Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2016 Feb 19;82(5):1586–1598. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02950-15

Dissection of Francisella-Host Cell Interactions in Dictyostelium discoideum

Elisabeth O Lampe a,b, Yannick Brenz c, Lydia Herrmann c, Urska Repnik d, Gareth Griffiths d, Carl Zingmark e, Anders Sjöstedt f, Hanne C Winther-Larsen a,b, Monica Hagedorn c,
Editor: E G Dudleyg
PMCID: PMC4771330  PMID: 26712555

Abstract

Francisella bacteria cause severe disease in both vertebrates and invertebrates and include one of the most infectious human pathogens. Mammalian cell lines have mainly been used to study the mechanisms by which Francisella manipulates its host to replicate within a large variety of hosts and cell types, including macrophages. Here, we describe the establishment of a genetically and biochemically tractable infection model: the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum combined with the fish pathogen Francisella noatunensis subsp. noatunensis. Phagocytosed F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis interacts with the endosomal pathway and escapes further phagosomal maturation by translocating into the host cell cytosol. F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis lacking IglC, a known virulence determinant required for Francisella intracellular replication, follows the normal phagosomal maturation and does not grow in Dictyostelium. The attenuation of the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC mutant was confirmed in a zebrafish embryo model, where growth of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC was restricted. In Dictyostelium, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis interacts with the autophagic machinery. The intracellular bacteria colocalize with autophagic markers, and when autophagy is impaired (Dictyostelium Δatg1), F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis accumulates within Dictyostelium cells. Altogether, the Dictyostelium-F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis infection model recapitulates the course of infection described in other host systems. The genetic and biochemical tractability of the system allows new approaches to elucidate the dynamic interactions between pathogenic Francisella and its host organism.

INTRODUCTION

The genus Francisella comprises Gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria that infect a wide range of species, including protozoa, invertebrates, and vertebrates (13). Francisella species can be divided into two lineages represented by Francisella tularensis, causing potentially fatal tularemia in humans, and Francisella noatunensis, infecting aquatic animals (46). The high infectivity (<10 CFU lethal dose) of F. tularensis (7) and its potential use for biological warfare (8) has generated increasing interest during the last decade in dissecting the interactions between pathogenic Francisella and its host at both the cellular and organism levels.

F. noatunensis shares high infectivity and a common core set of genes with the human pathogen F. tularensis (6). F. noatunensis is divided into two subspecies, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis and F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis, causing major problems in aquaculture based on Atlantic cod and tilapia, respectively (9). F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis generally causes a more aggressive disease, with up to 95% mortality (10). In Atlantic cod, its natural host, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis commonly causes a chronic systemic disease with tularemia-like symptoms, including granulomas in skin and internal organs (11). Preliminary studies in Atlantic cod cells suggest that the infection of phagocytic cells recapitulates the infection of mammalian macrophages with F. tularensis (12).

Francisella is able to invade and replicate in both phagocytic and nonphagocytic cell types, with macrophages being the predominant target cells (8, 13). After cell entry, the Francisella-containing phagosome interacts with the endosomal pathway and is transiently acidified (1416). Subsequently, the bacteria escape the phagosome into the cytosol, thereby avoiding phagolysosomal fusion and degradation (14, 15, 17, 18). Within the cytosol, Francisella replicates extensively, a process that leads to the death of human and murine macrophages in vitro and the release of bacteria, which can reinfect new host cells (19, 20). Inside the macrophage cytosol, Francisella has been shown to be targeted for autophagic degradation by ubiquitination and recruitment of p62 (21); however, the role of autophagy in Francisella infections is still disputed and varies between host cell models. In human macrophages, F. tularensis avoids autophagic degradation (2123) but is able to exploit the autophagic process by harvesting amino acids from degraded material (24). In murine macrophages, bacteria can reenter autophagic vacuoles after cytosolic replication, which has been suggested to help bacterial egress (25).

The virulence mechanisms of Francisella are still poorly understood despite thorough examination in many different hosts (26). The most prominent set of virulence genes is encoded within the 30-kb Francisella pathogenicity island (FPI) (27, 28). While F. tularensis subsp. tularensis and F. tularensis subsp. holarctica have two FPI copies in their genomes, Francisella novicida, Francisella philomiragia, and F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis have only one FPI (29, 30). The incomplete assembly of the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genome suggests that the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genome contains a single FPI (GOLD analysis [92] project identifier [ID], Ga0010024). Knockout mutants of most FPI genes display attenuated intracellular growth, often accompanied by an inability to escape the phagosome (3134). Notably, deletion of intracellular growth locus C (iglC) blocks escape from the phagosome and causes failure to induce apoptosis and downregulation of host signaling (20, 35, 36). IglC is suggested to form the inner tube of a type 6 secretion system but is also secreted into the host cell cytosol (37). Expression of iglC is highly upregulated during intracellular growth (38), and intriguingly, IglC is the most abundant protein identified in outer-membrane vesicles (OMVs) secreted by F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (39).

Several infection models are available to study Francisella infection in vivo (40) and in vitro (18, 41). Among animal models, mice are predominantly used, due to the wide spectrum of available genetic tools, but their susceptibilities to different F. tularensis strains differ drastically from those of humans (7, 40, 42). Research on intracellular aspects of Francisella infection is predominantly performed in vitro using human and murine macrophages. However, these host cell models show major differences in their responses to Francisella infection, such as inflammatory cytokine production (41, 43), as well as different interactions with the autophagic pathway (21, 25). Therefore, the development of alternative infection systems to study Francisella gained special interest, as indicated by the rising number of models, i.e., Drosophila melanogaster (in vivo and in vitro) (44, 45), zebrafish (46, 47), and amoeba (1, 3). These models may not present all features of the natural host infection, but they complement the currently used systems on the organism and cellular levels. They also have the power to reveal conserved bacterial and host strategies independent of specific model systems.

Amoebae are suggested to be the natural reservoir for waterborne tularemia, supported by the ability of F. tularensis and F. novicida to survive and replicate within the amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii (1, 3, 48) and Hartmannella vermiformis (3), respectively. It has been suggested that bacterial virulence in amoebae and macrophages is mediated by similar mechanisms. For example, IglC is essential for Francisella survival and growth in both systems (49). A similar principle is conserved in Legionella infections (50).

In this study, we established a Francisella infection model using the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum as a surrogate macrophage and F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis, which has an optimal growth temperature similar to that of the Dictyostelium host, as a pathogen. Basic processes of host-pathogen interactions, such as phagocytosis, phagosomal maturation, and autophagy, are evolutionarily well conserved and very similar between Dictyostelium and macrophages (5153). The easy and cheap handling in the laboratory, as well as the vast availability of Dictyostelium mutant strains, makes the amoeba a useful tool to dissect host-pathogen interactions. Dictyostelium is successfully established as a model to dissect host-pathogen interactions using a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, such as Legionella, Mycobacterium, and Pseudomonas (5456). Our study shows that infection of Dictyostelium with F. noatunensis recapitulates the cellular aspects of Francisella infection of mammalian macrophages and presents a useful model to map the interactions between pathogenic Francisella bacteria and their phagocytic host cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Host cells, bacterial strains, and culture conditions.

Wild-type (wt) Dictyostelium cells (Ax2) were cultured axenically as described previously (55). Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells have been described (57). F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis isolated from diseased Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) in Norway were transformed with a green (pKK289km::gfp) (58) or red (pKK289km::mCherry) fluorescent plasmid and were grown as described previously (46) unless otherwise stated.

Comparison of the igl locus of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis FSC769 with those of other Francisella species.

The F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis FSC769 sequencing data were accessed as contigs from the GOLD analysis project (ID, Ga0010024), among which contig 16 contains the igl locus. Sequence comparison was performed in CLC Workbench 6.6.2 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). The sequences selected for comparison were F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis LADL-07-285A (GI 564747871), F. philomiragia ATCC 25017 (GI 167596226), F. novicida U112 (GI 754269614), F. tularensis subsp. holarctica LVS (GI 754265763), and F. tularensis subsp. tularensis Schu S4 (GI 754282044).

Construction of the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC mutant and the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis iglC+ complementation strain.

The method used to construct the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC knockout construct was derived from Golovliov et al. (18) and is similar to the knockout construction done by Lindgren et al. (59). The primers are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. In short, the two ∼1,100-bp flanking regions of iglC were amplified using primers P1 to P4, and the PCR products were fused together through splicing by overhang extension (SOE) PCR (see Table S1 in the supplemental material, P1 and P4). The resulting knockout construct was ligated into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and further subcloned into the pDMK2 vector (60) using the restriction enzymes Fast Digest NotI and Fast Digest MluI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The final pDMK2::ΔiglC construct was transformed into electrocompetent Escherichia coli S17-1 (61).

E. coli S17 pDMK2::ΔiglC was grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.4 to 0.5. F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis was cultured for 2 days at 20°C and 100 rpm, and the OD600 was adjusted to 1. Both F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis and E. coli were pelleted and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and conjugation suspensions of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis and E. coli were deposited as 50-μl drops onto ECFA plates (62) and incubated at 20°C overnight. The colony material was washed once in PBS before being resuspended in PBS, spread on ECFA plates containing 10 μg/ml kanamycin and 75 μg/ml polymyxin, and incubated at 20°C. Colonies appeared after 2 weeks and were screened with primer sets P2 plus P5 and P1 plus P6. The resulting strain, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis pDMK2::ΔiglC, was suspended in PBS, and 10-fold dilutions were plated onto ECFA containing 5% sucrose and incubated at 20°C. Colonies appeared after 2 weeks and were screened with primer set P5 plus P7 and F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis groEL primers P8 and P9. Sequencing verified an in-frame deletion, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) with primers Q13 to Q16 confirmed no polar effects on the flanking genes, iglB and iglD.

The iglC gene was amplified with an Expand Long Range polymerase kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and primers P10 and P11 using genomic DNA (gDNA) from F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt as the template. iglC was ligated into pKK289Km (63) after digestion of the PCR product and the expression plasmid pKK289Km::gfp with the restriction enzymes NdeI and EcoRI (New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). The insert sequence was verified by Sanger sequencing using an Applied Biosystems sequencer at the University of Oslo. Transformation of pKK289Km::iglC into F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC was performed essentially as described by Bakkemo et al. (12), and the product was designated F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC+.

Plaque assay.

Five hundred microliters of Klebsiella and 1,000 ml of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis and F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC cultures were centrifuged for 15 min at 5,000 × g and 10,000 × g, respectively. The pellets were washed twice with Sørensen buffer (2 g/liter KH2PO4, 0.29 g/liter Na2HPO4; pH 6), and the resuspended bacteria were mixed with 50 Dictyostelium cells in Sørensen buffer. The Dictyostelium-bacteria suspensions were spread on separate starvation plates (Sørensen buffer plus agar) and dried. The plates were incubated at 21°C and observed regularly for plaque formation on the following days.

Infection assay.

F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis was grown until it reached the exponential growth phase (64). Bacteria (multiplicity of infection [MOI] = 30) were washed and resuspended in HL5-C (ForMedium, Hunstanton, United Kingdom) for infection. Dictyostelium cells were grown without antibiotics to a confluence of 80 to 100%. On the day of infection, bacteria were centrifuged onto the cell monolayer at 100 × g and 21°C for 30 min using swing-out rotors and subsequently left to phagocytose for 5 min. Free bacteria were washed off with HL5-C. Finally, the infected cells were seeded in 10-cm tissue culture dishes at various time points and cell numbers (2, 4, and 6 h postinfection [hpi], 1 × 107; 24 hpi, 4.5 × 106; 48 hpi, 2 × 106). At each time point, the cells were resuspended, counted, and either fixed to examine the infection by microscopy and flow cytometry or frozen at −20°C to measure genome equivalents by qPCR. For flow cytometry, 1 × 106 cells were centrifuged (500 × g; 2 min; room temperature) in fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) tubes and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in Sørensen buffer for 1 h at room temperature or at 4°C overnight. Fixation was stopped with 100 mM glycine-PBS for 5 min. For manual counting of the bacterial load by wide-field fluorescence microscopy (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany, and Olympus Europa Holding GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), a minimum of 100 Dictyostelium cells were scored and categorized. For flow cytometry analysis, the green fluorescence representing bacteria was expressed as the number of relative fluorescence units (RFU) per unit volume (milliliter) of cell culture. Therefore, the infection rate was multiplied by the Dictyostelium cell growth (cells per milliliter) to obtain the number of infected cells per milliliter. This value was multiplied by the mean green-fluorescence (FL-1) value of Francisella bacteria only, which was calculated as the mean FL-1 of infected cells minus the mean FL-1 of noninfected cells. All samples were analyzed at the same fluorescence detector settings. At least 40,000 cells were analyzed per sample using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Calculations were done in Excel and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

In association studies of fixed samples, positive associations with p80 and VatA were verified when bacteria were fully enclosed within a p80- or VatA-positive vacuole. Positive ubiquitin association was counted when the bacteria were coated with longitudinal patches or full rings of ubiquitin. Adjacency of ubiquitin dots was not considered.

Antibodies.

Mouse primary antibodies against the following antigens were obtained: p80 (65) from P. Cosson (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland), VatA (66) from M. Maniak (Kassel University, Kassel, Germany), and FK2H (anti-polyubiquitinylated conjugates) from Enzo (Farmingdale, NY, USA). Rabbit polyclonal antibody against green fluorescent protein (GFP) was bought from MBL International (Woburn, MA, USA). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse coupled to Alexa Fluor 488 and 558, respectively (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Immunolabeling.

Immunolabeling for microscopy was performed on coverslips as described previously (67). Primary antibodies were used as followed: p80/VatA, 1:10; ubiquitin, 1:1,000, and GFP, 1:1,000. Secondary antibodies were used at 1:1,000.

For flow cytometry analysis, PFA-fixed cells were blocked (0.5% fetal calf serum [FCS], 0.1% Triton in PBS for 20 min), centrifuged (500 × g; 5 min; room temperature), and incubated in primary antibody solution (α-GFP; 1:1,000 in blocking solution) for 1 h. After two washes with blocking solution, the cells were stained for 1 h with secondary antibody solution (goat α-rabbit 488), washed twice, and resuspended in PBS for flow cytometry analysis.

Live imaging.

For live imaging, infected cells were placed in a 35-mm μ-dish (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) at the appropriate times of infection in filtered HL5-C medium. Imaging was performed with either an Olympus IX81 wide-field fluorescence microscope (Olympus Europa Holding GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) equipped with a 60× UPlanSApo oil immersion objective (numerical aperture [NA] 1.35) at 21°C with 10-s intervals or a Zeiss LSM 5 live confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 100× Europlan Apochromat oil immersion objective (NA 1.4), a diode laser 488, and a DPSS (diode-pumped solid-state) laser 561 (single-track mode; 1 airy unit [a measure of pinhole radius size]; dual-band filter [500 to 545 band pass, 575 long pass]). Brightness and contrast were adjusted on complete images using ImageJ (68).

Cryofixation, chemical fixation, and transmission electron microscopy.

Infected cells were cryofixed in an EM HPM100 high-pressure-freezing machine (Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria) (69) using cellulose capillary tubes (a kind gift from Heinz Schwarz) (70), Freeze substitution (Balzers FSU 010; Bal-Tec, Balzers, Liechtenstein) was performed as described by Leonidova et al. (71). Subsequently, samples were embedded in Epon resin (Fluka, St. Louis, MO, USA) or LR White resin (Electron Microscopic Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) as described by the manufacturers. Sections (70 nm) were examined using a CM100 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eidhoven, Netherlands). For imaging, a Quemesa transmission electron microscopy (TEM) charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera and iTEM software v 5.1 (both from Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, Münster, Germany) were used.

For chemical fixation, infected cells were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde (GA) and 1% PFA in HL5-C for 2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the cells were postfixed with 2% GA-sodium cacodylate (0.1 M) and finally stained with 2% OsO4 and 1.5% K3Fe(CN)6. Before dehydration with ethyl alcohol (EtOH), samples were stained with 1.5% uranylacetate for 30 min. Finally, the cell pellets were embedded in Epon, and sections were prepared and examined as described above for cryofixed samples (for a detailed description of the method, see the supplemental material).

Zebrafish embryo maintenance.

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) AB wt embryos were obtained from the Zebrafish Laboratory facility at the Norwegian University of Life Science. The embryos were dechorionated manually at 30 h postfertilization, transferred to fresh embryo water, and kept at 28°C before injections. All embryos were kept at 22°C after injections, and the water was changed at least every second day. Phenyl-2-thiourea (PTU) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to the embryo water to a concentration of 0.003% (wt/vol) to reduce pigmentation for imaging purposes.

Zebrafish embryo microinjections.

Preparation of bacteria and intravascular microinjections of 1 nl into the duct of Cuvier were performed as described previously (46). The F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt and ΔiglC strains used for zebrafish embryo microinjections expressed GFP in trans, and F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC+ expressed IglC in trans. The number of injected CFU was determined by plating 10-fold serial dilutions from the injection solution, as described previously (46), and was found to be 2.2 × 103 to 3.5 × 103 CFU per injection. A control group was injected with sterile PBS (pH 7.4). Each group consisted of at least 30 embryos. Two embryos per group were imaged on days 2, 4, and 6 postinjection according to the protocol described for the Leica DM IRB (46). Samples for DNA extraction (see below) were taken at 3 and 7 days postinfection (dpi). The experiment was terminated at 7 dpi.

Sampling and DNA extraction from zebrafish embryos and Dictyostelium.

On days 3 and 7, zebrafish embryos (12 from each group) were euthanized with an overdose of tricain (200 to 300 μg/ml), after which they were split into samples consisting of three embryos per tube, the liquid was replaced with 200 μl RNALater, and the samples were stored at 4°C until DNA extraction. For isolation of genomic DNA from Dictyostelium, 5 × 106 cells were collected at appropriate time points and stored at −20°C. Genomic DNA was extracted with a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) according to the protocol for animal tissues (spin column protocol).

Francisella-specific quantitative PCR.

Five microliters of gDNA was used as the template for qPCR in a 20-μl reaction mixture using LightCycler 480 SYBR green I Master mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and a Lightcycler 480 qPCR machine (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were run in duplicate, and samples from 5 Dictyostelium infection experiments were used for quantification via qPCR. F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis-specific primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material, Q9 and Q10) for quantification of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genomes were obtained from Duodu et al. (72). F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis, genome equivalents were obtained by normalization of the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis-specific gene to Dictyostelium rnlA as a reference gene (73). Dictyostelium cell growth was included by multiplying F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genome equivalents by the Dictyostelium growth factor. For zebrafish experiments, 1 ng F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis gDNA was used as an equilibrator in the qPCR run, and absolute quantification was performed so that 20 fg corresponded to 10 F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genome equivalents, as described previously (72).

RT-PCR of autophagy-associated genes.

For reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis of atg8 and p62, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt-infected and mock-treated cells were lysed with TRIzol (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at the indicated time points. RNA extraction was performed using the PureLink RNA minikit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions for TRIzol extraction. For subsequent cDNA synthesis, the Maxima First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was diluted 1:10 in nuclease-free water, and 5 μl of each sample was used as the template in an RT-PCR with the same setup and machine as described for Francisella-specific qPCR. Primers for GAPDH, atg8, and p62 are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Samples were run in duplicate, and samples from 4 F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt infection experiments were analyzed. The resulting data were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method with gapdh as a reference gene.

RESULTS

Dictyostelium does not feed on F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis.

To monitor whether Dictyostelium can use Francisella as a food source, we examined Dictyostelium growth on a lawn of bacteria using the plaque assay, as established by Cosson et al. (54). When seeded on a dense lawn of nonpathogenic Klebsiella aerogenes, Dictyostelium cells were able to grow and form plaques (Fig. 1A) after 4 days. In contrast, Dictyostelium was not able to form plaques when placed on a lawn of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt bacteria (Fig. 1B). These observations suggest that Dictyostelium is not able to utilize Francisella as a nutrient source, in contrast to food bacteria, like Klebsiella. As with other pathogenic bacterial species, this could result from bacterial evasion of the degradative phagosomal maturation pathway (55).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Persistence and replication of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis in Dictyostelium is dependent on IglC. (A and B) Plaque assay to determine resistance of bacteria to feeding of Dictyostelium. Dictyostelium feeds and forms plaques on a lawn of K. aerogenes (K.a.) (A), but not on F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (F.n.n.) wt (B). Shown are images of one representative experiment (n = 3). (C and E) Infection rate (y axis) and bacteria/cell (bar sections) of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt (C) and ΔiglC (E) in Dictyostelium wt cells over 48 hpi. Data were collected from 7 replicates, and a minimum of 100 cells were counted. The error bars indicate standard errors of the mean (SEM). (D) Nucleotide sequence comparison of iglA to iglD in F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis FSC769 with other selected Francisella spp. (F.t.t., F. tularensis subsp. tularensis; F.n.o., F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis). The results are presented as percent nucleotide identity with the iglA to iglD loci of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis FSC769 after pairwise comparison. The depth of gray shading indicates the level of sequence identity, with dark gray representing the highest similarity. (F and G) Bacterial replication of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt and ΔiglC was measured by flow cytometry analysis of bacterial green fluorescence per unit volume of infected cell culture (F) and by qPCR of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genomes normalized to host cell genomes (G). Data from 8 (F) and 5 (G) independent experiments (means ± SEM) were collected (unpaired, two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Francisella persists and replicates in Dictyostelium.

Dictyostelium cells were allowed to ingest GFP-expressing F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt bacteria in a synchronous fashion, and subsequently, the number of bacteria per Dictyostelium cell was monitored up to 48 hpi (Fig. 1C). Manual counting of the bacterial load per single cell using fluorescence microscopy revealed that the percentage of infected cells decreased gradually from 86.2% (1 hpi) to 11.7% (48 hpi). In the early phase of the infection, until 6 hpi, the proportion of cells containing more than 3 bacteria decreased from 53.1% to 20.3% infected cells. However, in the late phase (24 to 48 hpi) the proportion of cells with more than 3 bacteria increased to 32.2% (24 hpi) and 36.7% (48 hpi), respectively (Fig. 1C). Taking into account that Dictyostelium and Francisella possess similar generation times of approximately 8 h in culture (62, 74), these data indicate that the total number of bacteria starts to increase at 24 hpi.

The Francisella virulence factor IglC has been shown to be an essential bacterial factor to escape phagosomal maturation (33, 75), which is crucial for bacterial persistence in the host cell. iglC is located in the iglABCD locus (Fig. 1D) within the FPI, which displays the highest similarity to those of F. philomiragia (∼96% identity) and F. noatunensis subsp. orientalis (88% to 96.7%). The igl sequence identity between F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis and the F. tularensis lineage ranges from 81.1% to 85.8% (Fig. 1D; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We generated an F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis iglC knockout strain (ΔiglC) and compared the fate of this mutant to that of wt bacteria in Dictyostelium cells (Fig. 1C and E). The initial loads of bacteria per cell were very similar for F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt and ΔiglC at 1 hpi (85.6 and 84.6%, respectively). In contrast to the wild type, the number of infected cells, as well as the number of ΔiglC bacteria per cell, dropped rapidly at 4 hpi (wt, 64.2%; ΔiglC, 13%). Eventually, intracellular ΔiglC bacteria almost disappeared from the Dictyostelium culture, indicated by low infection rates at 24 (3.5%) and 48 (0.6%) hpi. Surprisingly, the plaque assay revealed that amoebae were not able to grow on a lawn of the ΔiglC strain (not shown).

In addition to quantitative fluorescence microscopy of single cells, we applied flow cytometry analysis, which allowed us to quantitatively analyze the fluorescence of a large number of cells at different time points (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). As indicated by the bacterial count using microscopy, flow cytometry analysis revealed that Dictyostelium cells infected with wt Francisella showed a 2-fold increase in fluorescence over time, indicating growth of GFP-expressing F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (Fig. 1F). In contrast, the green fluorescent signal of the ΔiglC mutant showed a decrease to 13% at 4 hpi and remained low until 48 hpi.

In addition to these visual analyses, we used quantitative PCR to establish the number of Francisella genomes in relation to host cell genomes at the indicated time points (Fig. 1G). Overall, the results confirmed what had been observed with the previous approaches. The number of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt genomes increased, after an initial reduction at 4 hpi by 2.3-fold, until 48 hpi. In contrast, when cells infected with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC bacteria were analyzed, the number of genomes decreased rapidly, suggesting complete clearance of the bacteria. Taking into account that Francisella bacteria were not able to grow in Dictyostelium growth medium, these observations suggest that wt bacteria are able to infect and replicate within their Dictyostelium host cells in an IglC-dependent manner.

The attenuation of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC bacteria was further confirmed in a multicellular organism using the zebrafish embryo model established by Brudal et al. (46). Microinjections of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis were administered intravenously into the duct of Cuvier (see Fig. S3A in the supplemental material), and the course of infection was monitored by fluorescence microscopy (see Fig. S3B to G in the supplemental material) and F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis-specific qPCR (see Fig. S3H in the supplemental material). Both methods showed a lower mean bacterial burden in the ΔiglC group than in the wt group on day 3 and day 7 postinfection. The wt-infected zebrafish embryos were clinically observed through notably reduced flight reaction (unpublished observation) compared to the other groups. All infected groups showed an increase in bacterial load from days 3 to 7, but the total number of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis genomes on day 7 was considerably lower in the ΔiglC group. This experiment shows that F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC growth is also restricted in zebrafish embryos. The F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC mutant expressing IglC in trans (iglC+) partly regained wt growth performance in the embryos.

Francisella avoids phagosomal maturation in Dictyostelium in an IglC-dependent way.

The phagosomal escape of Francisella is IglC dependent, and it is well established that escape from phagosomal maturation is a prerequisite for successful infection of Francisella (14, 17, 33, 63). Therefore, we quantified the association of wt and ΔiglC F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis with established phagosomal maturation markers (55) over time using immunofluorescence microscopy. p80 is a putative Dictyostelium copper transporter that is enriched on phagosomes toward the late maturation stage (65). Both Francisella strains showed strong accumulation of p80 at the early stage (67% of wt and 79% of ΔiglC at 1 hpi); however, over the course of infection, the association of p80 with wt bacteria fell to 4% at 48 hpi (Fig. 2A and B). In contrast, p80 association with Francisella bacteria lacking iglC remained high (from 79 to 68%) over 48 h.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Escape from phagosomal maturation by F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis is dependent on IglC. (A) Association rates of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (F.n.n.) wt and ΔiglC with the endosomal marker p80 over 48 hpi (means ± SEM; n = 3 or 4). (C and E) Association rates of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt and ΔiglC with the acidification marker VatA over 48 hpi (C) and early in infection (≤1 hpi) (E). (B and D) Corresponding micrographs of p80 (green) association with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (red) wt and ΔiglC at 1 and 6 hpi. Three independent experiments were conducted for each time course, with representative micrographs at 1 and 6 hpi. (F) Ubiquitin (Ub) association of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt over 48 h (means ± SEM; n = 3 or 4). The inset shows ubiquitin-positive (green) and -negative (red) examples of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt. Ubiquitinated ΔiglC bacteria were not detected. A minimum of 100 bacteria were counted for association studies. (G and H) Time frames of Dictyostelium Lifeact-RFP cells (red) infected with GFP-expressing F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt (green) at 18 hpi (G) and ΔiglC at 2 hpi (H). The areas of interest are boxed, and the insets show the red channels of the regions of interest. In panels B and D, the arrows indicate marker-positive compartments and the arrowheads indicate marker-negative bacteria; in panel H, the arrow indicates exocytosed bacteria. Scale bars, 5 μm. Unpaired, two-tailed t test: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

We also followed the association of bacteria with VatA (Fig. 2C to E), the cytosolic and catalytic subunit of the V-ATPase (76). The presence of VatA on the vacuole containing bacteria is an indication that bacteria are present in an acidic, potentially bactericidal compartment (77). Wt and ΔiglC Francisella showed equal associations of more than 90% in VatA-positive compartments at 15 min postinfection, which dropped similarly for both strains until 1 hpi (Fig. 2E). Contrasting with the constant drop in association observed for wt bacteria, the VatA association of ΔiglC bacteria continued to fall only until 2 hpi and subsequently increased to 63% (6 hpi) and then remained stable. After phagocytosis, VatA was retrieved from the vacuoles containing bacteria in both strains and followed typical VatA dynamics in Dictyostelium (78), but only wt bacteria were able to escape the VatA-positive compartment permanently (Fig. 2C and D). In contrast, the ΔiglC mutant regained its VatA accumulation by either reassociation or reinfection. Taken together, the observed patterns suggest that F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt bacteria are able to escape phagosomal maturation. Without IglC, the bacteria fail to escape and remain within the degradative maturation pathway.

Francisella bacteria are known to translocate very early in infection from their phagosome into the host cell cytosol in an IglC-dependent fashion (18, 33, 75). Therefore, we quantified the colocalization of Francisella bacteria with ubiquitin. Ubiquitination occurs only if bacteria are accessible to the host cell cytosol. Associations were counted using fluorescence microscopy with fixed samples at the indicated time points. In contrast to the wild type, which showed a stable ubiquitin association with 1 to 2% of the bacteria (Fig. 2F), no association was observed with the mutant strain lacking IglC.

Finally, in Dictyostelium, phagosomal maturation ends with exocytosis of the ingested particle or bacterium (79). In general, exocytosis is accompanied by a burst of F actin accumulation around the particle (78). Therefore, we infected Dictyostelium cells expressing a red fluorescent actin marker (Lifeact-RFP) (80) with green fluorescent Francisella and used live fluorescence microscopy to follow their fate. Wt F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis was observed to be evenly distributed within the host cell and showed only occasional, transient association with F actin (Fig. 2G; see Movie S1 in the supplemental material). In contrast, ΔiglC bacteria were found to be clustered in compartments and more frequently exocytosed, accompanied by a sudden flash of F actin (Fig. 2H; see Movie S2 in the supplemental material). These results support the model that, as in other host systems with various Francisella strains (33, 63, 75), F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis escapes the early phagosome in an IglC-dependent fashion into the cytosol of Dictyostelium, where it replicates.

Electron microscopic analyses reveal cytosolic Francisella.

To confirm the subcellular localization of Francisella bacteria within Dictyostelium cells, ultrastrucural analysis was performed at 1, 4, and 24 hpi. Samples were either chemically fixed and processed by conventional room temperature dehydration or cryofixed with high-pressure freezing (HPF) and processed by freeze substitution in order to improve the ultrastructural preservation. With both methods, at 1 hpi, both F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt and ΔiglC resided within vacuoles with well-defined membranes (HPF, Fig. 3A, B, E, and F; chemical fixation, see Fig. S4A in the supplemental material). In addition, in the cryofixed samples, ruptured phagosomal membranes were observed for F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt (see Fig. S5A and B in the supplemental material), but not with the ΔiglC mutant strain. Similar events were also observed by fluorescence microscopy, in which F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt bacteria were seen escaping a rupturing p80-positive compartment at 4 hpi (see Fig. S5C and D in the supplemental material). At 4 and 24 hpi, most F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt bacteria were localized within the Dictyostelium cytosol without a surrounding membrane (Fig. 3C and D; see Fig. S4B in the supplemental material). In contrast to wt bacteria, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC bacteria were located in vacuoles at 4 hpi as either single, multiple, or often partly digested bacteria (Fig. 3G). In chemically fixed samples, bacteria, both phagosomal and cytosolic, were surrounded with electron-translucent areas, so-called halos (see Fig. S4A and B in the supplemental material), which were previously suggested to represent a bacterial capsule (17, 22). However, in cryofixed samples, we could observe an electron-pale area only around cytosolic bacteria (Fig. 3). This area represented weakly contrasted material and looked notably different from the halos around chemically fixed bacteria. Lectins specific for mannose, galactose, glucose, N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetylglucosamine, or sialic acid-containing carbohydrates did not bind to this electron-pale zone (data not shown). At all stages, we observed great variations of the bacterial structure, from round to starlike shapes, in chemically as well as cryo-fixed samples, indicating that these shapes were not artifactual.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Cytosolic translocation of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis is dependent on IglC. Ultrastructural analysis of high-pressure-frozen Dictyostelium wt cells infected with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (F.n.n.) wt (A to D) and ΔiglC (E to G) was performed. Shown are representative examples of overviews (A and E) and high-magnification images at 1 (B and F), 4 (C and G), and 24 (D) hpi. *, intact F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis; ×, digested F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis; arrows, membranes enclosing bacteria; arrowheads, electron-pale areas characteristic of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis after HPF. Scale bars, 2 μm (A and E) and 500 nm (B to D, F, and G).

Francisella associates with autophagic markers.

Pathogenic bacteria present in the host cell cytosol are known to interact with the autophagic pathway of the host cell (81); however, for Francisella, these interactions are disputed (21, 24, 25). To complement current concepts and to gain further insight, we investigated the interaction of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis with the autophagic machinery in our system. We infected Dictyostelium cell lines expressing one of the following GFP-tagged proteins with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt expressing mCherry: ubiquitin, which labels substrates for autophagic degradation; p62, a ubiquitin scaffolding protein; or Atg8, which is required for the formation of autophagosomal membranes. The association of bacteria with the respective marker protein was quantified via live-cell fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 4A to D). During the early phase of infection (1 to 6 hpi), the association of bacteria with the marker proteins remained below 3%. At the late stage of infection (24 hpi), the associations with ubiquitin and p62 rose to 5 and 9%, respectively. In contrast, the association with Atg8 remained at a low but constant level (1 to 2%) throughout infection. Electron microscopy on HPF sections revealed that formerly cytosolic F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt bacteria were enclosed inside a vacuole, which in addition contained ribosomal structures and could therefore represent autophagosomes (see Fig. S4C and D in the supplemental material).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis interacts with the autophagic machinery and shows increased growth in Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells. (A to C) Dictyostelium cells expressing GFP-tagged markers (green) of the autophagy machinery were infected with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis (F.n.n.) wt expressing mCherry (red). Shown are representative micrographs of a positive association of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt with ubiquitin (A), p62 (B), and Atg8 (C) at 24 hpi. Scale bars, 5 μm. (D) Association rates of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt with autophagy markers over 48 hpi (means ± SEM; n = 3 or 4). (E) p62 and atg8 mRNA levels were measured in Dictyostelium wt cells infected with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt via RT-PCR over 48 hpi. The mRNA amounts of the genes were normalized to gapdh as a housekeeping gene and are displayed as the fold change (means and SEM; n = 4). (F) Infection rate and numbers of bacteria per cell of Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells infected with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt over 48 hpi (mean and SEM; n = 3). (G) Bacterial growth in Dictyostelium wt and Δatg1 cells was measured by flow cytometry analysis and is displayed in RFU per unit volume of cell culture (means ± SEM; n = 6 to 13) (unpaired, two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

mRNA levels of autophagic genes are slightly upregulated.

To quantify activation of autophagy in infected Dictyostelium cells, we measured the amounts of mRNAs of selected host cell genes at different time points during infection by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4E). The amounts of atg8 and p62 mRNA were compared to a mock control (uninfected cells). Infected Dictyostelium wt cells showed slightly increased (1.5- to 2-fold) atg8 mRNA levels compared to the mock control in the early phase of infection; however, it was significant only at 2 and 6 hpi. In the late phase, from 24 to 48 hpi, atg8 mRNA levels dropped to levels similar to those observed for the mock control. The amount of p62 mRNA was slightly elevated at 6 and 24 hpi.

Increased bacterial burden in Dictyostelium cells lacking functional Atg1.

Analyses of cellular markers and mRNA levels argue for activation of the autophagic pathway by F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis in the Dictyostelium-Francisella system. To investigate the impact of autophagy on the outcome of infection, we monitored Francisella infection in Dictyostelium atg1 knockout cells (Δatg1) (57). Atg1 (Ulk1/2) is a key component of the canonical autophagy initiation complex, and the Dictyostelium Δatg1 mutant is strictly impaired in autophagy (82).

Fluorescence microscopy was used to establish the number of bacteria in Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells (Fig. 4F). In the early phase of infection (up to 6 hpi), wt F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis followed similar courses of infection for wt and Δatg1 host cells, with gradually decreasing infection rates and bacterial burden per cell. However, at a late stage, Δatg1 host cells showed a significantly higher infection rate at 24 (wt, 24.2%; Δatg1, 37.6%) and 48 (wt, 11.7%; Δatg1, 23.5%) hpi and more bacteria per cell than Dictyostelium wt cells (Fig. 1D). In addition to single-cell counting, we followed the infection by applying flow cytometry (Fig. 4G). The results agreed with the manual counting and revealed a significantly stronger increase of the bacterial burden in Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells than in the wt from 24 hpi onward.

F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis shows a higher degree of ubiquitin association in Δatg1 cells.

The higher bacterial burden in the Dictyostelium Δatg1 mutant suggests that F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis interacts with the autophagic machinery. To determine if there is a difference in the escape from phagosomal maturation when the autophagic machinery is impaired, we quantified the association of established phagosomal maturation markers with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis over the course of infection using fluorescence microscopy. The association of bacteria with p80, as well as VatA, showed no significant difference between Dictyostelium wt and Δatg1 cells (see Fig. S6A and B in the supplemental material). However, the association of bacteria with ubiquitin increased significantly in Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells, from 3% (6 hpi) to 27% (24 hpi) and eventually 51% at 48 hpi (see Fig. S6C and D in the supplemental material). Thus, the inital courses of infection (up to 6 hpi) are comparable in wt and Δatg1 host cells regarding phagosomal maturation and bacterial burden. In contrast, the late stage is characterized by a higher bacterial burden in Δatg1 cells, which is accompanied by an accumulation of ubiquitin-associated bacteria.

DISCUSSION

Our data reveal that F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis infects Dictyostelium and that the course of infection recapitulates the infection of mammalian macrophages (Fig. 5A and B) (14, 17, 21, 33). As with other pathogenic bacteria (54, 8386), Dictyostelium was not able to feed on a lawn of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis. The lack of growth on avirulent F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC suggests either that IglC is not the only virulence factor that provides resistance against the amoeba or that Dictyostelium is in general unable to efficiently digest the bacteria.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Comparison of Francisella infections in human, Dictyostelium, and an environmental amoeba. (A and B) Macrophages (A) and Dictyostelium (B) phagocytose Francisella bacteria, forming a phagosomal compartment with endosomal characteristics. With acidification of this compartment, Francisella wt bacteria escape the phagosome into the cytosol early in infection. Avirulent mutant bacteria (ΔiglC) remain within the phagosome (which is reneutralized in Dictyostelium) but are either attenuated in growth (macrophages) or exocytosed (Dictyostelium). In both host cells, Francisella replicates in the cytosol, and a small proportion of bacteria are targeted by autophagy. (C) In Acanthamoeba, a potential environmental host, the course of Francisella infection is very different. After phagocytosis, Francisella resides in a spacious vacuole showing endosomal properties and acidification. In contrast to macrophages and Dictyostelium, Francisella subsequently does not escape its compartment but replicates inside the vacuole. Intriguingly, cells infected with F. novicida show cyst formation. F.n.n., F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis.

F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis is ingested via phagocytosis by Dictyostelium and initially resides in a de novo-formed phagosome. Subsequently, as with F. tularensis in other host cells (14, 17, 18, 25, 33), F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis bypasses phagosomal maturation and escapes into the cytosol (Fig. 5) (14, 17, 18, 25, 33). F. tularensis has been shown to associate with early and late endosomal markers and escapes the phagosome in mammalian cells at the early stage of infection (1 to 8 hpi) (17, 18, 25, 33). This time correlates with the observed cytosolic translocation in Dictyostelium, as monitored by the association of wt F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis with p80 and electron microscopy analyses. Similar to F. tularensis (21), the association of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis with ubiquitin confirms the bacterial presence in, or accessibility to, the cytosol in Dictyostelium. The low number of associations could be due either to a constant turnover of ubiquitin (87) or, possibly, to the shedding of bacterial outer proteins acting as a decoy for the host cell, as has been described for mycobacteria (88).

The escape from phagosomal maturation in Dictyostelium is dependent on the Francisella virulence factor IglC. In contrast to the F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt, the iglC deletion mutant follows the classical phagosomal maturation pathway, as described for latex beads or nonvirulent bacteria in Dictyostelium (51, 78, 89) that remain within an endosomal compartment with no colocalization with ubiquitin. Eventually, the bacteria are exocytosed, as observed by live microscopy.

A major hallmark of phagosomal maturation is the acidification of the newly formed phagosome. Previous studies showed transient acidification of the F. tularensis-containing phagosome in the early phase of infection, but its impact on the course of infection is disputed (14, 15, 32). The F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis-containing phagosome in Dictyostelium associates with the V-ATPase subunit VatA, suggesting acidification. The virulence factor IglC has been associated with a protective role against acidification (63). However, the apparently iglC-independent VatA association observed in Dictyostelium suggests that avoidance of acidification occurs by escape from the phagosome (17, 63) rather than by active regulation.

The increase of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis bacteria in Dictyostelium starts in the late phase of infection and coincides with bacterial presence in the cytosol. This is in accordance with our zebrafish model system, which revealed an intracellular generation time of 43 h for F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis wt (62). Also, in Dictyostelium, the attenuated phenotype of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC recapitulates what is observed in mammalian cells, where ΔiglC bacteria are not able to replicate inside their restricted vacuoles (18, 75). The attenuation of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis ΔiglC in zebrafish embryos corroborates the Dictyostelium phenotype in a multicellular organism featuring an innate immune system. These observations sustain the concept of using Dictyostelium as a platform for Francisella mutant screening and characterization.

Our ultrastructural analyses of HPF Dictyostelium cells infected with F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis confirm that Francisella bacteria are indeed extremely polymorphic and indicate that the electron-translucent area around bacteria in chemically fixed samples is a fixation artifact. For chemically fixed F. tularensis in macrophages, a similar zone has been suggested to represent a capsule made of the polysaccharide O antigen (22). Nevertheless, in HPF samples, cytosolic bacteria were surrounded with an electron-pale area, which appeared to contain weakly contrasted material. We could not label this area with multiple lectins, which indicates that it is not enriched in certain carbohydrates.

In contrast to Dictyostelium, Francisella infection of other amoebae, such as A. castellani and H. vermiformis, follows a very different course. In the latter amoebae, the bacteria are found to replicate intracellularly in vacuoles and do not seem to translocate into the host cell cytosol (3, 48). In A. castellani, frequent cyst formation was observed, which was induced by the bacteria and might contribute to long-term survival of Francisella in the environment (3, 48). This different life cycle of Francisella in Dictyostelium compared to other amoebae suggests that Dictyostelium does not play a role in environmental transmission (Fig. 5). Instead, the susceptibility of Dictyostelium to F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis and features shared with the mammalian system highlight evolutionarily conserved factors and common mechanisms between Dictyostelium and mammalian phagocytes.

Francisella has been described as interacting with the autophagic machinery; however, the impact and relevance of this interaction on the course of infection are debated and vary between host cell types (21, 24, 25). In Dictyostelium, the complete autophagic pathway is fully conserved, and its genetic tractability allows the dissection of F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis interaction with the autophagic machinery. In Dictyostelium Δatg1 cells, F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis growth is increased, which is not caused by drastically altered phagosomal maturation, but rather, coincides with bacterial association with autophagy markers. This suggests a degradative role for autophagy in the Dictyostelium-F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis system. Also, in Atg5−/− murine embryonic fibroblasts lacking canonical autophagy, the bacterial burden of F. tularensis was increased, reflecting the protective role of autophagy in Francisella infection (24). However, this was not the case in Atg5−/− murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (21), thus highlighting the cell-type-specific role of autophagy in Francisella infection. In addition, Francisella infection of wt Dictyostelium cells was accompanied by increased levels of p62 and atg8 mRNA in the early phase of infection and decreased atg8 mRNA levels at 48 hpi. Overall, this indicates a dynamic interaction with the autophagic machinery that is dependent on the time during infection.

Altogether, we demonstrated that F. noatunensis subsp. noatunensis passes through a course of infection in Dictyostelium comparable to that of F. tularensis in macrophages, including the effect of the bacterial virulence factor IglC and interaction with autophagy as a host defense mechanism. Further highlighting the power of this model organism, Dictyostelium provides a wide range of genetic and chemical tools that can be used to facilitate a detailed dissection of host-pathogen interactions (51, 90). Therefore, the Dictyostelium-Francisella system is an excellent addition to current models of Francisella infection and expands our repertoire of tools to uncover the principles of virulence and host cell defense mechanisms.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Anne-Lise Rishovd for excellent qPCR work, Hendrik Herrmann for electron microscopy of chemically fixed samples, Frauke Bach for primer design, Ana C. S. Tavara for zebrafish supply, and Espen Brudal for zebrafish embryo microinjection expertise. We thank the Electron Microscopy Laboratory at the Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, for access to the instruments and Tove Bakar for embedding of chemically fixed samples. We are thankful to Andreas Brech, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, for his help with cryofixation; to Heinz Schwarz, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany, and to Andres Kaech, University of Zurich, for discussions on high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution; and to Tone Aksnes Lian for technical assistance with cryofixation. This work would not have been possible without dictyBase (91).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02950-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abd H, Johansson T, Golovliov I, Sandström G, Forsman M. 2003. Survival and growth of Francisella tularensis in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:600–606. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.600-606.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM. 2007. Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:30–66. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Santic M, Ozanic M, Semic V, Pavokovic G, Mrvcic V, Abu Kwaik Y. 2011. Intra-vacuolar proliferation of F. novicida within H. vermiformis. Front Microbiol 2:78. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Foley JE, Nieto NC. 2010. Tularemia. Vet Microbiol 140:332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nylund A, Ottem KF, Watanabe K, Karlsbakk E, Krossøy B. 2006. Francisella sp. (family Francisellaceae) causing mortality in Norwegian cod (Gadus morhua) farming. Arch Microbiol 185:383–392. doi: 10.1007/s00203-006-0109-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sjödin A, Svensson K, Ohrman C, Ahlinder J, Lindgren P, Duodu S, Johansson A, Colquhoun DJ, Larsson P, Forsman M. 2012. Genome characterisation of the genus Francisella reveals insight into similar evolutionary paths in pathogens of mammals and fish. BMC Genomics 13:268. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fortier AH, Slayter MV, Ziemba R, Meltzer MS, Nacy CA. 1991. Live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis: infection and immunity in mice. Infect Immun 59:2922–2928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oyston PC, Sjöstedt A, Titball RW. 2004. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:967–978. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Colquhoun DJ, Duodu S. 2011. Francisella infections in farmed and wild aquatic organisms. Vet Res 42:47. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hsieh CY, Tung MC, Tu C, Chang CD, Tsai SS. 2006. Enzootics of visceral granulomas associated with Francisella-like organism infection in tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Aquaculture 254:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zerihun MA, Feist SW, Bucke D, Olsen AB, Tandstad NM, Colquhoun DJ. 2011. Francisella noatunensis subsp. noatunensis is the aetiological agent of visceral granulomatosis in wild Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. Dis Aquat Organ 95:65–71. doi: 10.3354/dao02341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bakkemo KR, Mikkelsen H, Bordevik M, Torgersen J, Winther-Larsen HC, Vanberg C, Olsen R, Johansen LH, Seppola M. 2011. Intracellular localisation and innate immune responses following Francisella noatunensis infection of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) macrophages. Fish Shellfish Immunol 31:993–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. 2002. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:631–646. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.4.631-646.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chong A, Wehrly TD, Nair V, Fischer ER, Barker JR, Klose KE, Celli J. 2008. The early phagosomal stage of Francisella tularensis determines optimal phagosomal escape and Francisella pathogenicity island protein expression. Infect Immun 76:5488–5499. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00682-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clemens DL, Lee BY, Horwitz MA. 2009. Francisella tularensis phagosomal escape does not require acidification of the phagosome. Infect Immun 77:1757–1773. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01485-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Santic M, Asare R, Skrobonja I, Jones S, Abu Kwaik Y. 2008. Acquisition of the vacuolar ATPase proton pump and phagosome acidification are essential for escape of Francisella tularensis into the macrophage cytosol. Infect Immun 76:2671–2677. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00185-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Clemens DL, Lee BY, Horwitz MA. 2004. Virulent and avirulent strains of Francisella tularensis prevent acidification and maturation of their phagosomes and escape into the cytoplasm in human macrophages. Infect Immun 72:3204–3217. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3204-3217.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Golovliov I, Sjöstedt A, Mokrievich A, Pavlov V. 2003. A method for allelic replacement in Francisella tularensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 222:273–280. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00313-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lai XH, Golovliov I, Sjöstedt A. 2001. Francisella tularensis induces cytopathogenicity and apoptosis in murine macrophages via a mechanism that requires intracellular bacterial multiplication. Infect Immun 69:4691–4694. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4691-4694.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Santic M, Pavokovic G, Jones S, Asare R, Abu Kwaik Y. 2010. Regulation of apoptosis and anti-apoptosis signalling by Francisella tularensis. Microbes Infect 12:126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chong A, Wehrly TD, Child R, Hansen B, Hwang S, Virgin HW, Celli J. 2012. Cytosolic clearance of replication-deficient mutants reveals Francisella tularensis interactions with the autophagic pathway. Autophagy 8:1342–1356. doi: 10.4161/auto.20808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Case ED, Chong A, Wehrly TD, Hansen B, Child R, Hwang S, Virgin HW, Celli J. 2014. The Francisella O-antigen mediates survival in the macrophage cytosol via autophagy avoidance. Cell Microbiol 16:862–877. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cremer TJ, Amer A, Tridandapani S, Butchar JP. 2009. Francisella tularensis regulates autophagy-related host cell signaling pathways. Autophagy 5:125–128. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.1.7305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steele S, Brunton J, Ziehr B, Taft-Benz S, Moorman N, Kawula T. 2013. Francisella tularensis harvests nutrients derived via ATG5-independent autophagy to support intracellular growth. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003562. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Checroun C, Wehrly TD, Fischer ER, Hayes SF, Celli J. 2006. Autophagy-mediated reentry of Francisella tularensis into the endocytic compartment after cytoplasmic replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:14578–14583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601838103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jones BD, Faron M, Rasmussen JA, Fletcher JR. 2014. Uncovering the components of the Francisella tularensis virulence stealth strategy. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:32. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Larsson P, Oyston PC, Chain P, Chu MC, Duffield M, Fuxelius HH, Garcia E, Halltorp G, Johansson D, Isherwood KE, Karp PD, Larsson E, Liu Y, Michell S, Prior J, Prior R, Malfatti S, Sjöstedt A, Svensson K, Thompson N, Vergez L, Wagg JK, Wren BW, Lindler LE, Andersson SG, Forsman M, Titball RW. 2005. The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet 37:153–159. doi: 10.1038/ng1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nano FE, Zhang N, Cowley SC, Klose KE, Cheung KK, Roberts MJ, Ludu JS, Letendre GW, Meierovics AI, Stephens G, Elkins KL. 2004. A Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island required for intramacrophage growth. J Bacteriol 186:6430–6436. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.19.6430-6436.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nano FE, Schmerk C. 2007. The Francisella pathogenicity island. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:122–137. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sridhar S, Sharma A, Kongshaug H, Nilsen F, Jonassen I. 2012. Whole genome sequencing of the fish pathogen Francisella noatunensis subsp. orientalis Toba04 gives novel insights into Francisella evolution and pathogenicity. BMC Genomics 13:598. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Long ME, Lindemann SR, Rasmussen JA, Jones BD, Allen LA. 2013. Disruption of Francisella tularensis Schu S4 iglI, iglJ, and pdpC genes results in attenuation for growth in human macrophages and in vivo virulence in mice and reveals a unique phenotype for pdpC. Infect Immun 81:850–861. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00822-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Santic M, Molmeret M, Barker JR, Klose KE, Dekanic A, Doric M, Abu Kwaik Y. 2007. A Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island protein essential for bacterial proliferation within the host cell cytosol. Cell Microbiol 9:2391–2403. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Santic M, Molmeret M, Klose KE, Jones S, Abu Kwaik Y. 2005. The Francisella tularensis pathogenicity island protein IglC and its regulator MglA are essential for modulating phagosome biogenesis and subsequent bacterial escape into the cytoplasm. Cell Microbiol 7:969–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schmerk CL, Duplantis BN, Howard PL, Nano FE. 2009. A Francisella novicida pdpA mutant exhibits limited intracellular replication and remains associated with the lysosomal marker LAMP-1. Microbiology 155:1498–1504. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.025445-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Golovliov I, Ericsson M, Sandström G, Tarnvik A, Sjöstedt A. 1997. Identification of proteins of Francisella tularensis induced during growth in macrophages and cloning of the gene encoding a prominently induced 23-kilodalton protein. Infect Immun 65:2183–2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lai XH, Golovliov I, Sjöstedt A. 2004. Expression of IglC is necessary for intracellular growth and induction of apoptosis in murine macrophages by Francisella tularensis. Microb Pathog 37:225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Clemens DL, Ge P, Lee BY, Horwitz MA, Zhou ZH. 2015. Atomic structure of T6SS reveals interlaced array essential to function. Cell 160:940–951. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wehrly TD, Chong A, Virtaneva K, Sturdevant DE, Child R, Edwards JA, Brouwer D, Nair V, Fischer ER, Wicke L, Curda AJ, Kupko JJ III, Martens C, Crane DD, Bosio CM, Porcella SF, Celli J. 2009. Intracellular biology and virulence determinants of Francisella tularensis revealed by transcriptional profiling inside macrophages. Cell Microbiol 11:1128–1150. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01316.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brudal E, Lampe EO, Reubsaet L, Roos N, Hegna IK, Thrane IM, Koppang EO, Winther-Larsen HC. 2015. Vaccination with outer membrane vesicles from Francisella noatunensis reduces development of francisellosis in a zebrafish model. Fish Shellfish Immunol 42:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rick Lyons C, Wu TH. 2007. Animal models of Francisella tularensis infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1105:238–265. doi: 10.1196/annals.1409.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bolger CE, Forestal CA, Italo JK, Benach JL, Furie MB. 2005. The live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis replicates in human and murine macrophages but induces only the human cells to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. J Leukoc Biol 77:893–897. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1104637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Owen CR, Buker EO, Jellison WL, Lackman DB, Bell JF. 1964. Comparative studies of Francisella tularensis and Francisella novicida. J Bacteriol 87:676–683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kieffer TL, Cowley S, Nano FE, Elkins KL. 2003. Francisella novicida LPS has greater immunobiological activity in mice than F. tularensis LPS, and contributes to F. novicida murine pathogenesis. Microbes Infect 5:397–403. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Santic M, Akimana C, Asare R, Kouokam JC, Atay S, Abu Kwaik Y. 2009. Intracellular fate of Francisella tularensis within arthropod-derived cells. Environ Microbiol 11:1473–1481. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vonkavaara M, Telepnev MV, Ryden P, Sjöstedt A, Stoven S. 2008. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for elucidating the pathogenicity of Francisella tularensis. Cell Microbiol 10:1327–1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brudal E, Ulanova LS, Lampe EO, Rishovd AL, Griffiths G, Winther-Larsen HC. 2014. Establishment of three Francisella infections in zebrafish embryos at different temperatures. Infect Immun 82:2180–2194. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00077-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vojtech LN, Sanders GE, Conway C, Ostland V, Hansen JD. 2009. Host immune response and acute disease in a zebrafish model of Francisella pathogenesis. Infect Immun 77:914–925. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01201-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.El-Etr SH, Margolis JJ, Monack D, Robison RA, Cohen M, Moore E, Rasley A. 2009. Francisella tularensis type A strains cause the rapid encystment of Acanthamoeba castellanii and survive in amoebal cysts for three weeks postinfection. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7488–7500. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01829-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lauriano CM, Barker JR, Yoon SS, Nano FE, Arulanandam BP, Hassett DJ, Klose KE. 2004. MglA regulates transcription of virulence factors necessary for Francisella tularensis intraamoebae and intramacrophage survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:4246–4249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307690101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hoffmann C, Harrison CF, Hilbi H. 2014. The natural alternative: protozoa as cellular models for Legionella infection. Cell Microbiol 16:15–26. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bozzaro S, Eichinger L. 2011. The professional phagocyte Dictyostelium discoideum as a model host for bacterial pathogens. Curr Drug Targets 12:942–954. doi: 10.2174/138945011795677782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maniak M. 2002. Conserved features of endocytosis in Dictyostelium. Int Rev Cytol 221:257–287. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(02)21014-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Otto GP, Wu MY, Kazgan N, Anderson OR, Kessin RH. 2003. Macroautophagy is required for multicellular development of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. J Biol Chem 278:17636–17645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212467200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cosson P, Zulianello L, Join-Lambert O, Faurisson F, Gebbie L, Benghezal M, Van Delden C, Curty LK, Kohler T. 2002. Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence analyzed in a Dictyostelium discoideum host system. J Bacteriol 184:3027–3033. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.11.3027-3033.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hagedorn M, Soldati T. 2007. Flotillin and RacH modulate the intracellular immunity of Dictyostelium to Mycobacterium marinum infection. Cell Microbiol 9:2716–2733. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Solomon JM, Isberg RR. 2000. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in Dictyostelium discoideum: a novel system for genetic analysis of host-pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol 8:478–480. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01852-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.King JS, Gueho A, Hagedorn M, Gopaldass N, Leuba F, Soldati T, Insall RH. 2013. WASH is required for lysosomal recycling and efficient autophagic and phagocytic digestion. Mol Biol Cell 24:2714–2726. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-02-0092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vestvik N, Rønneseth A, Kalgraff CA, Winther-Larsen HC, Wergeland HI, Haugland GT. 2013. Francisella noatunensis subsp. noatunensis replicates within Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) leucocytes and inhibits respiratory burst activity. Fish Shellfish Immunol 35:725–733. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lindgren H, Honn M, Golovlev I, Kadzhaev K, Conlan W, Sjöstedt A. 2009. The 58-kilodalton major virulence factor of Francisella tularensis is required for efficient utilization of iron. Infect Immun 77:4429–4436. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00702-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Milton DL, O'Toole R, Horstedt P, Wolf-Watz H. 1996. Flagellin A is essential for the virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. J Bacteriol 178:1310–1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Simon R, Priefer U, Puhler A. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic-engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Biotechnology 1:784–791. doi: 10.1038/nbt1183-784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brudal E, Winther-Larsen HC, Colquhoun DJ, Duodu S. 2013. Evaluation of reference genes for reverse transcription quantitative PCR analyses of fish-pathogenic Francisella strains exposed to different growth conditions. BMC Res Notes 6:76. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bonquist L, Lindgren H, Golovliov I, Guina T, Sjöstedt A. 2008. MglA and Igl proteins contribute to the modulation of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain-containing phagosomes in murine macrophages. Infect Immun 76:3502–3510. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00226-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Furevik A, Pettersen EF, Colquhoun D, Wergeland HI. 2011. The intracellular lifestyle of Francisella noatunensis in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) leucocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol 30:488–494. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ravanel K, de Chassey B, Cornillon S, Benghezal M, Zulianello L, Gebbie L, Letourneur F, Cosson P. 2001. Membrane sorting in the endocytic and phagocytic pathway of Dictyostelium discoideum. Eur J Cell Biol 80:754–764. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fok AK, Clarke M, Ma L, Allen RD. 1993. Vacuolar H+-ATPase of Dictyostelium discoideum. A monoclonal antibody study. J Cell Sci 106:1103–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hagedorn M, Neuhaus EM, Soldati T. 2006. Optimized fixation and immunofluorescence staining methods for Dictyostelium cells. Methods Mol Biol 346:327–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kaech A, Ziegler U. 2014. High-pressure freezing: current state and future prospects. Methods Mol Biol 1117:151–171. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-776-1_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hohenberg H, Mannweiler K, Muller M. 1994. High-pressure freezing of cell suspensions in cellulose capillary tubes. J Microsc 175:34–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1994.tb04785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Leonidova A, Pierroz V, Rubbiani R, Lan YJ, Schmitz AG, Kaech A, Sigel RKO, Ferrari S, Gasser G. 2014. Photo-induced uncaging of a specific Re(I) organometallic complex in living cells. Chem Sci 5:4044–4056. doi: 10.1039/C3SC53550A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Duodu S, Larsson P, Sjödin A, Soto E, Forsman M, Colquhoun DJ. 2012. Real-time PCR assays targeting unique DNA sequences of fish-pathogenic Francisella noatunensis subspecies noatunensis and orientalis. Dis Aquat Organ 101:225–234. doi: 10.3354/dao02514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Damer CK, Bayeva M, Kim PS, Ho LK, Eberhardt ES, Socec CI, Lee JS, Bruce EA, Goldman-Yassen AE, Naliboff LC. 2007. Copine A is required for cytokinesis, contractile vacuole function, and development in Dictyostelium. Eukaryot Cell 6:430–442. doi: 10.1128/EC.00322-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ashworth JM, Watts DJ. 1970. Metabolism of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum grown in axenic culture. Biochem J 119:175–182. doi: 10.1042/bj1190175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lindgren H. 2004. Factors affecting the escape of Francisella tularensis from the phagolysosome. J Med Microbiol 53:953–958. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Beyenbach KW, Wieczorek H. 2006. The V-type H+ ATPase: molecular structure and function, physiological roles and regulation. J Exp Biol 209:577–589. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lukacs GL, Rotstein OD, Grinstein S. 1990. Phagosomal acidification is mediated by a vacuolar-type H+-ATPase in murine macrophages. J Biol Chem 265:21099–21107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Clarke M, Maddera L, Engel U, Gerisch G. 2010. Retrieval of the vacuolar H+-ATPase from phagosomes revealed by live cell imaging. PLoS One 5:e8585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gotthardt D, Warnatz HJ, Henschel O, Bruckert F, Schleicher M, Soldati T. 2002. High-resolution dissection of phagosome maturation reveals distinct membrane trafficking phases. Mol Biol Cell 13:3508–3520. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-04-0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pang KM, Lee E, Knecht DA. 1998. Use of a fusion protein between GFP and an actin-binding domain to visualize transient filamentous-actin structures. Curr Biol 8:405–408. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cemma M, Brumell JH. 2012. Interactions of pathogenic bacteria with autophagy systems. Curr Biol 22:R540–R545. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Otto GP, Wu MY, Kazgan N, Anderson OR, Kessin RH. 2004. Dictyostelium macroautophagy mutants vary in the severity of their developmental defects. J Biol Chem 279:15621–15629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311139200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Froquet R, Cherix N, Burr SE, Frey J, Vilches S, Tomas JM, Cosson P. 2007. Alternative host model to evaluate Aeromonas virulence. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5657–5659. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00908-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hasselbring BM, Patel MK, Schell MA. 2011. Dictyostelium discoideum as a model system for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence factors. Infect Immun 79:2079–2088. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01233-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, Brooks TM, McAuley SB, Pukatzki S. 2011. Vibrio cholerae requires the type VI secretion system virulence factor VasX to kill Dictyostelium discoideum. Infect Immun 79:2941–2949. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01266-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pan YJ, Lin TL, Hsu CR, Wang JT. 2011. Use of a Dictyostelium model for isolation of genetic loci associated with phagocytosis and virulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun 79:997–1006. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00906-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.MacGurn JA, Hsu PC, Emr SD. 2012. Ubiquitin and membrane protein turnover: from cradle to grave. Annu Rev Biochem 81:231–259. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060210-093619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Collins CA, De Maziere A, van Dijk S, Carlsson F, Klumperman J, Brown EJ. 2009. Atg5-independent sequestration of ubiquitinated mycobacteria. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000430. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rupper A, Cardelli J. 2001. Regulation of phagocytosis and endo-phagosomal trafficking pathways in Dictyostelium discoideum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1525:205–216. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(01)00106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Clarke M. 2010. Recent insights into host-pathogen interactions from Dictyostelium. Cell Microbiol 12:283–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Fey P, Dodson RJ, Basu S, Chisholm RL. 2013. One stop shop for everything Dictyostelium: dictyBase and the Dicty Stock Center in 2012. Methods Mol Biol 983:59–92. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-302-2_4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Reddy TBK, Thomas AD, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Isbandi M, Jansson J, Mallajosyula J, Pagani I, Lobos EA, Kyrpides NC. 2015. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1099–D1106. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material
Download video file (4.4MB, avi)
Download video file (6.2MB, avi)

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES