Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2015 Sep 4;195(8):3992–4000. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501426

Biased immunoglobulin light chain gene usage in the shark1

Anna Iacoangeli *, Anita Lui *, Ushma Naik *, Yuko Ohta , Martin Flajnik , Ellen Hsu *
PMCID: PMC4592821  NIHMSID: NIHMS714525  PMID: 26342033

Abstract

This study of a large family of kappa light (L) chain clusters in nurse shark completes the characterization of its classical immunoglobulin (Ig) gene content (two heavy chain classes, mu and omega, and four L chain isotopes, kappa, lambda, sigma, and sigma-2). The shark kappa clusters are minigenes consisting of a simple VL-JL-CL array, where V to J recombination occurs over a ~500 bp interval, and functional clusters are widely separated by at least 100 kb. Six out of ca. 39 kappa clusters are pre-rearranged in the germline (GL-joined). Unlike the complex gene organization and multistep assembly process of Ig in mammals, each shark Ig rearrangement, somatic or in the germline, appears to be an independent event localized to the minigene. This study examined the expression of functional, non-productive, and sterile transcripts of the kappa clusters compared to the other three L chain isotypes. Kappa cluster usage was investigated in young sharks, and a skewed pattern of split gene expression was observed, one similar in functional and non-productive rearrangements. These results show that the individual activation of the spatially distant kappa clusters is non-random. Although both split and GL-joined kappa genes are expressed, the latter are prominent in young animals and wane with age. We speculate that, in the shark, the differential activation of the multiple isotypes can be advantageously used in receptor editing.

Keywords: B cells, Gene Rearrangement, Repertoire Development

INTRODUCTION

Generation of the primary antibody repertoire in mammals is a process the complexity of which has been well-documented but is not fully understood, especially with regard to gene usage. During B cell development V(D)J recombination becomes possible when the gene segments are rendered accessible to the RAG recombinase (encoded by recombination-activating genes) [13]. Two operationally intertwined series of events are involved, one set recruiting transcription factors and initiating modification of the chromatin [47] and the other bringing about a course of DNA looping and contraction wherein the distant gene segments are moved into close proximity with recombinational partners [810].

Following successful rearrangement and expression of H and L chains forming the B cell receptor (BCR) the B lymphocyte is further subject to selection, and auto-reactivity triggers up-regulation of RAG that gives rise to secondary rearrangement events [reviewed in 11]. As such, multiple factors impact on V gene usage in pre-immune B cells, attributable both to the molecular pathways at play and at the level positive and negative receptor selection.

Tetrapod vertebrate Ig are encoded by the IgH locus and by one to three IgL loci, generally organized as a series of V gene segments followed by D and/or J gene segments [12]. The gene segments assemble as VDJ for H chain and VJ for L chain and are transcribed with downstream constant (C) region exon(s). The kappa gene locus in mouse, for instance, consists of 101 functional Vκ and four Jκ spread over >3 megabases [13]. Rearrangement of Vκ to Jκ involves not only bringing widely separated elements by complex DNA looping interactions but also requires complex regulation that equalizes proximal and distal gene segments [10, 14].

In contrast to the spatially spread-out, multigenic tetrapod Ig loci, the IgH and IgL genes in cartilaginous fishes are organized as multiple clusters, respectively VH-D1-D2-JH-CH and VL-JL-CL (Figure 1) [15, 16]. V(D)J recombination takes place primarily within the Ig minigene, which is about 20 kb from leader to the C region transmembrane exons [17, 18]. In the nurse shark the H chain clusters are >120 kb apart [18]; as such, at any cartilaginous fish Ig minigene there is no apparent need for DNA looping/locus compaction since the rearranging partners of a cluster are separated by only 200–500 bp. The IgH clusters appear to function autonomously, and H chain exclusion results from asynchronous rearrangement at individual genes within a given time window [19, 20]. The activation of any shark IgH cluster is discrete, independent of neighboring IgH as well as its allele. In both respects this differs from V(D)J recombination in mouse and humans, which involves a multistep process progressively mobilizing a large region of chromatin [21].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Organization of kappa L chain gene clusters in the nurse shark germline. Top. Kappa gene clusters in the BAC23 clone (Ba141C21), relative position of psVκ18 deduced from another linkage relationship. The orientations and distances between clusters are unknown, the J-C intron distances are as indicated. Leader (L), VL gene segment, JL gene sement, CL exon are labeled. Bottom. Kappa split gene (left) with recombination signal sequences (RSS) shown as triangles, filled for RSS with 12 bp spacer and open for RSS with 23 bp spacer. Germline (GL)-joined (right) shown with pre-recombined VJ.

If shark IgL clusters operate independently, the expression of the four L chain isotypes in shark [22] – the kappa and lambda orthologs, and the sigma and sigma-2 -- ought to correlate with the number of IgL clusters as they do with IgH. Table I provides the tally on kappa genes obtained in the present study together with information on the other three isotypes. Little is known about their function, if they play particular roles, as has evolved for mammalian kappa and lambda in editing autoreactive receptors [11, 23], and obtaining their relative expression levels provides the first complete picture of usage of Ig isotypes arrayed in clusters. Another aspect, peculiar to cartilaginous fishes, is the presence of pre-joined Ig sequences in the genome [2426], some of which are in-frame and potentially functional because mere transcription of the cluster is sufficient to produce a viable protein (Figure 1, VκR7). It has not been clear if and to what extent germline-joined genes (“GL-joined”) participate in the antibody repertoire compared to the others (“split”) that must somatically undergo VDJ recombination to be expressed as protein.

Table I.

Light chain genes in the nurse shark

L chain genea Number Organization Subtypesa
Kappa (NS4) ~39 GL-joined 6 clusters: VkR4, VkR7, VkR18, VkRE18; psVkR6b, psVkR19b, [VkR20]
Split 33 clusters: ≤ 63% functionalc
Lambda (NS3) 6 GL-joined 5 clusters: NS3-12, −23, −46, −17b, −56Ab
GL-joined 1 cluster: NS3-8
Sigma-2 (NS5) 4 GL-joined 1 cluster: NS5-16
Split 3 clusters: NS5-2, −48, −37b
Sigma 2 Split 2 clusters
All L chains ~51 GL-joined 13 clusters:   9 functional (4 kappa)
Split ~38 clusters: ~25 functional (21 kappa)
a

Six GL-joined kappa genes were described in ref. 26 (called R4, R7, R18, RE18, R6, R19), allelic relationship unknown. VkR20 was recently isolated (A. Lui and E. Hsu, unpub. results). Other germline L chain genes were reported in refs. 22, 38, 51. Their earlier names are in parentheses. The subtypes differ from each other either by organization (GL-joined or split) or sequence (NS3-8 and NS3-12 are different by 33% in V and 23% in C).

b

Pseudogene

c

Of 24 unique split VL genes isolated from shark-Y bacteriophage and BAC libraries, nine genes had defective VL gene segments.

The germline kappa L chain gene organization in the nurse shark was characterized. The expression of functional, non-productive, and sterile transcripts of the kappa genes was examined and compared to the other three L chain isotypes. Kappa gene usage was studied in young animals, and gene representation within and between isotypes was observed to be non-random. GL-joined kappa transcripts predominated in the tissues of young animals, and the usage of split genes was skewed, appearing to be due to differential cluster activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Sharks were captured off the coast of Florida (Dynasty Marine). Some were immunized (shark-JS, -GR) and others were sacrificed on arrival (shark-RU, <2 month-old pups) or after caesarian section (“newborn”) [20]. Their organs were harvested immediately on sacrifice and placed in shark phosphate buffered saline (PBS with 350 mm urea and 200 mm NaCl). DNA was extracted from the erythrocyte pellet after centrifugation of blood through Ficoll. The animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Maryland and of SUNY-Downstate.

Libraries

The shark-33 erythrocyte genomic bacteriophage library [27], shark-JS spleen cDNA library [28], newborn shark spleen and epigonal organ cDNA libraries [29], and the shark-Y BAC library have been described [30]. BAC clones were purchased from Arizona Genomic Institute (http://www.genome.arizona.edu), and their grid positions (plate addresses) are listed in Table 1 for clones used in this study.

PCR and qPCR

PCR was performed using genomic DNA or cDNA preparations. First strand cDNA synthesis (Superscript III, Life Technologies) was primed with oligo dT, followed by 30–40 cycles of PCR [20]. Primers used to amplify the genomic and cDNA sequences of the four L chain isotypes are listed in Supplemental Table IA.

Total shark spleen RNA was treated with Turbo DNA-free (Life Technologies) to minimize DNA contamination. After DNase treatment, samples were tested for residual DNA by performing “RNA only” qPCR reaction. Reverse transcriptase was performed as follows using random hexamer primers and Superscript III (Life Technologies): 5 min at 25°C, 1 h at 50°C, 15 min at 70°C. qPCR was performed as follow: 30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 58°C, 30 sec at 72°C, carried out for 40 cycles. qPCR was performed with the IQ SYBR Green Supermix dye kit (BIO-RAD), using CFX96 Real-Time PCR System (BIO-RAD). Nurse shark nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK, GenBank accession number M63964) was chosen as the internal standard. NDK is a housekeeping gene that is stably expressed across various shark tissues (spleen, thymus, epigonal organ, brain, stomach, kidney, unpublished results). The primers (NDK-F: GGTAACAAGGAACGAACC; NDK-R2: AGATCCTTAGGAGCCTGA) targeted two exons (unpublished results). NDK mRNA was used to normalize the amount of total RNA for each qPCR reaction. Ig-specific primers are listed in Supplemental Table IB. The qPCR primers were selected to enable an optimal annealing temperature at 58° C, amplification efficiency between 90 and 110%, and PCR products 104–137 bp in length. In all cases except for sterile transcripts the primers detected spliced products. Each primer pair was done in triplicate, and the entire series performed three separate times.

qPCR data were analyzed using the cycle threshold (Ct) method [31]. For each RNA sample the Ct for L chain RNA was normalized to the Ct for NDK mRNA, resulting in a Ct reflecting the relative level of that L chain isotype in that sample. 2−ΔΔCt was then calculated as measure of the fold-increase of L chain RNA.

Probes

Probes specific for V region of kappa (ns4v), lambda (ns3v), sigma-2 (ns5v) have been described [19]; that for sigma V region (sigv) was generated from a germline sequence with the primers in FR1 (SIGF: TTACAGGTGGACAGTGTC) and CDR3 (SIGVR: GTAAGTACTAGCTGAGGA).

End-labeling PCR fragments

The technique for end-labeling Ig fragments to observe the spectrum of CDR3 lengths in an Ig pool was described for Xenopus H chain [32] and shark L chain [33]. Briefly, purified PCR products were digested with Ava II in a 10 ul volume for one hour, after which 1 ul from a 2.5 ul mixture of α-32P-dCTP (15 µCi, PerkinElmer) and Klenow (5 units, New England Biolabs) was added. After 15 minutes at room temperature, 5 ul of STOP buffer was added. The samples were denatured and loaded onto a 4% acrylamide-urea sequencing gel together with a control sequencing reaction using M13mp18 phage to calibrate strand size. The PCR reaction, using the NS4L and JL5A primers (Supplemental Table IA), generated fragments of ~380 bp. Digestion of the Ava II site in FR3 produced fragments of 265 bp and the varying bands of <120 bp containing CDR3.

RESULTS

Igk clusters

To obtain an estimate of kappa cluster numbers a shark genomic library was screened with kappa VL probe (ns4v). Thirty-five verified signals were obtained from 200,000 phages. With an average insert size of 16.9 kb, the genome coverage was 0.9 (3.75 × 109 bp/nurse shark genome), leading us to estimate 39 kappa genes per genome. Table I provides a summary of these results, comparison of the numbers of IgL clusters of the four isotypes, identification of pseudogenes, and relative number of GL-joined genes compared to split genes.

The nurse shark BAC library was screened with the ns4v probe, and from 124 clones 48 were selected for further analysis, of which 31 (65%) were confirmed to carry kappa sequence. Twenty-one BAC clones contained one kappa cluster as found by PCR amplification for VL and Southern blotting for VL and CL, and ten others carried 2–3 clusters. The BAC clones are listed in Table 2 (Genbank accession numbers KP893402-KP893421, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/), and included also are seven kappa genes previously characterized in the same animal [26]. The VL sequences with obvious structural defects, such as disrupted reading frame, splice signal or the RSS, are prefixed by “ps” for pseudogene. These constitute one third (11/30) of all VL gene segments isolated in shark-Y so far.

Table II.

Cloned nurse shark Igk

Clone name a
BAC# - coordinate
VL gene b PCR product
L-V-J size c
Number VL Pst I d
fragment
function e
BAC1 - Ba010G16 Vk1 1.25 kb 1 1.2 kb functional
BAC2 - Ba011G2 psVk2a
Vk2b
1.15
1.05
2 1.4
1.5
RSS cgc functional
BAC4 - Ba017J16 psVk18
Vk30
1.1
1.1
2 1.4 RSS cgc functional
BAC5 - Ba017K15 Vk5 1.1 1 1.5 functional
BAC6 - Ba028C1 psVk6a
Vk6b
Vk6c
1.1
1.1
1.1
3 1.4 RSS cgc Vk6b defective CL functional
BAC7 - Ba036O8 psVk8 1.1 1 1.4 RSS cgc
BAC9 - Ba044C13 psVk8 1.1 1 1.4 RSS cgc
BAC10- Ba050O1 VkR7 0.55 1 0.8 VkR7 in-frame VJ
BAC11- Ba057N16 psVk11 1.1 1 4.4 Stop in CDR2
BAC12- Ba068L10 psVk12 1.1 1 1.4 Splice site defect; RSS cag; stop
BAC14- Ba085G1 psVk8 1.1 1 1.4 BAC7-Ba036O8
BAC16- Ba099E18 Vk16 1.1 1 1.5 functional
BAC17- Ba104M1 VkRE18 0.55 1 1.4 VkRE18 in-frame VJ
BAC18- Ba107M16 Vk18b
psVk18
1.1
1.1
2 1.4 functional RSS cgc
BAC19- Ba109L24 Vk19 1.1 1 1.4 functional
BAC21- Ba116A15 Vk6b 1.1 1 1.4 functional
BAC22- Ba121B18 (ND)
psVk8
1.15
1.1
2 1.5
1.4
(ND) BAC7 - Ba036O8
BAC23- Ba141C21 Vk5
psVk18
1.1
1.1
3 1.5
1.4
functional RSS cgc
VkR7 0.55 0.8 VkR7 in-frame VJ
BAC26- Ba156I14 psVk18 1.1 1 1.4 RSS cgc
BAC27- Ba176B16 psVk27 1.1 1 1.4 RSS cgc
BAC29- Ba199O6 psVk8 1.1 1 1.4 BAC7 - Ba036O8
BAC30- Ba202P14 Vk30 1.1 1 1.5 functional
BAC36- Ba215F13 Vk36 1.1 1 1.4 functional
BAC38- Ba217B20 psVk2a
Vk2b
1.1
1.1
2 1.4
1.5
BAC2-Ba011G2
BAC41- Ba237L13 psVk8 1.1 1 1.4 BAC7-Ba036O8
BAC43- Ba311O24 Vk43 1.1 1 1.4 functional
BAC45- Ba329G13 Vk45 1.1 1 1.5 functional
BAC46- Ba648D9 Vk18b
psVk18
1.1
1.1
2 1.4
1.4
BAC18-Ba107M16
BAC49- Ba671L7 Vk36
psVk49
1.1
1.1
2 1.4
1.5
functional RSS cgc
BAC50- Ba722N1 psVk2a
Vk50
1.1
1.1
2 1.4
1.3
RSS cgc functional
BAC51- Ba735C14 psVk18 1.1 1 1.4 BAC26-Ba156I14
Bacteriophage clones f
9-NS4 Vk52 1.1 functional
28-NS4 (S10) Vk53 1.1 functional
7-NS4 psVk54 1.1 stop in FR2
R4 VkR4 0.55 in-frame VJ
R6 psVkR6 0.55 insertion in FR1
R18 VkR18 0.55 in-frame VJ
R19 psVkR19 0.55 insertion in FR1
a

BAC# is our nomenclature, whereas coordinates refer to plate addresses of the shark library from Arizona Genomics Institute.

b

Sequence submitted to GenBank. “ps” prefix indicates pseudogene, R indicates GL-joined VJ.

c

PCR primers in leader and JL. PCR fragment of 0.55 kb indicates GL-joined VJ (highlighted rows) and one >1 kb a split gene with ~500 bp intersegmental region.

d

Southern blotting of BAC DNA, filter probed with kappa probes to VL or CL.

e

VL gene determined non-functional “ps” prefix due to (1) mutation in RSS (RSS cgc), (2) splice motif defect, (3) insertions or stop codon that destroy the reading frame, or (4) defective C exon, where noted.

f

Genomic clones containing kappa genes, obtained from shark-Y DNA in previous study [26]. They are listed by their former phage names.

Although there can be more than one kappa gene per BAC clone, in 9/10 instances only one of the clusters is apparently functional; in BAC6 the Vκ6b gene segment is linked to a defective C exon. The only exception is BAC23, where there are two adjacent ones, Vκ5 and the GL-joined VκR7 gene (Fig. 1).

Long-range PCR indicated that the JL-CL intron ranges 8–12 kb (not shown). Since the average length of BAC inserts in this library is 100 kb [30], the kappa clusters are situated relatively far apart and the functional genes on separate BAC clones are at least 100 kb apart.

Germline-rearranged clusters

Kappa sequence was amplified from the BAC clones using universal primers in the leader and JL. The PCR product size of 1.1 kb shows that the V-J intersegmental sequence is about 500 bp, and its deletion can be detected in the GL-joined VJ (Table 2, shaded rows); GL-joined VκR7 and VκRE18 were identified previously [26]. In shark-Y 24 “split” genes and six GL-joined genes have been cloned. To get a sense of their distribution in the population, GL-joined kappa genes of three nurse sharks were amplified from their erythrocyte DNA and 40–50 cloned sequences were analyzed in each animal. Two sharks (LA and EC) carried VκRE18, R18, R4, and a novel gene, VκR20 (GenBank accession number HM068964); a third animal carried VκRE18, R18, RE19 and R20. By differential restriction enzyme digestion of the PCR product, it could be ascertained that the GL-joined genes in shark-LA were present in equal copy numbers and that VκR7 was absent (data not shown).

Sterile transcripts

When the kappa V-J sequences were aligned, it could be seen that a polyadenylation motif (AATAAA) was present in every single case, ~ 210 bp downstream of the RSS. Polyadenylation can occur at this site or 3’ of the C in non-rearranged or “sterile” transcripts. In the latter, the transcripts contain leader spliced to VL, the intersegmental region, JL spliced to C region (Figure 2, kappa).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kappa, sigma, sigma-2 sterile transcripts. RNA transcripts from the four L chain isotypes, as labeled. Kappa: mature mRNA, sterile VL transcript, sterile transcript with VL and JC. Sigma-2: mature mRNA, sterile transcript with splicing within VL-JL region, sterile transcript without splicing. Sigma: mature mRNA, sterile transcript with splicing within VL-JL region, sterile transcript with 3’ splice site at the C exon. Lambda: mature mRNA. The figures drawn with polyA tails have been isolated from cDNA libraries, the others were cloned by RT-PCR. Arrows indicate location of qPCR primers. RSS are shown as filled (12 bp spacer) and open (23 bp spacer) triangles.

PCR products generated using primers in leader and 3’ of the VL RSS, wherein the leader intron has been spliced out, demonstrate that kappa sterile transcripts are also present in adult spleen mRNA. Pseudogenes with defective RSS are transcribed as well. Since there is no kappa signal from thymus RNA in northerns (not shown) and RAG1 is no longer produced in splenocytes [34, 35], the sterile transcripts appear to be relics of earlier events in B cell differentiation.

L chain isotypes sigma and sigma-2 gene clusters can rearrange. Two types of sigma sterile transcripts have been found, one of which is prominent in spleen (Figure 2, sigma). A sterile transcript of similar characteristics is produced by sigma-2 (Figure 2, sigma-2). The positions of qPCR primers detecting JC products compared to sterile transcripts are shown in Figure 2. The generally low levels of GL transcripts (next section) means that the JC products detected in qPCR consist almost entirely of transcripts of rearranged genes.

Comparative L chain isotype expression

Differential L chain isotype expression was initially examined by screening a shark-JS spleen cDNA library. C region probes detected similar numbers of IgM-hybridizing phages (229) as kappa (216), in contrast with considerably fewer IgW (8), lambda (13), sigma (8) and sigma-2 (19) phages. Screening of larger numbers of phages yielded comparable results among the non-kappa sequences (49 lambda, 39 sigma, 65 sigma-2). The graph in Figure 3A shows that qPCR performed on shark-JS spleen RNA produced parallel results, with respect to kappa (48.8) versus non-kappa levels (lambda (0.3 +0.6, total 0.9), sigma (2), sigma-2 (3.8 + 0.2, total 4)). Only B cells rearrange and express L chains [19], but the cellular composition of the spleen changes with age [34], so that standardization with NDK, which is expressed in the other cell types, enable only comparison of L chain expression of within an RNA sample. Despite this caveat, it can be seen that overall L chain levels increase with age, consistent with studies on plasma Ig levels showing rise of the 19S species during neonatal development [36].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Determination of relative L chain transcript levels in individual sharks. DNAse-treated RNA samples were analyzed using qPCR detection system. Spleen samples from five individuals were screened for sigma -2, kappa, lambda, and sigma genes, specific genes as labeled, and GL-joined genes are asterisked. ST is sterile transcript. Panels A and C, immunized sharks. Panel B, non-immunized shark. Panel D, pup shark, and panel E newborn shark. Graphs show L chain levels normalized to NDK (fold increase to NDK, 2−ΔΔCt). NDK level is shown in grey.

There are at least 25 functional kappa clusters, 4 lambda, 3 sigma-2, and 2 sigma clusters (Table I). If there were a simple correlation with the number of available functional genes, at least 74% of the L chain mRNA from lymphoid tissue would consist of kappa transcripts. Indeed, in the immunized (Figure 3A, C) and non-immunized (Figure 3B) animals, kappa transcripts are the great majority. Although this is also true in young animals, the relative levels are different. In the newborn (Figure 3E) and the pup (Figure 3D) of est. two months, the ratio of two sigma-2 rearranging genes, NS5-2/48, to kappa is 1:3.3 (1.3:4.3) in AQ and 1:3.4 (6.7:22.8) in LA. These results are consistent with in situ data on splenic secretory cells of young animals (Castro and Flajnik, unpublished results). In contrast, the sigma-2 to kappa ratios in adults range from 1:14 to 1:31, showing that after an initial bias for sigma-2, selection has taken place over time in the adults.

Primer pairs distinguishing sterile transcripts included one primer either 3’ of the VL RSS or 5’ of the JL RSS (see indicated locations in Figure 2). The sterile transcript levels were generally 1% to 10% of the total levels of that isotype (Figure 3, bars labeled ST). The most abundant sterile transcript tended to be sigma, where the GL levels from two clusters could consist of 30% of the total sigma pool (0.6/2.0, Figure 3A). Although there are also two split sigma-2 clusters (NS5-2/48) that can produce sterile transcripts, there is much less (<0.4%) in all the animals.

GL-joined genes, indicated by asterix in Figure 3, can be compared to split gene expression in the sigma-2 isotype, where two clusters rearrange (NS5-2, 48) and one is pre-joined (NS5-16). The ratio of the GL-joined to split in newborn is 1:2.6 and in the pup 1:6, and from 1:7 to 1:19 in the adults (Figure 3, sigma-2). In summary, the GL-joined sigma-2 is expressed at similar frequency as the two split genes in neonates but expression decreases with age. Although the levels of the GL-joined sigma-2 are low, they are almost always higher than the single-copy GL-joined lambda gene (NS3-8). All lambda genes are GL-joined, and although there are several such clusters, the expression level of this isotype is the lowest in all individuals, often on a par with sterile transcripts of kappa or even sigma (Figure 3, indicated as ST). The GL-joined kappa have a very different expression pattern (next section).

Kappa gene usage

Kappa sequences were amplified from pup spleen mRNA, using 30 cycles of PCR to minimize artifact. Pup Ig is little affected by SHM [37, 38], so assignment to a GL gene was not difficult. GL-joined kappas constitute 36% of the cloned sequences (Table III, column 1) although they are 16% of the functional kappa genes, and they were not preferentially PCR-amplified since they are within the size range of rearranging sequences. This supposition is confirmed by the few repeats observed among somatically generated CDR3.

Table III.

Kappa gene expression in pup sIgM+ cells.

Shark-LA Shark-EC
Total RNA non-
productivea
non-
productiveb
in-frameb
Igk VkRE18 15 - - -
  VkR4 6 - - -
  VkR20 1 - - -
  VkR18 2 - - -
  Vk5 17 (15 unique) 18 0 0
  Vk2b 0 3 14 26 (23 unique)
  Vk16 2 2 0 0
  Vk53 11 (10 unique) 11 5 10
  Vk43 6 0 1 3
  Vk45 2 2 1 3 (2 unique)
  Vk6b 1 0 0 0
  Vk30 0 1 0 0
  Vk50 0 0 2 1
  Vk52 0 0 5 6
  Vk36 0 0 5 1
  unknown 3 1 2 3
total 66 38 34 53
splitIgk 42 (39 unique) 38 34 53 (50 unique)
GL-joined Igk (% of total) 24 (36%) - - -
a

An independent PCR reaction was performed to amplify non-functional rearrangements, which were 39% of the 97 analyzed clones. The in-frame and GL-joined sequences were discarded.

b

One PCR reaction was performed, of which only split gene rearrangements were scored.

Moreover there appeared to be a skewing of expression among split genes, in particular Vκ5 and Vκ53 (Table III, column 1; Supplemental Figure 1S). To determine whether the B cell population had undergone selection, non-productive kappa rearrangements were isolated from total spleen RNA. To obtain nonfunctional VJ, we used the same reverse primer but employed a forward PCR primer (NS4LI1) within the leader intron [34]. 38/97 of the cloned sequences (Table III, column 2 under shark-LA; Supplemental Figure 1S) were rearranged out-of-frame, and 29/38 (76%) were Vκ5 and Vκ53, similar to what was found in total RNA (28/42, 67%).

In comparing the 35 Vκ5 cDNA, 32 were identical in VL and CL other than occasional single base differences that were not shared between clones, confirming bias for the Vκ5 cluster. The 22 Vκ53 clones were similarly confirmed. Their combined 71% frequency is not due to multiple copies since two copies of Vκ53 and none of Vκ5 were observed among 21 functional split Vκ genes isolated from this animal. There also appears to be no great difference in RSS sequences between highly frequent and underrepresented kappa clusters.

To ascertain whether skewed kappa gene usage is the norm, non-productive kappa rearrangements were amplified from another pup (Table III, shark-EC). Only split genes were tallied, and 34/87 were out-of-frame. The distribution of Vκ gene usage is different in the second pup. Among the non-productive sequences 19/34 (56%) were Vκ2b and Vκ53. A similar distribution was found among the in-frame split genes (36/53, 68%). Of the genes prominent in pup LA, Vκ5 was not observed at all (<1/87) in pup EC.

GL-joined cDNA in newborn shark library

Newborn shark cDNA libraries, one constructed from two spleens and another from two epigonal organs, were screened with the ns4v probe. The phage inserts were sequenced and the results summarized in Table IV. The majority of kappa sequences from both libraries consisted of GL-joined genes. VκRE18, R18 and R6 all contain CDR3 of nine codons; those of the recombined VJ ranged from 7–13 codons. The 19 unique somatically recombined sequences consisted of at least 11 Vκ genes, without biased representation of Vκ5 or Vκ53.

Table IV.

Kappa L chain clones isolated from newborn shark cDNA libraries.

Epigonal
organ
Spleen
Igk VkRE18 23 28
  VkR4 3 0
  VkR18 0 1
  ψpsVkR6 1 0
splitIgk 11 11 (8 unique)
total 38 40
GL-joined Igk (% of total) 27 (71%) 29 (73%)

Kappa sequences were amplified from the spleen cDNA of the same newborn animals and from adult PBL. The samples were digested with Ava II, a site present in 13 of the 16 functional kappa genes and 4 of 5 GL-joined genes in Table II. Figure 4 shows a comparison of the neonatal and adult kappa populations, the dominant band of nine codons in newborn cDNA confirming the GL-joined character (RE18, R18) of kappa L chain pool in these young animals (Tables IV).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Kappa L chain CDR3 lengths of newborn and adult. Top. Flow chart of end-labeling procedure. Kappa V region PCR products are generated from an RNA pool of two newborn spleens and from adult PBL RNA. The fragments are purified and incubated with Ava II, followed by end-labeling with 32P-dCTP (see Materials and Methods). Bottom. Electrophoresis of denatured fragments. The samples were loaded next to M13mp18 phage (first four lanes labeled GATC) sequenced with −40 primer. The sizes of the shark fragments and their CDR3 were determined by the phage strand size plus labeled nucleotide (101–116 bases plus 1). The other halves of the Ava II-digested fragments were less well separated and not shown.

DISCUSSION

Although Ig L chain gene isotypes and their cluster organization in cartilaginous fishes have long been established [16, 22], the expression patterns and relative usage of the various isotypes and individual genes have not been investigated in depth. In this report the characterization of the Igk clusters in nurse shark completes classification of its classical Ig genes. All RNA forms of the various L chain isotypes, including sterile transcripts, were studied and their relative expression examined by qPCR. Kappa gene usage was examined in several animals.

L chain isotype and GL-joined gene expression

Quantitative PCR measurements in adult animals showed that kappa was the most abundantly expressed L chain isotype, followed by sigma-2, sigma, and lambda, generally according to gene numbers. However in young animals the distribution of individual gene expression is distinctly uneven with respect to the few sigma-2 genes compared to the many kappa genes. It appears that sigma-2 genes are at least equally if not more readily accessible to RAG than kappa clusters.

Whereas between isotypes one may anticipate cis-regulatory differences affecting transcriptional initiation or efficiency, it is less easy to understand those within one L chain isotype because of the similarity of their upstream sequence. That is, within the kappa and the sigma-2 isotypes the relative abundance of their GL-joined genes is not proportional to split genes (Figure 3). The GL-joined kappa genes are the major transcript in total spleen RNA in young animals, and this wanes in older animals [26]. This observation is a complex issue on several counts. If the GL-joined gene were expressed as part of the BCR, then this cell population is one that decreases dramatically as the animals age. But what if a GL-joined IgL is transcribed in a B cell but the protein is not used due to incompatibility with the H chain? Unlike the vast majority of non-productive rearrangements the in-frame GL-joined transcripts will not be down-regulated as a result of RNA surveillance mechanisms [39]. As a result, when such genes are activated although are not used as part of the BCR, the transcript levels could be as high as the actual L chain in use.

However, if this were the case, the levels in newborn and adult would not be so very different as found. Our observations can be better explained if certain B cell subpopulations preferentially express the GL-joined genes. In the nurse shark IgM1gj is a unique IgH cluster with in-frame VDJ and three C exons that have diverged extensively from Cμ2–Cμ4, and only the secreted protein has been observed [29]. In cells that secrete IgM1gj RAG would not be needed for its expression. However, IgM1gj protein is secreted with L chain, and in the absence of RAG only the GL-joined IgL clusters can produce L chain protein; in the split clusters sterile transcripts would result. Because IgM1gj is prominent only in young animals, the notion of a subpopulation of cells with preference for GL-joined L chain expression is at this time compatible with the qPCR and cloning observations. If kappa and sigma-2 genes are generally activated earlier than the other two isotypes then the GL-joined kappa and sigma-2 genes would also be expressed in IgM1gj cells. With age, this subpopulation recedes, together with the levels of these GL-joined transcripts.

Unlike nurse shark the clearnose skate carries many different GL-joined VDJ, and these constitute 10–15% of H chain transcripts in embryo and hatchling but cannot be detected in adult [40]. Since a large portion of these are out-of-frame or carry debilitating mutations, their expression has been attributed to a generalized IgH cluster activation in cells present in the skate lymphoid tissues. Litman and coauthors [40] suggested that “widespread run-off of Ig clusters” enabled Ig expression of limited diversity early in development. Inasmuch as IgM1gj encoded by a unique shark cluster and the many skate GL-joined VDJ sequences have not been shown to produce actual protein, the similarities of age-dependent GL-joined Ig expression in shark and skate suggest a form of limited protection by this kind of secreted Ig early in development.

Kappa gene usage

RSS accessibility in mouse Ig and TCR systems have been correlated with chromatin environment, nucleosome density, and participation of cis-regulatory sites [41, 42]. However, recombinational efficiency among the V gene segments is not evenly distributed; for instance, seven mouse Vκ genes out of 101 participate in >40% of its repertoire [43]. It is thought that the frequency of Vκ interaction with the intronic and 3’ kappa enhancer and the Sis element [44] involved in locus contraction makes the Vκ gene segment accessible for rearrangement to JL, and the frequency is in part correlated with binding of transcription factors and histone modifications. A recent study concluded that, the greater the number of nearby transcription factor binding sites, the more frequent the usage [9].

What has emerged from the present studies is that the split kappa cluster usage in shark is also not random. In shark-LA Vκ5 and Vκ53 make up 71% of the kappa transcripts derived from somatically rearranged IgL. Since the representation is similar in non-productive rearrangements as in total RNA, the bias is not due to selection on the BCR. Although most of the sequence upstream of the leader among the Vκ are almost identical (25 and unpublished results), even a few differences may affect promoter efficiency [45]. Of the known Vκ that are expressed in shark-LA, 6/7 carry identical, canonical RSS while those that do not have 1–2 bp substitutions in the nonamer. It is possible that more than one IgL is accessible to RAG in a cell, as suggested by the presence of sterile transcripts [46], but unless many Igk are competitively involved it is hard to see how efficiency of RSS binding in itself causes unequal expression levels. In mouse there was no clear relationship between the quality of RSS with frequency of usage [43].

Since nothing is known about H or L chain gene promoters or enhancers in the shark, the basis for its preferential Igk cluster activation must remain speculative. Regulatory differences could be due to as-yet unidentified cis-regulatory elements in the J-C intron or 3’ of the C exon as in the mouse Igk. Additional activating elements may be more thickly distributed among some shark Vκ clusters than others. Among individual animals the most frequently rearranged Vκ genes are not the same. The sharks probably do not carry the same complement of Igk, as shown by the presence of VκR7 in shark-Y but not in shark-LA. But this cannot explain other observations. For instance both pups express the Vκ2b cluster but in one animal it becomes recombined at a higher frequency (Table III). This suggests that elements rendering any Igk accessible to RAG are unevenly distributed in the population. Perhaps certain regulatory elements for Vκ2b are not tightly linked to the cluster so that meiotic recombination or other events have severed their influence in shark-LA. Recent studies in chromatin profiling of mouse antigen receptor loci have revealed additional, novel regulatory elements, demonstrating that recombinational potential is not controlled solely by the classical enhancers [47].

Mouse and shark

What makes for the shark L chain diversity? Interestingly, junctional diversity and combinatorial diversity are inversely important in mouse and shark. In mouse, with >100 functional Vκ and four Jκ there are at least 400 combinatorial possibilities for recombined VJ; in shark there are only as many VJ combinations are there are functional clusters, 25 (Table I). In mouse the Vκ are diverse and classified into 18 families, where 55–80% sequence identity is shared between families [48]. During receptor editing nested rearrangements will recruit upstream VL of different families [42]. In contrast, in the shark the functional Vκ are all members of one family that share 80–98% identity. Whereas >90% of mouse kappa CDR3 are 9 codons in length due to down-regulation of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase activity during L chain rearrangement [49, 50], this is not the case in shark because 90% of its rearranging L chains have N region and thus extensive CDR3 diversity [22, 51 and Supplemental Figure S1]. Therefore, where in mouse the Vκ gene segment choice is diverse but the CDR3 loop size spectrum is limited, in shark the L chain diversity hinges on the size and sequence of CDR3. Moreover, for the same reasons of cluster organization and low (9–12) minigene number the H chain diversity in nurse shark also centers on CDR3. This being the case, then the specificity and potential auto-reactivity of an Ig receptor in developing shark B cells are more likely to lie in the CDR3.

Based on the above observations we will make a speculation about L chain isotype function and receptor editing in the shark. Although the shark Ig gene organization and Ig assembly may operate differently from those of tetrapods, one fundamental aspect of adaptive immunity they must share is the generation of auto-reactive receptors. The randomness of V(D)J recombination, selected for in evolution, is anticipated to produce a majority of receptors that react to the internal self environment [52]. In mouse, when secondary rearrangements at the kappa locus are exhausted, V(D)J recombination goes on to a different L chain isotype, the lambda locus [53, 54]. If any form of receptor editing exists in shark, the constraints of the cluster organization oblige secondary rearrangement to take place at another IgL cluster. This could permit L chain inclusion, but in surviving B cells the first L chain is either functionally inactivated or is displaced in interaction with H chain.

We suggest that if auto-reactivity resides in the CDR3 combination of the H and L chains, then further rearrangement at another IgL of the same family could rectify this. But if the CDR3 of the initial L chain is not crucial to the self-specificity, then the possible remedy is to express another L chain isotype that will, overall, create a different combining site with the H chain. The initial IgL activated is possibly at sigma-2, given its preferred expression in young sharks, whose sigma-2 to kappa ratio was 1:3 (Figure 3D, E). A secondary rearrangement could take place at the second sigma-2 cluster or at another isotype entirely. Although clonal deletion is an unanswerable solution for lymphocytes expressing anti-self receptors, a form of receptor editing may nonetheless take place in the shark to allay cell wastage, utilizing advantageously its multiple L chain isotypes.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

We thank Amanda Chan for determining the genomic organization of shark NDK and Helen Dooley for sharing sequence information on CD79a.

Footnotes

1

This work was supported in part by funding from the National Institutes of Health GM068095 (EH).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Yancopoulos GD, Alt FW. Developmentally controlled and tissue-specific expression of unrearranged VH gene segments. Cell. 1985;40:271–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stanhope-Baker P, Hudson KM, Shaffer AL, Constantinescu A, Schlissel MS. Cell type-specific chromatin structure determines the targeting of V(D)J recombinase activity in vitro. Cell. 1996;85:887–897. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schatz DG, Ji Y. Recombination centres and the orchestration of V(D)J recombination. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:251–263. doi: 10.1038/nri2941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnson K, Angelin-Duclos C, Park S, Calame KL. Changes in histone acetylation are associated with differences in accessibility of V(H) gene segments to V-DJ recombination during B-cell ontogeny and development. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:2438–2450. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2438-2450.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Osipovich O, Milley R, Meade A, Tachibana M, Shinkai Y, Krangel MS, Oltz EM. Targeted inhibition of V(D)J recombination by a histone methyltransferase. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:309–316. doi: 10.1038/ni1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bevington S, Boyes J. Transcription-coupled eviction of histones H2A/H2B governs V(D)J recombination. EMBO J. 2013;32:1381–1392. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stadhouders R, de Bruijn MJ, Rother MB, Yuvaraj S, Ribeiro de Almeida C, Kolovos P, Van Zelm MC, van Ijcken W, Grosveld F, Soler E, Hendriks RW. Pre-B cell receptor signaling induces immunoglobulin κ locus accessibility by functional redistribution of enhancer-mediated chromatin interactions. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roldán E, Fuxa M, Chong W, Martinez D, Novatchkova M, Busslinger M, Skok JA. Locus 'decontraction' and centromeric recruitment contribute to allelic exclusion of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:31–41. doi: 10.1038/ni1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jhunjhunwala S, van Zelm MC, Peak MM, Cutchin S, Riblet R, van Dongen JJ, Grosveld FG, Knoch TA, Murre C. The 3D structure of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: implications for long-range genomic interactions. Cell. 2008;133:265–279. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ribeiro de Almeida C, Stadhouders R, de Bruijn MJ, Bergen IM, Thongjuea S, Lenhard B, van Ijcken W, Grosveld F, Galjart N, Soler E, Hendriks RW. The DNA-binding protein CTCF limits proximal Vκ recombination and restricts κ enhancer interactions to the immunoglobulin κ light chain locus. Immunity. 2011;35:501–513. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nemazee D. Receptor editing in lymphocyte development and central tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:728–740. doi: 10.1038/nri1939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flajnik MF, Du Pasquier L. Evolution of the Immune System. In: Paul WE, editor. Fundamental Immunology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wollers Kluwer Heath/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 57–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V, Kaas Q, Duprat E, Jabado-Michaloud J, Scaviner D, Ginestoux C, Clément O, Chaume D, Lefranc G. IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:D593–D597. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiang Y, Park SK, Garrard WT. A major deletion in the Vκ-Jκ intervening region results in hyperelevated transcription of proximal Vκ genes and a severely restricted repertoire. J Immunol. 2014;193:3746–3754. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hinds KR, Litman GW. Major reorganization of immunoglobulin VH segmental elements during vertebrate evolution. Nature. 1986;320:546–549. doi: 10.1038/320546a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shamblott MJ, Litman GW. Genomic organization and sequences of immunoglobulin light chain genes in a primitive vertebrate suggest coevolution of immunoglobulin gene organization. EMBO J. 1989;8:3733–3739. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08549.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kokubu F, Hinds K, Litman R, Shamblott MJ, Litman GW. Complete structure and organization of immunoglobulin heavy chain constant region genes in a phylogenetically primitive vertebrate. EMBO J. 1988;7:1979–1988. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03036.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee V, Huang JL, Lui MF, Malecek K, Ohta Y, Mooers A, Hsu E. The evolution of multiple isotypic IgM heavy chains in the shark. J. Immunol. 2008;180:7461–7470. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Malecek K, Lee V, Feng W, Huang JL, Flajnik MF, Ohta Y, Hsu E. Immunoglobulin heavy chain exclusion in the shark. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu C, Feng W, Weedon J, Hua P, Stepanov D, Ohta Y, Flajnik MF, Hsu E. The multiple shark immunoglobulin heavy chain genes rearrange and hypermutate autonomously. J. Immunol. 2011;187:2492–2501. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Choi NM, Feeney AJ. CTCF and ncRNA regulate the three-dimensional structure of antigen receptor loci to facilitate V(D)J recombination. Front Immunol. 2014;5:49. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Criscitiello MF, Flajnik MF. Four primordial immunoglobulin light chain isotypes, including λ and κ, identified in the most primitive living jawed vertebrates. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:2683–2694. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vela JL, Aït-Azzouzene D, Duong BH, Ota T, Nemazee D. Rearrangement of mouse immunoglobulin kappa deleting element recombining sequence promotes immune tolerance and lambda B cell production. Immunity. 2008;28:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Litman GW, Anderson MK, Rast JP. Evolution of antigen binding receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;7:109–147. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kokubu F, Litman R, Shamblott MJ, Hinds K, Litman GW. Diverse organization of immunoglobulin VH gene loci in a primitive vertebrate. EMBO J. 1988;7:3413–3422. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03215.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lee SS, Fitch D, Flajnik MF, Hsu, E E. Rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes in shark germ cells. J Exp Med. 2000;191:1637–1648. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.10.1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Malecek K, Brandman J, Brodsky JE, Ohta Y, Flajnik MF, Hsu E. Somatic hypermutation and junctional diversification at Ig heavy chain loci in the nurse shark. J Immunol. 2005;175:8105–8115. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu C, Lee V, Finn A, Senger K, Zarrin AA, Du Pasquier L, Hsu E. Origin of immunoglobulin isotype switching. Curr. Biol. 2012;22:872–880. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rumfelt LL, Avila D, Diaz M, Bartl S, McKinney EC EC, Flajnik MF. A shark antibody heavy chain encoded by a nonsomatically rearranged VDJ is preferentially expressed in early development and is convergent with mammalian IgG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1775–1780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Luo M, Kim H, Kudrna D, Sisneros NB, Lee S-J, Mueller C, Collura K, Zuccolo A, Buckingham EB, Grim SM, Yanagiya K, Inoko H, Shiina T, Flajnik MF, Wing RA, Ohta Y. Construction of a nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library and a preliminary genome survey. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Desravines S, Hsu E. Measuring CDR3 length variability during ontogeny. J Immunol Meth. 1993;168:219–225. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lee SS, Greenberg A, Hsu E. Evolution and somatic diversification of immunoglobulin light chains. Curr Top Micro Immunol. 2000;248:285–300. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59674-2_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rumfelt LL, McKinney EC, Taylor E, Flajnik MF. The development of primary and secondary lymphoid tissues in the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum: B-cell zones precede dendritic cell immigration and T-cell zone formation during ontogeny of the spleen. Scand J Immunol. 2002;56:130–148. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01116.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhu C, Hsu E. Error-prone DNA repair activity during somatic hypermutation in shark B lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2010;185:5336–5347. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fidler JE, Clem LW, Small PA., Jr Immunoglobulin synthesis in neonatal nurse sharks (Ginglymostoma cirratum) Comp Biochem Physiol. 1969;31:365–371. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(69)91660-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rumfelt LL, Lohr RL, Dooley H, Flajnik MF. Diversity and repertoire of IgW and IgM VH families in the newborn nurse shark. BMC Immunol. 2004;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-5-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee SS, Tranchina D, Ohta Y, Flajnik MF, Hsu E. Hypermutation in shark immunoglobulin light chain genes results in contiguous substitutions. Immunity. 2002;16:571–582. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00300-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chemin G, Tinguely A, Sirac C, Lechouane F, Duchez S, Cogné M, Delpy L. Multiple RNA surveillance mechanisms cooperate to reduce the amount of nonfunctional Ig kappa transcripts. J Immunol. 2010;184:5009–5017. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Miracle AL, Anderson MK, Litman RT, Walsh CJ, Luer CA, Rothenberg EV, Litman GW. Complex expression patterns of lymphocyte-specific genes during the development of cartilaginous fish implicate unique lymphoid tissues in generating an immune repertoire. Int Immunol. 2001;13:567–580. doi: 10.1093/intimm/13.4.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Little AJ, Matthews A, Oettinger M, Roth DB, Schatz DG. The Mechanism of V(D)J Recombination. In: Alt FW, Honjo T, Radbruch A, Reth M, editors. Molecular Biology of B cells. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Academic Press; 2015. pp. 13–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gopalakrishnan S, Majumder K, Predeus A, Huang Y, Koues OI, Verma-Gaur J, Loguercio S, Su AI, Feeney AJ, Artyomov MN, Oltz EM. Unifying model for molecular determinants of the preselection Vβ repertoire. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3206–E3215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304048110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aoki-Ota M, Torkamani A, Ota T, Schork N, Nemazee D. Skewed primary Igκ repertoire and V-J joining in C57BL/6 mice: implications for recombination accessibility and receptor editing. J Immunol. 2012;188:2305–2315. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu Z, Widlak P, Zou Y, Xiao F, Oh M, Li S, Chang MY, Shay JW, Garrard WT. A recombination silencer that specifies heterochromatin positioning and ikaros association in the immunoglobulin kappa locus. Immunity. 2006;24:405–415. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fitzsimmons SP, Aydanian AG, Clark KJ, Shapiro MA. Multiple factors influence the contribution of individual immunoglobulin light chain genes to the naïve antibody repertoire. BMC Immunol. 2014;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12865-014-0051-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Abarrategui I, Krangel MS. Germline transcription: a key regulator of accessibility and recombination. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;650:93–102. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0296-2_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Predeus AV, Gopalakrishnan S, Huang Y, Tang J, Feeney AJ, Oltz EM, Artyomov MN. Targeted chromatin profiling reveals novel enhancers in Ig H and Ig L chain loci. J Immunol. 2014;192:1064–1070. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thiebe R, Schäble KF, Bensch A, Brensing-Küppers J, Heim V, Kirschbaum T, Mitlöhner H, Ohnrich M, Pourrajabi S, Röschenthaler F, Schwendinger J, Wichelhaus D, Zocher I, Zachau HG. The variable genes and gene families of the mouse immunoglobulin kappa locus. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:2072–2081. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199907)29:07<2072::AID-IMMU2072>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Victor KD, Vu K K, Feeney AJ. Limited junctional diversity in kappa light chains. Junctional sequences from CD43+B220+ early B cell progenitors resemble those from peripheral B cells. J Immunol. 152:3467–3475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li YS, Hayakawa K, Hardy RR. The regulated expression of B lineage associated genes during B cell differentiation in bone marrow and fetal liver. J Exp Med. 1993;178:951–960. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.3.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fleurant M, Changchien L, Chen CT, Flajnik MF, Hsu E. Shark Ig light chain junctions are as diverse as in heavy chains. J. Immunol. 2004;173:5574–5582. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nemazee D. Antigen receptor ‘capacity’ and the sensitivity of self-tolerance. Immunol Today. 1996;17:25–29. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80565-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Beck K, Peak MM, Ota T, Nemazee D, Murre C. Distinct roles for E12 and E47 in B cell specification and the sequential rearrangement of immunoglobulin light chain loci. J Exp Med. 2009;206:2271–2284. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Derudder E, Cadera EJ, Vahl JC, Wang J, Fox CJ, Zha S, van Loo G, Pasparakis M, Schlissel MS, Schmidt-Supprian M, Rajewsky K. Development of immunoglobulin lambda-chain-positive B cells, but not editing of immunoglobulin kappa-chain, depends on NF-kappaB signals. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:647–654. doi: 10.1038/ni.1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES