Skip to main content
Molecular Biology of the Cell logoLink to Molecular Biology of the Cell
. 2025 Aug 12;36(9):ar111. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E25-02-0057

Lamin B1 and LAP2β resist cytoskeletal force to maintain lamin A/C meshwork organization and preserve nuclear integrity

Yewande Alabi a, Vasilisa Aksenova b, Alexei Arnaoutov b, Harold Marin a, Mary Dasso b, Abigail Buchwalter a,c,*
Editor: Richard Wozniakd
PMCID: PMC12415607  PMID: 40668606

Abstract

The nuclear lamins are extremely long-lived proteins in most cell types. As a consequence, lamin function cannot be effectively dissected with temporal precision using standard knockdown approaches. Here, we apply the auxin-inducible degron system to rapidly deplete each lamin isoform within one cell cycle and reveal the immediate impacts of lamin loss on the nucleus. Surprisingly, neither acute lamin A/C (LA/C), lamin B1 (LB1), nor lamin B2 (LB2) depletion altered nuclear shape or induced nuclear blebbing, indicating that acute lamin loss is not sufficient to alter nuclear morphology. LB1 depletion is immediately followed by LA/C meshwork disorganization due to actin cytoskeletal forces on the lamina, yet neither LA/C nor LB1 depletion induced nuclear rupturing. We found that the abundant inner nuclear membrane protein LAP2β protects nuclear integrity in the absence of LB1, as depletion of both LB1 and LAP2β induced severe LA/C disorganization and nuclear rupturing. Depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton prevents nuclear rupture in LAP2β- and LB1-depleted nuclei. We conclude that both LB1 and LAP2β resist cytoskeletal force to maintain regular LA/C meshwork organization and preserve nuclear integrity.


  • Auxin-inducible degrons can deplete the long-lived nuclear lamin proteins to undetectable levels in less than one cell cycle with minimal effects on nuclear shape or gene expression.

  • Acute depletion of LB1 induces lamin A meshwork gaps without nuclear rupture, while codepletion of LB1 and the inner nuclear membrane protein LAP2β; enlarges lamin A meshwork gaps and induces nuclear rupture; actin cytoskeletal force drives both lamin A meshwork gaps and nuclear rupture.

  • This work highlights the interdependent functions of lamins, lamin-associated nuclear membrane proteins, and the actin cytoskeleton in lamina meshwork maintenance and nuclear integrity.

INTRODUCTION

The nuclear lamina (NL) is a filamentous protein meshwork at the nuclear periphery that underlies the inner nuclear membrane (INM). In mammals, two types of lamin proteins make up the NL: A-type lamins, consisting of lamin A and its splice isoform lamin C (LA/C, encoded by the LMNA gene), and B-type lamins, consisting of lamin B1 and lamin B2 (LB1 and LB2, encoded by LMNB1 and LMNB2, respectively). Insights from mouse and human genetics imply unique functions for each of the mammalian lamin isoforms. LA/C knockout (KO) mice die shortly after birth with severe cardiomyopathy (Kubben et al., 2011), and mutations to the human LMNA gene cause dilated cardiomyopathy, muscular dystrophy, lipodystrophy, progeria, and other syndromes (Schreiber and Kennedy, 2013). Both LB1 and LB2 KO mice die shortly after birth due to severe neurodevelopmental defects (Coffinier et al., 2010; 2011). However, neither LB1 nor LB2 can rescue the KO of the other (Lee et al., 2014), suggesting that B-type lamins have distinct roles.

Much of what we have learned about lamin function has come from KO or RNA-mediated knockdown (KD) approaches. However, the lamins are long-lived proteins, especially in nondividing cells (Hasper et al., 2023). Therefore, any acute KO or KD approaches will have a long latency period, over multiple cell cycles, before an effect on lamin abundance will become apparent. As a result, it has not been possible to disrupt lamin function with temporal precision to reveal the immediate and direct impacts of lamin loss on nuclear function.

The lamins have been implicated in the regulation of gene expression and chromatin organization. Lamina-associated domains (LAD) of heterochromatin are enriched underneath the NL by interactions with the lamins and/or with lamin-associated proteins (Steensel and Belmont, 2017). LADs are transcriptionally repressive (Reddy et al., 2008; Leemans et al., 2019) and silence lineage-irrelevant genes during differentiation (Poleshko et al., 2017; Shah et al., 2021). In a role separate from LADs, a nucleoplasmic pool of LA/C can bind to active enhancers and promoters and is associated with active transcription (Gesson et al., 2016; Ikegami et al., 2020).

As the cell's largest and most rigid organelle, the nucleus is constantly subjected to force (Miroshnikova and Wickström, 2021). The NL protects the nucleus from external force, and loss of lamin isoforms is associated with nuclear morphology defects. For instance, LA/C loss has been linked to decreased nuclear circularity and increased nuclear deformability (Sullivan et al., 1999; Broers et al., 2004; Lammerding et al., 2006), while LB1 loss has been linked to nuclear blebbing (Lammerding et al., 2006; Nmezi et al., 2019). The inability of the nucleus to withstand force leads to nuclear envelope (NE) rupture, which mixes nuclear and cytoplasmic contents and induces DNA damage (Maciejowski and Hatch, 2020). Both LA/C and LB1 have been implicated in preserving nuclear integrity (Vos et al., 2011; Vargas et al., 2012; Robijns et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2018; Earle et al., 2019). Lamin-associated INM proteins, including LAP2β and lamin B receptor (LBR), have also been linked to regulation of nuclear integrity (Maciejowski et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2021; Baird et al., 2023).

Here, we leverage the auxin-inducible degron (AID) system(Nishimura et al., 2009; Morawska and Ulrich, 2013) to better understand the acute consequences of lamin loss of function. We demonstrate that we can rapidly deplete LA/C, LB1, and LB2 to undetectable levels within one cell cycle. Acute depletion of each lamin isoform has minor effects on gene expression and does not immediately induce changes to nuclear morphology. However, we show that LB1 depletion coincides with the opening of gaps in the LA/C meshwork and demonstrate that this effect depends on the actin cytoskeleton. Surprisingly, however, neither LA/C nor LB1-depleted cells undergo nuclear rupture. Instead, we determine that the highly expressed INM protein LAP2β and LB1 each organize the NL and prevent nuclear rupture.

RESULTS

Validation of AIDs for acute lamin depletion

To query the immediate impact of lamin depletion on nuclear function, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to biallelically insert an mNeonGreen (mNG) fluorescent protein and an AID tag (microAID; Morawska and Ulrich, 2013) immediately after the start codon of the LMNA, LMNB1, or LMNB2 loci in the human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line DLD1 (Figure 1B). To express the Tir1 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination of AID-tagged proteins in the presence of the plant hormone auxin, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to insert the sequence encoding OsTir1 into the 3′ end of the ubiquitously expressed RCC1 gene, separated from the RCC1 coding sequence by a cleavable P2A sequence (Aksenova et al., 2020). We confirmed the success of these edits by genotyping (Supplemental Figure S1, A–C) and by Western blotting (Figure 1, C–E), which indicates the expected molecular weight shifts corresponding to tag insertion. Tagging each lamin isoform moderately decreased both transcript and protein abundance (Supplemental Figure S3C; Figure 1, C–E), implying transcriptional and posttranscriptional effects on the lamin proteins due to editing of their genomic loci and/or leaky degradation. Nevertheless, each tagged lamin isoform localizes normally to the nuclear periphery in the absence of auxin (Figure 2A). The addition of auxin to the cell culture medium reduced each lamin isoform to undetectable levels within 16 h, or less than one cell cycle (Figure 1, C–E). Auxin-mediated degradation is thus an effective way to rapidly deplete and probe the functions of these long-lived nuclear proteins.

FIGURE 1:

FIGURE 1:

Auxin-inducible degradation of lamin A/C, LB1, and LB2 in DLD1 cells. (A) Relative expression levels of LMNA, LMNB1, and LMNB2 genes in DLD1 cells. (B) Schematic of two-component auxin-inducible degron system, consisting of (i) N-terminal bi-allelic insertion of an mNeonGreen fluorescent protein and a microAID tag into the LMNA, LMNB1, or LMNB2 loci; and (ii) stable expression of the OsTir1 ligase into the RCC1 locus. (C–E) Immunoblots showing degradation of LA/C (C), LB1 (D), and LB2 (E) compared with untagged DLD1 parental cell line after 16 h of auxin treatment. (F) Quantification of nuclear envelope protein abundance by LC-MS/MS in nuclear extracts from mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells treated with auxin for 16 h. (G) Number of genes significantly differentially expressed (padj < 0.05) at least 2-fold in mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells after 16 or 96 h of auxin treatment compared with untreated mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells.

FIGURE 2:

FIGURE 2:

Acute lamin depletion does not drive changes in nuclear morphology. (A–C) Immunofluorescence of mNeonGreen after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LA/C (A), mNG-AID-LB1 (B), and mNG-AID-LB2 (C) cells; scale bar, 10 µm. (D and E) Cross-sectional nuclear area (D) and nuclear circularity (E) after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells. n > 275 cells were analyzed per condition from three independent replicate experiments. ns indicates p > 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and *, p < 0.05 by pairwise t test. (F) The percentage of nuclei with blebs detected by blinded categorical scoring after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells. n > 400 cells were analyzed per condition from three independent replicate experiments.

With these degron cell lines in hand, we set out to evaluate the acute effects of lamin isoform depletion on nuclear organization and function in this cell type. DLD1 cells express high levels of the LMNA transcript and significantly lower levels of the B-type lamins (LMNB1 and LMNB2) (Figure 1A). We first evaluated the acute consequences of depleting any lamin isoform on the nuclear enrichment of the other lamin isoforms or associated NE proteins. To accomplish this, we prepared lamina-enriched nuclear extracts after 12 h of auxin treatment and quantified protein abundance by mass spectrometry (see Materials and Methods; Supplemental Table S1). Addition of auxin to mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1 or mNG-AID-LB2 cells resulted in potent depletion of the targeted lamin isoform with no detectable changes in nuclear enrichment of the remaining isoforms (Figure 1F). Acute lamin isoform depletion had minimal effects on nuclear enrichment of lamina-associated proteins (for example, LBR, LUMA, LAP2α, or LAP2β; Figure 1F) or nuclear pore complex subunits (for example, Nup107, Nup160, and Nup205; Figure 1F). The Sun1 and Sun2 proteins appeared moderately sensitive to depletion of LB2 and LA/C, respectively (Figure 1F); this effect was reproducible for Sun1 but not Sun2 (Supplemental Figure S2, A and B). Degradation of LA/C modestly but consistently decreased the nuclear enrichment of emerin (Figure 1F; Supplemental Figure S2A), consistent with emerin's known reliance on LA/C for nuclear targeting (Sullivan et al., 1999). Altogether, these data indicate that acute lamin isoform depletion does not dramatically change the lamina-associated proteome, at least not within one cell cycle.

The NL has been implicated in regulation of gene expression (Guelen et al., 2008; Kumaran and Spector, 2008). To query the immediate impact of lamin loss on gene expression, we performed RNAseq after acute depletion of LA/C, LB1, or LB2 for 16 or 96 h (Figure 1G). To identify and control for the effects of auxin treatment on gene expression, we also performed RNAseq on DLD1 parental cells after treatment with DMSO vehicle or auxin for 16 or 96 h. Any auxin-sensitive genes in lamin degron conditions were then excluded from further analysis (see Supplemental Table S2). We found that short (16 h) depletion of each lamin isoform resulted in a relatively small number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) (Figure 1G; Supplemental Table S3). After prolonged (96 h) LA/C depletion, a larger number of DEGs accumulated (Figure 1G; Supplemental Table S3). In contrast, the number of DEGs after prolonged LB1 or LB2 depletion remained modest (Figure 1G; Supplemental Table S3). Overall, there was very little overlap in DEGs between lamin isoforms (Supplemental Figure S3B), and DEGs did not strongly cluster into transcriptional networks (Supplemental Table S4). These results indicate that dysregulation of gene expression is not a shared and immediate response to lamin depletion.

Acute lamin depletion is not sufficient to drive changes in nuclear morphology

It has been previously reported that loss of any of the lamin isoforms can result in changes to nuclear morphology. For instance, KO or KD of LA/C decreases nuclear circularity (Sullivan et al., 1999; Broers et al., 2004; Lammerding et al., 2006; Robijns et al., 2016), while KO or KD of LB1 induces nuclear blebbing and/or micronucleus formation (Vergnes et al., 2004; Lammerding et al., 2006; Coffinier et al., 2011). We evaluated the acute effects of lamin depletion on nuclear morphology by quantifying nuclear cross-sectional area, nuclear circularity, and nuclear blebbing frequency in mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells after 16 h of auxin treatment. Surprisingly, we generally failed to detect significant changes to nuclear shape or size in lamin-depleted nuclei (Figure 2, A–E), except for a modest increase in nuclear cross-sectional area after LB2 depletion (Figure 2D) and a modest decrease in nuclear circularity after LB1 depletion (Figure 2E). Furthermore, we failed to detect any increase to blebbing/micronucleation in lamin-depleted nuclei (Figure 2F). Altogether, these data indicate that acute lamin depletion is not sufficient to induce immediate nuclear morphology defects in this cell type.

LB1 depletion induces immediate lamin A/C meshwork disorganization

Each lamin isoform builds homotypic but overlapping polymeric meshworks at the nuclear periphery (Kittisopikul et al., 2019), and lamin filament assembly appears to be interdependent (Shimi et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2014). It has previously been reported that LB1 KD results in LA/C meshwork disorganization (Shimi et al., 2008). To determine whether LA/C meshwork disorganization is an immediate consequence of LB1 depletion, we treated mNG-AID-LB1 cells with auxin for 0, 2, 4, 8 and 16 h and tracked LB1 abundance and LA/C organization by immunofluorescence microscopy. This analysis revealed that LA/C meshwork disorganization coincides with LB1 depletion, as each of these phenotypes become apparent within 4 h of auxin treatment (Figure 3, A–C). We initially evaluated this phenotype by blinded categorical scoring, which detected LA/C meshwork gaps in ∼20% of cells within 8 h of auxin treatment (Figure 3C). LB1 depletion is accompanied by opening of amorphous gaps in the LA/C meshwork, which are sometimes randomly distributed across the nuclear surface and are sometimes found at a nuclear pole (Figure 3A). We developed an analysis pipeline to more sensitively quantify the percentage of the nuclear surface lacking LA/C in the presence versus absence of LB1 (Figure 3, D–F; see Materials and Methods). This analysis demonstrated that the LA/C meshwork is contiguous in 95% of untreated cells, defined here as <1% of nuclear surface lacking LA/C. After 16 h of LB1 depletion, in contrast, 43% of cells accumulate LA/C gaps covering >1% of the nuclear surface, while a small proportion of cells (4%) develop severe LA/C gaps covering >10% of the nuclear surface (Figure 3, E–F).

FIGURE 3:

FIGURE 3:

LB1 depletion induces immediate lamin A/C meshwork disorganization. (A) Immunofluorescence of mNeonGreen and lamin A/C after 0, 2, 4, 8, and 16 h of auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LB1 cells; scale bar, 10 µm. (B) Normalized mNeonGreen intensity after 0, 2, 4, 8, and 16 h of auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LB1 cells. (C) The percentage of nuclei with lamin A/C defects detected by blinded categorical scoring after 0, 2, 4, 8, and 16 h of auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LB1 cells. In B and C, ns indicates p > 0.05; *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test. Average values of three independent replicate experiments shown; n > 350 cells analyzed per condition. (D) Representative masks of lamin A/C immunostaining in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after 0 h (left) or 16 h (right) of auxin treatment. (E) Summary plot of the percentage of nuclei with contiguous lamin A/C (<1% lamin A/C-free nuclear surface), with gaps in the lamin A/C meshwork covering >1% of the nuclear surface (orange), or with gaps covering >10% of the nuclear surface (red) in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after 0 h (n = 542) or 16 h (n = 522) auxin treatment. ****, p < 0.0001 by the Fisher's exact test. (F) Normalized histograms of the percentage of lamin A/C-free nuclear surface area in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after 0 h (n = 542) or 16 h (n = 522) auxin treatment. Curves indicate mean and error bars indicate SD of three independent replicate experiments. (G) Immunofluorescence of mNeonGreen and lamin A/C after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LB2 cells. (H) Normalized mNeonGreen intensity after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LB2 cells. (I) The percentage of nuclei with lamin A/C defects detected by blinded categorical scoring after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment in mNG-AID-LB2 cells. In H and I, ***, p < 0.001 and ns indicates p > 0.05 by the pairwise t test. n > 300 cells analyzed per condition in three independent replicate experiments.

Acute LB1 depletion also induces similar disorganization of the INM protein LBR (Supplemental Figure S4, A–D), implying effects on both the lamina and other components of the nuclear periphery. In contrast, LB2 depletion had no effect on the LA/C meshwork or on LBR, indicating that these effects are specific to LB1 (Figure 3, D–F; Supplemental Figure S4, C and D) even though these homologous isoforms are expressed at comparable levels in DLD1 cells (Figure 1A). Finally, LA/C depletion had no effect on the organization of LB1, LB2, or LBR (Supplemental Figure S4, E–H), indicating that LB1 exerts unique influence on the organization of the NL.

Lamin A/C meshwork defects are reversed by actin depolymerization

Cytoskeletal forces are transmitted to the lamina via the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex (King, 2023). Because LINC complex components interact with the A-type lamins (Crisp et al., 2005), we hypothesized that cytoskeletal forces on the LA/C meshwork induce defects in the absence of LB1. To test this hypothesis, we degraded LB1, then depolymerized the actin cytoskeleton by transient latrunculin A (Lat A) treatment (Figure 4A), which prevents actin polymerization by binding and sequestering monomeric actin (Coué et al., 1987) (Figure 4A). Lat A treatment increases nuclear height, confirming that the compressive effect of actin on the nucleus has been relieved (Figure 4B). Strikingly, 1 h of actin depolymerization completely reverses the effects of LB1 depletion on LA/C meshwork organization (Figure 4, C–G) and removes all detectable LA/C gaps (Figure 4, H and I). This outcome is consistent with the model that LB1 promotes proper LA/C meshwork organization at least in part by resisting actin forces on the nucleus. However, these data do not address whether the cytoplasmic and/or nuclear actin pools specifically influence LA/C meshwork organization. The onset of LA/C meshwork defects upon LB1 loss and their resolution after actin depolymerization indicates that LA/C meshwork defects are rapid and reversible.

FIGURE 4:

FIGURE 4:

Lamin A/C meshwork defects are reversed by actin depolymerization. (A) Overview of experimental strategy. mNG-AID-LB1 cells were treated with DMSO or auxin for 16 h followed by an hour of DMSO or Lat A treatment. mNG-AID-LB1 cells were then fixed and immunostained. (B) xz view to show nuclear height of mNG-AID-LB1 cells immunostained for lamin A/C after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment followed by 1 h of additional DMSO or Lat A. (C–F) Immunofluorescence of mNeonGreen, lamin A/C and actin after mNG-AID-LB1 cells were treated with (C) DMSO or (E) auxin for 16 h. mNG-AID-LB1 cells were then treated with (D) Lat A for an hour or (F) 16 h of auxin followed by 1 h of Lat A treatment; scale bar, 10 µm. (G) Quantification of the percentage of nuclei with lamin A/C defects (detected by blinded categorical scoring) after mNG-AID-LB1 cells were treated with DMSO or auxin for 16 h followed by 1 h of additional DMSO or Lat A treatment. (H) Normalized histograms of the percentage of lamin A/C-free nuclear surface area in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after 16 h auxin treatment (blue) or 16 h auxin treatment + 1 h Lat A treatment (gray). Curves indicate mean and error bars indicate SD of three independent experiments. (I) Summary plot of the percentage of nuclei with contiguous lamin A/C (<1% lamin A/C-free nuclear surface, gray), with gaps in the lamin A/C meshwork covering >1% of the nuclear surface (orange), or with gaps covering >10% of the nuclear surface (red) in mNG-AID-LB1 cells in the indicated conditions. n > 400 cells analyzed per condition in three independent replicate experiments. ****, p < 0.0001 by the Fisher's exact test.

Neither Lamin A/C nor LB1 depletion are sufficient to cause nuclear rupture

Our data indicate that acute LB1 depletion rapidly induces defects in the LA/C meshwork (Figure 3, A and C). Gaps in the lamin meshwork are thought to weaken the nucleus and predispose nuclei to rupture (Maciejowski and Hatch, 2020). To determine whether acute LB1 and/or LA/C depletion induce nuclear rupture, we generated dual color nuclear rupture reporter cell lines stably expressing the tdTomato fluorescent protein fused to three tandem nuclear localization signals (3xNLS-tdTomato) and histone H2B fused to a monomeric near-infrared fluorescent protein (H2B-mIRFP). In this system, the presence of cytosolic 3xNLS-tdTomato indicates nuclear rupture, while H2B-mIRFP marks nuclei. We imaged mNG-AID-LA/C and mNG-AID-LB1 nuclear rupture reporter cells in the absence or presence of auxin at 3-min intervals for 4 h (Figure 5; Supplemental Movies S1 and S2). Surprisingly, we observed no significant increase in nuclear rupture in the absence of either LA/C (Figure 5, A–C) or LB1 (Figure 5, D–F). These data indicate that acute LB1 depletion and subsequent LA/C meshwork disorganization are not sufficient to cause nuclear rupture in this cell type.

FIGURE 5:

FIGURE 5:

Neither Lamin A/C nor LB1 depletion are sufficient to cause nuclear rupture. (A and B) Still images from time-lapse imaging of mNG-AID-LA/C cells stably expressing 3xNLS-tdTomato and treated with DMSO vehicle control (A) or with auxin (B) for 16 h. (C) Quantification of NE rupture in mNG-AID-LA/C cells after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment. Average values for replicate experiments shown; n > 400 cells analyzed across three replicate experiments. (D and E) Still images from time-lapse imaging of mNG-AID-LB1 cells expressing 3xNLS-tdTomato and treated with DMSO vehicle control (D) or with auxin (E) for 16 h; scale bar, 10 µm. (F) Quantification of NE rupture in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment. Average values for replicate experiments shown; n > 600 cells analyzed across three replicate experiments.

Movie S1.

Download video file (815.8KB, mp4)

Nuclear integrity in auxin-treated mNG-AID-LAC cells, relevant to Figure 5. mNG-AID-LAC DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta), then treated with auxin for 16 hours before live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

Movie S2.

Download video file (643.3KB, mp4)

Nuclear integrity in auxin-treated mNG-AID-LB1 cells, relevant to Figure 5. mNG-AID-LB1 DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta), then treated with auxin for 16 hours before live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

LAP2β and LB1 codepletion increases lamin A/C meshwork defects

The lamins are thought to play a major role in maintaining nuclear integrity, and nuclei harboring lamin mutations or lacking lamin isoforms have been shown to be more prone to rupture (Vos et al., 2011; Vargas et al., 2012; Tamiello et al., 2013; Comaills et al., 2016; Hatch and Hetzer, 2016; Chen et al., 2018; 2019; Xia et al., 2018). Considering this precedent, we were surprised that we did not detect nuclear rupture when either LA/C or LB1 were acutely depleted (Figure 5). We hypothesized that lamin-interacting INM proteins might maintain nuclear integrity in the absence of LA/C or LB1. We evaluated the expression levels of INM proteins in DLD1 cells by RNAseq, which revealed that the LEM family protein LAP2β (Barton et al., 2015), encoded by the TMPO gene, was very highly expressed—more highly even than the LMNB1 and LMNB2 transcripts (Figure 6A). This observation aligns with a previous report that LAP2β is highly expressed in gastrointestinal cancers (Kim et al., 2012), as DLD1 cells are of colon cancer origin. LAP2β has been recently shown to counteract progerin-induced lamin meshwork disorganization and to protect LB1-null neurons from nuclear rupture (Chen et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2024). These findings led us to hypothesize that high levels of LAP2β protect lamin-depleted DLD1 cells from nuclear rupture.

FIGURE 6:

FIGURE 6:

LAP2β and LB1 codepletion increases lamin A/C meshwork defects in an actin-dependent manner. (A) Relative transcript abundance of lamins and various INM proteins in DLD1 cells; Nucleoplasmic TMPO splice isoform LAP2α distinguished from INM-localized splice isoform LAP2β by isoform-resolved analysis with Salmon (see Materials and Methods). (B) Overview of experimental strategy. mNG-AID-LB1 cells were subject to RNAi for 48 h followed by 16 h of auxin treatment. (C–F) Immunofluorescence of lamin A/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and actin (phalloidin) in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after control RNAi (C and D) or LAP2β RNAi (E and F) along with vehicle (C and E) or auxin (D and F). All conditions received 1 h vehicle treatment as control for G–K. (G) Normalized histograms of the percentage of lamin A/C-free nuclear surface area in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after 48 h control RNAi treatment plus 16 h auxin treatment (blue) or 48 h LAP2b RNAi treatment plus 16 h auxin treatment (orange). Curves indicate mean and error bars indicate SD of three independent experiments. (H) Summary plot of the percentage of nuclei with contiguous lamin A/C (<1% lamin A/C-free nuclear surface, gray), with gaps in the lamin A/C meshwork covering >1% of the nuclear surface (orange), or with gaps covering >10% of the nuclear surface (red) in mNG-AID-LB1 cells in the indicated conditions. ****, p < 0.0001 by the Fisher's exact test. (I) Overview of experimental strategy. mNG-AID-LB1 cells were subject to RNAi for 48 h followed by 16 h of auxin treatment, then 1 h of Lat A treatment. (J–M) Immunofluorescence of lamin A/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and actin (phalloidin) in mNG-AID-LB1 cells after control RNAi (J and K) or LAP2β RNAi (L and M) along with vehicle (J and L) or auxin (K and M). All conditions received 1 h Lat A treatment; scale bar, 10 µm. (N) Quantification of the percentage of nuclei with lamin A/C defects detected by blinded categorical scoring. Each dot on graph represents one experimental replicate; n > 400 cells analyzed per condition across at least three replicate experiments. ns indicates p > 0.05; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; and ****, p < 0.0001 by the unpaired t test.

To test this hypothesis, mNG-AID-LB1 cells were subjected to small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated KD of LAP2β using validated isoform-specific siRNAs (Mirza et al., 2019) (Figure 6B; Supplemental Figure S5, A–C). We found that LAP2β KD caused defects in both LA/C and LB1 meshwork organization (Figure 6E; Supplemental Figure S5C). We could visualize the dynamics of LB1 meshwork defects over time in living LAP2β-depleted mNG-AID-LB1 cells by imaging the mNG tag (Supplemental Movie S3). LB1 depletion along with LAP2β KD further disorganized the LA/C meshwork, inducing both larger and more frequent LA/C meshwork defects (Figure 6, B–H). LA/C meshwork defects caused by LAP2β depletion were improved by Lat A-mediated actin depolymerization (Figure 6, I–N). To confirm these results, we targeted LAP2β with RNAi in DLD1 cells (Supplemental Figure S6, A–B). In contrast with our findings in the mNG-AID-LB1 background, KD of LAP2β alone in DLD1 cells did not induce LA/C defects. However, KD of both LB1 and LAP2β together did (Supplemental Figure S6, A and B). This outcome indicates that mNG-AID-LB1 cells are more sensitive to LAP2β depletion than normal DLD1 cells. We infer that the expression and/or function of LB1 is weakened by the introduction of the mNG-AID tag in the mNG-AID-LB1 cell line. We noted that tagging reduces LB1 transcript and protein expression (Supplemental Figure S3C; Figure 1D). As endogenous N-terminal tagging interferes with the function of LA/C (Odell and Lammerding, 2024), it is also possible that the mNG-AID tag impairs LB1 function. We therefore conclude that disruption of LB1 and LAP2β together causes LA/C meshwork defects and infer that these proteins work synergistically to promote the normal organization of the NL.

Movie S3.

Download video file (7.8MB, mp4)

Lamina dynamics in LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells, relevant to Figure 6. Live imaging of stably expressed H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta) and endogenously tagged mNG-AID-LB1 (cyan) after treatment of cells with LAP2β RNAi for 48 hours. Live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

LAP2β and LB1 codepletion induces nuclear rupture

Codepletion of LAP2β and LB1 induced both larger and more frequent LA/C defects than either perturbation alone (Figure 6, B–H), leading us to ask whether these perturbations would together cause nuclear rupture. To evaluate the effect of LAP2β loss on nuclear integrity, we knocked down LAP2β and performed live imaging in mNG-AID-LB1 cells stably expressing tdTomato-3xNLS and H2B-mIRFP. LAP2β KD caused a low but significant incidence of nuclear rupture in mNG-AID-LB1 cells (Figure 7, D and I; Supplemental Movie S4), while acute depletion of LB1 alone did not induce significant levels of nuclear rupture (Figure 5, D–F; Figure 7, C and I). The frequency of rupture was significantly increased by the codepletion of both LAP2β and LB1 (Figure 7, E and I; Supplemental Movie S5). This result indicates that LAP2β expression can protect nuclear integrity in the absence of LB1, consistent with recent studies in LB1 KO cells (Chen et al., 2021).

FIGURE 7:

FIGURE 7:

LAP2β and LB1 codepletion induces nuclear rupture in an actin-dependent manner. (A) Overview of experimental strategy. mNG-AID-LB1 cells were subject to RNAi for 48 h followed by 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment and live imaging at ×40 magnifications with images of 3xNLS-TdTomato and H2B-IRFP acquired every 3 min for 4 h. (B–E) Still images from time-lapse imaging of mNG-AID-LB1 cells expressing 3xNLS-tdTomato and treated with control RNAi (B), control RNAi + auxin(C), LAP2β RNAi (D), or LAP2β RNAi + auxin (E). See also Supplemental Movies S4 and S5. (F) Overview of experimental strategy for panels (G–J). mNG-AID-LB1 cells were subject to RNAi for 48 h followed by 16 h of DMSO or auxin treatment and 1 h of either Lat A drug treatment (G–I) or colchicine drug treatment (J) followed by live imaging at ×40 magnifications with images of 3xNLS-TdTomato and H2B-mIRFP acquired every 3 min for 4 h. (G and H) Still images from time-lapse imaging of mNG-AID-LB1 cells expressing 3xNLS-tdTomato and treated with LAP2β RNAi and Lat A (G) or LAP2β RNAi + auxin + Lat A (H); scale bar, 20 µm. See also Supplemental Movies S7 and S8. (I) Quantification of NE rupture in AID-LB1 cells after indicated RNAi, 16 h of DMSO or auxin followed by additional DMSO or Lat A. Each dot on graph represents one replicate; n > 200 cells analyzed per condition. (J) Quantification of NE rupture in AID-LB1 cells after indicated RNAi, 16 h of DMSO or auxin followed by additional DMSO or colchicine. See also Supplemental Movie S9. Each dot on graph represents one replicate; n > 420 cells analyzed per condition. ns indicates p > 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ****, padj < 0.0001 by the unpaired t test.

Movie S4.

Download video file (789.9KB, mp4)

Nuclear rupture in LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells, relevant to Figure 7. mNG-AID-LB1 DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta) were transfected with LAP2β RNAi 48 hours before live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

Movie S5.

Download video file (676.9KB, mp4)

Nuclear rupture in auxin-treated, LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells, relevant to Figure 7. mNG-AID-LB1 DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta) were transfected with LAP2β RNAi 48 hours before auxin treatment for 16 additional hours, followed by live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

Movie S6.

Download video file (346.2KB, mp4)

Nuclear rupture and lamina dynamics in LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells, relevant to Figure 8. Live imaging of stably expressed NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, magenta) and endogenously tagged mNG-AID-LB1 (cyan) after treatment of cells with LAP2β RNAi for 48 hours. Live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

Movie S7.

Download video file (513.2KB, mp4)

Nuclear integrity in LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells after actin depolymerization, relevant to Figure 7. mNG-AID-LB1 DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta) were transfected with LAP2β RNAi 48 hours, then treated with latrunculin A for 1 hour before live imaging at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

Movie S8.

Download video file (496.8KB, mp4)

Nuclear integrity in auxin-treated, LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells after actin depolymerization, relevant to Figure 7. mNG-AID-LB1 DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta) were transfected with LAP2β RNAi 48 hours before auxin treatment for 16 additional hours, followed by treatment with latrunculin A for 1 hour. Cells imaged at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

Movie S9.

Download video file (589.3KB, mp4)

Nuclear rupture in auxin-treated, LAP2β-knockdown mNG-AID-LB1 cells after microtubule depolymerization, relevant to Figure 7. mNG-AID-LB1 DLD-1 cells stably expressing NLS-tdTomato (nuclear integrity reporter, cyan) and H2B-IRFP (chromatin marker, magenta) were transfected with LAP2β RNAi 48 hours before auxin treatment for 16 additional hours, followed by treatment with latrunculin A for 1 hour. Cells imaged at 40X magnification every 3 minutes for 4 hours.

The compression of the nucleus by the actin cytoskeleton has previously been shown to drive nuclear rupture (Hatch and Hetzer, 2016). We wanted to determine whether actin forces contribute to nuclear rupture in DLD1 cells depleted of LAP2β and LB1. To test this possibility, we depleted LAP2β and/or LB1, then treated cells with Lat A for 1 h before live imaging. Actin depolymerization strongly reduced nuclear rupture frequency when LAP2β or both LAP2β and LB1 were depleted (Figure 7, F–I; Supplemental Movies S7 and S8). We conclude that nuclear rupture induced by LAP2β KD and LB1 depletion is caused by actin-generated forces. This effect appears to be specific to the actin network, as colchicine-induced microtubule depolymerization had no effect on LA/C meshwork gaps (Supplemental Figure S7, A–F) and did not decrease nuclear rupture frequency (Figure 7J; Supplemental Figure S7, G and H; Supplemental Movie S9).

We could compare lamina defects with sites of nuclear ruptures in LAP2β-depleted cells by imaging mNG-AID-LB1 and the 3xNLS-TdTomato reporter, respectively (Supplemental Movie 6). These analyses suggest that nuclear ruptures occur at membrane sites that overlay large lamina defects (Figure 8; Supplemental Movie S6). We also found examples of ruptures that were preceded by localized nuclear blebbing within large lamina defects (Figure 8, yellow arrowheads; Supplemental Movie S6). Interestingly, these observations indicate that lamina defects do not induce the entire overlying membrane area to bleb, but rather that blebbing initiates at a localized membrane site.

FIGURE 8:

FIGURE 8:

Nuclear ruptures occur within lamina gaps in LAP2β-depleted mNG-AID-LB1 cells. Still images from time-lapse imaging of mNG-AID-LB1 cells treated with LAP2β RNAi and expressing 3xNLS-TdTomato and H2B-IRFP (channel not shown). Yellow arrowheads indicate nuclear blebs and * indicates nuclear ruptures; scale bar, 10 µm. See also Supplemental Movie S6.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we took advantage of the AID system to dissect the immediate impact of lamin loss on nuclear function. We explored the influence of the lamins on the composition of the NE proteome (Figure 1F), gene expression (Figure 1G), nuclear morphology (Figure 2), and nuclear integrity (Figure 5). Altogether, these studies indicated significant latency and/or pleiotropy in several phenotypes that have previously been associated with loss of lamin function.

The NL has been linked to regulation of gene expression (Briand and Collas, 2020). However, we found that acute depletion of each lamin isoform (16 h) had little effect on gene expression (Figure 1G), indicating that gene expression changes are not an immediate consequence of lamin depletion. Prolonged depletion (96 h) of LA/C did induce more widespread dysregulation of gene expression (Figure 1G). When incorporated into the NL, LA/C has been implicated in repression (Solovei et al., 2013), while nucleoplasmic LA/C, in contrast, has been associated with active transcription (Gesson et al., 2016; Ikegami et al., 2020). Interestingly, a nucleoplasmic pool of mNG-AID-LA/C is readily detectable in DLD1 cells (Figure 2A), and we observed many downregulated genes after prolonged LA/C depletion (Figure 1F), implying that LA/C may contribute to active transcription in DLD1 cells.

Many prior studies have linked lamin perturbations to nuclear deformations in primary, immortalized, and transformed cell lines (Vergnes et al., 2004; Lammerding et al., 2006; Coffinier et al., 2011; Schibler et al., 2023). We did not detect such changes in nuclear shape after acute depletion of any lamin isoform in DLD1 cells (Figure 2). This outcome indicates that acute lamin isoform depletion is not sufficient to induce either nuclear shape changes or nuclear blebbing. There are several potential explanations for the inconsistency between our findings and previous reports. It is possible that nuclear shape changes are a secondary consequence of lamin isoform loss that become apparent only after multiple cell cycles; however, we did not observe any increase in nuclear deformations or blebbing after prolonged (96 h) auxin treatment (not shown). Alternatively, it is possible that the influence of orthogonal regulators of nuclear morphology varies across cell types. For instance, heterochromatin compaction and actin contractility each influence nuclear blebbing propensity (Stephens et al., 2018; Pho et al., 2024) and are variable across cell types. Notably, a recent RNAi screen for regulators of nuclear shape found extensive variation between two cell lines (Schibler et al., 2023). Depletion of various chromatin regulators influenced nuclear shape, but one of the few consistent hits in both cell types was LA/C (Schibler et al., 2023). It has been established that the relative stoichiometry of A- to B-type lamins influences NL properties (Swift et al., 2013). Given the high expression of A-type lamins in DLD1 cells (Figure 1A), it is surprising that acute LA/C depletion had no detectable effect on nuclear morphology (Figure 2) or on nuclear integrity (Figure 5, A–C).

We determined that LA/C meshwork defects are an immediate consequence of LB1 but not LB2 depletion (Figure 3), indicating that this previously described phenomenon(Shimi et al., 2008; Hatch and Hetzer, 2016) is a rapid and specific consequence of LB1 loss. LA/C defects are rapidly and potently corrected by Lat A-mediated actin depolymerization (Figure 4). This outcome implies that gaps in the LA/C meshwork are a result of increased vulnerability to actin forces in the absence of LB1. On average, ∼40% of nuclei experience LA/C meshwork disorganization because of LB1 depletion (Figure 3E). One might expect that prolonged periods of LB1 depletion would increase the number of nuclei with LA/C defects; however, we did not see this even after prolonged (96 h) auxin treatment (not shown). We speculate that other factors (such as LAP2β) keep the lamina intact when LB1 is depleted, and/or that the cells that show LA/C disorganization when LB1 is depleted experience the greatest actin force on the lamina. Separately, it is possible that the LA/C meshwork is most vulnerable to disorganization at a specific stage in the cell cycle (Lomakin et al., 2020).

Nuclear rupture is thought to occur at NL gaps (Maciejowski and Hatch, 2020). However, we found that LB1 depletion caused LA/C meshwork defects without inducing nuclear rupture in DLD1 cells (Figure 5, D–F). This observation indicates that nuclear integrity can be maintained when gaps in the NL are present, and hints that additional factors influence nuclear integrity. We identified the highly expressed INM protein LAP2β as one such factor (Figures 6 and 7). LAP2β and LB1 codepletion increased the size and frequency of NL gaps (Figure 6, B–F) and induced nuclear ruptures (Figure 7, D and E).

Several lines of evidence suggest that LAP2β has a major influence on NL function. LAP2β overexpression inhibits nuclear rupture in LB1-depleted cells (Maciejowski et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2021) and can even mitigate the dominant, toxic effects of the mutant LA/C isoform progerin on NL organization and nuclear integrity (Kim et al., 2024). Our findings add to this body of evidence by demonstrating that LB1 and LAP2β codepletion induces major NL defects. LAP2β binds LB1 but not LA/C (Foisner and Gerace, 1993). In addition to binding LB1, LAP2β interacts with the DNA-crosslinking protein barrier to autointegration factor 1 (BANF1/BAF) via a conserved LEM domain and binds directly to DNA via a divergent LEM-like domain (Cai et al., 2001). Although BAF and other LEM proteins participate in the repair of nuclear ruptures, LAP2β has not been implicated in this process; it is not recruited to sites of rupture (Halfmann et al., 2019) and its depletion does not prolong nuclear rupture (Chen et al., 2021). Altogether, these pieces of evidence suggest that LAP2β could enhance nuclear integrity by tethering the INM to both LB1 and chromatin. The roles of LAP2β’s protein:protein and protein:DNA interactions in maintaining nuclear integrity will require future investigation.

The use of auxin-mediated degrons to probe protein function is not without limitations. Gene editing can disrupt endogenous transcriptional regulation, tagging can interfere with protein folding (Odell and Lammerding, 2024), and degron-tagged proteins can undergo “leaky” degradation in the absence of auxin (Hills-Muckey et al., 2021). We observed that insertion of the AID tag moderately reduced both transcript and protein levels of the lamins (Figure 1, C–E; Supplemental Figure S3C), suggesting that any or all of these effects could be at play in our system. It is possible that this chronic diminution of lamin protein abundance could allow cellular adaptation over time and could moderate the potency of phenotypes observed after complete auxin-mediated depletion. Future improvements such as less perturbative tagging of internal linker sequences and use of a next-generation Tir1 ligase (Hills-Muckey et al., 2021) may enable better preservation of lamin function and tighter control of protein depletion in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Request a protocol through Bio-protocol

Degron cell line generation

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination was used to introduce tags into the 5′ end of each lamin isoform locus (LMNA, LMNB1, and LMNB2). Cas9 was targeted to these loci by gRNAs cloned into the pX330 vector backbone (Addgene, #42230); gRNA sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S5. For each target locus, an HR template was cloned, including 5′ and 3′ homology arms amplified from genomic DNA extracted from DLD1 cells, except 3′ homology arm for LMNB2, which was synthesized by Synbio Technologies. These homology arms flank a hygromycin resistance gene, P2A sequence, mNeonGreen tag (Aksenova et al., 2020), and microAID tag (Morawska and Ulrich, 2013).

After AID tag insertion, cells were subjected to a second round of CRISPR/Cas9 editing to introduce P2A-9xMyc-Tir1 into the 3′end of the RCC1 locus. Lamin locus edits were verified by genotyping PCR for homozygous insertion of tags with primers listed in Supplemental Table S4.

Cell culture

DLD1s were cultured in DMEM (GenClone, 25-501) supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were incubated at 5% CO2 and at 37°C. Auxin (Sigma-Aldrich, I5148) was dissolved in DMSO (where indicated) or water and used at a concentration of 1 mM. Lat A (Thermo Fisher Scientific, L12370) was dissolved in DMSO and used at a concentration of 1 µm.

Analysis of nuclear extracts by mass spectrometry

A lamina/NPC-enriched fraction was isolated according to Cronshaw (Cronshaw et al., 2002), with modifications as recently described (Aksenova et al., 2020). Cells were incubated in culture dishes for 2 × 5 min in buffer A (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8; 2 mM DTT, 10% sucrose, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 1% Tx100, 0.075% SDS) at room temperature, followed by incubation in buffer B (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8; 2 mM DTT, 10% sucrose, 0,1 mM MgCl2), containing 4 µg/ml RNAse A (Promega) for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were then washed in buffer A. Cells were then incubated in buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8; 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 10% sucrose, 0.3% Empigen BB) for 10 min at 37 °C. This nucleoporin and lamin-enriched supernatant was spun for 3 min at 28,000 × g at 4°C, then transferred to fresh tubes. Saturated TCA was added to a final concentration of 8%, followed by centrifugation and washing the pellet in ethanol. The pellet was finally solubilized in buffer D (8 M urea, 5 mM DTT) by pipetting and vortexing, then centrifuged for 1 min at 11,000 × g. The supernatant was collected for protein concentration and proteomic analysis.

Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in label-free quantitation mode (Figure 1F, one replicate) or as multiplexed tandem mass–tagged (TMT) samples (Supplemental Figure S2A, one replicate). In the latter case, samples were labeled with TMT reagents (TMT10plex label reagent set, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were run on an LTQ Orbitrap Lumos nanoLCMS system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein identification and quantification was performed in Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptide IDs were assigned by searching the raw data against the UniProt human database using the Mascot algorithm (Matrix Science); peptide-spectrum matches were further validated with the Percolate algorithm. The median values of peptide-level fold changes were calculated to determine protein-level fold changes.

siRNAs

siRNAs specifically against LAP2β (Mirza et al., 2019) were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich with the following sequences: LAP2β.1, 5′-CAGAGGAGCGAAGAGUAGA[dT][dT]-3′ LAP2β.2, 5′-GCAUGCAUCUUCUAUUCUG[dT][dT]-3′ and LAP2β.3, 5′-UGGACGAGUGGAUCUUCAA[dT][dT]-3′. MISSION esiRNA against LMNB1 were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich (EHU057911). A nontargeting control siRNA was ordered from Dharmcon (D-001810-01-20). Cells were transfected with 125 nM RNAi using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, 11668019) transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were incubated for at least 48 h after RNAi transfection.

Immunofluorescence

Cells in Ibidi chambers (Ibidi, 80826) were fixed in 4% PFA for 5 min, and permeabilized and blocked in PBS, 0.1% Tx100, 0.02% SDS, 10 mg/ml BSA (IF buffer) before staining with primary and secondary antibodies diluted in IF buffer. Primary antibody dilutions were as follows: Lamin A/C (1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-376248), LB1 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-365214), LB2 (1:500, Thermo Scientific 33-2100), LAP2β (1:400, Thermo Scientific PA5-52519), LBR (1:1000, Abcam ab232731), NPCs (1:1000, Abcam ab24609), and α-Tubulin (1:1000, GeneTex GTX628802). Secondary antibody dilutions were as follows: 568 Alexa-Fluor Goat anti-Rabbit (1:1000, Life Technologies A-11011), 568 Alexa-Fluor Goat anti-Mouse (1:1000, Life Technologies A-11004), 647 Alexa-Fluor Goat ant-Rabbit (1:1000, Life Technologies A-21245), 647 Alexa-Fluor Goat anti-Mouse (1:1000, Life Technologies A-21236). For phalloidin staining, cells in Ibidi chambers were fixed in 3.7% PFA for 10 min, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min and blocked in 1 mg/ml BSA for an hour. Cells were incubated with conjugated 568-Phalloidin (1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific A12380) in 1 mg/ml BSA in PBS.

Nuclear rupture plasmid and cell line generation

The nuclear rupture reporter plasmid was generated by cloning H2B-mIRFP (Piatkevich et al., 2018) and 3(SV40)NLS-tdtomato (Adam et al., 1989; Shaner et al., 2004) separated by a P2A (Kim et al., 2011) sequence into a PiggyBac plasmid via Gibson assembly. To generate stable cell lines, mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells were transfected with the nuclear rupture reporter plasmid and PiggyBac transposase plasmid using jetprime transfection reagent (Polyplus, 101000027). AID cells were selected in blasticidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A1113902) for 7 d.

Image acquisition and analysis

Images were taken using an inverted Nikon Ti microscope equipped with a CSU-X1 spinning disk confocal with a 60 × 1.4 NA oil objective. All image processing and quantification was performed with ImageJ. Images are shown as maximum intensity projections of z stacks. Nuclear area was quantified by measuring the cross-sectional area occupied by a mask corresponding to a DNA stain. LB1 signal intensity was quantified by measuring the maximum intensity projections of the LB1 channel by a mask corresponding to a DNA stain. Nuclear shape was determined based off a mask of the DNA stain. The frequency of nuclear blebs and LA/C defects were each determined by blinded categorical scoring of nuclei as showing or lacking each phenotype in maximum intensity projections. The size of lamin A/C meshwork gaps was quantified as the percentage of the total nuclear surface area by making maximum intensity projections of single nuclear surfaces, thresholding the DNA stain to determine nuclear surface area, and then thresholding the lamin A/C stain to determine the size of lamin A/C gaps.

Time lapse imaging and nuclear rupture analysis

Time lapse images were taken using an inverted Nikon Ti microscope equipped with a CSU-X1 spinning disk confocal and an OkoLab cage incubator with CO2 and humidity control with a 40 × 0.95 NA objective. Cells in ibidi chambers were kept at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Images were acquired every 3 min for 4 h. For actin depolymerization experiments, Lat A was added 1 h before the start of image acquisition. To quantify nuclear rupture, all nuclei in the field were counted then the presence of H2B-mIRFP marked nuclei and cytoplasmic tdTomato were manually counted and considered a rupture event. For microtuble depolymerization experiments, Colchicine (50 µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich C9754) was added 1 h before the start of image acquisition. To quantify nuclear rupture, all nuclei in the field were counted then the presence of H2B-mIRFP marked nuclei and cytoplasmic tdTomato were manually counted and considered a rupture event.

Western blot assay

Cell pellets were lysed with a buffer containing 8 M Urea, 75 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, and one tablet of cOmplete, Mini, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, 11836170001). Protein lysates were quantified using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific 23225). A total of 20 µg of protein was loaded per well. Protein lysates were run on mini-PROTEAN precast 4 to 15% gels (Bio-Rad 4561094) followed by wet transfer onto 0.45 µm nitrocellulose membranes (GVS, 1212590). Blots were probed with Lamin A/C (1:1000, Active Motif 39288), LB1 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-365214), LB2 (1:500, Thermo Scientific 33-2100), Sun 2 (1:1000, Abcam ab124916), and GAPDH (1:1000, GeneTex GTX637966) primary antibodies in 5% milk TBST. Anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (1:5000, Rockland 610-1302) and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (1:5000, Rockland 611-130) secondary antibodies were used. Blots were visualized using Pierce ECL Western blotting substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 32209) and Radiance Plus—Chemiluminescent Substrate (Azure Biosystems, AC2103).

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism9 was used to generate all graphs and perform statistical analyses.

RNAseq library preparation

DLD1 parental, mNG-AID-LA/C, mNG-AID-LB1, and mNG-AID-LB2 cells were treated with auxin for 0, 16, or 96 h. Three to four replicates per condition were used. Each replicate was one well of a 6-well plate (Corning, 3516). RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN 74136). Before prepping the libraries, the RNA was DNAse treated using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Invitrogen, AM1907). The libraries were prepped using the Illumina Stranded Total RNA Prep, Ligation with Ribo-Zero Plus kit (Illumina, 20040529) following the standard protocol. Each library was given a unique index using IDT for Illumina—DNA/RNA UD indexes Set A (Illumina, 20026121). The library was pooled in equimolar amounts. Paired-end sequencing on the pooled library was done using the Illumina NextSeq2000 (read length of 100 bp and read depth of ∼24 million reads per library).

RNA-seq analysis

Sequencing reads (fastq files) were mapped to the reference human genome GRCh38 using STAR aligner version 2.7.10a. The bam files were indexed using samtools version 1.10. RPKM normalized coverage files were generated from the sorted bam files using bamCoverage function of deepTools package version 3.4.5. A read counts table was generated using featureCounts version 1.6.4. The read counts table was used as an input for DESeq2 version 1.40.2 to perform differential gene expression analysis. Transcript isoforms were quantified from fastq files with the quant function from Salmon (version 1.10.3) using the default settings and the human GRCh38 transcriptome. DLD1 parental cells were treated with auxin for 16 and 96 h to generate a list of auxin-sensitive genes. Auxin-sensitive genes were manually subtracted from DEGs from each degron cell line at both 16 and 96 h timepoints. Auxin-filtered DESeq2 outputs were used for GSEA analyses.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

High-throughput sequencing data generated in this study are available at the NCBI gene expression omnibus database under the accession number GSE289252. Proteomic data generated in this study are available at the ProteomeXchange Consortium's PRIDE repository under the database identified PXD061149.

Supplementary Material

mbc-36-ar111-s001.pdf (3.8MB, pdf)
mbc-36-ar111-s002.xlsx (1.3MB, xlsx)
mbc-36-ar111-s003.xls (367KB, xls)
mbc-36-ar111-s004.xls (358.5KB, xls)
mbc-36-ar111-s005.xlsx (15.2KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank members of the Buchwalter and Nora labs for helpful discussions throughout the lifespan of this project as well as for critical feedback on the manuscript. A.B. was supported by grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM142897) and the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub. Data for this study were acquired at the Center for Advanced Light Microscopy - CVRI Microscopy Core.

Abbreviations used:

AID

auxin-inducible degron

DEGs

differentially expressed genes

INM

inner nuclear membrane

KD

knockdown

KO

knockout Lamin

A/C

LA/C Lamin

B1

LB1 Lamin

B2

LB2

LAP2b

lamin-associated polypeptide 2b

Lat A

latrunculin A

LADs

lamina-associated domains

LBR

lamin B receptor

LINC

linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton

mNG

monomeric NeonGreen

NL

nuclear lamina

NLS

nuclear localization signal.

Footnotes

This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E25-02-0057) on July 16, 2025.

REFERENCES

  1. Adam SA, Lobl TJ, Mitchell MA, Gerace L (1989). Identification of specific binding proteins for a nuclear location sequence. Nature 337, 276–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksenova V, Smith A, Lee H, Bhat P, Esnault C, Chen S, Iben J, Kaufhold R, Yau KC, Echeverria C, et al. (2020). Nucleoporin TPR is an integral component of the TREX-2 mRNA export pathway. Nat Commun 11, 4577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baird MA, Fischer RS, Jewett CE, Malide D, Cartagena-Rivera AX, Waterman CM (2023). Lamin B receptor upregulation in metastatic melanoma causes cholesterol-mediated nuclear envelope fragility. bioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton LJ, Soshnev AA, Geyer PK (2015). Networking in the nucleus: A spotlight on LEM-domain proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 34, 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Briand N, Collas P (2020). Lamina-associated domains: Peripheral matters and internal affairs. Genome Biol 21, 85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Broers JLV, Peeters EAG, Kuijpers HJH, Endert J, Bouten CVC, Oomens CWJ, Baaijens FPT, Ramaekers FCS (2004). Decreased mechanical stiffness in LMNA−/− cells is caused by defective nucleo-cytoskeletal integrity: Implications for the development of laminopathies. Hum Mol Genet 13, 2567–2580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai M, Huang Y, Ghirlando R, Wilson KL, Craigie R, Clore GM (2001). Solution structure of the constant region of nuclear envelope protein LAP2 reveals two LEM-domain structures: One binds BAF and the other binds DNA. EMBO J 20, 4399–4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen NY, Kim P, Weston TA, Edillo L, Tu Y, Fong LG, Young SG (2018). Fibroblasts lacking nuclear lamins do not have nuclear blebs or protrusions but nevertheless have frequent nuclear membrane ruptures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, 201812622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen NY, Kim PH, Tu Y, Yang Y, Heizer PJ, Young SG, Fong LG (2021). Increased expression of LAP2β eliminates nuclear membrane ruptures in nuclear lamin–deficient neurons and fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, e2107770118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen NY, Yang Y, Weston TA, Belling JN, Heizer P, Tu Y, Kim P, Edillo L, Jonas SJ, Weiss PS, et al. (2019). An absence of lamin B1 in migrating neurons causes nuclear membrane ruptures and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 25870–25879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coffinier C, Chang SY, Nobumori C, Tu Y, Farber EA, Toth JI, Fong LG, Young SG (2010). Abnormal development of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in the setting of lamin B2 deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 5076–5081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coffinier C, Jung H-J, Nobumori C, Chang S, Tu Y, Barnes RH, Yoshinaga Y, Jong PJd, Vergnes L, Reue K, et al. (2011). Deficiencies in lamin B1 and lamin B2 cause neurodevelopmental defects and distinct nuclear shape abnormalities in neurons. Mol Biol Cell 22, 4683–4693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Comaills V, Kabeche L, Morris R, Buisson R, Yu M, Madden MW, LiCausi JA, Boukhali M, Tajima K, Pan S, et al. (2016). Genomic instability is induced by persistent proliferation of cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Rep 17, 2632–2647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coué M, Brenner SL, Spector I, Korn ED (1987). Inhibition of actin polymerization by latrunculin A. FEBS Lett 213, 316–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K, Rattner JB, Shanahan C, Burke B, Stahl PD, Hodzic D (2005). Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 172, 41–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cronshaw JM, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang W, Chait BT, Matunis MJ (2002). Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 158, 915–927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Earle AJ, Kirby TJ, Fedorchak GR, Isermann P, Patel J, Iruvanti S, Moore SA, Bonne G, Wallrath LL, Lammerding J (2019). Mutant lamins cause nuclear envelope rupture and DNA damage in skeletal muscle cells. Nat Mater 19, 464–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Foisner R, Gerace L (1993). Integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope interact with lamins and chromosomes, and binding is modulated by mitotic phosphorylation. Cell 73, 1267–1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gesson K, Rescheneder P, Skoruppa MP, Haeseler Av, Dechat T, Foisner R (2016). A-type lamins bind both hetero- and euchromatin, the latter being regulated by lamina-associated polypeptide 2 alpha. Genome Res 26, 462–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza MB, Talhout W, Eussen BH, Klein Ad, Wessels L, Laat Wd, et al. (2008). Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo Y, Kim Y, Shimi T, Goldman RD, Zheng Y (2014). Concentration-dependent lamin assembly and its roles in the localization of other nuclear proteins. Mol Biol Cell 25, 1287–1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Halfmann CT, Sears RM, Katiyar A, Busselman BW, Aman LK, Zhang Q, O'Bryan CS, Angelini TE, Lele TP, Roux KJ (2019). Repair of nuclear ruptures requires barrier-to-autointegration factor. J Cell Biol 218, 2136–2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hasper J, Welle K, Swovick K, Hryhorenko J, Ghaemmaghami S, Buchwalter A (2023). Long lifetime and tissue-specific accumulation of lamin A/C in Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome. J Cell Biol 223, e202307049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hatch EM, Hetzer MW (2016). Nuclear envelope rupture is induced by actin-based nucleus confinement. J Cell Biol 215, 27–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hills-Muckey K, Martinez MAQ, Stec N, Hebbar S, Saldanha J, Medwig-Kinney TN, Moore FEQ, Ivanova M, Morao A, Ward JD, et al. (2021). An engineered, orthogonal auxin analog/AtTIR1(F79G) pairing improves both specificity and efficacy of the auxin degradation system in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 220, iyab174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ikegami K, Secchia S, Almakki O, Lieb JD, Moskowitz IP (2020). Phosphorylated Lamin A/C in the nuclear interior binds active enhancers associated with abnormal transcription in progeria. Dev Cell 52, 699–713.e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim JH, Lee S-R, Li L-H, Park H-J, Park J-H, Lee KY, Kim M-K, Shin BA, Choi S-Y (2011). High cleavage efficiency of a 2A peptide derived from porcine teschovirus-1 in human cell lines, zebrafish and mice. PLoS ONE 6, e18556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim H-J, Hwang S-H, Han M-E, Baek S, Sim H-E, Yoon S, Baek S-Y, Kim B-S, Kim J-H, Kim S-Y, et al. (2012). LAP2 Is widely overexpressed in diverse digestive tract cancers and regulates motility of cancer cells. PLoS ONE 7, e39482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim PH, Kim JR, Tu Y, Jung H, Jeong JYB, Tran AP, Presnell A, Young SG, Fong LG (2024). Progerin forms an abnormal meshwork and has a dominant-negative effect on the nuclear lamina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121, e2406946121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. King MC (2023). Dynamic regulation of LINC complex composition and function across tissues and contexts. FEBS Lett 597, 2823–2832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kittisopikul M, Virtanen L, Taimen P, Goldman RD (2019). Quantitative analysis of nuclear lamins imaged by super-resolution light microscopy. Cells 8, 361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kubben N, Voncken JW, Konings G, Weeghel Mv, Hoogenhof MMGvd, Gijbels M, Erk Av, Schoonderwoerd K, Bosch Bvd, Dahlmans V, et al. (2011). Post-natal myogenic and adipogenic developmental defects and metabolic impairment upon loss of A-type lamins. Nucleus 2, 195–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumaran RI, Spector DL (2008). A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J Cell Biol 180, 51–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lammerding J, Fong LG, Ji JY, Reue K, Stewart CL, Young SG, Lee RT (2006). Lamins A and C but Not Lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics*. J Biol Chem 281, 25768–25780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee JM, Tu Y, Tatar A, Wu D, Nobumori C, Jung H-J, Yoshinaga Y, Coffinier C, Jong PJd, Fong LG, et al. (2014). Reciprocal knock-in mice to investigate the functional redundancy of lamin B1 and lamin B2. Mol Biol Cell 25, 1666–1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leemans C, Zwalm MCHvd, Brueckner L, Comoglio F, Schaik Tv, Pagie L, Arensbergen Jv, Steensel Bv (2019). Promoter-intrinsic and local chromatin features determine gene repression in LADs. Cell 177, 852–864.e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lomakin AJ, Cattin CJ, Cuvelier D, Alraies Z, Molina M, Nader GPF, Srivastava N, Sáez PJ, Garcia-Arcos JM, Zhitnyak IY, et al. (2020). The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints. Science 370, eaba2894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Maciejowski J, Hatch EM (2020). Nuclear membrane rupture and its consequences. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 36, 85–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Maciejowski J, Li Y, Bosco N, Campbell PJ, Lange Td (2015). Chromothripsis and Kataegis induced by telomere crisis. Cell 163, 1641–1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Miroshnikova YA, Wickström SA (2021). Mechanical forces in nuclear organization. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 14, a039685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mirza AN, McKellar SA, Urman NM, Brown AS, Hollmig T, Aasi SZ, Oro AE (2019). LAP2 proteins chaperone GLI1 movement between the Lamina and chromatin to regulate transcription. Cell 176, 198–212.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morawska M, Ulrich HD (2013). An expanded tool kit for the auxin-inducible degron system in budding yeast. Yeast 30, 341–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nishimura K, Fukagawa T, Takisawa H, Kakimoto T, Kanemaki M (2009). An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nature Methods 6, 917–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nmezi B, Xu J, Fu R, Armiger TJ, Rodriguez-Bey G, Powell JS, Ma H, Sullivan M, Tu Y, Chen NY, et al. (2019). Concentric organization of A- and B-type lamins predicts their distinct roles in the spatial organization and stability of the nuclear lamina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 201810070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Odell J, Lammerding J (2024). N-terminal tags impair the ability of lamin A to provide structural support to the nucleus. J Cell Sci 137, jcs262207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pho M, Berrada Y, Gunda A, Lavallee A, Chiu K, Padam A, Currey ML, Stephens AD (2024). Actin contraction controls nuclear blebbing and rupture independent of actin confinement. Mol Biol Cell 35, ar19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Piatkevich KD, Jung EE, Straub C, Linghu C, Park D, Suk H-J, Hochbaum DR, Goodwin D, Pnevmatikakis E, Pak N, et al. (2018). A robotic multidimensional directed evolution approach applied to fluorescent voltage reporters. Nat Chem Biol 14, 352–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Poleshko A, Shah PP, Gupta M, Babu A, Morley MP, Manderfield LJ, Ifkovits JL, Calderon D, Aghajanian H, Sierra-Pagán JE, et al. (2017). Genome-nuclear lamina interactions regulate cardiac stem cell lineage restriction. Cell 171, 573–580.e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H (2008). Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452, 243–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Robijns J, Molenberghs F, Sieprath T, Corne TDJ, Verschuuren M, Vos WHD (2016). In silico synchronization reveals regulators of nuclear ruptures in lamin A/C-deficient model cells. Sci Rep 6, 30325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schibler AC, Jevtic P, Pegoraro G, Levy DL, Misteli T (2023). Identification of epigenetic modulators as determinants of nuclear size and shape. ELife 12, e80653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schreiber KH, Kennedy BK (2013). When Lamins go bad: Nuclear structure and disease. Cell 152, 1365–1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shah PP, Lv W, Rhoades JH, Poleshko A, Abbey D, Caporizzo MA, Linares-Saldana R, Heffler JG, Sayed N, Thomas D, et al. (2021). Pathogenic LMNA variants disrupt cardiac lamina–chromatin interactions and de-repress alternative fate genes. Cell Stem Cell 28, 938–954.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BNG, Palmer AE, Tsien RY (2004). Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 22, 1567–1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Shimi T, Pfleghaar K, Kojima S, Pack C-G, Solovei I, Goldman AE, Adam SA, Shumaker DK, Kinjo M, Cremer T, et al. (2008). The A- and B-type nuclear lamin networks: Microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Gene Dev 22, 3409–3421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Solovei I, Wang AS, Thanisch K, Schmidt CS, Krebs S, Zwerger M, Cohen TV, Devys D, Foisner R, Peichl L, et al. (2013). LBR and Lamin A/C sequentially tether peripheral heterochromatin and inversely regulate differentiation. Cell 152, 584–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Steensel Bv, Belmont AS (2017). Lamina-associated domains: Links with chromosome architecture, heterochromatin, and gene repression. Cell 169, 780–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Stephens AD, Liu PZ, Banigan EJ, Almassalha LM, Backman V, Adam SA, Goldman RD, Marko JF (2018). Chromatin histone modifications and rigidity affect nuclear morphology independent of lamins. Mol Biol Cell 29, 220–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sullivan T, Escalante-Alcalde D, Bhatt H, Anver M, Bhat N, Nagashima K, Stewart CL, Burke B (1999). Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J Cell Biol 147, 913–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, Harada T, Dingal PCDP, Pinter J, Pajerowski JD, Spinler KR, Shin J-W, Tewari M, et al. (2013). Nuclear Lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341, 1240104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tamiello C, Kamps MAF, Wijngaard Avd, Verstraeten VLRM, Baaijens FPT, Broers JLV, Bouten CCV (2013). Soft substrates normalize nuclear morphology and prevent nuclear rupture in fibroblasts from a laminopathy patient with compound heterozygous LMNA mutations. Nucleus 4, 61–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Vargas JD, Hatch EM, Anderson DJ, Hetzer MW (2012). Transient nuclear envelope rupturing during interphase in human cancer cells. Nucleus 3, 88–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Vergnes L, Péterfy M, Bergo MO, Young SG, Reue K (2004). Lamin B1 is required for mouse development and nuclear integrity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 10428–10433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vos WHD, Houben F, Kamps M, Malhas A, Verheyen F, Cox J, Manders EMM, Verstraeten VLRM, Steensel MAMv, Marcelis CLM, et al. (2011). Repetitive disruptions of the nuclear envelope invoke temporary loss of cellular compartmentalization in laminopathies. Hum Mol Genet 20, 4175–4186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xia Y, Ivanovska IL, Zhu K, Smith L, Irianto J, Pfeifer CR, Alvey CM, Ji J, Liu D, Cho S, et al. (2018). Nuclear rupture at sites of high curvature compromises retention of DNA repair factors. J Cell Biol 217, 3796–3808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mbc-36-ar111-s001.pdf (3.8MB, pdf)
mbc-36-ar111-s002.xlsx (1.3MB, xlsx)
mbc-36-ar111-s003.xls (367KB, xls)
mbc-36-ar111-s004.xls (358.5KB, xls)
mbc-36-ar111-s005.xlsx (15.2KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

High-throughput sequencing data generated in this study are available at the NCBI gene expression omnibus database under the accession number GSE289252. Proteomic data generated in this study are available at the ProteomeXchange Consortium's PRIDE repository under the database identified PXD061149.


Articles from Molecular Biology of the Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Cell Biology

RESOURCES