Skip to main content
Cell Research logoLink to Cell Research
. 2012 Mar 20;22(6):954–972. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.40

Laminin/β1 integrin signal triggers axon formation by promoting microtubule assembly and stabilization

Wen-Liang Lei 1, Shi-Ge Xing 2, Cai-Yun Deng 1, Xiang-Chun Ju 1, Xing-Yu Jiang 2, Zhen-Ge Luo 1,*
PMCID: PMC3367525  PMID: 22430151

Abstract

Axon specification during neuronal polarization is closely associated with increased microtubule stabilization in one of the neurites of unpolarized neuron, but how this increased microtubule stability is achieved is unclear. Here, we show that extracellular matrix (ECM) component laminin promotes neuronal polarization via regulating directional microtubule assembly through β1 integrin (Itgb1). Contact with laminin coated on culture substrate or polystyrene beads was sufficient for axon specification of undifferentiated neurites in cultured hippocampal neurons and cortical slices. Active Itgb1 was found to be concentrated in laminin-contacting neurites. Axon formation was promoted and abolished by enhancing and attenuating Itgb1 signaling, respectively. Interestingly, laminin contact promoted plus-end microtubule assembly in a manner that required Itgb1. Moreover, stabilizing microtubules partially prevented polarization defects caused by Itgb1 downregulation. Finally, genetic ablation of Itgb1 in dorsal telencephalic progenitors caused deficits in axon development of cortical pyramidal neurons. Thus, laminin/Itgb1 signaling plays an instructive role in axon initiation and growth, both in vitro and in vivo, through the regulation of microtubule assembly. This study has established a linkage between an extrinsic factor and intrinsic cytoskeletal dynamics during neuronal polarization.

Keywords: laminin, integrin, axon formation, microtubule assembly

Introduction

A typical neuron is comprised of a long axon and several short and highly arborized dendrites. This polarized structure is required for unidirectional information flow. It is generally believed that axon development requires cytoskeleton reorganization mediated by a number of signaling pathways 1, 2, 3. Actin dynamics at the growth cone is required for the axon growth 4, 5. It has been shown recently that microtubule stabilization induced by pharmacological treatments is sufficient to induce the axon formation 3, 6, and markedly increases axon regeneration after injury 7. Many cytoplasmic signaling molecules are involved in neuronal polarization and axon development 1, 2, 8, most of which have been identified in cultured hippocampal or cortical neurons, widely used model systems for the study of neuronal polarity 9, 10, 11. Among them, several kinases, including SAD A/B and LKB1, are essential for neuronal polarization in vivo8, 12, 13, 14. In contrast, the identity of the extracellular factors that initiate neuronal polarity in vivo is just beginning to be elucidated 15, 16. Furthermore, the linkage between extracellular cues and intracellular mediators remains largely unclear.

Cultured hippocampal neurons tend to form axons preferentially on the substrates coated with extracellular matrix (ECM) component laminin or neuron-glia cell adhesion molecule (NgCAM/L1) than on poly-ℒ-lysine 17, 18, suggesting that ECM or cell surface components may serve as extrinsic cues for neuronal polarization. A recent report shows that laminin contact correlates with the emergence of oriented axon of retinal ganglion cells in the zebrafish larvae 16. Isoforms of laminin are expressed in the developing rodent brain, some of which may be present in ventricular and subventricular zone where cortical neurons become polarized 19. Among laminin receptors, integrin family of heterodimeric cell adhesion molecules are involved in initial neuritogenesis 20, neurite outgrowth and regeneration 21, axon path finding 22, neuronal positioning 23, 24, 25, as well as synaptic development and plasticity 26. However, whether and how integrin-mediated cell adhesion is involved in neuronal polarization is unknown.

In this work, we have demonstrated that laminin/integrin interaction is indispensable for neuronal polarization both in vitro and in vivo. Laminin contact causes polarized activation of Itgb1 as well as axon initiation in isolated hippocampal neurons. Furthermore, laminin-induced axon initiation required Itgb1, and activation of Itgb1 directly by antibody cross-linking was sufficient to induce axon initiation. Interestingly, we found that laminin-contacting neurites of unpolarized neurons exhibited enhanced microtubule stability, which is known to enable axon initiation, and this microtubule stabilization required Itgb1. In support of the notion that Itgb1-dependent microtubule stabilization is critical for axon initiation, stabilizing microtubules by the taxol treatment compensated the deficit of axon formation due to Itgb1 downregulation. Notably, loss of Itgb1 resulted in a decrease in the level of phosphorylated LKB1 and SAD kinases, which are known to be critical for axon initiation in vivo. Thus, ECM/integrin signaling acts via intrinsic pathways to promote directional microtubule assembly and axon development.

Results

Itgb1 activation mediates axon formation on laminin substrates

Dissociated hippocampal neurons in culture spontaneously undergo axon/dendrite differentiation, even on an apparently uniform substrate 11. This process may be triggered by selective accumulation or activation of polarity determinants in the undifferentiated neurite 1, 2, 8. Interestingly, we found that the active Itgb1, as indicated by immunostaining with active form-specific antibodies (HUTS4) 27, colocalized with axon marker protein GAP-43 (growth-associated protein 43) in dissociated hippocampal neurons cultured on uniform laminin substrates (Supplementary information, Figure S1A and S1B). The role of Itgb1 in neuronal polarization was then examined by using loss- and gain-of-function approaches. First, we screened four siRNA sequences made against Itgb1 expression and found that two sequences (#2 and #3) were effective in downregulating the expression of endogenous Itgb1 in rat cortical neurons and human HEK293 cells, whereas #4 was only able to downregulate rat Itgb1 (Figure 1A). In cultured hippocampal neurons, downregulating the expression of Itgb1 by #3 and #4 siRNA decreased the percentage of neurons with a single axon (SA) and increased those with no axon (NA), whereas corresponding scrambled sequence had no effect on axon formation (Figure 1B and 1C). The effect of #4 siRNA on these rat neurons was prevented by co-transfection with #4 siRNA-resistant human Itgb1 (h-Itgb1) (Figure 1B and 1C). The role of Itgb1 was further determined by treating hippocampal neurons with Itgb1 function-blocking antibody, P5D2 or HM β1-1 28, 29, 30. We found that blocking Itgb1 activity decreased SA neurons and increased NA neurons (Supplementary information, Figure S2). Thus, Itgb1 signaling is required for axon formation in these cultured neurons. Next, we treated cultured hippocampal neurons with 9EG7 antibody to induce the cross-linking and activation of Itgb1 31. In contrast to blocking antibodies, 9EG7 treatment led to an increase in the percentage of neurons bearing either SA or multiple axons (MA) (Figure 1D) and in the average axon length (Figure 1E). We also analyzed whether modulating Itgb1 signals had any effect on other neurites, which are destined to become dendrites. Interestingly, the above treatments had no effect on either total neurite number or length of minor neurites (Supplementary information, Figure S3). Thus, Itgb1 activation is both necessary for axon development on laminin substrate and by itself is sufficient to increase axon formation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Itgb1 is required for laminin-induced axon initiation. (A) HEK293 cells or cultured rat cortical neurons were transfected with pSUPER vector or pSUPER encoding siRNAs against Itgb1 (#1, 2, 3, or 4) or scrambled sequence. Protein levels of Itgb1 were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB), with β-actin as loading control. Note that #2 and 3 were effective in downregulating Itgb1 in rat primary neurons and HEK293 cells, whereas # 4 had no effect on Itgb1 in HEK293 cells. Thus, human Itgb1 (h-Itgb1) was used for the following rescue experiment. (B) Dissociated hippocampal neurons were transfected with pSUPER vector or pSUPER encoding Itgb1 siRNA or scrambled sequence or Itgb1 siRNA plus human Itgb1 expression construct. Transfected neurons were marked by EGFP and stained with axonal marker Smi-312. Cells were cultured on laminin substrate. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Quantification for neuronal polarity. Transfected neurons were classified into three categories: neurons with short neurites in similar length but without axon (NA), neurons with one process that was positive for Smi-312, and over 100 μm and at least twice as long as the second longest process (SA), and neurons with two or more processes positive for Smi-312 and >100 μm and twice as long as other neurites (MA). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 300 neurons from six experiments. **P< 0.01. (D, E) Hippocampal neurons at DIV1 were treated with Itgb1-linking antibody 9EG7 or vehicle control for 48 h. Neuronal polarity (D) and axonal length (E) were quantitatively analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of 150 neurons from three experiments. Axonal length of control group was normalized as 1.0. **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001. (F) Hippocampal neurons transfected with EGFP were cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes. After 12 h, cultures were stained with HUTS4 antibody to label active Itgb1. Laminin stripes were marked by Alexa647-conjugated BSA signals. (G) HUTS4 intensity against EGFP was quantified in the on-stripe and off-stripe neurites with average value of off-stripe normalized as 1. *P< 0.05. (H) Hippocampal neurons were transfected with pSUPER constructs encoding Itgb1 siRNA or scrambled sequence (Ctrl), and cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes (blue) and PDL. After 48 h, cultures were stained with Smi-312 antibody. The laminin stripes were visualized by BSA-Alexa647 mixed in the laminin solution during coating. Scale bar, 20 μm. (I) Preference index (PI, defined as [(% on stripe)−(% off stripe)]/100%) was analyzed to reflect the preference of axon initiation sites to different substrates for neurons without or with Itgb1 downregulation (see Supplementary information, Figure S4 for details of the analysis).

Previous studies have shown that neurites of cultured hippocampal neurons tend to differentiate into axons when contacting laminin stripes or facing an increasing laminin gradient coated on the substrate 17, 18. We found that in most cases, the on-stripe neurites of unpolarized neurons exhibited higher immunostaining for active Itgb1 (Figure 1F and 1G). In agreement with the previous report 18, the majority of axon tips of polarized neurons in 48-h cultures were located on the laminin stripes (Figure 1H and Supplementary information, Figure S4B). To distinguish the effect of laminin stripe on axon differentiation from that on the guidance of axon growth, we analyzed the initiation site of axons for all neurons with the soma located at the stripe boundary (see Supplementary information, Figure S4A for the analysis method). Since the location of the initiation site remained unchanged during the 48 h in culture, this analysis allows us to determine retrospectively the effect of the stripe on the axon differentiation of the neurite 14. Notably, more axon differentiation was observed for neurites on the laminin stripe than off the stripe, whereas this preference for axon differentiation was not found for stripes coated with collagen or fibronectin, two other ECM components expressed in the pia surface but not within CNS 19 (Figure 1H and 1I; Supplementary information, Figures S4B and S5B). Furthermore, the effect of laminin stripes on axon differentiation was absent in neurons that expressed #3 siRNA against Itgb1 (Figure 1H and 1I; Supplementary information, Figure S4B) or treated with Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies (Supplementary information, Figure S5). The effects of substrate stripes on axon initiation site from the soma were quantified by the preference index (Figure 1I and Supplementary information, Figure S5B).

Patterned laminin and Itgb1 are necessary for oriented axon formation in cultured cortical slices

The existence of extracellular cues for neuronal polarization and axon/dendrite growth in vivo was shown by a slice overlay assay, in which fluorescently labeled dissociated cortical neurons plated onto the cortical slices exhibit the tendency of axon growth towards ventricular zone (VZ) 32. Given the high level of Itgb1 and laminin in the ventricular and subventricular regions 19, we have examined whether laminin is important for directional axon growth in this assay. Dissociated cortical neurons were transfected with GFP and plated onto cortical slices from P0 rats and cultured for 48 h. We found that the majority of cells (∼75%) extended an axon that was oriented radially toward the VZ, as reflected by the angular distribution of both the initiation site on the soma and the location of axon tips relative to the center of the soma at 48 h (with 0 to +90° defined as ventricular direction and 0 to −90° as pia direction) (Figure 2A, 2C and 2D). This radially oriented axon growth is consistent with the previous report 32. However, when cortical slices were pre-incubated with a high concentration of exogenous laminin, axons of overlaid neurons initiated from the soma at random angles, and their axon tip locations also showed no directional preference (Figure 2A, 2C and 2D). This interference of axon initiation and growth orientation by exogenous laminin suggests that the endogenous laminin in the cortex may serve as the extrinsic cue for axon formation and growth. Furthermore, similar loss of preferential axon initiation and growth was found for cortical neurons that were transfected with #3 siRNA against Itgb1 before plating (Figure 2B-2D), indicating that Itgb1 mediates the directional axon initiation and growth in this overlay assay.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Patterned laminin determines directional axon growth in Itgb1-dependent manner. (A-D) Isolated cortical neurons were transfected with pSUPER plasmids (A) or plasmids encoding Itgb1 siRNA or scrambled sequence (B), and plated onto coronal cortical slices from P0 rats. Under some circumstances, slices were pretreated without or with exogenous laminin (100 μg/ml) to perturb endogenous laminin patterns (A). After culturing for 48 h, morphology of overlayed neurons was traced (A and B, right panels) and directions of axonal extension were analyzed (C, D). Angles of the axon initiation (C) or turning (D) varied from +90° to −90°, with the positive or negative value, indicating that the axon was initiated or turned toward the ventricle or pia side of the cortical slices, respectively. Data shown are cumulative percentage plots for the distribution of axon initiation angles and axon turning angles for all sampled single-axon neurons (C, D). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P< 0.001, control vs Itgb1 siRNA; P< 0.001, control vs exogenous laminin; n = 40 for all experimental groups). Scale bars, 20 μm. (E) Surface-bound laminin gradient generated by diffusive printing method (see Materials and Methods for details). Laminin gradients were ascertained by immunostaining and fluorescent intensity profile was plotted. (F-H) Isolated hippocampal neurons were transfected with pSUPER plasmids that encodes control scrambled sequence or Itgb1 siRNA, and plated onto either IgG or laminin gradients. After 48 h, neurons were stained with Smi-312 antibody (F). Cumulative percentage of axon initiation and turning angles for all sampled single-axon neurons was plotted (G, H). Angles with positive value (0° to 90°) or negative value (−90° to 0°) indicate that the axon was initiated or turned toward the high- and low-density side of the gradient, respectively. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P< 0.001, IgG gradients vs laminin gradients; P< 0.001, Ctrl siRNA on laminin vs Itgb1 siRNA on laminin; n = 40 for all experimental groups).

Next, we generated a gradient of bound laminin using diffusive printing method 33, 34 to mimic the potential cortical distribution of laminin 19. As shown in Figure 2E, the bound laminin gradient was confirmed by immunostaining with anti-laminin antibody. Dissociated hippocampal neurons were transfected with #3 siRNA or scrambled siRNA before they were plated onto the bound laminin gradient. After culturing for 48 h, the initiation site of axon on the soma and the location of the axon tip relative to the center of the soma were analyzed to determine the effect of laminin gradient on axon initiation and growth orientation. We found that the majority (∼80%) of control (scramble siRNA-transfected) neurons showed axon initiation and growth cone orientation towards the side of high-level laminin (Figure 2F-2H). In contrast, no initiation or growth orientation was found when neurons were plated on a gradient of bound IgG or were transfected with #3 siRNA against Itgb1 (Figure 2F-2H) or were treated with Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies (Supplementary information, Figure S6). Thus, Itgb1 mediates axon initiation and growth orientation on a substrate with bound laminin gradient.

Laminin contact is sufficient to orient axon formation via Itgb1 in cultured cortical slices

Having determined the essential role of laminin/Itgb1 signaling in axon initiation and growth in cultured neurons, we next investigated whether laminin contact is sufficient to trigger axon formation within the neural tissue environment and whether the effect requires Itgb1. For this purpose, we applied polystyrene beads pre-coated with laminin or a control protein (IgG) to cultured brain slices prepared at P2 from different types of mice (Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/+) electroporated with pCAG-IRES-EGFP either alone (control) or together with Cre-containing plasmid at E15.5. After 48 h, the identity and length of bead-contacting processes were analyzed. Thin and tapered processes emerging from the soma were considered as axon- and dendrite-like, respectively. We found that, in comparison with IgG beads, significantly more laminin beads were found to be associated with axon-like processes in slices from both Itgb1f/f (control) and Itgb1f/+-Cremice (Figure 3A, 3B and 3E). Importantly, laminin bead-contacting processes were much more likely to exhibit axon-like morphology in both Itgb1f/f and Itgb1f/+-Cre mice (Figure 3A-3C, 3F). Furthermore, this association of laminin beads with axon-like processes was not observed in brain slices from Itgb1f/f-Cremice (Figure 3D-3F). These results support the notion that laminin-induced axon formation was impaired when Itgb1 was fully eliminated in the neuron. In addition, processes contacted by laminin-coated beads were significantly longer than those contacted by IgG beads in Itgb1f/f and Itgblf/+-Cre slices, but not in slices from Itgb1-eliminated (Itgb1f/f-Cre) mice (Figure 3G). Thus, laminin contact is sufficient to promote axon differentiation and growth in the brain tissue in an Itgb1-dependent manner.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The oriented axon initiation is directed by laminin/Itgb1 signaling in slice culture environment. (A-D) E15.5 mice were subjected to in utero electroporation with pCAG-IRES-GFP plasmid together with vehicle plasmid or plasmid encoding Cre. Brain slices from electroporated mice were implanted with laminin- or IgG-coated beads (indicated by pseudocolored yellow). Cell layers were displayed by DAPI labeling. Shown are example images from different treatment groups. (E) Quantitative analysis for the percentage of beads associated with axon-like processes. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. At least 538 beads were analyzed for each sample per experiment. *P< 0.05. (F, G) Quantitative analysis for the percentage of axon-like neurites (F) or average length of beads-contacting neurites (G). At least 216 neurites were analyzed for each group per experiment. **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001, N.S., no significant difference. Scale bars, 10 μm.

Itgb1 regulation of neuronal polarity proteins

We next investigated the mechanism of Itgb1 action by detecting levels or states of neuronal polarity-associated proteins in Itgb1 cKO mice (Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre), which restricted Itgb1 deletion in dorsal telencephalic progenitors 37, 38. First, we determined the state of integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which has been shown to be involved in axon development of cultured hippocampal neurons 49. Surprisingly, we found a marked increase in the steady-state level of ILK and phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) at S473, the consensus phosphorylation site by ILK 50, in the cortex of Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice (Supplementary information, Figure S7). The upregulation of ILK may reflect homeostatic intracellular responses to the loss of Itgb1. Next, we determined states of LKB1 and SAD kinases, which are known to be essential for axon formation both in vitro and in vivo12, 13, 14. Interestingly, we found that the levels of SAD kinases and phosphorylated LKB1 (pLKB1) at S431, an active form of LKB1, were markedly decreased in the hippocampus or cortex of Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice (Figure 4A). In line with this observation, we found that the level of phosphorylated Tau (pTau) at S262, the consensus phosphorylation site by SAD kinases 13, was decreased in these Itgb1-deletion mice (Figure 4A). Thus, Itgb1 plays an important role in maintaining the levels or activity of polarity proteins as well as the steady-state phosphorylation of a microtubule-associated protein. To further determine the relationship between Itgb1 and these polarity proteins, we knocked down Itgb1 by siRNAs. As shown in Figure 4B, the levels of pTau (S262), pLKB1 (S431), or SAD kinases were all reduced in cultured cortical neurons that were transfected with #4 siRNA against Itgb1, as compared to control neurons transfected with scrambled siRNA. This reduction was prevented in neurons co-transfected with #4 siRNA-resistant h-Itgb1, indicating the specificity of siRNA in downregulation of Itgb1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Loss of Itgb1 affects LKB1/SAD kinase pathway. (A) Homogenates of hippocampus or cortex from littermate P0 mice with indicated genotypes were subjected to IB with indicated antibodies. (B) Isolated cortical neurons were transfected with pSUPER plasmid or plasmids encoding Itgb1 #4 siRNA or #4 siRNA plus the siRNA-resistant h-Itgb1 before plating on laminin substrates. Cell lysates were subjected to IB with indicated antibodies. Blots shown are representatives of three independent experiments. (C) Isolated hippocampal neurons were transfected with plasmids encoding scrambled sequence or Itgb1 siRNA or Itgb1 siRNA plus SAD A/B kinase expression constructs and plated on laminin substrates. Neuronal polarity was analyzed at DIV3. Shown are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments (n = 120 for all experimental groups). *P< 0.05.

The relationship between Itgb1 and SAD kinases in regulating axon development was further examined by co-transfecting constructs encoding SAD kinases and siRNA against Itgb1 into cultured hippocampal neurons. Interestingly, the failure of axon development caused by Itgb1 downregulation was largely prevented by co-transfection with SAD kinases (Figure 4C). This supports the notion that the levels or activity of SAD kinases are downstream of the action of Itgb1 during axon development.

Laminin/Itgb1 signaling promotes MT assembly during axon formation

Preferential microtubule stabilization in an undifferentiated neurite is sufficient to induce axon differentiation 3. Furthermore, SAD kinases are believed to mediate axon formation by regulating microtubule-associated protein Tau 3, 13. Our finding of Itgb1 regulation of SAD kinases prompted us to investigate the role of laminin/Itgb1 signaling in regulating microtubule (MT) assembly. Given that localized contact with laminin promoted axon development, we therefore assessed microtubule stability in the neurites of unpolarized neurons, when they were “on” or “off” laminin stripes during the first day in culture. The MT stability was determined by immunostaining of acetylated and tyrosinated α-tubulin, which mark stable and dynamic MTs, respectively 51. We found that the on-stripe neurite exhibited a significantly higher ratio of acetylated to tyrosinated MTs (A/T ratio), as compared to that of off-stripe neurites (Figure 5A, top row, and 5B). Interestingly, downregulation of Itgb1 expression with #4 siRNAs prevented preferential MT stabilization, as reflected by similar A/T ratio for on- and off-stripe neurites (Figure 5A, middle row, and 5B). Thus, contact with laminin induces preferential MT stability, a process that requires Itgb1. The specificity of the siRNA effect was shown by the finding that co-transfection of siRNA-resistant h-Itgb1 with #4 siRNA restored the high A/T ratio in on-stripe neurites (Figure 5A, bottom row, and 5B). Thus, laminin/Itgb1 signaling induces MT stabilization, a process capable of triggering axon formation in hippocampal neurons 3.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Itgb1 is essential for laminin-induced microtubule stabilization and assembly during neuronal polarization. (A) Isolated hippocampal neurons were transfected with indicated plasmid combinations (scrambled siRNA, Itgb1 siRNA, or Itgb1 siRNA plus h-Itgb1) and cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes (blue). Transfected neurons at DIV2 were stained with antibodies against acetylated (Acet-, green) and tyrosinated (Tyr-, red) -α-tubulin. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Quantification for the ratio of Acet- to Tyr-Tubulin (A/T) for neurites on- (indicated by arrows) or off-stripes (indicated by arrowheads), with the value from on-stripe control neurites normalized as 1.0. Data are shown as mean ± SEM from three experiments. At least 30 neurites were analyzed for each group. ***P< 0.001, Student's t-test. (C) Hippocampal neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3, together with plasmids encoding scrambled siRNA or Itgb1 siRNA, were cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes. Scale bar, 10 μm. At DIV2, movement of individual EGFP-EB3 puncta was recorded using live-imaging fluorescence microscope. Shown are representative kymographs for on-stripe neurites (c1, c3) or off-stripe neurites (c2, c4), in neurons without or with Itgb1 downregulation. (D) Percentage of anterograde, retrograde, or immobile EGFP-EB3 comets, for neurites on- or off-laminin stripes, in neurons without or with Itgb1 downregulation. *P <0.05, **P< 0.01 vs control, ANOVA with Student's t-test. (E) Quantification for the velocity of EB3 puncta of indicated groups. *P < 0.05 vs control on-stripe.

The assembly of MTs involves polymerization at the plus end, which can be analyzed by visualizing the motion of plus end-binding proteins, such as EB1 or EB3 52. Hippocampal neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3 before plating on substrates coated with laminin stripes, and the trafficking of EGFP-EB3 puncta was monitored by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy for all neurons with the soma located at the stripe boundary (Figure 5C). We classified EB3 movements into three categories: retrograde (towards the soma), anterograde (away from the soma), and immobile. As shown by the kymographs in Figure 5C (also see Supplementary information, Movie S1), moving EB3 puncta were predominantly anterograde in on-stripe neurites (see c1), but not in off-stripe neurites (see c2). In addition, the average velocity of EB3 puncta was higher in on-stripe neurites than in off-stripe neurites (Figure 5E). These results suggest that contact with laminin results in preferential assembly of MTs with plus-end towards the distal end of the neurite. The role of Itgb1 in EB3 trafficking was further shown by the effect of downregulation of Itgb1 in these neurons. We found that transfection with Itgb1 siRNA caused a decrease in anterograde transport and an increase in retrograde transport of EB3 puncta in on-stripe neurites (Figure 5C and Supplementary information, Movie S2), with the velocity and the distribution of three categories of puncta indistinguishable from that of off-stripe neurites (Figure 5C-5E). Thus, Itgb1 is necessary for directional microtubule assembly induced by laminin.

MT stabilization prevents axon formation defects due to Itgb1 downregulation

Having determined the role of laminin/Itgb1 signaling in MT assembly in polarizing neurons, we next investigated whether MT stabilization itself may compensate the loss of axon formation due to Itgb1 downregulation. Axon formation in cultured hippocampal neurons is known to be promoted by manipulations of cytoskeletal structures using appropriate concentrations of actin filament depolymerizing drugs, such as 1 μM of cytochalasin D or latrunculin A 4, or MT-stabilizing drugs, such as 3-10 nM of taxol 3. We found that all these treatments increased the percentage of cultured hippocampal neurons bearing MA (Figure 6A, 6B and Supplementary information, Figure S8B). Interestingly, treatment with taxol (2 nM) partially rescued axon development that was impaired in neurons with Itgb1 downregulation (Figure 6A and 6B) or treated with Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies (Supplementary information, Figure S8A and S8B), but treatments with cytochalasin D or latrunculin A had no rescue effect. These results are consistent with the axon induction effect of MT-stabilizing drugs 3, and support the notion that MT stabilization mediates the axon promotion effect of laminin/Itgb1 signaling.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Taxol stabilization of microtubules partially prevents the loss of neuronal polarity caused by Itgb1 downregulation. (A) Hippocampal neurons were transfected with pSUPER plasmid encoding scrambled or Itgb1 siRNA, and then treated with cytochalasin D (1 μM), latrunculin A (1 μM), or taxol (2 nM) at DIV1 for 12 h. Shown are representative reconstructed images of EGFP-positive neurons from different groups. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Quantification for neuronal polarity. Note that treatments with cytochalasin D, latrunculin A, or taxol all increased the percentage of neurons with MA (***P< 0.001 vs control). Taxol treatment significantly increased the percentage of neurons with SA and MA in Itgb1 siRNA-transfected neurons (**P< 0.01, *P< 0.05, Itgb1 siRNA vs Itgb1 siRNA plus taxol).

Itgb1 is required for axon formation in cortical neurons in vivo

Global deletion of Itgb1 in mice results in lethality during early post-implantation 35, 36. We thus examined the effect of partial and complete elimination of Itgb1 in dorsal telencephalic progenitors by crossing the Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/+ mice 37 with the Emx1-Cre transgenic mice 38, respectively. As shown in Figure 4A, the Itgb1 protein level was markedly reduced in the cortex and hippocampus of the Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice compared to Itgb1f/+; Emx1-Cre mice. In agreement, the amount of phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (pFAK) at T397, an active form of FAK, was decreased in Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice (Supplementary information, Figure S7), suggesting the inhibition of integrin-mediated focal adhesion signaling. Consistent with previous reports of restricted Itgb1 elimination in post-mitotic neurons 23, 24, we found that both the cortex size and lamination were roughly normal in Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre or Itgb1f/+; Emx1-Cre mice (Supplementary information, Figure S9).

To determine whether loss of Itgb1 in cortical neurons causes axonal defect, we first implanted crystals of fluorescent lipid DiI (1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) into the cortex to trace cortical axons 39. In the control (Itgb1f/f) or Itgb1f/+; Emx1-Cre mice, we found that DiI-labelled corticofugal axons descended from the cortex and projected towards either external capsule (arrowheads in Figure 7A, see a2 and a4) or corpus callosum that crossed the midline (arrows in Figure 7A, see a1 and a3). However, these axon projections were severely affected in Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice. Due to the variability of DiI labeling, we also examined axon development by staining with antibody against TAG1, a cell adhesion molecule that marks corticofugal axons 41. As shown in Figure 7B, control mice at E18.5 show normal callosal axons crossing the midline (see b1) and lateral projection through the external capsule (see b2). Remarkably, the TAG1-positive signals were severely impaired in age-matched Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice (Figure 7B, see b3 and b4). We also analyzed axon development in E14.5 mice, when callosal axons have not formed. As shown in Supplementary information, Figure S10, while TAG1-positive axons were seen in the neocortex of control mice, these axons were barely detectable in E14.5 mutant mice. Of note, NgCAM/L1, another marker for corticofugal axons, was not affected in Itgb1 mutant mice (data not shown), probably due to unresponsiveness of another set of cortical neurons to Itgb1 manipulation. Nevertheless, the above results support the notion that Itgb1 signaling plays an important role in neocortical axon development in vivo.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Essential role of Itgb1 in axon development in vivo. (A) DiI crystals were placed in the somatosensory cortex of control (Itgb1f/f) or mutant mice (Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre or Itgb1f/+; Emx1-Cre) at P3. Coronal sections reveal descending tracts toward the corpus callosum (arrows) or internal capsule (arrowheads). Cell layers were displayed by DAPI labeling. The magnified images (10×) show axon fibers in medial (a1 and a3) and lateral (a2 and a4) projections, respectively. (B) Cortical sections of control (Itgb1f/f) and Itgb1 mutant (Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre) mice at P0 were stained with antibody to TAG1. The magnified images (5×) at the bottom show axon fibers in corpus callosum (compare b1 and b3) and internal capsule (compare b2 and b4), respectively. Scale bars, 2 mm and 50 μm (insets) in A, 1 mm and 100 μm (insets) in B.

The above axon defects could result from the effect of Itgb1 gene deletion in radial glial cells, which are known to be affected in the Itgb1f/f; nestin-Cre mice 23, 24, 45, 46. We thus performed single cell gene elimination experiment by using in utero electroporation method at E15.5 47. The Itgb1f/+ and Itgb1f/f mice were electroporated with Cre-containing plasmid (pTurbo-Cre) together with pCAG-IRES-EGFP as neuronal marker (termed “Itgb1f/+-Cre” and “Itgb1f/f-Cre”), and the Itgb1f/f mice electroporated with pCAG-IRES-EGFP alone was used as the control. After electroporation, coronal sections of the cortex at P3 were analyzed for neuronal morphology. We found that majority of cortical neurons transfected with the control vector pCAG-IRES-EGFP migrated to upper layers and exhibited normal axon projection toward the ventricular surface (Figure 8A, top row). Given that laminin/integrin signaling may act during neurogenesis to provide the stem cell niche 48, we only analyzed morphology of neurons that already reached the cortical plate at P3 and exhibited positive staining for neuronal marker Tuj1 (Supplementary information, Figure S11). We found that ablation of Itgb1 caused a marked reduction in the percentage of axon-bearing neurons, which had only short apical dendrite-like processes (Figure 8A, bottom row), confirming the importance of Itgb1 signaling in axon formation. Expression of Cre in Itgb1f/+ mice had no effect on neuronal polarization (Figure 8A, middle row), excluding the potential toxic effect caused by Cre expression. Furthermore, staining with radial glia-specific marker RC2 showed roughly normal radial glial networks in all experimental groups (Figure 8A, lane 3), suggesting that the impairment of axon formation caused by Itgb1 gene deletion in Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice was due to a cell autonomous mechanism.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Cell autonomous role of Itgb1 in axon initiation in vivo. (A) Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/+ mice at E15.5 were subjected to in utero electroporation with pCAG-IRES-GFP plasmid together with vehicle plasmid or plasmid encoding Cre. Cortical sections from P3 mice were stained with antibody against radial glia marker RC2 and cell layers were marked by DAPI labeling. Right lane images show single cell morphology. (B) Quantification for the percentage of polarized neurons in the cortical plate with a long thin descending axon (n = 80 for all groups). Scale bars, 100 μm (left four lanes) or 10 μm (right lane). *P< 0.05.

Discussion

ECM protein laminin is known to promote axon development of cultured neurons 1, 17, 18, but the linkage between the laminin signaling and the known intracellular mechanisms underlying axon formation has not been established. Here we report that laminin's action in promoting axon development is mediated by MT stabilization in undifferentiated neurite triggered by laminin/Itgb1 signaling. Furthermore, we examined the role of Itgb1 in vivo, and found that Itgb1 conditional knockout mice exhibited severe defects in axon development of a subset of cortical neurons, and abnormal expression or activity of neuronal polarity proteins, including SAD and LKB1 kinases. Furthermore, we demonstrated that laminin/Itgb1 signaling promotes MT stabilization, as indicated by the A/T α-tubulin ratio and anterograde transport of EB3. Pharmacological enhancement of MT stabilization partially rescued the axon development in Itgb1-downregulated neurons. Thus, we have demonstrated a laminin/Itgb1-dependent cytoskeletal mechanism for promoting neuronal polarization.

Essential role of laminin/integrin signaling in axon formation

Undifferentiated neurites of cultured hippocampal or cortical neurons showed higher probability of axon differentiation when they are in contact with laminin-coated stripes 18. The integrin α6β1 heterodimer is expressed at a high level in the apical region of VZ 19. Laminins, which serve as ECM ligands for integrins, are also present in the VZ 19. The following lines of evidence support the essential role of laminin/integrin signaling in establishing neuronal polarity: First, laminin-coated substrates, in either stripes or in a gradient, or laminin-coated beads could specify axon initiation site from the soma in an Itgb1-dependent manner (Figures 1-3). Second, disrupting the action of endogenous laminin by supplying exogenous laminin or downregulating Itgb1 by specific treatments with siRNAs abolished directional axon extension in a slice overlay assay (Figure 2). Third, ablation of the Itgb1 gene or downregulation of Itgb1 signaling in cortical neurons resulted in defects in axon formation and neuronal polarity in vivo (Figures 7 and 8) and the loss of responsiveness of cortical neurons towards axon induction by laminin-coated beads (Figure 3). Finally, Itgb1 activation by antibody cross-linking was sufficient to induce the formation of MA and promotion of axon growth in hippocampal cultures (Figure 1D and 1E).

A recent report shows that the laminin/integrin signaling is necessary for maintaining neocortical stem cell niche and the orientation of neural stem cell division 48. Thus, neuroepithelial cell polarity may be causally related to postmitotic neuron polarity 2, i.e., postmitotic neurons directly inherit the intrinsic apico-basal polarity of their progenitors, which are determined by laminin/integrin signaling. The relative importance of laminin/integrin signaling in polarity formation before and after last mitotic division remains to be further studied.

Laminin/Itgb1 signaling and neuronal polarity proteins

Many polarity proteins involved in apico-basal polarity of neuroepithelial progenitors in the neocortex, e.g., those in the apical polarity complex aPKC/Par3/Par6, and Cdc42 53, 54, 55, are also required for axon specification 56, 57. The relationship between integrin signaling with some of these polarity proteins has been established in astrocyte polarization and migration 58 – the interaction of integrins with ECM at the newly formed cell front leads to the activation and polarized recruitment of Cdc42, which in turn recruits and activates the cytoplasmic mPar6/PKCζ complex, which further modifies MT cytoskeleton. In this study, we found that the loss of Itgb1 caused inactivation of the Par4 homolog LKB1 and downregulation of Par1 homolog kinases SAD-A and B, all of which are necessary for axon formation in vivo 12, 13, 14. Furthermore, overexpression of SAD-A and B was found to partially compensate the loss of axon formation due to downregulation of Itgb1. The partial effect may be attributed to involvement of other polarity proteins in mediating laminin/Itgb1 signaling. Alternatively, the level or distribution of overexpressed SAD-A/B was not optimal for compensating the laminin/Itgb1 signaling.

How might laminin/integrin regulate LKB1 or SAD kinases? Our results show that the loss of Itgb1 caused a decrease in the phosphorylation of LKB1 at Ser 431, a consensus site for cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), and the level of SAD-A/B (Figure 4). In line with this finding, a previous report shows that integrin α4 cytoplasmic domain acts as a type I PKA-specific kinase-anchoring protein (AKAP), which controls the localization and substrate specificity of PKA 59. Thus, laminin/integrin signaling may regulate PKA-dependent phosphorylation of LKB1 via recruitment or activation of AKAP, and phosphorylated LKB1 further exerts its kinase action on the activity or stability of SAD kinases.

Laminin/integrin signaling in microtubule assembly

Integrin signaling has been proposed to reorganize cytoskeletal structure in non-neuronal cells. For example, integrin-mediated activation of focal adhesion kinase at the leading edge of mouse fibroblasts is required for MT stabilization by the Rho signaling pathway 58. During cell mitosis, integrin-mediated adhesion also orients the spindle parallel to the substratum, a process requiring F-actin and astral MTs 60. Furthermore, perturbing Itgb1 function inhibits MT growth from centrosomes and the assembly of the mitotic spindle during cytokinesis 61. In this study, we found that contact with laminin-coated substrate caused stabilization of MT assembly and elevated anterograde transport of plus-end binding protein EB3 (Figure 5), both of which are likely to promote axon initiation and growth. These results establish a direct linkage between ECM-mediated adhesion and cytoskeleton remodeling, and the function of this linkage in axon formation.

In addition to the ECM, a number of extracellular axon-promoting factors have been identified, such as netrin 62, BDNF 14, Sema3a 63, Wnt 57, and TGFβ 15. Some of these factors interact with integrin signaling during cell proliferation 64, adhesion and migration 65, 66, 67, neurite outgrowth, and growth cone guidance 68, 69, 70. It is thus possible that other extracellular cues execute their roles through modulating integrin signaling directly or indirectly. Thus, the mechanism of laminin/Itgb1-triggered MT assembly and stability may also be relevant for neuronal polarization induced by other factors that interact with integrins.

Materials and Methods

Reagents, antibodies and constructs

Substrates coated on coverslips or culture dishes, including poly-𝒟-lysine hydrobromide, collagen, fibronectin, and laminin were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugated with AlexaFluor 488/555/647 was used to visualize substrate stripes and surface-bound protein gradients and purchased from Invitrogen. Cytochalasin D, latrunculin A, and paclitaxel (taxol) were from Sigma Aldrich. Antibodies used for immunostaining were: rabbit anti-GFP from Invitrogen; rat anti-GAP43 from Calbiochem; mouse anti-Smi312 from Covance; rabbit anti-β2 laminin and rabbit anti-Cux1 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; mouse anti-acetylated tubulin and mouse anti-β-tubulin III (Tuj1) from Sigma Aldrich; mouse anti-Itgb1 (HUTS4), mouse anti-RC2, and rabbit anti-MAP2 from Merck Millipore; mouse anti-L1, rat anti-tyrosinated tubulin (YL1/2), rabbit anti-TAG1, and rabbit anti-Tbr1 from Abcam. Antibodies used for western blot were: rat anti-Itgb1 from R&D Systems; rabbit anti-FAK from Abcam; rabbit anti-pTau (S262) from Biosource; mouse anti-Tau from Calbiochem; rabbit anti-pLKB1 (S431) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; mouse anti-LKB1 from Upstate; mouse anti-ILK from BD Pharmingen; mouse anti-GAPDH from KangChen; mouse anti-pAKT (S473) and rabbit anti-AKT from Cell Signaling Technology; mouse anti-β-actin and rabbit anti-pFAK (T397) from Merck Millipore. Polyclonal antibodies against SAD-A and SAD-B were generated in our laboratory. Antibody used to activate Itgb1 (9EG7) was from BD Pharmingen. Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies were from Abcam (P5D2) and BD Pharmingen (HM β1-1). To generate pSUPER-encoded siRNAs, double-stranded oligonucleotides encoding Itgb1 siRNA were subcloned into BglII- and HindIII-digested pSUPER (OligoEngine, Seattle, WA, USA). The siRNA sequences against Itgb1 were: #1, 5′-CCAGAGGCTCTCAAACTATTT-3′ (sense) and 5′-ATAGTTTGAGAGCCTCTGGTT-3′ (anti-sense); #2, 5′-GGAGGATTACTTCAGACTTTT-3′ (sense) and 5′-AAGTCTGAAGTAATCCTCCTT-3′ (antisense); #3, 5′-CCAGACGGAGTAACAATAATT-3′ (sense) and 5′-TTATTGTTACTCCGTCTGGTT-3′ (antisense); #4, 5′-CCAAATAAGGAGTCTGAAATT-3′ (sense) and 5′-TTTCAGACTCCTTATTTGGTT-3′ (antisense). All the oligonucleotides were synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The human Itgb1 construct was a gift from Dr Mara Brancaccio (University of Torino, Italy).

Neuronal culture, electroporation and treatments

Dissociated hippocampal neurons were prepared as described previously 54. Briefly, hippocampi from E18 rat embryos were digested with 0.125% trypsin-EDTA for 20 min at 37 °C, followed by trituration with pipettes in the plating medium (DMEM with 10% FBS and 10% F12). Dissociated neurons were transfected by electroporation using the Amaxa Nucleofector device. In some experiments, testing plasmids were cotransfected with pEGFP at a ratio of 4:1. Control and transfected neurons were plated onto coverslips coated with poly-𝒟-lysine (0.1 mg/ml) without or with laminin stripes. After culturing for 24 h, media were changed into neuronal culture media (neurobasal media containing 1% glutamate and 2% B27). Sometimes, neurons at DIV 1 were treated with cytoskeleton-manipulating drugs or Itgb1 activation or function-blocking antibodies at following concentrations: cytochalasin D (1 μM), latrunculin A (1 μM), taxol (2 nM), 9EG7 (2 μg/ml), P5D2 (25 μg/ml), HM β1-1 (10 μg/ml).

Immunostaining

Neurons were first washed with PBS, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min, and incubated with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. After blocking with 10% goat serum in PBS at room temperature for 1 h or 4 °C overnight, neurons were incubated in primary antibodies at 4 °C for more than 12 h and subsequently with Alexa Fluor 350-, 488-, 555-, 647-, CY2-, CY3-, CY5, FITC- or rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibodies. Coverslips were mounted with fluorescent mounting medium from Dako and examined under a Nikon Neurolucida system, a Zeiss confocal microscope or a Nikon confocal microscope.

For mouse brain tissues, coronal cryostat sections of 30 μm were cut with a freezing microtome and immediately processed for immunostaining by a free-floating protocol (at 4 °C). Briefly, brain slices, after treatment with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 10% goat serum in PBS for 1 h, were incubated in primary antibodies for 24 h, followed by 3× washes with PBS, incubation with biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies, and finally in CY2- or CY3-conjugated streptavidin before observation.

In utero electroporation

In utero electroporation was performed as described previously 47. Briefly, 1-2 μg plasmid mixed with Fast Green (Amresco) was injected into the lateral ventricle of the embryonic brains, which were then subjected to electroporation consisting of five square wave pulses with an amplitude of 35 v (for mice) or 55 v (for rats), a duration of 100 ms, an interval of 1s (ECM830; BTX).

Stripe coating assay

Poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds were fabricated as described previously 71, with a patterned parallel stripes of 80 μm width separated by 120 μm gaps. Briefly, PDMS molds were inversely pressed onto poly-𝒟-lysine-coated glass coverslips, and microchannels formed between the PDMS molds and coverslips were used for microfluidic patterning of individual substrates (0.1 mg/ml collagen, fibronectin or 0.05 mg/ml laminin, mixed with 5 μg/ml of fluorescence-conjugated BSA, respectively), which were driven through the microchannels by a vacuum. Substrate solutions were incubated in the microchannels overnight, and PDMS molds were removed, leaving the adsorbed substrates stripes on the glass microscope slides for cell plating.

Diffusive printing assay

Diffusive printing assay was performed to generate bound substrate gradient as described previously 34 with some modifications. Briefly, silicon molds with parallel grooves, each 350 μm in width, 100 μm in depth, and 4 mm apart, were designed and produced by using standard photolithography. Afterwards, liquid PDMS was poured onto the silicon molds, resulting in the formation of PDMS molds with paralleled ridges, which were then vapor-coated to make the surface hydrophobic. Next, certain amount of autoclaved 5% agarose dissolved in PBS was poured onto sterilized PDMS molds, and solidified agarose gel was detached and cut into 18 × 18 mm stamps, with each containing four channels at the bottom. The agarose stamps were then placed on top of epoxy coverslips (Arrayit SuperEpoxy 2.5 × 1012 reactive group/mm2) coated with 0.1 mg/ml PDL, and the laminin substrate solutions (0.05 mg/ml) were added into the microchannels between the agarose stamps and the coverslips to make diffusive gradient perpendicular to the channels. After 20 min diffusion, the agarose stamps were removed, and coverslips were air-dried at room temperature for about 30 min until being rinsed with PBS. These coverslips with bound substrate gradients were ready for cell plating.

Brain slice overlay assay

Brain slice overlay assay was performed by following the methods described previously 72, 73. Briefly, coronal sections (300 μm) of neonatal rat cerebral cortex were cultured on the culture plate inserts (Millipore), in MEM culture medium with Glutamax-1, containing 23% EBSS, 6.5 mg/ml D-glucose, 0.06% Nystatin, 25% horse serum, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. After transfection, dissociated hippocampal neurons from E18.5 rats were plated onto cortical slices, and cultured for 2-3 days before morphology analysis.

Polystyrene beads embedding in brain slice culture

Laminin (Sigma) or normal mouse IgG (Millipore) proteins were covalently coupled to polystyrene beads (Polybead® Blue Dyed Microspheres, 6.0 μm, Polysciences) using Glutaraldehyde Kit (Polysciences). The Helios Gene Gun (Bio-Rad) was used to transport coated polystyrene beads into mouse brain slices (50 μm), with 100-120 psi pressure and 20-30 mm distance between the gun barrel and the targets. After beads embedding, the brain slices were cultured on sterilized culture plate inserts (Millipore) for 2-3 days before morphology analysis.

Live cell imaging

Dissociated neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3 together with individual siRNA construct, and plated on coverslips coated with laminin stripes. At DIV2 or DIV3, immediately before image capture, neurons were switched to the medium for live imaging (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, with 1.9 mg/ml glucose and 1.9 mg/ml albumin), and were warmed to 37 °C in CO2 chamber. Movement of EB3 puncta were observed for 15 min, with pictures taken at intervals of 1 s using Nikon Ti live-cell imaging microscope with Apo TIRF 100× object lens.

Conditioned knockout mice

The Floxed/Cre approach was used to generate Itgb1 conditioned knockout (CKO) mice. The B6; 129-Itgb1tm1Efu/J mice, which possess loxP sites on either side of exon 3 of the Itgb1 gene, were crossed with B6.129S2-Emx1tm1(cre)Krj/J mice, which expresses Cre recombinase from the endogenous Emx1 locus, resulting in the generation of Itgb1 CKO mice. Emx1-mediated recombination was supposed to occur in approximately 88% of the neurons in neocortex and hippocampus, and in the glial cells of the pallium, based on the expression pattern of endogenous Emx1 gene 38. All animal usage followed guidelines by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr MM Poo (Institute of Neuroscience, SIBS, CAS) for suggestions on this work and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program (2011CBA00403 to ZGL), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31021063 and 30825013 to ZGL, 21025520 to XYJ). We also thank Dr JF Chen (Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, SIBS, CAS) for providing reagents and Dr Q Hu of ION Imaging Facility with microscope analysis.

Footnotes

(Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Research website.)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information, Figure S1

Polarized activation of Itgb1 in cultured hippocampal neurons.

Supplementary information, Figure S2

Effects of Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies on axon development in cultured hippocampal neurons.

Supplementary information, Figure S3

Itgb1 is dispensable for the growth of minor neurites.

Supplementary information, Figure S4

Definition and angular distribution of axon-initiation sites.

Supplementary information, Figure S5

Effects of Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies on axon initiation on laminin-stripes.

Supplementary information, Figure S6

Effects of Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies on axon initiation and turning on laminin gradients.

Supplementary information, Figure S7

Homogenates of cortex from littermate P0 mice with indicated genotypes were subject to IB with indicated antibodies.

Supplementary information, Figure S8

Taxol stabilization of microtubules partially prevents the loss of neuronal polarity caused by Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies.

Supplementary information, Figure S9

Cortical sections from Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice at P20 were stained with antibody against Tbr1 (A) to mark layers II-IV and VI, or Cux1 (B) to mark layers II-III. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Supplementary information, Figure S10

Cortical sections of control (Itgb1f/f) or Itgb1 mutant (Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre) mice at E14.5 were stained with antibody against TAG1 or MAP2.

Supplementary information, Figure S11

Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/+ mice at E15.5 were subject to in utero electroporation with pCAG-IRES-GFP plasmid together with pTurbo-Cre.

Supplementary information, Movie S1

Hippocampal neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3, together with plasmids encoding scrambled siRNA, and then cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes. At DIV 2, movement of individual EGFP-EB3 puncta was recorded using live imaging fluorescence microscope.

Supplementary information, Movie S2

Hippocampal neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3, together with plasmids encoding Itgb1 siRNA, and cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes. At DIV2, movement of individual EGFP-EB3 puncta was recorded using live imaging fluorescence microscope.

References

  1. Arimura N, Kaibuchi K. Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:194–205. doi: 10.1038/nrn2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes AP, Polleux F. Establishment of axon-dendrite polarity in developing neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:347–381. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Witte H, Neukirchen D, Bradke F. Microtubule stabilization specifies initial neuronal polarization. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:619–632. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200707042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradke F, Dotti CG. The role of local actin instability in axon formation. Science. 1999;283:1931–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5409.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schwamborn JC, Püschel AW. The sequential activity of the GTPases Rap1B and Cdc42 determines neuronal polarity. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:923–929. doi: 10.1038/nn1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirai S, Banba Y, Satake T, Ohno S. Axon formation in neocortical neurons depends on stage-specific regulation of microtubule stability by the dual leucine zipper kinase-c-jun n-terminal kinase pathway. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6468–6480. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5038-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sengottuvel V, Leibinger M, Pfreimer M, Andreadaki A, Fischer D. Taxol facilitates axon regeneration in the mature CNS. J Neurosci. 2011;31:2688–2699. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4885-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnes AP, Solecki D, Polleux F. New insights into the molecular mechanisms specifying neuronal polarity in vivo. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008;18:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradke F, Dotti CG. Establishment of neuronal polarity: lessons from cultured hippocampal neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000;10:574–581. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Craig AM, Banker G. Neuronal polarity. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1994;17:267–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dotti CG, Sullivan CA, Banker GA. The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J Neurosci. 1988;8:1454–1468. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-04-01454.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barnes AP, Lilley BN, Pan YA, et al. LKB1 and SAD kinases define a pathway required for the polarization of cortical neurons. Cell. 2007;129:549–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kishi M, Pan YA, Crump JG, Sanes JR. Mammalian SAD kinases are required for neuronal polarization. Science. 2005;307:929–932. doi: 10.1126/science.1107403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shelly M, Cancedda L, Heilshorn S, Sumbre G, Poo MM. LKB1/STRAD promotes axon initiation during neuronal polarization. Cell. 2007;129:565–577. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yi JJ, Barnes AP, Hand R, Polleux F, Ehlers MD. TGF-beta signaling specifies axons during brain development. Cell. 2010;142:144–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Randlett O, Poggi L, Zolessi FR, Harris WA. The oriented emergence of axons from retinal ganglion cells is directed by laminin contact in vivo. Neuron. 2011;70:266–280. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dertinger SK, Jiang X, Li Z, Murthy VN, Whitesides GM. Gradients of substrate-bound laminin orient axonal specification of neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12542–12547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.192457199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Esch T, Lemmon V, Banker G. Local presentation of substrate molecules directs axon specification by cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:6417–6426. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-15-06417.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lathia JD, Patton B, Eckley DM, et al. Patterns of laminins and integrins in the embryonic ventricular zone of the CNS. J Comp Neurol. 2007;505:630–643. doi: 10.1002/cne.21520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gupton SL, Gertler FB. Integrin signaling switches the cytoskeletal and exocytic machinery that drives neuritogenesis. Dev Cell. 2010;18:725–736. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan CL, Kwok JC, Patani R, Ffrench-Constant C, Chandran S, Fawcett JW. Integrin activation promotes axon growth on inhibitory chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans by enhancing integrin signaling. J Neurosci. 2011;31:6289–6295. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0008-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robles E, Gomez TM. Focal adhesion kinase signaling at sites of integrin-mediated adhesion controls axon pathfinding. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1274–1283. doi: 10.1038/nn1762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Graus-Porta D, Blaess S, Senften M, et al. beta 1-class integrins regulate the development of laminae and folia in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Neuron. 2001;31:367–379. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00374-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Belvindrah R, Graus-Porta D, Goebbels S, Nave KA, Müller U. beta 1 integrins in radial glia but not in migrating neurons are essential for the formation of cell layers in the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27:13854–13865. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4494-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Belvindrah R, Hankel S, Walker J, Patton BL, Müller U. beta 1 integrins control the formation of cell chains in the adult rostral migratory stream. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2704–2717. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2991-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang Z, Shimazu K, Woo NH, et al. Distinct roles of the beta 1-class integrins at the developing and the mature hippocampal excitatory synapse. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11208–11219. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3526-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luque A, Gómez M, Puzon W, Takada Y, Sánchez-Madrid F, Carlos Cabañas. Activated conformations of very late activation integrins detected by a group of antibodies (HUTS) specific for a novel regulatory region (355-425) of the common beta 1 chain. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11067–11075. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Adams JC, Watt FM. Changes in keratinocyte adhesion during terminal differentiation: reduction in fibronectin binding precedes alpha 5 beta 1 integrin loss from the cell surface. Cell. 1990;63:425–435. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90175-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Carroll JM, Romero MR, Watt FM. Suprabasal integrin expression in the epidermis of transgenic mice results in developmental defects and a phenotype resembling psoriasis. Cell. 1995;83:957–968. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90211-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Noto K, Kato K, Okumura K, Yagita H. Identification and functional characterization of mouse CD29 with a mAb. Int Immunol. 1995;7:835–842. doi: 10.1093/intimm/7.5.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bazzoni G, Shih DT, Buck CA, Hemler ME. Monoclonal antibody 9EG7 defines a novel beta 1 integrin epitope induced by soluble ligand and manganese, but inhibited by calcium. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25570–25577. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Polleux F, Giger RJ, Ginty DD, Kolodkin AL, Ghosh A. Patterning of cortical efferent projections by semaphorin-neuropilin interactions. Science. 1998;282:1904–1906. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jiang X, Xu Q, Dertinger SK, Stroock AD, Fu TM, Whitesides GM. A general method for patterning gradients of biomolecules on surfaces using microfluidic networks. Anal Chem. 2005;77:2338–2347. doi: 10.1021/ac048440m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mai J, Fok L, Gao H, Zhang X, Poo MM. Axon initiation and growth cone turning on bound protein gradients. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7450–7458. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1121-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Almeida EA, Huovila AP, Sutherland AE, et al. Mouse egg integrin alpha 6 beta 1 functions as a sperm receptor. Cell. 1995;81:1095–1104. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fässler R, Meyer M. Consequences of lack of beta 1 integrin gene expression in mice. Genes Dev. 1995;9:1896–1908. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.15.1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Raghavan S, Bauer C, Mundschau G, Li Q, Fuchs E. Conditional ablation of beta1 integrin in skin. Severe defects in epidermal proliferation, basement membrane formation, and hair follicle invagination. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:1149–1160. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.5.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gorski JA, Talley T, Qiu M, Puelles L, Rubenstein JL, Jones KR. Cortical excitatory neurons and glia, but not GABAergic neurons, are produced in the Emx1-expressing lineage. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6309–6314. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06309.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Molnar Z, Adams R, Blakemore C. Mechanisms underlying the early establishment of thalamocortical connections in the rat. J Neurosci. 1998;18:5723–5745. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-15-05723.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kawano H, Fukuda T, Kubo K, et al. Pax-6 is required for thalamocortical pathway formation in fetal rats. J Comp Neurol. 1999;408:147–160. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990531)408:2<147::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fujimori KE, Takeuchi K, Yazaki T, Uyemura K, Nojyo Y, Tamamki N. Expression of L1 and TAG-1 in the corticospinal, callosal, and hippocampal commissural neurons in the developing rat telencephalon as revealed by retrograde and in situ hybridization double labeling. J Comp Neurol. 2000;417:275–288. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(20000214)417:3<275::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Denaxa M, Chan CH, Schachner M, Parnavelas JG, Karagogeos D. The adhesion molecule TAG-1 mediates the migration of cortical interneurons from the ganglionic eminence along the corticofugal fiber system. Development. 2001;128:4635–4644. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.22.4635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Espinosa A, Gil-Sanz C, Yanagawa Y, Fairen A. Two separate subtypes of early non-subplate projection neurons in the developing cerebral cortex of rodents. Front Neuroanat. 2009;3:27. doi: 10.3389/neuro.05.027.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Felsenfeld DP, Hynes MA, Skoler KM, Furley AJ, Jessell TM. TAG-1 can mediate homophilic binding, but neurite outgrowth on TAG-1 requires an L1-like molecule and beta 1 integrins. Neuron. 1994;12:675–690. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90222-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Förster E, Tielsch A, Saum B, et al. Reelin, Disabled 1, and beta 1 integrins are required for the formation of the radial glial scaffold in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13178–13183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202035899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Radakovits R, Barros CS, Belvindrah R, Patton B, Müller U. Regulation of radial glial survival by signals from the meninges. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7694–7705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5537-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saito T, Nakatsuji N. Efficient gene transfer into the embryonic mouse brain using in vivo electroporation. Dev Biol. 2001;240:237–246. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Loulier K, Lathia JD, Marthiens V, et al. beta1 integrin maintains integrity of the embryonic neocortical stem cell niche. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Guo W, Jiang H, Gray V, Dedhar S, Rao Y. Role of the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in determining neuronal polarity. Dev Biol. 2007;306:457–468. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Delcommenne M, Tan C, Gray V, Rue L, Woodgett J, Dedhar S. Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase-dependent regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinase B/AKT by the integrin-linked kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:11211–11216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Westermann S, Weber K. Post-translational modifications regulate microtubule function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:938–947. doi: 10.1038/nrm1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stepanova T, Slemmer J, Hoogenraad CC, et al. Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein) J Neurosci. 2003;23:2655–2664. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02655.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Cappello S, Attardo A, Wu X, et al. The Rho-GTPase cdc42 regulates neural progenitor fate at the apical surface. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1099–1107. doi: 10.1038/nn1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Chen YM, Wang QJ, Hu HS, et al. Microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 functions downstream of the PAR-3/PAR-6/atypical PKC complex in regulating hippocampal neuronal polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8534–8539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509955103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Costa MR, Wen G, Lepier A, Schroeder T, Götz M. Par-complex proteins promote proliferative progenitor divisions in the developing mouse cerebral cortex. Development. 2008;135:11–22. doi: 10.1242/dev.009951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Shi SH, Jan LY, Jan YN. Hippocampal neuronal polarity specified by spatially localized mPar3/mPar6 and PI3-kinase activity. Cell. 2003;112:63–75. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01249-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang X, Zhu J, Yang GY, et al. Dishevelled promotes axon differentiation by regulating atypical protein kinase C. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:743–754. doi: 10.1038/ncb1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Palazzo AF, Eng CH, Schlaepfer DD, Marcantonio EE, Gundersen GG. Localized stabilization of microtubules by integrin- and FAK-facilitated Rho signaling. Science. 2004;303:836–839. doi: 10.1126/science.1091325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lim CJ, Han J, Yousefi N, et al. Alpha4 integrins are type I cAMP-dependent protein kinase-anchoring proteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:415–421. doi: 10.1038/ncb1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Toyoshima F, Nishida E. Integrin-mediated adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in an EB1- and myosin X-dependent manner. EMBO J. 2007;26:1487–1498. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Reverte CG, Benware A, Jones CW, LaFlamme SE. Perturbing integrin function inhibits microtubule growth from centrosomes, spindle assembly, and cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:491–497. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Adler CE, Fetter RD, Bargmann CI. UNC-6/Netrin induces neuronal asymmetry and defines the site of axon formation. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:511–518. doi: 10.1038/nn1666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lerman O, Ben-Zvi A, Yagil Z, Behar O. Semaphorin3A accelerates neuronal polarity in vitro and in its absence the orientation of DRG neuronal polarity in vivo is distorted. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007;36:222–234. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Staquicini FI, Dias-Neto E, Li J, et al. Discovery of a functional protein complex of netrin-4, laminin gamma1 chain, and integrin alpha6beta1 in mouse neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:2903–2908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813286106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hagedorn EJ, Yashiro H, Ziel JW, Ihara S, Wang Z, Sherwood DR. Integrin acts upstream of netrin signaling to regulate formation of the anchor cell's invasive membrane in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2009;17:187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Stanco A, Szekeres C, Patel N, et al. Netrin-1-alpha3beta1 integrin interactions regulate the migration of interneurons through the cortical marginal zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:7595–7600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811343106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yebra M, Montgomery AM, Diaferia GR, et al. Recognition of the neural chemoattractant Netrin-1 by integrins alpha6beta4 and alpha3beta1 regulates epithelial cell adhesion and migration. Dev Cell. 2003;5:695–707. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00330-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Höpker VH, Shewan D, Tessier-Lavigne M, Poo M, Holt C. Growth-cone attraction to netrin-1 is converted to repulsion by laminin-1. Nature. 1999;401:69–73. doi: 10.1038/43441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nakamoto T, Kain KH, Ginsberg MH. Neurobiology: new connections between integrins and axon guidance. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R121–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stevens A, Jacobs JR. Integrins regulate responsiveness to slit repellent signals. J Neurosci. 2002;22:4448–4455. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-11-04448.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li N, Hsu CH, Folch A. Parallel mixing of photolithographically defined nanoliter volumes using elastomeric microvalve arrays. Electrophoresis. 2005;26:3758–3764. doi: 10.1002/elps.200500171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. De Simoni A, Yu LM. Preparation of organotypic hippocampal slice cultures: interface method. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1439–1445. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Polleux F, Ghosh A. The slice overlay assay: a versatile tool to study the influence of extracellular signals on neuronal development. Sci STKE. 2002;2002:pl9. doi: 10.1126/stke.2002.136.pl9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information, Figure S1

Polarized activation of Itgb1 in cultured hippocampal neurons.

Supplementary information, Figure S2

Effects of Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies on axon development in cultured hippocampal neurons.

Supplementary information, Figure S3

Itgb1 is dispensable for the growth of minor neurites.

Supplementary information, Figure S4

Definition and angular distribution of axon-initiation sites.

Supplementary information, Figure S5

Effects of Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies on axon initiation on laminin-stripes.

Supplementary information, Figure S6

Effects of Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies on axon initiation and turning on laminin gradients.

Supplementary information, Figure S7

Homogenates of cortex from littermate P0 mice with indicated genotypes were subject to IB with indicated antibodies.

Supplementary information, Figure S8

Taxol stabilization of microtubules partially prevents the loss of neuronal polarity caused by Itgb1 function-blocking antibodies.

Supplementary information, Figure S9

Cortical sections from Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre mice at P20 were stained with antibody against Tbr1 (A) to mark layers II-IV and VI, or Cux1 (B) to mark layers II-III. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Supplementary information, Figure S10

Cortical sections of control (Itgb1f/f) or Itgb1 mutant (Itgb1f/f; Emx1-Cre) mice at E14.5 were stained with antibody against TAG1 or MAP2.

Supplementary information, Figure S11

Itgb1f/f or Itgb1f/+ mice at E15.5 were subject to in utero electroporation with pCAG-IRES-GFP plasmid together with pTurbo-Cre.

Supplementary information, Movie S1

Hippocampal neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3, together with plasmids encoding scrambled siRNA, and then cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes. At DIV 2, movement of individual EGFP-EB3 puncta was recorded using live imaging fluorescence microscope.

Supplementary information, Movie S2

Hippocampal neurons were transfected with EGFP-EB3, together with plasmids encoding Itgb1 siRNA, and cultured on substrates coated with laminin stripes. At DIV2, movement of individual EGFP-EB3 puncta was recorded using live imaging fluorescence microscope.


Articles from Cell Research are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES