Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2016 Oct 5;4:e2555. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2555

Identification and temporal expression of putative circadian clock transcripts in the amphipod crustacean Talitrus saltator

Joseph F O’Grady 1, Laura S Hoelters 1, Martin T Swain 1, David C Wilcockson 1,
Editor: Juan Riesgo-Escovar
PMCID: PMC5068443  PMID: 27761341

Abstract

Background

Talitrus saltator is an amphipod crustacean that inhabits the supralittoral zone on sandy beaches in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. T. saltator exhibits endogenous locomotor activity rhythms and time-compensated sun and moon orientation, both of which necessitate at least one chronometric mechanism. Whilst their behaviour is well studied, currently there are no descriptions of the underlying molecular components of a biological clock in this animal, and very few in other crustacean species.

Methods

We harvested brain tissue from animals expressing robust circadian activity rhythms and used homology cloning and Illumina RNAseq approaches to sequence and identify the core circadian clock and clock-related genes in these samples. We assessed the temporal expression of these genes in time-course samples from rhythmic animals using RNAseq.

Results

We identified a comprehensive suite of circadian clock gene homologues in T. saltator including the ‘core’ clock genes period (Talper), cryptochrome 2 (Talcry2), timeless (Taltim), clock (Talclk), and bmal1 (Talbmal1). In addition we describe the sequence and putative structures of 23 clock-associated genes including two unusual, extended isoforms of pigment dispersing hormone (Talpdh). We examined time-course RNAseq expression data, derived from tissues harvested from behaviourally rhythmic animals, to reveal rhythmic expression of these genes with approximately circadian period in Talper and Talbmal1. Of the clock-related genes, casein kinase IIβ (TalckIIβ), ebony (Talebony), jetlag (Taljetlag), pigment dispensing hormone (Talpdh), protein phosphatase 1 (Talpp1), shaggy (Talshaggy), sirt1 (Talsirt1), sirt7 (Talsirt7) and supernumerary limbs (Talslimb) show temporal changes in expression.

Discussion

We report the sequences of principle genes that comprise the circadian clock of T. saltator and highlight the conserved structural and functional domains of their deduced cognate proteins. Our sequencing data contribute to the growing inventory of described comparative clocks. Expression profiling of the identified clock genes illuminates tantalising targets for experimental manipulation to elucidate the molecular and cellular control of clock-driven phenotypes in this crustacean.

Keywords: Circadian, Crustacean, Talitrus saltator, Transcriptome, Rhythms

Introduction

Nearly all organisms are exposed to monotonous cyclic alterations in their environment. Competence to gate behaviour and physiology in tune with these changes is orchestrated by so-called circadian clocks, the cardinal features of which are: the clock mechanism is autonomous and endogenous i.e., it persists in the absence of external cues; the period of the rhythm is temperature compensated and is entrained by relevant cyclic environmental cues. For example, in the terrestrial realm, organisms invariably exhibit daily activity rhythms in temporal correspondence to the light and dark of day and night. Our understanding of the molecular and cellular underpinnings of circadian clocks has advanced tremendously in recent years and comparative studies have benefitted from the advent of next generation sequencing strategies to reveal clock genes in non-model species, including crustaceans (Christie et al., 2013; De Pitta et al., 2013; Nesbit & Christie, 2014; Toullec et al., 2013).

In the fruit fly brain about 150 cells, primarily in the protocerebrum and optic lobe, contribute to the central clock oscillatory system, although this number varies throughout arthropods. Indeed, in some Lepidoptera (Sauman et al., 2005) and Crustacea (Beckwith et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2013) this number seems to be much lower. The consensus arthropod model of the central oscillatory mechanism is based on transcriptional/translational feedback loops (TTFLs), with positive loops driving the expression of negative factors that feed-back to inhibit the positive loops and hence their own transcription. Despite interspecific variation, the principle mechanisms and components are conserved across diverse taxa (For reviews, see Allada & Chung, 2010; Hardin, 2009; Sandrelli et al., 2008). Briefly, in Drosophila the transcription factors CLOCK and CYCLE (CLK and CYC) drive the expression of period (per) and timeless (tim). The translation of per and tim throughout the evening and early night results in the cytoplasmic accumulation of their cognate proteins that subsequently form stable heterodimers and translocate to the nucleus where they interfere with the action of CLK and CYC to inhibit their own transcription. Under constant conditions such as DD, this autoregulatory feedback loop takes circa 24 h to complete due to the opposing phosphorylation and dephosphorylation actions of various casein kinases and phosphatases that alter circadian protein stability. For example, the stability of PER is facilitated by casein kinase 1ε (CK1ε) or DOUBLETIME (DBT) phosphorylation and translocation of the PER/TIM dimer is mediated by phosphorylation via glycogen synthase kinase β or “SHAGGY” (SGG). In fruit flies maintained under LD conditions the blue light activated flavoprotein cryptochrome (dCRY1) acts as a transduction pathway to relay photic stimuli to the TTFL. When photo-activated at dawn dCRY1 facilitates the degradation of TIM, via the CRYPTOCHROME/JETLAG (JET) complex. This consequently leads to destabilisation of PER, which is ubiquitinated by E3 ubiquitin ligase SUPERNUMERARY LIMBS (SLIMB), and degraded via the proteasome. The resultant de-repression of dCLOCK and dCYCLE ‘resets’ the clock at dawn synchronising (or entraining) the system to the ambient conditions. Protein phosphatases (PP) including PP2A and PP1 regulate these phosphorylation events and so their action contributes to the temporal control of the feedback loops. A secondary negative loop also governs precisely timed oscillations; the CLK-CYC heterodimer initiates the transcription of the basic zipper (bZip) activator PAR domain protein 1ε (PDP1ε) and bZip transcriptional repressor vrille (vri) (Blau & Young, 1999) by binding E-boxes in the vri promoter. VRI accumulation culminates in the repression of clk transcription by binding VRI/PAR domain protein 1ε (PDP1ε) promoters (Cyran et al., 2003). VRI dependent repression also mediates transcription of output mRNAs that cycle in phase with clk, such as cryptochrome (Glossop et al., 2003). In mammals and some arthropods, CRYPTOCHROME 2 (CRY2) acts as a negative repressor of the CLK/BMAL positive loop. In flies the actions of CLK/CYC E-boxes are also targeted by a basic-helix-loop-helix repressor, CLOCKWORK ORANGE (CWO), which is thought to sustain rhythmicity (Kadener et al., 2007; Lim et al., 2007; Matsumoto et al., 2007).

In insects, the octadecapeptide pigment dispersing factor (PDF) that occurs in subsets of clock neurons plays pivotal roles in synchronising oscillator neurons in the clock network. Perturbation of PDF function leads to arrhythmicity or incompetence to adjust phase and period of rhythmic phenotypes to changing environmental cues (Shafer & Yao, 2014). PDF, or rather the orthologous pigment dispersing hormone (PDH) was first discovered in crustaceans where they play a neurohormonal role as well as a neuromodulatory function, effecting dispersion of retinal pigments and integumental chromatophores, including the diurnal rhythm of this action. In crustaceans, PDHs occur in several isoforms and the neuroarchitecture of PDH cells is more complex than for PDF, suggesting additional functions to pigment dispersion. However, the defined role(s) for PDH in rhythmic phenotypes of crustaceans remains poorly described (Beckwith et al., 2011; Strauss & Dircksen, 2010; Wilcockson et al., 2011)

Talitrus saltator lives in the sandy substratum of the supralittoral zone of beaches on the European Atlantic coast and in the Mediterranean. During the day it remains buried in the sand, emerging after dark to make foraging excursions along the land-beach axis. Before dawn it relocates to its burrowing zone to seek refuge, reinterred in the sand. This circadian locomotor activity persists in the absence of external cues and is thus endogenously driven (Bregazzi & Naylor, 1972; Edwards & Naylor, 1987). Remarkably, T. saltator also maintains its preferred position on the shore by orientating using visual cues such as the sun and moon as a compass guide (Pardi & Papi, 1952; Ugolini, 2003; Ugolini et al., 1999; Ugolini, Melis & Innocenti, 1999; Ugolini et al., 2007). This capability necessitates compensation for azimuthal changes over time (Ugolini, Tiribilli & Boddi, 2002). Thus, these clock-controlled phenotypes contribute to the fitness of T. saltator.

The well-defined behavioural phenotypes of T. saltator enable a range of comparisons with other organisms to be drawn. For example, another peracarid crustacean, the isopod Eurydice pulchra possesses independent circatidal and circadian clocks (Zhang et al., 2013) and the staggering time-compensated navigational mechanisms of the monarch butterfly (Reppert, 2006) are comparable to those of T. saltator. This brings the relevance of comparative clock biology sharply into focus; detailed analysis of a diverse non-model species may reveal commonalities or differences that give insight into how each has evolved and functions. Thus, T. saltator represents an excellent, tractable model for time-compensated orientation.

Despite decades of elaborate behavioural analyses, the molecular basis of clock-driven behavioural phenotypes in T. saltator is not understood, even at the most fundamental level. Therefore, we sought to elucidate the sequences of canonical clock genes and their temporal expression dynamics in T. saltator to provide a platform from which to explore the neuromolecular mechanisms of circadian clock mediated phenotypes in this animal. This work contributes also to the steadily growing inventory of crustacean transcriptomes and is applicable to further exploration of comparative chronobiology and animal orientation in a tractable and ecologically important model.

Materials and Methods

Animal husbandry, tissue sampling and RNA extraction

Animals were caught by hand from Ynyslas beach, Wales, UK at night during their active period and returned to glass tanks containing damp sand at ambient temperature (17 °C) and a 12:12 LD regime. Lighting at dawn and dusk was ramped/dimmed over 30 min to approximate natural conditions. Animals were fed fish food flakes ad libitum. After seven days acclimation, the rhythmic emergence and locomotor activity of a sub-sample of 60 animals was established. T. saltator has been shown to express more robust and less variable locomotor rhythms in small groups (Bregazzi & Naylor, 1972). Therefore, animals were housed in groups of five in a glass tank containing 10 cm-deep damp sand and compartmentalized with Plexiglas dividers. Across each compartment, infrared beams were passed via bespoke recording apparatus fabricated by Trikinetics (Waltham, MA, USA). All activity, registered as interruptions to infrared beams was recorded via proprietary software on a stand-alone PC. Activity data were recorded in one minute bins and was analysed and plotted using ClockLab software (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL, USA) run via Matlab® v6.2. T. saltator brains were rapidly dissected from animals drawn from the population shown to be behaviourally rhythmic (see above). Dissections were done in ice-chilled DEPC treated physiological saline. Ten brains were pooled to form each replicate at 3-hour intervals and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen before storing at −80 °C until use.

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol® (Invitrogen ™, Thermo Fisher, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions except that an additional wash step in 75% ethanol of the RNA pellet was introduced prior to drying and rehydration in 30μl DEPC-treated water. All RNA samples were treated with Turbo DNA-free ™(Ambion®, Thermo Fisher, Hampshire, UK) to remove contaminating DNA. RNA was then pooled for degenerate PCR, RACE PCR and Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencing, whilst RNA time-course samples were prepared separately for temporal expression analysis.

Degenerate PCR

Initially we used a strategy of degenerate PCR and 5 and 3 Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) to identify full-length core canonical clock genes. Full details of the PCR conditions used can be found in File S1 and primers used are tabulated in Table S1.

Illumina RNAseq protocol

The TruSeq cDNA library preparation protocol (Illumina, Cambridge, UK) was carried out on eight time-point samples according to manufacturer’s instructions. Amplified cDNA was run on a 1% agarose gel to validate correct library size range. The cDNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina RNA TruSeq sequencer (Illumina Inc.) and quality checked at Aberystwyth University’s Core Genomics Facility. Read library quality was investigated using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), thereafter all samples were pooled and de novo transcriptome assembly was performed with Trinity software, version 2012-10-05 (Grabherr et al., 2011). Transcripts smaller than 300 bases were removed from the pooled assembly. This consisted of 186,495 contigs with a mean length of 1,215 bp pairs and an assembly N50 statistic of 2,371 bp.

Transcriptome mining and sequence analysis

Assembled contigs were initially interrogated for canonical clock gene transcripts using the programme BioEdit (Hall, 1999), Basic local alignment (BLAST) searches (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) were done using Drosophila melanogaster protein sequences as search terms and tblastn search functions set with default parameters (e-value threshold at 1e−100 except for PDH, where stringency was relaxed to 1000). Where no sequence information was available for Drosophila (e.g., cryptochrome 2) alternative arthropod sequences were used, details of which are given in Table 1. Contigs were translated using EXPASY Translate tool (http://web.expasy.org/translate/) and the coding sequences checked manually using blastP for homology to known circadian proteins.

Table 1. Identified putative Talitrus saltator circadian protein-encoding transcripts.

Clock gene query protein Transcriptome search sequence Accession No. (all D. melanogaster) Talitrus transcript/protein identifications
Transcript Protein
Trinity contig ID Lengtha RACE Name CDS Lengthb
Core clock proteins
CRY2 n/ac comp100937_c0_seq1c comp102609_c0_seq3c 1,843 5+ 3 Tal-CRY2 Full 565
CLOCK AAC62234 comp100688_c1_seq1 5,723 3d Tal-CLK Partial 1,907
PERIOD AAF45804 comp102279_c0_seq7 8,001 Tal-PER Full 1,557
TIMELESS AAC46920 comp849619_c0_seq1 1,209 Tal-TIM Partial 402
CYCLE AAF49107 comp12103_c0_seq1 1,807e Tal-BMAL1 Full 602
comp939723_c0_seq1
Clock-associated proteins
PDH n/af comp92607_c0_seq2 2,471g 5+ 3d Tal-PDH I Full 129
comp97165_c0_seq3 3,392 Tal-PDH II Full 89
CASEIN KINASE 2 α AAN11415 comp102480_c0_seq1 5,147 Tal-CK2 α Full 353
CASEIN KINASE 2 β AAF48093 comp99101_c0_seq3 1,567 Tal-CK2 β Full 220
CLOCKWORK ORANGE AAF54527 comp1009591_c0_seq1 503 Tal-CWO Partial 167
DOUBLETIME (or CK1 ε) AAF57110 comp87763_c0_seq1 1,092 Tal-DBT Full 310
PDP1 ε AAF04509 comp98345_c0_seq1 3,423 Tal-PDP1 ε Full 508
PP1 CAA39820 comp97405_c0_seq1 1,725 Tal-PP1 Full 357
PP2A –subunit MICROTUBULE STAR AAF52567 comp98380_c0_seq1 2,981 Tal-MTS Full 309
PP2A –subunit WIDERBORST AAF56720 comp102157_c1_seq1 2,474 Tal-WBT Full 458
PP2A –subunit TWINS AAF54498 comp99704_c0_seq3 1,633 Tal-TWS Full 445
SHAGGY AAN09084 comp99811_c0_seq7 4,413 Tal-SGG Full 418
SUPERNUMERARY LIMBS AAF55853 comp98870_c0_seq1 2,121 Tal-SLIMB Full 588
VRILLE AAF52237 comp100474_c0_seq6 3,949 Tal-VRI Full 509
EBONY AAF55870 comp99283_c0_seq2 4,380 Tal-EBONY Full 974
RORA NP_788301 comp99654_c0_seq3 2,217 Tal-RORA Partial 599
REVERB NP_730321 comp101252_c0_seq2 5,385 Tal-REVERB Full 1,110
SIRT1 NP_477351 comp101818_c1_seq1 4,033 Tal-SIRT1 Partial 955
SIRT2 NP_650880 comp97450_c0_seq4 2,275 Tal-SIRT2 Partial 376
SIRT4 NP_572241 comp92313_c0_seq2 2,977 Tal-SIRT4 Partial 354
SIRT6 NP_649990 comp69157_c0_seq1 1,209 Tal-SIRT6 Partial 402
SIRT7 NP_651664 comp95761_c0_seq1 5,180 Tal-SIRT7 Partial 948
JETLAG NP_608880 comp100423_c0_seq4 2,454 Tal-JET Partial 458

Notes.

a

length in nucleotides.

b

length in amino acids.

c

Homology cloning sequence used to search transcriptome. Trinity contigs likely from misassembly, other gene details stated taken from homology cloning and RACE PCR.

d

Trinity contig extended 3 sequence past RACE-derived sequence, other gene details stated taken from contig sequence.

e

Overlapping contigs combined.

f

Uca pugilator octadecapeptide β-PDH consensus sequence used.

g

Includes combined contig sequence and overlapping 5 RACE sequence.

EMBL SMART (Letunic, Doerks & Bork, 2009) servers were used to detect and analyse the conserved functional domains and motifs of clock proteins. Deduced T. saltator protein sequences were used to query the FlyBase (http://flybase.org) and NCBI non-redundant protein databases using the blastp algorithm. The identity and similarity between protein sequences were calculated using EMBOSS Pairwise Alignment Algorithms (http://www.ebi.ac.uk). The server SignalP v.4 (Petersen et al., 2011) was used to predict the presence and location of signal peptide cleavage sites.

Quantitation of transcript abundance

Using the Trinity downstream analysis tools, reads from each time-point were mapped to the pooled assembly and transcript abundance estimation was carried out using RSEM (Li & Dewey, 2011). In this way the FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of exon per Million fragments mapped) values were calculated for each time point. Following this TPM values (transcripts per million) were calculated following Wagner, Kin & Lynch (2012). Quantitative PCR methods for TPM validation are given in File S1 and primers in Table S1. All data files for time-course RNAseq can be found on the NCBI SRA data base, bioproject Accession No. 297565.

Blast2GO analysis- transcriptome annotation

Before running Blast2GO, the number of transcripts was further reduced by clustering them using CD-HIT-EST (version 4.5.4) with default options except for the sequence identity threshold, which was set to 95% (Li & Godzik, 2006; Li, Jaroszewski & Godzik, 2001). The clustering step removes very similar splice variants, which may include some misassemblies, and it significantly reduces the number of transcripts to be included in the time-consuming BLAST analysis. In total 156,766 transcripts with a mean length of 1,534 bp and an assembly N50 statistic of 968 bp were run through BLAST. Using the BLAST output the transcripts were annotated using BLAST2GO software (Conesa et al., 2005; Gotz et al., 2008) including reports for Gene Ontology (GO) terms and EC numbers for the KEGG pathway. The BLAST2GO cut-off parameters used to filter out poor quality BLAST hits for the annotation were as follows: Annotation rule cut-off = 55; E-value = 1e–6; Hit-HSP overlap = 0; and the GO weight = 5.

Determining cycling transcripts

Rhythmicity in clock gene expression was determined using the JTK_CYCLE software (http://openwetware.org/wiki/HughesLab:JTK_Cycle) developed by Professors Michael E. Hughes, Karl Kornacker and John Hogenesch (Hughes, Hogenesch & Kornacker, 2010; Miyazaki et al., 2011) following the JTK_CYCLE Users guide. Changes in gene expression values (TPM) were also analysed by one-way ANOVA.

Data availability

Raw data files have been deposited in public sequencing databases as indicated in the text or at https://figshare.com/s/a2513243c63bf557b720.

Results

Animals entrained under 12:12LD regimes showed robust activity rhythms when released into constant darkness (DD) with peak activity occurring in the middle of the subjective night (Fig. 1A). Periodogram analysis of representative animals revealed a period (tau) of 24.15 h (Fig. 1B). The demonstration of rhythmicity in these animals was essential to our sampling strategy; tissue for gene discovery was taken across one complete daily cycle and pooled to ensure capture of transiently expressed transcripts. Additionally, expression profiling of transcriptome contigs required samples harvested from rhythmic animals in-phase with respect to each other.

Figure 1. Talitrus saltator exhibits free-running circadian locomotor activity rhythms.

Figure 1

(A) Plots of activity in five representative animals removed from the shore and held in DD over 9 days. Grey and black bars show time of subjective night and day, respectively. (B) Chi Square Periodogram analysis of activity data of five representative animals recorded in DD over nine days. The period of activity (τ) is shown inside the plot. Red line represents significance at P < 0.001.

Identification of putative Talitrus saltator circadian proteins

Our principle objective was to describe the cDNAs encoding the core elements of the circadian clock system in T. saltator, initially adopting homology cloning and standard sequencing approach but, subsequently superseded by RNAseq strategies. The Illumina RNAseq generated 141,769,456 reads, 128,386,193 of these were assembled into 156,766 clustered contigs (minimum length 300 bp). This T. saltator Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the Accession No. GDUJ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, GDUJ01000000. From this transcriptome we identified contigs encoding putative circadian clock genes (Table 1). The coding regions and conserved functional domains of identified ‘core’ clock genes period (Talper), timeless (Taltim), cryptochrome2 (Talcry2) and bmal1 (Talbmal1) and clock (Talclk) are diagrammatically represented in Fig. 2. In the interests of space, alignments of all genes (core and clock-related) are shown in Figs. S1S26 and all BLAST results are tabulated in Tables S2S4.

Figure 2. Cartoon representing conserved domains of core clock gene proteins.

Figure 2

Putative Talitrus saltator core clock protein amino acid sequences aligned with other arthropod circadian clock protein sequences. SMART identified domains are coloured (see key for colours corresponding to domains). Tal, Talitrus saltator; Dp, Daphnia pulex; Ep, Eurydice pulchra; Drom, Drosophila melanogaster; Dplex, Danaus plexippus; Tc, Tribolium castaneum; Ae, Aedes aegypti.

Cryptochrome 2

Degenerate PCR coupled with RACE PCR yielded a 1,843 bp cDNA sequence coding for a 565 amino acid protein; a putative cryptochrome 2 assigned TalCRY2. An identical sequence was revealed in the transcriptome data but assembled as two separate contigs (Table 1). High fidelity PCR amplification and sequencing confirmed that Talcry2 is expressed as one contiguous transcript. The deduced protein sequence contains two SMART identified domains, a DNA photolyase domain and a FAD binding 7 domain (Figs. 2 and S1) and shared an identity of 46.4% and a similarity of 56.0% with Danaus plexippus CRY2 (Accession No. ABA62409; Zhu et al., 2005). The highest sequence identity protein in the NCBI non-redundant database is that for the closely related isopod crustacean, Eurydice pulchra CRY2 sequence (Accession No. AGV28717; Zhang et al., 2013).

Period and timeless

For Talper we mined an 8,001 bp contig encoding a putative full-length protein of 1557 amino acids aligning to dPER with an identity of 29% and a similarity of 50%. The deduced TalPER contains characteristic features of PER proteins including two PAS domains and a PAC domain as well as nuclear export signal, cytoplasmic localization and nuclear localization signal motifs. In common with the isopod E. pulchra, TalPER also has a CK1ε binding site sequence and Period C domain (Figs. 2 and S2). The putative TalPER sequence aligned most closely to dPER-PB in FlyBase (FlyBase No. FBpp0304590) and in the NCBI database to Eurydice pulchra PER (Accession No. AGV28714; Zhang et al., 2013). We also used the Drosophila melanogaster TIM (dTIM) protein (Accession No. AAC46920; Myers et al., 1995) as a search term to identify a 1,209 bp contig with a coding region for a 402 amino acid protein sharing sequence similarity to dTIM (identity of 24.3% and similarity of 41.0%, Fig. S3). SMART analysis of this sequence identified a 228 amino acid Timeless domain (Figs. 2 and S3). The partial protein sequence, assigned TalTIM aligned most closely in the NCBI database to the partial Timeless-like protein of the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis (Accession No. KDR17447; Terrapon et al., 2014) and in FlyBase to Timeout-PA (FlyBase No. FBpp0082180).

Clock

Using the D. melanogaster CLK (dCLK) sequence (Accession No. AAC62234; Bae et al., 1998) as search term, a single 5,723 bp contig was identified as a candidate TalCLK encoding sequence. However, this sequence lacked a stop codon and we were unable to deduce the C-terminal end of the protein, which is missing a C-terminal transactivation domain (Figs. 2 and S4). Nevertheless, our partial sequence contains SMART identified domains including one PAS domain, one PAC domain and coiled coil domains, whilst missing a bHLH domain and a second PAS domain present in dCLK. The TalCLK PAS domain is likely homologous to the PAS-2 domain of dCLK as it aligned better (identity of 64.2% and a similarity of 80.6%) than it did to the PAS-1 domain (identity of 17.3% and a similarity of 36.0%). Moreover, the PAC domains align closely with an identity of 75.0% and a similarity of 90.9% to that of dCLK. The most significant hit for TalCLK in the NCBI database was CLK of the prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Accession No. AAX44045; Yang et al., 2006). In FlyBase the most similar protein is the D. melanogaster CLK orthologue (FlyBase No. FBpp0306710).

Cycle/Bmal1

By searching the transcriptome using the Drosophila melanogaster CYC (dCYC) sequence (Accession No. AAF49107; Adams et al., 2000), we identified two contigs as potential TalCYC/BMAL encoding sequences each of which aligned closely to separate regions of dCYC (Figs. 2 and S5). In fact these two contigs, when correctly oriented, overlap to form one contiguous sequence encoding a characteristic bHLH domain, two PAS domains a PAC and a C terminal transactivation domain. This sequence was confirmed by standard, Hi-fidelity PCR, cloning and sequencing. TalBMAL1 aligned with identity of 43% and similarity of 57% to BMAL1 of signal crayfish Pacifasticus leniusculus (Accession No. AFV39705). TalBMAL1 aligned with 44% identity 58% similarity to E. pulchra BMAL1.

In addition to the ‘core’ clock elements, we also isolated a comprehensive suite of ‘clock-associated’ transcripts from contigs that conceptually translate to proteins known to contribute to circadian clock functioning (Table 1). In the interests of space, we refer the reader to the Supplemental Information; herein the majority of detail is omitted from the text. Sequence alignments are displayed in Figs. S6S26 whilst BLAST search outputs of identified contig sequences to nucleotide, protein and FlyBase repositories are given in Tables S2S4.

Casein Kinase II (CKII) α and β subunits

We identified single contigs coding for putative CK11α and CKIIβ. For CK11α we found a 5,147 bp contig enveloping a coding sequence for a 353 amino acid protein including a highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain (Table 1; Fig S6). This putative TalCKIIα sequence aligned in the NCBI database most closely to human CK2 Chain A (Accession No. 1NA7_A; Niefind et al., 1998) and CKIIα from the copepod crustacean, Paracyclopina nana (Accession No. AII16523). For CKIIβ we identified a 1,567 bp coding sequence for a 220 amino acid protein, including a casein kinase regulatory subunit domain (Table 1; Fig. S6). This sequence aligned most closely in the NCBI database to parasitic wood wasp Orussus abietinus CKIIβ (Accession No. XP_012287730).

Clockwork orange (CWO)

A candidate cwo contig was mined that encodes a partial protein sequence of 167 amino acids (Table 1; Fig. S7) and included a SMART-identified bHLH domain and the Orange of the Hairy/E (SPL) family domain. TalCWO matched most closely in the NCBI database to an uncharacterized protein from the mite Metaseiulus occidentalis (Accession No. XP_003744690); however, the same sequence aligned with CLOCKWORK ORANGE from the firebug Pyrrhocoris apterus (Accession No. AGI17571; Bajgar, Jindra & Dolezel, 2013) with an e value of 8e−42.

Doubletime (DBT)

A putative 1,092 bp dbt contig coding for a deduced a full-length 310 amino acid protein was identified containing a serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain (Table 1; Fig. S8). The deduced sequence aligned most closely in the NCBI database to DBT of the isopod crustacean Eurydice pulchra (Accession No. AGV28719; Zhang et al., 2013) and in FlyBase to the Drosophila melanogaster orthologue DCO (FlyBase No. FBpp0306615).

Par domain protein 1ε (PDP1ε)

A single putative 3,423 bp pdp1ε contig with a coding sequence for a 508 amino acid protein was identified containing a basic leucine zipper domain in the C-terminal region (Table 1; Fig. S9). The deduced TalPDP1ε protein sequence aligned most closely in the NCBI database to the hepatic leukaemia factor of the clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi (Accession No. EZA50108; Oxley et al., 2014); however PDP1ε from the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Accession No. XP_001865130) was also a top ranking BLAST hit aligned with an e value of 1e−35. In FlyBase the sequence aligned most closely to Drosophila melanogaster PDP1 (FlyBase No. FBpp0289727).

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1)

A 1,725 bp contig was identified coding for a 357 putative PP1 containing a protein phosphatase 2Ac catalytic domain of the serine/threonine phosphatase family (Table 1; Fig. S10). The translated sequence aligned most closely to PP1 of the jumping ant Harpegnathos saltator (Accession No. EFN86649; Bonasio et al., 2010) in the NCBI database. In FlyBase the sequence aligned most closely to Drosophila melanogaster PP1 (FlyBase No. FBpp0306442).

Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)

PP2A catalytic subunit “MICROTUBULE STAR” (MTS)

The Drosophila melanogaster MTS sequence (dMTS, Accession No. AAF52567; Adams et al., 2000), was used as a search term to identify a contig 2,981 bp in length and coding for a putative 309 orthologue to dMTS with an identity of 91.9% and a similarity of 96.8% (Table 1; Fig. S11). The putative TalPP2A includes a protein phosphatase 2Ac catalytic domain of the serine/threonine phosphatase family with an identity of 93.4% and a similarity of 98.2% to the fruit fly orthologue. The closest match in the NCBI database was the putative serine/threonine protein phosphatase PP-V from the body louse Pediculus humanus corporis (Accession No. XP_002426726). The closest match in FlyBase was the Drosophila melanogaster MTS homologue (FlyBase No. FBpp0310063).

PP2A catalytic subunit “WIDERBORST” (WBT)

We identified a 2,474 bp sequence that codes for a putative 458 amino acid protein. The deduced protein sequence, although 66 amino acids shorter than that of Drosophila WBT (the TalWBT protein lacks a sequence at the C terminal end) aligned with the fruit fly orthologue (identity of 73.8%) % (Table 1; Fig. S12). In common with other species, the T. saltator candidate contains B56 domains (serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit epsilon). The deduced TalWBT protein aligned most closely in the NCBI database to serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit epsilon of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Accession No. XP_971164) and in FlyBase to Drosophila melanogaster WBT (FlyBase No. FBpp0084575).

PP2A catalytic subunit TWINS (TWS)

A unique 1,633 bp contig coding for a putative 445 amino acid protein with high identity to Drosophila TWS, (Table 1; Fig. S13) was identified. The deduced sequence contained seven WD40 domains identified using SMART. The protein aligned most closely in the NCBI database to PP2A subunit B of the mud crab Scylla paramamosain (Accession No. AFK24473) and to Drosophila melanogaster TWINS (FlyBase No. FBpp0081671).

Shaggy (SGG)

A 4,413 bp transcript incorporating a coding region for a 418 amino acid protein that contained a SMART identified serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain (Table 1; Fig. S14). In the NCBI database, the sequence aligned most closely to glycogen synthase kinase-3 of the turnip sawfly Athalia rosae (Accession No. XP_012256017) and in FlyBase to Drosophila melanogaster SGG (FlyBase No. FBpp0070450).

Supernumerary limbs (SLIMB)

A candidate 588 amino acid putative SLIMB protein encoded within a 2,121 bp contig was mined. This sequence included one D domain of beta-TrCP, one F box and seven WD40 domains (Table 1; Fig. S15). The deduced sequence aligned in the NCBI database most closely to F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 1A of the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis (Accession No. KDR19729; Terrapon et al., 2014) and in FlyBase to Drosophila melanogaster SLIMB (FlyBase No. FBpp0303082).

Vrille (VRI)

A single 3,949 bp contig incorporating coding sequence for a 509 amino acid protein was identified as a putative vrille transcript. The putative TalVRI protein contains a SMART identified basic region leucine zipper domain (Table 1; Fig. S16) and aligned most closely in the NCBI database to nuclear factor interleukin-3-regulated protein of the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis (Accession No. KDR19729; Terrapon et al., 2014) and in FlyBase to Drosophila melanogaster VRI (FBpp0312171).

Ebony

A single 4,380 bp contig coding for a putative 974 amino acid protein with one AMP binding domain, one AMP binding C domain and one PP binding domain was mined (Table 1; Fig. S17). The deduced protein most closely aligned in the NCBI database to the β-alanyl conjugating enzyme of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. P. americana EBONY (Accession No. CAI26307; Blenau & Baumann, 2005) has been shown to have β-alanyl-dopamine (DA) synthase (BAS) enzymatic activity and the Drosophila melanogaster EBONY sequence (Accession No. ABO27280) aligned with the TalEBONY candidate sequence with an e value of 8e−90, supported by EBONY (FlyBase No. FBpp0083505) being the most closely aligned protein to the TalEBONY query in FlyBase.

Pigment dispersing hormone 1 and II (PDHI and PDHII)

In the Trinity assembly, a 2,430 bp contig was identified by searching for the conserved NSELINS domain. The identified contig included a coding region for a putative 129 amino acid TalPDH prepropeptide (TalPDH-I, Table 1, Fig. S18). This was subsequently extended to 2,471 bp by the addition of a 5 UTR by RACE PCR. The TalPDH-I contains a signal peptide between residues 20–21, a 77 amino acid PDH-precursor-related peptide (PPRP) sequence ending in a K-R dibasic cleavage site. Unusually however, the deduced mature peptide sequence is 32 amino acids long and lacks an amidation signal. SMART identified PDH domains are present in the TalPDH. The deduced 32 amino acid Tal-PDH-I mature peptide has an identity of 40.6% and a similarity of 53.1% with the Uca pugilator β-PDH consensus sequence.

A second putative TalPDH encoding transcript was found in the transcriptome of 3,392 bp in length that included a coding region for an 89 amino acid prepropeptide that we assigned TalPDH-II (Table 1; Fig. S18). This prepropeptide sequence was predicted to include a 23 residue signal peptide. The 43 amino acid PPRP thus extends from residue 24 to a K-R dibasic cleavage site at residue 66. The 23 amino acid mature peptide terminates in an amidation signal and has an identity of 47.8% and a similarity of 69.6% with Uca pugilator β-PDH consensus sequence. No domains were identified by SMART but a corresponding PDH domain region was identified.

RORA

One 2,217 bp partial contig, coding a 599 amino acid containing a C4 zinc finger domain was identified (Table 1; Fig. S19) as a predicted candidate for a T. saltator homologue of the hormone receptor RORA. The 3 HOLI ligand binding domain present in other RORA proteins is not identified in TalRORA. It is possible that the HOLI ligand binding domain is present in the unsequenced 3 section. The most closely aligned protein in the NCBI database is the house fly Musca domestica nuclear hormone receptor HR3 (Accession No. XP_011290218). The Drosophila hormone receptor-like in 46 protein (FlyBase No. FBpp0297438) was the closest protein to TalRORA in FlyBase.

Reverb

A 5,385 bp full length contig was identified, coding for a putative 1110 amino acid protein containing both a C4 zinc finger domain and a HOLI ligand binding domain (Table 1; Fig. S20). The sequence aligned most closely in the NCBI database to nuclear hormone receptor E75, the non-mammalian REVERB homologue in the carpenter ant Camponotus floridanus (Accession No. XP_011259848). The closest aligning protein in FlyBase was the Drosophila melanogaster E75 protein (FBpp0297726).

Sirt 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7

Five contig sequences of lengths 4,033 bp, 2,275 bp, 2,977 bp, 1,209 bp and 5,180 bp all coding for partial proteins of length 955, 376, 354, 402 and 948 amino acids, respectively were identified in the transcriptome as homologues for SIRTUIN proteins 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7. Each sequence contained one SMART identified SIR2 domain (Table 1 and Figs. S21S25). TalSIRT1 aligned most closely to the trematode Schistosoma mansoni SIRT1 (Accession No. ABG78545) in the NCBI database and Drosophila melanogaster SIRT1 (FBpp0080015) in FlyBase. TalSIRT2 was most closely aligned to the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum hypothetical protein (Accession No. EFA06770) in the NCBI database and D. melanogaster SIRT2 (FBpp0310647) in FlyBase. The putative TalSIRT4 protein is most closely aligned in the NCBI database to SIRT4 of the Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Accession No. XP_008480918) and in FlyBase to the D. melanogaster SIRT4 (FBpp0070817). The TalSIRT6 sequence most closely aligns to the water flea Daphnia pulex hypothetical protein (Accession No. EFX74386) in the NCBI database and in the FlyBase database to D. melanogaster SIRT6 (FBpp0293897). TalSIRT7 most closely aligns in the NCBI database to the SIRT7 protein of the leafcutter bee Megachile rotundata (Accession No. XP_012143211) and aligns most closely in the FlyBase database to the D. melanogaster SIRT7 protein (FBpp0084733).

Jetlag

One 2,454 bp contig coding a partial putative 458 amino acid protein was identified. This candidate putative protein sequence contains one F-box domain and multiple leucine-rich repeat domains (Table 1; Fig. S26). The sequence was most closely aligned in the NCBI database to the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum F-box/LRR-repeat protein (Accession No. XP_008193983). In the FlyBase database the TalJET sequence aligned most closely to a D. melanogaster protein from the F-box and leucine rich repeat region group (FBpp0111980).

Blast2Go analysis

Gene ontology (GO) annotations were categorised into the three groupings: ‘Biological Process,’ ‘Molecular Function’ and ‘Cellular Component’. These categories of annotation were most easily displayed graphically at ontology level 2 (Fig. 3) where the most frequent Molecular Functions were “Binding” and “Catalytic activity”; the most common Biological Processes were “Cellular and Metabolic”; and the most common Cellular Components were “Cell Components” and “Organelle components.” These GO term outputs were subsequently compared with results from transcriptomes previously generated and analysed including the larva of the moth Plutella xylostella (Xie et al., 2012), the silkworm Bombyx mori, the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta (Menon et al., 2012) and the North Atlantic copepod Calanus finmarchicus (Lenz et al., 2014). Proportions of GO terms were all found to be at broadly similar levels in all organisms transcriptomes and for each category analysed; for example, in the category Molecular Function ontology level 2 ‘binding’ terms for T. saltator, P. xylostella, B. mori and T. circumcincta were 51%, 48%, 41% and 40% respectively whilst level 2 ’catalytic activity’ terms were 31%, 36%, 38% and 40% respectively.

Figure 3. Talitrus saltator brain tissue transcriptome BLAST2GO analysis.

Figure 3

Ontology level 2 data showing functional classification of the brain transcripts from T. saltator for three main gene ontology categories.

Temporal expression of clock genes

JTK_CYCLE analysis applied to TPM values indicated oscillations (limited to a period of between 21–27h) in the core clock genes Talper (q = 1.69−07) and Talbmal1 (q = 0.001) (Fig. 4). Alternative analyses by ANOVA showed significant differences in mean values at each interval for Talcry2 (F7,30 = 2.745, P = 0.032), Talper (F7,30 = 4.86, P = 0.002) and Talbmal1 (F7,30 = 2.445, P = 0.049). Of the clock-related genes Talpdh-II (q = 5.43−04), TalckII β (q = 0.0017), Talpp1 (q = 0.023), Talshaggy (q = 0.021, Talebony (q = 0.028), Talsirt1 (q = 0.001), Talsirt7 (q = 0.037) and Taljetlag (q = 0.027) exhibited oscillatory expression profiles by JTK_CYCLE analysis. Interrogation of these data by ANOVA showed TalCK11β (F7,30 = 3.284, P = 0.014) Talpp1 (F7,30 = 3.99, P = 0.005), Talsirt1 (F7,30 = 4.91, P = 0.002) and Talslimb (F7,30 = 3.19, P = 0.016) to be differentially expressed over time. Talper mRNA accumulation increased approximately 6-fold during early night and peaked towards the middle of the subjective night (CT18-21) before diminishing at CT24 reaching a nadir at CT6. This profile is approximately antiphasic to TalckIIβ, Talpp1, Talsirt1 and Talslimb that all showed peaks in expected daytime. Talcry2 and Talbmal1 respective contigs also showed antiphasic relationships to Talper. However, JTK_CYCLE analysis did not reveal significant rhythmicity in the Talcry2 transcript.

Figure 4. Temporal expression profiles of gene transcripts in the brains of free-running Talitrus saltator.

Figure 4

Plots show TPM values of each identified core clock and clock-associated genes over a 24 h period. Data points represent mean TPM values +/− SEM (N = 4 biological replicates, except CT18 where N = 3). Significance values are shown in red for JTK_YCLE and in blue for ANOVA. Grey and black bars indicate expected daytime and nighttime, respectively.

Given the robust rhythm of Talper expression we chose this transcript with which to validate our RNAseq expression data by quantitative PCR. RNA levels of Talper in samples taken from an independent time-course experiment show peak expression (∼3-fold change from CT3) at CT19 (F7,32 = 4.54, P = 0.01, see Fig. S27). These data support those revealed by RNAseq with peak expression in the early to mid night albeit with a slightly lower amplitude.

Reads for Talcwo were below levels acceptable for analysis and excluded from further investigation.

Discussion

Talitrus saltator exhibits intriguing clock-driven behavioural phenotypes, including circadian locomotor rhythms (Bregazzi & Naylor, 1972; Ugolini et al., 2007) and time-compensated solar and lunar navigation (Ugolini et al., 1999; Ugolini, Melis & Innocenti, 1999; Ugolini, 2003; Ugolini et al., 2007). Their abundance and suitability for behavioural experimentation make them an excellent model for comparative clock analysis but to make the species more genetically tractable we set out to define the neuromolecular components of its circadian clock. Initially, our strategy included homology cloning and RACE PCR to sequence full-length Talcry2, including the 3 and 5 UTRs, but we subsequently exploited RNAseq technologies to sequence the cerebral ganglia transcriptome and identify ‘core’ clock genes and clock related genes, known in other species to play a role in normal clock functioning.

The quality of the Trinity assembled transcriptome was evaluated in a number of ways. First, we set out to maximise coverage of temporally regulated transcripts by harvesting brain tissue across a complete day-night cycle, and from behaviourally rhythmic animals. The clock gene transcripts identified from our assemblies and the proportion of assembled contigs for that encoded full-length proteins (17 out of 28) suggest we satisfied this aim. Second, standard cloning and sequencing of several genes, including Talcry2, Talper and Talbmal1 and Talpdh-I resulted in 100% nucleotide alignment with the corresponding contig coding region. Third, confidence in the identity of our contigs as clock gene transcripts was provided by the identification of conserved functional motifs in each conceptual translation. This was reflected also in the BLAST searching and high confidence levels of the search returns (expressed as e-values) from the NCBI nucleotide and protein databases as well as FlyBase. Taken together, these attributes indicate that the transcriptome is a faithful representation of all genes expressed in this tissue across a day-night cycle. Furthermore, Blast2GO analysis of the assembled contigs resulted in broadly similar numbers of GO terms and categorisation pattern to previous studies (Lenz et al., 2014; Menon et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2012). The few differences observed between GO term numbers of T. saltator to other non-model species can be attributed to transcriptomes being compared across different tissues of diverse species at different stages of development and subjected to various environmental conditions.

Clock genes are well conserved across diverse taxa (Tauber & Kyriacou, 2005; Tauber et al., 2004) and the discovery of structurally similar transcripts in T. saltator was expected. Nevertheless, our data yielded some interesting comparative insights. In T. saltator we failed to find a CRY1 but the CRY2 showed very high sequence similarity to that of the isopod Eurydice pulchra, also lacking a CRY1 but possessing a mammalian-like CRY2 that has been demonstrated in vivo to function as the principle negative repressor BMAL1:CLK transcriptional activity (Zhang et al., 2013). Given the close relationship of T. saltator to E. pulchra it is tempting to speculate that the CRY2 we describe is also a negative regulator in the core oscillator system.

Whilst Drosophila do not have a CRY2, other insects, such as the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus have both CRY1 and CRY2 (Zhu et al., 2005). This is considered to be the ancestral state- Cry2 being lost in fruit flies (Sandrelli et al., 2008). However, peracarid crustaceans, that presumably predate insects, have only a CRY2, offering alternative evolutionary perspectives on the central clock mechanism. However, the evolutionary status of cryptochrome is likely highly complex; for example, and in contrast to E. pulchra and T. saltator, the copepod crustaceans, Calanus finmarchicus and Tigriopus californicus have been shown to express a putative CRY1 transcript (Lenz et al., 2014; Nesbit & Christie, 2014) whilst some insects such as the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum and the honey bee, Apis mellifera have only a mammalian CRY2 (Rubin et al., 2006).

Using the Drosophila CYC as a search term we elucidated a CYC-like sequence in T. saltator containing a bHLH and 2 PAS domains, but differing from Drosophila in that it also contained a C-terminal transactivation domain, on the basis of which we assigned the T. saltator sequence as a vertebrate-like BMAL1. A very similar structural scenario was described for BMAL1 in E. pulchra and the water flea Daphnia pulex (Zhang et al., 2013). In E. pulchra deletion of the transactivation domain resulted in severely attenuated functionality (of the EpBMAL:EpCLK dimer) in a cell-based in vitro luciferase assay (Zhang et al., 2013). Again, whilst we have no experimental evidence to support the notion, the close structural and phylogenetic relationship between T. saltator and E. pulchra hint at a similar role for TalBMAL1.

Although our data reveal most of the clock gene candidates we had anticipated, some such as Taltim and Talclk were incomplete. However, given the presence of the conserved domains identified within the transcripts, we are confident that these partial sequences are the products of the Taltim and Talclk genes in T. saltator. Manual cloning and sequencing strategies are necessary to reveal the full-length sequences to these. We also uncovered two unusual sequences identified as Talpdh. For TalPDH-I the N-terminal end of the mature hormone contains the conserved NSE/ALINSSLLG signature but, the remaining sequence extends beyond the expected 18 residues that define PDHs, including a further 14 residues, and lacking an amidation signal. A second contig discovered with relaxed search stringency also exhibited features of PDH-like peptides with a 23 amino acid signal peptide, a 43 residue PPRP and a 23 amino acid mature PDH with C-terminal amidation. Concentrated efforts to locate other PDH candidates in our transcriptome were unsuccessful. Interestingly, a combined transcriptomic and mass spectrometry approach on the transcriptome/neuropeptidome of the krill Euphasia crystallorophias (Toullec et al., 2013) revealed three PDH isoforms PDH-Lβ1, PDH-Lβ2 and PDH-Lα. In this species PDH-Lβ1 expresses the characteristic N-terminal 12 residues but has an extended C-terminus, making the mature, amidated peptide 24 amino acids in length. The PDH-L2β is almost identical except for Ser2 being substituted for Ala2, reminiscent of the case in E. pulchra (Wilcockson et al., 2011). TalPDH-II also expresses the conserved N-terminus with a conserved substitution of Leu4 for Ile4. In accord with the structure of PDH prepropeptides, we observed the signal peptide and PPRP, separated from the mature peptide by a dibasic cleavage site (K-R). These PDH preprohormone-like features and confirmation of the contig sequences by standard and RACE PCR and cloning, together with the unusual PDH isoforms reported in euphausiids, allay our initial fears that our sequence data were mis-assemblies or anomalies. The structural and functional significance of PDHs in T. saltator are worthy of further investigation.

Many organisms show cyclic changes in gene expression of core and clock-related genes as a function of the TTFL. A feature of biological clocks is that they free-run in constant conditions i.e., the transcriptional/translational activity of the central oscillator persists with a circadian period in DD. We determined the transcriptional dynamics of the T. saltator clock genes in behaviourally rhythmic animals by mapping RNAseq sequencing reads for each time-course sample back to the assembled transcriptome and analysing temporal changes in these data by JTK_CYCLE analysis and ANOVA. Of the canonical clock genes only Talper and Talbmal were indicated as rhythmically expressed by JTK_CYCLE analysis and ANOVA with Talcry 2 abundance varying in time (ANOVA). In addition, the clock related genes, TalckIIβ, Talpp1, Talsirt1, Talsirt7 Talebony, Taljetlag, Talshaggy and Talpdh-II and showed oscillating expression using the same analytical parameters. TalCK11β, Talpp1, Talsirt1 and Talslimb abundance differences were also noted over time (ANOVA).

We chose the JTK_CYCLE algorithm because it is reported to be very robust to outliers and returns low numbers of false-positives (Hughes, Hogenesch & Kornacker, 2010). In our study we sacrificed an extended sampling period for increased biological replicates and three-hour sampling intervals. We are confident that this approach, coupled with the JTK_CYCLE data treatment yielded genuinely cycling genes that offer suitable targets for further exploration.

We caution that, it would be entirely speculative to draw conclusions on the functional significance of the rhythmicity or phase relationships of cyclic expression identified in the current study. Although circadian genes and proteins are conserved and the central tenet of the TTFL serves to describe the basis of rhythmicity across taxa, simple interspecific comparisons are confounded by the fact that clocks do show nuances in their organisation of the TTFL, e.g., in E. pulchra only Eptim shows robust cycling in animals expressing circadian and circatidal behaviour and yet Epper, which is non-rhythmically expressed, appears essential to circadian phenotypes (Zhang et al., 2013). Indeed, rhythmicity in gene expression itself is not a prerequisite for a functional clock (Lakin-Thomas, 2006). The tremendous scope for complex interplay of gene products and their cognate proteins will only be revealed by more targeted experimental approaches in non-model species. Nevertheless, our data indicate that sub-sets of clock and clock-related genes in T. saltator continue to cycle in free-running conditions and thus represent tantalising targets for investigation to uncover the role of these genes in either circadian or circalunidian (24.8 h) rhythms. For example, T. saltator has the capability to orientate by the sun and moon suggesting they may have separate daily and lunidian clocks (Ugolini et al., 1999). Indeed a precedence for independent clock mechanisms in marine organisms has been set, e.g., E. pulchra has been shown to possess a dual clock system with separate clocks orchestrating circatidal and circadian phenotypes and the marine worm Platyneries dumerilli employs separate mechanisms to keep circadian as well as lunar time (Zantke et al., 2013). The sequence data and expression analysis described here provide a foot-hold in a behaviourally tractable system from which we can address these questions.

In conclusion, we have sequenced the entire brain transcriptome of an ecologically important beach crustacean that exhibits intriguing clock-controlled phenotypes and report the sequences of key clock and clock-related genes that are likely key players in these phenotypes. Our dataset is one of only very few to describe the putative clock mechanism in a non-model crustacean and contribute to the growing inventory of crustacean and non-model transcriptomes that may have wide-ranging utility in the research community.

Supplemental Information

Figure S1. Putative Talitrus saltator CRYPTOCHROME 2 (CRY2) protein.

Alignment of Danaus plexippus CRY2 (Danpl-CRY2; Accession No. ABA62409) with the T. saltator CRY2 (Tal-CRY2) deduced from homology cloning, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Eurydice pulchra CRY2 (Ep-CRY2; Accession No. KC885970) and Bombus terrestris cryptochrome-1-like (Bomte-CRY1; Accession No. XM_012312885). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of one DNA photolyase domain and one FAD binding 7 domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-1
Figure S2. Putative Talitrus saltator PERIOD (PER) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster PER (Drome-PER; Accession No. AAF45804) with the T. saltator PER (Tal-PER) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Eurydice pulchra PER (Ep-PER; Accession No. KC885967) and Periplaneta americana (Peram-PER; Accession No. U12772). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of two PAS domains, one PAC domain and one Period C domain are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively. The region of Ep-PER that corresponds to the PAC domain is shown in green text, though no PAC domain per se was identified in this protein using SMART. Drome-PER DBT/CK1ε binding site is highlighted in pink. Dark red text indicates Drome-PER CLK/CYC inhibitory domain (CCID). Pink text indicates regions in Tal-PER, Ep-PER and Peram-PER corresponding to sequence within both the overlapping Drome-PER DBT/CK1ε binding site and CCID regions.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-2
Figure S3. Putative Talitrus saltator TIMELESS (TIM) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster TIM (Drome-TIM; Accession no. AAC46920) with the T. saltator TIM (Tal-TIM) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Lottia gigantea hypothetical protein partial (Lotgi; Accession No. XM_009048115) and Tribolium castaneum TIM (Trica-TIM; Accession No. XM_008202829). 3’ sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-TIM. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure the SMART identified Timeless domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-3
Figure S4. Putative Talitrus saltator CLOCK (CLK) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CLK (Drome-CLK; Accession No. AAC62234) with the T. saltator CLK (Tal-CLK) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Macrobrachium rosenbergii CLK (Macro-CLK; Accession No. AY842303) and Eurydice pulchra CLK (Ep-CLK; Accession No. KC885976). 3’ sequence removed from all sequences. 5’ sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-CLK to aid alignment. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one PAS domain and one PAC domain are highlighted in green and blue respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-4
Figure S5. Putative Talitrus saltator BMAL1 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CYC (Drome-CYC; Accession No. AAF49107) with the T. saltator BMAL1 (Tal-BMAL1) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Pacifastacus leniusculus BMAL1A (Pacle-BMAL1A; Accession No. JQ670886) and Eurydice pulchra BMAL1 (Ep-BMAL1; Accession No. KC885968). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of bHLH domain, PAS domains and PAC domain are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively. Red text indicates sequence with high similarity to C-terminal transactivation domain of Mus musculus BMAL1.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-5
Figure S6. Putative Talitrus saltator CASEIN KINASE II α and β (CKII-α and CKII-β) proteins.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CKII-α and CKII-β (Drome-CKII-α and Drome-CKII-β; Accession No.s AAN11415 and AAF48093 respectively) with the T. saltator CKII-α and CKII-β (Tal-CKII-α and Tal-CKII-β) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two Tal-CKII-α tblastn species homologue sequences Harpegnathos saltator CKII-α (Harsa-CKII-α; Accession No. XM_011140473) and Orussus abietinus CKII-α (Oruab-CKII-α; Accession No. XM_01242321) and the top two Tal-CKII-β tblastn species homologue sequences Atta cephalotes CKII-β (Attce-CKII-β; Accession No. XM_012208415) and Orussus abietinus CKII-β (Oruab-CKII-β; Accession No. XM_012432316). 3sequence removed from Harsa-CKII-α.’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain and casein kinase regulatory subunit domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-6
Figure S7. Putative Talitrus saltator CLOCKWORK ORANGE (CWO) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CWO (Drome-CWO; Accession no. AAF54527) with the T. saltator CWO (Tal-CWO) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Metaseiulus occidentalis uncharacterized (Metoc; Accession No. XM_003744642) and Ixodes scapularis conserved hypothetical protein (Ixosc; Accession No. XM_002400882). 5and 3sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-CWO. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of bHLH domain and Orange of the Hairy/E(SPL) family domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-7
Figure S8. Putative Talitrus saltator DOUBLTETIME (DBT) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster DCO (Drome-DCO; Accession No. AAF57110) with the T. saltator DBT (Tal-DBT) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Eurydice pulchra CKI-ε (Ep-CKI-ε ; Accession No. KC885972) and Ciona intestinalis CKI (Cioin-CKI; Accession No. XM_002125796). 5’ and 3’ sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-DBT. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-8
Figure S9. Putative Talitrus saltator Par Domain Protein 1ε (PDP1ε) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster PDP1ε (Drome-PDP1-ε; Accession No. AAF04509) with the T. saltator PDP1ε (Tal-PDP1-ε ) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Atta cephalotes TEF (Attce-TEF; Accession No. XM_012203776) and Branchiostoma floridae hypothetical protein (Brafl; Accession No. XM_002601463). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified basic region leucin zipper domain is highlighted in green.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-9
Figure S10. Putative Talitrus saltator Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster PP1 (Drome-PP1; Accession No. CAA39820) with the T. saltator PP1 (Tal-PP1) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Acromyrmex echinatior PPα2 (Acrec-PPα2; Accesion No. XM_011065955) and Vollenhovia emeryi PPα2 (Volem-PPα2; Accession No. XM_012019400). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified protein phosphatase 2Ac catalytic domains of the serine/threonine phosphatase family is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-10
Figure S11. Putative Talitrus saltator MICROTUBULE STAR (MTS) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster MTS (Drome-MTS; Accession no. AAF52567) with the T. saltator MTS (Tal-MTS) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Pediculus humanus corporis PP-V (Pedhu-PP-V; Accession No. XM_002426681) and Nasonia vitripennis PPIIA (Nasvi-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_001602456). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified protein phosphatase 2Ac catalytic domains of the serine/threonine phosphatase family are highlighted in green.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-11
Figure S12. Putative Talitrus saltator WIDERBORST (WBT) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster WBT (Drome-WBT; Accession No. AAF56720) with the T. saltator WBT (Tal-WBT) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Tribolium castaneum PPIIA (Trica-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_008197190) and Bombyx mori PPIIA (Bommo-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_004924466). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified B56 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-12
Figure S13. Putative Talitrus saltator TWINS (TWS) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster (Drome-TWS; Accession no. AAF54498) with the T. saltator TWS (Tal-TWS) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Scylla paramamosain PPIIA (Scypa-PPIIA; Accession No. JQ867383) and Megachile rotundata PPIIA (Megro-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_012288516). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure seven SMART identified WD40 domains are highlighted in green.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-13
Figure S14. Putative Talitrus saltator SHAGGY (SGG) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SGG (Drome-SGG; Accession no. AAN09084) with the T. saltator SGG (Tal-SGG) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Athalia rosae GSK-III (Athro-GSK-III; Accession No. XM_012400594) and Linepithema humile GSK-III (Linhu-GSK-III; Accession No. XM_012372547). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-14
Figure S15. Putative Talitrus saltator SUPERNUMERARY LIMBS (SLIMB) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SLIMB (Drome-SLIMB; Accession No. AAF55853) with the T. saltator SLIMB (Tal-SLIMB) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Athalia rosae βTrCP (Athro-βTrCP; Accession No. XM_012405697) and Linepithema humile βTrCP (Linhu-βTrCP; Accession No. XM_012367510). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of one D domain of beta-TrCP, one F box domain and seven WD40 domains are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-15
Figure S16. Putative Talitrus saltator VRILLE (VRI) protein.

lns:o=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” xmlns:w=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word” xmlns:m=”http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml” xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40”¿Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster VRI (Drome-VRI; Accession No. AAF52237) with the T. saltator VRI (Tal-VRI) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Clunio marinus VRI (Cluma-VRI; Accession No. JQ011276) and Acyrthosiphon pisum VRI (Acypi-VRI; Accession No. FM998650). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified basic region leucin zipper domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-16
Figure S17. Putative Talitrus saltator EBONY protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster EBONY (Drome-EBONY; Accession No. AAF55870) with the T. saltator EBONY (Tal-EBONY) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Tribolium castaneum EBONY (Trica-EBONY; Accession No. XM_008199683) and Periplaneta americana EBONY (Peram-EBONY; Accession No. AJ865468). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one AMP binding domain, one AMP binding C domain and one PP binding domain are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-17
Figure S18. Putative Talitrus saltator PIGMENT DISPERSING HORMONE (PDH) peptides.

Alignment of Eurydice pulchra PDH (Ep-PDH; Accession no. GQ380440) with the T. saltator PDH-I and PDH-II (Tal-PDH-I and Tal-PDH-II) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two Tal-PDH-I tblastn species homologue sequences Marsupenaeus japonicus PDH-II (Marja-PDH-II; Accession No. AB073368), Daphnia magna PDH (Dapma-PDH; Accession No. HQ843173) and the Euphausia crystallorophias sequences PDH-La, PDH-LbI, and PDH-LbII (Eupcr-PDH-La, Eupcr-PDH-LbI, and Eupcr-PDH-LbII respectively). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two peptides, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues. In this figure the SMART identified PDH domain is highlighted in yellow. The region of Tal-PDH-II that corresponds to the PDH regions of Drome-PDF and Tal-PDH-I is highlighted in blue, though no PDH domain per se was identified in this peptide using SMART.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-18
Figure S19. Putative Talitrus saltator RORA protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster RORA (Drome-RORA; Accession No. NP_788301) with the T. saltator RORA (Tal-RORA) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Drosophila grimshawi RORA (Drogr-RORA; Accession No. XM_001987136) and Drosophila ananassae RORA (Droan-RORA; Accession No. XM_001959222). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one C4 zinc finger domain and one HOLI ligand binding domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-19
Figure S20. Putative Talitrus saltator REVERB protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster E75 (Drome-E75; Accession No. NP_730321) with the T. saltator (Tal-REVERB) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Blattella germanica E75 (Blage-E75; Accession No. AM710419) and Apis dorsata E75 (Apido-E75; Accession No. XM_006618394). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one C4 zinc finger domain and one HOLI ligand binding domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-20
Figure S21. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT1 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIR2 (Drome-SIR2; Accession No. NP_477351) with the T. saltator (Tal-SIRT1) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Microplitis demolitor SIRT1 (Micde-SIRT1; Accession No. XM_008555996) and Fopius arisanus SIR2 (Fopar-SIR2; Accession No. XM_011303457). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-21
Figure S22. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT2 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT2 (Drome-SIRT2; Accession No. NP_650880) with the T. saltator SIRT2 (Tal-SIRT2) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Tribolium castaneum SIRT2 (Trica-SIRT2; Accession No. XM_963962) and Branchiostoma floridae hypothetical protein (Brafl-HYPO; Accession No. XM_002596789). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-22
Figure S23. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT4 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT4 (Drome-SIRT4; Accession No. NP_572241) with the T. saltator SIRT4 (Tal-SIRT4) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Branchiostoma floridae hypothetical protein (Brafl-HYPO; Accession No. XM_002605838) and Diaphorina sitri SIRT4 (Diasi-SIRT4; Accession No. XM_008482696). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-23
Figure S24. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT6 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT6 (Drome-SIRT6; Accession No. NP_649990) with the T. saltator SIRT6 (Tal-SIRT6) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Papilio polytes SIRT6 (Pappo-SIRT6; Accession No. XM_013284914) and Papilio xuthus SIRT6 (Papxu-SIRT6; Accession No. XM_013314262). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-24
Figure S25. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT7 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT7 (Drome-SIRT7; Accession No. NP_651664) with the T. saltator SIRT7 (Tal-SIRT7) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Megachile rotundata SIRT7 (Megro-SIRT7; Accession No. XM_012287821) and Apis dorsata SIRT7 (Apido-SIRT7; Accession No.). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-25
Figure S26. Putative Talitrus saltator JETLAG protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster JETLAG (Drome-JET; Accession No. NP_608880) with the T. saltator JETLAG (Tal-JET) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Orussus abietinus F-box/LRR repeat protein 20 (Oruab-FBOX/LRR; Accession No. XM_012430170) and Harpegnathos saltator F-box/LRR repeat protein 20 Harsa-FBOX/LRR; Accession No. XM_011152298). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one F-box domain and multiple leucine-rich repeat domains are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-26
Figure S27. Expression profiling of Talper mRNA by Taqman PCR.

Timecourse samples taken from behaviourally rhythmic animals held in DD yield rhythmic changes in Talper abundance with peak mRNA levels in early night. Talper expression is normalised to Talak and shown as mean expression +/- SEM (N = 4). Black and grey bars illustrate time of expected day and night, respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-27
Table S1. Primer, probes and adapter sequences used for Talitrus saltator degenerate Taqman and RACE PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-28
Table S2. tblastn analyses of all Talitrus saltator circadian proteins vs. all NCBI curated non-redundant sequences.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-29
Table S3. blastp analyses of all Talitrus saltator circadian proteins vs. all NCBI curated non-redundant protein sequences.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-30
Table S4. blastp analyses of all Talitrus saltator circadian proteins vs. all FlyBase annotated protein sequences.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-31
File S1. Supplementary Methods (degenerate and RACE PCR and qPCR).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-32

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Justin Pachebat, (Aberystwyth University) for his advice and help with initial transcriptome sequencing strategies.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council, UK grant NE/K000594/1 awarded to D.C.W. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Joseph F. O’Grady conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Laura S. Hoelters performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Martin T. Swain analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David C. Wilcockson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

NCBI SRA and GenBank. Assembly project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession GDUJ00000000.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Figshare: https://figshare.com/s/a2513243c63bf557b720.

References

  • Adams et al. (2000).Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides PG, Scherer SE, Li PW, Hoskins RA, Galle RF, George RA, Lewis SE, Richards S, Ashburner M, Henderson SN, Sutton GG, Wortman JR, Yandell MD, Zhang Q, Chen LX, Brandon RC, Rogers YH, Blazej RG, Champe M, Pfeiffer BD, Wan KH, Doyle C, Baxter EG, Helt G, Nelson CR, Gabor GL, Abril JF, Agbayani A, An HJ, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Baldwin D, Ballew RM, Basu A, Baxendale J, Bayraktaroglu L, Beasley EM, Beeson KY, Benos PV, Berman BP, Bhandari D, Bolshakov S, Borkova D, Botchan MR, Bouck J, Brokstein P, Brottier P, Burtis KC, Busam DA, Butler H, Cadieu E, Center A, Chandra I, Cherry JM, Cawley S, Dahlke C, Davenport LB, Davies P, De Pablos B, Delcher A, Deng Z, Mays AD, Dew I, Dietz SM, Dodson K, Doup LE, Downes M, Dugan-Rocha S, Dunkov BC, Dunn P, Durbin KJ, Evangelista CC, Ferraz C, Ferriera S, Fleischmann W, Fosler C, Gabrielian AE, Garg NS, Gelbart WM, Glasser K, Glodek A, Gong F, Gorrell JH, Gu Z, Guan P, Harris M, Harris NL, Harvey D, Heiman TJ, Hernandez JR, Houck J, Hostin D, Houston KA, Howland TJ, Wei MH, Ibegwam C, Jalali M, Kalush F, Karpen GH, Ke Z, Kennison JA, Ketchum KA, Kimmel BE, Kodira CD, Kraft C, Kravitz S, Kulp D, Lai Z, Lasko P, Lei Y, Levitsky AA, Li J, Li Z, Liang Y, Lin X, Liu X, Mattei B, Mcintosh TC, Mcleod MP, Mcpherson D, Merkulov G, Milshina NV, Mobarry C, Morris J, Moshrefi A, Mount SM, Moy M, Murphy B, Murphy L, Muzny DM, Nelson DL, Nelson DR, Nelson KA, Nixon K, Nusskern DR, Pacleb JM, Palazzolo M, Pittman GS, Pan S, Pollard J, Puri V, Reese MG, Reinert K, Remington K, Saunders RD, Scheeler F, Shen H, Shue BC, Siden-Kiamos I, Simpson M, Skupski MP, Smith T, Spier E, Spradling AC, Stapleton M, Strong R, Sun E, Svirskas R, Tector C, Turner R, Venter E, Wang AH, Wang X, Wang ZY, Wassarman DA, Weinstock GM, Weissenbach J, Williams SM, Woodage T, Worley KC, Wu D, Yang S, Yao QA, Ye J, Yeh RF, Zaveri JS, Zhan M, Zhang G, Zhao Q, Zheng L, Zheng XH, Zhong FN, Zhong W, Zhou X, Zhu S, Zhu X, Smith HO, Gibbs RA, Myers EW, Rubin GM, Venter JC. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000;287:2185–2195. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Allada & Chung (2010).Allada R, Chung BY. Circadian organization of behavior and physiology in Drosophila. Annual Review of Physiology. 2010;72:605–624. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bae et al. (1998).Bae K, Lee C, Sidote D, Chuang KY, Edery I. Circadian regulation of a Drosophila homolog of the mammalian Clock gene: PER and TIM function as positive regulators. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1998;18:6142–6151. doi: 10.1128/MCB.18.10.6142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bajgar, Jindra & Dolezel (2013).Bajgar A, Jindra M, Dolezel D. Autonomous regulation of the insect gut by circadian genes acting downstream of juvenile hormone signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:4416–4421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217060110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beckwith et al. (2011).Beckwith EJ, Lelito KR, Hsu YW, Medina BM, Shafer O, Ceriani MF, De la Iglesia HO. Functional conservation of clock output signaling between flies and intertidal crabs. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 2011;26:518–529. doi: 10.1177/0748730411420242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blau & Young (1999).Blau J, Young MW. Cycling vrille expression is required for a functional Drosophila clock. Cell. 1999;99:661–671. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81554-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blenau & Baumann (2005).Blenau W, Baumann A. Molecular characterization of the ebony gene from the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2005;59:184–195. doi: 10.1002/arch.20064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonasio et al. (2010).Bonasio R, Zhang G, Ye C, Mutti NS, Fang X, Qin N, Donahue G, Yang P, Li Q, Li C, Zhang P, Huang Z, Berger SL, Reinberg D, Wang J, Liebig J. Genomic comparison of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator. Science. 2010;329:1068–1071. doi: 10.1126/science.1192428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bregazzi & Naylor (1972).Bregazzi PK, Naylor E. Locomotor activity rhythm of Talitrus saltator (Montagu) (Crustacean, Amphipoda) Journal of Experimental Biology. 1972;57:375–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Christie et al. (2013).Christie AE, Fontanilla TM, Nesbit KT, Lenz PH. Prediction of the protein components of a putative Calanus finmarchicus (Crustacea, Copepoda) circadian signaling system using a de novo assembled transcriptome. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics. 2013;8:165–193. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Conesa et al. (2005).Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–3676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cyran et al. (2003).Cyran SA, Buchsbaum AM, Reddy KL, Lin MC, Glossop NR, Hardin PE, Young MW, Storti RV, Blau J. vrille, Pdp1, and dClock form a second feedback loop in the Drosophila circadian clock. Cell. 2003;112:329–341. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00074-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • De Pitta et al. (2013).De Pitta C, Biscontin A, Albiero A, Sales G, Millino C, Mazzotta GM, Bertolucci C, Costa R. The Antarctic Krill Euphausia superba shows diurnal cycles of transcription under natural conditions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068652. Article e68652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards & Naylor (1987).Edwards JM, Naylor E. Endogenous circadian changes in orientational behavior of Talitrus saltator. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 1987;67:17–26. doi: 10.1017/S0025315400026333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Glossop et al. (2003).Glossop NR, Houl JH, Zheng H, Ng FS, Dudek SM, Hardin PE. VRILLE feeds back to control circadian transcription of Clock in the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Neuron. 2003;37:249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gotz et al. (2008).Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, Robles M, Talon M, Dopazo J, Conesa A. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008;36:3420–3435. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grabherr et al. (2011).Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, Chen Z, Mauceli E, Hacohen N, Gnirke A, Rhind N, Di Palma F, Birren BW, Nusbaum C, Lindblad-Toh K, Friedman N, Regev A. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology. 2011;29:644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall (1999).Hall TA. BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequenc alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symposium; 1999. pp. p 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • Hardin (2009).Hardin PE. Molecular mechanisms of circadian timekeeping in Drosophila. Sleep and Biological Rhythms. 2009;7:235–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8425.2009.00412.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes, Hogenesch & Kornacker (2010).Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB, Kornacker K. JTK–CYCLE: an efficient nonparametric algorithm for detecting rhythmic components in genome-scale data sets. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 2010;25:372–380. doi: 10.1177/0748730410379711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kadener et al. (2007).Kadener S, Stoleru D, McDonald M, Nawathean P, Rosbash M. Clockwork Orange is a transcriptional repressor and a new Drosophila circadian pacemaker component. Genes and Development. 2007;21:1675–1686. doi: 10.1101/gad.1552607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lakin-Thomas (2006).Lakin-Thomas PL. Transcriptional feedback oscillators: maybe, maybe not. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 2006;21:83–92. doi: 10.1177/0748730405286102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lenz et al. (2014).Lenz PH, Roncalli V, Hassett RP, Wu LS, Cieslak MC, Hartline DK, Christie AE. De Novo Assembly of a transcriptome for Calanus finmarchicus (Crustacea, Copepoda) - the dominant zooplankter of the North Atlantic Ocean. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:ARTNe88589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Letunic, Doerks & Bork (2009).Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37:D229–D232. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li & Dewey (2011).Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li & Godzik (2006).Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658–1659. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li, Jaroszewski & Godzik (2001).Li W, Jaroszewski L, Godzik A. Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:282–283. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.3.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lim et al. (2007).Lim C, Chung BY, Pitman JL, McGill JJ, Pradhan S, Lee J, Keegan KP, Choe J, Allada R. Clockwork orange encodes a transcriptional repressor important for circadian-clock amplitude in Drosophila. Current Biology. 2007;17:1082–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsumoto et al. (2007).Matsumoto A, Ukai-Tadenuma M, Yamada RG, Houl J, Uno KD, Kasukawa T, Dauwalder B, Itoh TQ, Takahashi K, Ueda R, Hardin PE, Tanimura T, Ueda HR. A functional genomics strategy reveals clockwork orange as a transcriptional regulator in the Drosophila circadian clock. Genes and Development. 2007;21:1687–1700. doi: 10.1101/gad.1552207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Menon et al. (2012).Menon R, Gasser RB, Mitreva M, Ranganathan S. An analysis of the transcriptome of Teladorsagia circumcincta: its biological and biotechnological implications. BMC Genomics. 2012;13 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-S7-S10. Article S10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miyazaki et al. (2011).Miyazaki M, Schroder E, Edelmann SE, Hughes ME, Kornacker K, Balke CW, Esser KA. Age-associated disruption of molecular clock expression in skeletal muscle of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers et al. (1995).Myers MP, Wagersmith K, Wesley CS, Young MW, Sehgal A. Positional cloning and sequence analysis of the Drosophila Clock gene, Timeless. Science. 1995;270:805–808. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nesbit & Christie (2014).Nesbit KT, Christie AE. Identification of the molecular components of a Tigriopus californicus (Crustacea, Copepoda) circadian clock. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics. 2014;12:16–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2014.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Niefind et al. (1998).Niefind K, Guerra B, Pinna LA, Issinger OG, Schomburg D. Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of protein kinase CK2 from Zea mays at 2.1 A resolution. EMBO Journal. 1998;17:2451–2462. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.9.2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oxley et al. (2014).Oxley PR, Ji L, Fetter-Pruneda I, Mckenzie SK, Li C, Hu HF, Zhang GJ, Kronauer DJC. The genome of the clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi. Current Biology. 2014;24:451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pardi & Papi (1952).Pardi L, Papi F. Die Sonne Als kompass bei Talitrus saltator (Montagu), (Amphipoda, Talitridae) Naturwissenschaften. 1952;39:262–263. [Google Scholar]
  • Petersen et al. (2011).Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nature Methods. 2011;8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reppert (2006).Reppert SM. A colorful model of the circadian clock. Cell. 2006;124:233–236. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rubin et al. (2006).Rubin EB, Shemesh Y, Cohen M, Elgavish S, Robertson HM, Bloch G. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses reveal mammalian-like clockwork in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) and shed new light on the molecular evolution of the circadian clock. Genome Research. 2006;16:1352–1365. doi: 10.1101/gr.5094806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sandrelli et al. (2008).Sandrelli F, Costa R, Kyriacou CP, Rosato E. Comparative analysis of circadian clock genes in insects. Insect Molecular Biology. 2008;17:447–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2008.00832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sauman et al. (2005).Sauman I, Briscoe AD, Zhu H, Shi D, Froy O, Stalleicken J, Yuan Q, Casselman A, Reppert SM. Connecting the navigational clock to sun compass input in monarch butterfly brain. Neuron. 2005;46:457–467. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shafer & Yao (2014).Shafer OT, Yao Z. Pigment-dispersing factor signaling and circadian rhythms in insect locomotor activity. Current Opinion in Insect Science. 2014;1:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strauss & Dircksen (2010).Strauss J, Dircksen H. Circadian clocks in crustaceans: identified neuronal and cellular systems. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2010;15:1040–1074. doi: 10.2741/3661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tauber & Kyriacou (2005).Tauber E, Kyriacou CP. Molecular evolution and population genetics of circadian clock genes. Methods in Enzymology. 2005;393:797–817. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)93042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tauber et al. (2004).Tauber E, Last KS, Olive PJ, Kyriacou CP. Clock gene evolution and functional divergence. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 2004;19:445–458. doi: 10.1177/0748730404268775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Terrapon et al. (2014).Terrapon N, Li C, Robertson HM, Ji L, Meng XH, Booth W, Chen ZS, Childers CP, Glastad KM, Gokhale K, Gowin J, Gronenberg W, Hermansen RA, Hu HF, Hunt BG, Huylmans AK, Khalil SMS, Mitchell RD, Munoz-Torres MC, Mustard JA, Pan HL, Reese JT, Scharf ME, Sun FM, Vogel H, Xiao J, Yang W, Yang ZK, Yang ZQ, Zhou JJ, Zhu JW, Brent CS, Elsik CG, Goodisman MAD, Liberles DA, Roe RM, Vargo EL, Vilcinskas A, Wang J, Bornberg-Bauer E, Korb J, Zhang GJ, Liebig J. Molecular traces of alternative social organization in a termite genome. Nature Communications. 2014;5 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4636. Article 3636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Toullec et al. (2013).Toullec JY, Corre E, Bernay B, Thorne MA, Cascella K, Ollivaux C, Henry J, Clark MS. Transcriptome and peptidome characterisation of the main neuropeptides and peptidic hormones of a euphausiid: the Ice Krill, Euphausia crystallorophias. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ugolini (2003).Ugolini A. Activity rhythms and orientation in sandhoppers (Crustacea, Amphipoda) Frontiers in Bioscience. 2003;8:s722–s732. doi: 10.2741/1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ugolini, Melis & Innocenti (1999).Ugolini A, Melis C, Innocenti R. Moon orientation in adult and young sandhoppers. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology. 1999;184:9–12. doi: 10.1007/s003590050301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ugolini et al. (1999).Ugolini A, Melis C, Innocenti R, Tiribilli B, Castellini C. Moon and sun compasses in sandhoppers rely on two separate chronometric mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1999;266:749–752. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ugolini et al. (2007).Ugolini A, Somigli S, Pasquali V, Renzi P. Locomotor activity rhythm and sun compass orientation in the sandhopper Talitrus saltator are related. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology. 2007;193:1259–1263. doi: 10.1007/s00359-007-0277-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ugolini, Tiribilli & Boddi (2002).Ugolini A, Tiribilli B, Boddi V. The sun compass of the sandhopper Talitrus saltator: the speed of the chronometric mechanism depends on the hours of light. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2002;205:3225–3230. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.20.3225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner, Kin & Lynch (2012).Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory in Biosciences. 2012;131:281–285. doi: 10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilcockson et al. (2011).Wilcockson DC, Zhang L, Hastings MH, Kyriacou CP, Webster SG. A novel form of pigment-dispersing hormone in the central nervous system of the intertidal marine isopod, Eurydice pulchra (leach) Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2011;519:562–575. doi: 10.1002/cne.22533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xie et al. (2012).Xie W, Lei YY, Fu W, Yang ZX, Zhu X, Guo ZJ, Wu QJ, Wang SL, Xu BY, Zhou XG, Zhang YJ. Tissue specific transcriptome profiling of Plutella Xylostella third instar larval midgut. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;8:1142–1155. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.4588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2006).Yang JS, Dai ZM, Yang F, Yang WJ. Molecular cloning of Clock cDNA from the prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Brain Research. 2006;1067:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zantke et al. (2013).Zantke J, Ishikawa-Fujiwara T, Arboleda E, Lohs C, Schipany K, Hallay N, Straw AD, Todo T, Tessmar-Raible K. Circadian and circalunar clock interactions in a marine annelid. Cell Reports. 2013;5:99–113. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2013).Zhang L, Hastings MH, Green EW, Tauber E, Sladek M, Webster SG, Kyriacou CP, Wilcockson DC. Dissociation of circadian and circatidal timekeeping in the marine crustacean Eurydice pulchra. Current Biology. 2013;23:1863–1873. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu et al. (2005).Zhu H, Yuan Q, Briscoe AD, Froy O, Casselman A, Reppert SM. The two CRYs of the butterfly. Current Biology. 2005;15:R953–R954. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Putative Talitrus saltator CRYPTOCHROME 2 (CRY2) protein.

Alignment of Danaus plexippus CRY2 (Danpl-CRY2; Accession No. ABA62409) with the T. saltator CRY2 (Tal-CRY2) deduced from homology cloning, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Eurydice pulchra CRY2 (Ep-CRY2; Accession No. KC885970) and Bombus terrestris cryptochrome-1-like (Bomte-CRY1; Accession No. XM_012312885). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of one DNA photolyase domain and one FAD binding 7 domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-1
Figure S2. Putative Talitrus saltator PERIOD (PER) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster PER (Drome-PER; Accession No. AAF45804) with the T. saltator PER (Tal-PER) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Eurydice pulchra PER (Ep-PER; Accession No. KC885967) and Periplaneta americana (Peram-PER; Accession No. U12772). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of two PAS domains, one PAC domain and one Period C domain are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively. The region of Ep-PER that corresponds to the PAC domain is shown in green text, though no PAC domain per se was identified in this protein using SMART. Drome-PER DBT/CK1ε binding site is highlighted in pink. Dark red text indicates Drome-PER CLK/CYC inhibitory domain (CCID). Pink text indicates regions in Tal-PER, Ep-PER and Peram-PER corresponding to sequence within both the overlapping Drome-PER DBT/CK1ε binding site and CCID regions.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-2
Figure S3. Putative Talitrus saltator TIMELESS (TIM) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster TIM (Drome-TIM; Accession no. AAC46920) with the T. saltator TIM (Tal-TIM) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Lottia gigantea hypothetical protein partial (Lotgi; Accession No. XM_009048115) and Tribolium castaneum TIM (Trica-TIM; Accession No. XM_008202829). 3’ sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-TIM. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure the SMART identified Timeless domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-3
Figure S4. Putative Talitrus saltator CLOCK (CLK) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CLK (Drome-CLK; Accession No. AAC62234) with the T. saltator CLK (Tal-CLK) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Macrobrachium rosenbergii CLK (Macro-CLK; Accession No. AY842303) and Eurydice pulchra CLK (Ep-CLK; Accession No. KC885976). 3’ sequence removed from all sequences. 5’ sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-CLK to aid alignment. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one PAS domain and one PAC domain are highlighted in green and blue respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-4
Figure S5. Putative Talitrus saltator BMAL1 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CYC (Drome-CYC; Accession No. AAF49107) with the T. saltator BMAL1 (Tal-BMAL1) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Pacifastacus leniusculus BMAL1A (Pacle-BMAL1A; Accession No. JQ670886) and Eurydice pulchra BMAL1 (Ep-BMAL1; Accession No. KC885968). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of bHLH domain, PAS domains and PAC domain are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively. Red text indicates sequence with high similarity to C-terminal transactivation domain of Mus musculus BMAL1.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-5
Figure S6. Putative Talitrus saltator CASEIN KINASE II α and β (CKII-α and CKII-β) proteins.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CKII-α and CKII-β (Drome-CKII-α and Drome-CKII-β; Accession No.s AAN11415 and AAF48093 respectively) with the T. saltator CKII-α and CKII-β (Tal-CKII-α and Tal-CKII-β) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two Tal-CKII-α tblastn species homologue sequences Harpegnathos saltator CKII-α (Harsa-CKII-α; Accession No. XM_011140473) and Orussus abietinus CKII-α (Oruab-CKII-α; Accession No. XM_01242321) and the top two Tal-CKII-β tblastn species homologue sequences Atta cephalotes CKII-β (Attce-CKII-β; Accession No. XM_012208415) and Orussus abietinus CKII-β (Oruab-CKII-β; Accession No. XM_012432316). 3sequence removed from Harsa-CKII-α.’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain and casein kinase regulatory subunit domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-6
Figure S7. Putative Talitrus saltator CLOCKWORK ORANGE (CWO) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster CWO (Drome-CWO; Accession no. AAF54527) with the T. saltator CWO (Tal-CWO) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Metaseiulus occidentalis uncharacterized (Metoc; Accession No. XM_003744642) and Ixodes scapularis conserved hypothetical protein (Ixosc; Accession No. XM_002400882). 5and 3sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-CWO. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of bHLH domain and Orange of the Hairy/E(SPL) family domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-7
Figure S8. Putative Talitrus saltator DOUBLTETIME (DBT) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster DCO (Drome-DCO; Accession No. AAF57110) with the T. saltator DBT (Tal-DBT) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Eurydice pulchra CKI-ε (Ep-CKI-ε ; Accession No. KC885972) and Ciona intestinalis CKI (Cioin-CKI; Accession No. XM_002125796). 5’ and 3’ sequence removed from all sequences except Tal-DBT. ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-8
Figure S9. Putative Talitrus saltator Par Domain Protein 1ε (PDP1ε) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster PDP1ε (Drome-PDP1-ε; Accession No. AAF04509) with the T. saltator PDP1ε (Tal-PDP1-ε ) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Atta cephalotes TEF (Attce-TEF; Accession No. XM_012203776) and Branchiostoma floridae hypothetical protein (Brafl; Accession No. XM_002601463). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified basic region leucin zipper domain is highlighted in green.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-9
Figure S10. Putative Talitrus saltator Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster PP1 (Drome-PP1; Accession No. CAA39820) with the T. saltator PP1 (Tal-PP1) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Acromyrmex echinatior PPα2 (Acrec-PPα2; Accesion No. XM_011065955) and Vollenhovia emeryi PPα2 (Volem-PPα2; Accession No. XM_012019400). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified protein phosphatase 2Ac catalytic domains of the serine/threonine phosphatase family is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-10
Figure S11. Putative Talitrus saltator MICROTUBULE STAR (MTS) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster MTS (Drome-MTS; Accession no. AAF52567) with the T. saltator MTS (Tal-MTS) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Pediculus humanus corporis PP-V (Pedhu-PP-V; Accession No. XM_002426681) and Nasonia vitripennis PPIIA (Nasvi-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_001602456). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified protein phosphatase 2Ac catalytic domains of the serine/threonine phosphatase family are highlighted in green.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-11
Figure S12. Putative Talitrus saltator WIDERBORST (WBT) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster WBT (Drome-WBT; Accession No. AAF56720) with the T. saltator WBT (Tal-WBT) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Tribolium castaneum PPIIA (Trica-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_008197190) and Bombyx mori PPIIA (Bommo-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_004924466). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified B56 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-12
Figure S13. Putative Talitrus saltator TWINS (TWS) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster (Drome-TWS; Accession no. AAF54498) with the T. saltator TWS (Tal-TWS) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Scylla paramamosain PPIIA (Scypa-PPIIA; Accession No. JQ867383) and Megachile rotundata PPIIA (Megro-PPIIA; Accession No. XM_012288516). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure seven SMART identified WD40 domains are highlighted in green.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-13
Figure S14. Putative Talitrus saltator SHAGGY (SGG) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SGG (Drome-SGG; Accession no. AAN09084) with the T. saltator SGG (Tal-SGG) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Athalia rosae GSK-III (Athro-GSK-III; Accession No. XM_012400594) and Linepithema humile GSK-III (Linhu-GSK-III; Accession No. XM_012372547). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified serine/threonine protein kinase catalytic domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-14
Figure S15. Putative Talitrus saltator SUPERNUMERARY LIMBS (SLIMB) protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SLIMB (Drome-SLIMB; Accession No. AAF55853) with the T. saltator SLIMB (Tal-SLIMB) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Athalia rosae βTrCP (Athro-βTrCP; Accession No. XM_012405697) and Linepithema humile βTrCP (Linhu-βTrCP; Accession No. XM_012367510). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains of one D domain of beta-TrCP, one F box domain and seven WD40 domains are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-15
Figure S16. Putative Talitrus saltator VRILLE (VRI) protein.

lns:o=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” xmlns:w=”urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word” xmlns:m=”http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml” xmlns=”http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40”¿Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster VRI (Drome-VRI; Accession No. AAF52237) with the T. saltator VRI (Tal-VRI) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Clunio marinus VRI (Cluma-VRI; Accession No. JQ011276) and Acyrthosiphon pisum VRI (Acypi-VRI; Accession No. FM998650). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure a SMART identified basic region leucin zipper domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-16
Figure S17. Putative Talitrus saltator EBONY protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster EBONY (Drome-EBONY; Accession No. AAF55870) with the T. saltator EBONY (Tal-EBONY) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Tribolium castaneum EBONY (Trica-EBONY; Accession No. XM_008199683) and Periplaneta americana EBONY (Peram-EBONY; Accession No. AJ865468). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one AMP binding domain, one AMP binding C domain and one PP binding domain are highlighted in yellow, green and blue respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-17
Figure S18. Putative Talitrus saltator PIGMENT DISPERSING HORMONE (PDH) peptides.

Alignment of Eurydice pulchra PDH (Ep-PDH; Accession no. GQ380440) with the T. saltator PDH-I and PDH-II (Tal-PDH-I and Tal-PDH-II) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two Tal-PDH-I tblastn species homologue sequences Marsupenaeus japonicus PDH-II (Marja-PDH-II; Accession No. AB073368), Daphnia magna PDH (Dapma-PDH; Accession No. HQ843173) and the Euphausia crystallorophias sequences PDH-La, PDH-LbI, and PDH-LbII (Eupcr-PDH-La, Eupcr-PDH-LbI, and Eupcr-PDH-LbII respectively). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two peptides, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues. In this figure the SMART identified PDH domain is highlighted in yellow. The region of Tal-PDH-II that corresponds to the PDH regions of Drome-PDF and Tal-PDH-I is highlighted in blue, though no PDH domain per se was identified in this peptide using SMART.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-18
Figure S19. Putative Talitrus saltator RORA protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster RORA (Drome-RORA; Accession No. NP_788301) with the T. saltator RORA (Tal-RORA) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Drosophila grimshawi RORA (Drogr-RORA; Accession No. XM_001987136) and Drosophila ananassae RORA (Droan-RORA; Accession No. XM_001959222). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one C4 zinc finger domain and one HOLI ligand binding domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-19
Figure S20. Putative Talitrus saltator REVERB protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster E75 (Drome-E75; Accession No. NP_730321) with the T. saltator (Tal-REVERB) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Blattella germanica E75 (Blage-E75; Accession No. AM710419) and Apis dorsata E75 (Apido-E75; Accession No. XM_006618394). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one C4 zinc finger domain and one HOLI ligand binding domain are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-20
Figure S21. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT1 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIR2 (Drome-SIR2; Accession No. NP_477351) with the T. saltator (Tal-SIRT1) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Microplitis demolitor SIRT1 (Micde-SIRT1; Accession No. XM_008555996) and Fopius arisanus SIR2 (Fopar-SIR2; Accession No. XM_011303457). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-21
Figure S22. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT2 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT2 (Drome-SIRT2; Accession No. NP_650880) with the T. saltator SIRT2 (Tal-SIRT2) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Tribolium castaneum SIRT2 (Trica-SIRT2; Accession No. XM_963962) and Branchiostoma floridae hypothetical protein (Brafl-HYPO; Accession No. XM_002596789). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-22
Figure S23. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT4 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT4 (Drome-SIRT4; Accession No. NP_572241) with the T. saltator SIRT4 (Tal-SIRT4) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Branchiostoma floridae hypothetical protein (Brafl-HYPO; Accession No. XM_002605838) and Diaphorina sitri SIRT4 (Diasi-SIRT4; Accession No. XM_008482696). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-23
Figure S24. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT6 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT6 (Drome-SIRT6; Accession No. NP_649990) with the T. saltator SIRT6 (Tal-SIRT6) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Papilio polytes SIRT6 (Pappo-SIRT6; Accession No. XM_013284914) and Papilio xuthus SIRT6 (Papxu-SIRT6; Accession No. XM_013314262). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-24
Figure S25. Putative Talitrus saltator SIRT7 protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster SIRT7 (Drome-SIRT7; Accession No. NP_651664) with the T. saltator SIRT7 (Tal-SIRT7) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Megachile rotundata SIRT7 (Megro-SIRT7; Accession No. XM_012287821) and Apis dorsata SIRT7 (Apido-SIRT7; Accession No.). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure one SMART identified SIR2 domain is highlighted in yellow.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-25
Figure S26. Putative Talitrus saltator JETLAG protein.

Alignment of Drosophila melanogaster JETLAG (Drome-JET; Accession No. NP_608880) with the T. saltator JETLAG (Tal-JET) deduced from the Trinity de novo transcriptome assembly, together with the top two tblastn species homologue sequences Orussus abietinus F-box/LRR repeat protein 20 (Oruab-FBOX/LRR; Accession No. XM_012430170) and Harpegnathos saltator F-box/LRR repeat protein 20 Harsa-FBOX/LRR; Accession No. XM_011152298). ’*’ indicates identical amino acid residues in the two proteins, ’.’ and ’:’ indicate similar amino acid residues between the two proteins. In this figure SMART identified domains consisting of one F-box domain and multiple leucine-rich repeat domains are highlighted in yellow and green respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-26
Figure S27. Expression profiling of Talper mRNA by Taqman PCR.

Timecourse samples taken from behaviourally rhythmic animals held in DD yield rhythmic changes in Talper abundance with peak mRNA levels in early night. Talper expression is normalised to Talak and shown as mean expression +/- SEM (N = 4). Black and grey bars illustrate time of expected day and night, respectively.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-27
Table S1. Primer, probes and adapter sequences used for Talitrus saltator degenerate Taqman and RACE PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-28
Table S2. tblastn analyses of all Talitrus saltator circadian proteins vs. all NCBI curated non-redundant sequences.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-29
Table S3. blastp analyses of all Talitrus saltator circadian proteins vs. all NCBI curated non-redundant protein sequences.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-30
Table S4. blastp analyses of all Talitrus saltator circadian proteins vs. all FlyBase annotated protein sequences.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-31
File S1. Supplementary Methods (degenerate and RACE PCR and qPCR).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2555/supp-32

Data Availability Statement

Raw data files have been deposited in public sequencing databases as indicated in the text or at https://figshare.com/s/a2513243c63bf557b720.

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Figshare: https://figshare.com/s/a2513243c63bf557b720.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES