Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: For Ecol Manage. 2026 Jun;610:123674. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123674

Climate drivers of historic tree growth in the Vienna Woods and prediction of future performance of eight selected tree species

Klaus Dolschak a,e, Emilia Winter Artusio a,b, Mathias Mayer a, Michael Grabner b, Michael Tatzber c, Iftekhar U Ahmed a,c, Elisabeth Wächter b, Isolde K Berger a, Pétra Berger a,d, Wolfgang Wanek d, Torsten W Berger a,*
PMCID: PMC7619021  EMSID: EMS213381  PMID: 42027888

Abstract

This study investigates the climate sensitivity and resilience of radial growth in eight coniferous and deciduous tree species in the Vienna Woods, Austria. Using dendrochronological methods, we analyzed tree-ring width data from 63 forest plots to assess growth responses to meteorological variability over the period 1933–2023. Historic climate records were used to develop a water balance model, from which we derived seasonal growth factors. Linear mixed effects models were applied to quantify species-specific relationships between tree-ring width and climatic conditions during the current and preceding two years. Tree-ring width responded not only to climatic conditions of the current growing season but also strongly to those of the previous year. Soil moisture and air temperature emerged as the principal drivers of radial growth, with soil moisture positively and temperature negatively affecting ring width. Climatic conditions during June-July of the current year exerted the strongest impact on ring formation. Using regional climate trends and projected air temperature and precipitation trajectories for Central Europe under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, we forecast future growing conditions for the region. Both scenarios predict an extended growing season, increased transpiration demand, and heightened drought risk - more pronounced under RCP8.5. However, projected increases in precipitation partly offset the drought risk. By combining historical climate sensitivity of radial increment with future climate projections, we modelled expected tree-ring growth for eight tree species. Most species are predicted to experience notable declines in radial growth, with the strongest reductions in conifers, including European larch (Larix decidua), Norway spruce (Picea abies), Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Deciduous species - Sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), European beech (Fagus sylvatica), and sessile oak (Quercus petraea) - show moderate declines. In contrast, Turkey oak (Quercus cerris) is projected to increase radial growth under future climate scenarios. These findings suggest that forest management in the Vienna Woods and adjacent regions should prioritize the promotion of warm- and drought-tolerant tree species such as Quercus cerris to enhance forest resilience and sustainability in the face of climate change.

Keywords: Forest water balance, Soil drought, Climate change, Dendrochronology, Growth factors, Drought stress indices

1. Introduction

According to recent analyses, the mean annual temperature (MAT) in Austria has risen by 2.9 °C since the pre-industrial period. Austria is experiencing accelerated warming, leading to more frequent and severe heat extremes, reduced snow cover, and glacier retreat (Chimani et al., 2024). Higher temperatures are associated with an increased evaporative demand leading to an elevation of the drought stress risk (Senf et al., 2020). In parallel, rising temperatures have also led to an elongation of the growing season of the main deciduous tree species. A longer period of water consumption during the growing period alongside increased evapotranspiration rates can exacerbate drought stress, especially in broad-leaved trees (Dolschak et al., 2019; Meier et al., 2021). Coniferous species - on the other hand - might in theory respond positively to rising winter temperatures, due to their capability to maintain photosynthesis (Larcher, 2000). Besides varying responses on the interspecific level, dendrochronological records also point to different responses within different geographic populations of the same species.

For example, Fagus sylvatica - the dominant tree species in Central Europe - shows a pronounced north-south gradient in growth trends. While northern populations benefit from longer growing seasons due to warming (Pretzsch et al., 2023), southern populations face declining growth due to increased drought stress (Martinez del Castillo et al., 2022). Quercus petraea has been assumed to be less vulnerable to climate stress - such as higher temperatures and drought - than Fagus sylvatica (Leuschner et al., 2024). However, in Austria, tree-ring widths of Quercus petraea and Quercus robur (Pedunculate oak) were significantly reduced by water deficits, with the strongest growth-climate correlations observed for the current-season (Feb.-Apr.) climatic water balance (Garamszegi et al., 2025). Also, Radaković and Stajić (2021) found that the radial growth of Quercus petraea in northeastern Serbia was strongly reliant on summer precipitation, particularly in June and July, with latewood and total ring width showing the clearest response; temperature had no significant effect. In a study by Kostić et al. (2022), tree-ring width, stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C), and intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) chronologies were developed for the period 1961–2000, focusing on two oak species - Quercus robur and Quercus cerris - in northwestern Serbia (Vojvodina province). The researchers examined the response of these species to meteorological data (temperature, precipitation, cloud cover), as well as drought events indicated by six meteorological drought indices and river water levels, to assess their drought tolerance and stress. The findings revealed that Quercus cerris exhibited better drought tolerance and lower drought stress compared to Quercus robur, evident through less negative δ1 3C values and lower iWUE.

Gadermaier et al. (2023) investigated the impact of soil water storage capacity and nutrient status on tree growth across 1562 forest sites in Styria, Austria. Their findings indicated that Quercus species - which are generally deep-rooting - significantly benefit from high water storage due to their access to deeper soil moisture, whereas shallow-rooting species like Picea abies rely more on upper soil layers. Considering the growth response of coniferous species. D’Andrea et al. (2023) found that the radial growth of Picea abies in Central Bohemia was primarily influenced by precipitation during the growing season, with little to no statistically significant correlation to temperature. This highlights the high sensitivity of Picea abies to drought - especially at lower elevations. Investigating Pinus nigra stands in a research area very close to the one in this work, Leal et al. (2008) reported a significant change in the sensitivity of tree growth rates to water availability in the late 20th century, with trees that were previously sensitive to spring-summer droughts showing reduced responsiveness. Tree-ring indices in the latter half of the 20th century exceeded expectations despite drought conditions, suggesting that water availability became less limiting to growth. This improvement was attributed to increased CO2 concentrations enhancing water-use efficiency in Pinus nigra in the Vienna basin, along with potential contributions from nitrogen deposition from the urban area improving nutrient availability. Overall, Pinus nigra is expected to benefit from climate change, with the potential to expand its habitat range towards the northeast (Klisz et al., 2023).

Climate projections for Lower Austria (ÖKS15; Chimani et al., 2016) indicate that - besides a projected rise in MAT - also mean annual precipitation (MAP) sums are likely to increase over the coming decades, with gains concentrated mainly in the dormant season (wetter winters). Summer precipitation is assumed to increase to a much smaller extent. Combined with rising potential evapotranspiration - driven by the projected temperature increase - it remains uncertain whether higher annual precipitation will compensate for elevated potential evapotranspiration, especially during critical early-summer periods. This uncertainty is particularly consequential in the Vienna Woods, which are located close to the eastern dry limit of Fagus sylvatica distribution (Bohn et al., 2007), where modest shifts in summer soil water availability could disproportionately affect the species’ performance and associated ecosystem services.

In this study, we focus on well-documented sites (Berger et al., 2016) and eight already well-established species (Winter Artusio et al., 2025) in the Vienna Woods, employing dendrochronological methods combined with water balance modelling to analyze their growth responses to changing climatic conditions. By modelling ring width as a function of meteorological growth factors, we aim to predict the future performance of these species under projected climate scenarios and state the three following hypotheses: (Hypothesis 1) Projected increases in MAP will not fully compensate for rising atmospheric evaporative demand, such that elevated transpiration demand will result in neutral to negative long-term effects on radial growth across most tree species. (Hypothesis 2) Seasonal conditions in the current growing season - especially June-July of the target year - explain more interannual variance in ring-width residuals than previous year conditions; moreover, within those key growing-season windows water availability is a stronger predictor of radial growth than air temperature. (Hypothesis 3) With the exception of Pinus nigra, coniferous species (Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris) will exhibit stronger negative responses to elevated summer temperature and reduced summer soil moisture than deciduous species (Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, Quercus cerris, Quercus petraea); among deciduous trees the Quercus species will display the most favorable response. This study aims to provide insights for local forest management. These findings might help improve management practices by identifying and promoting tree species that are more resilient to climate change, contributing to sustainable forest management in the Vienna Woods region.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Study area

The investigated forest plots are located in the Vienna Woods (Wienerwald), a lowland temperate forest region in close proximity to the City of Vienna, Austria (Fig. 1). The predominant bedrock is Flysch, a clay-rich marine sediment. Calcareous bedrock associated with the Northern Limestone Alps can be found in the southern part of the study area. The dominant soil types are Stagnosols and Cambisols (Schad, 2023). The elevation of the investigated plots ranges from 260 to 600 m above sea level. The mean annual precipitation varies between 600 and 900 mm, increasing from northeast to south-west. The mean annual temperature ranges from 8 to 10 °C depending on altitude. The dominant tree species in the investigated area is Fagus sylvatica. In autumn of 2022, 63 forest stands were sampled. In each stand Fagus sylvatica and co-occurring coniferous and deciduous species, i.e., Acer pseudoplatanus, Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus nigra, Pinus sylvestris, Quercus cerris and Quercus petraea (each with seven individuals per species and stand) were targeted for radial growth analysis. A detailed description of the investigated forest stand structure and metrics can be found in Winter Artusio et al. (2025) and Mayer et al. (2025).

Fig. 1. Research area in the Vienna Woods.

Fig. 1

(a) Location of the investigated sites in north-eastern eastern part of Austria. (b) All forest plots are located in the Vienna Woods. The gray outline indicates the municipal boundaries of Vienna. Out of 63 sites, eleven are situated within Vienna, while the remaining sites are located in Lower Austria. The blue line at the top represents the Danube River, while the blue line in the center marks the Wienfluss River along with one of its tributaries. The bedrock of the northerly part consists of Flysch sediment. Limestone forms the bedrock in the southerly part of the investigated area. All sites are beech stands, with different coniferous and deciduous species admixed.

2.2. Data sources

2.2.1. Tree-ring chronologies

Sixty-three sites were sampled in autumn of 2022, with seven trees per site and species being sampled. Two cores per tree were taken at breast height. The trees’ ages ranged from 50 to 250 years. The cores were prepared for dendrochronological analysis by slicing the cross sections with a sharp knife and scanning them at 1200 dpi using a calibrated Epson Expression 10000XL. Ring widths were measured with the WinDendro 2022 system (Regent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada). Cross-dating was performed using Rinntech TSAP-Win (Rinn, 2003) to ensure accurate ring dating, and COFECHA (Holmes, 1983) was used to evaluate measurement quality. Cores that could not be reliably cross-dated due to defects (e.g., rot, breakage, reaction wood) were excluded. Measured pith-offsets were used to estimate the trees’ age. The focal cross-dated period finally covered 90 years and extended from 1933 to 2023. Further details of the used methods are given by Winter Artusio et al. (2025).

Tree age has a strong influence on tree-ring width (Gadermaier et al., 2024). Annual tree-ring growth declined non-linearly with age, levelling off only for stands older than 200 years; the age trend was comparable across species. In that work, they set up a GAMS model (General Algebraic Modeling System; Bussieck and Meeraus, 2004) and used tree age as a parameter. In our work, we developed a species-specific model to directly remove the age component. The average ring width by age (wage) is calculated as:

wage=pnage+ps+wmin10k×ln(1+exp((pmage)×0.1)) (1)

The helper variable k is calculated as:

k=wminw50pm50 (2)

Parameters pn, ps, w50, and pm describe the shape of the transition of the age curve. wmin denotes the assumed minimum ring width.

The age-related component is then subtracted from the observed ring width (wobs). A remaining positive residual (wres) should correspond to favourable growing conditions and negative residuals to unfavourable environmental conditions.

wres=wobswage (3)

The model was fitted using nonlinear least squares (nls) function in Base R (R Core Team, 2024).

2.2.2. Meteorological data collection and processing

To analyze the influence of climatic factors on tree growth, meteorological data from multiple sources were compiled and processed, including both historical observations and future climate projections tailored to the study region.

For historical climate data, gridded daily temperature (minimum and maximum) and precipitation data from the Spartacus dataset (Hiebl and Frei, 2016) provided by GeoSphere Austria were used. The Spartacus dataset offers a 1 km × 1 km spatial resolution and covers the period from 1961 to present day. For this study, we set the temporal cut-off point to August 2025. Each forest stand was assigned to the corresponding grid cell in this dataset to obtain site-specific meteorological observations (minimum daily temperature, maximum daily temperature, daily precipitation sum). In addition, daily global radiation, wind speed, and relative humidity data were obtained from nearby meteorological stations (Wien-Mariabrunn, Wien-Hohe Warte) operated by GeoSphere Austria. These station-based measurements were used to extrapolate the data frame back to the year 1931 and to fill potential data gaps in the Spartacus dataset.

The Spartacus dataset does not offer information about global radiation. Instead, an estimate for the fraction of daytime sunshine is delivered. We used this value plus the calculated daylength (dependent on the day of the year plus geographical latitude) to derive an estimate from observed global radiation at the meteorological station Wien-Hohe Warte. A similar approach was applied to derive wind speed and relative humidity.

To model future climatic conditions and their effect on tree growth, climate projections were applied based on the ÖKS15 dataset (Chimani et al., 2016), which provides downscaled regional climate scenarios for northeastern Austria. Three climate scenarios were considered. A baseline (constant climate) scenario was created by looping historical meteorological data from the most recent 7305 days (20 years from January 2001 to December 2020) and repeating it from September 2025 to December 2100, maintaining stable climatic conditions over time. We intentionally excluded 2024 from the looped dataset because an extreme precipitation outlier in September 2024 could skew results. In addition to the baseline scenario, two climate change scenarios were used: RCP4.5 (representing a scenario with moderate greenhouse gas reductions) and RCP8.5 (a business-as-usual emission scenario). Both RCP scenarios project rising temperatures, with the warming trend being more pronounced in RCP8.5. Interestingly, besides rising temperatures, both scenarios’ projections also postulate an increase in precipitation. Seasonal adjustments were applied to daily precipitation and temperature. A seasonal multiplier was calculated to modify baseline precipitation values based on projected trends in the ÖKS15 dataset, while a seasonal offset was applied to the daily minimum and maximum temperatures to reflect expected warming trends (Fig. 2). This way, a continuous timeline of daily meteorological data was generated for each forest stand, covering the full modelling period from 1931 to 2100.

Fig. 2. Seasonal modifiers of air temperature and precipitation derived from the ÖKS15 scenarios.

Fig. 2

For the baseline climate extension, we utilize historic weather data from 2001 to 2020 to create a 20-year loop of daily weather records extending until the year 2100. For temperature, a seasonal offset is applied; daily precipitation is adjusted by being multiplied by a seasonal precipitation factor. In the ÖKS15 scenarios, it is posited that winter temperatures and winter precipitation are more significantly impacted by climate change than summer conditions. In the more extreme RCP8.5 scenario, it is projected that temperatures will increase by approximately 4° C by the end of the century, with a less pronounced rise in summer months (about 3° C). Additionally, for the RCP8.5 scenario, winter months are expected to see an increase in precipitation of around 20%, while only a 5% increase is anticipated for summer months.

2.3. Modelling

2.3.1. Fagus sylvatica phenology

To account for climate-change-induced shifts in the length of the growing season, we implemented the model presented by Dolschak et al. (2019), in which the onset of the growing season in Fagus sylvatica (leaf unfolding; LU; BBCH-11 according to Meier (2018) is modelled as the cumulative product of daily air temperature (above a threshold) and a daylength-dependent photoperiodic term (Blümel and Chmielewski, 2012). Leaf unfolding is triggered when the cumulative forcing exceeds a defined threshold.

The end of the growing season (leaf coloring; LC; BBCH-94 according to Meier (2018) is modelled using a temperature-based approach that considers two time-intervals: (i) late spring and (ii) late summer to early autumn. According to Estrella and Menzel (2006) lower temperatures in late spring and higher temperatures in late summer are associated with a delay in the end of the growing season. In our model, the temperature in the first interval has a negative effect on growing season length, whereas high temperatures during the second interval delay LC. The model was fitted to observations of BBCH-11 and BBCH-94 for Fagus sylvatica from the PEP725 database (Templ et al., 2018).

2.3.2. Water balance model

To assess tree growth factors derived from meteorological conditions, we set up a water balance model (WBM) for each forest stand. The WBM, which runs on a daily time step, uses standard meteorological data on a daily basis as input. Time series of minimum, mean and maximum temperature, the daily averages of relative humidity, global radiation, and wind speed at 2 m above ground, as well as the observed 24 h precipitation sum are required. In addition, information about phenological stages, e. g., the start and the end of the growing season is required. An exhaustive formulation of the WBM can be found in the appendix of Dolschak et al. (2019). The model was parameterized on a timeline of observed soil moisture at the Level II plot Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, located in the Vienna Woods (48.120 N, 16.047 E), at 510 m a.s.l. For a detailed site description see Neumann et al. (2001). The research site is a pure Fagus sylvatica stand, and shares soil characteristics with the forest stands, investigated in this work. Disregarding inter-site variability, the WBM was applied to all sites using the same parameterization as for the Klausen-Leopoldsdorf site. We consider the beech-derived parameterization justified because all stands are dominated by Fagus sylvatica. The fact that the study sites exhibit very uniform soil types (stagnic cambisols to stagnosols) further minimizes inter-site soil-hydraulic variability.

Accounting for local topographic influences, incoming daily global radiation was adjusted for each individual plot by incorporating information on slope and aspect, using the approach proposed by Tian et al. (2001). The model was run for historic conditions until the present day. For future conditions three climate change scenarios were applied, presented in Section 2.2.2.

2.3.3. Definition of growth factors

To quantify the influence of meteorological conditions on radial growth, a set of key environmental variables - referred to as growth factors - was defined: (i) mean temperature, representing the average air temperature over the respective period; (ii) actual transpiration sum, defined as the total amount of water lost through transpiration during the observed period, reflecting vegetation water use; (iii) climatic water balance, calculated as the difference between observed precipitation and actual modelled transpiration, providing a measure of net water availability; (iv) transpiration deficit sum, describing the difference between actual (modelled) and potential transpiration, with the latter estimated using the FAO Penman-Monteith equation (Allen et al., 1998), serving as an indicator of plant water stress; (v) average modelled soil moisture, representing the mean soil moisture content over the respective period; (vi) number of days with REW (relative extractable water) < 0.4, capturing periods of severe soil water stress; and (vii) number of days with REW < 0.7, indicating episodes of - at least - mild water stress. REW is defined as the relative soil moisture content (θ), scaled between 0 at the wilting point (θwp) and 1 at the soil’s water holding capacity (θhc).

REW=θθwpθhcθwp (4)

Following Granier et al. (1999), a threshold of 0.4 marks the onset of severe water deficit. In this work, we introduce a second threshold level of 0.7 corresponding to (at least) mild water deficit conditions. For both thresholds, we calculate the number of days on which the respective threshold was undershot in the designated period. All growth factors were standardized on a seasonal basis (mean = 0, standard deviation = 1) to enable direct comparison of the relative influence of each variable within the regression model.

Several cut-points in the definition of seasons were tested. The best results were achieved by splitting the growing season (here defined as April to September) into three blocks of two-month length. The remaining dormant season was split into two blocks of three-month length. Seasons were defined as the following periods: January to March, April to May, June to July, August to September, and October to December. In addition to the calculated growth factors of the current year (denoted as ‘act’), the influence of conditions from the previous year (‘-1’) and the year before that (‘-2’) were also considered. These temporal divisions allowed us to assess how both current and lagged climatic factors - such as calculated transpiration deficit and modelled soil moisture - affect the variation in the tree-ring width residual of the current year. We assume tree-ring growth is completed by the end of September; therefore, for the target year the period of consideration also ends in September.

2.3.4. Mixed effects modelling

To investigate the relationship between tree growth and climatic conditions, time series (1933–2022) of ring width residuals were calculated individually for each tree species and site (N = 7, per species and site), including eight tree species; Fagus sylvatica occurred at all 63 sites. The Vienna Woods are dominated by Fagus sylvatica stands. Hence, for some species it was hard to find enough sample trees. However, the number of sample trees in this work roughly reflects the fraction it makes up in the species distribution of the Vienna Woods. Acer pseudoplatanus was only present at one site, so only 7 trees could be probed. This is below a minimum of 12–15 sample trees per site advised by Cherubini et al. (2020). As it is hard to disentangle site- and climate effects, the results for this species must be interpreted with caution. All other species were present at - at least - 4 sites, yielding a minimum of 28 trees per species, making the results much more reliable.

Growth factors were calculated by season, site and year and subsequently standardized on a seasonal basis, to allow comparison of the effect strengths of the coefficients in the regression model. To avoid multicollinearity, a preselection step was applied, allowing only one growth factor per season from each of two categories: (1) water (transpiration sum, transpiration deficit, climatic water balance, mean soil moisture, days below REW ≤ 0.4 and REW ≤ 0.7), and (2) temperature (mean temperature).

Linear mixed-effects regression models (LME) were then fitted individually for each tree species, with site included as a random effect, to account for spatial variation. Model selection followed a stepwise variable removal approach, continuing until no further reduction in the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1973) was achieved. Statistical analyses and visualizations were conducted in R (R Core Team, 2024) using the ‘nlme’ package (Pinheiro and Bates, 2000). The final model was applied to climate change scenario data to assess effects of potential future growing conditions on radial growth of the studied tree species.

3. Results

3.1. Predictions of phenological changes

Phenological modelling indicates a lengthening of the growing season under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (Fig. 3). By 2081–2100, the growing season is projected to be approximately seven days longer under RCP4.5 and about fourteen days longer under RCP8.5 compared with the baseline. This change is driven by an earlier onset of leaf unfolding by roughly five days (RCP4.5) to ten days (RCP8.5) and a later senescence by about two days (RCP4.5) to four days (RCP8.5).

Fig. 3. Observed and modelled phenological changes.

Fig. 3

The model was fitted to an annual mean (green line) of observed single events (green dots) retrieved from the PEP725 database (Templ et al., 2018). Observed events display high interannual plasticity. Nevertheless, a clear trend to earlier onset and later end of the growing season is visible in the data (compare: Dolschak et al., 2019). Both climate change expansions point to an elongation of the growing season until the end of the century by about two weeks (compared to the baseline scenario), whereas the change is more pronounced at the beginning of the growing season. An elongation of the growing season might exacerbate the drought stress risk due to higher water consumption, mainly at the first half of the growing season.

3.2. Growth factors

Water balance modelling points to rising annual transpiration sums by ~21%, from approximately 290 to 350 mm until 2100 in the RCP8.5 scenario (Fig. 4). In our simulation, increased transpiration also leads to slightly drier soils. The transpiration effect is only partially mitigated by increased precipitation sums in the climate change scenarios. The annual climatic water balance displays only minor changes in the climate change scenarios until the end of the century. Rising annual precipitation sums in the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 projections are primarily driven by rising winter precipitation. The annual number of days with severe water stress (REW ≤ 0.4) is assumed to increase from 50 to 65 until the end of the century in the RCP8.5 scenario. Because our work suggests that growth conditions during June and July have the highest impact on ring formation, similar graphs are plotted in Fig. 5 for this specific season.

Fig. 4. Modelled annual growth factors for the investigated climate change scenarios.

Fig. 4

Growth factors, aggregated over the full year and displayed for 20-year periods. The baseline weather timeline from 2026 on consists of looped data from 2001 to 2020. Therefore, no changes are visible in the future timeframe from 2026 to 2100. In the RCP8.5 scenario, increased transpiration causes average soil moisture to decrease, leading to more severe water stress (indicated by a rise in days with REW ≤ 0.4) that increases from approximately 50 to 70 days per year compared to the baseline scenario. These effects are less pronounced in the RCP4.5 scenario. Drought stress is partially mitigated by increased annual precipitating sums in the climate change scenarios.

Fig. 5. Modelled growth factors for season June - July for the investigated climate change scenarios.

Fig. 5

The period from June to July is deemed critical for tree ring formation. Elevated temperatures in the climate change scenarios contribute to increased transpiration sums, depleting soil moisture, therefore exacerbating water stress, as indicated by an increase in days of severe water stress (REW ≤ 0.4) from an average of 18 (baseline) to 30 days (RCP8.5) - nearly half of the days within this two-month period. In contrast to rising winter precipitation sums, summer precipitation levels exhibit only a minor increase in the climate change scenarios, resulting in, only minimal mitigation effects from higher rainfall.

3.3. Age-width relationship

The age-width model was fitted to the average age dependency of tree-ring width per tree species utilizing the ‘nls’ procedure (Fig. 6). The corresponding optimised parameter values are displayed in Table 1. Overall, the model fit (adjusted r2) ranged between 0.90 and 0.98, except being 0.28 for Acer pseudoplatanus. This somehow poor fit can be attributed to the small sample size (n = 7). The tree species was only present on one forest site. Therefore, all results for Acer pseudoplatanus must be interpreted with caution.

Fig. 6. Observed and modelled relationship between tree age and ring width.

Fig. 6

Growth patterns vary during tree maturation. The coloured lines denote the observed average ring width for a given age, while the dashed line represents the species-specific model fit. We postulate that the residuals between the modelled and observed values depict the portion of ring width influenced by site-specific factors and local environmental conditions, such as weather conditions and drought periods.

Table 1. Optimized parameters for the age-width relationship.

pn, ps,w50, and pm describe the shape of the transition of the age-width relation curve. wmin denotes the assumed minimum ring width (see Section 2.2.1). N corresponds to the number of distinct ages (years) in the modelling of the age width relationship. Width was modelled on one assembled age timeline for each species. The low r2 value for Acer pseudoplatanus can be explained by the low number of seven sampled trees.

Species p n p s w 50 w min p m N r2 adj. r2
Acer pseudoplatanus   1.5 0.00 1.1 0.7 218.5 127 0.31 0.28
Fagus sylvatica   2.3 0.00 1.7 0.9 218.5 203 0.96 0.96
Larix decidua 25.3 0.00 1.0 0.5 141.3 177 0.97 0.97
Picea abies   9.0 0.00 1.9 0.9   92.0 114 0.93 0.93
Pinus nigra 14.6 0.00 1.0 0.7 151.6 194 0.90 0.90
Pinus sylvestris 22.2 0.00 1.1 0.3 121.5 149 0.98 0.98
Quercus cerris   9.9 3.23 1.6 1.0 112.0 164 0.90 0.90
Quercus petraea 13.8 2.21 1.3 0.9 143.2 196 0.96 0.96

3.4. Tree-ring residual modelling

Fig. 7 illustrates the relationship between seasonal growth factors and tree-ring residuals, displayed along the x-axis (seasons) and y-axis (growth factors). Each point on the graph represents a combination of growth factors and corresponding seasons, which are then input into the mixed effects model. The growth conditions in the current year, particularly in the season from June to July, had the most significant impact on ring width, indicated in darkest coloring of the tiles in Fig. 7, across all tree species and possible predictors. As anticipated, the correlations were much stronger in the summer months compared to other times of the year. Among all species, soil moisture showed a consistent positive correlation with growth, highlighting the critical role of water availability for forest productivity. Conversely, temperature had a negative effect, and higher temperatures were linked to reduced ring widths in the target year. This trend was contrasted by Quercus cerris, where radial growth exhibited a positive correlation with dormant season temperature from October to March.

Fig. 7. Correlation between seasonal growth factor and ring width residual.

Fig. 7

Growth factors were aggregated site-wisely and seasonally and calculated for (‘act’) the target year (year of tree ring formation), (‘-1’) the previous year, and (‘-2’) the year before that, as past conditions might also influence current growth. Seasonal periods were defined as follows: January to March, April to May, June to July, August to September, and October to December. Given that tree ring development is presumed to be complete by the end of September, the analysis timeframe for the target year also concludes with September. Subsequently, Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between the ring residuals and the growth factors. Blue fields indicate a positive correlation between the growth factor and the residual, while red fields indicate a negative correlation. The more intense the colour, the stronger the correlation. Across all tree species, it becomes evident that the growth conditions in the current year, especially during the growing season of June to July, exert the strongest influence on ring width. As expected, the correlations are significantly more pronounced during the summer months than outside the growing season. Soil moisture consistently correlates positively with growth, underscoring the importance of water availability for forest productivity. In contrast, temperature exhibits an opposite effect: warmer conditions are associated with smaller ring widths in the target year. Quercus cerris is the only exception here: Increased temperatures, especially during the period outside the growing season, lead to wider growth rings. This indicates a possible suitability concerning a warming climate.

In Fig. 8, the remaining predictors in the mixed effects model are displayed. Models with fewer data points contained fewer predictors. For instance, Acer pseudoplatanus was only present at a single site with a 90-year timeline (90 data points), resulting in a model with just two predictors. In contrast, Fagus sylvatica was observed across all 63 sites, allowing for a more complex model structure with additional predictors. Species specific model performance is given in Table 2. Optimized predictor values for all species are listed in Table 3. Fig. 9 displays a comparison of observed and modelled annual mean ring width chronologies for all tree species. Our modelling approach offered a good fit for the observed temporal dynamics of tree-ring width, with r2 values ranging from 0.35 (Acer pseudoplatanus) to 0.70 (Pinus nigra).

Fig. 8. Remaining predictors in the mixed effects model.

Fig. 8

Growth factors were standardized for direct comparison of coefficient strength. The model was simplified by sequentially removing climatic predictors until further AIC reduction was no longer possible. Models with fewer data points had fewer predictors. For example, Acer pseudoplatanus was present only at a single site with a timeline of 90 years (90 data points), resulting in a model with only two predictors. In contrast, Fagus sylvatica was observed across all 63 sites, allowing for a more complex model structure with additional predictors. Predictors for all species can be viewed in Table 3. Stepwise variable reduction for Acer pseudoplatanus (single site, 90 yearly observations) lead two predictors remaining: (1) June-July climatic water balance of the year prior to ring formation, and (2) June-July drought days of the current year. Fagus sylvatica was observed across all 63 sites allowing for a more complex model structure with 13 growth factors as predictors. Most important were conditions in June – July of the year of ring formation. Temperature had a negative and soil moisture a positive effect on ring formation. Soil moisture (from Jan. to Jul.) in the year of ring formation had a positive effect on growth.

Table 2. Used data and performance of the LME model.

Marginal r2 represents the portion of r2 which can be explained by fixed effects (growth factors) only. Conditional r2 comprises also the random effects (site) part. As Acer pseudoplatanus was only present at one site, the value for conditional r2 is not meaningful and therefore excluded. Due to reasons of consistency, Acer pseudoplatanus’ marginal r2 is calculated analogous as for the other species.

Species N sites Start End N years marg. r2 cond. r2
Acer pseudoplatanus 1 1933 2022 90 0.30
Fagus sylvatica 63 1933 2022 90 0.19 0.48
Larix decidua 13 1933 2021 89 0.24 0.40
Picea abies 5 1933 2021 89 0.23 0.35
Pinus nigra 6 1933 2021 89 0.20 0.70
Pinus sylvestris 4 1933 2021 89 0.19 0.46
Quercus cerris 12 1933 2021 89 0.10 0.55
Quercus petraea 26 1933 2022 90 0.06 0.60

Table 3. Predictors of the LME model for all examined tree species.

Species Growth Factor Season Est. P
Acer pseudoplatanus Climatic W.B. Jun, Jul (-1) 0.07787 0.00285
Acer pseudoplatanus Days below REW 0.4 Jun, Jul (act.) -0.15272 0.00000
Acer pseudoplatanus Intercept -0.05678 0.44713
Fagus sylvatica Mean Temp. Apr, May, (-2) -0.03708 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Climatic W.B. Oct - Dec (-2) -0.06630 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (-1) 0.01716 0.00021
Fagus sylvatica Days below REW 0.7 Apr, May, (-1) -0.08133 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Days below REW 0.4 Aug, Sep (-1) -0.04896 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Climatic W.B. Oct - Dec (-1) -0.07195 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Mean Soil Moisture Jan - Mar (act.) 0.04464 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (act.) 0.04593 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Mean Soil Moisture Apr, May, (act.) 0.09575 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Mean Soil Moisture Jun, Jul (act.) 0.09289 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Mean Temp. Jun, Jul (act.) -0.09922 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Days below REW 0.4 Aug, Sep (act.) -0.02148 0.00026
Fagus sylvatica Mean Temp. Aug, Sep (act.) 0.07332 0.00000
Fagus sylvatica Intercept 0.09740 0.00947
Larix decidua Days below REW 0.4 Aug, Sep (-2) -0.03861 0.00006
Larix decidua Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (-1) 0.03328 0.00020
Larix decidua Mean Temp. Apr, May, (-1) -0.06973 0.00000
Larix decidua Days below REW 0.7 Jun, Jul (-1) -0.04076 0.00141
Larix decidua Mean Temp. Jun, Jul (-1) -0.06490 0.00000
Larix decidua Transpiration Deficit Aug, Sep (-1) -0.05817 0.00001
Larix decidua Transpiration Deficit Oct - Dec (-1) -0.03364 0.00068
Larix decidua Mean Temp. Oct - Dec (-1) 0.04852 0.00009
Larix decidua Mean Soil Moisture Jun, Jul (act.) 0.08654 0.00000
Larix decidua Intercept -0.03972 0.43233
Picea abies Climatic W.B. Jun, Jul (-2) 0.06467 0.00305
Picea abies Climatic W.B. Oct - Dec (-2) -0.07969 0.00000
Picea abies Mean Temp. Jun, Jul (-1) -0.09051 0.00044
Picea abies Mean Soil Moisture Aug, Sep (-1) 0.07322 0.00047
Picea abies Climatic W.B. Oct - Dec (-1) -0.04843 0.00331
Picea abies Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (act.) 0.07482 0.00032
Picea abies Mean Soil Moisture Jun, Jul (act.) 0.14294 0.00000
Picea abies Intercept -0.09007 0.33502
Pinus nigra Transpiration Deficit Oct - Dec (-2) -0.04509 0.00001
Pinus nigra Mean Soil Moisture Jan - Mar (-1) -0.02844 0.00064
Pinus nigra Climatic W.B. Jun, Jul (-1) 0.06264 0.00000
Pinus nigra Mean Temp. Aug, Sep (-1) -0.07415 0.00000
Pinus nigra Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (act.) 0.06290 0.00000
Pinus nigra Climatic W.B. Jun, Jul (act.) 0.11236 0.00000
Pinus nigra Mean Temp. Jun, Jul (act.) -0.03799 0.00225
Pinus nigra Intercept 0.06780 0.60535
Pinus sylvestris Mean Temp. Apr, May, (-1) -0.05677 0.00000
Pinus sylvestris Days below REW 0.7 Aug, Sep (-1) -0.03525 0.00044
Pinus sylvestris Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (act.) 0.05996 0.00000
Pinus sylvestris Transp. Sum Apr, May, (act.) -0.08309 0.00000
Pinus sylvestris Climatic W.B. Jun, Jul (act.) 0.06759 0.00000
Pinus sylvestris Intercept -0.02137 0.79019
Quercus cerris Mean Temp. Oct - Dec (-2) 0.04738 0.00000
Quercus cerris Days below REW 0.4 Aug, Sep (-1) -0.02742 0.00066
Quercus cerris Transpiration Deficit Oct - Dec (-1) -0.02638 0.00058
Quercus cerris Mean Temp. Oct - Dec (-1) 0.04716 0.00000
Quercus cerris Mean Temp. Apr, May, (act.) -0.05749 0.00000
Quercus cerris Mean Soil Moisture Jun, Jul (act.) 0.06259 0.00000
Quercus cerris Mean Temp. Jun, Jul (act.) -0.04537 0.00014
Quercus cerris Mean Temp. Aug, Sep (act.) 0.06196 0.00000
Quercus cerris Intercept 0.03516 0.65008
Quercus petraea Transpiration Deficit Apr, May, (-2) -0.02077 0.00034
Quercus petraea Mean Temp. Jun, Jul (-2) -0.04490 0.00000
Quercus petraea Days below REW 0.7 Jan - Mar (-1) 0.01712 0.00004
Quercus petraea Mean Temp. Jan - Mar (-1) 0.02034 0.00005
Quercus petraea Mean Temp. Oct - Dec (-1) 0.03834 0.00000
Quercus petraea Transp. Sum Apr, May, (act.) -0.02526 0.00014
Quercus petraea Mean Soil Moisture Jun, Jul (act.) 0.07746 0.00000
Quercus petraea Days below REW 0.4 Aug, Sep (act.) -0.02133 0.00019
Quercus petraea Intercept 0.09332 0.13395

Fig. 9. Observed and modelled (baseline climate) annual ring width residual for 8 tree species.

Fig. 9

The coloured lines represent observed (green) and modelled (blue) annual mean values. The green and blue ribbons represent the 25 and 75% percentiles of oberserved and modelled ring width residuals. The LME model offers a good fit for the temporal dynamic of the annual mean with r2 values ranging from 0.35 (Acer pseudoplatanus) to 0.70 (Pinus nigra).

Below we describe the climate sensitivity and projected behavior of radial growth of the tree species in alphabetical order.

For Acer pseudoplatanus the final model retained only two predictors: (i) The climatic water balance during June and July of the year preceding ring formation, and (ii) the number of drought days in June and July of the current growth year (Fig. 8). All other climatic predictors were excluded during model selection. Our simulation points towards a moderate decline of the mean annual ring width residual for the far future (2081–2100) of –0.14 mm (RCP8.5 scenario vs baseline; Fig. 10).

Fig. 10. Annual ring width residuals for eight tree species.

Fig. 10

All species, except one, show a decline in average ring width residuals in the climate change scenarios by the century’s end. For the period 2081–2100, growth declines in the RCP8.5 scenario (compared to baseline) are as follows: Pinus nigra: −0.29 mm, Larix decidua: −0.27 mm, Picea abies: −0.26 mm, Pinus sylvestris: −0.21 mm, Fagus sylvatica: −0.15 mm, Acer pseudoplatanus: −0.14 mm and Quercus petraea: −0.09 mm. Notably, Quercus cerris demonstrates a slight increase of approximately +0.12 mm in average ring width residuals by century’s end in the RCP8.5 scenario, mainly due to positive responses to higher temperatures during late summer of the actual year, and late autumn of the preceding years.

Fagus sylvatica was present across all 63 sites allowing for a more complex model structure with 13 growth-factors as predictors (Fig. 8). In this work, Fagus sylvatica was most strongly impacted by current year climatic conditions, particularly those of June to July of the year of ring formation (compare Fig. 5). Current-year temperature had a negative and soil moisture (from January to July) a positive effect on radial growth. In our work, predicted higher temperatures in June and July and decreased soil moisture from April to July are mainly responsible for a modelled moderate decline in ring width (-0.15 mm) in the RCP8.5 scenario (in comparison with the baseline scenario) till the end of the century (Fig. 10).

Larix decidua was sensitive to soil moisture levels - especially in June and July of the year of ring formation (Fig. 8). Also, there was a negative response to April to July temperature of the year before ring formation. Our long-term predictions reveal a distinct decline of annual ring width, especially for the far future (2081 – 2100) in the RCP8.5 scenario (-0.21 mm; Fig. 10).

Picea abies showed strong response to high soil moisture and low temperature in June and July of the year of ring formation (Fig. 8). We project a growth decline of −0.26 mm per annum until the end of the century (RCP8.5 vs. baseline; Fig. 10).

Pinus nigra showed reduced radial growth with a decline of the climatic water balance during June and July of the current and previous summers (Fig. 8). Our study indicates that Pinus nigra exhibits the most significant projected growth decline of all investigated species, with an average growth reduction of −0.29 mm by the end of the century (Fig. 10).

Pinus sylvestris was highly sensitive to drought, with significant responses to current year summer precipitation (July and August; Fig. 8). We model an average decline of the ring width residual of −0.21 mm until the end of this century (Fig. 10).

In our LME approach Quercus cerris exhibited a positive growth response to late summer and autumn temperatures (Fig. 8), making it the only species reacting positively to climate change (+0.12 mm per annum at the end of the century in the RCP8.5 scenario; Fig. 10). Quercus petraea was modelled with a minor decline of the mean residual width of – 0.09 mm.

4. Discussion

4.1. Predictions of phenological changes

For LU in Fagus sylvatica Wang et al. (2022) estimated an earlier onset of the growing season by 6.8 and 9 days (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) until the end of the century. Their estimates lie well in the range of our predictions for LU (Fig. 3). The earlier onset of the growing season is expected to exacerbate water consumption at the beginning of this period, thereby increasing the drought risk, mainly in the first half of the growing season.

4.2. Growth factors

Water balance modelling points to rising annual transpiration sums by ~21%, until 2100 in the RCP8.5 scenario (Fig. 4). This result is comparable to prediction results reported by Misson et al. (2002): For Central European Fagus sylvatica forests in Belgium they reported a ~17% increase in transpiration, until the end of the 21st century, which in their study was associated with a temperature rise of ~2.8 °C. In our simulation, increased transpiration also leads to slightly drier soils: The transpiration effect is only partially mitigated by increased precipitation sums in the climate change scenarios, supporting hypothesis 1. Rising annual precipitation sums are primarily driven by rising winter precipitation. According to Haslinger et al. (2023) the climatic water balance may experience moderate increases during winter and spring, however, drought risk is expected to escalate in summer months.

4.3. Tree-ring residual modelling

Evaluating oxygen isotope ratios (δ18O) in tree-ring cellulose of Acer pseudoplatanus Battipaglia et al. (2008) demonstrated that this species is highly sensitive to spring precipitation, suggesting high vulnerability to current year water deficit. Our simulation points towards relevance of water availability during June and July of the actual year (number of drought days) and the year preceding ring formation (climatic water balance) current growth year (Fig. 8), pointing towards a moderate future decline of radial growth.

Radial growth of Fagus sylvatica was shown to be strongly linked to leaf photosynthesis, with the steepest increase of ring growth from May to June when the canopy reaches their maximum leaf mass area and photosynthetic rate (Čufar et al., 2008; Michelot et al., 2012). At a typical forest site in Slovenia, ring formation of Fagus sylvatica was also negatively affected by August maximum temperatures and positively affected by May and July precipitation (Čufar et al., 2008). In our work, predicted higher temperatures in June and July and decreased soil moisture from April to July (Fig. 8) are mainly responsible for the modelled future decline in radial growth.

Using the same dendrochronological database as this study, Winter Artusio et al. (2025) described Larix decidua as a tree species with favourable performance regarding drought stress resistance, resilience and recovery from drought years. This was due to the observed growth decline during the drought year being overcompensated in subsequent periods. Their approach evaluated growth performance (tree-ring width) in drought years in comparison to years before and after the event for four drought periods in the last 90 years. The observed post drought growth overcompensation of Larix decidua may be indirectly linked to the simultaneously observed growth depression of Fagus sylvatica: The species transpires substantially more during the growing season than admixed conifers (Berger et al., 2006), so a post-drought growth depression in Fagus sylvatica and the associated reduction in water uptake could increase soil water availability and thereby promote compensatory growth in Larix decidua. In contrast to current behaviour of Larix decidua, our long-term predictions show a distinct decline of annual ring width, especially for the far future (Fig. 10).

Our projections for Picea abies indicate a substantial decline in radial growth through the end of the century (Fig. 10), a result that aligns with recent literature. Declines at low and mid elevations are mainly driven by higher temperatures and reduced, more unevenly distributed, precipitation that increase summer soil water deficits (D’Andrea et al., 2023). The species’ shallow rooting - roughly 80% of fine roots in the upper 20–25 cm - renders it especially vulnerable to topsoil drying (Rosengren et al., 2006), and drought-weakened stands are more prone to secondary attacks by the spruce bark beetle (Dudík et al., 2021).

Our study indicates that Pinus nigra exhibits the most significant projected growth decline of all investigated species, with an average growth reduction of −0.29 mm by the end of the century (Fig. 10). We formulated hypothesis 3 that among coniferous species Pinus nigra exhibits the most favorable response regarding climate change. Our findings do not support that statement. The observed poor performance of Pinus nigra might be the result of two interacting factors: chronic drought stress and tip blight caused by the fungus Diplodia sapinea. The fungus can live symptomless as an endophyte or saprobe and become pathogenic under warm, wet spring conditions followed by summer drought, preferentially attacking trees already weakened by drought and thereby amplifying climate-driven decline (Schwanda et al., 2022).

According to Brichta et al. (2024), the growth of Pinus sylvestris is more sensitive to temperature than to total precipitation. In our work the species’ growth response was sensitive to the climatic water balance, transpiration sums, air temperature and days below REW 0.7 (Fig. 8). We modelled declining radial growth until the end of this century (Fig. 10). This projected decrease is consistent with observed dieback and a possible range contraction of Pinus sylvestris in parts of Central Europe (Klisz et al., 2023), and reflects both reductions in summer water availability and increased temperatures.

In Europe, the broad-leaved forests of lowland areas and lower elevations are predominantly dominated by two deciduous oak species: Quercus petraea and Quercus robur. While extensive research has focused on the climate-growth relationships of these species across various European regions, Quercus cerris, which frequently coexist and form mixed stands with the latter two, remains under-researched from a dendroclimatological perspective (Mészáros et al., 2022). Quercus petraea and Quercus cerris, both have been described as drought-tolerant species (Kunz et al., 2018). Móricz et al., (2021) found that for three Hungarian forest sites Quercus petraea and Quercus cerris, both heavily depend on summer water availability for radial growth. However, Quercus cerris shows greater drought sensitivity but higher recovery potential, while Quercus petraea displays lower growth plasticity and slower post-drought recovery. These contrasting strategies suggest Quercus cerris may gain competitive advantage under increasing drought stress (Winter Artusio et al., 2025).

Our study demonstrated clear differences in the climate sensitivity of Quercus cerris and Quercus petraea, suggesting that Quercus cerris may be better equipped for the anticipated climate change. It is the only species exhibiting a positive growth response to late summer and autumn temperatures (Fig. 8), making it the only species reacting positively to climate change (+0.12 mm per annum at the end of the century in the RCP8.5 scenario; Fig. 10). Quercus petraea displayed only a minor reduction in radial growth, making it the species with the second-best suitability for climate change conditions (Fig. 10).

Our results strongly support hypothesis 2: model selection consistently identified current-year June-July conditions as the dominant drivers of interannual variability in ring-width residuals across species, and within that window water-related variables such as soil moisture, climatic water balance and water-stress day counts were the most consistently predictors. Temperature in the target season tended to have negative effects. While previous-year conditions did influence growth in the simulations, their explanatory power was generally lower than that of current growing-season June-July factors.

Hypothesis 3 is supported in broad terms: most conifers in our study (Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris, Larix decidua) show stronger negative responses to elevated summer temperature and reduced summer soil moisture than the deciduous species, and - within deciduous trees - the Quercus species perform comparatively well. However, the specific expectation that Pinus nigra would be the relatively favourable conifer is not supported: Pinus nigra exhibits the largest projected decline. This exception highlights that species-level vulnerability cannot be inferred from climate tolerances alone; biotic threats, such as pathogenic fungi or bark beetles that preferentially attack already drought-stressed trees, might strongly affect the trees’ future performance.

5. Conclusion

In the future, the Vienna Woods are assumed to experience more frequent climatic extremes, such as heat waves and droughts, exacerbating the climatic pressure on the functioning of forest ecosystems. In our simulation, soils are predicted to become drier. The projected rise of MAP in the climate change scenarios does not fully compensate for the increased transpirative demand due to rising temperatures. Almost all investigated species are predicted to respond negatively to the projected climate conditions. For the far future (2081–2100) of the RCP8.5 scenario, average declines in the annual tree ring width residual (compared to baseline) are ranked as follows: Pinus nigra: −0.29 mm, Larix decidua: −0.27 mm, Picea abies: −0.26 mm, Pinus sylvestris: −0.21 mm, Fagus sylvatica: −0.15 mm, Acer pseudoplatanus: −0.14 mm, Quercus petraea: −0.09 mm and Quercus cerris: +0.12 mm. These findings clearly indicate that coniferous species are likely to exhibit greater vulnerability to climate change than deciduous species. The investigated oak species are displaying the most favorable response. Of all tree species tested, Quercus cerris was exceptional in exhibiting a predicted small increase in future radial growth attributed to a favorable response to higher temperatures during the late summer and the preceding autumn. This study assessed the current and future climate sensitivities of long-established tree species in the Vienna Woods. Local forest management - which is already setting the focus on the Quercus genus - should specifically consider the advantages that Quercus cerris might display over Quercus petraea to increase the overall resilience and sustainability of regional forest ecosystems in the face of climate change.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Regions and Water Management of the Republic of Austria (WF-Research project, number 101725, ‘WiwaKonKlim’), granted to T. W.B. We thank the Municipal Department 23 (Economy, Labor and Statistics) of the City of Vienna for releasing K.D. part-time in order to work within this project. We thank Leopold Lindebner who installed the forest study sites in 1984. Selina Türtscher provided additional field data within a survey of these sites in 2012 (funded by the Austrian Science Fund, FWF, project number P23861-B16, granted to T.W.B.). We thank the forest owners (Austrian Federal Forests ÖBf AG, City of Vienna, Klosterneuburg Monastery and Abbey of Heiligenkreuz) for the possibility to perform this research on their properties. Finally, we thank three excellent reviewers for their critical comments for the improvement of this paper.

Footnotes

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Klaus Dolschak: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis. Emilia Winter Artusio: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Mathias Mayer: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. Michael Grabner: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Data curation. Michael Tatzber: Resources, Data curation. Iftekhar U. Ahmed: Resources, Data curation. Elisabeth Wächter: Resources, Data curation. Isolde K. Berger: Resources, Data curation. Pétra Berger: Resources, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Wolfgang Wanek: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology. Torsten W. Berger: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT to translate sentences and rephrase short sections. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle; Proc Second Int Symp Inf Theory; 1973. pp. 267–281. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper No. 56 (others) Rome Food Agric Organ U Nations. 1998;56:e156 [Google Scholar]
  3. Battipaglia G, Jäggi M, Saurer M, Siegwolf RT, Cotrufo MF. Climatic sensitivity of δ18O in the wood and cellulose of tree rings: Results from a mixed stand of Acer pseudoplatanus L. and Fagus sylvatica L. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2008;261:193–202. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger TW, Swoboda S, Prohaska T, Glatzel G. The role of calcium uptake from deep soils for spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) For Ecol Manag. 2006;229:234–246. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berger TW, Türtscher S, Berger P, Lindebner L. A slight recovery of soils from Acid Rain over the last three decades is not reflected in the macro nutrition of beech (Fagus sylvatica) at 97 forest stands of the Vienna Woods. Environ Pollut. 2016;216:624–635. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blümel K, Chmielewski F-M. Shortcomings of classical phenological forcing models and a way to overcome them. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2012;164:10–19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bohn U, Zazanashvili N, Nakhutsrishvili G, Ketskhoveli N. The Map of the Natural Vegetation of Europe and its application in the Caucasus Ecoregion. Bull Georgian Natl Acad Sci. 2007;175:112–121. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brichta J, Šimůnek V, Bílek L, Vacek Z, Gallo J, Drozdowski S, Bravo-Fernández JA, Mason B, Gomez Roig, Hájek V, et al. Effects of climate change on scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth across Europe: decrease of tree-ring fluctuation and amplification of climate stress. Forests. 2024;15:91. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bussieck MR, Meeraus A. Modeling Languages in Mathematical Optimization. Springer; 2004. General algebraic modeling system (GAMS) pp. 137–157. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cherubini P, Gargano A, Grob M, Nievergelt D, Passardi S. Dendrochronologia’s tutoring recipes: How to take samples for small basic dendroecological studies. Dendrochronologia. 2020;64:125774 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chimani B, Heinrich G, Hofstätter M, Kerschbaumer M, Kienberger S, Leuprecht A, Lexer A, Peßenteiner S, Poetsch M, Salzmann M, et al. ÖKS15–Klimaszenarien für Österreich. Daten, Methoden und Klimaanalyse; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chimani B, Koch R, Tilg A, Ganekind M, Günther D, Rohrböck A, Seitner V, Greilinger M, Olefs M. Bestimmung der aktuellen Klimaerwärmung für Österreich. CCCA Factsheet. 2024;50 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. Čufar K, Prislan P, De Luis M, Gričar J. Tree-ring variation, wood formation and phenology of beech (Fagus sylvatica) from a representative site in Slovenia, SE Central Europe. Trees. 2008;22:749–758. [Google Scholar]
  15. D’Andrea G, Šimůnek V, Pericolo O, Vacek Z, Vacek S, Corleto R, Olejár L, Ripullone F. Growth response of Norway Spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in central Bohemia (Czech Republic) to climate change. Forests. 2023;14:1215 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dolschak K, Gartner K, Berger TW. The impact of rising temperatures on water balance and phenology of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands. Model earth Syst Environ. 2019;5:1347–1363. doi: 10.1007/s40808-019-00602-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dudík R, Palátová P, Jarský V. Restoration of Declining Spruce Stands in the Czech Republic: a Bioeconomic View on Use of Silver Birch in Case of Small Forest Owners. Austrian J For Sci/Cent F üR Das Gesamt Forstwes. 2021;138 [Google Scholar]
  18. Estrella N, Menzel A. Responses of leaf colouring in four deciduous tree species to climate and weather in Germany. Clim Res. 2006;32:253–267. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gadermaier J, Wächter E, Grabner M, Vospernik S, Katzensteiner K. On the role of soil water storage capacity and soil nutrients on tree growth of selected tree species in Central Europe; EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts; 2023. EGU-11606 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gadermaier J, Vospernik S, Grabner M, Wächter E, Keßler D, Kessler M, Lehner F, Klebinder K, Katzensteiner K. Soil water storage capacity and soil nutrients drive tree ring growth of six European tree species across a steep environmental gradient. For Ecol Manag. 2024;554:121599 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garamszegi B, Grabner M, Vospernik S, Gadermaier J, Waechter E, Lehner F, Katzensteiner K. Scaling dendroecological studies on oaks combining different sampling schemes along a regional climatic gradient. Agric For Meteorol. 2025;368:110554 [Google Scholar]
  22. Granier A, Breda N, Biron P, Villette S. A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands. Ecol Model. 1999;116:269–283. [Google Scholar]
  23. Haslinger K, Schöner W, Abermann J, Laaha G, Andre K, Olefs M, Koch R. Apparent contradiction in the projected climatic water balance for Austria: wetter conditions on average versus higher probability of meteorological droughts. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2023;23:2749–2768. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hiebl J, Frei C. Daily temperature grids for Austria since 1961 - concept, creation and applicability. Theor Appl Climatol. 2016;124:161–178. [Google Scholar]
  25. Holmes RL. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. 1983 [Google Scholar]
  26. Klisz M, Puchałka R, Jakubowski M, Koprowski M, Netsvetov M, Prokopuk Y, Jevšenak J. Local site conditions reduce interspecific differences in climate sensitivity between native and non-native pines. Agric For Meteorol. 2023;341:109694 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kostić S, Levanič T, Orlović S, Matović B, Stojanović DB. Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) is more drought tolerant and better reflects climate variations compared to pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) in lowland mixed forests in northwestern Serbia: A stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) and radial growth approach. Ecol Indic. 2022;142:109242 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kunz J, Löffler G, Bauhus J. Minor European broadleaved tree species are more drought-tolerant than Fagus sylvatica but not more tolerant than Quercus petraea. For Ecol Manag. 2018;414:15–27. [Google Scholar]
  29. Larcher W. Temperature stress and survival ability of Mediterranean sclerophyllous plants. Plant Biosyst. 2000;134:279–295. [Google Scholar]
  30. Leal S, Eamus D, Grabner M, Wimmer R, Cherubini P. Tree rings of Pinus nigra from the Vienna basin region (Austria) show evidence of change in climatic sensitivity in the late 20th century. Can J For Res. 2008;38:744–759. [Google Scholar]
  31. Leuschner C, Fuchs S, Wedde P, Rüther E, Schuldt B. A multi-criteria drought resistance assessment of temperate Acer, Carpinus, Fraxinus, Quercus, and Tilia species. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2024;62:125777 [Google Scholar]
  32. Martinez del Castillo E, Zang CS, Buras A, Hacket-Pain A, Esper J, Serrano-Notivoli R, Hartl C, Weigel R, Klesse S, Resco de Dios V. Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests (others) Commun Biol. 2022;5:163. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03107-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mayer M, Dolschak K, Winter Artusio E, Grabner M, Tatzber M, Ahmed IU, Wächter E, Türtscher S, Lindebner L, Berger IK, Berger P, et al. Substantial deep-soil carbon losses outweigh topsoil gains in European beech forests since the 1980s. Glob Change Biol. 2025;31:e70446. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier M, Vitasse Y, Bugmann H, Bigler C. Phenological shifts induced by climate change amplify drought for broad-leaved trees at low elevations in Switzerland. Agric For Meteorol. 2021;307:108485 [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier U. Entwicklungsstadien mono-und dikotyler Pflanzen. Phänologische Entwicklungsstadien mono-und dikotyler Pflanzen. 2018 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mészáros I, Adorján B, Nyitrai B, Kanalas P, Oláh V, Levanič T. Long-term radial growth and climate-growth relationships of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus cerris L. in a xeric low elevation site from Hungary. Dendrochronologia. 2022;76:126014 [Google Scholar]
  37. Michelot A, Simard S, Rathgeber C, Dufrêne E, Damesin C. Comparing the intra-annual wood formation of three European species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris) as related to leaf phenology and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics. Tree Physiol. 2012;32:1033–1045. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Misson L, Rasse DP, Vincke C, Aubinet M, François L. Predicting transpiration from forest stands in Belgium for the 21st century. Agric For Meteorol. 2002;111:265–282. [Google Scholar]
  39. Móricz N, Illés G, Mészáros I, Garamszegi B, Berki I, Bakacsi Z, Kámpel J, Szabó O, Rasztovits E, Cseke K. Different drought sensitivity traits of young sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) stands along a precipitation gradient in Hungary (others) For Ecol Manag. 2021;492:119165 [Google Scholar]
  40. Neumann M, Schnabel G, Gärtner M, Starlinger F, Fürst A, Mutsch F, Englisch M, Smidt S, Jandl R, Gartner K. Waldzustandsmonitoring in Österreich: Ergebnisse der Intensivbeobachtungsflächen (Level II) Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt Wien, Waldforschungszentrum. 2001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer; New York: 2000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pretzsch H, Del Río M, Arcangeli C, Bielak K, Dudzinska M, Forrester DI, Klädtke J, Kohnle U, Ledermann T, Matthews R, et al. Forest growth in Europe shows diverging large regional trends. Sci Rep. 2023;13:15373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41077-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Radaković N, Stajić B. Climate signals in earlywood, latewood and tree-ring width chronologies of Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) from Majdanpek, North–Eastern Serbia. Drv Ind. 2021;72:79–87. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rinn F. TSAP-Win. Time series analysis and presentation for dendrochronology and 409 related applications. 2003 User reference. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosengren U, Göransson H, Jönsson U, Stjernquist I, Thelin G, Wallander H. Functional biodiversity aspects on the nutrient sustainability in forests-importance of root distribution. J Sustain For. 2006;21:77–100. [Google Scholar]
  46. Schad P. World Reference Base for Soil Resources—Its fourth edition and its history. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2023;186:151–163. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwanda K, Cech TL, Hoch G. Vorhandene und neue Schadorganismen an Kiefern. Institut für Waldschutz, Bundesforschungszentrum für Wald; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  48. Senf C, Buras A, Zang CS, Rammig A, Seidl R. Excess forest mortality is consistently linked to drought across Europe. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6200. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19924-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Templ B, Koch E, Bolmgren K, Ungersböck M, Paul A, Scheifinger H, Rutishauser T, Busto M, Chmielewski FM, Hájková L. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. Int J Biometeorol. 2018;62:1109–1113. doi: 10.1007/s00484-018-1512-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tian Y, Davies-Colley R, Gong P, Thorrold B. Estimating solar radiation on slopes of arbitrary aspect. Agric For Meteorol. 2001;109:67–74. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang H, Lin S, Dai J, Ge Q. Modeling the effect of adaptation to future climate change on spring phenological trend of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L) Sci Total Environ. 2022;846:157540. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Winter Artusio E, Dolschak K, Mayer M, Grabner M, Tatzber M, Ahmed IU, Wächter E, Berger IK, Berger P, Wanek W, Berger TW. Ranked growth response to drought for 14 tree species in a temperate forested landscape in Austria. For Ecol Manag. 2025;593:122860 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

RESOURCES