 by the metabolic toxin rotenone decreases ALDH activity (53) and increases endogenous DOPAL levels (54).

Ascorbate

Ascorbate is required as an electron donor to maintain the active-site copper of DBH in the reduced Cu+ state, thereby enabling oxygen activation and beta-hydroxylation of dopamine. Without reduction of copper by ascorbate, O2 would not be productively bound or reduced, and DBH would remain catalytically inactive despite the presence of substrate and oxygen (55). DBH is the only step in catecholamine synthesis or metabolism with a direct, mechanistic requirement for ascorbate.

Mg++

Mg++ is required for ATP-dependent reactions and for enzymes that use nucleotide co-factors—notably COMT, where Mg++ stabilizes binding of SAMe with the catechol substrate, enabling efficient O-methylation. Mg++ is not required for PNMT activity, since the methylation occurs at the terminal amine group of norepinephrine, not at the catechol nucleus.

Fe++

Ferrous iron is the essential catalytic metal for TH. Fe++, together with tetrahydrobiopterin, enables activation of molecular oxygen and hydroxylation. Loss or oxidation of Fe++ to Fe+++ renders TH inactive. Consequently, by chelating the essential Fe++ co-factor, divalent cation–scavenging agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) decrease TH activity.

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form (NADPH)

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, reduced form (NADPH) serves as a reducing equivalent in catecholamine metabolism. It is required for aldehyde/aldose reductase (AR), which catalyzes the conversion of DOPEGAL to DHPG and DOPAL to DOPET. NADPH also supports cellular redox balance that limits oxidative stress from catecholamine turnover.

Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)

Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) is a tightly bound redox co-factor for MAO. FAD accepts electrons during oxidative deamination of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, forming the corresponding aldehydes (e.g., DOPAL) and hydrogen peroxide. Within catecholamine synthesis and metabolism, MAO is the only enzyme that has an obligate, direct requirement for FAD.

III. CATECHOLAMINE NEUROEFFECTOR COUPLING

III.1. Exocytosis

Catecholamine neuroeffector coupling begins with calcium-dependent exocytosis of the contents of vesicles. According to the exocytosis theory, catecholamines are stored at very high concentrations within chromaffin granules and synaptic vesicles and are released when stimulation evokes Ca++ influx, which causes fusion of the granule/vesicle with the plasma membrane and discharge of the contents (56). Electrical measurements in single adrenal chromaffin cells have shown discrete increases in membrane capacitance during secretion, indicating quantized vesicle fusion events consistent with exocytosis (57). Exocytotic sites have been visualized by antibody labeling of granule membrane proteins exposed transiently at the cell surface during secretion, further supporting the exocytosis/endocytosis secretory cycle in chromaffin cells (58). Since 2004, confocal and super-resolution stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy have demonstrated vesicle fusion (Ω-profiles) (59) and dynamic fusion-pore opening/expansion/constriction/closure (60) in chromaffin cells.

III.2. Reuptake

Most released catecholamines are removed from the extracellular fluid by reuptake (6163), which is mediated by cell membrane transporters—the cell membrane dopamine transporter (DAT, SLC6A3) (64, 65) and the cell membrane norepinephrine transporter (NET, SLC6A2) (66). Both are high-affinity Na+/Cl-dependent plasma membrane transporters that terminate signaling and also recycle the neurotransmitter. The DAT shows the highest affinity and transport capacity for dopamine, with much lower affinity for norepinephrine or epinephrine. Dopamine is a better substrate for the NET than is norepinephrine, which in turn is a better substrate than epinephrine (67), explaining the limited sympathoneural uptake of circulating EPI.

Reuptake is not only a mechanism for terminating catecholamine signaling but also a mechanism for conserving transmitter. In both DAT and NET knockout mice, lack of catecholamine reuptake markedly prolongs extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine signaling while producing profound compensatory changes, including reduced tissue catecholamines stores and altered catecholamines release, indicating that synthesis alone cannot fully replace the recycling function of membrane catecholamine transporters during ongoing monoaminergicneurotransmission (6870). Analogously, NET blockade by norepinephrine-selective antidepressants or SNRIs prolongs extracellular norepinephrine signaling. NET knockout mice have decreased cardiac tissue concentrations of norepinephrine and DHPG (71).

NET knockout mouse models differ substantially from pharmacological blockade of the NET. There are profound developmental alterations in the former that are not recapitulated in the latter. All known NET blockers readily penetrate the central nervous system and elicit profound sympathoinhbition (72, 73).

III.3. Neuromodulator vs. neurotransmitter

Dopamine and norepinephrine act as central neurotransmitters with prominent neuromodulatory actions. The “neuromodulator” designation reflects the fact that dopamine receptors are metabotropic G protein-coupled receptors, rather than ionotropic receptors mediating fast synaptic transmission.

Regarding neuromodulator vs. neurotransmitter function, it is not just a matter of metabolotrophic vs. ionotrophic receptors but also how close those receptors are to sites of release, as relevant to fast and slow transmission. Neurotransmitters act within nanometers of sites of release (e.g., synaptic transmission) whereas neuromodulators mostly act from hundreds of nanometers to micrometers from sites of release (volume transmission) (7477). In the central nervous system there may be both synaptic and volume transmission for norepinephrine and dopamine; however, the latter is predominant (78). Presumably levodopa treatment to bypass nigrostriatal dopamine deficiency in Parkinson disease works via general production of dopamine for volume transmission. Similarly, norepinephrine released by sympathetic nerves (at varicosities rather than boutons) functions as both a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator. Since 2004, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and genetically encoded dopamine/norepinephrine sensors have made it possible to relate phasic and tonic catecholamine dynamics to behavior and circuit activity in vivo (7982).

III.4. Neuronal sites of release vs. hormonal sites of action

Catecholamines act through neuronal and hormonal pathways that differ fundamentally in sites of release, diffusion, and target specificity. In the neuronal mode, catecholamines are released from nerve terminals or varicosities. This junctional release governs organ-specific responses such as vascular tone, heart rate, and gastrointestinal motility. In contrast, the hormonal mode especially involves secretion of epinephrine from adrenomedullary chromaffin cells into the systemic circulation, reaching distant organs to produce diffuse, longer-lasting effects such as mobilization of energy stores and the “fight-or-flight” response. The two modes are integrated but distinct: neuronal norepinephrine acts locally within milliseconds to seconds, while circulating epinephrine exerts systemic effects lasting seconds to minutes.

Moreover, catecholamine metabolism differs between compartments—neural norepinephrine is largely cleared by reuptake mediated by the NET, whereas circulating catecholamines are inactivated mainly by extra-neuronal uptake followed by COMT and MAO (8385).

Based on concurrent measurements of plasma norepinephrine levels and blood pressure during sympathetic stimulation or norepinephrine infusion, concentration gradients have been estimated between sites of release and the circulation (86, 87). A 20 mm Hg sympathetically mediated pressor response is associated with about a 560 pg/ml (3.3 nM) concentration of norepinephrine in the average neuroeffector junction. Relationships of estimated rates of norepinephrine release with spillover into the circulation vary depending on the organ. In the kidneys, norepinephrine release is about three times spillover, in skeletal muscle 12 times spillover, and in the heart >20 times spillover. Thus, norepinephrine release greatly but variably exceeds spillover in these organs (88).

III.5. Adrenoceptors and relevance to functions of specific catecholamines

The recognition beginning in the mid-twentieth century of catecholamine receptor types, subtypes, and intracellular second-messenger systems greatly complicated—but also substantially enriched—understanding of how three simple molecules give rise to myriad adaptive responses that have enhanced survival over aeons.

III.5.1. Evolutionary origins of adrenoceptor multiplicity

It is remarkable that the three endogenous catecholamines signal via so many receptor types and subtypes. This multiplicity can be traced to particular events in evolutionary history—two periods, referred to as R1 and R2, when whole-genome duplication (WGD) occurred in back to back eras (89). With WGD the entire chromosome set was copied, briefly creating a tetraploid organism. WGDs quadrupled the genomic ancestor of catecholamine receptors from a single G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), resulting in receptor types and subtypes in alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor and dopamine receptor families.

After the R1 and R2 events four families of receptors emerged—DRD1-like, with dopamine the endogenous ligand and Gs the second messenger; DRD2-like, with dopamine the ligand and Gi/o the second messenger (90); ADRA-like, with norepinephrine or epinephrine the agonist at alpha-adrenoceptors and Gq / Gi/o the second messengers; and ADRB-like, with norepinephrine or epinephrine the agonist at beta-adrenoceptors and Gs the second messenger. Small subsequent duplications and losses led to the current vertebrate repertoire: Dopamine D1, D5 (D1-like) and D2, D3, D4 (D2-like), adrenergic alpha (alpha-1A/B/D and alpha-2A/B/C), and adrenergic beta (beta-1, beta-2, and beta-3) (91, 92).

These evolutionary developments help understand the complexity and tissue specificity of catecholaminergic signaling. Indeed, the same ligands can elicit opposite effects (e.g., augmentation of sympathetically mediated norepinephrine release via beta-adrenoceptors (93) vs. inhibition via alpha-2 adrenoceptors (94)), tissue-specific actions (e.g., beta-3 adrenoceptors in brown fat (95) and bladder detrusor (96); D4 receptors in prefrontal cortex (97)), and fine partitioning of hormonal vs. synaptic vs. extra-synaptic (junctional) signaling (98101).

III.5.2. Adrenoceptors mediating effects of circulating vs. neuronally released catecholamine

Different adrenoceptor populations mediate effects of circulating vs. neuronally released catecholamine. Neuronally released norepinephrine acts primarily on local alpha-1, alpha-2, and beta-1 adrenoceptors. In contrast, circulating catecholamines—predominantly epinephrine—engage a broader array of adrenergic receptors including beta-2 adrenoceptors on myocardial cells (102) and vascular smooth muscle cells in skeletal muscle (103). Neuronal norepinephrine release is modulated by inhibitory alpha-2 autoreceptors (104, 105) as well as by muscarinic heteroreceptors (106) on sympathetic nerves—enabling refined adjustments compared to hormonal epinephrine.

III.5.3. Receptor down-regulation

Chronic elevations of catecholamines produce adrenoceptor down-regulation and desensitization (107), representing an allostatic adjustment. When alpha- or beta-adrenoceptors are exposed to agonist for a prolonged period, receptor signaling is turned off by a multi-step process involving (a) receptor phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs) at specific serine/threonine residues on the receptor’s intracellular domains (108); (b) recruitment of β-arrestin by the GRK-phosphorylated receptor binding to β-arrestin, sterically blocking further coupling of the receptor to G proteins (109); and (c) receptor internalization (endocytosis) and recycling back to the cell membrane (resensitization) or down-regulation by degradation (110). Different GRKs and β-arrestin isoforms can yield distinct functional outcomes (111).

Arrestin recruitment to activated GPCRs is now understood to do more than terminate G-protein signaling. Arrestins also act as adaptor/scaffold proteins that can initiate distinct signaling pathways, including ERK/MAPK and other kinase cascades. Thus, receptor–arrestin engagement should be described as a dual-function process mediating both desensitization/internalization and G-protein-independent or arrestin-biased signaling (112, 113).

III.5.4. Denervation supersensitivity

Whereas desensitization has been dissected in exquisite molecular detail, denervation supersensitivity remains a phenomenon with incompletely understood cellular and molecular contributors (114, 115). Some proposed mechanisms are (a) upregulation, i.e., increased transcription or membrane insertion of postsynaptic adrenoceptors; (b) enhanced receptor-effector coupling via increased G-protein availability or adenylate cyclase responsiveness: (c) Loss of local neurotransmitter uptake via the NET or decreased metabolism by MAO//COMT; and (d) changes in resting membrane potential and ion channel sensitivity.

III.6. Chemical coding

Early models of catecholamine signaling were shaped by Dale’s principle, which emphasized a single chemical transmitter released from each neuron. This view was fundamentally revised by Burnstock’s demonstration of purinergic cotransmission, showing that catecholaminergic neurons—particularly sympathetic nerves—corelease adenosine triphosphate (ATP) with norepinephrine and, in some contexts, neuropeptides, thereby generating temporally and functionally distinct components of target-organ responses (116, 117).

III.6.1. Purinergic transmission

Many catecholaminergic neurons, particularly sympathetic post-ganglionic fibers, co-release ATP along with norepinephrine from their synaptic vesicles, forming a key component of purinergic neurotransmission (118). ATP acts as a co-transmitter, mediating fast excitatory junctional potentials and producing rapid contractions of vascular and visceral smooth muscle before the slower, more sustained alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated responses elicited by norepinephrine.

Upon release into the synaptic cleft, ATP activates P2X ligand-gated ion channels on post-synaptic membranes, resulting in depolarization and calcium influx, while P2Y G-protein–coupled receptors contribute to longer-lasting modulatory effects. Since 2004, the co-transmission model proposed by Burnstock and colleagues has established that sympathetic neurotransmission is triphasic, involving a rapid ATP-mediated response, an intermediate norepinephrine-mediated response, and sometimes a slower neuropeptide Y (NPY) component (119).

III.6.2. Chromogranins

Chromogranins are a family of acidic glycoproteins that are major constituents of the soluble matrix of catecholamine storage vesicles in chromaffin cells and sympathetic neurons. Among these, chromogranin A (CgA) is the most abundant and extensively studied (120). CgA binds catecholamines and ATP in the vesicular lumen. Upon exocytotic release, CgA undergoes proteolytic processing to yield several biologically active peptides, including catestatin, which inhibits nicotinic receptor–mediated catecholamine secretion and thereby provides autocrine negative feedback on sympathetically-mediated exocytosis (121).

III.6.3. Endogenous opioids

Endogenous opioids, including enkephalins, endorphins, and dynorphins, are neuropeptides derived from larger precursor proteins—proenkephalin (PENK), proopiomelanocortin (POMC), and prodynorphin (PDYN)—that exert their effects through μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors, all of which are G-protein–coupled receptors. Among these, the enkephalins (Met- and Leu-enkephalin) are particularly relevant to catecholaminergic function. They are colocalized with catecholamines in adrenal chromaffin cells, sympathetic ganglia, and certain central noradrenergic neurons, especially those in the nucleus of the solitary tract, locus ceruleus, and hypothalamus (122, 123).

III.6.4. Neuropeptide Y

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36–amino acid peptide that serves as a major sympathetic cotransmitter and neuromodulator throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems (124). NPY is co-stored and co-released with norepinephrine from large dense-core vesicles of sympathetic postganglionic neurons and adrenal chromaffin cells and is one of the most abundant neuropeptides in the mammalian brain and autonomic nervous system. Since 2004 it has been recognized that upon severe stress-related sympathetic activation, NPY is released in parallel with norepinephrine but produces longer-lasting effects through its action on Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptors, G-protein–coupled receptors expressed on vascular smooth muscle, sympathetic nerve terminals, and central autonomic neurons (125, 126).

III.7. Cotransmission by location

Sympathetic noradrenergic nerves contain multiple cotransmitters including ATP, NPY, and sometimes enkephalins or galanin stored together with norepinephrine in synaptic vesicles. Upon nerve stimulation, these are coreleased in a frequency- and pattern-dependent manner, producing temporally distinct phases of target-organ response (118).

In adrenomedullary chromaffin cells, catecholamines are stored in large dense-core vesicles with chromogranins, ATP, calcium, and opioid peptides such as enkephalins. Co-released chromogranin-derived peptides like catestatin and vasostatin provide autocrine negative feedback on secretion and cardiovascular tone, while enkephalins inhibit further catecholamine release via opioid receptors (121, 122, 127).

Within central catecholaminergic neurons, including those in the locus ceruleus, hypothalamus, and nucleus of the solitary tract, dopamine or norepinephrine may be coreleased with neuropeptides such as galanin, dynorphin, or somatostatin, as well as with ATP or glutamate.

Collectively, the organization of cotransmission by anatomical locus—peripheral, adrenal, or central—enables catecholaminergic systems to incorporate fast synaptic excitation, intermediate neuromodulation, and slow neuropeptide-mediated plasticity, ensuring flexible and context-dependent regulation of autonomic and behavioral states.

IV. THREE PERIPHERAL CATECHOLAMINERGIC SYSTEMS

The physiological roles of catecholamines in the periphery can be conceptualized as organized into distinct systems that differ in cellular origin, modes of release, patterns of regulation, and functional scope. This section describes three types of peripheral catecholaminergic systems—autocrine/paracrine, hormonal, and neurotransmitter—and examines how their specialized architectures enable coordinated yet differential contributions to homeostasis, stress responses, and allostatic adaptation. We also present here the relatively new concept of the “extended autonomic system” (EAS), which incorporates neuroendocrine, immune/inflammatory, and central components and reflects developments over the past century since Langley’s original formulation of the autonomic nervous system (2). Central catecholaminergic systems are considered here primarily within the context of the EAS.

IV.1. Autocrine-paracrine catecholaminergic systems

Most of the production and metabolism of norepinephrine and dopamine in humans takes place not in the brain or in the autonomic nervous system but in mesenteric organs (41, 128). Non-neuronal cell bodies in mesenteric organs express immunoreactive TH and have detectable TH activity, implying an ability to generate DOPA locally (129). During the course of evolution, autocrine-paracrine catecholaminergic systems probably were superseded by neurotransmitter and hormonal systems (130), but they are still present. Based on human arteriovenous balance and portal sampling, the gastrointestinal tract is the predominant source of circulating and urinary dopamine metabolites (45, 46).

IV.1.1. The renal DOPA/dopamine autocrine-paracrine system and sodium balance

The renal DOPA/DA system can be considered to be the prototype for autocrine-paracrine catecholaminergic systems in the human body (Figure 3). Comparative physiological data suggest that the DOPA/DA system evolved first but was superseded by endocrine and neuroendocrine systems such as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, pituitary-adrenocortical, and sympathetic adrenergic systems and by nerve networks culminating in the sympathetic nervous system (130).

In rats (131) and humans (132) most or all of the dopamine excreted in the urine reflects uptake and enzymatic decarboxylation of circulating DOPA. The released dopamine acts on dopaminergic receptors on the same or nearby cells to enhance sodium excretion. Dietary salt loading increases urinary excretion of both DOPA and dopamine (133), and carbidopa, which inhibits LAAAD, decreases urinary sodium excretion (134). Patients with salt-sensitive hypertension have decreased dopamine for a given amount of DOPA excretion (135), consistent with decreased proximal tubular uptake or decreased enzymatic decarboxylation of DOPA.

IV.1.2. Autocrine-paracrine catecholamines and the gut

Over the past several years, numerous studies have begun to address the roles of the gut microbiome and relationships with catecholamines in normal physiology and pathophysiological states (136). Despite the fact that splanchnic organs constitute the main site of production and metabolism of endogenous catecholamines in the body (41, 128), studies to date have not systematically incorporated the autocrine-paracrine actions of locally produced catecholamines on gastrointestinal functions or on the gut microbiome.

Catecholamine metabolism has an important peripheral dimension in the gastrointestinal tract. Substantial dopamine production occurs in human mesenteric organs, and gut luminal catecholamine availability is influenced by the microbiota, supporting autocrine and paracrine actions of catecholamines within the intestine (128, 137). Dopamine can act locally in the gut; for example, luminal dopamine stimulates duodenal bicarbonate secretion through apical D2 receptors (138). From this initial conceptual understanding of over 20 years ago, there has been expansion to biological and clinical relevance. Thus more recent experimental work also indicates that gut–brain vagal signaling can regulate mesolimbic dopamine dynamics and reward-related behavior, linking intestinal signals to central dopaminergic function within the gut–brain axis (139). These findings suggest that intestinal catecholamine metabolism should be considered not only as a peripheral biochemical process but also as a component of microbiota–gut–brain communication. This is a rapidly expanding field of research (139141).

IV.1.3. Catecholamines and cytokines

Endogenous catecholamines and cytokines interact bi-directionally (142): hormonal epinephrine—the main endogenous agonist at beta-2 adrenoceptors—generally inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokine production, whereas inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α activate central and peripheral catecholaminergic systems, linking immune and stress responses.

IV.1.4. Catecholamines, the pancreas, and glucose homeostasis

The main hormones regulating glucose levels are insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine. Epinephrine decreases insulin levels (143), and plasma insulin and glucagon levels during stress states reflect the opposing interaction between hyperglycemia and catecholamines (144).

Epinephrine’s roles in hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis and in skeletal-muscle glycogenolysis with enhanced glycolytic flux are well established and form a core component of acute glucose homeostasis during stress. In contrast, although dopamine is synthesized locally in multiple peripheral tissues (e.g., gastrointestinal tract, kidney, pancreas), its integrated physiological roles in glucose regulation and intermediary metabolism remain incompletely defined.

IV.2. Catecholamines and neuroendocrine systems

IV.2.1. The Sympathetic Adrenergic System (SAS) and responses to global threats

Walter B. Cannon and a colleague reported in 1911 that emotional distress evokes release of a substance from the adrenal gland into the circulation (145). One may reasonably infer that epinephrine was the first hormone to be described (146). The sympathetic adrenergic system (SAS), in which epinephrine is the main chemical effector, may also be considered to be the first neuroendocrine system (2).

As discussed in more detail below, SAS activation is a highly sensitive indicator of experienced distress (147) and any global threat to homeostasis, even mild acute glucoprivation (148). In contrast, the sympathetic noradrenergic system (SNS) plays major roles in circulatory adjustments during activities of daily living such as orthostasis, mild exercise, the post-prandial state, and altered environmental temperature (149).

IV.2.2. Related neuroendocrine systems

The SNS and SAS interact importantly with a variety of neuroendocrine systems.

HPA axis-catecholamine interactions

In general, stressors that evoke increases in activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis also increase SAS outflow as indicated by plasma epinephrine levels (150). Systemic administration of the beta-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol tends to inhibit the HPA axis while increasing plasma norepinephrine levels (151).

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)-catecholamine interactions

Catecholamines and the RAAS amplify each other. Renal sympathetic activation stimulates beta-adrenoceptors on juxtaglomerular cells, which increases renin release and initiates the angiotensin-to-aldosterone cascade. Classic in vitro work demonstrated a direct beta-adrenergic drive on renin secretion (152). Angiotensin II (AII), in turn, can facilitate sympathetic neurotransmission via stimulatory effects in the brain (153) and possibly by pre-junctional actions that enhance norepinephrine release, although there is insufficient evidence for functional AII receptors on sympathetic nerves (154). Surgical stress results in parallel activation of the SNS and RAAS (155).

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and adrenomedullary functions

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) was first identified in hypothalamus, based on its ability to elevate cyclic AMP in the anterior pituitary. PACAP subsequently was found to be an adrenomedullary neurotransmitter (156). PACAP evokes catecholamine secretion and activation of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes during stress in mammals (157). Low-frequency splanchnic neural activity evokes adrenomedullary catecholamine secretion mainly through cholinergic mechanisms via nicotinic receptors, whereas high-frequency firing as during stress recruits PACAP-dependent peptidergic signaling that supports both catecholamine secretion and induction or activation of catecholamine-biosynthetic enzymes, thereby coupling release from chromaffin granules to replenishment of catecholamine stores (156, 158162).

IV.3. Catecholamines and immune/inflammatory systems

IV.3.1. The vagal anti-inflammatory system

The vagal anti-inflammatory system provides an example of bi-directional neuroimmune regulation in which afferent inflammatory signals engage central autonomic circuits that, in turn, modulate peripheral cytokine production through autonomic efferent pathways. The system conceptualized by Tracey (163) entails a catecholaminergic component, in that the efferent pathway includes the splenic nerve (164), and there is no convincing evidence for direct vagal innervation of the spleen. Nicotinic receptors containing the α7 subunit are required for the reflex (165). The reflex as currently understood seems to involve a paradox, because afferent vagal stimulation inhibits activity of brainstem centers mediating sympathetic outflows (166), yet beta-2 adrenoceptor stimulation exerts an inhibitory effect on release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (167). It seems likely that the resolution will come from better understanding of complex interplays within the extended autonomic network.

IV.3.2. Catecholamine-driven “stress leukogram”

Acute elevations of circulating catecholamines can rapidly alter leukocyte trafficking and circulating counts (demargination/redistribution), producing a “stress leukogram” pattern with an increased neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio depending on timing and compartment shifts. Human infusion studies have shown that catecholamine administration increases circulating neutrophils (and alters lymphocyte counts) in vivo (168) and that epinephrine can increase total leukocyte counts with measurable shifts in neutrophil and lymphocyte populations (169). The general view that catecholamine excess is pro-inflammatory is supported by the findings that patients harboring a pheochromocytoma have elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios that are correlated with plasma metanephrine levels and are mitigated by adrenalectomy (170).

In humans, perioperative infusion of the alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine evokes a pattern of biochemical and immune/inflammatory effects. Dexmedetomidine decreases norepinephrine, epinephrine, cortisol, and blood glucose levels. Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, C-reactive protein levels, and CD8(+) T cells decrease, while interleukin-10, numbers of natural killer cells, B cells, CD4(+) T cells, and ratios of CD4(+):CD8(+) and Th1:Th2 increase (171). These results may be interpreted in terms of sympatholysis attenuating perioperative central stress system activation and associated cytotoxic immune tone with relative restoration or expansion of helper/regulatory adaptive immunity (172, 173).

Immune cells can express catecholamine-synthetic enzymes and generate catecholamines upon activation, providing potentially rich interfaces between catecholaminergic signaling and inflammation (174). The recently proposed theory of the extended autonomic system offers a unifying concept integrating the roles of neurotransmitter, neuroendocrine, and autocrine-paracrine catecholaminergic systems in immune/inflammatory functions (2, 3).

IV.4. Central catecholaminergic systems

Dopamine and norepinephrine act as central neurotransmitters with prominent neuromodulatory actions. The “neuromodulator” designation reflects the fact that dopamine receptors are metabotropic G protein-coupled receptors, rather than ionotropic receptors mediating fast synaptic transmission.

The dopaminergic nigrostriatal system originates in the substantia nigra pars compacta and projects to the striatum, where it modulates motor initiation, coordination, and habit learning. Nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration produces the cardinal motor features of Parkinson’s disease. The meso-limbo-cortical system, arising from the ventral tegmental area and projecting to limbic and cortical regions, mediates reward processing, motivation, affect, and cognitive flexibility, and its dysregulation contributes to addiction, depression, and schizophrenia.

The brain’s largest dopaminergic projection system is the nigrostriatal pathway, arising mainly from substantia nigra pars compacta neurons and innervating the dorsal striatum, whereas the adjacent ventral tegmental area gives rise largely to mesolimbic and mesocortical projections to limbic and cortical targets (175177).

There is massive literature on the nigrostriatal and meso-limbo-cortical dopaminergic systems and the locus ceruleus noradrenergic system. Animal models of acute and chronic stress have noted increases in both dopamine and norepinephrine in the medial prefrontal cortex(178, 179); however, relatively little attention has been paid to dopamine-norepinephrine interactions (180).

Since 2004 it has been recognized that TH-positivity alone does not imply a fully catecholaminergic phenotype. In hypothalamic and developmental contexts, neurons may express only TH and produce L-DOPA, whereas neighboring LAAAD-expressing neurons may convert taken-up L-DOPA to dopamine (181). Weihe and colleagues have distinguished “dopaergic” from classical dopaminergic neurons (182). Therefore, identifying neurons as catecholaminergic generally requires evidence beyond TH immunoreactivity, such as LAAAD and VMAT2 co-expression or direct evidence of catecholamine synthesis, storage, and release.

IV.4.1. Roles of central neural dopamine

Dopamine is a central neurotransmitter that plays key roles in movement, motivation, reward learning, cognition, and neuroendocrine regulation. In the nigrostriatal system, dopamine shapes action selection via basal-ganglia loops (183). In mesolimbic circuits, dopamine neurons encode reward-prediction errors and incentive salience (184, 185). In prefrontal cortex, dopamine modulates working memory and executive control (186). In the tuberoinfundibular pathway, hypothalamic dopamine tonically inhibits prolactin (187). Thus, in the past two decades there has been increasing recognition that dopamine functions in the brain not only as a simple “pleasure chemical” or regulator of locomotion but as a multi-faceted neurotransmitter with prominent neuromodulatory actions, orchestrating motor, motivational, cognitive, emotional, and endocrine domains of central nervous system function.

IV.4.2. Roles of central neural norepinephrine

Most of the norepinephrine in the brain originates from the pontine locus ceruleus (LC). The LC influences virtually all major forebrain and brainstem structures (188). The LC–noradrenergic system plays pivotal roles in arousal, attention, stress responsiveness, and behavioral flexibility, adjusting neuronal excitability and network synchrony in response to salient or novel stimuli (189). Local GABAergic neurons within the LC dynamically fine control norepinephrine release during behavioral state transitions (190).

Epinephrine is scarce in the brain, although C1 neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) express phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PNMT) (191). Normally there is no epinephrine detected in cerebrospinal fluid.

IV.4.3. Sources of sympathetic outflows

Descending pathways to sympathetic preganglionic neurons arise from multiple brain areas (RVLM, PVN, A5, rostral ventromedial medulla, caudal raphe nuclei) but not the locus ceruleus (A6) (192194).

Compared to studies considering central dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems in isolation, studies integrating the two neuromodulators are relatively scarce (195). Dopamine can be co-released with norepinephrine from central noradrenergic terminals (196), contributing to memory consolidation (197, 198).

IV.4.4. Relationships between central and peripheral catecholaminergic systems

Circulating catecholamines have extremely limited access to most brain parenchyma, demonstrating an effective blood-brain barrier after systemic administration (199, 200). In contrast, L-DOPA crosses the blood–brain barrier via large neutral amino-acid transport systems, providing the mechanistic basis for pharmacologic augmentation of central catecholamine synthesis (201).

The blood-brain barrier for catecholamines is imperfect in the hypothalamus—particularly neuroendocrine regions such as the median eminence—and circumventricular structures such as the area postrema, where fenestrated capillaries and specialized barriers permit exposure to circulating hormones, metabolites, and cytokines. These regions function as sensory and integrative interfaces rather than conduits for bulk equilibration of catecholamines between blood and brain (202). In the opposite direction, kinetic studies using cerebral venous sampling and isotope dilution have noted measurable norepinephrine overflow from the brain into venous plasma; however, this contribution is small relative to whole-body norepinephrine spillover (203, 204). Instead, central catecholaminergic systems mainly influence peripheral catecholamine dynamics indirectly, via descending neural and neuroendocrine pathways regulating sympathetic preganglionic neurons, adrenomedullary secretion, and reflexive autonomic responses. Thus, cerebrospinal fluid and circulating norepinephrine levels are correlated despite the blood-brain and brain-blood barriers for norepinephrine (205, 206). Cerebral venous overflows of dopamine metabolites occur without parallel increases in circulating dopamine (207), and renal proximal tubular dopamine production depends on local precursor handling and decarboxylation rather than central catecholamine synthesis (208, 209).

IV.5. Differential regulation of endogenous catecholaminergic systems

Although the use of terms such as “autonomic failure” and “dysautonomia” suggest single entities, it has become clear in the past two decades that the autonomic nervous system has functionally and neurochemically distinct components (210). Evidence has accumulated for differential noradrenergic vs. adrenergic responses in various situations. The largest SAS responses are seen when the organism encounters stressors that pose a global or metabolic threat, such as glucoprivation, hypotensive hemorrhage, and emotional distress, whereas SNS activation dominates the responses to orthostasis, moderate exercise, and exposure to cold (150). There seems to be at least as good a justification for the concept of coordinated HPA-SAS responses as for coordinated SNS-SAS responses in stress (211). Heterogeneous patterns of SNS and neuroendocrine responses belie the notion of a non-specific response of the body to any demand imposed on it (212, 213). The section on catecholamine metabolic patterns in pathophysiological states elaborates on this theme.

IV.6. Interpreting plasma catecholamine levels: Effects of skin color, age, and sex

In melanocytes, tyrosine is converted to DOPA and then DOPA-quinone via tyrosinase (214). During early development in mice tyrosinase can be a source of dopamine independently of TH (215). Based on comparisons of albino subjects and Black vs Caucasian participants, in humans plasma DOPA is not related to skin pigmentation; however, urinary excretion of DOPA and dopamine are greater in Black Americans than in Caucasian Americans (216). There are no consistent differences in plasma levels or urinary excretion of norepinephrine as a function of skin color under resting conditions.

Plasma L-DOPA tends to decrease with age, whereas plasma norepinephrine increases (217). Higher plasma norepinephrine with aging at least partly reflects reduced norepinephrine clearance (218). Rather than reflecting a uniform increase in sympathetic outflow, aging is associated with heterogeneous changes across different vascular beds (219, 220). After accounting for age-related reductions in clearance, total body epinephrine spillover does not increase with aging (221, 222).

With respect to sex, the literature about plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine has been inconsistent. An early study noted higher plasma norepinephrine in females and epinephrine in males (223). In another study, plasma norepinephrine did not differ by sex or skin color; plasma epinephrine was lower in white females than in other groups (224). In a third study, muscle sympathetic nerve activity was found to increase progressively from young women and young men to older women and older men, but plasma norepinephrine did not differ across these groups (225). Plasma norepinephrine is higher in the luteal phase of the ovulatory cycle, underscoring sex/hormonal influences on “baseline” reference values (226).

In a large reference cohort, men had higher plasma free metanephrine but not normetanephrine than women, and normetanephrine increased with subject age (227).

IV.7. The “extended” autonomic system

The “extended autonomic system” (EAS), a concept introduced within the past two decades (2, 3), encompasses the traditional sympathetic, parasympathetic, and enteric divisions postulated by Langley (228) but also incorporates neuroendocrine and immune/inflammatory systems and the central autonomic network (4). Taken together, these components regulate allostasis and coordinate adaptive responses to a variety of stressors (2, 3).

Catecholaminergic systems exemplify brain–body cross-talk. Catecholamines in the brain modulate autonomic outflows, catecholamines in the periphery act as the chemical messengers of those outflows, and catecholaminergic mechanisms such as norepinephrine release in the spinal dorsal horn modulate afferent input—together forming bi-directional “two-way streets” (229) that integrate central and peripheral regulation of homeostasis and allostasis (6, 7, 230).

V. CATECHOLAMINE EFFECTS IN PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STATES

Since catecholaminergic systems contribute to virtually every organ function, behavior, and emotional state, it is expected that in many situations alterations in those systems exert syndromic pathophysiological effects. Examples discussed below are dysregulations due to genomic lesions; stress cardiomyopathy as in takotsubo syndrome; acute and chronic heart failure; autonomic failure syndromes related to cardiac noradrenergic deficiency; pathophysiological consequences of altered functions of the renal DOPA-dopamine autocrine-paracrine system; the catecholamine-driven stress leukogram; and fainting reactions.

V.1. Genetic abnormalities

Genomic variants affecting catecholamine biosynthesis, storage, recycling, or metabolism provide insights about functional consequences of specific lesions within catecholaminergic systems as indicated by particular catecholamine metabolomic patterns.

Multiple genetic abnormalities lead to decreased activity of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH) and thereby norepinephrine synthesis, even without a variant of the DBH gene itself, by disrupting essential co-factors or intracellular conditions. A shared and prominent clinical consequence in these conditions is neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH), reflecting an impaired ability of postganglionic sympathetic neurons to increase norepinephrine release in response to reduced venous return on standing. Menkes disease (ATP7A deficiency) is a prototypical example. DBH is a copper-dependent enzyme, and ATP7A is required for copper delivery to the secretory pathway. In Menkes disease, defective copper trafficking leads to functional DBH deficiency, with elevated dopamine and reduced norepinephrine and DHPG, resulting in a high DA:NE ratio and impaired sympathetic vasoconstriction (231, 232).

A second example, described relatively recently, involves defects in intra-vesicular ascorbate regeneration, notably cytochrome b561 (CYB561) deficiency (55, 233). Ascorbate is required to maintain DBH copper in its reduced, catalytically active state. Biallelic CYB561 mutations cause selective sympathetic noradrenergic failure, characterized by lifelong, severe nOH and catecholamine profiles consistent with impaired DBH activity despite an intact DBH gene (55, 233).

Genetic deficiency of L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase (LAAAD), coded for by the DDC gene, is associated with decreased production of all three catecholamines as well as of serotonin (234, 235). There is no known disease that manifests with isolated dopamine deficiency. LAAAD deficiency manifests as a drastic, progressive, lethal pediatric disease that presents in infancy with severe hypotonia and hypokinesia, oculogyric crises, dystonia, and global developmental delay, accompanied by prominent autonomic dysfunction including orthostatic hypotension, episodic hypotension or hypothermia, ptosis, nasal congestion, and gastrointestinal dysmotility, reflecting combined central and peripheral monoamine deficiency.

A translationally important example is inherited LAAAD deficiency, which impairs synthesis of catecholamines and serotonin. This disorder has become a target for AAV2-mediated gene therapy. Intraputaminal delivery of eladocagene exuparvovec, an AAV2 vector carrying the human DDC gene, is intended to restore LAAAD expression and striatal dopamine production. Recent clinical studies have reported sustained improvements in motor function after treatment, illustrating both the central role of LAAAD in monoamine biosynthesis and the therapeutic potential of restoring catecholamine synthesis in a defined neuronal target region (236, 237).

Although phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PNMT) is required for conversion of norepinephrine to epinephrine, and in humans there is a single PNMT gene, no Mendelian disorder has been reported with a characteristic clinical syndrome due to PNMT loss. Evidence for the physiological importance of PNMT comes mainly from PNMT-knockout mouse models, which show stress- and metabolic abnormalities without altered cardiovascular regulation (238). On the other hand, cortisol is trophic for PNMT gene expression. This means that congenital adrenal hyperplasia (the most frequent cause being variation of the CYP21A2 gene) is associated with biochemical evidence of decreased epinephrine production (239). Among the downstream effects is attenuated glucose elevation during high-intensity exercise (240).

The genes encoding the monoamine oxidase (MAO) types MAO-A and MAO-B are located close to each other on the X-chromosome. A family of disorders with different clinical manifestations reflect variants of these genes. The most well established is loss of function mutations of MAO-A (Brunner syndrome (241)), characterized by behavioral abnormalities such as aggressiveness and impulsivity. The extent to which these clinical manifestations reflect altered functions of catecholaminergic systems is incompletely understood, since the main fate of intra-neuronal catecholamines is vesicular uptake, and MAO deficiency builds up other monoamines such as serotonin. An exception is catecholamine-mediated hypertension upon administration of tyramine in the setting of MAO-A deficiency (evoking the “cheese effect”) (13). In combined MAO-A/MAO-B deficiency and Norrie disease (a syndrome resulting from pathogenic variants in the NDP gene (Norrin), located near the MAO genes) there is severe mental retardation, whereas genetic MAO-B deficiency does not entail behavioral abnormalities or mental retardation (13).

V.2. Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma

In the past two decades it has been recognized that sustained systemic catecholamine overproduction in pheochromocytoma is associated with a hypermetabolic, catabolic phenotype. Patients exhibit weight loss or reduced adiposity compared with appropriate comparators, consistent with a net increase in energy expenditure and lipolysis (242, 243). After curative tumor resection, the catecholamine-excess state resolves, and body weight and basal metabolic rate increase during follow-up, consistent with reversal of the pre-operative hypermetabolic drive (244). The post-operative gain is often interpreted as “unmasking” baseline energy balance once circulating catecholamine levels normalize.

Catecholamine excess in pheochromocytoma is associated with a high prevalence of diabetes/glucose intolerance and insulin resistance, consistent with catecholamine-driven impairment of glucose homeostasis (245). Following tumor resection, the diabetes frequently improves or resolves in a substantial proportion of patients, supporting a causal role of catecholamine excess in the dysglycemic state (246).

Pheochromocytoma can manifest with a dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure due to high circulating levels of catecholamines. Histopathologic analysis in end-stage cardiomyopathy related to pheochromocytoma shows focal myocarditis and contraction band necrosis. After removal of the tumor and reversal of the hypercatecholaminergic state the heart failure resolves (247), indicating that the circulating catecholamine excess is the cause of the cardiomyopathy.

Although most tumors of neural crest origin are sporadic, a scientifically and clinically important minority of pheochromocytomas develop as part of inherited syndromes. Two of the most well studied are multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and von Hippel-Lindau disease (248). The two forms display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes (249). MEN 2 patients have more symptoms and a higher incidence of paroxysmal hypertension, which are associated with more prominent increased epinephrine content in the tumor and a high rate of epinephrine synthesis as indicated by plasma metanephrine. Thus, variants of genes controlling catecholamine synthesis link differences in clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma to differential involvement of catecholamines in the tumor.

V.3. Stress cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo syndrome provides a particularly clear clinicopathophysiologic example in which acute stress–linked catecholamine elevations are associated with transient left ventricular dysfunction (“myocardial stunning”) and characteristic wall-motion patterns despite unobstructed coronary arteries. In a foundational clinical study published within the past two decades, patients with stress-related myocardial dysfunction had markedly elevated circulating levels of catecholamines (especially of epinephrine) compared to patients with acute myocardial infarction, supporting catecholamine excess as the proximate driver of the takotsubo phenotype (250).

V.4. Chronic heart failure

In chronic heart failure, persistent sympathetic activation is a core neurohumoral feature: elevated plasma norepinephrine reflects sustained sympathoneural outflow and spillover. Higher circulating norepinephrine is associated with worse clinical status and prognosis, consistent with a contributory role of chronic catecholamine excess in disease progression (251, 252).

V.5. Autonomic failure with postganglionic noradrenergic deficiency

Autonomic failure illustrates the opposite directionality: reduced post-ganglionic sympathetic noradrenergic function yields inadequate norepinephrine mobilization with upright posture and defective reflex vasoconstriction, contributing to neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Classic physiological studies document blunted plasma norepinephrine responses in autonomic failure during orthostatic challenge, supporting the mechanistic link between noradrenergic failure and orthostatic intolerance (253).

V.6. Renal intrarenal DOPA-dopamine system and hypertension

When sufficiently sensitive methods were introduced for assaying endogenous catecholamines, an early application was to examine whether elevated norepinephrine or epinephrine levels would indicate increased sympathetic nervous or adrenomedullary activity in essential hypertension (254, 255). Augmented depressor responses to clonidine (94) and pressor responses to yohimbine (256) in patients with high norepinephrine levels identified patients in whom hypertension was pathophysiologically linked to increased sympathetic outflow. Based on hypertensive-normotensive differences in plasma norepinephrine being most apparent in relatively young groups (257), the concept has emerged in the past two decades that increased sympathetic noradrenergic activity contributes to the pathogenesis of essential hypertension (258).

The renal DOPA-dopamine autocrine-paracrine system contributes to sodium balance, extracellular fluid volume, and blood pressure. This system participates in the natriuretic response to volume expansion (259). Dopamine generated locally from L-DOPA in proximal tubule tissue can inhibit sodium-transport machinery, including Na+/K+-ATPase activity under high-transport conditions (260). In humans, pharmacologic inhibition of dopamine formation with carbidopa reduces urinary dopamine excretion and is associated with altered sodium excretion, consistent with renal dopamine acting as an intrarenal natriuretic factor (134). Blocking dopamine generation can abolish renal functional responses to renal dopamine prodrugs, further supporting functional intra-renal dopamine axis (261). In patients with heart failure, levodopa administration evokes a natriuretic response (262, 263).

Evidence in salt-sensitive states supports a “relative renal dopamine deficiency” concept: with salt loading, some patients exhibit an abnormal pattern of urinary DOPA/dopamine handling consistent with impaired intra-renal dopamine generation and an attenuated natriuretic response, a physiology aligned with salt-sensitive hypertension (135, 264).

V.7. Fainting (vasovagal or neurally mediated syncope)

Vasovagal syncope provides an example of differential alterations in SNS and SAS outflows. Sympathoadrenal imbalance, with disproportionate adrenomedullary activation relative to sympathetic noradrenergic responses, can precede hypotension, bradycardia, presyncope, and syncope both during tilt and in spontaneous episodes (265). This imbalance correlates with concurrent peripheral epinephrine-induced, beta-2-adrenoceptor mediated vasodilation and supports a mechanistic role for catecholamine patterning in syncope pathophysiology (265269).

VI. CATECHOLAMINE METABOLOMIC PATTERNS AS BIOMARKERS OF INTRACELLULAR PROCESSES

Because of the localization of enzymes and transporters in catecholamine-producing cells in different body organs, analysis of metabolomic patterns can provide information about intracellular processes. Figure 7 and Tables 2 and 3 provide overviews that facilitate understanding of some of the catecholamine metabolomic biomarkers and intra-neuronal and extra-neuronal processes. Filled entries indicate relationships supported by empirical data or by kinetic modeling as specified; blank entries indicate that no direct empirical evidence is available or that the relationship has not been evaluated. Model-derived inferences should be interpreted as conditional on the assumptions of the underlying kinetic framework.

Figure 7: Overview of sources of plasma levels of catecholamines and metabolites.

Figure 7:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: ADH=alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; DA=dopamine; DA-Q=dopamine-quinone; DA-S=dopamine sulfate; DBH=dopamine-beta-hydroxylase; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DHPG-S=DHPG-sulfate; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; EPI=epinephrine; EPI-S=epinephrine sulfate; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; MHPG-S=MHPG-sulfate; MN=metanephrine; MN-S=metanephrine sulfate; NE=norepinephrine; NE-S=norepinephrine sulfate; NMN=normetanephrine; NMN-S=normetanephrine sulfate; SULT1A3=phenolsulfotransferase 1A3; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid.

Table 3:

Effects of catecholamines in pathophysiological states

Primary catecholaminergic change Direction / locus Dominant physiological mechanism Resulting physiological or pathophysiological phenotype References
Pheochromocytoma / paraganglioma (chronic catecholamine excess) ↑ NE/EPI, systemic Sustained catecholamine-driven thermogenesis and lipolysis Low BMI and reduced adiposity relative to matched hypertensive controls (242); (243)
Post-adrenalectomy withdrawal of catecholamine excess (pheochromocytoma) ↓ NE/EPI toward normal Loss of catecholamine-mediated energy expenditure Postoperative weight gain and increased adiposity (244)
Pheochromocytoma-associated glucose intolerance ↑ NE/EPI, systemic Catecholamine-induced hepatic glucose output and insulin resistance Apparent type 2 diabetes resolving after tumor resection (245); (246)
Acute stress cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo syndrome) Abrupt ↑ circulating catecholamines Direct catecholamine-mediated myocardial stunning Transient LV systolic dysfunction with apical ballooning (250)
Chronic heart failure with sympathetic overactivity ↑ cardiac NE spillover Catecholamine toxicity to cardiomyocytes Progressive LV systolic dysfunction and adverse remodeling (251); (252)
Autonomic failure (postganglionic noradrenergic loss) ↓ NE synthesis and release Failure of reflex vasoconstriction during orthostasis Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (465)
Renal intrarenal DOPA→dopamine autocrine/paracrine system (physiology) ↑ intrarenal DA synthesis from filtered L-DOPA Local inhibition of proximal tubular Na+ transport Salt-induced natriuresis (260); (133); (261)
Renal intrarenal dopamine deficiency ↓ intrarenal DA synthesis Loss of intrarenal natriuretic brake Salt-sensitive hypertension (264)
Catecholamine-driven stress leukogram / NLR shift ↑ NE/EPI, systemic Neutrophil demargination and lymphocyte redistribution Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (167); (168)
Vasovagal (neurally mediated) syncope Epinephrine surge with sympathetic noradrenergic withdrawal Sympathoadrenal imbalance causing vasodilation and hypotension Fainting with cerebral hypoperfusion (265)

VI.1. Biosynthesis

Catecholamine metabolomic patterns provide sensitive biochemical indicators of TH and LAAAD activity. Altered activity of either enzyme produces distinct, measurable shifts in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, or tissue catecholamine and metabolite levels. Reduced TH activity, whether genetic, pharmacologic, or due to co-factor (BH4 or Fe++) deficiency, leads to accumulation of tyrosine, with low levels of DOPA, dopamine, and downstream metabolites (DOPAC, HVA, NE, and MHPG), as seen in autosomal recessive TH deficiency and dopa-responsive dystonia (271, 272).

Conversely, increased TH activity, as in acute distress-associated sympathoadrenal activation, raises DOPA and DOPAC relative to dopamine and norepinephrine, reflecting enhanced cytosolic turnover and oxidative metabolism (1). LAAAD inhibition—pharmacologic (e.g., carbidopa) or genetic—causes accumulation of L-DOPA and depletion of dopamine, DOPAC, and HVA (234). Thus, the ratios DOPA/tyrosine, DA/DOPA, and DOPAC/DA provide metabolomic fingerprints of TH and LAAAD function, offering quantitative insight into catecholamine synthetic flux and neuronal integrity in both experimental and clinical contexts.

VI.2. Catecholamine turnover

Catecholamine turnover represents the continuous loss and replenishment by synthesis. Although catecholamine turnover has often been considered to be driven by catecholamine release with escape of neuronal reuptake, the main determinant of norepinephrine turnover is leakage from vesicular stores, originally proposed by Kopin in 1964 (273). In the human heart about 12% of norepinephrine turnover under resting conditions is from extra-neuronal uptake and metabolism or loss of the transmitter to the circulation, 15% from intra-neuronal metabolism after reuptake, and 73% from intra-neuronal metabolism of norepinephrine leaking from storage vesicles (274).

The large contribution of leakage to catecholamine turnover may seem inconsistent with cellular economy. In fact, this contribution provides an important mechanism for “gearing down” the requirement for increases in catecholamine synthesis to match increases in catecholamine release and thereby provides sympathetic nerves with a capacity for a more extended range of sustainable release rates in response to sustained stress than would otherwise be possible (275).

VI.3. Vesicular storage and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH)

Vesicular uptake is an energy requiring process that depends on a proton pump. Vesicular monoamine transporters (VMAT1 and VMAT2) transport cytoplasmic monoamines into the vesicles. Vesicular contents leak passively back into the cytoplasm.

Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH), which catalyzes the conversion of dopamine to norepinephrine, is localized to the vesicles. The enzyme contains, and its activity requires, copper. Decreased vesicular uptake or decreased DBH activity therefore decreases levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine and their metabolites with respect to those of dopamine and its metabolites.

VI.4. Intracellular metabolism

VI.4.1. Monoamine oxidase (MAO)

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) catalyzes the conversion of cytoplasmic dopamine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL) and cytoplasmic norepinephrine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL).

Differential susceptibilities to monoamine oxidase

It has recently been recognized that dopamine is a better substrate than norepinephrine for both isoforms of monoamine oxidase (MAO), MAO-A and MAO-B (27). Both catecholamines are better substrates for MAO-A than MAO-B.

VI.4.2. Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and aldehyde reductase

Differential susceptibilities to aldehyde dehydrogenase & aldehyde/aldose reductase

The product of MAO acting on dopamine is 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL), and the product of MAO acting on norepinephrine and epinephrine is 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL). DOPAL is metabolized mainly by aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) to form the acid 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC). DOPEGAL is metabolized mainly by aldehyde/aldose reductase (AR) to form the glycol 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG). This difference explains why the acid, homovanillic acid (HVA), is the main end-product of dopamine metabolism, while the glycol, 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG), is the main end-product of norepinephrine (and epinephrine) metabolism. In the liver, MHPG is converted to vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) via alcohol dehydrogenase and then aldehyde dehydrogenase (276).

VI.5. Exocytosis

In humans, the intra-neuronal norepinephrine metabolite DHPG tracks vesicular cycling and reuptake, so when exocytotic release increases, plasma DHPG rises via neuronal uptake of released norepinephrine. Conversely, suppression of release lowers DHPG, demonstrating tight coupling to norepinephrine turnover (277). Plasma DHPG increases during sympathetic stimulation but less steeply than norepinephrine, consistent with plasma DHPG being derived importantly from ongoing leakage of norepinephrine from vesicular stores independently of sympathetically-mediated exocytosis (277279). Plasma MHPG (an extra-neuronal/whole-body norepinephrine metabolite) also increases (280). DOPAC and HVA primarily are related to dopamine turnover and are less direct readouts of sympathetic noradrenergic activation than DHPG and MHPG (277, 280).

VI.6. Reuptake

Neuronal uptake of dopamine from the extracellular fluid is mediated by the cell membrane dopamine transporter (DAT), and neuronal uptake of norepinephrine is mediated by the cell membrane NE transporter (NET).

Norepinephrine is a better substrate for neuronal uptake (Uptake-1) via the NET than is epinephrine (281), and dopamine is a better substrate than norepinephrine for uptake via the NET (282). The latter helps explain why 18F-dopamine is an excellent imaging agent for visualizing cardiac sympathetic innervation by positron emission tomography (283).

VI.7. Extracellular uptake and metabolism

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) converts DOPA to methoxytyrosine (3-MT), dopamine to methoxytyramine (3-MTy), norepinephrine to normetanephrine (NMN), and epinephrine to metanephrine (MN) (32, 284).

Brain catecholaminergic nuclei express relatively little COMT (51, 285290), whereas most non-neuronal cells do (291295).

Whether sympathetic nerves express COMT has not been tested directly. Indirect evidence suggests low intra-neuronal COMT activity in cardiac sympathetic nerves, based on far greater entry of DHPG than of MHPG into the venous drainage of the heart (274); however, surgical denervation of the aorta and destruction of sympathetic nerves by 6-hydroxydopamine decrease COMT activity (296).

Different fates of circulating vs. neuronal catecholamines

The organic cation transporter 3 OCT3 (SLC22A3) and plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT, SLC29A4) mediate non-neuronal uptake, which is linked to cytoplasmic degradative enzymes. Neuronal catecholamines are degraded extensively by reuptake via the Uptake-1 process via the NET, followed by intra-neuronal metabolism by monoamine oxidase (MAO), whereas circulating catecholamines are removed extensively by extra-neuronal uptake via the Uptake-2 process (297, 298).

VI.8. Physiological implications of observed patterns

The observation of particular patterns of levels of catecholamines and their metabolites has implications for potential physiological correlates (Table 3). For instance, high levels of dopamine and its metabolites with respect to norepinephrine and its metabolites may indicate low DBH activity, while elevations of DOPA and its metabolites compared to the catecholamines and their metabolites may indicate low LAAAD activity.

Most publications relating catecholamine metabolic patterns to alterations in intracellular processes are based on drug effects (Table 4). One should interpret these relationships with caution, especially for drugs such as MAO and NET inhibitors that readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier and may indirectly affect autonomic outflows.

Table 4:

Catecholamine-related biochemical patterns associated with decreased activities of intracellular processes

Process (decreased activity) Increased biochemicals (full names) Increased biochemicals (abbreviations) Decreased biochemicals (full names) Decreased biochemicals (abbreviations)
LAAAD 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine; 3-Methoxytyrosine; 5-S-CysteinylDOPA DOPA; 3-MTyr; Cys-DOPA Dopamine; Norepinephrine; Epinephrine; Metanephrine DA; NE; EPI; MN
COMT 5-S-CysteinylDOPA; Dopamine; Norepinephrine; Epinephrine Cys-DOPA; DA; NE; EPI 3-Methoxytyrosine; 3-Methoxytyramine; 3-Methoxytyramine-sulfate 3-MTyr; 3-MT; 3-MT-S
MAO Dopamine; 5-S-Cysteinyldopamine DA; Cys-DA 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde; 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethanol; Homovanillic acid; 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; Vanillylmandelic acid DOPAL; DOPAC; DOPET; HVA; MHPG; VMA
ALDH 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde DOPAL 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid DOPAC
AR Vanillylmandelic acid VMA 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol MHPG
DBH Dopamine DA Norepinephrine; Epinephrine; 3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; MHPG-sulfate; Vanillylmandelic acid NE; EPI; MHPG; MHPG-S; VMA
Vesicular uptake Dopamine; 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid DA; DOPAC Norepinephrine; 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylglycol NE; DHPG

VII. CATECHOLAMINE METABOLOMIC PATTERNS AS BIOMARKERS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL STATES

Catecholamine systems participate not only in “fight-or-flight” emergencies to maintain homeostasis, as promulgated in this journal by Walter B. Cannon almost a century ago (299), but also in activities of daily living such as orthostasis, exercise, and meal ingestion. This section describes catecholamine metabolic patterns associated with physiological states and compares homeostasis with the relatively new concept of allostasis as integrative physiological ideas (230). The relevant literature is tabulated in Table 6.

Table 6:

Effects of some physiological changes on levels of DOPA, catecholamines, and catecholamine metabolites

Physiol. Change DOPA DA NE EPI DOPAC DHPG DA Sulfate NMN MN HVA MHPG NE Sulfate References
Orthostasis
No change Increase ++ No change No change (483)
Increase ++ Increase + (276)
No change Increase + Increase ++ Increase + No change Increase + (484)
Increase + Increase ++ (306)
Exercise
Increase ++ Increase ++ Increase +++ (485)
Increase + (279)
Increase +++ Increase ++++ Increase +++ (486)
Increase ++ Increase ++ No change Increase + (310)
Increase ++ Increase +++ Increase +++ (487)
Increase +++ Increase ++++ Increase +++ (488)
Increase +++ (489)
Increase ++ Increase +++ (277)
Increase +++ Increase ++++ Increase +++ (490)
Increase ++ Increase +++ Increase ++++ (491)
Increase ++ Increase ++ Increase +++ (492)
Increase ++ Increase ++ Increase ++ Decrease − Decrease − (309)
Increase +++ Increase +++ Increase ++ (493)
Increase + Increase ++ Increase ++ Increase ++ (494)
Increase +++ Increase +++ Increase ++ Increase ++ (495)
Meal
Increase ++ Increase + Increase +++ (352)
Increase ++ (496)
Increase ++ Increase ++ (497)
Increase + Increase ++ Increase + Increase ++ Increase ++++ (45)
Increase + Decrease − (318)
Increase + Increase + Decrease − Increase ++ (323)
Increase + Increase ++ (317)
Increase ++ (498)
Increase ++++ Increase + (41)
Glucoprivation
Increase ++ Increase ++++ (499)
Increase + Increase +++ (500)
Increase + Increase +++ (501)
Increase ++ Increase ++++ (502)
Increase ++ Increase +++ (503)
Increase ++ Increase +++ (504)
Increase ++ Increase ++++ (505)
Increase + Increase +++ (506)
No change Increase ++ Increase ++++ No change Decrease − (319)
Increase + Increase ++++ Decrease − (320)
Increase ++ Increase +++ (507)
Altered Environmental Temp.
(328)
(331)
(508)
Decrease − No change (326)

Sustained catecholamine release must be matched by increased synthesis if releasable stores are to be maintained. In sympathetic nerves, Weiner and colleagues showed that nerve stimulation increases norepinephrine synthesis and that cocaine and catecholamine-releasing drugs modify this relationship, supporting functional coupling among release, reuptake, synthesis, and transmitter-store status (338). Analogous stimulus–secretion–synthesis coupling is well established in the adrenal medulla, where stress-level splanchnic firing recruits PACAP-dependent peptidergic signaling to support both catecholamine secretion and catecholamine-biosynthetic enzyme expression (156, 160). In brain catecholaminergic systems, prolonged biosynthetic load also occurs during psychostimulant exposure: d-amphetamine acutely increases striatal catecholamine synthesis, whereas chronic cocaine alters tyrosine hydroxylase expression and activity in dopaminergic cell groups (339341). These observations support the concept that catecholaminergic neurons and chromaffin cells use activity- and drug-responsive biosynthetic adaptations to limit depletion during prolonged transmitter mobilization.

VII.1. Orthostasis

The challenges posed by prolonged upright posture are comparatively new developments in human evolution (130), since the conversion to bipedalism occurred relatively recently—Homo erectus appeared only about 2 million years ago (342). One may speculate that because of this relatively short timespan, only one physiological system has evolved to adjust to orthostatic stress—the SNS (149).

The integrated response to orthostasis reflects interoception mediated by “low-pressure” baroreceptors especially in the walls of the atria and pulmonary veins and “high-pressure” baroreceptors in the walls of arteries such as in the carotid sinuses. Although there are some differences in terms of responses of different neuroendocrine systems (343), in general orthostasis releases the SNS from baroreceptor restraint. Plasma norepinephrine normally approximately doubles within 5’ of standing up from the supine position (344). Plasma DHPG increases concurrently by a smaller fraction (277). There are also small increases in plasma dopamine, probably reflecting exocytotic co-release with norepinephrine from sympathetic nerves (302). In contrast, plasma levels of DOPA and dopamine metabolites change by little during orthostasis (Table 5).

Table 5:

Effects of some drugs on levels of DOPA, catecholamines, and catecholamine metabolites

Drug DA DOPAC HVA DA Sulfate NE EPI DHPG NMN MN MHPG NE Sulfate
AMPT (metyrosine)
(340)
(466) Decrease − Decrease −
(467) Decrease − Decrease −
Clonidine (alpha-2 agonist) Decrease − − − Decrease − −
(468) Decrease − − − Decrease − −
(469) Decrease − − −
(276) Decrease − − − Decrease − −
COMT inhibitors
(347) Increase ++ Decrease − Increase +++ Decrease −
(346) Increase ++ Increase ++
(470) Increase ++ Increase ++ Increase ++
Droxidopa (L-DOPS,oral/infusion)
(471) Increase ++
(345) Increase + Increase ++
(346) Increase + Increase +
Levodopa
(352) Increase + Increase ++++
(472) Increase + Increase ++++
Levodopa+Carbidopa
(352) Increase + Increase ++
MAO inhibitors
(357) Decrease −− − Increase + Increase + Decrease − − − Decrease − − −
(356) Decrease − − Decrease − − − No change Decrease − −
(473) Decrease − − Decrease − −
(474) Decrease − − − Decrease − − −
Neuronal reuptake inhibitors
(475) Increase ++ Increase +++
(476) Increase ++
(276) Increase + Decrease −
(477) Increase + Decrease −
(478) Increase +++
(479) Increase ++
Reserpine (VMAT inhibitor)
(360) Decrease − No change
(278) Decrease − − Increase ++ Decrease − −
Trimethaphan (ganglionic blocker)
(479) Decrease − −
Tyramine (IV)
(480) Increase + No change
(361) Increase + Increase ++
Yohimbine (alpha-2 antagonist)
(481) Increase +++ Increase +
(276) Increase +++ Increase + Increase +
(482) Increase +++ Increase + Increase +

VII.2. Exercise

During dynamic exercise in humans, plasma catecholamines increase in proportion to workload and intensity. Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine rise progressively and show larger increases above the individual anaerobic (lactate) threshold compared with below threshold workloads, indicating enhanced activation of both the SNS and SAS as metabolic demand increases (345, 346) (Table 5). Plasma norepinephrine typically increases earlier and to a greater extent than epinephrine at moderate intensities, with epinephrine showing sharp rises as intensity passes the anaerobic threshold, consistent with SAS recruitment.

The literature on effects of exercise on catecholamine metabolites is relatively sparse. Plasma DOPA, O-methylated metabolites, and NE-sulfate increase (Table 5). Plasma DHPG and MHPG increase to a proportionately smaller extent than norepinephrine (278, 280). Plasma dopamine increases, with smaller or no increases in DA-sulfate (305, 312). Figure 8 compares the catecholamine metabolomic pattern during cycling exercise with that during supine rest.

Figure 8: Catecholamine metabolic pattern in cardiac sympathetic nerves with exercise.

Figure 8:

Abbreviations: COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; Cys-DOPA=5-S-cysteinylDOPA; DA=dopamine; DOPA=3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; NE=norepinephrine; NMN=normetanephrine; TYR=tyrosine; U1=Uptake-1; U2=Uptake-2. Adapted from (11, 274)

VII.3. Meal ingestion

According to a widely held and still persistent concept, the parasympathetic nervous system is the “rest-and-digest” component of the autonomic nervous system, whereas the opposing sympathetic nervous system is the “fight-or-flight” emergency system (347, 348). Perhaps ironically, differential responses of plasma catecholamine levels to meal ingestion belie this notion (Table 5). The sympathetic nervous system can be viewed as containing three sub-systems based on the chemical messenger—the sympathetic noradrenergic system (SNS, with norepinephrine the neurotransmitter involved with adjustments in the distribution of the cardiac output), the sympathetic adrenergic system (SAS, with epinephrine the hormone participating in glucose homeostasis), and the sympathetic cholinergic system (SCS, with acetylcholine the neurotransmitter involved with thermoregulatory sweating) (349). After meal ingestion there is a dissociation between plasma norepinephrine, which increases (350), especially after a high-carbohydrate meal (351, 352), and plasma epinephrine, which decreases (319, 321). The rest-and-digest vs. fight-or-flight dichotomy does not account for this differential catecholaminergic response.

After prolonged (72-hour) fasting, meal ingestion results in large increases in plasma levels of DA-sulfate (46), with only modest changes in free dopamine or DOPA, indicating a dominant role for local extensive sulfoconjugation rather than increased SNS outflow. After prolonged fasting there is still a substantial amount of circulating DA-sulfate, consistent with ongoing endogenous production in the DOPA-dopamine autocrine-paracrine system (45).

VII.4. Glucoprivation

Numerous studies have assessed effects of acute glucoprivic stress evoked by insulin or 2-deoxyglucose on plasma levels of catecholamines. Glucoprivation markedly increases SAS outflow, and this dominates the catecholamine response. There are smaller and regionally heterogeneous increases in SNS outflows (331, 332). The small increases in plasma NE in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia reflect adrenomedullary output (353, 354).

Prolonged fasting alters activities of a variety of effector systems. Glucose and insulin levels decline, while arterial glucagon increases, and beta-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, and palmitate levels increase markedly, associated with small increases in plasma NE and EPI (320). Norepinephrine spillover in adipose tissue increases, suggesting a contribution of locally increased SNS outflow to the lipolytic response.

VII.5. Thermoregulation

It has long been known that in humans thermoregulation during exposure to high environmental temperature depends on evaporative heat loss (355, 356), which reflects two processes— sweating from activation of the sympathetic cholinergic system (SCS) and cutaneous vasodilation from inhibition of SNS outflow (149, 337, 349, 357). Conversely, cold exposure increases SNS outflows, decreasing cutaneous blood flow. There is relatively little change in SAS outflow unless there is an actual decline in core temperature (334, 335, 358, 359). Plasma EPI changes little during exposure to dry heat but increases during exposure to humid heat (337), a situation where evaporative heat loss is impaired.

Skin surface cooling improves orthostatic tolerance, probably via increased SNS outflows. Plasma NE levels increase (360), as does central venous pressure (361).

VII.6. Homeostasis vs. allostasis

Until relatively recently, effects of physiological changes were viewed as following the stimulus. According to the concept of allostasis (6, 7, 362), physiological changes can occur in anticipation of the stimulus, based on instinct, imprinting, or conditioning (9, 363).

For all five physiological changes described above there can be anticipatory adjustments in advance of the stimulus. For instance, it is common human experience that people eat more from habit than from sensed metabolic need, and they don winter coats before venturing out into the cold. In patients with postural tachycardia syndrome, heart rate can increase as part of a conditioned fear response before head-up tilt table testing (364).

Evidence that “central command” (anticipation/volitional drive at the start of exercise) can elevate plasma catecholamines before or very soon after exercise onset comes from original human studies. In resistance exercise with deliberate pre-effort arousal, plasma NE and EPI increased before the first work set (anticipatory rise), and then increased further during sets (365). Rapid, early increases in plasma NE with the start of dynamic exercise are also well documented, consistent with an immediate feed-forward component (366). For metabolites, simultaneous sampling during graded cycling showed that plasma DHPG rises with sympathetic activation during exercise—though less steeply than NE—supporting very early increased intra-neuronal turnover when exercise begins (278), in advance of metabolic need.

VIII. CATECHOLAMINE METABOLOMIC PATTERNS AS BIOMARKERS OF DRUG EFFECTS

Numerous drugs directly or indirectly affect activities of catecholamine-related processes. Some of the more prominent drugs and their associated biochemical patterns are listed in Table 5 and described below.

VIII.1. Alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (AMPT)

Alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (AMPT, Demser) competes with tyrosine for TH. AMPT administration produces a particular pattern of plasma levels of catechols. Plasma DOPA levels decrease (392), as one would expect from TH inhibition. Despite daily repeated AMPT administration, however, plasma DOPA partly recovers (367). Plasma DOPAC and DHPG are persistently severely decreased, while NE is decreased slightly.

VIII.2. Alpha-methyldopa

Alpha-methyldopa (Aldomet) is a centrally acting antihypertensive prodrug that is metabolized in the brain to α-methylnorepinephrine, which activates central α2-adrenergic receptors to decrease sympathetic outflow and lower arterial pressure (393). Biochemically, alpha-methyldopa decreases plasma NE concentrations in parallel with reductions in blood pressure, reflecting diminished noradrenergic neurotransmission; similar patterns of reduced catecholamines have been observed with alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists (394).

VIII.3. Carbidopa and benserazide

Carbidopa is a catechol that inhibits LAAAD outside the brain. Combining levodopa with carbidopa was revolutionary in the treatment of PD (395), because the limiting side effect of levodopa is nausea and vomiting due to increased dopamine production, and carbidopa attenuates (but does not block) levodopa-induced dopamine production outside the brain. Because existing human data focus almost exclusively on carbidopa given with levodopa, there is little published information documenting effects of carbidopa alone on plasma catecholamines and their metabolites. Carbidopa decreases urinary NE excretion (396). Benserazide is also a peripherally acting LAAAD inhibitor that in some formulations is co-administered with levodopa to reduce peripheral conversion of levodopa to dopamine.

VIII.4. Droxidopa

In contrast with levodopa, which exerts effects mainly on dopamine and dopamine metabolites with little effect on NE and NE metabolites, droxidopa (L-DOPS, 3,4-L-threo-dihydroxyphenylserine, Northera) affects levels of NE and its metabolites with little effect on dopamine and dopamine metabolites. After oral dosing, plasma NE rises modestly while deaminated NE metabolites increase robustly. As one would expect, carbidopa blunts both the increases in NE and DHPG/DHMA, while COMT inhibition with entacapone augments the metabolite responses (373, 376).

VIII.5. COMT inhibition

COMT inhibitors such as entacapone decrease levels of end-products of catecholamine metabolism while building up levels of the deaminated metabolites (372, 373). COMT inhibition is clinically important in Parkinson disease, where peripheral COMT inhibitors reduce peripheral O-methylation of levodopa, thereby increasing the bioavailability of levodopa and prolonging its symptomatic effect. In addition to entacapone and tolcapone, the newer once-daily COMT inhibitor opicapone is now in clinical use as adjunctive therapy for levodopa-treated patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Opicapone reduces daily OFF time and increases ON time without troublesome dyskinesia, supporting continued therapeutic relevance of COMT as a target in catecholamine pharmacology (397).

VIII.6. Levodopa

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (levodopa, DOPA) is the immediate product of the rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis—hydroxylation of tyrosine by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). Clinically, levodopa/carbidopa remains the gold-standard symptomatic therapy for Parkinson disease (PD). In humans, plasma DOPA reflects multiple sources: dietary contributions and intestinal handling, plus production in sympathetic nerves (320, 367). Levodopa administration markedly increases plasma levels of DOPA, Cys-DOPA, dopamine, and dopamine metabolites. Although carbidopa attenuates these effects, the amount of substrate for LAAAD is so large that levodopa/carbidopa increases levels of dopamine and its metabolites (398, 399).

Levodopa produces little or no acute change in plasma levels of NE and only modest or negligible effects on major norepinephrine metabolites (316, 400402).

The main circulating metabolites of levodopa are 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) and its sulfate conjugate, 3-O-methyldopa sulfate (3-OMD-S) (403). Concentrations of 3-OMD average many times the concentration of DOPA.

VIII.7. MAO inhibition

Effects of MAO inhibitors on levels of catecholamines and their metabolites are predictable from the central position of MAO in the fate of cytoplasmic dopamine and NE (379). MAO-A inhibition markedly decreases levels of DHPG, MHPG, and HVA, with smaller increases in NE and EPI and no change in DOPA (378). Treatment with MAO-B inhibitors such as selegiline and rasagiline can result in a catecholamine metabolic profile indicating MAO-A inhibition (404, 405).

VIII.8. VMAT inhibition

Reserpine is a classic inhibitor of vesicular uptake of cytoplasmic monoamines. Since NE synthesis takes place in vesicles, reserpine depletes NE stores (387). Reserpine administration transiently increases plasma DHPG levels, due to ongoing passive leakage of NE stores, followed by low NE, DHPG, and MHPG levels when the stores become depleted (279). Plasma EPI levels, however, are increased.

VIII.9. Tyramine

Infusion of the indirectly acting sympathomimetic amine tyramine displaces NE from vesicular stores, increasing plasma DHPG more than plasma NE (389). Because neuronal uptake of tyramine from the extracellular fluid depends on the cell membrane norepinephrine transporter (NET), tyramine infusion testing was used to identify “neuropathic” POTS (406) and POTS related to hypofunctional variation of the SLC6A2 gene that encodes the NET (407). Tyramine infusion also has been used to assess functional effects of cardiac sympathetic denervation (389). It should be noted that some of the research was compromised, in that tyramine in aqueous solution that is stored at temperatures above −70° degrees centigrade undergoes spontaneous oxidation to form dopamine (408, 409).

VIII.10. ALDH inhibition

A variety of drugs inhibit aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), such as disulfiram, (Antabuse), daidzein, and benomyl. The metabolic toxin rotenone inhibits ALDH indirectly, by blocking mitochondrial complex 1. This decreases generation of NAD+, which is a required co-factor for ALDH (53).

VIII.11. Neuronal reuptake inhibition

Inhibition of neuronal uptake prevents the formation of DHPG from exogenous NE and halves the formation of MHPG, indicating that DHPG is derived from NE metabolized intra-neuronally (279). All inhibitors of neuronal reuptake of NE, whether cocaine, tricyclic antidepressants, amphetamines, or “oxetines,” increase NE with respect to DHPG.

VIII.12. Adrenoceptors

Yohimbine is a selective α2-adrenoceptor antagonist that acts both centrally and peripherally to augment release of NE from sympathetic nerves (410, 411). The imidazoline clonidine exerts opposite effects by stimulating α2-adrenoceptors in the brain and periphery, inhibiting sympathetic outflows and attenuating NE release for a given amount of nerve traffic (94).

IX. CATECHOLAMINE METABOLOMIC PATTERNS AS BIOMARKERS OF PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STATES

Myriad pathophysiological states are associated with alterations in levels of catecholamines and their metabolites. Some of these are listed in Table 7. This section highlights conditions that feature catecholamine metabolomic patterns indicating specific abnormalities in the synthesis, storage, reuptake, or metabolism of catecholamines.

Table 7:

Effects of some pathophysiological changes on levels of DOPA, catecholamines, and catecholamine metabolites

Pathophysiological state Characteristic catecholamine/metabolite pattern Key analytes / ratios References
Monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A deficiency Markedly ↓ deaminated monoamine metabolites, especially DHPG, preserved NE & EPI, diversion to O-methylation DHPG ↓↓↓; NMN/DHPG ↑↑; plasma NE ~normal. (241)
Dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DBH) deficiency Markedly ↑ DA with very low/absent NE and EPI; ↑ DOPAC with very low DHPG and MHPG; high DA/NE and DOPAC/DHPG ratios DA, NE, EPI, DOPAC, DHPG; DA/NE, DOPAC/DHPG (373); (509)
HSAN III (familial dysautonomia) Low basal plasma NE; blunted NE increase to orthostasis; ↑ DOPAC/DHPG ratio; ↑ EPI during “crises” Plasma NE (supine/upright); EPI; NE response to tilt (510); (377); (375); (511)
Menkes disease ↑ DA/NE; ↑ DOPAC/DHPG; ↑ HVA/MHPG; ↑ DOPA DA, NE, DOPA, DOPAC, DHPG; DA/NE (376); (231)
PPGL ↑ plasma free normetanephrine/metanephrine; ↑ methoxytyramine (DA tumors) NMN, MN, 3-MT (512); (513)
Neuroblastoma ↑ urinary HVA and VMA HVA, VMA (514); (515)
Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) ↑ cardiac NE spillover; ↑ standing plasma NE in “hyperadrenergic POTS”; normal arterial NE/DHPG); ↑ arterial EPI Cardiac NE spillover (supine); plasma NE (supine and standing); arterial plasma NE, DHPG, and EPI (402); (362); (403)
Malignant melanoma ↑ plasma/urine 5-S-cysteinyldopa Cys-DOPA (387); (389)
Congestive heart failure ↓ myocardial NE despite ↑ spillover NE, DHPG (516); (391); (11)
Neurocardiogenic syncope Disproportionate ↑ EPI relative to NE (sympathoadrenal imbalance) EPI/NE (265); (517)
Takotsubo syndrome Acute ↑ plasma catecholamines; ↑ cardiac NE spillover EPI, NE, coronary sinus NE (250); (518); (519)
Obesity ↑ regional NE spillover; altered clearance; ↓ fasting EPI in some NE spillover, EPI (520); (521)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Early: ↑ NE activity; Late: ↓ NE/DHPG NE, DHPG (522); (523)

Abbreviations and interpretive notes: DA, dopamine; NE, norepinephrine; EPI, epinephrine; DOPA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DOPAC, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; HVA, homovanillic acid; DHPG, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; MHPG, 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; NMN, normetanephrine; MN, metanephrine; 3-MT, 3-methoxytyramine; Cys-DOPA, 5-S-cysteinyldopa; DBH, dopamine-β-hydroxylase; SNS, sympathetic noradrenergic system; SAS, sympathetic adrenergic (adrenomedullary) system.

IX.1. Genetic disorders of catecholamine biosynthesis

IX.1.1. Decreased tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity

Decreased TH activity can reflect genotypic variants of the enzyme itself or decreased provision of its required co-factor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4, Figure 9). Since BH4 is required also for activity of phenylalanine hydroxylase, tryptophan hydroxylase, and nitric oxide synthase, the biochemical phenotypes for hypofunctional variants of genes required for BH4 synthesis or recycling differ from those for decreased TH activity alone. BH4 synthesis/recycling defects manifest with signs of combined monoamine neurotransmitter deficiency (dopamine+norepinephrine+serotonin) and hyperphenylalaninemia (436, 437). The catecholamine metabolic pattern distal to the TH step is the same, with low levels of the catecholamines, their metabolites, and DOPA and its metabolites (438).

Figure 9: Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) synthesis and recycling.

Figure 9:

(Left) Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) is synthesized from guanosine triphosphate (GTP) via a three-step pathway involving GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH1), 6-pyruvoyltetrahydropterin synthase (PTPS), and sepiapterin reductase (SPR). BH4 is an obligate co-factor for phenylalanine hydroxylase and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). The latter catalyzes the conversion of tyrosine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). (Right) During the hydroxylation reaction, BH4 is oxidized to dihydrobiopterin, which is rapidly reduced back to BH4 by dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR) using NADH as an electron donor, thereby maintaining intracellular BH4 availability independently of de novo synthesis. Other abbreviations: GTP=guanosine triphosphate; NADH=reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; PCD=pterin-4a-carbinolamine dehydratase.

IX.1.2. Decreased L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase (LAAAD) activity

The catecholamine metabolomic phenotype in LAAAD deficiency is distinctive and different from TH deficiency in that concentrations of DOPA and its metabolites (especially 3-O-methyldopa) are built up compared to catecholamines and their metabolites (235, 439). Since LAAAD is required for conversion of 5-hydroxytryptophan to serotonin, levels of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, the main end-product of serotonin metabolism, are low in patients with LAAAD deficiency.

IX.1.3. Decreased norepinephrine biosynthesis

Unlike dopamine, norepinephrine is synthesized within vesicles (or in chromaffin cells in storage granules). The required enzyme is dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH). In addition to DBH deficiency itself, which is very rare (412, 440, 441), several genetic disorders entail the same general pattern of signs and symptoms of norepinephrine deficiency, such as neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Some of these genetic disorders are familial dysautonomia (hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy Type III), deficiency of the type 2 vesicular monoamine transporter encoded by the SLC18A2 gene, mutation of CYB561 (cytochrome b561), which is required for appropriate supply of ascorbate (55, 233), and Menkes disease, discussed in more detail below. These conditions are associated with decreased levels of norepinephrine metabolites such as DHPG compared to dopamine metabolites such as DOPAC (10, 232, 416).

Menkes disease

Menkes disease is an X-linked recessive pediatric disorder caused by defective copper transport due to variants of the copper ATPase gene ATP7A. Because DBH contains, and its activity absolutely requires, copper, Menkes disease patients have low DBH activity. From the concept diagram in Figure 6, decreased DBH activity results in high ratios of DA/NE and their respective metabolites DOPAC/DHPG and HVA/MHPG. Menkes disease patients also have increased DOPA levels, consistent with compensatorily increased TH activity. Given that Menkes disease is transmitted as an X-linked recessive trait, among at-risk newborn males one-half would have the disease and one-half would neither have the disease nor be a carrier.

Figure 6: Relationships of extracellular fluid levels of catecholamines and metabolites to reactions within sympathetic nerves.

Figure 6:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Abbreviations: ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; Cys-DOPA=5-S-cysteinylDOPA; DA=dopamine; DBH=dopamine-beta-hydroxylase; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DOPA=3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; DOPAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde; DOPEGAL=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde; EPI=epinephrine; HVA=homovanillic acid; LAAAD=L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; NE=norepinephrine.

In the past two decades it has been established that the pattern of increased plasma DOPAC/DHPG, DOPA/DHPG, and DA/NE ratios is perfectly sensitive and specific for diagnosing Menkes disease in at-risk newborns (232, 418). As indicated in Table 6, Menkes disease shares with familial dysautonomia (type 3 hereditary and sensory autonomic neuropathy, HSAN III) and with DBH deficiency a catecholamine metabolic pattern in which the dopamine metabolite DOPAC is built up with respect to the NE metabolite DHPG (415, 416).

IX.1.4. Decreased epinephrine biosynthesis

There is no known human inborn error of metabolism that is caused by isolated PNMT deficiency. Since cortisol is trophic for PNMT, congenital disorders such as 21-hydroxylase deficiency that result in decreased delivery of cortisol to adrenomedullary chromaffin cells are associated with low levels of metanephrine (442).

IX.1.5. Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS)

In congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) the disease pathogenesis is not from abnormal catecholamine biosynthesis but from heterozygous mutations (most commonly polyalanine repeat expansions) in PHOX2B, which encodes a homeobox transcription factor that is required for development of sympathetic nerves. CCHS does not exhibit a reproducible catecholamine metabolomic signature.

IX.2. Genetic disorders of catecholamine metabolism

IX.2.1. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) deficiency

Genetic MAO-A deficiency and combined MAO-A/B deficiency are associated with a distinctive, abnormal catecholamine metabolic pattern that includes markedly reduced deaminated norepinephrine metabolites (especially DHPG), preservation of levels of the catecholamines themselves, and diversion of metabolism toward O-methylated products, including increased normetanephrine and normetanephrine sulfate (13). In contrast, isolated MAO-B deficiency has no particular catecholamine metabolomic phenotype.

IX.2.2. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) deficiency

There is no known Mendelian disorder involving catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) deficiency, despite the enzyme being encoded by a single gene (COMT) located on the long arm of chromosome 22 at 22q11.21. The frequently studied polymorphism Val158Met (rs4680) (443)is not associated with a known catecholamine metabolic signature; however, plasma metanephrines have not been reported in individuals harboring the Val158Met polymorphism.

IX.3. Neural crest tumors

Neural-crest tumors are characterized by distinctive patterns of catecholamines and metabolites that reflect both tumor biosynthetic activity and downstream metabolism. Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) continuously produce catecholamines that are O-methylated within the tumor, and so plasma free metanephrines (normetanephrine and metanephrine) are markedly elevated and provide high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity compared with levels of the parent catecholamines (295, 444).

Elevated plasma methoxytyramine is now recognized as a biomarker of dopamine-producing PPGLs and correlates with metastatic potential (445).

It should be noted that a substantial proportion of PPGLs reflect germline mutations of genes regulating hypoxia signaling (e.g., VHL, endothelial PAS domain protein 1/hypoxia-inducible factor 2A), mitochondrial metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (e.g., succinate dehydrogenase complex genes, fumarate hydratase), and receptor tyrosine kinase/growth signaling genes (e.g., rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene (RET), neurofibromin 1 (NF1), transmembrane protein 127 (TMEM127), MYC-associated factor X (MAX)) (446, 447).

In neuroblastoma, another neural crest–derived tumor, catecholamine metabolism is also altered with high excretion rates of HVA and VMA in urine reflecting increased catecholamine turnover. LaBrosse et al. were the first to recognize metabolism within the tumors and that there is impaired vesicular storage due to minimal vesicles (448). Since norepinephrine is synthesized in vesicles, dopamine metabolites are the most importantly elevated biomarkers. Recent work supports the supplemental value of plasma 3-methoxytyramine and 3-O-methyldopa for disease detection and monitoring (449, 450).

Malignant melanoma, also derived from neural crest melanocytes, does not classically overproduce catecholamines but shows alterations in melanin-associated catechol metabolites. In melanoma, 5-S-cysteinyldopa (Cys-DOPA)—related to pheomelanin synthesis—is elevated in the plasma and urine of patients with metastatic disease and correlates with tumor burden and progression, making Cys-DOPA a useful biochemical marker alongside imaging and clinical evaluation (425, 426, 451).

Collectively, PPGL biochemical signatures are dominated by elevated metanephrines and methoxytyramine, neuroblastoma by HVA/VMA excess, and melanoma by high Cys-DOPA reflecting melanin pathway activity. The specific metabolite profiles can improve diagnosis, staging, and monitoring.

IX.4. Heart failure

In congestive heart failure (CHF), sympathetic noradrenergic activation initially supports cardiac output but ultimately promotes myocardial remodeling, arrhythmogenesis, and progressive worsening of cardiac dysfunction. It has long been recognized that CHF is associated with myocardial norepinephrine depletion (452). Although one might attribute the depletion to denervation, this would not explain increased entry of endogenous norepinephrine into the cardiac venous drainage (11, 428). Estimated rates of several reactions have indicated that instead, myocardial norepinephrine deficiency in CHF reflects multiple concurrent functional abnormalities in cardiac sympathetic nerves (11) (Figure 10). Increased release of norepinephrine and decreased efficiency of norepinephrine reuptake both contribute to increased cardiac noradrenergic drive in CHF. Decreased norepinephrine store size in the failing heart therefore appears to result not from insufficient TH but from chronically increased norepinephrine turnover and reduced norepinephrine recycling.

Figure 10: Catecholamine metabolic pattern in cardiac sympathetic nerves in congestive heart failure.

Figure 10:

Abbreviations: COMT=catechol-O-methyltransferase; Cys-DOPA=5-S-cysteinylDOPA; DA=dopamine; DBH=dopamine-beta-hydroxylase; DOPA=3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; MAO=monoamine oxidase; MHPG=3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol; NE=norepinephrine; NMN=normetanephrine; TYR=tyrosine; U1=Uptake-1; U2=Uptake-2. Adapted from (11).

IX.3.1. Takotsubo cardiopathy

Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy is characterized by an acute catecholaminergic surge rather than a distinctive steady-state metabolomic signature. In their seminal report, Wittstein et al. demonstrated that patients presenting with stress cardiomyopathy had markedly elevated plasma catecholamine concentrations—including epinephrine, norepinephrine, DHPG, and dopamine—often several-fold higher than levels observed in comparison patients with Killip class III myocardial infarction (250). This extreme catecholamine excess supports a pathophysiological model of acute sympathoadrenal activation and intense cardiac sympathetic nerve discharge, leading to myocardial stunning via beta-adrenoceptor mediated calcium overload, microvascular dysfunction, and possibly direct catecholamine toxicity (453).

IX.5. Catecholamines and disorders of the “central stress system”

Catecholamines in the brain are integral components of the “central stress system,” interacting with corticotropin-releasing hormone and other mediators to coordinate neural, endocrine, and autonomic responses that maintain homeostasis under threat.

Numerous studies have reported on secondary changes in enzyme phosphorylation, gene expression, proteomic, or epigenetic changes consequent to exposure to distressing stimuli such as immobilization in rats (454461). Stress-evoked changes in catecholamine and metabolite levels are well documented and occur rapidly, reflecting altered neural firing, secretion, and turnover rather than downstream gene or proteomic programs. These level changes typically normalize quickly after stress cessation (462). Thus, most observed stress-induced alterations in levels of catecholamines and their metabolites represent primary functional activation of catecholaminergic systems, without clear consequences of stress-induced molecular remodeling.

IX.5.1. Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS)

Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is not associated with a specific overall biochemical signature. Cardiac norepinephrine spillover is increased even during supine rest (423). Plasma norepinephrine normally approximately doubles during orthostasis, and a standing plasma NE concentration > 600 pg/mL has been taken to indicate “hyperadrenergic POTS” (407). This operational criterion does not separate the absolute from the relative magnitude of the orthostatic increase from supine baseline. Analyses of arterial plasma norepinephrine and DHPG do not support a major defect in neuronal uptake, whereas arterial plasma epinephrine is increased, implicating tonic sympathetic adrenergic system activation (424).

IX.5.2. Neurocardiogenic syncope (fainting)

According to the “collapse firing” hypothesis of syncope (463), the sudden cardiovascular collapse arises from a paradoxical afferent signal originating in the underfilled, hypercontractile left ventricle. Under conditions such as prolonged standing or sudden emotional stress, venous return decreases while sympathetic tone remains high, and the resulting small, vigorously contracting heart activates cardiac C-fiber afferents, which project via the vagus to medullary cardiovascular centers. This input triggers reflex withdrawal of sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow and enhancement of parasympathetic (vagal) activity, producing vasodilation, bradycardia, and hypotension.

A variety of studies have refuted the “collapse-firing” hypothesis. Syncope can occur in patients with denervated (transplanted) hearts (464), echocardiography demonstrates no mechanical ventricular collapse (465), and syncope can occur in individuals who are supine (265). Characteristic sympathetic manifestations—pallor, sweating, pupillary dilation, and piloerection—reflect the effects of high circulating epinephrine and cannot be explained by sudden SNS failure.

Sympathoadrenal imbalance is a state in which SNS activity, reflected by plasma norepinephrine, fails to keep pace with or declines relative to SAS, reflected by plasma epinephrine (265, 466468). The proximate cause of the syncope may be epinephrine-induced skeletal muscle vasodilation via beta-2 adrenoceptor agonism that is unopposed by SNS activation.

IX.5.3. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Because of the well-known associations between catecholamines and stress, dating back to Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome (469) and the Chrousos/Gold theory of the central stress system (470), several studies have reported on the involvement of peripheral and central catecholaminergic systems, especially noradrenergic systems, in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The literature on catecholamine metabolism in PTSD generally supports augmented central noradrenergic and peripheral sympathoadrenal responsiveness.

Early inpatient and combat-veteran studies reported increased urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine excretion in PTSD (471), although not uniformly (472). One study found that urinary norepinephrine and dopamine, but not epinephrine, correlated with PTSD symptom severity in Vietnam combat veterans (473), while a large community-based epidemiologic study noted higher 24-hour urinary excretion of all three catecholamines in individuals with lifetime PTSD than in trauma-exposed individuals without PTSD or nonexposed controls (474).

Data based on plasma levels have indicated enhanced peripheral catecholaminergic responsiveness in PTSD, while under resting conditions there may be no overall abnormality (475, 476). Vietnam veterans with PTSD have been reported to have augmented plasma epinephrine responses to combat-film stress compared to controls (477) and an approximately 30% rise in plasma norepinephrine to combat-related stimuli, with no such change in comparison veterans (478). In the majority—but not all—combat veterans with PTSD intravenous yohimbine evokes panic, associated with elevated MHPG levels (479).

CSF studies have supported the occurrence of central noradrenergic activation in a manner correlated with symptoms in PTSD (480). Treatment with the alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin has been reported to improve PTSD-related nightmares and global PTSD symptoms (481, 482); however, a large VA cooperative trial was negative for distressing dreams and sleep quality (483).

IX.5.4. Attentional deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Catecholamine transporters are major therapeutic targets in ADHD. Methylphenidate occupies the dopamine transporter at clinically relevant doses and increases extracellular dopamine, providing a mechanistic basis for stimulant efficacy (484). Atomoxetine, a nonstimulant ADHD medication, acts primarily as a selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor and increases extracellular norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex, while sparing striatal dopamine to a greater extent than methylphenidate (485). Randomized clinical trials have shown atomoxetine efficacy in children and adults with ADHD, supporting NET blockade as a clinically effective catecholaminergic strategy distinct from classical stimulant treatment (486488).

IX.5.5. Tardive dyskinesia

VMAT2 is an established therapeutic target in tardive dyskinesia. By inhibiting vesicular monoamine uptake, VMAT2 inhibitors reduce packaging of cytoplasmic monoamines into synaptic vesicles and thereby decrease regulated monoamine release, including dopaminergic transmission in motor circuits. Two selective VMAT2 inhibitors, valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, have shown efficacy in randomized placebo-controlled trials of tardive dyskinesia and are now clinically important examples of targeting vesicular monoamine storage pharmacologically (489491).

IX.6. Lewy body diseases (LBDs)

The prototype of Lewy body diseases (LBDs) is Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although PD classically is attributed to degenerative loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, the proximate neurochemical abnormality underlying its motor manifestations is dopamine depletion within the striatum, particularly the putamen (492). Evidence from imaging, neurochemical, and postmortem studies indicates that the depletion of dopamine in PD in turn reflects not only the loss of nigrostriatal innervation but also functional impairments in surviving dopaminergic terminals such as reduced dopamine synthesis, impaired vesicular storage, and reduced release, together with increased cytosolic dopamine oxidation that contributes to neurotoxicity. Human post-mortem analyses show severe reductions in vesicular dopamine storage capacity in PD compared with controls, consistent with dysfunction in VMAT2-mediated sequestration of dopamine (493). Experimental evidence from animal models demonstrates that reduced vesicular storage of dopamine leads to increased cytosolic dopamine and oxidative stress markers, linking impaired storage with oxidation-related toxicity (494). Additionally, imaging and release studies reveal impairment of dopamine release mechanisms that precede or accompany terminal degeneration in PD models, indicating release dysfunction independent of cell body loss (495). We have referred to functional abnormalities in intact catecholaminergic terminals as the “sick-but-not-dead” phenomenon (496).

VMAT2 function is relevant to catecholamine turnover, because vesicular uptake determines whether newly synthesized or recaptured catecholamines are stored for regulated release or remain in the cytoplasm, where they are vulnerable to spontaneous and enzymatic oxidation. In PD, Borges and colleagues reported impaired platelet dense-granule serotonin storage, uptake, and thrombin-evoked release, suggesting that a systemic secretory-vesicle defect may be detectable outside the nervous system and may have implications for early PD biomarkers as well as pathogenesis (497). In VMAT2-deficient mouse models, reduced vesicular monoamine storage produces marked monoamine depletion and vulnerability to neurodegeneration; notably, VMAT2-low mice show severe loss of striatal dopamine together with cortical and cardiac norepinephrine depletion, supporting the broader concept that impaired vesicular sequestration can affect both central and peripheral catecholaminergic neuronal terminals (493, 498501).

Computational modeling has revealed multiple functional abnormalities in cardiac sympathetic nerves in Lewy body diseases (12) (Figure 11). These include increased vesicular leakage, attenuated vesicular uptake, decreased TH and LAAAD rates, and decreased neuronal reuptake, reflected by a particular catecholamine metabolomic pattern (red Xs in Figure 11). An analogous approach has been applied recently to identify determinants of putamen dopamine deficiency in PD.

Figure 11: Catecholamine metabolic pattern in cardiac sympathetic nerves in Lewy body diseases.

Figure 11:

Numbers in rectangles identify the compounds listed in Table 1. Red X’s indicate abnormal reactions in LBDs. Abbreviations: 3-MT=3-methoxytyramine; ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; AR=aldehyde reductase; DA=dopamine; DBH=Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase; DHPG=3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol; DOPA=3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; DOPAC=3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; LAAAD=L-aromatic-amino-acid decarboxylase; MAO=monoamine oxidase; NE=norepinephrine; TH=tyrosine hydroxylase.

X. SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVES

New discoveries and concepts

Over the past two decades in the field of catecholamine metabolism many new discoveries have been made and concepts introduced. Table 8 lists some of these, along with brief explanations of why they matter.

Table 8:

Discoveries and concepts since 2004

Rank Main discovery/new concept since 2004 Why it matters Relevant References
1 Real-time, high-resolution catecholamine measurements in vivo Makes it possible to relate phasic & tonic catecholamine dynamics to behavior & circuit activity in vivo (7982)
2 From point-to-point neurotransmission to volume/network neuromodulation DA & NE not only transmitters at discrete release sites but also spatially diffuse modulators (444, 445)
3 Transporters & clearance as dynamic regulators of signaling & transmitter conservation DAT, NET, OCTs, low-affinity uptake systems influence extracellular signal spread & duration, transmitter cross-talk, drug effects, conservation of releasable stores (71, 446, 447)
4 Catecholamine metabolomic patterns as biomarkers of intracellular processes Multi-analyte patterns reflect synthesis, vesicular sequestration, leakage, release, reuptake, & metabolism (1, 450)
5 Kinetic & computational modeling of catecholaminergic systems Kinetic/computational models link catecholamine patterns to rates of synthesis, vesicular uptake, leakage, reuptake, & metabolism (450, 451)
6 Catecholaldehyde/autotoxicity concept Catecholaldehydes are potentially pathogenic products linking cytosolic catecholamine metabolism to dysfunctions, alpha-synuclein, & neurodegeneration (27, 452455)
7 Vesicular storage failure as a disease mechanism Vesicular sequestration determines whether catecholamines are safely stored or remain in the cytoplasm, where they are vulnerable to oxidation & autotoxicity (442, 443, 456)
8 Sick-but-not-dead catecholaminergic terminals Functional impairment of surviving catecholaminergic terminals may precede denervation, linking metabolomic patterns, imaging abnormalities, & preclinical disease (443, 456, 457)
9 Lewy body diseases as multi-process catecholaminergic dyshomeostasis PD, PAF, & DLB entail not only cell loss disorders but also disorders of synthesis, storage, leakage, reuptake, & metabolism (448, 450, 451)
10 Catecholamine neuron heterogeneity & circuit-specific function Optogenetics, chemogenetics, tracing, in vivo recording show DA & NE neurons are heterogeneous projection-specific populations with distinct functions (444, 445)
11 DA theory beyond reward prediction error DA signaling encodes not only reward prediction error but also motivation, salience, movement, policy updating, context, & uncertainty (444, 445)
12 Peripheral catecholamines as autocrine/paracrine regulators & mediators of organ cross-talk In addition to neurotransmitters & hormones, autocrine/paracrine catecholamines affect metabolism, inflammation, cardiovascular disease, tumor biology, & gut–brain signaling (1)
13 Improved biochemical & imaging diagnostics LC-MS/MS, plasma metanephrine/methoxytyramine testing, NET-related imaging, cardiac sympathetic imaging enable precision diagnosis & functional phenotyping (382, 386, 448, 517, 518)
14 Stimulus–secretion–synthesis coupling Activity-dependent & cotransmitter-mediated mechanisms maintain stores during stress-level firing /prolonged transmitter mobilization (157, 160, 519).
15 Pharmacological evolution: transporters, VMAT2, receptor/arrestin signaling, & gene therapy DAT/NET-targeted treatment strategies, VMAT2 inhibition for tardive dyskinesia, arrestin-biased signaling concepts, & AAV2-mediated restoration of LAAADC activity (236, 431, 432, 449)
16 Biochemical phenotyping as a bridge to precision physiology Mechanism-based framework connecting molecules, intracellular reactions, cells, circuits, organs, behavior, & disease, supporting rational diagnosis, treatment, & prevention (2, 450)

Since the 2004 review, catecholamine biology has evolved from a relatively linear pathway model—synthesis, vesicular release, receptor activation, reuptake, and metabolism—into a multilevel regulatory science linking molecules, cells, circuits, organs, behavior, and disease. Central catecholamines are now understood not only as neurotransmitters but also as volume/network neuromodulators whose spatial and temporal actions shape arousal, salience, motivation, learning, movement, cognition, and adaptive behavior (502, 503). Real-time measurement methods, including genetically encoded dopamine and norepinephrine sensors, have made it possible to relate phasic and tonic catecholamine dynamics to behavior and circuit activity in vivo (7982). Transporters and low-affinity uptake systems are now viewed not simply as clearance mechanisms but as determinants of signal spread, signal duration, transmitter cross-talk, drug effects, and conservation of releasable stores (71, 504, 505).

In parallel, peripheral catecholamine biology has expanded beyond the classical sympathetic noradrenergic and adrenomedullary systems to include autocrine/paracrine catecholaminergic systems, organ cross-talk, gut–brain interactions, immune/inflammatory modulation, cardiovascular disease, stress cardiomyopathy, and tumor biology. Clinical translation has advanced through refined LC-MS/MS assays, catecholamine-system imaging, and functional phenotyping of autonomic and neurodegenerative disorders (1, 506). Pharmacological advances include transporter-targeting strategies, VMAT2 inhibition, receptor/arrestin signaling concepts, and AAV2-mediated restoration of LAAAD activity in genetic LAAAD deficiency (236, 489, 490, 507).

Catecholamine metabolomic patterns can now be interpreted as biomarkers of intracellular processes, including synthesis, vesicular sequestration, vesicular leakage, release, reuptake, and intra-neuronal metabolism. When coupled with kinetic and computational modeling, these patterns can estimate functional abnormalities that are otherwise inaccessible in humans in vivo (12, 508, 509). These approaches support the concepts of catecholamine autotoxicity, catecholaldehyde-mediated injury, deficient vesicular storage, “sick-but-not-dead” catecholaminergic terminals, and Lewy body diseases as multi-process disorders of catecholamine synthesis, storage, leakage, reuptake, and metabolism rather than denervation alone (1, 28, 493, 500, 501, 506, 510515). Together, these developments provide a framework for mechanism-based biochemical phenotyping and for rational diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive strategies in catecholamine-related disorders.

Conclusions

The advances in understanding of catecholamine metabolism extend well beyond the classical view of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine as simple chemical messengers and their metabolites as expected downstream products. Instead, catecholamine metabolic patterns provide key insights into physiological processes such as biosynthesis, vesicular handling, release, and reuptake.

A key organizing principle is the distinction among three types of peripheral catecholaminergic systems—neurotransmitter, hormonal, and autocrine/paracrine—embedded within an extended autonomic system that incorporates neuroendocrine and immune–inflammatory components. Advances in analytical chemistry now permit comprehensive measurement of catecholamine-related compounds, enabling inferences about specific intracellular processes across physiological states, drug exposures, and pathophysiological states. Conversely, genetic and acquired alterations in activities of these catecholamine systems produce specific clinical syndromes.

From this perspective, catecholamine metabolomic patterns function as biomarkers of intracellular processes. When coupled with quantitative kinetic modeling, these patterns can reveal functional abnormalities such as impaired vesicular sequestration or increased cytosolic oxidation that may not only accompany but precede clinical manifestations of some chronic diseases. Catecholamine metabolomics provides a framework for mechanism-based phenotyping and rationalizing strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Acknowledgement statement (including conflict of interest and funding sources):

Dr. Goldstein retired from federal employment in August, 2025 and now is a Scientist Emeritus. The contribution of the author is in compliance with agency policy requirements and is considered a Work of the United States Government. The findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Goldstein receives royalties from a book published by the Johns Hopkins University Press in 2006; and he is the sole proprietor of The Autonomic and Catecholamine Healthspan Institute, LLC. There are no other potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Eisenhofer G, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. Catecholamine metabolism: a contemporary view with implications for physiology and medicine. Pharmacol Rev 56: 331–349, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goldstein DS. Stress and the “extended” autonomic system. Auton Neurosci 236: 102889, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goldstein DS. The extended autonomic system, dyshomeostasis, and COVID-19. Clin Auton Res 30: 299–315, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benarroch EE. The central autonomic network: functional organization, dysfunction, and perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 68: 988–1001, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benarroch EE. Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Autonomic Nervous System. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 26: 12–24, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sterling P What Is Health?: Allostasis and the Evolution of Human Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schulkin J, and Sterling P. Allostasis: A Brain-Centered, Predictive Mode of Physiological Regulation. Trends Neurosci 42: 740–752, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goldstein DS, and Kopin IJ. Linking stress, catecholamine autotoxicity, and allostatic load with neurodegenerative diseases: A focused review in memory of Richard Kvetnansky. Cell Mol Neurobiol 38: 13–24, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goldstein DS, and Kopin IJ. Homeostatic systems, biocybernetics, and autonomic neuroscience. Auton Neurosci 208: 15–28, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goldstein DS, Lenders JW, Kaler SG, and Eisenhofer G. Catecholamine phenotyping: clues to the diagnosis, treatment, and pathophysiology of neurogenetic disorders. J Neurochem 67: 1781–1790, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eisenhofer G, Friberg P, Rundqvist B, Quyyumi AA, Lambert G, Kaye DM, Kopin IJ, Goldstein DS, and Esler MD. Cardiac sympathetic nerve function in congestive heart failure. Circulation 93: 1667–1676, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goldstein DS, Pekker MJ, Eisenhofer G, and Sharabi Y. Computational modeling reveals multiple abnormalities of myocardial noradrenergic function in Lewy body diseases. JCI Insight 5: e130441, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nagatsu T, Levitt M, and Udenfriend S. Tyrosine Hydroxylase. The Initial Step in Norepinephrine Biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 239: 2910–2917, 1964. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kaufman S Enzymology of the phenylalanine-hydroxylating system. Enzyme 38: 286–295, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carlsson A, Kehr W, and Lindqvist M. The role of intraneuronal amine levels in the feedback control of dopamine, noradrenaline and 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis in rat brain. J Neural Transm 39: 1–19, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oka K, Ashiba G, Kiss B, and Nagatsu T. Short-term effect of stress on tyrosine hydroxylase activity. Neurochem Int 4: 375–382, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weiner N, Lee FL, Dreyer E, and Barnes E. The activation of tyrosine hydroxylase in noradrenergic neurons during acute nerve stimulation. Life Sci 22: 1197–1216, 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Masserano JM, Vaulliet P,R, Tank AW, and Weiner N The role of tyrosine hydroxylase in the regulation of catecholamine synthesis. In: Catecholamines II, edited by Trendelenburg U, and Weiner N New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, p. 427–469. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dunkley PR, and Dickson PW. Tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation in vivo. J Neurochem 149: 706–728, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Albert VR, Allen JM, and Joh TH. A single gene codes for aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase in both neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. JBiolChem 262: 9404–9411, 1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Awapara J, Sandman RP, and Hanly C. Activation of DOPA decarboxylase by pyridoxal phosphate. Arch Biochem Biophys 98: 520–525, 1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kopin IJ. Monoamine oxidase and catecholamine metabolism. J Neural Transm Suppl 41: 57–67, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Collins GG, Sandler M, Williams ED, and Youdim MB. Multiple forms of human brain mitochondrial monoamine oxidase. Nature 225: 817–820, 1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shih JC. Molecular basis of human MAO A and B. Neuropsychopharmacology 4: 1–7, 1991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Uchida E, and Koelle GB. Histochemical investigation of criteria for the distinction between monoamine oxidase A and B in various species. J Histochem Cytochem 32: 667–673, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goldstein DS, Castillo G, Sullivan P, and Sharabi Y. Differential Susceptibilities of Catecholamines to Metabolism by Monoamine Oxidases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 379: 253–259, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goldstein DS. The catecholaldehyde hypothesis: where MAO fits in. J Neural Transm 127: 169–177, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Friedman S, and Kaufman S. 3,4 Dihydroxyphenylethylamine fl-hydroxylase. Physical properities, copper content, and role of copper in catalytic activity. J Biol Chem 240: 4763–4773, 1965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Laduron PM. Evidence for a localization of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase within the chromaffin granules. FEBS Lett 52: 132–134, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Axelrod J Purification and properties of phenylethanolamine-N-methyl transferase. J Biol Chem 237: 1657–1660, 1962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Molinoff PB, and Axelrod J. Biochemistry of catecholamines. Annu Rev Biochem 40: 465–500, 1971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li PP, Warsh JJ, and Godse DD. Metabolic fate of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethyleneglycol (DHPG) in mouse brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 7: 751–754, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marchitti SA, Deitrich RA, and Vasiliou V. Neurotoxicity and metabolism of the catecholamine-derived 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde: the role of aldehyde dehydrogenase. Pharmacol Rev 59: 125–150, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Stull R, Ropchak TG, Keiser HR, and Kopin IJ. Dihydroxyphenylglycol and dihydroxymandelic acid during intravenous infusions of noradrenaline. Clin Sci 73: 123–125, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kawamura M, Eisenhofer G, Kopin IJ, Kador PF, Lee YS, Fujisawa S, and Sato S. Aldose reductase: an aldehyde scavenging enzyme in the intraneuronal metabolism of norepinephrine in human sympathetic ganglia. Auton Neurosci 96: 131–139, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kawamura M, Kopin IJ, Kador PF, Sato S, Tjurmina O, and Eisenhofer G. Effects of aldehyde/aldose reductase inhibition on neuronal metabolism of norepinephrine. J Auton Nerv Syst 66: 145–148, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mardh G Vanillic acid, a metabolite of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylglycol and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxymandelic acid in man. J Neurochem 43: 522–525, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brown RT, Polinsky RJ, and Kopin IJ. Interconversion of O-methylated norepinephrine metabolites in humans. J Lab Clin Med 110: 119–124, 1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Eisenhofer G, Aneman A, Hooper D, Holmes C, Goldstein DS, and Friberg P. Production and metabolism of dopamine and norepinephrine in mesenteric organs and liver of swine. Am J Physiol 268: G641–649, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eisenhofer G, Aneman A, Hooper D, Rundqvist B, and Friberg P. Mesenteric organ production, hepatic metabolism, and renal elimination of norepinephrine and its metabolites in humans. J Neurochem 66: 1565–1573, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Cherup J, and Sharabi Y. Plasma catechols after eating olives. Clin Transl Sci 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wood TC, Aksoy IA, Aksoy S, and Weinshilboum RM. Human liver thermolabile phenol sulfotransferase: cDNA cloning, expression and characterization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 198: 1119–1127, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Salman ED, Kadlubar SA, and Falany CN. Expression and localization of cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 and SULT1A3 in normal human brain. Drug Metab Dispos 37: 706–709, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eisenhofer G, Coughtrie MWH, and Goldstein DS. Dopamine sulfate: An enigma resolved. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 26: S41–S53, 1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goldstein DS, Swoboda KJ, Miles JM, Coppack SW, Aneman A, Holmes C, Lamensdorf I, and Eisenhofer G. Sources and physiological significance of plasma dopamine sulfate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 2523–2531, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yoshizumi M, Ishimura Y, Masuda Y, Ohuchi T, Katoh I, Houchi H, and Oka M. Physiological significance of plasma sulfoconjugated dopamine: experimental and clinical studies. Hypertens Res 18 Suppl 1: S101–106, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kuchel O Increased plasma dopamine in patients presenting with the pseudopheochromocytoma quandary: retrospective analysis of 10 years’ experience. J Hypertens 16: 1531–1537, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kaufman S The Structure of the Phenylalanine-Hydroxylation Cofactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 50: 1085–1093, 1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Axelrod J, and Tomchick R. Enzymatic O-methylation of epinephrine and other catecholamines. JBiolChem 233: 702–705, 1958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Myohanen TT, Schendzielorz N, and Mannisto PT. Distribution of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) proteins and enzymatic activities in wild-type and soluble COMT deficient mice. J Neurochem 113: 1632–1643, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Anderson DW, Schray RC, Duester G, and Schneider JS. Functional significance of aldehyde dehydrogenase ALDH1A1 to the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Brain Res 1408: 81–87, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, Cooney A, Jinsmaa Y, Kopin IJ, and Sharabi Y. Rotenone decreases intracellular aldehyde dehydrogenase activity: implications for the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 133: 14–25, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Landau R, Halperin R, Sullivan P, Zibly Z, Leibowitz A, Goldstein DS, and Sharabi Y. The rat rotenone model reproduces the abnormal pattern of central catecholamine metabolism found in Parkinson’s disease. Dis Model Mech 15: 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van den Berg MP, Almomani R, Biaggioni I, van Faassen M, van der Harst P, Sillje HHW, Mateo Leach I, Hemmelder MH, Navis G, Luijckx GJ, de Brouwer APM, Venselaar H, Verbeek MM, van der Zwaag PA, Jongbloed JDH, van Tintelen JP, Wevers RA, and Kema IP. Mutations in CYB561 Causing a Novel Orthostatic Hypotension Syndrome. Circ Res 122: 846–854, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Douglas WW, and Rubin RP. The role of calcium in the secretory response of the adrenal medulla to acetylcholine. J Physiol 159: 40–57, 1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Neher E, and Marty A. Discrete changes of cell membrane capacitance observed under conditions of enhanced secretion in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79: 6712–6716, 1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Phillips JH, Burridge K, Wilson SP, and Kirshner N. Visualization of the exocytosis/endocytosis secretory cycle in cultured adrenal chromaffin cells. J Cell Biol 97: 1906–1917, 1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhao WD, Hamid E, Shin W, Wen PJ, Krystofiak ES, Villarreal SA, Chiang HC, Kachar B, and Wu LG. Hemi-fused structure mediates and controls fusion and fission in live cells. Nature 534: 548–552, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shin W, Ge L, Arpino G, Villarreal SA, Hamid E, Liu H, Zhao WD, Wen PJ, Chiang HC, and Wu LG. Visualization of Membrane Pore in Live Cells Reveals a Dynamic-Pore Theory Governing Fusion and Endocytosis. Cell 173: 934–945 e912, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Axelrod J, and Kopin IJ. The uptake, storage, release and metabolism of noradrenaline in sympathetic nerves. Prog Brain Res 31: 21–32, 1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Eisenhofer G, Smolich JJ, Cox HS, and Esler MD. Neuronal reuptake of norepinephrine and production of dihydroxyphenylglycol by cardiac sympathetic nerves in the anesthetized dog. Circulation 84: 1354–1363, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, and Kopin IJ. Plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol for estimation of noradrenaline neuronal reuptake in the sympathetic nervous system in vivo. Clin Sci 76: 171–182, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Giros B, el Mestikawy S, Bertrand L, and Caron MG. Cloning and functional characterization of a cocaine-sensitive dopamine transporter. FEBS Lett 295: 149–154, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kilty JE, Lorang D, and Amara SG. Cloning and expression of a cocaine-sensitive rat dopamine transporter. Science 254: 578–579, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pacholczyk T, Blakely RD, and Amara SG. Expression cloning of a cocaine- and antidepressant-sensitive human noradrenaline transporter. Nature 350: 350–354, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Eisenhofer G The role of neuronal and extraneuronal plasma membrane transporters in the inactivation of peripheral catecholamines. Pharmacol Ther 91: 35–62, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Giros B, Jaber M, Jones SR, Wightman RM, and Caron MG. Hyperlocomotion and indifference to cocaine and amphetamine in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. Nature 379: 606–612, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jones SR, Gainetdinov RR, Jaber M, Giros B, Wightman RM, and Caron MG. Profound neuronal plasticity in response to inactivation of the dopamine transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 4029–4034, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jones SR, Gainetdinov RR, Wightman RM, and Caron MG. Mechanisms of amphetamine action revealed in mice lacking the dopamine transporter. J Neurosci 18: 1979–1986, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Keller NR, Diedrich A, Appalsamy M, Tuntrakool S, Lonce S, Finney C, Caron MG, and Robertson D. Norepinephrine transporter-deficient mice exhibit excessive tachycardia and elevated blood pressure with wakefulness and activity. Circulation 110: 1191–1196, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Esler MD, Wallin G, Dorward PK, Eisenhofer G, Westerman R, Meredith I, Lambert G, Cox HS, and Jennings G. Effects of desipramine on sympathetic nerve firing and norepinephrine spillover to plasma in humans. Am J Physiol 260: R817–823, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Huangfu D, Goodwin WB, and Guyenet PG. Sympatholytic effect of tricyclic antidepressants: site and mechanism of action in anesthetized rats. Am J Physiol 268: R1429–1441, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bennett MR. Transmission at Sympathetic Varicosities. News Physiol Sci 13: 79–84, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fuxe K, Dahlstrom AB, Jonsson G, Marcellino D, Guescini M, Dam M, Manger P, and Agnati L. The discovery of central monoamine neurons gave volume transmission to the wired brain. Prog Neurobiol 90: 82–100, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Borroto-Escuela DO, Gonzalez-Cristo E, Ochoa-Torres V, Serra-Rojas EM, Ambrogini P, Arroyo-Garcia LE, and Fuxe K. Understanding electrical and chemical transmission in the brain. Front Cell Neurosci 18: 1398862, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ozcete OD, Banerjee A, and Kaeser PS. Mechanisms of neuromodulatory volume transmission. Mol Psychiatry 29: 3680–3693, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Toyoda H, Won J, Kim W, Kim H, Davy O, Saito M, Kim D, Tanaka T, Kang Y, and Oh SB. The Nature of Noradrenergic Volume Transmission From Locus Coeruleus to Brainstem Mesencephalic Trigeminal Sensory Neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 16: 841239, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Patriarchi T, Cho JR, Merten K, Howe MW, Marley A, Xiong WH, Folk RW, Broussard GJ, Liang R, Jang MJ, Zhong H, Dombeck D, von Zastrow M, Nimmerjahn A, Gradinaru V, Williams JT, and Tian L. Ultrafast neuronal imaging of dopamine dynamics with designed genetically encoded sensors. Science 360: 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sun F, Zhou J, Dai B, Qian T, Zeng J, Li X, Zhuo Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Qian C, Tan K, Feng J, Dong H, Lin D, Cui G, and Li Y. Next-generation GRAB sensors for monitoring dopaminergic activity in vivo. Nat Methods 17: 1156–1166, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Feng J, Zhang C, Lischinsky JE, Jing M, Zhou J, Wang H, Zhang Y, Dong A, Wu Z, Wu H, Chen W, Zhang P, Zou J, Hires SA, Zhu JJ, Cui G, Lin D, Du J, and Li Y. A Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Sensor for Rapid and Specific In Vivo Detection of Norepinephrine. Neuron 102: 745–761 e748, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Feng J, Dong H, Lischinsky JE, Zhou J, Deng F, Zhuang C, Miao X, Wang H, Li G, Cai R, Xie H, Cui G, Lin D, and Li Y. Monitoring norepinephrine release in vivo using next-generation GRAB(NE) sensors. Neuron 112: 1930–1942 e1936, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lenders JW, Kvetnansky R, Pacak K, Goldstein DS, Kopin IJ, and Eisenhofer G. Extraneuronal metabolism of endogenous and exogenous norepinephrine and epinephrine in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 266: 288–293, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Eisenhofer G, Rundqvist B, Aneman A, Friberg P, Dakak N, Kopin IJ, Jacobs MC, and Lenders JW. Regional release and removal of catecholamines and extraneuronal metabolism to metanephrines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 3009–3017, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Eisenhofer G Plasma normetanephrine for examination of extraneuronal uptake and metabolism of noradrenaline in rats. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 349: 259–269, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kopin IJ, Zukowska-Grojec Z, Bayorh MA, and Goldstein DS. Estimation of intrasynaptic norepinephrine concentrations at vascular neuroeffector junctions in vivo. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 325: 298–305, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Goldstein DS, Zimlichman R, Stull R, Keiser HR, and Kopin IJ. Estimation of intrasynaptic norepinephrine concentrations in humans. Hypertension 8: 471–475, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kopin IJ, Rundqvist B, Friberg P, Lenders J, Goldstein DS, and Eisenhofer G. Different relationships of spillover to release of norepinephrine in human heart, kidneys, and forearm. Am J Physiol 275: R165–R173, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dehal P, and Boore JL. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol 3: e314, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cardinaud B, Sugamori KS, Coudouel S, Vincent JD, Niznik HB, and Vernier P. Early emergence of three dopamine D1 receptor subtypes in vertebrates. Molecular phylogenetic, pharmacological, and functional criteria defining D1A, D1B, and D1C receptors in European eel Anguilla anguilla. J Biol Chem 272: 2778–2787, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ruuskanen JO, Xhaard H, Marjamaki A, Salaneck E, Salminen T, Yan YL, Postlethwait JH, Johnson MS, Larhammar D, and Scheinin M. Identification of duplicated fourth alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype by cloning and mapping of five receptor genes in zebrafish. Mol Biol Evol 21: 14–28, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zavala K, Vandewege MW, Hoffmann FG, and Opazo JC. Evolution of the beta-adrenoreceptors in vertebrates. Gen Comp Endocrinol 240: 129–137, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chang PC, Grossman E, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. On the existence of functional beta-adrenoceptors on vascular sympathetic nerve endings in the human forearm. J Hypertens 12: 681–690, 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Goldstein DS, Levinson PD, Zimlichman R, Pitterman A, Stull R, and Keiser HR. Clonidine suppression testing in essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 102: 42–49, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Collins S beta-Adrenergic Receptors and Adipose Tissue Metabolism: Evolution of an Old Story. Annu Rev Physiol 84: 1–16, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hennenberg M, and Michel MC. Adrenoceptors in the Lower Urinary Tract. Handb Exp Pharmacol 285: 333–367, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Portella AK, Papantoni A, Joseph AT, Chen L, Lee RS, Silveira PP, Dube L, and Carnell S. Genetically-predicted prefrontal DRD4 gene expression modulates differentiated brain responses to food cues in adolescent girls and boys. Sci Rep 11: 24094, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Langer SZ, Massingham R, and Shepperson NB. Presence of post-synaptic alpha 2-adrenoceptors of predominantly extrasynaptic location in the vascular smooth muscle of the dog hind-limb. ClinSci 59: 225s–228s, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wilffert B, Timmermans PBMWM, and van Zwieten PA. Extrasynaptic location of alpha-2 and noninnvervated beta-2 adrenoceptors in the vascular system of the pithed normotensive rat. JPharmacolExpTher 221: 762–768, 1982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tjurmina OA, Goldstein DS, Palkovits M, and Kopin IJ. a2-adrenoceptor-mediated restraint of norepinephrine synthesis, release, and turnover during immobilization in rats. Brain Res 826: 243–252, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Aggarwal A, Esler MD, Socratous F, and Kaye DM. Evidence for functional presynaptic alpha-2 adrenoceptors and their down-regulation in human heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 1246–1251, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Leenen FH, Davies RA, and Fourney A. Role of cardiac beta 2-receptors in cardiac responses to exercise in cardiac transplant patients. Circulation 91: 685–690, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ishii H, Niioka T, and Izumi H. Circulating adrenaline released by sympathoadrenal activation elicits acute vasodilatation in the rat masseter muscle. Arch Oral Biol 54: 486–494, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Langer SZ. alpha2-Adrenoceptors in the treatment of major neuropsychiatric disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36: 196–202, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Langer SZ, and Lehmann J. Presynaptic receptors on catecholamine neurones. In: Catecholamines II, edited by Trendelenburg U, and Weiner N. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, p. 419–507. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Muscholl E Peripheral muscarinic control of norepinephrine release in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol 239: H713–H720, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lefkowitz RJ, Pitcher J, Krueger K, and Daaka Y. Mechanisms of b-adrenergic receptor desensitization and resensitization. In: Catecholamines: Bridging Basic Science with Clinical Medicine, edited by Goldstein DS, Eisenhofer G, and McCarty R New York: Academic Press, 1998, p. 416–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lohse MJ, Engelhardt S, Danner S, and Bohm M. Mechanisms of beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization: from molecular biology to heart failure. Basic Res Cardiol 91 Suppl 2: 29–34, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lefkowitz RJ. A brief history of G-protein coupled receptors (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52: 6366–6378, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lefkowitz RJ, Pitcher J, Krueger K, and Daaka Y. Mechanisms of beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization and resensitization. Adv Pharmacol 42: 416–420, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Komolov KE, and Benovic JL. G protein-coupled receptor kinases: Past, present and future. Cell Signal 41: 17–24, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Luttrell LM, Ferguson SS, Daaka Y, Miller WE, Maudsley S, Della Rocca GJ, Lin F, Kawakatsu H, Owada K, Luttrell DK, Caron MG, and Lefkowitz RJ. Beta-arrestin-dependent formation of beta2 adrenergic receptor-Src protein kinase complexes. Science 283: 655–661, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Tohgo A, Pierce KL, Choy EW, Lefkowitz RJ, and Luttrell LM. beta-Arrestin scaffolding of the ERK cascade enhances cytosolic ERK activity but inhibits ERK-mediated transcription following angiotensin AT1a receptor stimulation. J Biol Chem 277: 9429–9436, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Trendelenburg U Supersensitivity and subsensitivity to sympathomimetic amines. Pharmacol Rev 15: 225–276, 1963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Trendelenburg U Mechanisms of supersensitivity and subsensitivity to sympathomimetic amines. Pharmacol Rev 18: 629–640, 1966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Burnstock G Do some nerve cells release more than one transmitter? Neuroscience 1: 239–248, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Burnstock G Purinergic neurotransmission. In: Primer on the Autonomic Nervous System, edited by Robertson D, Low PA, and Polinsky RJ. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1996, p. 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Burnstock G Cotransmission in the autonomic nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol 117: 23–35, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Burnstock G Purinergic cotransmission. Exp Physiol 94: 20–24, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.O’Connor DT, and Bernstein KN. Human chromogranin A, the major catecholamine storage vesicle soluble protein: purification from catecholamine storage vesicles of pheochromocytoma, quantitation by RIA, and evaluation of plasma chromogranin A as an index of exocytotic sympathoadrenal activity in normal and hypertensive man. Hypertension 6: 787, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rao F, Wen G, Gayen JR, Das M, Vaingankar SM, Rana BK, Mahata M, Kennedy BP, Salem RM, Stridsberg M, Abel K, Smith DW, Eskin E, Schork NJ, Hamilton BA, Ziegler MG, Mahata SK, and O’Connor DT. Catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide catestatin (chromogranin A(352-372)): naturally occurring amino acid variant Gly364Ser causes profound changes in human autonomic activity and alters risk for hypertension. Circulation 115: 2271–2281, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Livett BG, Dean DM, Whelan LG, Udenfriend S, and Rossier J. Co-release of enkephalin and catecholamines from cultured adrenal chromaffin cells. Nature 289: 317–319, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Podvin S, Bundey R, Toneff T, Ziegler M, and Hook V. Profiles of secreted neuropeptides and catecholamines illustrate similarities and differences in response to stimulation by distinct secretagogues. Mol Cell Neurosci 68: 177–185, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hokfelt T, Lundberg JM, Tatemoto K, Mutt V, Terenius L, Polak J, Bloom S, Sasek C, Elde R, and Goldstein M. Neuropeptide Y (NPY)- and FMRFamide neuropeptide-like immunoreactivities in catecholamine neurons of the rat medulla oblongata. Acta Physiol Scand 117: 315–318, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dutton MA, Lee EW, and Zukowska Z. NPY and extreme stress: lessons learned from posttraumatic stress disorder. EXS 213–222, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Hirsch D, and Zukowska Z. NPY and stress 30 years later: the peripheral view. Cell Mol Neurobiol 32: 645–659, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Dean DM, Lemaire S, and Livett BG. Evidence that inhibition of nicotine-mediated catecholamine secretion from adrenal chromaffin cells by enkephalin, beta-endorphin, dynorphin (1-13), and opiates is not mediated via specific opiate receptors. J Neurochem 38: 606–614, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Eisenhofer G, Aneman A, Friberg P, Hooper D, Fandriks L, Lonroth H, Hunyady B, and Mezey E. Substantial production of dopamine in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 3864–3871, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Mezey E, Eisenhofer G, Harta G, Hansson S, Gould L, Hunyady B, and Hoffman BJ. A novel nonneuronal catecholaminergic system: exocrine pancreas synthesizes and releases dopamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 10377–10382, 1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Goldstein. Peripheral catecholamine systems: An evolutionary perspective. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zimlichman R, Levinson PD, Kelly G, Stull R, Keiser HR, and Goldstein DS. Derivation of urinary dopamine from plasma dopa. Clin Sci (Lond) 75: 515–520, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wolfovitz E, Grossman E, Folio CJ, Keiser HR, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. Derivation of urinary dopamine from plasma dihydroxyphenylalanine in humans. Clin Sci 84: 549–557, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Goldstein DS, Stull R, Eisenhofer G, and Gill JR Jr. Urinary excretion of dihydroxyphenylalanine and dopamine during alterations of dietary salt intake in humans. Clin Sci 76: 517–522, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ball SG, and Lee MR. The effect of carbidopa administration on urinary sodium excretion in man. Is dopamine an intrarenal natriuretic hormone? Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 115–119, 1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Gill JR Jr., Grossman E, and Goldstein DS. High urinary dopa and low urinary dopamine-to-dopa ratio in salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension 18: 614–621, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Barbu AC, Stoleru S, Zugravu A, Poenaru E, Dragomir A, Costescu M, Aurelian SM, Shhab Y, Stoleru CM, Coman OA, and Fulga I. Dopamine and the Gut Microbiota: Interactions Within the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis and Therapeutic Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 27: 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Asano Y, Hiramoto T, Nishino R, Aiba Y, Kimura T, Yoshihara K, Koga Y, and Sudo N. Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303: G1288–1295, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Feng XY, Yan JT, Li GW, Liu JH, Fan RF, Li SC, Zheng LF, Zhang Y, and Zhu JX. Source of dopamine in gastric juice and luminal dopamine-induced duodenal bicarbonate secretion via apical dopamine D(2) receptors. Br J Pharmacol 177: 3258–3272, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Onimus O, Arrivet F, Le Borgne T, Perez S, Castel J, Ansoult A, Bertrand B, Mashhour N, de Almeida C, Bui LC, Vandecasteele M, Luquet S, Venance L, Heck N, Marti F, and Gangarossa G. The gut-brain vagal axis governs mesolimbic dopamine dynamics and reward events. Sci Adv 12: eadz0828, 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Menozzi E, Ren Y, Geiger M, Macnaughtan J, Avenali M, Toffoli M, Gilles M, Calabrese R, Mitrotti P, Gallo L, Famechon A, Del Pozo SL, Mezabrovschi R, Koletsi S, Loefflad N, Yalkic S, Limbachiya N, Clasen F, Yildirim S, Shoaie S, Blottiere H, Morabito C, David A, Quinquis B, Pons N, Le Chatelier E, Valzania F, Cavallieri F, Fioravanti V, Toschi G, Blandini F, Almeida M, Ehrlich SD, Meslier V, and Schapira AHV. Microbiome signature of Parkinson’s disease in healthy and genetically at-risk individuals. Nat Med 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Boscaini S, Bastiaanssen TFS, Moloney GM, Bergamo F, Zeraik L, O’eary C, Ferri A, Irfan M, van der Rhee M, Lindemann TIF, Schneider E, Meyyappan AC, Harold KB, Long-Smith CM, Carbia C, O’Riordan KJ, de Alvarenga JFR, Tosi N, Del Rio D, Rosi A, Bresciani L, Mena P, Clarke G, and Cryan JF. Habitual coffee intake shapes the gut microbiome and modifies host physiology and cognition. Nat Commun 17: 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Szelenyi J, and Vizi ES. The catecholamine cytokine balance: interaction between the brain and the immune system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1113: 311–324, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Porte D Jr., Graber AL, Kuzuya T, and Williams RH. The effect of epinephrine on immunoreactive insulin levels in man. J Clin Invest 45: 228–236, 1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Halter JB, Beard JC, and Porte D Jr. Islet function and stress hyperglycemia: plasma glucose and epinephrine interaction. Am J Physiol 247: E47–52, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Cannon WB, and de la Paz D. Emotional stimulation of adrenal gland secretion. Am J Physiol 28: 64–70, 1911. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Rao Y The First Hormone: Adrenaline. Trends Endocrinol Metab 30: 331–334, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Kvetnansky R, Sun CL, Lake CR, Thoa N, Torda T, and Kopin IJ. Effect of handling and forced immobilization on rat plasma levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase. Endocrinology 103: 1868–1874, 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Goldstein DS, Breier A, Wolkowitz OM, Pickar D, and Lenders JW. Plasma levels of catecholamines and corticotrophin during acute glucopenia induced by 2-deoxy-D-glucose in normal man. Clin Auton Res 2: 359–366, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Goldstein DS. Concepts of scientific integrative medicine applied to the physiology and pathophysiology of catecholamine systems. Compr Physiol 3: 1569–1610, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Goldstein DS, and Kopin IJ. Adrenomedullary, adrenocortical, and sympathoneural responses to stressors: A meta-analysis. Endo Regul 42: 111–119, 2008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Stull RW, Gold PW, Keiser HR, and Kopin IJ. Dissociation between corticotrophin and catecholamine responses to isoprenaline in humans. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 14: 337–341, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Weinberger MH, Aoi W, and Henry DP. Direct effect of beta-adrenergic stimulation on renin release by the rat kidney slice in vitro. Circ Res 37: 318–324, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Ferrario CM. The renin-angiotensin system: importance in physiology and pathology. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 15 Suppl 3: S1–5, 1990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Chang PC, Grossman E, Kopin IJ, Goldstein DS, Folio CJ, and Holmes C. On the existence of functional angiotensin II receptors on vascular sympathetic nerve terminals in the human forearm. J Hypertens 13: 1275–1284, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Udelsman R, Norton JA, Jelenich SE, Goldstein DS, Linehan WM, Loriaux DL, and Chrousos GP. Responses of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and renin-angiotensin axes and the sympathetic system during controlled surgical and anesthetic stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64: 986–994, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Hamelink C, Tjurmina O, Damadzic R, Young WS, Weihe E, Lee HW, and Eiden LE. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide is a sympathoadrenal neurotransmitter involved in catecholamine regulation and glucohomeostasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 461–466, 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Eiden LE, Emery AC, Zhang L, and Smith CB. PACAP signaling in stress: insights from the chromaffin cell. Pflugers Arch 470: 79–88, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Alamo L, Garcia AG, and Borges R. Electrically-evoked catecholamine release from cat adrenals. Role of cholinergic receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 42: 973–978, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Kuri BA, Chan SA, and Smith CB. PACAP regulates immediate catecholamine release from adrenal chromaffin cells in an activity-dependent manner through a protein kinase C-dependent pathway. J Neurochem 110: 1214–1225, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Stroth N, Kuri BA, Mustafa T, Chan SA, Smith CB, and Eiden LE. PACAP controls adrenomedullary catecholamine secretion and expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes at high splanchnic nerve firing rates characteristic of stress transduction in male mice. Endocrinology 154: 330–339, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Tonshoff C, Hemmick L, and Evinger MJ. Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) regulates expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzyme genes in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. J Mol Neurosci 9: 127–140, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Bobrovskaya L, Gelain DP, Gilligan C, Dickson PW, and Dunkley PR. PACAP stimulates the sustained phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase at serine 40. Cell Signal 19: 1141–1149, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Tracey KJ. The inflammatory reflex. Nature 420: 853–859, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Rosas-Ballina M, Ochani M, Parrish WR, Ochani K, Harris YT, Huston JM, Chavan S, and Tracey KJ. Splenic nerve is required for cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway control of TNF in endotoxemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 11008–11013, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Wang H, Yu M, Ochani M, Amella CA, Tanovic M, Susarla S, Li JH, Wang H, Yang H, Ulloa L, Al-Abed Y, Czura CJ, and Tracey KJ. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation. Nature 421: 384–388, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Saku K, Kishi T, Sakamoto K, Hosokawa K, Sakamoto T, Murayama Y, Kakino T, Ikeda M, Ide T, and Sunagawa K. Afferent vagal nerve stimulation resets baroreflex neural arc and inhibits sympathetic nerve activity. Physiol Rep 2: 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Agac D, Estrada LD, Maples R, Hooper LV, and Farrar JD. The beta2-adrenergic receptor controls inflammation by driving rapid IL-10 secretion. Brain Behav Immun 74: 176–185, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Gader AM, and Cash JD. The effect of adrenaline, noradrenaline, isoprenaline and salbutamol on the resting levels of white blood cells in man. Scand J Haematol 14: 5–10, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Burns AM, Keogan M, Donaldson M, Brown DL, and Park GR. Effects of inotropes on human leucocyte numbers, neutrophil function and lymphocyte subtypes. Br J Anaesth 78: 530–535, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Parazzoli C, Prete A, Favero V, Aresta C, Pucino V, Ayuk J, Asia M, Elhassan YS, Chiodini I, and Ronchi CL. Inflammation-based Scores in Patients With Pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 110: e630–e640, 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Wang K, Wu M, Xu J, Wu C, Zhang B, Wang G, and Ma D. Effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative stress, inflammation, and immune function: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 123: 777–794, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Elenkov IJ, Wilder RL, Chrousos GP, and Vizi ES. The sympathetic nerve--an integrative interface between two supersystems: the brain and the immune system. Pharmacol Rev 52: 595–638, 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Sternberg EM, Chrousos GP, Wilder RL, and Gold PW. The stress response and the regulation of inflammatory disease. Ann Intern Med 117: 854–866, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Ferrari M, Cosentino M, Marino F, Bombelli R, Rasini E, Lecchini S, and Frigo G. Dopaminergic D1-like receptor-dependent inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA expression and catecholamine production in human lymphocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 67: 865–873, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Gerfen CR, Herkenham M, and Thibault J. The neostriatal mosaic: II. Patch- and matrix-directed mesostriatal dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic systems. J Neurosci 7: 3915–3934, 1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Matsuda W, Furuta T, Nakamura KC, Hioki H, Fujiyama F, Arai R, and Kaneko T. Single nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons form widely spread and highly dense axonal arborizations in the neostriatum. J Neurosci 29: 444–453, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Horvitz JC. Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events. Neuroscience 96: 651–656, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Finlay JM, Zigmond MJ, and Abercrombie ED. Increased dopamine and norepinephrine release in medial prefrontal cortex induced by acute and chronic stress: effects of diazepam. Neuroscience 64: 619–628, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Feenstra MG. Dopamine and noradrenaline release in the prefrontal cortex in relation to unconditioned and conditioned stress and reward. Prog Brain Res 126: 133–163, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Weitemier AZ, and McHugh TJ. Noradrenergic modulation of evoked dopamine release and pH shift in the mouse dorsal hippocampus and ventral striatum. Brain Res 1657: 74–86, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Ugrumov M, Taxi J, Pronina T, Kurina A, Sorokin A, Sapronova A, and Calas A. Neurons expressing individual enzymes of dopamine synthesis in the mediobasal hypothalamus of adult rats: functional significance and topographic interrelations. Neuroscience 277: 45–54, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Weihe E, Depboylu C, Schutz B, Schafer MK, and Eiden LE. Three types of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive CNS neurons distinguished by dopa decarboxylase and VMAT2 co-expression. Cell Mol Neurobiol 26: 659–678, 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Lazaridis I, Crittenden JR, Ahn G, Hirokane K, Wickersham IR, Yoshida T, Mahar A, Skara V, Loftus JH, Parvataneni K, Meletis K, Ting JT, Hueske E, Matsushima A, and Graybiel AM. Striosomes control dopamine via dual pathways paralleling canonical basal ganglia circuits. Curr Biol 34: 5263–5283 e5268, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Schultz W Reward prediction error. Curr Biol 27: R369–R371, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Yan G, Amita H, Nonomura S, Inoue KI, Schultz W, and Takada M. Fluorescence detection of dopamine signaling to the primate striatum in relation to stimulus-reward associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 122: e2426861122, 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Cohen JD, and Blum KI. Reward and decision. Neuron 36: 193–198, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Ben-Jonathan N, and Hnasko R. Dopamine as a prolactin (PRL) inhibitor. Endocr Rev 22: 724–763, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Samuels ER, and Szabadi E. Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus: its roles in the regulation of arousal and autonomic function part I: principles of functional organisation. Curr Neuropharmacol 6: 235–253, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Aston-Jones G, and Cohen JD. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 403–450, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Breton-Provencher V, and Sur M. Active control of arousal by a locus coeruleus GABAergic circuit. Nat Neurosci 22: 218–228, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Granata AR, Ruggiero DA, Park DH, Joh TH, and Reis DJ. Brain stem area with C1 epinephrine neurons mediates baroreflex vasodepressor responses. The American journal of physiology 248: H547–567, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Strack AM, Sawyer WB, Hughes JH, Platt KB, and Loewy AD. A general pattern of CNS innervation of the sympathetic outflow demonstrated by transneuronal pseudorabies viral infections. Brain Res 491: 156–162, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Schramm LP, Strack AM, Platt KB, and Loewy AD. Peripheral and central pathways regulating the kidney: a study using pseudorabies virus. Brain Res 616: 251–262, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Strack AM, Sawyer WB, Platt KB, and Loewy AD. CNS cell groups regulating the sympathetic outflow to adrenal gland as revealed by transneuronal cell body labeling with pseudorabies virus. Brain Res 491: 274–296, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Ranjbar-Slamloo Y, and Fazlali Z. Dopamine and Noradrenaline in the Brain; Overlapping or Dissociate Functions? Front Mol Neurosci 12: 334, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Kempadoo KA, Mosharov EV, Choi SJ, Sulzer D, and Kandel ER. Dopamine release from the locus coeruleus to the dorsal hippocampus promotes spatial learning and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: 14835–14840, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Yamasaki M, and Takeuchi T. Locus Coeruleus and Dopamine-Dependent Memory Consolidation. Neural Plast 2017: 8602690, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Takeuchi T, Duszkiewicz AJ, Sonneborn A, Spooner PA, Yamasaki M, Watanabe M, Smith CC, Fernandez G, Deisseroth K, Greene RW, and Morris RG. Locus coeruleus and dopaminergic consolidation of everyday memory. Nature 537: 357–362, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Weil-Malherbe H, Axelrod J, and Tomchick R. Blood-brain barrier for adrenaline. Science 129: 1226–1227, 1959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Whitby LG, Axelrod J, and Weil-Malherbe H. The fate of H3-norepinephrine in animals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 132: 193–201, 1961. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Kageyama T, Nakamura M, Matsuo A, Yamasaki Y, Takakura Y, Hashida M, Kanai Y, Naito M, Tsuruo T, Minato N, and Shimohama S. The 4F2hc/LAT1 complex transports L-DOPA across the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 879: 115–121, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Broadwell RD, Charlton HM, Ganong WF, Salcman M, and Sofroniew M. Allografts of CNS tissue possess a blood-brain barrier. I. Grafts of medial preoptic area in hypogonadal mice. Exp Neurol 105: 135–151, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Esler MD, Jennings GL, and Lambert GW. Release of noradrenaline into the cerebrovascular circulation in patients with primary hypertension. J Hypertens Suppl 6: S494–496, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Ferrier C, Jennings GL, Eisenhofer G, Lambert G, Cox HS, Kalff V, Kelly M, and Esler MD. Evidence for increased noradrenaline release from subcortical brain regions in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 11: 1217–1227, 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Ziegler MG, Lake CR, Wood JH, Brooks BR, and Ebert MH. Relationship between norepinephrine in blood and cerebrospinal fluid in the presence of a blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier for norepinephrine. Journal of Neurochemistry 28: 677–679, 1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Ziegler MG, Milano AJ, and Lake CR. Increased cerebrospinal fluid norepinephrine in essential hypertension. ClinExpHyper 4: 663–674, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Lambert GW, Eisenhofer G, Cox HS, Horne M, Kalff V, Kelly M, Jennings GL, and Esler MD. Direct determination of homovanillic acid release from the human brain, an indicator of central dopaminergic activity. Life Sci 49: 1061–1072, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Hayashi M, Yamaji Y, Kitajima W, and Saruta T. Effects of high salt intake on dopamine production in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 260: E675–679, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Ferreira A, Bettencourt P, Pestana M, Correia F, Serrao P, Martins L, Cerqueira-Gomes M, and Soares-Da-Silva P. Heart failure, aging, and renal synthesis of dopamine. Am J Kidney Dis 38: 502–509, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Goldstein DS. Differential responses of components of the autonomic nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol 117: 13–22, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Pacak K, Baffi JS, Kvetnansky R, Goldstein DS, and Palkovits M. Stressor-specific activation of catecholaminergic systems: implications for stress-related hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical responses. Adv Pharmacol 42: 561–564, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Selye H Stress without Distress. New York: New American Library, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Pacak K, Palkovits M, Yadid G, Kvetnansky R, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. Heterogeneous neurochemical responses to different stressors: A test of Selye’s doctrine of nonspecificity. Am J Physiol 275: R1247–R1255, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Mine M, Mizuguchi H, and Takayanagi T. Kinetic analyses of two-steps oxidation from l-tyrosine to l-dopaquinone with tyrosinase by capillary electrophoresis/dynamic frontal analysis. Anal Biochem 655: 114856, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Eisenhofer G, Tian H, Holmes C, Matsunaga J, Roffler-Tarlov S, and Hearing VJ. Tyrosinase: a developmentally specific major determinant of peripheral dopamine. FASEB J 17: 1248–1255, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Goldstein DS, Grossman E, Armando I, Wolfovitz E, Folio CJ, Holmes C, and Keiser HR. Correlates of urinary excretion of catechols in humans. Biogenic Amines 10: 3–17, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Garty M, Stull R, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. Skin color, aging, and plasma L-dopa levels. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System 26: 261–263, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Esler M, Skews H, Leonard P, Jackman G, Bobik A, and Korner P. Age-dependence of noradrenaline kinetics in normal subjects. Clin Sci (Lond) 60: 217–219, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Esler MD, Turner AG, Kaye DM, Thompson JM, Kingwell BA, Morris M, Lambert GW, Jennings GL, Cox HS, and Seals DR. Aging effects on human sympathetic neuronal function. Am J Physiol 268: R278–R285, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Seals DR, and Esler MD. Human ageing and the sympathoadrenal system. J Physiol 528: 407–417., 2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Morrow LA, Linares OA, Hill TJ, Sanfield JA, Supiano MA, Rosen SG, and Halter JB. Age differences in the plasma clearance mechanisms for epinephrine and norepinephrine in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65: 508–511, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Marker JC, Clutter WE, and Cryer PE. Reduced epinephrine clearance and glycemic sensitivity to epinephrine in older individuals. Am J Physiol 275: E770–776, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Davidson L, Vandongen R, Rouse IL, Beilin LJ, and Tunney A. Sex-related differences in resting and stimulated plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline. Clin Sci (Lond) 67: 347–352, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Gonzalez-Trapaga JL, Nelesen RA, Dimsdale JE, Mills PJ, Kennedy B, Parmer RJ, and Ziegler MG. Plasma epinephrine levels in hypertension and across gender and ethnicity. Life Sci 66: 2383–2392, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Ng AV, Callister R, Johnson DG, and Seals DR. Age and gender influence muscle sympathetic nerve activity at rest in healthy humans. Hypertension 21: 498–503, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Goldstein DS, Levinson P, and Keiser HR. Plasma and urinary catecholamines during the human ovulatory cycle. AmJ ObstetGynecol 146: 824–829, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Eisenhofer G, Lattke P, Herberg M, Siegert G, Qin N, Darr R, Hoyer J, Villringer A, Prejbisz A, Januszewicz A, Remaley A, Martucci V, Pacak K, Ross HA, Sweep FC, and Lenders JW. Reference intervals for plasma free metanephrines with an age adjustment for normetanephrine for optimized laboratory testing of phaeochromocytoma. Ann Clin Biochem 50: 62–69, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Langley JN. The Autonomic Nervous System. Cambridge, England: W. Heffer and Sons, Ltd., 1921. [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Damasio A Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books, Inc., 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Goldstein DS, and McEwen B. Allostasis, homeostats, and the nature of stress. Stress 5: 55–58, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Kaler SG, Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Salerno JA, and Gahl WA. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid neurochemical pattern in Menkes disease. Ann Neurol 33: 171–175, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Goldstein DS, Holmes CS, and Kaler SG. Relative efficiencies of plasma catechol levels and ratios for neonatal diagnosis of Menkes disease. Neurochem Res 34: 1464–1468, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Shibao CA, Garland EM, Black BK, Mathias CJ, Grant MB, Root AW, Robertson D, and Biaggioni I. Congenital absence of norepinephrine due to CYB561 mutations. Neurology 94: e200–e204, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Hyland K, Surtees RA, Rodeck C, and Clayton PT. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency: clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of a new inborn error of neurotransmitter amine synthesis. Neurology 42: 1980–1988, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Swoboda KJ, Hyland K, Goldstein DS, Kuban KC, Arnold LA, Holmes CS, and Levy HL. Clinical and therapeutic observations in aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency. Neurology 53: 1205–1211, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Chien YH, Lee NC, Tseng SH, Tai CH, Muramatsu SI, Byrne BJ, and Hwu WL. Efficacy and safety of AAV2 gene therapy in children with aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency: an open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 1: 265–273, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Tai CH, Lee NC, Chien YH, Byrne BJ, Muramatsu SI, Tseng SH, and Hwu WL. Long-term efficacy and safety of eladocagene exuparvovec in patients with AADC deficiency. Mol Ther 30: 509–518, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Ziegler MG, Milic M, Sun P, Tang CM, Elayan H, Bao X, Cheung WW, and O’Connor DT. Endogenous epinephrine protects against obesity induced insulin resistance. Auton Neurosci 162: 32–34, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Merke DP, Chrousos GP, Eisenhofer G, Weise M, Keil MF, Rogol AD, Van Wyk JJ, and Bornstein SR. Adrenomedullary dysplasia and hypofunction in patients with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency. N Engl J Med 343: 1362–1368, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Weise M, Mehlinger SL, Drinkard B, Rawson E, Charmandari E, Hiroi M, Eisenhofer G, Yanovski JA, Chrousos GP, and Merke DP. Patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia have decreased epinephrine reserve and defective glucose elevation in response to high-intensity exercise. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 591–597, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Brunner HG, Nelen M, Breakefield XO, Ropers HH, and van Oost BA. Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262: 578–580, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Abeling NG, Berger W, Murphy DL, Konings CH, Wagemakers LM, Kopin IJ, Karoum F, van Gennip AH, and Brunner HG. Specific genetic deficiencies of the A and B isoenzymes of monoamine oxidase are characterized by distinct neurochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Invest 97: 1010–1019, 1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Petrak O, Haluzikova D, Kavalkova P, Strauch B, Rosa J, Holaj R, Brabcova Vrankova A, Michalsky D, Haluzik M, Zelinka T, and Widimsky J Jr. Changes in energy metabolism in pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 1651–1658, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Okamura T, Nakajima Y, Satoh T, Hashimoto K, Sapkota S, Yamada E, Okada S, Fukuda J, Higuchi T, Tsushima Y, and Yamada M. Changes in visceral and subcutaneous fat mass in patients with pheochromocytoma. Metabolism 64: 706–712, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Spyroglou A, Adolf C, Hahner S, Quinkler M, Ladurner R, Reincke M, and Beuschlein F. Changes in Body Mass Index in Pheochromocytoma Patients Following Adrenalectomy. Horm Metab Res 49: 208–213, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.La Batide-Alanore A, Chatellier G, and Plouin PF. Diabetes as a marker of pheochromocytoma in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 21: 1703–1707, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Beninato T, Kluijfhout WP, Drake FT, Lim J, Kwon JS, Xiong M, Shen WT, Gosnell JE, Liu C, Suh I, and Duh QY. Resection of Pheochromocytoma Improves Diabetes Mellitus in the Majority of Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 24: 1208–1213, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Imperato-McGinley J, Gautier T, Ehlers K, Zullo MA, Goldstein DS, and Vaughan ED Jr., Reversibility of catecholamine-induced dilated cardiomyopathy in a child with a pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 316: 793–797, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Linehan WM, Walther MM, Goldstein DS, and Keiser HR. Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. N Engl J Med 340: 1872–1879, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Eisenhofer G, Walther M, Huynh T-T, and al e. Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 1999–2008, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Wittstein IS, Thiemann DR, Lima JA, Baughman KL, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, Wu KC, Rade JJ, Bivalacqua TJ, and Champion HC. Neurohumoral features of myocardial stunning due to sudden emotional stress. N Engl J Med 352: 539–548, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Hasking GJ, Esler MD, Jennings GL, Burton D, Johns JA, and Korner PI. Norepinephrine spillover to plasma in patients with congestive heart failure: evidence of increased overall and cardiorenal sympathetic nervous activity. Circulation 73: 615–621, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, Garberg V, Lura D, Francis GS, Simon AB, and Rector T. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 311: 819–823, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Ziegler MG, Lake CR, and Kopin IJ. The sympathetic-nervous-system defect in primary orthostatic hypotension. N Engl J Med 296: 293–297, 1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Louis WJ, Doyle AE, and Anavekar S. Plasma norepinephrine levels in essential hypertension. N Engl J Med 288: 599–601, 1973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Goldstein DS, and Lake CR. Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine levels in essential hypertension. Fed Proc 43: 57–61, 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Goldstein DS, Grossman E, Listwak S, and Folio CJ. Sympathetic reactivity during a yohimbine challenge test in essential hypertension. Hypertension 18 (Suppl. III): III–40–III–48, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Goldstein DS, Lake CR, Chernow B, Ziegler MG, Coleman MD, Taylor AA, Mitchell JR, Kopin IJ, and Keiser HR. Age-dependence of hypertensive-normotensive differences in plasma norepinephrine. Hypertension 5: 100–104, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Grassi G, Mark A, and Esler M. The sympathetic nervous system alterations in human hypertension. Circ Res 116: 976–990, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Krishna GG, Danovitch GM, Beck FW, and Sowers JR. Dopaminergic mediation of the natriuretic response to volume expansion. JLabClinMed 105: 214–218, 1985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Seri I, Kone BC, Gullans SR, Aperia A, Brenner BM, and Ballermann BJ. Locally formed dopamine inhibits Na+-K+-ATPase activity in rat renal cortical tubule cells. Am J Physiol 255: F666–673, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Jeffrey RF, MacDonald TM, Marwick K, and Lee MR. The effect of carbidopa and indomethacin on the renal response to gamma-L-glutamyl-L-dopa in normal man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 25: 195–201, 1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Grossman E, Shenkar A, Peleg E, Thaler M, and Goldstein DS. Renal effects of L-DOPA in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 33: 922–928, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Ferreira A, Bettencourt P, Pimenta J, Frioes F, Pestana M, Soares-da-Silva P, and Cerqueira-Gomes M. The renal dopaminergic system, neurohumoral activation, and sodium handling in heart failure. Am Heart J 143: 391–397, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Nishi A, Bertorello AM, and Aperia A. High salt diet down-regulates proximal tubule Na+, K(+)-ATPase activity in Dahl salt-resistant but not in Dahl salt-sensitive rats: evidence of defective dopamine regulation. Acta Physiol Scand 144: 263–267, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Frank SM, Naqibuddin M, Dendi R, Snader S, and Calkins H. Sympathoadrenal imbalance before neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Cardiol 91: 53–58, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Klingenheben T, Kalusche D, Li YG, Schopperl M, and Hohnloser SH. Changes in plasma epinephrine concentration and in heart rate during head-up tilt testing in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: correlation with successful therapy with beta-receptor antagonists. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7: 802–808, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Kikushima S, Kobayashi Y, Nakagawa H, and Katagiri T. Triggering mechanism for neurally mediated syncope induced by head-up tilt test: role of catecholamines and response to propranolol. J Am Coll Cardiol 33: 350–357, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Tank J, and Fernandez-Violante R. The elusive pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope. Circulation 102: 2898–2906, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Benditt DG, Ermis C, Padanilam B, Samniah N, and Sakaguchi S. Catecholamine response during haemodynamically stable upright posture in individuals with and without tilt-table induced vasovagal syncope. Europace 5: 65–70, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Willemsen MA, Verbeek MM, Kamsteeg EJ, de Rijk-van Andel JF, Aeby A, Blau N, Burlina A, Donati MA, Geurtz B, Grattan-Smith PJ, Haeussler M, Hoffmann GF, Jung H, de Klerk JB, van der Knaap MS, Kok F, Leuzzi V, de Lonlay P, Megarbane A, Monaghan H, Renier WO, Rondot P, Ryan MM, Seeger J, Smeitink JA, Steenbergen-Spanjers GC, Wassmer E, Weschke B, Wijburg FA, Wilcken B, Zafeiriou DI, and Wevers RA. Tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency: a treatable disorder of brain catecholamine biosynthesis. Brain 133: 1810–1822, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Zafeiriou DI, Willemsen MA, Verbeek MM, Vargiami E, Ververi A, and Wevers R. Tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency with severe clinical course. Mol Genet Metab 97: 18–20, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Kopin IJ. Storage and metabolism of catecholamines: the role of monoamine oxidase. Pharmacol Rev 16: 179–191, 1964. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Eisenhofer G, Esler MD, Meredith IT, Dart A, Cannon RO 3rd, Quyyumi AA, Lambert G, Chin J, Jennings GL, and Goldstein DS. Sympathetic nervous function in human heart as assessed by cardiac spillovers of dihydroxyphenylglycol and norepinephrine. Circulation 85: 1775–1785., 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Eisenhofer G, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. Leaky catecholamine stores: undue waste or a stress response coping mechanism? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1018: 224–230, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Blombery PA, Kopin IJ, Gordon EK, Markey SP, and Ebert MH. Conversion of MHPG to vanillylmandelic acid. Implications for the importance of urinary MHPG. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37: 1095–1098, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Goldstein DS, Eisenhofer G, Stull R, Folio CJ, Keiser HR, and Kopin IJ. Plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol and the intraneuronal disposition of norepinephrine in humans. J Clin Invest 81: 213–220, 1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Howes LG, Hawksby CC, and Reid JL. Comparison of plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethylene glycol (DHPG) and norepinephrine levels as indices of sympathetic activity in man. Eur J Clin Invest 16: 18–21, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Ropchak TG, Nguyen HQ, Keiser HR, and Kopin IJ. Source and physiological significance of plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol. J Auton Nerv Syst 24: 1–14, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Tang SW, Stancer HC, Takahashi S, Shephard RJ, and Warsh JJ. Controlled exercise elevates plasma but not urinary MHPG and VMA. Psychiatry Res 4: 13–20, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Eisenhofer G, Esler MD, Cox HS, Meredith IT, Jennings GL, Brush JE Jr., and Goldstein DS. Differences in the neuronal removal of circulating epinephrine and norepinephrine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70: 1710–1720, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Gu H, Wall SC, and Rudnick G. Stable expression of biogenic amine transporters reveals differences in inhibitor sensitivity, kinetics, and ion dependence. J Biol Chem 269: 7124–7130, 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Goldstein DS, Chang PC, Eisenhofer G, Miletich R, Finn R, Bacher J, Kirk KL, Bacharach S, and Kopin IJ. Positron emission tomographic imaging of cardiac sympathetic innervation and function. Circulation 81: 1606–1621, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Labrosse EH, Axelrod J, and Kety SS. O-Methylation, the principal route of metabolism of epinephrine in man. Science 128: 593–594, 1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Kaplan GP, Hartman BK, and Creveling CR. Immunohistochemical demonstration of catechol-o-methyltransferase in mammalian brain. Brain Res 167: 241–250, 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Kaplan GP, Hartman BK, and Creveling CR. Immunohistochemical localization of catechol-O-methyltransferase in circumventricular organs of the rat: potential variations in the blood-brain barrier to native catechols. Brain Res 229: 323–335, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Karhunen T, Tilgmann C, Ulmanen I, and Panula P. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) in rat brain: immunoelectron microscopic study with an antiserum against rat recombinant COMT protein. NeurosciLett 187: 57–60, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Matsumoto M, Weickert CS, Akil M, Lipska BK, Hyde TM, Herman MM, Kleinman JE, and Weinberger DR. Catechol O-methyltransferase mRNA expression in human and rat brain: evidence for a role in cortical neuronal function. Neuroscience 116: 127–137, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Zeng BY, Balfour RH, Jackson MJ, Rose S, and Jenner P. Expression of catechol-O-methyltransferase in the brain and periphery of normal and MPTP-treated common marmosets. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 117: 45–51, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Schendzielorz N, Oinas JP, Myohanen TT, Reenila I, Raasmaja A, and Mannisto PT. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) protein expression and activity after dopaminergic and noradrenergic lesions of the rat brain. PLoS One 8: e61392, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Weinshilboum RM. Human erythrocyte catechol-O-methyltransferase: correlation with lung and kidney activity. LifeSci 22: 625–630, 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Nissinen E, Tuominen R, Perhoniemi V, and Kaakkola S. Catechol-O-methyltransferase activity in human and rat small intestine. LifeSci 42: 2609–2614, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Karhunen T, Tilgmann C, Ulmanen I, Julkunen I, and Panula P. Distribution of catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme in rat tissues. J Histochem Cytochem 42: 1079–1090, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.LaBrosse EH, and Karon M. Catechol-O-methyltransferase activity in neuroblastoma tumor. Nature 196: 1222–1223, 1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Eisenhofer G, Keiser H, Friberg P, Mezey E, Huynh T-T, Hiremagalur B, Ellingson T, Duddempudi S, Eijsbouts A, and Lenders J. Plasma metanephrines are markers of pheochromocytoma produced by catechol-O-methyltransferase within tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 2175–2185, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Reid JJ, Stitzel RE, and Head RJ. Evidence that 6-hydroxydopamine is an inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase in intact tissue. J Pharm Pharmacol 38: 46–50, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Eisenhofer G, McCarty R, Pacak K, Russ H, and Schomig E. Disprocynium24, a novel inhibitor of the extraneuronal monoamine transporter, has potent effects on the inactivation of circulating noradrenaline and adrenaline in conscious rat. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 354: 287–294, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Goldstein DS, Brush JE Jr., Eisenhofer G, Stull R, and Esler M. In vivo measurement of neuronal uptake of norepinephrine in the human heart. Circulation 78: 41–48, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Cannon WB. Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev 9: 399–431, 1929. [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Alousi A, and Weiner N. The regulation of norepinephrine synthesis in sympathetic nerves: effect of nerve stimulation, cocaine, and catecholamine-releasing agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 56: 1491–1496, 1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Pearl RG, and Seiden LS. d-Amphetamine-induced increase in catecholamine synthesis in the corpus striatum of the rat: persistence of the effect after tolerance. J Neural Transm 44: 21–38, 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Vrana SL, Vrana KE, Koves TR, Smith JE, and Dworkin SI. Chronic cocaine administration increases CNS tyrosine hydroxylase enzyme activity and mRNA levels and tryptophan hydroxylase enzyme activity levels. J Neurochem 61: 2262–2268, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Masserano JM, Baker I, Natsukari N, and Wyatt RJ. Chronic cocaine administration increases tyrosine hydroxylase activity in the ventral tegmental area through glutaminergic- and dopaminergic D2-receptor mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 217: 73–76, 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Carotenuto F, Tsikaridze N, Rook L, Lordkipanidze D, Longo L, Condemi S, and Raia P. Venturing out safely: The biogeography of Homo erectus dispersal out of Africa. J Hum Evol 95: 1–12, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Zoller RP, Mark AL, Abboud FM, Schmid PG, and Heistad DD. The role of low pressure baroreceptors in reflex vasoconstrictor responses in man. J Clin Invest 51: 2967–2972, 1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Lake CR, Ziegler MG, and Kopin IJ. Use of plasma norepinephrine for evaluation of sympathetic neuronal function in man. Life Sci 18: 1315–1325, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Goldstein DS, and Holmes C. Neuronal source of plasma dopamine. Clin Chem 54: 1864–1871, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Urhausen A, Weiler B, Coen B, and Kindermann W. Plasma catecholamines during endurance exercise of different intensities as related to the individual anaerobic threshold. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 69: 16–20, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Strobel G, Friedmann B, Siebold R, and Bartsch P. Effect of severe exercise on plasma catecholamines in differently trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 560–565, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Yoshizumi M, Nakaya Y, Hibino T, Nomura M, Minakuchi K, Kitagawa T, Katoh I, Ohuchi T, and Oka M. Changes in plasma free and sulfoconjugated catecholamines before and after acute physical exercise: experimental and clinical studies. Life Sci 51: 227–234, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Sothmann MS, Blaney J, Woulfe T, Donahue-Fuhrman S, Lefever K, Gustafson AB, and Murthy VS. Plasma free and sulfoconjugated catecholamines during sustained exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985) 68: 452–456, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Shimizu H, and Okabe M. Evolutionary origin of autonomic regulation of physiological activities in vertebrate phyla. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 193: 1013–1019, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Errico JP, Ben-Azu B, Gargus M, Newell Rogers MK, and Tremblay ME. Sympathetic-parasympathetic system deregulation theory of aging. NPJ Aging 11: 100, 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Goldstein DS. Adrenaline and the Inner World: An Introduction to Scientific Integrative Medicine. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Welle S, Lilavivat U, and Campbell RG. Thermic effect of feeding in man: increased plasma norepinephrine levels following glucose but not protein or fat consumption. Metabolism 30: 953–958, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Schwartz RS, Jaeger LF, and Veith RC. The thermic effect of feeding in older men: the importance of the sympathetic nervous system. Metabolism 39: 733–737, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Schwartz RS, Jaeger LF, Silberstein S, and Veith RC. Sympathetic nervous system activity and the thermic effect of feeding in man. Int J Obes 11: 141–149, 1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Penev P, Spiegel K, Marcinkowski T, and Van Cauter E. Impact of carbohydrate-rich meals on plasma epinephrine levels: dysregulation with aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 6198–6206, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Patel JN, Eisenhofer G, Coppack SW, and Miles JM. Norepinephrine spillover in forearm and subcutaneous adipose tissue before and after eating. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 2815–2819, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Goldstein DS, Breier A, Wolkowitz OM, Pickar D, and Lenders JW. Plasma levels of catecholamines and corticotrophin during acute glucopenia induced by 2-deoxy-D-glucose in normal man. Clin Auton Res 2: 359–366, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Breier A, Davis O, Buchanan R, Listwak SJ, Holmes C, Pickar D, and Goldstein DS. Effects of alprazolam on pituitary-adrenal and catecholaminergic responses to metabolic stress in humans. Biol Psychiatry 32: 880–890, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Yamaguchi N, Briand R, and Brassard M. Direct evidence that an increase in aortic norepinephrine level in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia is due to increased adrenal norepinephrine output. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 67: 499–505, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Paramore DS, Fanelli CG, Shah SD, and Cryer PE. Forearm norepinephrine spillover during standing, hyperinsulinemia, and hypoglycemia. The American journal of physiology 275: E872–881, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Patel JN, Coppack SW, Goldstein DS, Miles JM, and Eisenhofer G. Norepinephrine spillover from human adipose tissue before and after a 72-hour fast. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3373–3377, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Blagden C Experiments and observations in an heated room. Phil Trans Royal Soc 65: 111–124, 1775. [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Morris D The Naked Ape: A Zoologist’s Study of the Human Animal. London, UK: Jonathan Cape, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 326.McKenna ZJ, Foster J, Atkins WC, Jarrard CP, Sarma S, and Crandall CG. Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine responses to extreme heat exposures in young and older adults. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 327: R188–R194, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Goldstein DS, and Frank SM. The wisdom of the body revisited: The adrenomedullary response to mild core hypothermia in humans. Endocrine Regul 35: 3–7, 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Frank SM, Raja SN, Bulcao CF, and Goldstein DS. Relative contribution of core and cutaneous temperatures to thermal comfort and autonomic responses in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 86: 1588–1593, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Frank SM, Raja SN, Bulcao C, and Goldstein DS. Age-related thermoregulatory differences during core cooling in humans. Am J Physiol 279: R349–354, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Frank SM, Satitpunwaycha P, Bruce SR, Herscovitch P, and Goldstein DS. Increased myocardial perfusion and sympathoadrenal activation during mild core hypothermia in awake humans. Clin Sci 104: 503–508, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Frank SM, Cattaneo CG, Wieneke-Brady MB, El-Rahmany H, Gupta N, Lima JA, and Goldstein DS. Threshold for adrenomedullary activation and increased cardiac work during mild core hypothermia. Clin Sci 102: 119–125, 2002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Durand S, Cui J, Williams KD, and Crandall CG. Skin surface cooling improves orthostatic tolerance in normothermic individuals. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 286: R199–205, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Cui J, Durand S, Levine BD, and Crandall CG. Effect of skin surface cooling on central venous pressure during orthostatic challenge. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2429–2433, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Sterling P, and Eyer J. Allostasis: a new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In: Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition, and Health, edited by Fisher J, and Reason J. New York: Johns Wiley & Sons Inc., 1988, p. 629–649. [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Goldstein DS. How does homeostasis happen? Integrative physiological, systems biological, and evolutionary perspectives. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 316: R301–R317, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Palma JA, Martinez J, Camargo C, and Kaufmann H. Fear conditioning as a pathogenic mechanism in the postural tachycardia syndrome. Brain 145: 3763–3769, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.French DN, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS, Spiering BA, Judelson DA, Hoffman JR, and Maresh CM. Anticipatory responses of catecholamines on muscle force production. J Appl Physiol (1985) 102: 94–102, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Peronnet F, Cleroux J, Perrault H, Cousineau D, de Champlain J, and Nadeau R. Plasma norepinephrine response to exercise before and after training in humans. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 51: 812–815, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Kvetnansky R, Armando I, Weise VK, Holmes C, Fukuhara K, Deka-Starosta A, Kopin IJ, and Goldstein DS. Plasma dopa responses during stress: dependence on sympathoneural activity and tyrosine hydroxylation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261: 899–909, 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Goldstein DS, Udelsman R, Eisenhofer G, Stull R, Keiser HR, and Kopin IJ. Neuronal source of plasma dihydroxyphenylalanine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64: 856–861, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.van Zwieten PA, Thoolen MJ, and Timmermans PB. The hypotensive activity and side effects of methyldopa, clonidine, and guanfacine. Hypertension 6: II28–33, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Struthers AD, Brown MJ, Adams EF, and Dollery CT. The plasma noradrenaline and growth hormone response to alpha-methyldopa and clonidine in hypertensive subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 19: 311–317, 1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Cotzias GC. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinsonism. JAMA 218: 1903–1908, 1971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Palma JA, Martinez J, and Kaufmann H. Carbidopa for Afferent Baroreflex Failure in Familial Dysautonomia: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial. Hypertension 76: 724–731, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Kaufmann H, Saadia D, Voustianiouk A, Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Yahr MD, Nardin R, and Freeman R. Norepinephrine precursor therapy in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Circulation 108: 724–728, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Sewell L, Pechnik S, and Kopin IJ. Effects of carbidopa and entacapone on the metabolic fate of the norepinephrine prodrug L-DOPS. J Clin Pharmacol 51: 66–74, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Sundberg S, Scheinin M, Illi A, Akkila J, Gordin A, and Keranen T. The effects of the COMT inhibitor entacapone on haemodynamics and peripheral catecholamine metabolism during exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol 36: 451–456, 1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Lees AJ, Ferreira J, Rascol O, Poewe W, Rocha JF, McCrory M, Soares-da-Silva P, and Investigators B-S. Opicapone as Adjunct to Levodopa Therapy in Patients With Parkinson Disease and Motor Fluctuations: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 74: 197–206, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Rose S, Jenner P, and Marsden CD. The effect of carbidopa on plasma and muscle levels of L-dopa, dopamine, and their metabolites following L-dopa administration to rats. Mov Disord 3: 117–125, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Kaakkola S, Mannisto PT, Nissinen E, Vuorela A, and Mantyla R. The effect of an increased ratio of carbidopa to levodopa on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa. Acta Neurol Scand 72: 385–391, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Saito I, Kawabe H, Hasegawa C, Iwaida Y, Yamakawa H, Saruta T, Takeshita E, Nagano S, and Sekihara T. Effect of L-dopa in young patients with hypertension. Angiology 42: 691–695, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Cuche JL, Prinseau J, Selz F, Ruget G, Tual JL, Reingeissen L, Devoisin M, Baglin A, Guedon J, and Fritel D. Oral load of tyrosine or L-dopa and plasma levels of free and sulfoconjugated catecholamines in healthy men. Hypertension 7: 81–89, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Bowers MB Jr. Plasma HVA and MHPG in psychiatric patients with renal failure and levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 8: 450–452, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Boomsma F, Meerwaldt JD, Man in’t Veld AJ, Hovestadt A, and Schalekamp MA. Treatment of idiopathic parkinsonism with L-dopa in the absence and presence of decarboxylase inhibitors: effects on plasma levels of L-dopa, dopa decarboxylase, catecholamines and 3-O-methyl-dopa. J Neurol 236: 223–230, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Muenter MD, Sharpless NS, and Tyce GM. Plasma 3-0-methyldopa in L-dopa therapy of Parkinson’s disease. Mayo Clin Proc 47: 389–395, 1972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Hovevey-Sion D, Kopin IJ, Stull RW, and Goldstein DS. Effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors on levels of catechols and homovanillic acid in striatum and plasma. Neuropharmacology 28: 791–797, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Murphy DL, Lipper S, Slater S, and Shiling D. Selectivity of clorgyline and pargyline as inhibitors of monoamine oxidases A and B in vivo in man. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 62: 129–132, 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Stull R, Keiser HR, Sunderland T, Murphy DL, and Kopin IJ. Simultaneous liquid-chromatographic determination of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, catecholamines, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine in plasma, and their responses to inhibition of monoamine oxidase. Clin Chem 32: 2030–2033, 1986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Fowler JS, Logan J, Volkow ND, Shumay E, McCall-Perez F, Jayne M, Wang GJ, Alexoff DL, Apelskog-Torres K, Hubbard B, Carter P, King P, Fahn S, Gilmor M, Telang F, Shea C, Xu Y, and Muench L. Evidence that formulations of the selective MAO-B inhibitor, selegiline, which bypass first-pass metabolism, also inhibit MAO-A in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 40: 650–657, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Estan L, Senard JM, Tran MA, Montastruc JL, and Berlan M. Reserpine induces vascular alpha 2-adrenergic supersensitivity and platelet alpha 2-adrenoceptor up-regulation in dog. Br J Pharmacol 101: 329–336, 1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Imrich R, Eldadah BA, Bentho O, Pechnik S, Sharabi Y, Holmes C, Grossman E, and Goldstein DS. Functional effects of cardiac sympathetic denervation in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15: 122–127, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Jacob G, Costa F, Shannon JR, Robertson RM, Wathen M, Stein M, Biaggioni I, Ertl A, Black B, and Robertson D. The neuropathic postural tachycardia syndrome. N Engl J Med 343: 1008–1014, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Shannon JR, Flattem NL, Jordan J, Jacob G, Black BK, Biaggioni I, Blakely RD, and Robertson D. Orthostatic intolerance and tachycardia associated with norepinephrine-transporter deficiency. N Engl J Med 342: 541–549, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Holmes C, Moak J, Eldadah B, Zimmerly E, Sharabi Y, and Goldstein DS. Dopamine contamination of infused tyramine. Clin Chem 51: 1733–1735, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Jacob G, Gamboa A, Diedrich A, Shibao C, Robertson D, and Biaggioni I. Tyramine-induced vasodilation mediated by dopamine contamination: a paradox resolved. Hypertension 46: 355–359, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Goldberg MR, and Robertson D. Evidence for the existence of vascular alpha 2-adrenergic receptors in humans. Hypertension 6: 551–556, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Goldstein DS, Golczynska A, Stuhlmuller J, Holmes C, Rea RF, Grossman E, and Lenders J. A test of the “epinephrine hypothesis” in humans. Hypertension 33: 36–43, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Kaufman S, Holtzman NA, Milstien S, Butler LJ, and Krumholz A. Phenylketonuria due to a deficiency of dihydropteridine reductase. N Engl J Med 293: 785–790, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Niederwieser A, Blau N, Wang M, Joller P, Atares M, and Cardesa-Garcia J. GTP cyclohydrolase I deficiency, a new enzyme defect causing hyperphenylalaninemia with neopterin, biopterin, dopamine, and serotonin deficiencies and muscular hypotonia. Eur J Pediatr 141: 208–214, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Goldstein DS, Hahn S-H, Holmes C, Tifft C, Harvey-White J, Milstien S, and Kaufman S. Monoaminergic effects of folinic acid, L-DOPA, and 5-hydroxytryptophan in dihydropteridine reductase deficiency. Journal of Neurochemistry 64: 2810–2813, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Hyland K, and Reott M. Prevalence of Aromatic l-Amino Acid Decarboxylase Deficiency in At-Risk Populations. Pediatr Neurol 106: 38–42, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Wassenberg T, Deinum J, van Ittersum FJ, Kamsteeg EJ, Pennings M, Verbeek MM, Wevers RA, van Albada ME, Kema IP, Versmissen J, van den Meiracker T, Lenders JWM, Monnens L, and Willemsen MA. Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up of dopamine beta hydroxylase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis 44: 554–565, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Biaggioni I, Goldstein DS, Atkinson T, and Robertson D. Dopamine-beta-hydroxylase deficiency in humans. Neurology 40: 370–373, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Timmers HJ, Deinum J, Wevers RA, and Lenders JW. Congenital dopamine-beta-hydroxylase deficiency in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1018: 520–523, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, and Axelrod FB. Plasma catechols in familial dysautonomia: a long-term follow-up study. Neurochem Res 33: 1889–1893, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Kaler SG, Holmes CS, Goldstein DS, Tang J, Godwin SC, Donsante A, Liew CJ, Sato S, and Patronas N. Neonatal diagnosis and treatment of Menkes disease. N Engl J Med 358: 605–614, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Axelrod FB, Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Berlin D, and Kopin IJ. Pattern of plasma levels of catecholamines in familial dysautonomia. Clin Auton Res 6: 205–209, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Charmandari E, Eisenhofer G, Mehlinger SL, Carlson A, Wesley R, Keil MF, Chrousos GP, New MI, and Merke DP. Adrenomedullary function may predict phenotype and genotype in classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 3031–3037, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Qayyum A, Zai CC, Hirata Y, Tiwari AK, Cheema S, Nowrouzi B, Beitchman JH, and Kennedy JL. The Role of the Catechol-o-Methyltransferase (COMT) GeneVal158Met in Aggressive Behavior, a Review of Genetic Studies. Curr Neuropharmacol 13: 802–814, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, Linehan WM, Mannelli M, Friberg P, Keiser HR, Goldstein DS, and Eisenhofer G. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA 287: 1427–1434, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Siegert G, Bornstein SR, Friberg P, Milosevic D, Mannelli M, Linehan WM, Adams K, Timmers HJ, and Pacak K. Plasma methoxytyramine: a novel biomarker of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in relation to established risk factors of tumour size, location and SDHB mutation status. Eur J Cancer 48: 1739–1749, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grebe SK, Murad MH, Naruse M, Pacak K, Young WF Jr., and Endocrine S Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99: 1915–1942, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Casey RT, Hendriks E, Deal C, Waguespack SG, Wiegering V, Redlich A, Akker S, Prasad R, Fassnacht M, Clifton-Bligh R, Amar L, Bornstein S, Canu L, Charmandari E, Chrisoulidou A, Freixes MC, de Krijger R, de Sanctis L, Fojo A, Ghia AJ, Huebner A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Kuhlen M, Raffaelli M, Lussey-Lepoutre C, Marks SD, Nilubol N, Parasiliti-Caprino M, Timmers H, Zietlow AL, Robledo M, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grossman AB, Taieb D, Maher ER, Lenders JWM, Eisenhofer G, Jimenez C, Pacak K, and Pamporaki C. International consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children and adolescents. Nat Rev Endocrinol 20: 729–748, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.LaBrosse EH, Comoy E, Bohuon C, Zucker JM, and Schweisguth O. Catecholamine metabolism in neuroblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 57: 633–638, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Peitzsch M, Butch ER, Lovorn E, Mangelis A, Furman WL, Santana VM, Hero B, Berthold F, Shulkin BL, Huebner A, and Eisenhofer G. Biochemical testing for neuroblastoma using plasma free 3-O-methyldopa, 3-methoxytyramine, and normetanephrine. Pediatr Blood Cancer 67: e28081, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Biondi M, Barco S, Cangelosi D, Cafaro A, Morini M, Pigliasco F, Rossi L, Mancin F, Conte M, Garaventa A, and Cangemi G. Measurement of 3-O-methyldopa from dried plasma microsamples by high-resolution mass spectrometry: A tool for the diagnosis of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Clin Chim Acta 565: 120005, 2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Agrup G, Andersson T, Falck B, Persson K, Rorsman H, Rosengren AM, and Rosengren E. 5-S-cysteinyldopa in the plasma of melanoma patients and the renal clearance of this amino acid. Acta Derm Venereol 55: 5–6, 1975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Horikoshi T, and Ito S. Serum 5-S-cysteinyldopa (5-S-CD) as a marker of melanoma progression. J Dermatol 19: 809–813, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Wakamatsu K, Kageshita T, Furue M, Hatta N, Kiyohara Y, Nakayama J, Ono T, Saida T, Takata M, Tsuchida T, Uhara H, Yamamoto A, Yamazaki N, Naito A, and Ito S. Evaluation of 5-S-cysteinyldopa as a marker of melanoma progression: 10 years’ experience. Melanoma Res 12: 245–253, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Chidsey CA, and Braunwald E. Sympathetic activity and neurotransmitter depletion in congestive heart failure. Pharmacol Rev 18: 685–700, 1966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Meredith IT, Eisenhofer G, Lambert GW, Dewar EM, Jennings GL, and Esler MD. Cardiac sympathetic nervous activity in congestive heart failure. Evidence for increased neuronal norepinephrine release and preserved neuronal uptake. Circulation 88: 136–145, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Monroe TB, and Anderson EJ. A Catecholaldehyde Metabolite of Norepinephrine Induces Myofibroblast Activation and Toxicity via the Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts: Mitigating Role of l-Carnosine. Chem Res Toxicol 34: 2194–2201, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Nahvi RJ, Tanelian A, Nwokafor C, Godino A, Parise E, Estill M, Shen L, Nestler EJ, and Sabban EL. Transcriptome profiles associated with resilience and susceptibility to single prolonged stress in the locus coeruleus and nucleus accumbens in male sprague-dawley rats. Behav Brain Res 439: 114162, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Serova LI, Nwokafor C, Van Bockstaele EJ, Reyes BAS, Lin X, and Sabban EL. Single prolonged stress PTSD model triggers progressive severity of anxiety, altered gene expression in locus coeruleus and hypothalamus and effected sensitivity to NPY. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 29: 482–492, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Sabban EL, Serova LI, Newman E, Aisenberg N, and Akirav I. Changes in Gene Expression in the Locus Coeruleus-Amygdala Circuitry in Inhibitory Avoidance PTSD Model. Cell Mol Neurobiol 38: 273–280, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Sabban EL, Tillinger A, Nostramo R, and Serova L. Stress triggered changes in expression of genes for neurosecretory granules in adrenal medulla. Cell Mol Neurobiol 32: 795–800, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Tillinger A, Sollas A, Serova LI, Kvetnansky R, and Sabban EL. Vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs) in adrenal chromaffin cells: stress-triggered induction of VMAT2 and expression in epinephrine synthesizing cells. Cell Mol Neurobiol 30: 1459–1465, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Kvetnansky R, Sabban EL, and Palkovits M. Catecholaminergic systems in stress: structural and molecular genetic approaches. Physiol Rev 89: 535–606, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Kvetnansky R, Krizanova O, Tillinger A, Sabban EL, Thomas SA, and Kubovcakova L. Regulation of gene expression of catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes in dopamine-beta-hydroxylase- and CRH-knockout mice exposed to stress. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1148: 257–268, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Naoi M, Maruyama W, Shamoto-Nagai M, and Riederer P. Toxic interactions between dopamine, alpha-synuclein, monoamine oxidase, and genes in mitochondria of Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 131: 639–661, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Turkkan JS, Harris AH, and Goldstein DS. Do chronically repeated pressor episodes cause sustained elevations in blood pressure? In: Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease, edited by Weiss SM, Matthews KA, Detre T, and Graef JANIH Publication No. 84–2698, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Frank SM, Dendi R, Cannon RO 3rd, Sharabi Y, Esler MD, and Eisenhofer G. Cardiac sympathetic dysautonomia in chronic orthostatic intolerance syndromes. Circulation 106: 2358–2365, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Goldstein DS, Eldadah B, Holmes C, Pechnik S, Moak J, and Sharabi Y. Neurocirculatory abnormalities in chronic orthostatic intolerance. Circulation 111: 839–845, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Dickinson CJ. Fainting precipitated by collapse-firing of venous baroreceptors. Lancet 342: 970–972, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Scherrer U, Vissing S, Morgan BJ, Hanson P, and Victor RG. Vasovagal syncope after infusion of a vasodilator in a heart-transplant recipient. N Engl J Med 322: 602–604, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Novak V, Honos G, and Schondorf R. Is the heart “empty’ at syncope? JAutonNervSyst 60: 83–92, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Goldstein DS, Spanarkel M, Pitterman A, Toltzis R, Gratz E, Epstein S, and Keiser HR. Circulatory control mechanisms in vasodepressor syncope. Am Heart J 104: 1071–1075, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Sra JS, Murthy V, Natale A, Jazayeri MR, Dhala A, Deshpande S, Sheth M, and Akhtar M. Circulatory and catecholamine changes during head-up tilt testing in neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope. Am J Cardiol 73: 33–37, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Jacobs MC, Goldstein DS, Willemsen JJ, Smits P, Thien T, Dionne RA, and Lenders JW. Neurohumoral antecedents of vasodepressor reactions. Eur J Clin Invest 25: 754–761., 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Selye H The Stress of Life. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956. [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Chrousos GP, and Gold PW. The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. J Am Med Assoc 267: 1244–1252, 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Kosten TR, Mason JW, Giller EL, Ostroff RB, and Harkness L. Sustained urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine elevation in post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 12: 13–20, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Pitman RK, and Orr SP. Twenty-four hour urinary cortisol and catecholamine excretion in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 27: 245–247, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Yehuda R, Southwick S, Giller EL, Ma X, and Mason JW. Urinary catecholamine excretion and severity of PTSD symptoms in Vietnam combat veterans. J Nerv Ment Dis 180: 321–325, 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Young EA, and Breslau N. Cortisol and catecholamines in posttraumatic stress disorder: an epidemiologic community study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61: 394–401, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Murburg MM, McFall ME, Lewis N, and Veith RC. Plasma norepinephrine kinetics in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 38: 819–825, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Yehuda R, Siever LJ, Teicher MH, Levengood RA, Gerber DK, Schmeidler J, and Yang RK. Plasma norepinephrine and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol concentrations and severity of depression in combat posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 44: 56–63, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.McFall ME, Murburg MM, Ko GN, and Veith RC. Autonomic responses to stress in Vietnam combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 27: 1165–1175, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Blanchard EB, Kolb LC, Prins A, Gates S, and McCoy GC. Changes in plasma norepinephrine to combat-related stimuli among Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 179: 371–373, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Southwick SM, Krystal JH, Morgan CA, Johnson D, Nagy LM, Nicolaou A, Heninger GR, and Charney DS. Abnormal noradrenergic function in posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50: 266–274, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Geracioti TD Jr., Baker DG, Ekhator NN, West SA, Hill KK, Bruce AB, Schmidt D, Rounds-Kugler B, Yehuda R, Keck PE Jr., and Kasckow JW. CSF norepinephrine concentrations in posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry 158: 1227–1230, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.Raskind MA, Dobie DJ, Kanter ED, Petrie EC, Thompson CE, and Peskind ER. The alpha1-adrenergic antagonist prazosin ameliorates combat trauma nightmares in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: a report of 4 cases. J Clin Psychiatry 61: 129–133, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Raskind MA, Thompson C, Petrie EC, Dobie DJ, Rein RJ, Hoff DJ, McFall ME, and Peskind ER. Prazosin reduces nightmares in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 63: 565–568, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Chow B, Harris C, Davis-Karim A, Holmes HA, Hart KL, McFall M, Mellman TA, Reist C, Romesser J, Rosenheck R, Shih MC, Stein MB, Swift R, Gleason T, Lu Y, and Huang GD. Trial of Prazosin for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Military Veterans. N Engl J Med 378: 507–517, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Gatley SJ, Logan J, Ding YS, Hitzemann R, and Pappas N. Dopamine transporter occupancies in the human brain induced by therapeutic doses of oral methylphenidate. Am J Psychiatry 155: 1325–1331, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Bymaster FP, Katner JS, Nelson DL, Hemrick-Luecke SK, Threlkeld PG, Heiligenstein JH, Morin SM, Gehlert DR, and Perry KW. Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 699–711, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Michelson D, Faries D, Wernicke J, Kelsey D, Kendrick K, Sallee FR, Spencer T, and Atomoxetine ASG. Atomoxetine in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-response study. Pediatrics 108: E83, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Spencer T, Heiligenstein JH, Biederman J, Faries DE, Kratochvil CJ, Conners CK, and Potter WZ. Results from 2 proof-of-concept, placebo-controlled studies of atomoxetine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 63: 1140–1147, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Michelson D, Adler L, Spencer T, Reimherr FW, West SA, Allen AJ, Kelsey D, Wernicke J, Dietrich A, and Milton D. Atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: two randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Biol Psychiatry 53: 112–120, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Hauser RA, Factor SA, Marder SR, Knesevich MA, Ramirez PM, Jimenez R, Burke J, Liang GS, and O’Brien CF. KINECT 3: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Valbenazine for Tardive Dyskinesia. Am J Psychiatry 174: 476–484, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Fernandez HH, Factor SA, Hauser RA, Jimenez-Shahed J, Ondo WG, Jarskog LF, Meltzer HY, Woods SW, Bega D, LeDoux MS, Shprecher DR, Davis C, Davis MD, Stamler D, and Anderson KE. Randomized controlled trial of deutetrabenazine for tardive dyskinesia: The ARM-TD study. Neurology 88: 2003–2010, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Anderson KE, Stamler D, Davis MD, Factor SA, Hauser RA, Isojarvi J, Jarskog LF, Jimenez-Shahed J, Kumar R, McEvoy JP, Ochudlo S, Ondo WG, and Fernandez HH. Deutetrabenazine for treatment of involuntary movements in patients with tardive dyskinesia (AIM-TD): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Psychiatry 4: 595–604, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Kish SJ, Shannak K, and Hornykiewicz O. Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Pathophysiologic and clinical implications. N Engl J Med 318: 876–880, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Pifl C, Rajput A, Reither H, Blesa J, Cavada C, Obeso JA, Rajput AH, and Hornykiewicz O. Is Parkinson’s disease a vesicular dopamine storage disorder? Evidence from a study in isolated synaptic vesicles of human and nonhuman primate striatum. J Neurosci 34: 8210–8218, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Caudle WM, Richardson JR, Wang MZ, Taylor TN, Guillot TS, McCormack AL, Colebrooke RE, Di Monte DA, Emson PC, and Miller GW. Reduced vesicular storage of dopamine causes progressive nigrostriatal neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 27: 8138–8148, 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Cramb KML, Beccano-Kelly D, Cragg SJ, and Wade-Martins R. Impaired dopamine release in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 146: 3117–3132, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Goldstein DS. “Sick-but-not-dead”: Multiple paths to catecholamine deficiency in Lewy Body diseases. Stress 1–16, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Montenegro P, Pueyo M, Lorenzo JN, Villar-Martinez MD, Alayon A, Carrillo F, and Borges R. A Secretory Vesicle Failure in Parkinson’s Disease Occurs in Human Platelets. Ann Neurol 91: 697–703, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Takahashi N, Miner LL, Sora I, Ujike H, Revay RS, Kostic V, Jackson-Lewis V, Przedborski S, and Uhl GR. VMAT2 knockout mice: heterozygotes display reduced amphetamine-conditioned reward, enhanced amphetamine locomotion, and enhanced MPTP toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 9938–9943, 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Wang YM, Gainetdinov RR, Fumagalli F, Xu F, Jones SR, Bock CB, Miller GW, Wightman RM, and Caron MG. Knockout of the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 gene results in neonatal death and supersensitivity to cocaine and amphetamine. Neuron 19: 1285–1296, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Taylor TN, Alter SP, Wang M, Goldstein DS, and Miller GW. Reduced vesicular storage of catecholamines causes progressive degeneration in the locus ceruleus. Neuropharmacology 76 Pt A: 97–105, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Sullivan P, Mash DC, Sidransky E, Stefani A, Kopin IJ, and Sharabi Y. Deficient vesicular storage: A common theme in catecholaminergic neurodegeneration. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 21: 1013–1022, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Bromberg-Martin ES, Matsumoto M, and Hikosaka O. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron 68: 815–834, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Mohebi A, Pettibone JR, Hamid AA, Wong JT, Vinson LT, Patriarchi T, Tian L, Kennedy RT, and Berke JD. Dissociable dopamine dynamics for learning and motivation. Nature 570: 65–70, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Solich J, Faron-Gorecka A, Kusmider M, Palach P, Gaska M, and Dziedzicka-Wasylewska M. Norepinephrine transporter (NET) knock-out upregulates dopamine and serotonin transporters in the mouse brain. Neurochem Int 59: 185–191, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Gasser PJ. Organic Cation Transporters in Brain Catecholamine Homeostasis. Handb Exp Pharmacol 266: 187–197, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Lenka A, Isonaka R, Holmes C, and Goldstein DS. Cardiac (18)F-dopamine positron emission tomography predicts the type of phenoconversion of pure autonomic failure. Clin Auton Res 33: 737–747, 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Pearson TS, Gupta N, San Sebastian W, Imamura-Ching J, Viehoever A, Grijalvo-Perez A, Fay AJ, Seth N, Lundy SM, Seo Y, Pampaloni M, Hyland K, Smith E, de Oliveira Barbosa G, Heathcock JC, Minnema A, Lonser R, Elder JB, Leonard J, Larson P, and Bankiewicz KS. Gene therapy for aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency by MR-guided direct delivery of AAV2-AADC to midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Nat Commun 12: 4251, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Goldstein DS, Pekker MJ, Sullivan P, Isonaka R, and Sharabi Y. Modeling the Progression of Cardiac Catecholamine Deficiency in Lewy Body Diseases. J Am Heart Assoc 11: e024411, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, Holmes C, Mash DC, Kopin IJ, and Sharabi Y. Determinants of denervation-independent depletion of putamen dopamine in Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 35: 88–91, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.Goldstein DS. The Catecholaldehyde Hypothesis for the Pathogenesis of Catecholaminergic Neurodegeneration: What We Know and What We Do Not Know. Int J Mol Sci 22: 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Jinsmaa Y, Sullivan P, Sharabi Y, and Goldstein DS. DOPAL is transmissible to and oligomerizes alpha-synuclein in human glial cells. Auton Neurosci 194: 46–51, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Plotegher N, Berti G, Ferrari E, Tessari I, Zanetti M, Lunelli L, Greggio E, Bisaglia M, Veronesi M, Girotto S, Dalla Serra M, Perego C, Casella L, and Bubacco L. DOPAL derived alpha-synuclein oligomers impair synaptic vesicles physiological function. Sci Rep 7: 40699, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Burbulla LF, Song P, Mazzulli JR, Zampese E, Wong YC, Jeon S, Santos DP, Blanz J, Obermaier CD, Strojny C, Savas JN, Kiskinis E, Zhuang X, Kruger R, Surmeier DJ, and Krainc D. Dopamine oxidation mediates mitochondrial and lysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Science 357: 1255–1261, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Kopin IJ, and Sharabi Y. Intra-neuronal vesicular uptake of catecholamines is decreased in patients with Lewy body diseases. J Clin Invest 121: 3320–3330, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Goldstein DS. The “Sick-but-not-Dead” Phenomenon Applied to Catecholamine Deficiency in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Semin Neurol 40: 502–514, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Brautigam C, Wevers RA, Jansen RJ, Smeitink JA, de Rijk-van Andel JF, Gabreels FJ, and Hoffmann GF. Biochemical hallmarks of tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency. Clin Chem 44: 1897–1904, 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Hyland K, and Clayton PT. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency: diagnostic methodology. Clin Chem 38: 2405–2410, 1992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Gogos JA, Morgan M, Luine V, Santha M, Ogawa S, Pfaff D, and Karayiorgou M. Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 9991–9996, 1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Wevers RA, de Rijk-van Andel JF, Brautigam C, Geurtz B, van den Heuvel LP, Steenbergen-Spanjers GC, Smeitink JA, Hoffmann GF, and Gabreels FJ. A review of biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency including a novel mutation (291delC). J Inherit Metab Dis 22: 364–373, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Kim CH, Zabetian CP, Cubells JF, Cho S, Biaggioni I, Cohen BM, Robertson D, and Kim KS. Mutations in the dopamine beta-hydroxylase gene are associated with human norepinephrine deficiency. Am J Med Genet 108: 140–147, 2002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, Holmes C, Miller GW, Sharabi Y, and Kopin IJ. A vesicular sequestration to oxidative deamination shift in myocardial sympathetic nerves in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 131: 219–228, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, Holmes C, Miller GW, Alter S, Strong R, Mash DC, Kopin IJ, and Sharabi Y. Determinants of buildup of the toxic dopamine metabolite DOPAL in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 126: 591–603, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Goldstein DS, Hahn SH, Holmes C, Tifft C, Harvey-White J, Milstien S, and Kaufman S. Monoaminergic effects of folinic acid, L-DOPA, and 5-hydroxytryptophan in dihydropteridine reductase deficiency. J Neurochem 64: 2810–2813, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Cryer PE, and Weiss S. Reduced plasma norepinephrine response to standing in autonomic dysfunction. Arch Neurol 33: 275–277, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Sjoerdsma A, Engelman K, Spector S, and Udenfriend S. Inhibition of catecholamine synthesis in man with alpha-methyl-tyrosine, an inhibitor of tyrosine hydroxylase. Lancet 2: 1092–1094, 1965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Engelman K, Horwitz D, Jequier E, and Sjoerdsma A. Biochemical and pharmacologic effects of alpha-methyltyrosine in man. J Clin Invest 47: 577–594, 1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Veith RC, Best JD, and Halter JB. Dose-dependent suppression of norepinephrine appearance rate in plasma by clonidine in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 59: 151–155, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Featherstone JA, Veith RC, Flatness D, Murburg MM, Villacres EC, and Halter JB. Age and alpha-2 adrenergic regulation of plasma norepinephrine kinetics in humans. J Gerontol 42: 271–276, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.Rojo A, Fontan A, Mena MA, Herranz A, Casado S, and de Yebenes JG. Tolcapone increases plasma catecholamine levels in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 7: 93–96, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Man in ’t Veld AJ, Boomsma F, van den Meiracker AH, Julien C, Lenders J, and Schalekamp MA. d,l-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine restores sympathetic control and cures orthostatic hypotension in dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency. J Hypertens Suppl 6: S547–549, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Hashizume K, Yamatodani A, Yamamoto T, Ogihara T, Kumahara Y, and Wada H. Effects of oral and intravenous administrations of dopamine and L-dopa on plasma levels of two isomers of dopamine sulfate in man. Life Sci 41: 2697–2704, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Stull R, Keiser HR, Sunderland T, Murphy DL, and Kopin IJ. Simultaneous liquid-chromatographic determination of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, catecholamines, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine in plasma, and their responses to inhibition of monoamine oxidase. Clin Chem 32: 2030–2033, 1986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Scheinin M, Karhuvaara S, Ojala-Karlsson P, Kallio A, and Koulu M. Plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) are insensitive indicators of alpha 2-adrenoceptor mediated regulation of norepinephrine release in healthy human volunteers. Life Sci 49: 75–84, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Sofuoglu M, Nelson D, Babb DA, and Hatsukami DK. Intravenous cocaine increases plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68: 455–459, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Molina PE, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Gifford A, Ding YS, Wong C, Pappas NR, Zhu W, and Swanson JM. Cardiovascular effects of methylphenidate in humans are associated with increases of dopamine in brain and of epinephrine in plasma. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 166: 264–270, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Esler M, Jackman G, Leonard P, Skews H, Bobik A, and Korner P. Effect of norepinephrine uptake blockers on norepinephrine kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 12–20, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Shibao C, Raj SR, Gamboa A, Diedrich A, Choi L, Black BK, Robertson D, and Biaggioni I. Norepinephrine transporter blockade with atomoxetine induces hypertension in patients with impaired autonomic function. Hypertension 50: 47–53, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.Okamoto LE, Shibao C, Gamboa A, Choi L, Diedrich A, Raj SR, Black BK, Robertson D, and Biaggioni I. Synergistic effect of norepinephrine transporter blockade and alpha-2 antagonism on blood pressure in autonomic failure. Hypertension 59: 650–656, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Scriven AJ, Brown MJ, Murphy MB, and Dollery CT. Changes in blood pressure and plasma catecholamines caused by tyramine and cold exposure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 6: 954–960, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Goldberg MR, Hollister AS, and Robertson D. Influence of yohimbine on blood pressure, autonomic reflexes, and plasma catecholamines in humans. Hypertension 5: 772–778, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Grossman E, Rea RF, Hoffman A, and Goldstein DS. Yohimbine increases sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine spillover in normal volunteers. Am J Physiol 260: R142–147, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Kuchel O, Buu NT, Hamet P, Larochelle P, Gutkowska J, Schiffrin EL, Bourque M, and Genest J. Orthostatic hypotension: a posture-induced hyperdopaminergic state. Am J Med Sci 289: 3–11, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Dzurik MV, Diedrich A, Black B, Paranjape SY, Raj SR, Byrne DW, and Robertson D. Endogenous substance P modulates human cardiovascular regulation at rest and during orthostatic load. J Appl Physiol (1985) 102: 2092–2097, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Christensen NJ, Mathias CJ, and Frankel HL. Plasma and urinary dopamine: studies during fasting and exercise and in tetraplegic man. Eur J Clin Invest 6: 403–409, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 486.Francis GS, Goldsmith SR, Ziesche SM, and Cohn JN. Response of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine to dynamic exercise in patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 49: 1152–1156, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Sothmann MS, Gustafson AB, and Chandler M. Plasma free and sulfoconjugated catecholamine responses to varying exercise intensity. J Appl Physiol (1985) 63: 654–658, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 488.Peronnet F, Cleroux J, Perrault H, Thibault G, Cousineau D, de Champlain J, Guilland JC, and Klepping J. Plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity during exercise in man. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17: 683–688, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.Kjaer M, Christensen NJ, Sonne B, Richter EA, and Galbo H. Effect of exercise on epinephrine turnover in trained and untrained male subjects. J Appl Physiol (1985) 59: 1061–1067, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.Hasking GJ, Esler MD, Jennings GL, Dewar E, and Lambert G. Norepinephrine spillover to plasma during steady-state supine bicycle exercise. Comparison of patients with congestive heart failure and normal subjects. Circulation 78: 516–521, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Devalon ML, Miller TD, Squires RW, Rogers PJ, Bove AA, and Tyce GM. Dopa in plasma increases during acute exercise and after exercise training. J Lab Clin Med 114: 321–327, 1989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Musso NR, Gianrossi R, Pende A, Vergassola C, and Lotti G. Plasma dopamine response to sympathetic activation in man: a biphasic pattern. Life Sci 47: 619–626, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 493.Raber W, Raffesberg W, Waldhausl W, Gasic S, and Roden M. Exercise induces excessive normetanephrine responses in hypertensive diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Invest 33: 480–487, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.McMorris T, Collard K, Corbett J, Dicks M, and Swain JP. A test of the catecholamines hypothesis for an acute exercise-cognition interaction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 89: 106–115, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.Tokinoya K, Shishikura Y, Sekine N, Aoyagi A, Yoshida Y, Aita Y, Sugasawa T, Nabekura Y, and Takekoshi K. Plasma free metanephrine and normethanephrine levels correlated to plasma catecholamine after acute running in amateur runner. J Exerc Sci Fit 19: 178–181, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Potter JF, Heseltine D, Hartley G, Matthews J, MacDonald IA, and James OF. Effects of meal composition on the postprandial blood pressure, catecholamine and insulin changes in elderly subjects. Clin Sci (Lond) 77: 265–272, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Eldrup E, Moller SE, Andreasen J, and Christensen NJ. Effects of ordinary meals on plasma concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, dopamine sulphate and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. Clin Sci (Lond) 92: 423–430, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.de Jong WH, Eisenhofer G, Post WJ, Muskiet FA, de Vries EG, and Kema IP. Dietary influences on plasma and urinary metanephrines: implications for diagnosis of catecholamine-producing tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 2841–2849, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Goldfien A, Moore R, Zileli S, Havens LL, Boling L, and Thorn GW. Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 21: 296–304, 1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.Brodows RG, Pi-Sunyer FX, and Campbell RG. Neural control of counter-regulatory events during glucopenia in man. J Clin Invest 52: 1841–1844, 1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Christensen NJ, Alberti KG, and Brandsborg O. Plasma catecholamines and blood substrate concentrations: studies in insulin induced hypoglycaemia and after adrenaline infusions. Eur J Clin Invest 5: 415–423, 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 502.Garber AJ, Cryer PE, Santiago JV, Haymond MW, Pagliara AS, and Kipnis DM. The role of adrenergic mechanisms in the substrate and hormonal response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in man. J Clin Invest 58: 7–15, 1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 503.Frolund L, Kehlet H, Christensen NJ, and Alberti KG. Effect of ketone body infusion on plasma catecholamine and substrate concentrations during acute hypoglycemia in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50: 557–559, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 504.Fagius J, and Berne C. Changes of sympathetic nerve activity induced by 2-deoxy-D-glucose infusion in humans. Am J Physiol 256: E714–720, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 505.Frandsen H, Berne C, Fagius J, Niklasson F, Christensen NJ, and Hilsted J. Plasma volume substitution does not inhibit plasma noradrenaline and muscle nerve sympathetic responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in healthy humans. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 49: 573–581, 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 506.Hoffman RP, Singer-Granick C, Drash AL, and Becker DJ. Plasma catecholamine responses to hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with IDDM. Diabetes Care 14: 81–88, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 507.Davis SN, Goldstein RE, Jacobs J, Price L, Wolfe R, and Cherrington AD. The effects of differing insulin levels on the hormonal and metabolic response to equivalent hypoglycemia in normal humans. Diabetes 42: 263–272, 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 508.Goldstein DS, and Frank SM. The wisdom of the body revisited: the adrenomedullary response to mild core hypothermia in humans. Endocr Regul 35: 3–7, 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 509.Robertson D, Haile V, Perry SE, Robertson RM, Phillips JA 3rd, and Biaggioni I. Dopamine beta-hydroxylase deficiency. A genetic disorder of cardiovascular regulation. Hypertension 18: 1–8, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 510.Ziegler MG, Lake CR, and Kopin IJ. Deficient sympathetic nervous response in familial dysautonomia. N Engl J Med 294: 630–633, 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 511.Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Martinez J, Axelrod F, and Kaufmann H. Hyperdopaminergic crises in familial dysautonomia: a randomized trial of carbidopa. Neurology 80: 1611–1617, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 512.Lenders JW, Keiser HR, Goldstein DS, Willemsen JJ, Friberg P, Jacobs MC, Kloppenborg PW, Thien T, and Eisenhofer G. Plasma metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med 123: 101–109, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 513.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Linehan WM, Walther MM, Goldstein DS, and Keiser HR. Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. N Engl J Med 340: 1872–1879, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 514.Tuchman M, Ramnaraine ML, Woods WG, and Krivit W. Three years of experience with random urinary homovanillic and vanillylmandelic acid levels in the diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Pediatrics 79: 203–205, 1987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 515.Strenger V, Kerbl R, Dornbusch HJ, Ladenstein R, Ambros PF, Ambros IM, and Urban C. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of urinary catecholamines in neuroblastoma patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48: 504–509, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 516.Chidsey CA, and Braunwald E. Sympathetic activity and neurotransmitter depletion in congestive heart failure. Pharmacol Rev 18: 685–700, 1966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 517.Sra JS, Murthy V, Natale A, Jazayeri MR, Dhala A, Deshpande S, Sheth M, and Akhtar M. Circulatory and catecholamine changes during head-up tilt testing in neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope. Am J Cardiol 73: 33–37, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 518.Kume T, Kawamoto T, Okura H, Toyota E, Neishi Y, Watanabe N, Hayashida A, Okahashi N, Yoshimura Y, Saito K, Nezuo S, Yamada R, and Yoshida K. Local release of catecholamines from the hearts of patients with tako-tsubo-like left ventricular dysfunction. Circ J 72: 106–108, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 519.S YH, Sorensson P, Ekenback C, Lundin M, Agewall S, Brolin EB, Caidahl K, Cederlund K, Collste O, Daniel M, Jensen J, Hofman-Bang C, Lynga P, Maret E, Sarkar N, Spaak J, Winnberg O, Ugander M, Tornvall P, and Henareh L. Plasma catecholamine levels in the acute and subacute stages of takotsubo syndrome: Results from the Stockholm myocardial infarction with normal coronaries 2 study. Clin Cardiol 44: 1567–1574, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 520.Vaz M, Jennings G, Turner A, Cox H, Lambert G, and Esler M. Regional sympathetic nervous activity and oxygen consumption in obese normotensive human subjects. Circulation 96: 3423–3429, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 521.Coppack SW, Horowitz JF, Paramore DS, Cryer PE, Royal HD, and Klein S. Whole body, adipose tissue, and forearm norepinephrine kinetics in lean and obese women. Am J Physiol 275: E830–834, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 522.Huggett RJ, Scott EM, Gilbey SG, Stoker JB, Mackintosh AF, and Mary DA. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on sympathetic neural mechanisms in hypertension. Circulation 108: 3097–3101, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 523.Christensen NJ, Dejgaard A, and Hilsted J. Plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) as an index of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clin Physiol 8: 577–580, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES