Exploring Antibacterial Activity of Fish Protein Hydrolysate In Vitro Against Vibrio Strains and Disease Resistance to V. harveyi in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Yuliang Wei; Lu Wang; Yanlu Li; Qiang Ma; Mengqing Liang; Houguo Xu

doi:10.1155/anu/3446155

. 2025 Jan 28;2025:3446155. doi: 10.1155/anu/3446155

Exploring Antibacterial Activity of Fish Protein Hydrolysate In Vitro Against Vibrio Strains and Disease Resistance to V. harveyi in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Yuliang Wei ^1,², Lu Wang ¹, Yanlu Li ¹, Qiang Ma ¹, Mengqing Liang ^1,², Houguo Xu ^1,^2,^✉

PMCID: PMC11824708 PMID: 39949355

Abstract

This study was to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) against Vibrio harveyi, V. anguillarum, and V. scophthalmi, as well as the nonspecific immunity, intestinal microbiota, and disease resistance to V. harveyi in turbot. FPH was prepared from Pollock. The antibacterial activity of FPH was measured by the agar well diffusion, turbidometric assay, and plate count. The feeding trial was performed to study the effect of FPH on the resistance against V. harveyi in turbot after feeding three diets containing a high level of fish meal (FM), a high level of soybean meal (SM), and 100 g/kg FPH. Agar well diffusion showed the clearest inhibition zone of FPH was observed against V. harveyi, followed by V. scophthalmi. The bacterial growth curve and plate count showed a slight antibacterial effect of FPH against V. anguillarum. Results of the feeding trial showed that FPH enhanced antioxidant and immune responses before V. harveyi challenge as modulating immunoglobulin M (IgM), catalase (CAT), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities in serum, as well as the number of goblet cells in the intestine. Meanwhile, the expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1β [il-1β], il-6, and il-8) was downregulated in the FPH group after the V. harveyi challenge. Survival probability in the FPH group increased after challenging to V. harveyi based on the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results of intestinal microbiota showed the relative abundance of Vibrio in the SM group was the highest, followed by the FPH and control groups. Similarly, the relative abundance of distal intestinal V. harveyi was significantly reduced in the FPH group by analyzing the vhhp2 gene. In conclusion, the present FPH against Vibrio strains was species-specific, with stronger antibacterial activity to V. harveyi. Dietary FPH enhanced the nonspecific immunity and antibacterial activity of turbot, increasing the resistance to V. harveyi.

Keywords: antibacterial activity, fish protein hydrolysate, immune response, intestinal microbiota, Vibrio

1. Introduction

The fish processing industry generates a large amount of fish byproducts while meeting human demand for aquatic animal food [1]. According to the production of wild and farmed fish, the global fish byproducts are estimated to reach 22.2 million tons per year [2], which will result in the disposal problems and environmental pollution. Since fish byproducts can be considered a valuable source of fish protein, its treatment in an environmentally friendly and sustainable manner has driven research into fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) [3]. Using exogenous enzymatic hydrolysis to produce FPH was an effective method to recycle and efficiently utilize fish byproducts. FPH is a product containing free amino acids and peptides by enzymatically hydrolyzing native protein from fish byproducts [4]. In terms of the nutritional property of FPH, it not only enhances fish growth as the protein source substitute to fish meal (FM) but also improves utilization of some low-quality ingredient sources, such as poultry byproduct meal [5], soy meal concentrate [6], and lupin meal/fermented lupin meal [7], by compensating for their nutritional shortcomings [8].

In addition, antibacterial peptides are found to be produced during the hydrolysis process of FPH. For instance, Aissaoui et al. [9] reported that an antibacterial peptide with the sequence FPIGMGHGSRPA was purified from Scorpaena notata viscera protein hydrolysate using a neutral protease; Offret et al. [10] discovered a glyceraldehyde−3-phosphate dehydrogenase-related antibacterial peptide (KVEIVAINDPFIDL) from Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) hydrolysate that exhibited antibacterial activity against Listeria strains. In the food nutrition aspect, numerous studies focused on the antibacterial activity of FPH against many food-spoiling bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and used its antibacterial properties as the natural ingredient for food production industry [11, 12]. In the aquaculture aspect, FPH was considered as the immunomodulatory to stimulate the nonspecific immune defense system of fish [13]. Decreased infection rates and increased survival rates were recorded in some fish species after challenging to pathogenic bacteria [14–16]. Antibacterial peptides from fish have the potential for using them as therapeutic agents in aquaculture due to their antimicrobial activities and immunomodulatory functions. However, antibacterial peptides often exhibited species-specific antibacterial activities, which have proven to be specific inhibitory abilities against different bacteria [17, 18]. Nowadays, there are few reports on whether FPH has a direct antibacterial effect on pathogenic bacteria commonly found in aquaculture. Therefore, an evidence of the antibacterial activity of FPH against aquaculture-associated pathogens is needed to facilitate its application in aquafeeds.

In our previous study with turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), the analysis of intestinal microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that a moderate amount of FPH reduced the abundance of the distal intestinal Vibrio at the genus level [19]. It implied that FPH may affect the abundance of Vibrio in the intestine. In turbot culture, Vibrio spp. was the most important pathogen causing the outbreak of bacterial diseases [20]. Pathogenic Vibrio strains have been identified, including V. harveyi [21], V. anguillarum [22], and V. scophthalmi [23]. In this study, we first analyzed the antibacterial activity of FPH against the above three Vibrio strains in vitro. Then, one of the strains was chosen, which FPH had the strongest inhibitory activity against it. After that, this study further investigated the effect of FPH on growth performance, nonspecific immune response, intestinal microbiota, and disease resistance of turbot before and after being challenged with the selected Vibrio strain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antibacterial Activity of FPH

2.1.1. Production of FPH

The hydrolysis method reported by Zheng et al. [24] had been used to obtain FPH. Byproducts of Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) were minced using a B-400 mixer (Büchi, Switzerland). Then, 100 g of sample was mixed with 100 mL of distilled water and heated at 90°C for 10 min to inactivate the endogenous enzymes. The reaction of enzymatic hydrolysis was conducted with two enzymes of Alcalase (Novozymes, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) and Flavourzyme (Novozymes). Fish byproducts were hydrolyzed with Alcalase and Flavourzyme with enzyme-substrate ratios of 1:1:100 (v:w:w). The initial pH value was adjusted to 8.5–9.0, and then the pH was not adjusted again throughout the hydrolysis process. The temperature was maintained at 55°C for 3 h. At the end of the reaction, the mixture of enzyme and substrate was heated gradually from 55 to 90°C and then kept at 90°C for 20 min to ensure enzyme inactivation. The mixture was centrifuged at 3000 g for 3 min. The supernatant was the liquid FPH, and the powdered sample was then obtained by the processes of rotary evaporation and freeze–drying. FPH was stored at −20°C for subsequent experiments.

2.1.2. Preparation of Microbiological Culture Medias With FPH

The composition of microbiological culture medias (tryptic soy broth, TSB) is provided in Table 1. The proteinaceous materials (tryptone and soy peptone) in the TSB medium were replaced by FPH at the levels of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% to keep the iso-nitrogen. The TSB media without FPH (0%) was used as the control treatment.

Table 1.

Microbiological culture medias with graded levels of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH)^a.

Ingredient	0%	25%	50%	75%	100%
Tryptone (g)	17.00	12.75	8.5	4.25	0.00
Soy peptone (g)	3.00	2.25	1.5	0.75	0.00
FPH (g)	0.00	6.07	12.14	18.21	24.28
Glucose (g)	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5
K₂HPO₄·3H₂O (g)	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.5
NaCl (g)	10	10	10	10	10
Protein content (%)	18.64	18.64	18.64	18.64	18.64

Open in a new tab

^aTryptone and soy peptone were replaced by 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% FPH of total protein.

2.1.3. Bacteria and Antibacterial Assays

V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, and V. scophthalmi were obtained from the Division of Maricultural Organism Disease Control and Molecular Pathology, the Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, and the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences. Isolated V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, and V. scophthalmi bacteria cultures were inoculated in TSB agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The cultured isolate was inoculated in 5 mL TSB medium with 120 rpm/min at 37°C for 5–6 h, and the optical density (OD, λ = 600) value was adjusted to be 0.5. Isolated V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, and V. scophthalmi were sent for 16S rRNA sequencing, and then nucleotide sequences were used to run a blast at NCBI to validate the three strains of Vibrio.

The antibacterial activity was first measured using the agar well diffusion method descripted by Aqil et al. [25] with some modifications. The inoculum (150 μL) with V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, or V. scophthalmi was spread evenly on TSB agar plates. About 6 mm diameter wells were punched in the agar medium (4 mm depth) and filled with 20 µL of 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/mL FPH, 20–100 μg/mL the antibiotic (florfenicol) (the positive treatment), and 15 mg/mL NaCl (the negative treatment) based on our preliminary experiments. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h in an aerobic environment.

Turbidometric assay was used to measure the antibacterial activity according to the method reported by Raghupathi et al. [26] with some modifications. The activated bacteria were prepared from isolated colonies of agar streak plates and then were inoculating at 37°C in 5 mL TSB until the OD value at 600 nm was 1.0 based on the eliminated background (TSB). And then, different bacteria were diluted 1/500 in the TSB medium supplemented with graded levels of FPH (Table 1). The bacterial growth curves were obtained by measuring the OD at 600 nm. The OD values of bacteria were monitored every 2 for 24 h, except V. scophthalmi, which was monitored for 30 h.

The concentration of the target bacteria was measured by the plate count method to evaluate the antibacterial activity [27, 28]. The activated bacteria from isolated colonies of agar streak plates were diluted in 2 mL physiological saline. And then, 200 μL of bacterial cell suspensions were added to 3 mL test medium with graded levels of FPH (Table 1). The liquid inoculums were incubated at 37°C until one of the OD values (λ = 600) from five test medium reached 1.0. Subsequently, the bacteria were gradually diluted to 10⁻⁵, 10⁻⁶, and 10⁻⁷ dilutions (about 1000, 100, and 10 CFUs). About 200 μL aliquots of each dilution were placed to agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Colonies (30–300 CFUs) were counted manually to calculate the concentration of the target bacteria.

2.2. Experimental Diets, Experimental Fish, and Feeding Trial

Three isonitrogen and isolipid diets were formulated at ~500 g/kg crude protein and ~100 g/kg crude lipid. The control diet contained a high level of FM (480 g/kg) and a low level of plant protein mixture (100 g/kg soybean meal [SM], 50 g/kg wheat gluten, and 60 g/kg corn gluten meal). According to the studies with turbot reported by Bonaldo et al. [29] and Gu et al. [30], 100 g/kg FM in the control diet was replaced by 150 g/kg SM to serve as the SM diet. In addition, 100 g/kg FPH (the FPH diet) based on our previous studies [19, 31] was supplemented to the SM diet at the expense of 100 g/kg FM. The formulation and proximate composition of experimental diets are presented in Table 2. To prepare the diets, all the ingredients except FPH were crushed and sieved through 0.18 mm sieve, and then the ingredients were mixed well step by step according to the experimental formulation. FPH was dissolved with water, added into the ingredients, and mixed well. Pellets with a diameter of about 3 mm were made by a laboratory scale pelleter, and the diets were stored at −20°C before use.

Table 2.

Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets (g/kg dry matter).

Ingredients	Control	SM	FPH
Fish meal	480	380	280
SM	100	250	250
Wheat gluten	50	50	50
Corn gluten meal	60	60	60
FPH	0	0	100
Wheat meal	201	145	139
Fish oil	63	69	75
Soybean lecithin	15	15	15
Mineral premix^a	5	5	5
Vitamin premix^b	10	10	10
Ca (H₂PO₄)₂	10	10	10
Choline chloride	4	4	4
Vitamin C	2	2	2
Proximate composition
Moisture	50.5	44.6	78.4
Crude protein	512.0	513.0	528.4
Crude lipid	97.4	96.9	102.0
Ash	101.4	98.1	92.0

Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; SM, soybean meal.

^aMineral premix (g/kg premix): FeSO₄ · H₂O, 112.7 g; ZnSO₄ · H₂O, 45.2 g; MnSO₄ · H₂O, 9.3 g; CuSO₄ · 5H₂O, 3.7 g; CoCl₂ · 6H₂O, 0.4 g; Na₂SeO₃, 0.1 g; Ca (IO₃)₂, 0.3 g.

^bVitamin premix (IU or g/kg premix): Vitamin A acetate, 1,140,000 IU; Vitamin D3, 180,000 IU; DL-α-tocopherol acetate, 7.6 g; Menadione, 1.2 g; Thiamin nitrate, 0.93 g; Riboflavin, 1.35 g; Pyridoxine hydrochloride, 1.10 g; Cyanocobalamine, 0.0075 g; D-Calcium pantothenate, 4.5 g; Nicotinamide, 6.75 g; Folic acid, 0.465 g; D, biotin; 0.0475 g; Inositol, 10 g.

The experimental fish were turbot with an initial body weight of about 47 g, purchased from Shandong Kehe Ocean High Technology Co. Ltd. (Weihai, China) and transported to Huanghai Aquaculture Co. Ltd. (Yantai, China) for the feeding trial. Fish were temporarily reared for 3 weeks using a commercial feed to acclimatize to the culture conditions. Then, fish were starved for 24 h and randomly assigned to nine tanks (0.7 m × 0.7 m × 0.4 m). Three diets were assigned to the tanks (n = 3), with 30 fish in each tank. Each tank of fish was divided into three batches, and fish were individually selected in each batch, with a total of 10 fish selected and weighed and then randomly placed into the tank. Fish were fed to apparent satiation at 7:00 and 18:30 in a flow-through culture system with individual air stones. During the 44-day culture period, the water temperature was 17–19°C, the salinity was 30, the pH was about 7.8, and the dissolved oxygen content was 6–7 mg/L.

2.3. Sample Collection

At the start of the feeding trial, 10 turbot were randomly taken for proximate analysis of the body and stored at −20°C. At the end of the feeding trial, fish were starved for 24 h and then weighed and counted to calculate the parameters related to growth performance. Six fish were randomly taken from each tank and anesthetized with MS-222 at 30 mg/L. Blood samples were collected from the caudal vasculature to 1.5-mL tubes using heparinized needles and then were allowed to clot at 4°C for 4 h and centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min to obtain the serum. After blood sampling, four turbot were dissected and randomly taken from each tank to collect head kidney and intestine (proximal, middle, and distal) tissues based on our previous study [32]. Parts of intestinal tissues from the four fish were also collected and fixed in Bouin's solution for histological processing. The remaining two fish from each tank were randomly selected and stored at −20°C for body composition analysis [33].

2.4. V. harveyi Challenge

The above-mentioned V. harveyi was used in the current bacterial challenge experiment. V. harveyi was inoculated on 2216E medium and incubated at 37°C for 24 h for the recovery of the bacteria, followed by expanded incubation on 2216E plates at 37°C for 24 h. The strains were diluted with physiological saline to 1 × 10⁸ CFU/mL in the suspension based on our preliminary LD50 experiments. The remaining turbot, after sampling, were injected intraperitoneally with a dose of 200 μL per fish. Fish were checked at 12-h intervals after injection, and the number of dead fish was recorded. During the period of bacterial challenge, fish did not consume the experimental diet because of the injection stress. Sampling was initiated when the first mortality was observed at 24 h following injection. The specific sampling procedure was the same as the sampling procedure described in Section 2.3, except that intestinal tissues for histological processing and whole fish were not collected.

2.5. Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant, and Immunological Parameters

The detections of albumin (ALB), total protein (TP), total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), glutamic oxalic aminotransferase (GOP), glutamic pyruvic aminotransferase (GPT), lysozyme (LZM), and total nitric oxide synthase (T-NOS) in the serum had been performed using their respective commercial kits (ALB assay kit, cat#A028-2-1; the TP assay kit, cat#A045-4-2; T-SOD assay kit, cat#A001-1-2; CAT assay kit, cat#A007-1-1; GSH-PX assay kit, cat#A005-1-2; MDA assay kit, cat#A003-1-2; MPO assay kit, cat#A044-1-1; aspartate aminotransferase assay kit, cat#C010-2-1; alanine aminotransferase assay kit, cat#C009-2-1; LZM assay kit, cat#A050-1-1; T-NOS assay kit, cat#A014-2-2) following the manufacturer's protocols. The levels of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Complement 3 (C3) in the serum were measured using two commercial kits (IgM assay kit, cat#H109-1-2; C3 assay kit, cat#H186-1-2) with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). All commercial kits used in this study were provided by NanJing JianCheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China).

2.6. Gene Expression Analyses

Gene expression analyses were performed based on our previous study [34]. Briefly, total RNA from the head kidney, proximal intestine, and middle intestine were extracted using AG RNAex Pro Reagent (cat#AG21102, Accurate, Changsha, China), and cDNA templates were synthesized using Evo M-MLV RT Mix Kit (cat#AG11705, Accurate, Changsha, China). The amplification efficiencies of the primers for the target and reference genes were kept ranging from 95% to 105% using a standard curve with four-fold dilution. Relative expression of target genes was analyzed using the 2^−∆∆Ct method after quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). β-Actin and ribosomal protein L19 (rpl19) were served as the reference genes (Table 3). The qRT-PCR program included an initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles (95°C, 5 s; 57°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s) and end with a melt curve analysis provided by a Roche LightCycler 96 system (Roche, Switzerland). The reaction was carried out in 10 μL of total volumes, including 1 μL of cDNA template, 5 μL of SYBR Green Pro Taq HS Premix II (cat#AG11702, Accurate, Changsha, China), 0.3 μL of forward primer, 0.3 μL of reverse primer, and 3.4 μL of sterilized water.

Table 3.

Sequence of primers for quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

Gene	Primer sequence (5′−3′)	Product length	Gene Bank^a
il-1β	F-CTACCTGTCGTGCCAACA R-TAGAACAGAAATCGCACCAT	117	XM_035640817.2
il-6	F-AATCACCCACGGCTGCATTA R-TTGCATTGTCCCAGAGCCAT	92	XM_035621201.2
il-8	F-GGCAGACCCCTTGAAGAATA R-TGGTGAACCCTTCCCATTAT	138	XM_035638413.2
tnf-α	F-TAGGCTTCAACGCGTCTCTG R-CTGGAACACTGCACCCAGAT	122	FJ654645.1
il-10	F-AACGGGCTGATGCTCTAACC R-GAGCGTAAGGCTGGCTAGTT	108	XM_035632547.2
β-actin	F-CCAAAGCCAACAGGGAGAA R-AGAGGCATACAGGGACAGCACA	101	AY008305.1
rpl19	F-GCACATGTACCACAGCCTCT R-GGCCTCCTTCGTCTTAGAGC	157	XM_047328333.1

Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: il-1β, interleukin-1β; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction; rpl19, ribosomal protein L19; tnf-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

^aNCBI GenBank accession no.

2.7. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing

The samples of the middle and distal intestines were sent for DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing at the Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Briefly, intestinal tissues were subjected to DNA extraction using a MagAtrract PowerSoil Pro DNA Kit (cat# 4898129, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the premiers of 27F (5′-AGRGTTYGATYMTGGCTCAG−3′) and 1492R (5′-RGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT−3′). The PCR products were purified using the AMPure PB beads (Pacific Biosciences, CA, USA) and quantified with Qubit 4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). The DNA library was constructed using the SMRTbell prep kit 3.0 (Pacific Biosciences, CA, USA) and then sequenced on the Pacbio Sequel IIe System (Pacific Biosciences, CA, USA). High-fidelity (HiFi) reads were generated from the subreads by the CCS mode of SMRT-Link v11.0. HiFi reads were identified based on the barcode, and the sequences of 1000−1800bp were retained. UPARSE 7.1 (http://drive5.com/uparse/, version 7.1) was used to obtain operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on the optimized-HiFi reads with 97% sequence similarity. RDP classifier (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/, version 2.11) was used to annotate OTU species taxonomies against the Silva 16S rRNA gene database (Silva v138), with a confidence threshold of 70%, and the community composition of each sample was counted at different species classification levels. Alpha diversity indices, including Sobs, Shannon, Simpson, Ace, Chao1, and Pielou-e, were calculated with Mothur v1.30.1 (http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Calculators).

2.8. Intestinal Morphology

Fixed samples from middle and distal intestine tissues were processed for histological analysis based on the procedure reported in our previous study [19]. Samples were dehydrated in ethanol dilutions and embedded in paraffin to obtain intestinal transversal sections. Paraffin-embedded tissues were cut at 5 µm thickness and then stained with hematoxylin solution and eosin dye. The morphology of the intestine was photographed with a Pannoramic MIDI scanner (3DHISTECH Ltd., Hungary). The investigation of histology was focused on villus height, wall thickness, and goblet cell and processed by the ImageJ.

2.9. The qRT-PCR Assay in Detecting V. harveyi of Middle and Distal Intestine After the Challenge

The vhhp2 gene (NCBI GenBank: FJ025787.1) was used as a specific target gene of V. harveyi for the qRT-PCR assay. The primers (Vh-F: 5′- GTGGTGGCGAACTGGATGTAA −3′; Vh-R: 5′- GAGTATTCGTTGCCGAGTAAAGC -3′) with 151-bp PCR product had been used to detect V. harveyi [35].

The designed primers of vhhp2 gene were validated, and a standard curve was established according to the precious method with some modifications [36, 37]. The V. harveyi strain was activated, and the genomic DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (cat# DP302, Tiangen, Beijing, China). The concentration of the genomic DNA was diluted to 100 ng/μL with sterile water. The bacterial genomic DNA (100 ng/μL) was re-diluted to 4⁻¹, 4⁻², 4⁻³, 4⁻⁴, 4⁻⁵, 4⁻⁶, 4⁻⁷, 4⁻⁸, 4⁻⁹, and 4⁻¹⁰ dilutions, which were used as templates for qRT-PCR based on the primers of vhhp2 gene. The reaction system was 5 μL SYBR Green Pro Taq HS Premix II, 0.25 μL Vh-F (10 μmol/L), 0.25 μL Vh-R (10 μmol/L), 0.5 μL DNA template, and 4 μL sterilized water. The qRT-PCR was programed as follows: 95°C for 30 s and 40 cycles (95°C, 5 s; 60°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s). After that, genomic DNA was extracted from the middle and distal intestine of turbot using the TIANamp Marine Animals DNA Kit (cat# DP324, Tiangen, Beijing, China). The qRT-PCR was carried out using Vh-F/Vh-R mentioned above as primers and 100 ng/μL genomic DNA as templates. The reaction system was as follows: 5 μL SYBR Green Pro Taq HS Premix II, 0.25 μL Vh-F (10 μmol/L), 0.25 μL Vh-R (10 μmol/L), 2 μL DNA template, and 2.5 μL sterilized water. The qRT-PCR conditions was 95°C for 30 s and 45 cycles (95°C, 5 s; 60°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The data, except for the survival analysis after the V. harveyi challenge and the relative abundance of OTUs at the phylum and genus levels, were presented as mean values ± standard error. These data were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (SPSS 16.0, IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA). And then, a Tukey-HSD test was used for multiple comparisons when significant differences (p < 0.05) were detected. The survival analysis after V. harveyi challenge was subjected to Kaplan–Meier analysis with a log-rank (SPSS 16.0). In addition, the parameters (serum biochemical, antioxidant, and immunological parameters, the gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the proximate intestine, middle intestine, and head kidney, as well as the α-diversity index of the distal intestinal microbiota) before and after V. harveyi challenge were compared using independent sample T-test (SPSS 16.0).

3. Results

3.1. Antibacterial Activity of FPH

Figure 1 shows the antibacterial activity of FPH against V. harveyi, V. scophthalmi, and V. anguillarum. Although the inhibition zones were very narrow, they were observed against V. harveyi at 500 and 1000 mg/mL of FPH and against V. scophthalmi at 1500 mg/mL of FPH. In addition, FPH did not generate the inhibition zone for V. anguillarum at 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/mL of FPH.

Antimicrobial activity of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) against *Vibrio harveyi* (A), *V. scophthalmi* (B), and *V. anguillarum* (C). The experiments were repeated at least three times, and representative results were presented in the figures.

Figure 2 shows the growth curve of V. harveyi, V. scophthalmi, and V. anguillarum in the presence of graded levels of FPH. FPH at the level of 100% inhibited the growth of V. harveyi, V. scophthalmi, and V. anguillarum compared to that at the level of 0%. The inhibitory effect of the growth of V. harveyi was observed in the presence of FPH at the level of 50% and 75% (incubation time 2–8 h) compared to the 0% FPH. In addition, no inhibitory effect of 25% FPH was detected in any of the bacterial growth.

Inhibitory effect of graded levels of fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) on bacterial [(A) *V. harveyi*; (B) *V. scophthalmi*; and (C) *V. anguillarum*] growth. The x-axis indicates the incubation time (h), and the y-axis indicates the optical density (OD) measured at 600 nm. The experiments were repeated at least three times, and the average OD was presented in the figures.

Table 4 shows bacterial counts of V. harveyi, V. scophthalmi, and V. anguillarum in microbiological culture medias with graded levels of FPH. V. harveyi count in the level of 25% FPH was significantly higher than that of the level of 0% FPH (p < 0.05), while no V. harveyi were detected in culture medias of 50%, 75%, and 100% FPH. V. scophthalmi count in the level of 50% FPH was significantly higher than that of 100% FPH (p < 0.05) but significantly lower than that of 0% and 25% FPH (p < 0.05). V. anguillarum count decreased significantly (p < 0.05) only when the replacement level of FPH reached 50% and 100% in the culture medias compared with the control group (0% FPH).

Table 4.

Bacterial counts of V. harveyi, V. scophthalmi, and V. anguillarum in microbiological culture medias with graded levels of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) (CFU/mL).

Microorganism	0%	25%	50%	75%	100%
V. harveyi	[(3.0 ± 0.50) × 10⁸]^b	[(6.1 ± 0.5) × 10⁸]^a	—	—	—
V. scophthalmi	[(6.4 ± 0.7) × 10⁸]^a	[(4.5 ± 0.3) × 10⁸]^a	[(1.3 ± 0.0) × 10⁸]^b	[(1.3 ± 0.1) × 10⁸]^bc	[(9.1 ± 0.8) × 10⁷]^c
V. anguillarum	[(1.8 ± 0.2) × 10⁸]^a	[(2.2 ± 0.3) × 10⁸]^a	[(2.1 ± 0.2) × 10⁸]^a	[(1.1 ± 0.1) × 10⁸]^b	[(2.9 ± 0.2) × 10⁷]^b

Open in a new tab

Note: Values are means and standard error of three replicate treatments. Values in the same row followed by different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). The data of V. harveyi was subjected to T-test. Other data were log10 transformed and then subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's multiple comparison test.

3.2. The Growth and Feed Utilization

Table 5 shows the growth and feed utilization in turbot before V. harveyi challenge. There were no significant differences in final body weight, weight gain, specific growth rate, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency ratio, and protein productive value among the dietary treatments (p > 0.05). However, final body weight, weight gain, and specific growth rate in the fish fed the diet containing a high level of SM had a decreasing trend (p > 0.05) compared to the FPH diet with the same level of SM. The survival rate was 84.4% in the SM group, which was more than 10% lower than that in the control and FPH groups, although there was no significant difference between treatments (p > 0.05).

Table 5.

The growth and feed utilization of turbot.

Item	Control	SM	FPH
Initial body weight (g)	47.00 ± 0.58	47.44 ± 0.99	48.67 ± 1.15
Final body weight (g)	77.36 ± 3.73	76.33 ± 2.12	80.33 ± 3.05
Survival rate^a (%)	95.56 ± 1.11	84.44 ± 4.44	95.55 ± 2.22
Weight gain^b (%)	64.61 ± 7.88	60.88 ± 3.20	65.01 ± 4.06
Specific growth rate^c (%/day)	1.13 ± 0.11	1.08 ± 0.05	1.14 ± 0.05
Feed intake^d (%/day)	1.59 ± 0.10	1.70 ± 0.02	1.80 ± 0.08
Feed conversion ratio^e	1.57 ± 0.18	1.60 ± 0.05	1.63 ± 0.11
Protein efficiency ratio^f	1.34 ± 0.06	1.21 ± 0.04	1.17 ± 0.09
Protein productive value^g (%)	23.42 ± 3.04	21.51 ± 3.04	18.70 ± 0.32

Open in a new tab

Note: Values are means and standard error of three replicate tanks. Values in the same row followed by different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukeys' multiple comparison test.

Abbreviations: FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; SM, soybean meal.

^aSurvival rate (%) = 100 × (final fish number/initial fish number).

^bWeight gain (%) = 100 × (final body weight − initial body weight)/initial body weight.

^cSpecific growth rate (%/day) = 100 × [ln (final body weight) − ln (initial body weight)]/feeding days.

^dFeed intake (%/day) = 100 × total feed intake/[feeding days × (initial body weight + final body weight)/2].

^eFeed conversion ratio = dry feed intake/body weight gain.

^fProtein efficiency ratio = (final body weight − initial body weight)/dietary protein intake.

^gProtein productive value (%) = 100 × (crude protein content of final body − crude protein content of initial body)/dietary protein intake.

3.3. Histology of Middle and Distal Intestine

Table 6, Figures 3 and 4 show the histology of the middle and distal intestine in turbot before V. harveyi challenge. The number of goblet cells in the middle intestine was the highest in the FPH group at 1319.83, which was 27.79% and 43.69% higher than that in the control and SM group, respectively, although there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between them. In the distal intestine, the proportion of villus height (> 1000 mm) in the SM group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the control and FPH groups. Similar to the results of the middle intestine, the number of goblet cells in the distal intestine was the highest in the FPH group at 1111.33, which was 26.84% and 20.95% higher (p > 0.05) than that of the control and SM groups, respectively.

Table 6.

Histology of middle and distal intestine in turbot before V. harveyi challenge.

Item	Control	SM	FPH
Middle intestine
The distribution (%) of villus height
0–100 (μm)	12.80 ± 5.11	22.42 ± 4.61	12.00 ± 2.34
101–500 (μm)	53.67 ± 4.79	40.65 ± 2.48	45.21 ± 4.83
501–1000 (μm)	31.45 ± 4.74	29.70 ± 2.12	38.87 ± 1.73
>1000 (μm)	2.08 ± 0.86	7.23 ± 2.63	3.92 ± 1.47
The number of goblet cell	1032.83 ± 102.57	918.50 ± 116.03	1319.83 ± 97.71
Distal intestine
The distribution (%) of villus height
0–100 (μm)	20.66 ± 5.19	10.61 ± 1.57	10.03 ± 4.05
101–500 (μm)	47.22 ± 6.39	40.63 ± 2.39	58.13 ± 8.28
501–1000 (μm)	32.12 ± 1.24	36.11 ± 4.99	26.76 ± 8.00
>1000 (μm)	0^b	12.35 ± 1.90^a	5.08 ± 2.56^b
The number of goblet cell	876.17 ± 137.86	918.83 ± 110.83	1111.33 ± 176.10

Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; SM, soybean meal.

Example images of middle intestinal histology in turbot before *V. harveyi* challenge: (A, B, C) represent the Control, SM, and FPH group at a 40x magnification, respectively; (D, E, F) represent the Control, SM, and FPH group at a 200x magnification, respectively. FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; SM, soybean meal.

Example images of distal intestinal histology in turbot before *V. harveyi* challenge: (A, B, C) represent the Control, SM, and FPH group at a 40x magnification, respectively; (D, E, F) represent the Control, SM, and FPH group at a 200x magnification, respectively. FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; SM, soybean meal.

3.4. Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant, and Immunological Parameters

Table 7 shows the biochemical, antioxidant, and immunological parameters of serum in turbot before or after V. harveyi challenge. The activities of CAT and MPO, as well as the level of IgM in serum, were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by dietary treatments before V. harveyi challenge. The activities of serum CAT and MPO in the FPH group were significantly lower (p < 0.05) compared with the control and SM groups, while fish fed the FPH diet exhibited higher (p < 0.05) level of serum IgM.

Table 7.

Serum biochemical, antioxidant, and immunological parameters in turbot before or after V. harveyi challenge.

Item	Control	SM	FPH
Before V. harveyi challenge
Alb (g/L)	7.75 ± 0.60	8.80 ± 1.03	9.97 ± 0.98
TP (g/L)	30.23 ± 1.62	26.22 ± 1.61	30.34 ± 1.12
T-SOD (U/mL)	30.71 ± 0.79	32.40 ± 0.04	32.01 ± 1.27
CAT (U/mL)	29.23 ± 2.02^a	26.19 ± 1.43^a	13.45 ± 1.52^b
GSH-PX (U/mL)	56.92 ± 6.99	52.89 ± 5.09	56.89 ± 5.96
MDA (nmol/mL)	13.22 ± 0.83	13.90 ± 0.41	13.28 ± 0.24
MPO (U/L)	303.45 ± 0.16^b	338.36 ± 6.19^a	237.03 ± 8.94^c
GOT (U/L)	16.26 ± 2.15	24.12 ± 0.94	17.63 ± 2.33
GPT (U/L)	9.59 ± 1.02	11.62 ± 0.62	10.29 ± 1.06
LZM (μg/mL)	7.41 ± 0.26	7.08 ± 0.24	7.94 ± 0.18
T-NOS (U/mL)	26.38 ± 1.96	27.99 ± 1.90	31.45 ± 1.12
IgM (μg/ml)	309.27 ± 17.12^b	305.88 ± 33.24^b	472.75 ± 46.12^a
C3 (μg/ml)	888.02 ± 49.84	766.08 ± 106.48	1011.82 ± 159.79
After V. harveyi challenge
Alb (g/L)	7.77 ± 0.35^a	3.59 ± 0.63^b	4.85 ± 0.69^ab
TP (g/L)	19.17 ± 0.57^b	12.51 ± 0.84^c	24.57 ± 0.40^a
T-SOD (U/mL)	24.55 ± 0.63	26.03 ± 1.08	23.64 ± 1.16
CAT (U/mL)	27.42 ± 2.47	17.17 ± 0.59	20.02 ± 2.60
GSH-PX (U/ml)	18.29 ± 1.89	22.41 ± 2.81	15.75 ± 1.22
MDA (nmol/mL)	9.88 ± 0.27^a	7.96 ± 0.35^b	8.59 ± 0.35^ab
MPO (U/L)	358.68 ± 8.51	375.67 ± 12.42	347.97 ± 15.64
GOT (U/L)	21.98 ± 0.64	20.73 ± 0.95	19.66 ± 2.21
GPT (U/L)	16.51 ± 0.67	14.45 ± 0.41	16.29 ± 0.73
LZM (μg/mL)	7.43 ± 0.10^b	8.18 ± 0.02^a	8.14 ± 0.05^a
T-NOS (U/mL)	17.52 ± 1.21	20.65 ± 0.50	21.47 ± 0.91
IgM (μg/mL)	272.11 ± 17.07	297.39 ± 17.88	321.85 ± 29.06
C3 (μg/mL)	857.06 ± 88.34	927.92 ± 58.80	708.23 ± 45.96

Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: ALB, albumin; C3, complement 3; CAT, catalase; FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; GOP, glutamic oxalic aminotransferase; GPT, glutamic pyruvic aminotransferase; GSH-PX, glutathione peroxidase; IgM, immunoglobulin M; LZM, lysozyme; MDA, malondialdehyde; MPO, myeloperoxidase; SM, soybean meal; T-NOS, total nitric oxide synthase; TP, total protein; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase.

After V. harveyi challenge, the activity of LZM, as well as the levels of ALB, TP, and MDA, were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by dietary treatments. Fish fed the SM diet showed the lowest levels (p < 0.05) of serum ALB, TP, and MDA. In addition, the activity of serum LZM in the control group was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that of the SM and FPH groups.

Serum biochemical, antioxidant, and immunological parameters of all treatments were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge (Supporting Information 2: Figure S1). The levels or activities of biochemical (TP), antioxidant (T-SOD, GSH-PX, and MDA), and immunological (NOS) parameters in all the treatments were significantly higher (p < 0.05) before the challenge than those after the challenge. The level of Alb from the SM and FPH groups, the activity of CAT from the SM group, and the level of IgM from the FPH group were significantly higher (p < 0.05) before the challenge compared with those after the challenge. In addition, the activities of MPO from the control and FPH groups, as well as GPT from all the groups, significantly increased (p < 0.05) after the challenge.

3.5. The Gene Expression of Immune-Related Inflammatory Cytokines

Figure 5 shows the gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the proximate intestine, middle intestine, and head kidney of turbot before V. harveyi challenge. Among the four pro-inflammatory cytokines (il-1β, interleukin-1β; tnf-α, tumor necrosis factor α; il-6; il-8), only the expression of il-1β was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the proximate intestine of the control group than that of the SM group, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the control and the FPH group. The expression of il-1β in the head kidney among all the treatments showed a similar trend compared with it in the proximate intestine. The anti-inflammatory factors (il-10) in the intestine, middle intestine, and head kidney did not exhibit a significant difference (p > 0.05) between dietary treatments.

The gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the proximate intestine (PI), middle intestine (MI), and head kidney (HK) of turbot before *V. harveyi* challenge. *il-1β*, interleukin-1β; *tnf-α*, tumor necrosis factor α. Values are means ± standard error of three replicate tanks. Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukeys' multiple comparison test.

Figure 6 shows the gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines after V. harveyi challenge. The expression of middle intestine il-1β was significantly downregulated (p < 0.05) in fish fed the SM and FPH diets compared with the control diet. The expression of il-6 in the middle intestine and il-8 in the proximate and middle intestines exhibited a similar trend between treatments, where the lowest mRNA level (p < 0.05) was observed in fish fed the FPH diet.

The gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the proximate intestine (PI), middle intestine (MI), and head kidney (HK) of turbot after *V. harveyi* challenge. *il-1β*, interleukin-1β; tnf-α, tumor necrosis factor α. Values are means ± standard error of three replicate tanks. Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukeys' multiple comparison test.

The gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the proximate intestine, middle intestine, and head kidney were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge (Supporting Information 2: Figures S2–S4). The expression of the proximate intestine, middle intestine, and head kidney il-1β and il-8 in all the groups was significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) after the challenge than that before the challenge. For the expression of il-10, significant upregulation (p < 0.05) after the challenge was observed in the head kidney from all the groups and in the proximate intestine from the control and SM groups, while significant downregulation (p < 0.05) was observed in the middle intestine from the FPH group. In addition, the expression of tnf-α after the challenge was significantly lower in the middle intestine from all the groups compared with that before the challenge.

3.6. Survival Analysis and Relative Concentration of V. harveyi in the Intestine

Figure 7 shows the survival analysis of turbot after V. harveyi challenge by using the Kaplan–Meier survival curve. The first fish mortality was recorded in the control and FPH groups at 24 h after V. harveyi challenge. Survival probability in fish fed the control diet was lower than 50% at 2 days after V. harveyi challenge. In addition, from the 2 days of V. harveyi challenge to the 5 days, the mortality rate observed in the FPH group was much lower than that in the control and SM groups. At the 5 days of V. harveyi challenge, the highest of survival probability was observed in the FPH diet. Based on the log-rank test, the p value was 0.023, which indicated that survival curves were significantly affected by dietary treatments.

Survival analysis of turbot after *V. harveyi* challenge. Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to estimate the overall survival rate between treatments. Daily fish deaths were recorded after *V. harveyi* challenge with n = 30 for each treatment.

Figure 8 shows the standard curve of relative concentration of V. harveyi. The concentration of V. harveyi was transformed by the log 10 transformation, which was decreased linearly with Ct value of the vhhp2 gene using the qRT-PCR assay. It confirmed that the qRT-PCR assay for the vhhp2 gene could be used to assess the relative abundance of V. harveyi. Table 8 shows Ct value of the vhhp2 gene in the middle and distal intestine after V. harveyi challenge based on this method. The lowest Ct value of the vhhp2 gene in the middle intestine was observed in the control group, while there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between dietary treatments. In the distal intestine, the Ct value of the vhhp2 gene in the FPH group significantly increased (p < 0.05), followed by the SM and control groups. It indicated that the relative concentration of V. harveyi in the distal intestine was FPH < SM < Control.

Standard curve of the relative concentration of *V. harveyi*. The x-axis indicates Ct value provided by qRT-PCR based on the primers of *vhhp2* gene, and the y-axis indicates concentrations of *V. harveyi* genomic DNA for log10 transformation. Ct values are detected for three replicate samples (n = 3). qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction.

Table 8.

Ct values of the vhhp2 gene provided by quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the intestine after V. harveyi challenge.

Item	Control	SM	FPH
Middle intestine	27.29 ± 1.55	30.99 ± 1.19	30.66 ± 0.61
Distal intestine	26.26 ± 1.61^b	30.59 ± 1.14^ab	31.60 ± 0.69^a

Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; SM, soybean meal.

3.7. Microbiota of the Distal Intestine

Table 9 shows an α-diversity index of the distal intestinal microbiota of turbot before or after V. harveyi challenge. Regardless of V. harveyi challenge, all α- diversity parameters (Sobs, Shannon, Simpson, Ace, Chao1, and Pielou-e) at the phylum and genus levels were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between treatments. In addition, α-diversity parameters of the distal intestinal microbiota in all the treatments were compared before and after the challenge, but no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed at the phylum and genus levels (Figures S5 and S6).

Table 9.

Alpha-diversity index of the distal intestinal microbiota of turbot before or after V. harveyi challenge.

Item	Sobs	Shannon	Simpson	Ace	Chao1	Pielou-e
Before V. harveyi challenge
Phylum level
Control	9.00 ± 1.00	0.53 ± 0.07	0.69 ± 0.06	9.35 ± 1.12	9.00 ± 1.00	9.00 ± 1.00
SM	10.00 ± 1.00	0.65 ± 0.25	0.62 ± 0.16	10.33 ± 1.03	10.00 ± 1.00	10.00 ± 1.00
FPH	9.00 ± 2.65	0.19 ± 0.04	0.92 ± 0.03	13.54 ± 0.26	9.33 ± 2.73	9.00 ± 2.65
Genus level
Control	40.00 ± 14.18	0.73 ± 0.12	0.65 ± 0.06	59.18 ± 26.66	53.32 ± 20.08	0.20 ± 0.02
SM	81.67 ± 14.84	1.16 ± 0.36	0.52 ± 0.17	98.17 ± 10.87	111.83 ± 5.89	0.27 ± 0.08
FPH	52.67 ± 8.76	0.75 ± 0.27	0.63 ± 0.16	61.58 ± 10.09	60.22 ± 10.58	0.19 ± 0.07
After V. harveyi challenge
Phylum level
Control	10.00 ± 2.08	0.63 ± 0.12	0.66 ± 0.07	12.91 ± 2.65	11.00 ± 2.08	0.27 ± 0.04
SM	10.00 ± 1.73	0.62 ± 0.18	0.65 ± 0.12	11.44 ± 1.40	10.28 ± 1.59	0.27 ± 0.07
FPH	8.67 ± 1.45	0.34 ± 0.18	0.81 ± 0.14	10.37 ± 1.37	9.17 ± 1.74	0.16 ± 0.08
Genus level
Control	67.67 ± 22.42	0.89 ± 0.24	0.60 ± 0.10	85.71 ± 32.93	86.80 ± 34.36	0.21 ± 0.04
SM	73.67 ± 18.98	1.10 ± 0.31	0.56 ± 0.14	107.47 ± 22.83	101.75 ± 24.77	0.26 ± 0.07
FPH	51.33 ± 6.89	0.56 ± 0.24	0.76 ± 0.15	79.04 ± 2.38	81.43 ± 13.87	0.14 ± 0.06

Open in a new tab

Note: Values are means and standard error of three replicate tanks.

Abbreviations: FPH, fish protein hydrolysate; Pielou_e, pielou's evenness; SM, soybean meal.

Figure 9 shows the average relative abundance of the distal intestinal microbiota. The most dominance of distal intestinal microbiota at the phylum level were Proteobacteria and Firmicutes (Supporting Information 1: Tables S1, S2), which were not affected by experimental diets or by V. harveyi challenge. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Achromobacter was the highest among all the groups both before and after V. harveyi challenge. Before V. harveyi challenge, the Bacillus genus was the core microbiota in the control and SM groups with a relative abundance of 11.83% and 16.63%, respectively, while the Photobacterium genus was the core microbiota in the FPH group with a relative abundance of 13.06%. However, after V. harveyi challenge, Bacillus (16.33%) was still the core microbiota of the control group, and the relative abundance of Achromobacter in the FPH group increased to 95.5%, but no relative abundance exceeded 1% at the level of the remaining genera. Additionally, no Vibrio genus was found in the top 10 genera in all treatment groups before V. harveyi challenge, but the relative abundance of Vibrio genus increased significantly to the fourth dominant microbiota after V. harveyi challenge. The relative abundance of Vibrio genus in the SM group was the highest, followed by the FPH and control groups.

Average relative abundance of the distal intestinal microbiota of turbot. (A) The average relative abundance (n = 3) at the phylum level before *V. harveyi* challenge; (B) the average relative abundance (n = 3) at the genus level before *V. harveyi* challenge; (C) the average relative abundance (n = 3) at the phylum level after *V. harveyi* challenge; and (D) the average relative abundance (n = 3) at the genus level after *V. harveyi* challenge.

4. Discussion

FPH used in this study was made from byproducts of Pollock by enzymatic hydrolysis (Alcalase and Flavourzyme), which had been repeatedly verified for its growth-promoting effect on turbot [19, 31, 32]. Wang et al. [38] reported that growth performance and intestinal health of turbot would be deteriorated by high SM inclusion in diets. In this study, based on previous studies with turbot [29, 30], the level of SM in the SM and FPH diets was increased to 250 g/kg by replacing FM with SM. However, no statistically significant differences in growth and feed utilization were found between treatment groups. One possible explanation was that this study focused on investigating the immune and antibacterial effects of FPH; therefore, about 47 g of turbot with relatively higher initial body weight (more convenient sampling for intestinal microbiota analysis) were selected, and the period of the feeding trial was only 44 days (the experimental diets were almost exhausted at 44 days). It may result in the growth-promoting effects of FPH being masked to some extent due to the low weight gain causing by the short rearing period. However, the trend of positive effect of FPH on growth was still observed; 250 g/kg SM in diet reduced weight gain by 3.73% compared to the control (FM), while the value of weight gain in fish fed diet with FPH restored and exceed fish fed the control diet. It indicated that, even under the conditions of the present experiments, it was still partially to demonstrate that FPH indeed improved the utilization of SM and promoted fish growth.

In addition, the high-level inclusion of SM in diets induced intestinal inflammation in turbot [30]. Typical signs of enteritis in the intestine of turbot were a shortening of villus height, upregulated gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and downregulated gene expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines [38, 39]. In this study, these signs of enteritis in the intestine were not observed in the villus height and gene expression of inflammatory cytokines before V. harveyi challenge. The severity of enteritis caused by SM differed between fish species [40–42]. Gu et al. [30] reported that turbot had a higher tolerance to SM-induced inflammatory response, where the level of SM was ranging from 260 to 540 g/kg. It indicated that 250 g/kg SM in diets was likely the onset of the reaction in the intestine, which resulted in no marked enteritis before V. harveyi challenge. However, based on the comparison of the expression levels of these inflammatory cytokines before and after the challenge, it was found that the expression levels of il-1β, tnf-α, il-8, and il-10 were significantly increased or decreased in all treatment groups. V. harveyi has been shown to induce the upregulated expression of inflammatory cytokines via the p38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinases) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signal pathways [43]. It was supported by this study, where V. harveyi challenge induced the inflammatory response in the proximate and middle intestine or head kidney of turbot. Furthermore, after V. harveyi challenge, the expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines (il-1β, il-6, and il-8) was downregulated in fish fed the FPH diet compared to fish fed the SM or FM diet. Therefore, the current results suggested that FPH inclusion in diets may reduce the risk of inflammation occurring in the intestine due to V. harveyi infection [44].

Dietary nutrients are considered to play an important role in influencing the immunity and disease resistance of fish [45]. Plasma immune-related and antioxidant parameters are widely used as indicators in assessing the immunity and health status of fish [46, 47]. It was partly supported in this study, where the comparison of serum biochemical, antioxidant, and immunological parameters before and after V. harveyi challenge exhibited that some parameters (TP, T-SOD, GSH-PX, MDA, NOS, and GPT) of all treatment groups significantly increased or decreased. However, before the challenges, the sampling was done for 24 h of fish starvation, whereas after the challenge, the sampling was done for 48 h of fish starvation because the fish did not consume the experimental diets due to the injection stress. Therefore, the changes in those parameters before and after the challenges may not be caused only by V. harveyi challenge. In addition, FPH can function as an immune-stimulant to stimulate nonspecific immunity against pathogenic bacteria [48]. FPH supplementation enhanced nonspecific immune responses, such as the LZM activity as well as the levels of complement and IgM, which were recorded in barramundi (Lates calcarifer) [49], Japanese sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicas) [50], olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) [51], larger yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea R.) [52], red sea bream (Pagrus major) [53]. In this study, before challenging with V. harveyi, serum IgM level significantly increased in fish fed the diet supplemented with FPH, and the level of C3 increased by 13.9% and 32.1% (no statistical differences) compared with the control and SM group, respectively. In addition, the present results showed that LZM activity in both the FPH and SM groups was significantly higher than that in the control group after V. harveyi challenge, but it was not possible to determine whether the increase was caused by the substitution of FM by SM or FPH supplementation. MPO plays a key role in activated neutrophils during the immune response, which is function as the oxygen-dependent bactericidal activity. However, excessive release of MPO will be harmful for intact host tissues [54]. The activity of MPO in turbot fed the SM diet was significantly higher compared to the control diet before V. harveyi challenge, which indicated that a high level of SM in the diet resulted in the massive release of MPO. However, the FPH fed to the turbot reduced the possible damaging effects of SM on tissues caused by elevated MPO activity. This study also found the number of goblet cells in fish fed the FPH diet tended to be elevated in the middle and distal intestine, and similar results were observed in olive flounder [51] and Pompano (Trachinotus blochii) [15]. Goblet cells can exhibit improvement in innate immune responses of the intestine due to the secretion of mucus, antibacterial proteins, chemokines, and cytokines [55]. Taken together, nonspecific immune responses may be facilitated when FPH was supplemented to the diet of turbot. In addition, some studies have confirmed that FPH could improve the antioxidant capacity of some fish species, such as largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) [56] and barramundi [57]. The main reason was that antioxidant peptides were present in the FPH, which could directly donate hydrogen atoms to reactive oxygen species, deactivate molecular oxygen, scavenge free radicals, and chelate metal ions [4]. These antioxidant properties of FPH, in turn, reduced the activity of some antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase [16]. Similar results were observed in this study, where the activity of CAT significantly decreased in fish fed the FPH diet before V. harveyi challenge. Therefore, FPH enhancement of antioxidant capacity may also been observed in turbot.

The study of the antibacterial activity of FPH in vitro has previously been mainly in the field of food science. The reason is that FPH contains antimicrobial peptides, which can damage the integrity of the cell membrane by forming pores or by blocking the membrane ion gradients [58]. Furthermore, some antimicrobial peptides cause the death of bacteria by disrupting cellular metabolism instead of lysing the cell membrane [59, 60]. Therefore, FPH has been demonstrated its antibacterial effect against food-borne pathogenic bacteria, including Gram-positive (S. typhimurium and E. coli) and Gram-negative bacteria (L. innocua and L. monocytogenes) [12]. The antibacterial property of FPH is dependent on the raw material of hydrolysis, the enzyme type, the degree of hydrolysis, and molecular weight distribution [11, 12, 61]. In addition, the antibacterial activity of FPH is species-specific, for example, the inhibitory effect of FPH derived from Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) byproducts had a high sensitivity to S. typhimurium and L. monocytogenes, but a low sensitivity to E. coli [11]. In the present study, the result of the inhibition zone based on the agar well diffusion method showed that FPH prepared from Pollock byproducts in vitro exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against V. harveyi, followed by V. scophthalmi. Moreover, according to the bacterial growth and bacterial counts, FPH used in this study seemed to have a slightly antibacterial effect on V. anguillarum. These results indicated that FPH was bacteriostatic against pathogenic Vibrio strains from marine fish but was species-specific as the case with food-associated pathogens.

As for fish nutrition, the main focus is on evaluating the resistance of FPH in vivo against pathogenic bacteria after infection. For example, 20 g/kg FPH supplementation in diets increased the resistance to Streptococcus iniae in Nile tilapia [62] and to Aeromonas hydrophila in Pabda (Ompok pabda) [63]; Siddik et al. [49, 64] claimed that adding 61 g/kg improved survival rates in barramundi against V. harvei and S. iniae infection. In turbot, although there were no reports of FPH against pathogenic challenge, previous analysis of intestinal microbiota found that FPH reduced the abundance of Vibrio at the genus level [19]. However, in the current study, Vibrio was not observed among 10 dominant genera of intestinal microbiota before V. harveyi challenge. It may be due to the different rearing sites for the two experiments; the previous one was conducted at the Yantai Tianyuan Aquatic Product Co. Ltd., while the present one was conducted at Huanghai Aquaculture Co. Ltd. The composition of intestinal core microbiota may be altered by environmental rearing conditions [65], which had been reported in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) [66]. However, 24 h after intraperitoneal injection of V. harveyi to turbot, the abundance of intestinal Vibrio at the genus level significantly increased by analyzing 16S rRNA sequencing, demonstrating an altered composition of distal intestinal microbiota, especially the abundance of Vibrio. Meanwhile, the relative abundance of intestinal V. harveyi, as determined based on the qRT-PCR assay for the vhhp2 gene, was significantly reduced in the distal intestine of a turbot-fed diet containing FPH. These results were consistent with the abundance of distal intestinal Vibrio at the genus level and survival curves after V. harveyi challenge, which proved the inhibitory effect of FPH on V. harveyi in vivo. However, considering that after intraperitoneal injection of V. harvey, turbot refused to eat the experimental diets due to the injection stress, increased resistance to V. harvey herein mainly relied on FPH to improve nonspecific immune response. Similar results were found in the study with red seabream (Pagrus major), where increased the resistance to Edwardsiella tarda was by improving the innate immunity [67].

5. Conclusion

The present study revealed that the antimicrobial effect of FPH prepared from byproducts of Pollock exhibited species specificity for Vibrio strains from marine fish. Compared to V. scophthalmi and V. anguillarum, FPH showed stronger antibacterial activity against V. harveyi. Adding 100 g/kg FPH enhanced the nonspecific immunity of turbot by regulating a few antioxidant and immunological parameters of serum, as well as intestinal goblet cell, the abundance of distal intestinal Vibrio at the genus level, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, resulting in increasing resistance capacity to V. harveyi.

Acknowledgments

The authors express our gratitude to the Committee on Aquatic Animal Nutrition and Feed of the China Society of Fisheries for inviting the first author, Dr. Yuliang Wei, to make an oral presentation based on our study and share the abstract of this study [68].

Data Availability Statement

The datasets of microbial communities have been submitted to online repositories (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA1111883). Other data can be made available on request.

Ethics Statement

All protocols in the present study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Yuliang Wei was responsible for formal analysis, writing–original draft, project administration, and funding acquisition. Lu Wang, Yanlu Li, and Qiang Ma were responsible for the formal analysis and investigation. Houguo Xu and Mengqing Liang were responsible for supervision and funding acquisition.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972803 and 31902387), Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, YSFRI, CAFS (20603022023021), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS47), and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (2023TD52).

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

Supporting Information 1

The supporting information includes Tables S1 and S2 and Figures S1−S6. Table S1: average relative abundance at the phylum and genus levels of the distal intestinal microbiota in turbot before V. harveyi challenge; Table S2: average relative abundance at the phylum and genus levels of the distal intestinal microbiota in turbot after V. harveyi challenge.

3446155.f1.docx^{(17KB, docx)}

Supporting Information 2

Figure S1: Serum biochemical, antioxidant, and immunological parameters of all treatments were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge; Figure S2: The gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the proximate intestine was compared before and after V. harveyi challenge; Figure S3: The gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the middle intestine were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge; Figure S4: The gene expression of immune-related inflammatory cytokines in the head kidney were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge; Figure S5: Alpha-diversity index of the distal intestinal microbiota at phylum level were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge; Figure S6: Alpha-diversity index of the distal intestinal microbiota at genus level were compared before and after V. harveyi challenge.

3446155.f2.docx^{(533.4KB, docx)}

References

1.Hublin A., Malbaša H., Stanec Svedrović D., Jerman Vranić M. Using Life Cycle Assessment to Achieve a Circular Economy of Fish Waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization . 2024;15(7):4487–4499. doi: 10.1007/s12649-024-02474-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2.Naghdi S., Rezaei M., Heidari M. G., Tahergorabi R., Lorenzo J. M., Mirzaei F. Insights Into Fishery by-Product Application in Aquatic Feed and Food: A Review. Aquaculture International . 2024;32(5):5851–5910. doi: 10.1007/s10499-024-01447-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3.Madende M., Hayes M. Fish by-Product Use as Biostimulants: An Overview of the Current State of the Art, Including Relevant Legislation and Regulations Within the EU and USA. Molecules . 2020;25(5) doi: 10.3390/molecules25051122.1122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Nemati M., Shahosseini S. R., Ariaii P. Review of Fish Protein Hydrolysates: Production Methods, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity and Nanoencapsulation. Food Science and Biotechnology . 2024;33(8):1789–1803. doi: 10.1007/s10068-024-01554-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Chaklader M. R., Howieson J., Foysal M. J., Hanif M. A., Abdel-Latif H. M. R., Fotedar R. Fish Waste to Sustainable Additives: Fish Protein Hydrolysates Alleviate Intestinal Dysbiosis and Muscle Atrophy Induced by Poultry by-Product Meal in Lates calcarifer Juvenile. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2023;10 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1145068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Egerton S., Wan A., Murphy K., et al. Replacing Fishmeal With Plant Protein in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Diets by Supplementation With Fish Protein Hydrolysate. Scientific Reports . 2020;10(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60325-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Siddik M. A. B., Pham H. D., Francis D. S., Vo B. V., Shahjahan M. Dietary Supplementation of Fish Protein Hydrolysate in High Plant Protein Diets Modulates Growth, Liver and Kidney Health, and Immunity of Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2021;27(S1):86–98. doi: 10.1111/anu.13404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8.Wei Y., Wang J., Zhang X., et al. Fish Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation in Plant Protein Based Diets for Tiger Puffer (Takifugu rubripes) Is an Effective Strategy of Fish Meal Sparing. Aquaculture Reports . 2021;20 doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100720.100720 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
9.Aissaoui N., Chobert J.-M., Haertlé T., Marzouki M. N., Abidi F. Purification and Biochemical Characterization of a Neutral Serine Protease From Trichoderma harzianum. Use in Antibacterial Peptide Production From a Fish by-Product Hydrolysate. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology . 2017;182(2):831–845. doi: 10.1007/s12010-016-2365-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Offret C., Fliss I., Bazinet L., Marette A., Beaulieu L. Identification of a Novel Antibacterial Peptide From Atlantic Mackerel Belonging to the GAPDH-Related Antimicrobial Family and Its in Vitro Digestibility. Marine Drugs . 2019;17(7) doi: 10.3390/md17070413.413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Trang H. T. H., Pasuwan P. Screening Antimicrobial Activity Against Pathogens From Protein Hydrolysate of Rice Bran and Nile Tilapia by-Products. International Food Research Journal . 2018;25:2157–2163. [Google Scholar]
12.Abd Rashid N. Y., Manan M. A., Pa’ee K. F., Saari N., Faizal Wong F. W. Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Produced From Malaysian Fish Sausage (Keropok Lekor) by-Products by Indigenous Lactobacillus casei Fermentation. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2022;347 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131303.131303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13.Nguyen M. C., Fotedar R., Giridharan B. The Effects of Fish Protein Hydrolysate as Supplementation on Growth Performance, Feed Utilization and Immunological Response in Fish: A Review. MATEC Web of Conferences . 2023;37701020 [Google Scholar]
14.Chaklader M. R., Fotedar R., Howieson J., Siddik M. A. B., Foysal M. J. The Ameliorative Effects of Various Fish Protein Hydrolysates in Poultry by-Product Meal Based Diets on Muscle Quality, Serum Biochemistry and Immunity in Juvenile Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2020;104:567–578. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2020.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Pham H. D., Siddik M. A. B., Le H. M., Ngo M. V., Nguyen M. V., Francis D. Effects of Dietary Tuna Viscera Hydrolysate Supplementation on Growth, Intestinal Mucosal Response, and Resistance to Streptococcus iniae Infection in Pompano (Trachinotus blochii) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2022;2022:14. doi: 10.1155/2022/3645868.3645868 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16.Tejpal C. S., Vijayagopal P., Elavarasan K., et al. Evaluation of Pepsin Derived Tilapia Fish Waste Protein Hydrolysate as a Feed Ingredient for Silver Pompano (Trachinotus blochii) Fingerlings: Influence on Growth, Metabolism, Immune and Disease Resistance. Animal Feed Science and Technology . 2021;272 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114748.114748 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17.Franzenburg S., Walter J., Künzel S., et al. Distinct Antimicrobial Peptide Expression Determines Host Species-Specific Bacterial Associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 2013; pp. E3730–E3738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Masso-Silva J. A., Diamond G. Antimicrobial Peptides From Fish. Pharmaceuticals . 2014;7(3):265–310. doi: 10.3390/ph7030265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Wei Y., Liu J., Wang L., et al. Influence of Fish Protein Hydrolysate on Intestinal Health and Microbial Communities in Turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture . 2023;576 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739827.739827 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20.Villamil L., Figueras A., Aranguren R., Novoa B. Non-Specific Immune Response of Turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), Experimentally Infected With a Pathogenic Vibrio Pelagius. Journal of Fish Diseases . 2003;26(6):321–329. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Yuan Y., Zhang Y., Qi G., et al. Isolation, Identification, and Resistance Gene Detection of Vibrio harveyi From Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture International . 2021;29(5):2357–2368. doi: 10.1007/s10499-021-00752-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22.Olsson J. C., Jöborn A., Westerdah A., Blomberg L., Kjelleberg S., Conway P. L. Survival, Persistence and Proliferation of Vibrio anguillarum in Juvenile Turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), Intestine and Faeces. Journal of Fish Diseases . 1998;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1998.00327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Montes M., Farto R., Pérez M. D., Armada S. P., Nieto T. P. Genotypic Diversity of Vibrio Isolates Associated With Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) Culture. Research in Microbiology . 2006;157(5):487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Zheng K., Liang M., Yao H., Wang J., Chang Q. Effect of Dietary Fish Protein Hydrolysate on Growth, Feed Utilization and IGF-I Levels of Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2012;18(3):297–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00896.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25.Aqil F., Khan M. S. A., Owais M., Ahmad I. Effect of Certain Bioactive Plant Extracts on Clinical Isolates of β-Lactamase Producing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Basic Microbiology . 2005;45(2):106–114. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200410355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Raghupathi K. R., Koodali R. T., Manna A. C. Size-Dependent Bacterial Growth Inhibition and Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Langmuir . 2011;27(7):4020–4028. doi: 10.1021/la104825u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Bankier C., Cheong Y., Mahalingam S. A Comparison of Methods to Assess the Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoparticle Combinations on Bacterial Cells. PLoS One . 2018;13(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192093.e0192093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Fowler D., Hu J., Hou P., Wong C. The Effect of Sub-Inhibitory Streptomycin on Capsular Polysaccharide Production and Streptomycin Resistance in Escherichia coli. Journal of Experimental Microbiology and Immunology . 2009;13:47–52. [Google Scholar]
29.Bonaldo A., Parma L., Mandrioli L., et al. Increasing Dietary Plant Proteins Affects Growth Performance and Ammonia Excretion but Not Digestibility and Gut Histology in Turbot (Psetta maxima) Juveniles. Aquaculture . 2011;318(1-2):101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30.Gu M., Bai N., Zhang Y., Krogdahl Å. Soybean Meal Induces Enteritis in Turbot Scophthalmus maximus at High Supplementation Levels. Aquaculture . 2016;464:286–295. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.06.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31.Wei Y., Li B., Xu H., Liang M. Fish Protein Hydrolysate in Diets of Turbot Affects Muscle Fibre Morphometry, and the Expression of Muscle Growth-Related Genes. Aquaculture Nutrition . 2020;26(5):1780–1791. doi: 10.1111/anu.13129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32.Wei Y., Liang M., Xu H. Fish Protein Hydrolysate Affected Amino Acid Absorption and Related Gene Expressions of IGF-1/AKT Pathways in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2019;26(1):145–155. doi: 10.1111/anu.12976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
33.AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis . 18th edition. Maryland, USA: 2005. Association of Official Analytical, Chemists International. [Google Scholar]
34.Wang L., Liu J., Li Y., et al. Response of Turbot Scophthalmus maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) to Imbalanced Branched-Chain Amino Acids in Diets. Fishes . 2023;8(11) doi: 10.3390/fishes8110534.534 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
35.Sun K. Identification and Application of a Novel Genetic Marker of Vibrio haryevi . Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2005. Ph.D. Thesis. [Google Scholar]
36.Caipang C. M. A., Jr, Pakingking R. V., Apines-Amar M. J. S., Huyop F., Bautista N. B. Development of a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay Targeted to the dnaJ Gene of Vibrio harveyi, a Bacterial Pathogen in Asian Seabass, Lates calcarifer. AACL Bioflux . 2011;4:447–454. [Google Scholar]
37.Lai X., Wu H., Guo W., et al. Vibrio harveyi Co-Infected With Cryptocaryon irritans to Orange-Spotted Groupers Epinephelus coioides. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2023;139 doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2023.108879.108879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Wang W., Zhang J., Shao R., et al. Sodium Acetate Alleviates Adverse Effects Caused by the Diet With High Proportion of Soybean Meal in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) Aquaculture . 2023;566 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.739163.739163 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
39.Sun H., Zhang J., Wang W., et al. The Effects of Sodium Propionate Supplementation in the Diet With High Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Intestinal Health, and Immune Resistance to Bacterial Infection in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2022;2022:13. doi: 10.1155/2022/8952755.8952755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Krogdahl Å., Bakke-McKellep A. M., Baeverfjord G. Effects of Graded Levels of Standard Soybean Meal on Intestinal Structure, Mucosal Enzyme Activities, and Pancreatic Response in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2003;9(6):361–371. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00264.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41.Nordrum S., Bakke-McKellep A. M., Krogdahl Å., Buddington R. K. Effects of Soybean Meal and Salinity on Intestinal Transport of Nutrients in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) and Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology . 2000;125(3):317–335. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0491(99)00190-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Urán P. A., Gonçalves A. A., Taverne-Thiele J. J., Schrama J. W., Verreth J. A. J., Rombout J. H. W. M. Soybean Meal Induces Intestinal Inflammation in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2008;25(6):751–760. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Yu G., Yu H., Yang Q., et al. Vibrio harveyi Infections Induce Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Murine Peritoneal Macrophages via Activation of p38 MAPK and NF-κB Pathways, but Reversed by PI3K/AKT Pathways. Developmental and Comparative Immunology . 2022;127 doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2021.104292.104292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Zhou Z., Wang L., Dai M., et al. Three Types of Enteromorpha prolifera Bio-Products Based on Different Processing Procedures as Feed Additives in the Diets of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Fishes . 2023;8(12):p. 587. doi: 10.3390/fishes8120587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
45.Kiron V. Fish Immune System and Its Nutritional Modulation for Preventive Health Care. Animal Feed Science and Technology . 2012;173(1-2):111–133. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
46.Abdel-Tawwab M., Eissa E. S. H., Tawfik W. A., et al. Dietary Curcumin Nanoparticles Promoted the Performance, Antioxidant Activity, and Humoral Immunity, and Modulated the Hepatic and Intestinal Histology of Nile Tilapia Fingerlings. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry . 2022;48(3):585–601. doi: 10.1007/s10695-022-01066-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Yonar S. M. Growth Performance, Haematological Changes, Immune Response, Antioxidant Activity and Disease Resistance in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fed Diet Supplemented With Ellagic Acid. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2019;95:391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Siddik M. A. B., Howieson J., Fotedar R., Partridge G. J. Enzymatic Fish Protein Hydrolysates in Finfish Aquaculture: A Review. Reviews in Aquaculture . 2021;13(1):406–430. doi: 10.1111/raq.12481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
49.Siddik M. A. B., Howieson J., Partridge G. J., Fotedar R., Gholipourkanani H. Dietary Tuna Hydrolysate Modulates Growth Performance, Immune Response, Intestinal Morphology and Resistance to Streptococcus iniae in Juvenile Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Scientific Reports . 2018;8(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34182-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Liang M., Wang J., Chang Q., Mai K. Effects of Different Levels of Fish Protein Hydrolysate in the Diet on the Nonspecific Immunity of Japanese Sea Bass, Lateolabrax japonicus (Cuvieret Valenciennes, 1828) Aquaculture Research . 2006;37(1):102–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01392.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
51.Gunathilaka B. E., Khosravi S., Herault M., et al. Evaluation of Shrimp or Tilapia Protein Hydrolysate at Graded Dosages in Low Fish Meal Diet for Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2020;26(5):1592–1603. doi: 10.1111/anu.13105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
52.Tang H.-G., Wu T.-X., Zhao Z.-Y., Pan X.-D. Effects of Fish Protein Hydrolysate on Growth Performance and Humoral Immune Response in Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea R.) Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B . 2008;9(9):684–690. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Khosravi S., Rahimnejad S., Herault M., et al. Effects of Protein Hydrolysates Supplementation in Low Fish Meal Diets on Growth Performance, Innate Immunity and Disease Resistance of Red Sea Bream Pagrus major. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2015;45(2):858–868. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Arnhold J. The Dual Role of Myeloperoxidase in Immune Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2020;21(21) doi: 10.3390/ijms21218057.8057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Knoop K. A., Newberry R. D. Goblet Cells: Multifaceted Players in Immunity at Mucosal Surfaces. Mucosal Immunology . 2018;11(6):1551–1557. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0039-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Fan Z., Wu D., Li J., et al. Assessment of Fish Protein Hydrolysates in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Diets: Effect on Growth, Intestinal Antioxidant Status, Immunity, and Microflora. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2022;9 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.816341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Siddik M. A. B., Chaklader M. R., Foysal M. J., Howieson J., Fotedar R., Gupta S. K. Influence of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Produced From Industrial Residues on Antioxidant Activity, Cytokine Expression and Gut Microbial Communities in Juvenile Barramundi Lates calcarifer. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2020;97:465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.12.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Bi J., Tian C., Jiang J., Zhang G.-L., Hao H., Hou H.-M. Antibacterial Activity and Potential Application in Food Packaging of Peptides Derived From Turbot Viscera Hydrolysate. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2020;68(37):9968–9977. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Baco N., Oslan S. N. H., Shapawi R., Mohhtar R. A. M., Noordin W. N. M., Huda N. Antibacterial Activity of Functional Bioactive Peptides Derived From Fish Protein Hydrolysate. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science . 2022;967012019 [Google Scholar]
60.Wald M., Schwarz K., Rehbein H., Bußmann B., Beermann C. Detection of Antibacterial Activity of an Enzymatic Hydrolysate Generated by Processing Rainbow Trout by-Products With Trout Pepsin. Food Chemistry . 2016;205:221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Ediriweera T. K., Aruppala A. L. Y. H., Abeyrathne E. D. N. S. Analysis of Bioactive Properties of Fish Protein Hydrolysates From Scomber japonicus Fin Wastes. International Food Research Journal . 2019;1:31–45. [Google Scholar]
62.Kabir M. A., Nandi S. K., Suma A. Y., et al. The Potential of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation in Nile Tilapia Diets: Effects on Growth and Health Performance, Disease Resistance, and Farm Economic Analysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology . 2024;196(10):7145–7167. doi: 10.1007/s12010-024-04913-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Suma A. Y., Nandi S. K., Kari Z. A., et al. Beneficial Effects of Graded Levels of Fish Protein Hydrolysate (FPH) on the Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Liver and Intestinal Health, Economics Efficiency, and Disease Resistance to, Beneficial Effects of Graded Levels of Fish Protein Hydrolysate (FPH) on the Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Intestinal Health, Economics Efficiency, and Disease Resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila of Pabda (Ompok pabda) Fingerling. Fishes . 2023;8147 [Google Scholar]
64.Siddik M. A. B., Howieson J., Fotedar R. Beneficial Effects of Tuna Hydrolysate in Poultry by-Product Meal Diets on Growth, Immune Response, Intestinal Health and Disease Resistance to Vibrio harveyi in Juvenile Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2019;89:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Wang A. R., Ran C., Ringø E., Zhou Z. G. Progress in Fish Gastrointestinal Microbiota Research. Reviews in Aquaculture . 2018;10(3):626–640. doi: 10.1111/raq.12191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
66.Dehler C. E., Secombes C. J., Martin S. A. M. Environmental and Physiological Factors Shape the Gut Microbiota of Atlantic Salmon Parr (Salmo salar L.) Aquaculture . 2017;467:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Bui H. T. D., Khosravi S., Fournier V., Herault M., Lee K. J. Growth Performance, Feed Utilization, Innate Immunity, Digestibility and Disease Resistance of Juvenile Red Seabream (Pagrus major) Fed Diets Supplemented With Protein Hydrolysates. Aquaculture . 2014;418-419:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
68.Wei Y., Wang L., Li Y., Ma Q., Liang M., Xu H. Exploring Antibacterial Activity of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Invitro Against Vibrio Strains and Disease Resistance to V. harveyi Inturbot (Scophthalmus maximus) 2024. http://csfish.org.cn/upFilesCenter/upload/file/20241114/1731573560716022451.pdf . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information 1

3446155.f1.docx^{(17KB, docx)}

Supporting Information 2

3446155.f2.docx^{(533.4KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

The datasets of microbial communities have been submitted to online repositories (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA1111883). Other data can be made available on request.

[B1] 1.Hublin A., Malbaša H., Stanec Svedrović D., Jerman Vranić M. Using Life Cycle Assessment to Achieve a Circular Economy of Fish Waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization . 2024;15(7):4487–4499. doi: 10.1007/s12649-024-02474-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B2] 2.Naghdi S., Rezaei M., Heidari M. G., Tahergorabi R., Lorenzo J. M., Mirzaei F. Insights Into Fishery by-Product Application in Aquatic Feed and Food: A Review. Aquaculture International . 2024;32(5):5851–5910. doi: 10.1007/s10499-024-01447-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B3] 3.Madende M., Hayes M. Fish by-Product Use as Biostimulants: An Overview of the Current State of the Art, Including Relevant Legislation and Regulations Within the EU and USA. Molecules . 2020;25(5) doi: 10.3390/molecules25051122.1122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B4] 4.Nemati M., Shahosseini S. R., Ariaii P. Review of Fish Protein Hydrolysates: Production Methods, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity and Nanoencapsulation. Food Science and Biotechnology . 2024;33(8):1789–1803. doi: 10.1007/s10068-024-01554-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B5] 5.Chaklader M. R., Howieson J., Foysal M. J., Hanif M. A., Abdel-Latif H. M. R., Fotedar R. Fish Waste to Sustainable Additives: Fish Protein Hydrolysates Alleviate Intestinal Dysbiosis and Muscle Atrophy Induced by Poultry by-Product Meal in Lates calcarifer Juvenile. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2023;10 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1145068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B6] 6.Egerton S., Wan A., Murphy K., et al. Replacing Fishmeal With Plant Protein in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Diets by Supplementation With Fish Protein Hydrolysate. Scientific Reports . 2020;10(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60325-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B7] 7.Siddik M. A. B., Pham H. D., Francis D. S., Vo B. V., Shahjahan M. Dietary Supplementation of Fish Protein Hydrolysate in High Plant Protein Diets Modulates Growth, Liver and Kidney Health, and Immunity of Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2021;27(S1):86–98. doi: 10.1111/anu.13404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B8] 8.Wei Y., Wang J., Zhang X., et al. Fish Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation in Plant Protein Based Diets for Tiger Puffer (Takifugu rubripes) Is an Effective Strategy of Fish Meal Sparing. Aquaculture Reports . 2021;20 doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100720.100720 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B9] 9.Aissaoui N., Chobert J.-M., Haertlé T., Marzouki M. N., Abidi F. Purification and Biochemical Characterization of a Neutral Serine Protease From Trichoderma harzianum. Use in Antibacterial Peptide Production From a Fish by-Product Hydrolysate. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology . 2017;182(2):831–845. doi: 10.1007/s12010-016-2365-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B10] 10.Offret C., Fliss I., Bazinet L., Marette A., Beaulieu L. Identification of a Novel Antibacterial Peptide From Atlantic Mackerel Belonging to the GAPDH-Related Antimicrobial Family and Its in Vitro Digestibility. Marine Drugs . 2019;17(7) doi: 10.3390/md17070413.413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B11] 11.Trang H. T. H., Pasuwan P. Screening Antimicrobial Activity Against Pathogens From Protein Hydrolysate of Rice Bran and Nile Tilapia by-Products. International Food Research Journal . 2018;25:2157–2163. [Google Scholar]

[B12] 12.Abd Rashid N. Y., Manan M. A., Pa’ee K. F., Saari N., Faizal Wong F. W. Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Produced From Malaysian Fish Sausage (Keropok Lekor) by-Products by Indigenous Lactobacillus casei Fermentation. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2022;347 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131303.131303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B13] 13.Nguyen M. C., Fotedar R., Giridharan B. The Effects of Fish Protein Hydrolysate as Supplementation on Growth Performance, Feed Utilization and Immunological Response in Fish: A Review. MATEC Web of Conferences . 2023;37701020 [Google Scholar]

[B14] 14.Chaklader M. R., Fotedar R., Howieson J., Siddik M. A. B., Foysal M. J. The Ameliorative Effects of Various Fish Protein Hydrolysates in Poultry by-Product Meal Based Diets on Muscle Quality, Serum Biochemistry and Immunity in Juvenile Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2020;104:567–578. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2020.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B15] 15.Pham H. D., Siddik M. A. B., Le H. M., Ngo M. V., Nguyen M. V., Francis D. Effects of Dietary Tuna Viscera Hydrolysate Supplementation on Growth, Intestinal Mucosal Response, and Resistance to Streptococcus iniae Infection in Pompano (Trachinotus blochii) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2022;2022:14. doi: 10.1155/2022/3645868.3645868 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B16] 16.Tejpal C. S., Vijayagopal P., Elavarasan K., et al. Evaluation of Pepsin Derived Tilapia Fish Waste Protein Hydrolysate as a Feed Ingredient for Silver Pompano (Trachinotus blochii) Fingerlings: Influence on Growth, Metabolism, Immune and Disease Resistance. Animal Feed Science and Technology . 2021;272 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114748.114748 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B17] 17.Franzenburg S., Walter J., Künzel S., et al. Distinct Antimicrobial Peptide Expression Determines Host Species-Specific Bacterial Associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 2013; pp. E3730–E3738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B18] 18.Masso-Silva J. A., Diamond G. Antimicrobial Peptides From Fish. Pharmaceuticals . 2014;7(3):265–310. doi: 10.3390/ph7030265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B19] 19.Wei Y., Liu J., Wang L., et al. Influence of Fish Protein Hydrolysate on Intestinal Health and Microbial Communities in Turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture . 2023;576 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739827.739827 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B20] 20.Villamil L., Figueras A., Aranguren R., Novoa B. Non-Specific Immune Response of Turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), Experimentally Infected With a Pathogenic Vibrio Pelagius. Journal of Fish Diseases . 2003;26(6):321–329. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B21] 21.Yuan Y., Zhang Y., Qi G., et al. Isolation, Identification, and Resistance Gene Detection of Vibrio harveyi From Scophthalmus maximus. Aquaculture International . 2021;29(5):2357–2368. doi: 10.1007/s10499-021-00752-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B22] 22.Olsson J. C., Jöborn A., Westerdah A., Blomberg L., Kjelleberg S., Conway P. L. Survival, Persistence and Proliferation of Vibrio anguillarum in Juvenile Turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), Intestine and Faeces. Journal of Fish Diseases . 1998;21(1):1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1998.00327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B23] 23.Montes M., Farto R., Pérez M. D., Armada S. P., Nieto T. P. Genotypic Diversity of Vibrio Isolates Associated With Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) Culture. Research in Microbiology . 2006;157(5):487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B24] 24.Zheng K., Liang M., Yao H., Wang J., Chang Q. Effect of Dietary Fish Protein Hydrolysate on Growth, Feed Utilization and IGF-I Levels of Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2012;18(3):297–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00896.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B25] 25.Aqil F., Khan M. S. A., Owais M., Ahmad I. Effect of Certain Bioactive Plant Extracts on Clinical Isolates of β-Lactamase Producing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Basic Microbiology . 2005;45(2):106–114. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200410355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B26] 26.Raghupathi K. R., Koodali R. T., Manna A. C. Size-Dependent Bacterial Growth Inhibition and Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Langmuir . 2011;27(7):4020–4028. doi: 10.1021/la104825u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B27] 27.Bankier C., Cheong Y., Mahalingam S. A Comparison of Methods to Assess the Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoparticle Combinations on Bacterial Cells. PLoS One . 2018;13(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192093.e0192093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B28] 28.Fowler D., Hu J., Hou P., Wong C. The Effect of Sub-Inhibitory Streptomycin on Capsular Polysaccharide Production and Streptomycin Resistance in Escherichia coli. Journal of Experimental Microbiology and Immunology . 2009;13:47–52. [Google Scholar]

[B29] 29.Bonaldo A., Parma L., Mandrioli L., et al. Increasing Dietary Plant Proteins Affects Growth Performance and Ammonia Excretion but Not Digestibility and Gut Histology in Turbot (Psetta maxima) Juveniles. Aquaculture . 2011;318(1-2):101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B30] 30.Gu M., Bai N., Zhang Y., Krogdahl Å. Soybean Meal Induces Enteritis in Turbot Scophthalmus maximus at High Supplementation Levels. Aquaculture . 2016;464:286–295. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.06.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B31] 31.Wei Y., Li B., Xu H., Liang M. Fish Protein Hydrolysate in Diets of Turbot Affects Muscle Fibre Morphometry, and the Expression of Muscle Growth-Related Genes. Aquaculture Nutrition . 2020;26(5):1780–1791. doi: 10.1111/anu.13129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B32] 32.Wei Y., Liang M., Xu H. Fish Protein Hydrolysate Affected Amino Acid Absorption and Related Gene Expressions of IGF-1/AKT Pathways in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2019;26(1):145–155. doi: 10.1111/anu.12976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B33] 33.AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis . 18th edition. Maryland, USA: 2005. Association of Official Analytical, Chemists International. [Google Scholar]

[B34] 34.Wang L., Liu J., Li Y., et al. Response of Turbot Scophthalmus maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) to Imbalanced Branched-Chain Amino Acids in Diets. Fishes . 2023;8(11) doi: 10.3390/fishes8110534.534 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B35] 35.Sun K. Identification and Application of a Novel Genetic Marker of Vibrio haryevi . Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2005. Ph.D. Thesis. [Google Scholar]

[B36] 36.Caipang C. M. A., Jr, Pakingking R. V., Apines-Amar M. J. S., Huyop F., Bautista N. B. Development of a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay Targeted to the dnaJ Gene of Vibrio harveyi, a Bacterial Pathogen in Asian Seabass, Lates calcarifer. AACL Bioflux . 2011;4:447–454. [Google Scholar]

[B37] 37.Lai X., Wu H., Guo W., et al. Vibrio harveyi Co-Infected With Cryptocaryon irritans to Orange-Spotted Groupers Epinephelus coioides. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2023;139 doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2023.108879.108879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B38] 38.Wang W., Zhang J., Shao R., et al. Sodium Acetate Alleviates Adverse Effects Caused by the Diet With High Proportion of Soybean Meal in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) Aquaculture . 2023;566 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.739163.739163 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B39] 39.Sun H., Zhang J., Wang W., et al. The Effects of Sodium Propionate Supplementation in the Diet With High Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Intestinal Health, and Immune Resistance to Bacterial Infection in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2022;2022:13. doi: 10.1155/2022/8952755.8952755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B40] 40.Krogdahl Å., Bakke-McKellep A. M., Baeverfjord G. Effects of Graded Levels of Standard Soybean Meal on Intestinal Structure, Mucosal Enzyme Activities, and Pancreatic Response in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2003;9(6):361–371. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2095.2003.00264.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B41] 41.Nordrum S., Bakke-McKellep A. M., Krogdahl Å., Buddington R. K. Effects of Soybean Meal and Salinity on Intestinal Transport of Nutrients in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) and Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology . 2000;125(3):317–335. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0491(99)00190-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B42] 42.Urán P. A., Gonçalves A. A., Taverne-Thiele J. J., Schrama J. W., Verreth J. A. J., Rombout J. H. W. M. Soybean Meal Induces Intestinal Inflammation in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2008;25(6):751–760. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B43] 43.Yu G., Yu H., Yang Q., et al. Vibrio harveyi Infections Induce Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Murine Peritoneal Macrophages via Activation of p38 MAPK and NF-κB Pathways, but Reversed by PI3K/AKT Pathways. Developmental and Comparative Immunology . 2022;127 doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2021.104292.104292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B44] 44.Zhou Z., Wang L., Dai M., et al. Three Types of Enteromorpha prolifera Bio-Products Based on Different Processing Procedures as Feed Additives in the Diets of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Fishes . 2023;8(12):p. 587. doi: 10.3390/fishes8120587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B45] 45.Kiron V. Fish Immune System and Its Nutritional Modulation for Preventive Health Care. Animal Feed Science and Technology . 2012;173(1-2):111–133. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B46] 46.Abdel-Tawwab M., Eissa E. S. H., Tawfik W. A., et al. Dietary Curcumin Nanoparticles Promoted the Performance, Antioxidant Activity, and Humoral Immunity, and Modulated the Hepatic and Intestinal Histology of Nile Tilapia Fingerlings. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry . 2022;48(3):585–601. doi: 10.1007/s10695-022-01066-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B47] 47.Yonar S. M. Growth Performance, Haematological Changes, Immune Response, Antioxidant Activity and Disease Resistance in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fed Diet Supplemented With Ellagic Acid. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2019;95:391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B48] 48.Siddik M. A. B., Howieson J., Fotedar R., Partridge G. J. Enzymatic Fish Protein Hydrolysates in Finfish Aquaculture: A Review. Reviews in Aquaculture . 2021;13(1):406–430. doi: 10.1111/raq.12481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B49] 49.Siddik M. A. B., Howieson J., Partridge G. J., Fotedar R., Gholipourkanani H. Dietary Tuna Hydrolysate Modulates Growth Performance, Immune Response, Intestinal Morphology and Resistance to Streptococcus iniae in Juvenile Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Scientific Reports . 2018;8(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34182-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B50] 50.Liang M., Wang J., Chang Q., Mai K. Effects of Different Levels of Fish Protein Hydrolysate in the Diet on the Nonspecific Immunity of Japanese Sea Bass, Lateolabrax japonicus (Cuvieret Valenciennes, 1828) Aquaculture Research . 2006;37(1):102–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01392.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B51] 51.Gunathilaka B. E., Khosravi S., Herault M., et al. Evaluation of Shrimp or Tilapia Protein Hydrolysate at Graded Dosages in Low Fish Meal Diet for Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Aquaculture Nutrition . 2020;26(5):1592–1603. doi: 10.1111/anu.13105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B52] 52.Tang H.-G., Wu T.-X., Zhao Z.-Y., Pan X.-D. Effects of Fish Protein Hydrolysate on Growth Performance and Humoral Immune Response in Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea R.) Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B . 2008;9(9):684–690. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B53] 53.Khosravi S., Rahimnejad S., Herault M., et al. Effects of Protein Hydrolysates Supplementation in Low Fish Meal Diets on Growth Performance, Innate Immunity and Disease Resistance of Red Sea Bream Pagrus major. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2015;45(2):858–868. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B54] 54.Arnhold J. The Dual Role of Myeloperoxidase in Immune Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2020;21(21) doi: 10.3390/ijms21218057.8057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B55] 55.Knoop K. A., Newberry R. D. Goblet Cells: Multifaceted Players in Immunity at Mucosal Surfaces. Mucosal Immunology . 2018;11(6):1551–1557. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0039-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B56] 56.Fan Z., Wu D., Li J., et al. Assessment of Fish Protein Hydrolysates in Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Diets: Effect on Growth, Intestinal Antioxidant Status, Immunity, and Microflora. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2022;9 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.816341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B57] 57.Siddik M. A. B., Chaklader M. R., Foysal M. J., Howieson J., Fotedar R., Gupta S. K. Influence of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Produced From Industrial Residues on Antioxidant Activity, Cytokine Expression and Gut Microbial Communities in Juvenile Barramundi Lates calcarifer. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2020;97:465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.12.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B58] 58.Bi J., Tian C., Jiang J., Zhang G.-L., Hao H., Hou H.-M. Antibacterial Activity and Potential Application in Food Packaging of Peptides Derived From Turbot Viscera Hydrolysate. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2020;68(37):9968–9977. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B59] 59.Baco N., Oslan S. N. H., Shapawi R., Mohhtar R. A. M., Noordin W. N. M., Huda N. Antibacterial Activity of Functional Bioactive Peptides Derived From Fish Protein Hydrolysate. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science . 2022;967012019 [Google Scholar]

[B60] 60.Wald M., Schwarz K., Rehbein H., Bußmann B., Beermann C. Detection of Antibacterial Activity of an Enzymatic Hydrolysate Generated by Processing Rainbow Trout by-Products With Trout Pepsin. Food Chemistry . 2016;205:221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B61] 61.Ediriweera T. K., Aruppala A. L. Y. H., Abeyrathne E. D. N. S. Analysis of Bioactive Properties of Fish Protein Hydrolysates From Scomber japonicus Fin Wastes. International Food Research Journal . 2019;1:31–45. [Google Scholar]

[B62] 62.Kabir M. A., Nandi S. K., Suma A. Y., et al. The Potential of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation in Nile Tilapia Diets: Effects on Growth and Health Performance, Disease Resistance, and Farm Economic Analysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology . 2024;196(10):7145–7167. doi: 10.1007/s12010-024-04913-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B63] 63.Suma A. Y., Nandi S. K., Kari Z. A., et al. Beneficial Effects of Graded Levels of Fish Protein Hydrolysate (FPH) on the Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Liver and Intestinal Health, Economics Efficiency, and Disease Resistance to, Beneficial Effects of Graded Levels of Fish Protein Hydrolysate (FPH) on the Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Intestinal Health, Economics Efficiency, and Disease Resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila of Pabda (Ompok pabda) Fingerling. Fishes . 2023;8147 [Google Scholar]

[B64] 64.Siddik M. A. B., Howieson J., Fotedar R. Beneficial Effects of Tuna Hydrolysate in Poultry by-Product Meal Diets on Growth, Immune Response, Intestinal Health and Disease Resistance to Vibrio harveyi in Juvenile Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2019;89:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B65] 65.Wang A. R., Ran C., Ringø E., Zhou Z. G. Progress in Fish Gastrointestinal Microbiota Research. Reviews in Aquaculture . 2018;10(3):626–640. doi: 10.1111/raq.12191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B66] 66.Dehler C. E., Secombes C. J., Martin S. A. M. Environmental and Physiological Factors Shape the Gut Microbiota of Atlantic Salmon Parr (Salmo salar L.) Aquaculture . 2017;467:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B67] 67.Bui H. T. D., Khosravi S., Fournier V., Herault M., Lee K. J. Growth Performance, Feed Utilization, Innate Immunity, Digestibility and Disease Resistance of Juvenile Red Seabream (Pagrus major) Fed Diets Supplemented With Protein Hydrolysates. Aquaculture . 2014;418-419:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B68] 68.Wei Y., Wang L., Li Y., Ma Q., Liang M., Xu H. Exploring Antibacterial Activity of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Invitro Against Vibrio Strains and Disease Resistance to V. harveyi Inturbot (Scophthalmus maximus) 2024. http://csfish.org.cn/upFilesCenter/upload/file/20241114/1731573560716022451.pdf . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

PERMALINK

Exploring Antibacterial Activity of Fish Protein Hydrolysate In Vitro Against Vibrio Strains and Disease Resistance to V. harveyi in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Yuliang Wei

Lu Wang

Yanlu Li

Qiang Ma

Mengqing Liang

Houguo Xu

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antibacterial Activity of FPH

2.1.1. Production of FPH

2.1.2. Preparation of Microbiological Culture Medias With FPH

Table 1.

2.1.3. Bacteria and Antibacterial Assays

2.2. Experimental Diets, Experimental Fish, and Feeding Trial

Table 2.

2.3. Sample Collection

2.4. V. harveyi Challenge

2.5. Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant, and Immunological Parameters

2.6. Gene Expression Analyses

Table 3.

2.7. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing

2.8. Intestinal Morphology

2.9. The qRT-PCR Assay in Detecting V. harveyi of Middle and Distal Intestine After the Challenge

2.10. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Antibacterial Activity of FPH

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Table 4.

3.2. The Growth and Feed Utilization

Table 5.

3.3. Histology of Middle and Distal Intestine

Table 6.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

3.4. Serum Biochemical, Antioxidant, and Immunological Parameters

Table 7.

3.5. The Gene Expression of Immune-Related Inflammatory Cytokines

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

3.6. Survival Analysis and Relative Concentration of V. harveyi in the Intestine

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Table 8.

3.7. Microbiota of the Distal Intestine

Table 9.

Figure 9.

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Data Availability Statement

Ethics Statement

Conflicts of Interest

Author Contributions

Funding

Supporting Information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases