Defective heart chamber growth and myofibrillogenesis after knockout of adprhl1 gene function by targeted disruption of the ancestral catalytic active site

Stuart J Smith; Norma Towers; Kim Demetriou; Timothy J Mohun

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235433

. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0235433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235433

Defective heart chamber growth and myofibrillogenesis after knockout of adprhl1 gene function by targeted disruption of the ancestral catalytic active site

Stuart J Smith ^1,^*, Norma Towers ¹, Kim Demetriou ², Timothy J Mohun ^1,^*

Editor: Michael Klymkowsky³

PMCID: PMC7390403 PMID: 32726316

Abstract

ADP-ribosylhydrolase-like 1 (Adprhl1) is a pseudoenzyme expressed in the developing heart myocardium of all vertebrates. In the amphibian Xenopus laevis, knockdown of the two cardiac Adprhl1 protein species (40 and 23 kDa) causes failure of chamber outgrowth but this has only been demonstrated using antisense morpholinos that interfere with RNA-splicing. Transgenic production of 40 kDa Adprhl1 provides only part rescue of these defects. CRISPR/Cas9 technology now enables targeted mutation of the adprhl1 gene in G0-generation embryos with routine cleavage of all alleles. Testing multiple gRNAs distributed across the locus reveals exonic locations that encode critical amino acids for Adprhl1 function. The gRNA recording the highest frequency of a specific ventricle outgrowth phenotype directs Cas9 cleavage of an exon 6 sequence, where microhomology mediated end-joining biases subsequent DNA repairs towards three small in-frame deletions. Mutant alleles encode discrete loss of 1, 3 or 4 amino acids from a di-arginine (Arg271-Arg272) containing peptide loop at the centre of the ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase site. Thus despite lacking catalytic activity, it is the modified (adenosine-ribose) substrate binding cleft of Adprhl1 that fulfils an essential role during heart formation. Mutation results in striking loss of myofibril assembly in ventricle cardiomyocytes. The defects suggest Adprhl1 participation from the earliest stage of cardiac myofibrillogenesis and are consistent with previous MO results and Adprhl1 protein localization to actin filament Z-disc boundaries. A single nucleotide change to the gRNA sequence renders it inactive. Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3–4 are normal but production of the smaller ADPRHL1 species is unaffected, providing further evidence that cardiac activity is concentrated at the C-terminal protein portion.

1. Introduction

The embryonic heart forms as a simple, linear muscle tube that subsequently loops and is transformed by growth of the cardiac chambers that balloon out from regions of the tube's outer curvature [Reviewed 1,2]. At the level of the cardiomyocytes, chamber outgrowth occurs via an increase in cell size and coordinated changes in cell shape and directionality [3]. This is augmented by a localized resumption of cell proliferation and the continued addition of newly differentiated tissue to the ends of the tube (the heart poles) [4,5]. Directed hypertrophy determines the overall shape of a chamber while cell division is more evident during ballooning stages in mammalian hearts that undergo rapid increases in size [6]. Outgrowth occurs as the linear heart has already commenced peristaltic beating and zebrafish studies have shown that blood fluid forces can influence final chamber morphology by affecting cytoskeletal protein localization, cardiomyocyte maturation and also endocardial proliferation [7,8, Reviewed 9]. Underpinning the directed growth is myofibrillogenesis, the process of assembling the contractile protein machinery within the muscle cells.

Aquatic vertebrate species have two-chambered (fish) or three-chambered (amphibia) hearts featuring a single ventricle. Growth of the large ventricle within Xenopus tadpoles is sustained over a two month larval period, although the initial acquisition of form occurs within four days. It commences as a group of cardiomyocytes elongate within the heart tube and transiently align in a rosette pattern [10]. This rearrangement is biased to the left side, breaks the left-right symmetry and defines the position of the chamber apex. The chamber cells assemble myofibrils whose predominant trajectory will extend across the ventricle width. Their direction of muscle filament extension is essentially perpendicular with respect to circumference-axes imagined running from inner to outer curvature (or perpendicular to concentric lines encircling the primitive tube). As the ventricle shape develops, that alignment becomes perpendicular with regard base to chamber apex axes. For cardiomyocytes positioned further away from the apex, the angle of myofibril production is shifted progressively towards a parallel to circumference axes direction. As a consequence of the directed growth, the anterior wall of the ventricle has a left-sided origin, the posterior wall right-sided [11], plus the inflow and outflow poles are brought closer together to produce the classic heart-shape common to terrestrial animals. Inside the ventricle, ridges of trabeculae muscle form on the lumenal surface of anterior and posterior walls. Trabecular cardiomyocytes orient their myofibrils along the ventricle length (parallel to axes). The result is a layered chamber wall structure with a 'cross-grained' configuration of myofibrils.

Myofibrils initially form near the surface of muscle cells and hence, rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton in the cell cortex is a crucial early step. Whether these actin stress fibres act as temporary templates, or actually physically transition, during the production of muscle-type α-actin filaments with their uniform (sub-sarcomeric) length and opposed polarity remains an active topic of research [12 and refs therein]. The starting points for assembly are aggregations of α-actin and α-actinin 2 (termed Z-bodies) that associate with the cell membrane at integrin adhesion sites (proto-costameres) [Reviewed 13]. For recruitment of the motor proteins, intermediate steps involve incorporation of non-muscle myosin type II into filaments before it is then replaced by muscle myosin II protein to establish the correct sarcomere spacing [12,14]. There is a mutual dependency between proper formation of actin and myosin filaments in muscle, although recent experiments have observed part assembled components of each in the absence of the other structure [12,15]. Chaperones and co-chaperones such as Unc45b that facilitate folding of the myofilament proteins have been identified [Reviewed 16] and the number will likely increase, given the size and complexity of sarcomere architecture [Reviewed 17]. Models that describe these essential steps during myofibrillogenesis don't, however, address the timing and spatial requirements that are fundamental to cardiac chamber growth in the embryo. What determines the precise locations within the cardiomyocyte that initiate filament precursor association, when is this triggered in each cell and in which direction does myofibril assembly then proceed? It should be emphasized that the 'where, when and in which direction' questions surrounding cardiac myofibrils are equally pertinent to the prospects for stimulating repair of damaged adult (human) hearts as they are for studying normal embryonic chamber development.

One gene that exerts a profound effect on myofibril formation during the early stages of heart chamber growth is adprhl1, which encodes the protein ADP-ribosylhydrolase-like 1. By sequence similarity, Adprhl1 belongs to a small group of enzymes found in vertebrates that catalyse hydrolysis cleavage reactions involving ADP-ribosylated substrates [18,19]. Nevertheless, the familial active site differs in Adprhl1 and lacks the necessary amino acids required to support catalytic activity (see Discussion 4.2) [20,21]. Pseudoenzymes such as this can be a challenge to study, but there is gathering evidence that Adprhl1 may be an important factor in cardiogenesis.

In a series of experiments using Xenopus embryos, we first showed that heart-specific expression of adprhl1 mRNA was biased towards actively growing, chamber myocardium [10]. Expression is conserved in mouse embryo hearts and ADPRHL1 is also among the first mRNAs induced as human embryonic stem cells are differentiated in vitro towards a cardiac fate [22]. When adprhl1 activity was knocked down in Xenopus using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MO) that inhibit RNA-splicing, a consistent, severe heart defect occurred [10]. Hearts formed with small ventricles that could not beat. The number of cardiomyocytes present as ventricle formation commenced was not affected by the MO, nor was propagation of the electrical calcium signal across the inert ventricle and the expression of myofibrillar subunit genes was unaltered. Nonetheless, a sequence of myofibrillogenesis defects was observed, beginning with delayed cortical actin rearrangement and loss of cell elongation at the presumptive ventricle apex. The few myofibrils that did eventually form in the ventricle remained short and disarrayed, with no consistent trajectory of growth, and the overall result was a wholesale failure to the cellular architecture of the chamber.

In normal tadpoles, our Adprhl1-specific antibody identified two cardiac proteins of 40 and 23 kDa size. The larger protein matched the expected translation product from adprhl1 exons 1 to 7, but the precise composition of the smaller species was unknown, despite its abundance increasing as chamber development proceeded. Significantly, both proteins were lost from heart extracts of MO injected embryos. Stimulating 40 kDa Adprhl1 production using cardiac-specific transgenes was potent and triggered severe myofibril structural abnormalities as if excessive formation of Z-disc precursors had occurred [10]. Recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 that included an N-terminal epitope tag additionally showed a direct association with myofibrils that the antibody could not detect. In some linear myofibrils, this Adprhl1 localized to two clear stripes on either side of the Z-disc and also a diffuse stripe at the H-zone of the sarcomere, potentially marking the boundaries of actin filaments. Overall, the Xenopus experiments describe a gene that is fundamentally required for proper cardiac myofibrillogenesis and ventricle growth, possibly through a physical interaction of Adprhl1 with nascent actin filaments. Nonetheless, the picture is complicated by the presence of two distinct sized Adprhl1 proteins in the heart, with the variant that most resembles the ADP-ribosyl-acceptor hydrolase family limited by strict constraints on its synthesis and exerting an adverse effect on Z-disc structure (see Results 3.2).

In four subsequent years, there has been just a single report that linked a missense sequence variation in the human ADPRHL1 locus to a specific clinical defect of the left ventricle through a genome-wide association study (GWAS) [23]. No other gene knockdown or knockout in other experimental model animal species has yet validated adprhl1 function during heart development. Because our understanding of adprhl1 is over-reliant on the results of MO experiments, we have turned to CRISPR/Cas9 technology in order to induce mutations across the Xenopus adprhl1 gene. Co-injection of synthetic guide-RNA (gRNA) and Cas9 endonuclease into one-cell stage X. laevis embryos cuts double-strand DNA breaks (DSB) at the targeted sequence with 100% efficiency. It is the nature of the attempted repairs made to the DSB that determine whether alleles of the gene retain function or are inactivated. In G0-generation animals, there is also mosaic cellular distribution of the resulting alleles. Hence, a search for defective embryonic phenotypes by testing different gRNAs distributed throughout adprhl1 exons is actually a screen for essential positions where sequence variations including in-frame mutations are not tolerated.

We identify a sequence within exon 6 of adprhl1 where targeted mutation causes small in-frame deletions and produces tadpoles with dysfunctional cardiac ventricles. At the level of myofibrillogenesis, the malformations are remarkably consistent with previous MO work. Crucially, this region of exon 6 encodes a di-arginine motif unique to Adprhl1 that is situated within the ancestral active site cleft of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase family. We discuss the relationship between Adprhl1, ADP-ribosylation pathways and the further link to actin polymerization in order to consider the role of Adprhl1 in the heart. Finally, in mice carrying a partial deletion of the Adprhl1 gene, we examine cardiac ADPRHL1 protein production to show that for mammals at least, selective loss of the 40 kDa form has no adverse effect on cardiogenesis. Results from each species complement each other and point to where critical residues for Adprhl1 action are located.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Tyrosinase gRNA sequences

Two gRNAs were previously designed against both X. laevis tyrosinase homeologous alleles [24]. Their gene-specific sequences correspond to the tyr DNA listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Tyrosinase gRNA sequences.

tyra-T:	`5’-GGGTCGATGATAGAGAGGAC`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
tyrb-T:	`5’-GGCCCGTAGCAGAGCTGGTG`	direction: ←, PAM: AGG

Open in a new tab

2.2. Adprhl1 gRNA sequences

The adprhl1 sequences used to design the principal gRNAs used in the study are listed in Table 2. Mismatched bases of control gRNAs are in bold font.

Table 2. Principal adprhl1 gRNA sequences.

gAdprhl1-e3-1S:	`5’-GGGATGAGATACTGGAAACC`	direction: →, PAM: AGG
gAdprhl1-e3-1L:	`5’-GGGATGAAATACTGGAAACC`	direction: →, PAM: AGG
gAdprhl1-e4-1:	`5’-GGGCCGTGCACAGGGACCCA`	direction: ←, PAM: AGG
gAdprhl1-e6-1:	`5’-GAGGGAAGAGGGGGAAGAAG`	direction: →, PAM: AGG
gAdprhl1-e6-1Mis1:	`5’-GAGGGAAGAGGGGGAACAAG`	direction: →, PAM: AGG
gAdprhl1-e6-1Mis2:	`5’-GAGGGAAGAGGGGGAACTAG`	direction: →, PAM: AGG

Open in a new tab

Additional adprhl1 gRNAs were also tested for activity, some with longer 21–22 nucleotides of gene-specific sequence (Table 3). Mismatched 5’-bases added to enable efficient T7-transcription are underlined.

Table 3. Additional adprhl1 gRNA sequences.

gAdprhl1-e1-1:	`5’-GGCAAGAAGAGCTAAAACAACT`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e1-2:	`5’-GGTGAGACTAGTGATTCCGCTG`	direction: ←, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e2-1:	`5’-GGCACACCCCATTCAATGAAAA`	direction: →, PAM: AGG
gAdprhl1-i2-1L:	`5’-GGAAAGCACTTAGTGACCAG`	direction: ←, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-i2-2L:	`5’-GGGAATGTAATAAAAATTAG`	direction: ←, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e4-2S:	`5’-GGAGAAACCACTTGCTCAGTG`	direction: →, PAM: GGG
gAdprhl1-e4-2L:	`5’-GGAAAAACCACTTGTTCAGTG`	direction: →, PAM: GGG
gAdprhl1-e4-3S:	`5’-GGAAGAAGACTATACGGCACA`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e4-3L:	`5’-GGAAGAAGACTATTCGGCACA`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e5-1S:	`5’-GGTTTTATTTTGAAGCCAAG`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e5-1L:	`5’-GGTTTTATTTTGAAACCAAG`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e7-1S:	`5’-GCAGGAGAAGGTGGTGCCAC`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e7-1L:	`5’-GCAGGAGAAGGTGGTGCTAC`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e7-2S:	`5’-GGTGTCTTTATGGATTGCTCTA`	direction: →, PAM: TGG
gAdprhl1-e7-2L:	`5’-GGTGTCTGTATGGATTGCTCTA`	direction: →, PAM: TGG

Open in a new tab

-e5-1 (S and L) fits the optimal gRNA consensus but gave consistently poor synthesis yields due to an adverse T-repeat sequence and could not be assessed by injection into embryos.

Current computational tools used to predict off-target activity of gRNAs have difficulty advancing beyond sequence alignment complementarity towards identifying those potential off-targets that are likely to be cleaved in vivo [Reviewed 25]. Here, all gRNA sequences were assessed for hybridization at other positions using Xenbase (www.xenbase.org/, RRID:SCR_003280) [26], the JGI X. laevis genome v9.2 [27] and Cas-Offinder [28], which considered the potential for both sequence mismatches and bulges. Results for potential off-targeting by the most active gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA to other gene coding sequences are listed in the Supplementary Methods 5.2 in S1 Data. None of the additional genes would be anticipated to contribute to a heart phenotype if mutated and none of the potential interactions align with both of the homeologous alleles present in X. laevis.

2.3. Cas9 and gRNA injection into Xenopus laevis embryos

Preliminary experiments tested the activity of different Cas9 RNAs by co-injecting them with the two gRNAs that target tyrosinase. A mixture containing a Cas9 RNA (125 pg/nl) and the two gRNAs (both at 125 pg/nl) was prepared and 4 nl injected into one-cell stage embryos, giving a final 500 pg mass of each reagent. Injections were directed towards the animal pole of the embryo (uppermost third). Injection of embryos continued from 35 until 60 minutes post-fertilization. They were incubated at room temperature (22°C) until 90 mpf, then transferred to 17°C. Culture media used for injection and first 24 hours incubation was 0.1xNAM, 0.5% Ficoll^®-400, 20 μg/ml gentamycin. Thereafter, 0.1xNAM was used.

Greater efficiency of tyrosinase and adprhl1 gene knockout was achieved using a commercial Cas9 protein preparation, EnGen^® Spy Cas9 NLS (NEB: M0646M). In this case, gRNAs were preloaded onto Cas9 protein using a mixture assembled in the following order: 1 μl 1.3 M KCl (302 mM final), 2 μl gRNA (<1 μg of a single gRNA, so <233 pg/nl final) and 1.3 μl EnGen Cas9 (26 pmol). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes, immediately prior to injection. Injection of 4 nl mixture and subsequent embryo culture was as before. The method was adapted from Burger et al [29]. For tyrosinase knockout, the phenotype classes used to define the extent of pigmentation-loss are described in S7 Fig and follow those of Guo et al [30].

For adprhl1 knockout, embryos that gastrulated normally were allowed to develop to tadpole stage 44. Their external morphology was recorded each day and the appearance of their heart closely monitored. Tadpoles were assigned to one of four distinct phenotype classes, which differed slightly from those used to assess morpholino injection (see Supplementary Methods 5.12 in S1 Data):

Heart defect 1—inert ventricle. As per MO study.

Heart defect 2—thin wall ventricle. In tadpoles showing a cardiac oedema that produced a beating heart, the ventricle was frequently thin-walled and became increasingly dilated by stage 44. This was especially true for embryos that received the exon 6 -e6-1 gRNA.

Other malformations. Any non-cardiac developmental defect visible externally by stage 44, however subtle.

Normal (heart) morphology. Perfect development through to stage 44.

2.4. Sanger sequence analysis of mosaic adprhl1 exon 3, 4 and 6 mutations in G0-generation X. laevis

DNA was extracted from individual tadpoles. Frozen tissue was mixed with 200 μl 50 mM Tris pH8.8, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Tween20 containing freshly added 600 μg/ml proteinase K and incubated at 55°C for 20 hours. PCR amplification of adprhl1 genomic sequences used Platinum SuperFi DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) and 1 μl tadpole extract per 30 μl reaction. Plasmid clone isolates of amplicon DNA were prepared using a Zero Blunt^TM TOPO^TM PCR cloning kit (K287520, Invitrogen) and their inserts were sequenced. Sanger sequencing allowed study of 2 kbp amplicons so that the presence of larger deletions and insertions could be detected. The PCR primers used for genotyping are listed in Supplementary Methods 5.7 in S1 Data.

Each mutated sequence was assigned a genotype score (a number code) according to the size of the amino acid lesion that it encoded. This classification of mosaic mutations found within an individual tadpole was then compared against its cardiac morphology. Some assumptions were made for sequence deletions that disrupted exon splice junctions. Where a splice acceptor site was lost, it was assumed the exon was skipped. Where a splice donor sequence was removed, it was assumed the following intron was inappropriately retained.

Genotype score codes.

01: Inactive mutant. Frame-shift-stop or nonsense mutation.
02: In-frame mutant causing more than 20 amino acid changes.
03: In-frame mutant causing between 11–20 amino acid changes.
04: In-frame mutant causing 6–10 amino acid changes.
05: In-frame mutant causing 1–5 amino acid changes.
06: Normal amino acid sequence.

2.5. Amplicon-EZ (NGS) sequence analysis of mosaic adprhl1 exon 6 mutations

The Amplicon-EZ next generation sequencing service (Genewiz) was used as a cost-effective method to obtain deeper coverage of the mosaic exon 6 mutations from individual tadpoles, providing 50,000 reads per sample. Genomic PCRs obtained with primers p2560+p2648 were sequenced directly using Illumina^® technology. The Galaxy web platform (www.usegalaxy.eu) was used to assemble sequence reads (see Supplementary Methods 5.8 in S1 Data) [31]. The control 413/404 bp amplicons of the adprhl1 S- and L-alleles were used as reference sequences. The total number of assembled reads recorded for each tadpole counted only those mapped with reverse strand orientation as the -e6-1 gRNA sequence occurred towards the 3’- of the PCR product. Variants were assessed within a 15 bp sequence that included the PAM (5’-GGGGGAAGAAGAGGA). A wild-type read was defined as having the normal translated peptide sequence ²⁶⁹GGRRG²⁷³.

2.6. Western blot detection of Adprhl1 protein

Adprhl1 protein was detected using a rabbit antibody raised against an ADPRHL1 peptide (mouse ²⁴⁸DNYDAEERDKTYKKWSSE²⁶⁵, encoded by exons 5–6) [10]. The antibody is active against the Xenopus, mouse and human species orthologs. For protein extraction from embryonic Xenopus hearts, typically 100 hearts were dissected, pooled, snap frozen, homogenized in 120 μl RIPA buffer and boiled with an equal volume of 2x reducing protein sample buffer. Individual adult female mouse hearts were homogenized in 400 μl RIPA, the resulting slurry mixed with 400 μl sample buffer, then aliquots diluted a further three-fold with RIPA/sample buffer before SDS-PAGE.

2.7. Immunocytochemistry of Xenopus hearts

Immunocytochemistry was performed on whole tadpoles and subsequently the hearts were dissected, mounted in 12 μl CyGEL Sustain (biostatus) and viewed using Zeiss LSM5-Pascal or LSM710 confocal microscopes. Confocal images of whole hearts captured 2 μm deep optical sections. Both the ventricle myocardial wall and also deeper trabecular layers were assessed by scanning different depths. Images of cardiomyocytes and myofibrils were 1 μm optical sections, at a depth 1–2 μm below the outer (apical) myocardial surface. Antibodies used were Adprhl1, Myosin A4.1025 (DSHB) and phospho-Histone H3(Ser10) 3H10 (Sigma), along with fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Atto 633-conjugated phalloidin (Sigma) stained actin filaments. Dying cells were visualized with the ApopTag^® Red In Situ Apoptosis Detection kit (Sigma).

2.8. Animals

Transgenic Xenopus and Adprhl1^em1(IMPC)H allele (em1) mice were maintained at The Francis Crick Institute, according to the Home Office UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under the Project Licence of Timothy Mohun. All Xenopus embryos were culled before reaching protected status (at or prior to developmental stage 44). Reversible anaesthesia of Xenopus embryos used 0.015% ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulphonate (MS-222) in buffered 0.1xNAM. Terminal anaesthesia used 0.4% MS-222. Mice were bred, born and weaned at room temperature and maintained on a 12-hour light-dark cycle. Mice were housed in groups of four and fed a standard diet (2018s, Envigo). Mice were anaesthetised with 1.5–2.0% isoflurane in 2 L/min oxygen and euthanized by isoflurane. Mice were handled by experienced experimenters to minimize any eventual distress. Mouse genotyping PCR primers are detailed in Supplementary Methods 5.16 in S1 Data.

3. Results

3.1. Current understanding of Adprhl1 function relies on RNA-splice interfering morpholinos

Our previous experiments explored the role of Adprhl1 during heart chamber formation in Xenopus embryos. Expression of adprhl1 mRNA is restricted to the heart myocardium and select ocular muscles, in contrast to the multiple tissues that stain for the founding member of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase family, adprh (Fig 1A and 1B). We knocked down adprhl1 activity using morpholino oligonucleotides that target RNA-splicing. The Adprhl1-e2i2MO caused retention of intron 2 while -i2e3MO induced exon 3 skipping [10]. For both MOs, this led to a wholesale loss of adprhl1 mRNA abundance as measured by wholemount in situ hybridization (Fig 1D and 1F). Our Adprhl1-specific antibody identified two cardiac proteins of 40 and 23 kDa size and both were lost from heart extracts of MO injected embryos [10]. Thus RNA-splice interfering MOs have defined activities and cause a well-documented defect in embryonic cardiogenesis by stage 40. The ventricle remains small and inert (Fig 1C and 1E), with oedema developing beyond stage 41. In reviewing earlier work, it should also be noted that the antibody, when used for immunocytochemistry, could not detect Adprhl1 protein in the heart above background levels of signal. This reflected the low endogenous production of cardiac Adprhl1 that occurs in situ. Vertebrate gene alignments of adprhl1 now also include predicted transcripts containing an additional 3’-exon 8 (S1A Fig). This long exon showed little expression in the forming heart (S1J and S1K Fig), although suitably large 100 kDa Adprhl1 protein species have been detected in tadpole gut tissue.

Fig 1 — **A, B:** Comparison of *adprh* and *adprhl1* mRNA expression. A stage 34 tadpole (left-lateral view, A) shows principal sites of *adprh* expression, with the position of detail images marked by white squares. Mucus producing small secretory epidermal cells (orange arrows) contain *adprh* from stage 28 (see Discussion 4.2) [47], detection in somites (white arrow) resolves towards hypaxial (ventral) muscle groups by stage 38, transient expression occurs in nephrostomes of the pronephros (cyan arrow), plus otic vesicle (green arrow), pharyngeal arches and the brain. A stage 40 tadpole (B, plus a stage 34 detail image) shows strong *adprhl1* mRNA expression in the heart myocardium and also in the eyes within two forming muscle blocks, located medially (anterior) and at superior (upper) and inferior (lower) positions (white arrows). **C-H:** *adprhl1* RNA-splice interfering MOs provide a defined activity and inert heart phenotype. **C, D:** Expression of *actc1* (heart and skeletal muscle, C) and *adprhl1* (D) mRNAs in stage 40 tadpoles after injection of 32 ng Adprhl1-e2i2MO at the one-cell stage. Impaired heart ventricle growth and a loss of *adprhl1* mRNA signal is observed. Left-lateral view of tadpole and detail ventral view of heart region presented. **E, F:** Identical heart phenotype caused by injection of the distinct Adprhl1-i2e3MO morpholino. **G, H:** Normal ventricle size and *adprhl1* signal in non-injected sibling tadpoles. Red arrows denote aberrant morphology. H, heart; A, atrium; V, ventricle. I: Transcript and protein composition for 40 kDa Adprhl1. Alignment of a RefSeq mRNA (NM_001093322.1) to the X. *laevis adprhl1* S-homeologous locus showing exon and intron sizes. The lower drawing shows the contribution of each coding exon to the translated protein and highlights the position of the peptide antibody epitope (yellow rectangle) and of the conserved di-arginine sequence (red rectangle) mutated in this study. For reference, other sequences that reside within the ancestral active site are also marked (black). S1A Fig describes all the predicted transcripts from both S- and L-alleles while S16 Fig compares mammalian *Adprhl1* mRNAs.

3.2. Combining morpholino knockdown with transgenic 40 kDa over-expression experiments reveals a complexity to Adprhl1 action

Using a cardiac-Gal4/UAS system, we also produced a series of transgenes to drive over-expression from adprhl1 cDNAs. They actually revealed strict translational control operating in the heart that must act to restrict the synthesis of the endogenous 40 kDa Xenopus Adprhl1 protein [10]. In fact, the only way to achieve additional Adprhl1 production was to engineer changes to the transgene 5’-cDNA sequence adjacent to the translation initiating ATG. One transgene exchanged the 5’-most 156 bp for the corresponding coding sequence from human-species ADPRHL1 cDNA (Tg[UAS:human^1-52-Xenopus^53-354 adprhl1]). It escaped the regulation and encodes a human-Xenopus hybrid Adprhl1 containing 21 amino acid substitutions compared to the native Xenopus protein. A second transgene incorporated silent nucleotide changes (synonymous substitutions) within the Xenopus coding sequence (Tg[UAS:Xenopus adprhl1(silent 1-282bp)]). This only partially evaded the endogenous control such that recombinant Adprhl1 accumulated transiently in a fraction of the cardiomyocytes. Nonetheless, it does offer the advantage that its translated protein remains identical to natural Xenopus Adprhl1.

The activity of both transgenes was unaffected by the RNA-splice interfering MOs. We examined whether recombinant Adprhl1 proteins could rescue the MO defects in tadpoles, in particular the assembly of myofibrils and morphology of the resulting ventricle chamber. These experiments are presented in S2 Fig, with a concise version showing the key panels reproduced as Fig 2. Only a limited recovery of cardiac myofibril assembly is possible when using recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 protein.

Experiments that combine *adprhl1* MO knockdown with two distinct transgenes engineered to achieve *adprhl1* over-expression. This is the concise version of S2 Fig. For brevity, Fig 2 presents only the high magnification (D and E) images that reveal ventricle wall myofibril patterns within the experimental hearts. The extended figure additionally includes the morphology of each ventricle, the extent of Adprhl1 protein production within, plus squares to locate the position of the myofibril images within each ventricle. **A, B:** Cardiomyocytes within the heart ventricle wall (anterior surface) of a stage 41 tadpole that was injected with the RNA-splice interfering MO, Adprhl1-e2i2MO, into dorsal (D-2/4) blastomeres. Additionally, it carried binary transgenes to over-express recombinant Adprhl1 protein, consisting of Tg[myl7:Gal4] driver and the Tg[UAS:human^1-52-Xenopus^53-354 adprhl1] responder. Scale bar = 5 μm (all panels). Fluorescence image (A) shows anti-Adprhl1 immunocytochemistry (green), anti-myosin (red) and DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). The second panel (B) displays a merge of myosin and phalloidin actin stain, with the phalloidin coloured green to evaluate signal overlap. **C, D:** Ventricle cardiomyocytes from a sibling tadpole that received the same Adprhl1-e2i2MO injection but carried only the UAS-responder transgene and hence did not produce excess recombinant Adprhl1. **E, F:** A double transgenic sibling that synthesized recombinant human-*Xenopus* hybrid Adprhl1 but was not injected with the MO. **G, H:** Ventricle cardiomyocytes from a second experiment, a stage 42 tadpole that was injected with Adprhl1-e2i2MO and carried the Tg[myl7:Gal4] driver but a different Tg[UAS:Xenopus adprhl1(silent 1-282bp)] responder transgene. This incorporates silent nucleotide changes (synonymous substitutions) to the cDNA sequence in order to partially evade endogenous translational regulation. **I, J:** Ventricle cardiomyocytes of a double transgenic, silent mutation, sibling tadpole that synthesized recombinant *Xenopus* Adprhl1 but was not injected with the MO. **K, L:** A non-injected sibling control harbouring only the silent mutation responder transgene that did not produce excess recombinant Adprhl1. Paired white arrowheads indicate Z-disc sarcomere positions, orange arrowheads denote non-striated filaments. V, ventricle; OT, outflow tract.

After injection of Adprhl1-e2i2MO into dorsal blastomeres, the resulting small ventricle revealed severely disrupted myofibrillogenesis, with actin fixed at the cell cortex and no sarcomere striations evident in either myosin or actin filaments (S2#2A-2E Fig, or Fig 2C and 2D, orange arrowheads). Separately, in the heart expressing the human-Xenopus hybrid, clusters of cardiomyocytes with strong Adprhl1 signals occurred adjacent to regions with more modest production (S2#3A-3E Fig, or Fig 2E and 2F). Fewer bright cells contributed to the ventricle apex region (S2#3B Fig). Over-expression of hybrid Adprhl1 altered myofibril patterns even in the absence of the MO. There was greater disarray to the myofibril orientation and thinner actin filaments were observed (Fig 2E and 2F, arrowheads). By combining the two interventions, the uncontrolled synthesis of 40 kDa hybrid Adprhl1 in hearts where the MO had removed endogenous Adprhl1 production did not rescue normal cardiac development and the small hearts remained inert (S2#1A-1E Fig, Fig 2A and 2B). Indeed, the first signs of oedema could be detected at stage 41 in tadpoles that received the MO (S2#1A, 2A Fig). Nonetheless, myofibril assembly did actually occur within cells where lower levels of recombinant Adprhl1 were detected (Fig 2A and 2B). Myofibrils extended in the perpendicular direction that is necessary to support proper ventricle chamber growth [10]. Sarcomeres were evident in both myosin and actin filaments suggesting a functional maturity of the myofibrils (Fig 2A and 2B, arrowheads).

With the transgene containing silent mutations, scarce ventricular cells containing excess 40 kDa Adprhl1 had profoundly affected myofibrillogenesis (S2#5A-5E Fig, Fig 2I and 2J). Their dense network of thin, striated myofibrils linked together by branch points at every Z-disc suggested excessive formation of Z-disc precursor structures (Fig 2I and 2J). They contrasted with the mature myofibrils found within adjacent control cardiomyocytes (Fig 2I and 2J, also Fig 2K and 2L). Once again, a functional rescue of the MO phenotype was not achieved by this transgene as it yielded too few cells synthesizing recombinant Xenopus Adprhl1 (S2#4A-4E Fig, Fig 2G and 2H). Yet despite the widespread disarray in the heart presented, sarcomeres in myofibrils formed emanating from (or adjacent to) the sole ventricular cardiomyocyte containing detectable Adprhl1 protein (Fig 2G and 2H, arrowheads).

In summary, loss of Adprhl1 halts cardiogenesis while 40 kDa over-production is potent and triggers severe myofibril structural abnormalities. A full rescue of the MO defect is not achieved with the 40 kDa protein, although cortical actin turnover and some myofibril assembly can be restored. The natural control of Adprhl1 synthesis is far more sophisticated than current transgene technology. Thus, a clean rescue would require further understanding of Adprhl1 primary sequence and function, the relative contributions of both the 40 kDa and 23 kDa forms of Adprhl1, plus the mechanism for translational regulation to be determined. Nonetheless it is clear that altering Adprhl1 levels has serious consequences for myofibrillogenesis during heart formation.

Other features of the adprhl1 transgenes are summarized in S3 and S4 Figs. The cardiomyocytes producing recombinant Xenopus Adprhl1 were viable cells. They were not unusually mitotic and nor were they dying (S4 Fig). Moreover, for the hybrid Adprhl1 at least, translation of 40 kDa Adprhl1 did not lead to a consequent increase in 23 kDa Adprhl1 abundance, suggesting the latter is not a processed fragment of the former (S3 Fig).

3.3. Limitations of adprhl1 morpholinos—Contrast between RNA-splicing versus translation inhibition

One way to determine the role of the 40 kDa Adprhl1 would be to utilize MOs that specifically inhibit translation initiation of this protein form. As a pseudo-tetraploid species, Xenopus laevis has separate loci for adprhl1 arranged on distinct S- and L-homeologous copies of chromosome 2 [26,27]. However, each of three overlapping MOs covering both S- and L-allele sequences surrounding the 5’-most AUG of adprhl1 mRNA caused unforeseen defective tail growth observed from stage 32 (S5, S6F and S6G Figs). Cardiac ventricle growth was clearly impaired in these tadpoles (S6F and S6G Fig) and heart tissue showed loss of 40 kDa Adprhl1, but this was overshadowed by the other prominent malformations. The potential of using MOs to identify a translation initiation site for the 23 kDa Adprhl1 protein was also explored, but did not provide convincing answers (see S5 and S6H–S6O Figs). It is not clear whether the translation inhibition MOs simply have poor specificity for adprhl1 or if additional early effects on maternally-derived transcripts occur. For now, the previously published RNA-splice interfering MOs remain the only antisense reagents that achieve a clean cardiac adprhl1 knockdown with an efficiency close to a null phenotype.

Yet the questions posed by adprhl1 require more precise dissection than can be achieved by gene knockdown experiments alone. The MO work could never reveal sub-domains within Adprhl1 that are necessary for its function. It was for this reason we turned to CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate mutations across the Xenopus adprhl1 locus. By studying the consequences of mutation at defined points within the gene, it was hoped critical amino acids would be identified in Adprhl1 that support ordered myofibril assembly in the heart.

3.4. Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 gene mutation for phenotype discovery in X. laevis embryos using tyrosinase knockout

Harnessing the activity of the bacterial adaptive immunity system of CRISPR and Cas genes has revolutionised efforts to introduce precise, targeted changes to the genomes of cells and experimental model animals [Reviewed 32,33]. The key to its success is the simplicity by which the Cas9 endonuclease can be programmed to cut a specific DNA sequence using a synthetic guide-RNA [34]. Endogenous genome repair mechanisms will rejoin any double-strand break (DSB) that occurs within the cell nucleus. If no intact copy of the targeted DNA is available to direct an accurate repair, non-homologous end-joining will result in a sequence lesion at the site of Cas9 cleavage, such as base pair deletion or insertion [35,36]. If a modified DNA template is provided, then precise gene editing can even be achieved, say to replicate a defined mutation that is observed in human disease.

In order to optimize a method for CRISPR experiments in Xenopus, like many studies [24,30], we used knockout of the tyrosinase embryo pigmentation gene to test several Cas9 RNAs along with a commercial Cas9 protein preparation in X. laevis (S7 Fig, Supplementary Methods 5.1–5.6 in S1 Data). Cas9 RNA injection achieved 46% of tadpoles that were complete albinos or contained just a few pigmented cells (S7A–S7C Fig). Significantly, by switching to EnGen^® Spy Cas9 protein and preloading the tyr gRNAs, the proportion of completely albino tadpoles was increased beyond 80%, confirming the enhanced effectiveness of protein injection compared to RNA for one-cell stage delivery of the nuclease activity (S7A and S7B Fig). This rate of tyr albinism far exceeded what had been previously recorded for G0-generation tadpoles.

3.5. Identification of adprhl1 gRNAs that cause defective heart development

For knockout phenotype discovery in G0-generation animals, the position of the gRNA within the targeted gene is paramount. The tyr gRNAs, for example, hybridize near the start of the coding sequence. At this site, frame-shift mutations produce non-functional alleles while subtler in-frame mutations disturb the N-terminal signal sequence of the tyrosinase enzyme. With the adprhl1 gene, it was unclear where good positions to site gRNAs might be located. The existence of two protein species cast doubt on targeting the consensus 5’-coding region while its current status as a pseudoenzyme undermined the potential of gRNA hybridization to sequences that encode the ancestral site for ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity. A naïve approach was taken with gRNAs designed to each exon of the adprhl1 gene, while two were chosen specifically to probe the importance of the active site cleft (-e6-1 and -e7-1). The effect of adprhl1 gRNA plus Cas9 injection on embryo and cardiac morphology is summarized in Fig 3 (and S8 Fig).

Fig 3 — A: Diagram showing the hybridization position of gRNAs in relation to exons of the X. *laevis adprhl1* locus. Separate gRNAs for S- and L-homeologous alleles were prepared if sequence differences existed between the two at the selected location. Arrows indicate the 5’-3’ direction of each gRNA. Red arrows denote gRNAs whose activities were further examined by sequencing mutant allele DNA. Black arrow gRNAs have their effects on embryo development presented in this figure while grey gRNAs feature in S8 Fig. The table lists the *adprhl1*-specific sequence of each gRNA along with its protospacer-associated motif (PAM). Mismatched bases of control gRNAs are coloured red. Mismatched 5’-bases added to enable gRNA transcription from plasmid template DNA are coloured blue. Note -e5-1 (S and L) targeting exon 5 gave poor synthesis yields (Materials and Methods 2.2). B: Effect of *adprhl1* gRNAs plus Cas9 on embryo development. Parts-of-whole charts showing the frequency of stage 44 tadpole phenotypes that occurred after injection of gRNA along with Cas9 protein into one-cell stage embryos. Red rectangles surround charts for the principal gRNAs whose activities were also examined by DNA sequencing. Green rectangles denote control gRNAs and also a chart presenting the cumulative total for non-injected sibling tadpoles assessed from the experiments. The lower right chart shows the consequence of injecting a mixture of gRNAs to target adjacent intron 2—exon 3 regions of the *adprhl1* gene (additional combinatorial gRNA experiments are shown in S8 Fig). Heart defects were detected at higher frequency using the gAdprhl1-e3-1 and in particular the -e6-1 gRNA. Images showing representative tadpoles after gAdprhl1-e6-1 mutation are shown in Fig 6.

There was wide variation in the ability of the different gRNAs to disturb heart formation. Many gRNAs had modest effects, with only a few tadpoles in an injected cohort (<15%) developing cardiac oedema. Nonetheless, two gRNAs did induce oedema and heart ventricle malformations. The gAdprhl1-e3-1 gRNA produced a 30% rate of tadpole heart defects while the most active, gAdprhl1-e6-1, caused a cardiac malformation in over 43% of tadpoles (Fig 3B). The type of abnormality was also consistent amongst affected tadpoles. Hearts produced after -e6-1 gRNA injection typically could beat but developed a small, thin-walled ventricle (see Results 3.10, Fig 6C and 6D) that became increasingly dilated as the tadpole grew. The observed phenotype frequency was lower for adprhl1 compared to that obtained for tyrosinase gene knockout, but did approach the activity of the adprhl1 RNA-splice interfering MOs when they were injected at the one-cell stage. Moreover, aside from the heart, no other morphological defects were observed consistently in tadpole cohorts (Results 3.10, Figs 6A–6D, 7A and 7I). The apparent activity of gAdprhl1-e6-1 was exciting, since this gRNA was one of the two designed to probe the ancestral active site. It hybridized to an exon 6 sequence that encodes a loop between two helices in the substrate binding cleft (see Discussion 4.2).

Fig 6 — **A, B:** Expression of *actc1* (heart and skeletal muscle, A) and *adprhl1* (B) mRNAs in stage 34 tadpoles after *adprhl1* exon 6 mutation using the gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA plus Cas9. Left-lateral view of tadpole and detail left, right and ventral views of heart region presented. **C, D:** Older stage 39 tadpoles that received the same exon 6 mutation. **E, F:** Sibling non-injected stage 34 tadpoles. **G, H:** Sibling non-injected stage 39 tadpoles. By stage 39, exon 6 mutated tadpoles show ventricle defects and early signs of cardiac oedema. One ventricle (C) is displaced towards the right side of the tadpole and has a malformed apex region. The second ventricle (D) is also displaced and has a faint *adprhl1* signal, suggesting a thinner myocardial wall. Red arrows denote aberrant morphology. H, heart; L, R, V, left, right and ventral views.

Fig 7 — A: Developing cardiac oedema typical of a stage 40 tadpole after injection of the gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA plus Cas9. Left-lateral view of tadpole and detail of heart region presented. The oedema increased embryo transparency so that the small ventricle became visible at an earlier stage compared to controls. **B-D:** Fluorescence images of the dissected heart ventricle placed with the anterior surface uppermost (B) and displaying merged signals (C, D) of phalloidin actin filaments (green), anti-myosin filaments (red) and DAPI nuclei (blue). The white square (B) denotes the position of the ventricular cardiomyocytes (C) and the white square (C) in turn marks the further magnified image (D). The ventricle is small compared to controls. Cardiomyocytes either have few assembled muscle filaments or contain disarrayed myofibrils with poorly defined sarcomeres (arrowhead, D). Scale bars = 100 μm (B), = 10 μm (C) and = 5 μm (D). **E-H:** Non-injected sibling control stage 40 tadpole and dissected cardiac ventricle. The cardiomyocytes of the ventricle wall assemble myofibrils that extend in a perpendicular to chamber direction (horizontal in the image, H). Discrete sarcomeres are visible (arrowhead, H). I: A typical stage 42 tadpole mutated with the -e6-1 gRNA and Cas9. The cardiac oedema and small ventricle are the only overt malformations. **J-L:** The dissected heart has the anterior ventricle surface uppermost, while its aberrant shape positions the outflow tract to the left of the atria after mounting (J)(in controls, the outflow is folded in front of the atria). There is mosaicism amongst the ventricular cardiomyocyte population (K, L), with round non-functional cells (asterisk *, L) and also elongated cells containing disarrayed myofibrils (arrowhead, L). **M-P:** Non-injected sibling control stage 42 tadpole and dissected ventricle. The tadpole epidermis is now transparent allowing simple assessment of cardiac morphology (M). Myofibrils are packed together (O) and Z-disc stripes are prominent (arrowhead, P). **Q-T:** For comparison, a stage 40 tadpole and a dissected heart ventricle obtained after injection of the RNA-splice interfering Adprhl1-e2i2MO morpholino at the one-cell stage. This tadpole was probed for myocardial *myl7* mRNA and its epidermal pigment removed by bleaching. Left-lateral view and ventral detail (Q). The heart dissected from another MO injected tadpole is small (R), with myofibril disarray (S, arrowhead, T) that is comparable to the CRISPR targeted animals. Note, injection of the MO at the one-cell stage to match the CRISPR experiments yielded a slightly milder cardiac phenotype compared to the previous four-cell stage dorsal blastomere injections due to lower MO concentration apportioned to heart forming tissue (compare Fig 2C and 2D). Oed, oedema; H, heart; V, ventricle; OT, outflow tract; A, atria.

To determine why some gRNAs were more effective than others, we examined the adprhl1 genomic sequence surrounding gRNA targeted sites. We selected the -e3-1, -e4-1 and -e6-1 gRNAs for further analysis. Each of these gRNAs contained the optimal 20 nucleotides of gene-specific sequence and an identical adjacent PAM (Fig 3A). S- and L-homeolog adprhl1 DNA was PCR amplified from individual tadpoles that represented all the heart defect and normal morphology phenotypic groups. Sanger DNA sequencing of cloned isolates was then analysed for each gRNA experiment. Sequence results for the three targeted exons are presented in order. Moreover, direct next generation sequencing of a small PCR amplicon was also utilized for analysis of the most penetrant exon 6 mutation.

3.6. Exon 3 mutation reveals Cas9 endonuclease operating with 100% efficiency and cellular mosaicism of resulting alleles

We compared 342 sequences across exon 3 obtained from 23 tadpoles that had received the -e3-1(S+L) gRNA. Alignments revealed that every sequence contained a lesion at the gRNA hybridization position whereas all sequences from a non-injected control tadpole were wild type (S9 and S10A Figs). Small nucleotide deletions were most common, with some insertions and a missense mutation also observed. At this site, a mixture of two gRNA molecules prepared to both S- and L-loci had been used, resulting in both homeologs being effectively mutated (S10A Fig). Thus injection of CRISPR reagents at the early one-cell stage showed the Cas9 endonuclease operating reproducibly with 100% efficiency in Xenopus embryos. Within each tadpole, the number of distinct sequences provided an estimate of the rate of Cas9 action. The highest number detected was 6 different S-locus sequences, although four or fewer was more common (S10B Fig). This level of sequence complexity indicated DSB formation and subsequent repair continued beyond S-phase at the one-cell stage and occasionally occurred in separate blastomeres at the two-cell stage. Each injected tadpole therefore contained a mixture of differently mutated sequences and some mosaicism of allele distribution must have occurred across individual cells.

Cas9 cut the targeted DNA completely. Whether a tadpole would reveal a developmental defect due to adprhl1 gene inactivation depended on the specific details of the DNA strand repairs that occurred. To simplify presentation of the sequence data, a numerical code was assigned that graded each mutation according to the type and size of amino acid sequence modification it encoded (see Materials and Methods 2.4). This genotype score scale ranged from 01 for the most severe frame-shift and nonsense mutations, 02 to 05 for in-frame amino acid changes of decreasing size, with score 06 reserved for the natural Xenopus Adprhl1 primary sequence. After mutation by -e3-1 gRNA, over 85% of the sequences belonged to the 01 category that would truncate the full length protein product. These frame-shift mutations accounted for the majority of sequences found in tadpoles with heart defects, suggesting an intact exon 3 is an essential component of adprhl1 mRNA in Xenopus (S10A and S10B Fig).

More subtle, in-frame mutations were present at low frequency in most embryos. It was the nature of these mutations that actually correlated with the cardiac phenotype. For example, whenever the p.(Lys145Ile) missense substitution occurred, the tadpole had preserved a normal heart morphology (S10B Fig -see tadpoles#20170406004, #20170406024). The substitution must not affect Adprhl1 activity and therefore its presence in a (mosaic) proportion of the mutated cardiac progenitor cells enabled heart formation to proceed. We were less certain of the consequence of small amino acid deletions or insertions at this position. Triplet deletions may have preserved heart function whereas the presence of insertions was biased towards animals with defective hearts (see S10B Fig).

Overall, targeting adprhl1 exon 3 caused complete mutation and a 30% rate of developmental heart abnormalities. The presence of substitutions, in-frame deletions or insertions in nearly all embryos prevented a uniform defective knockout phenotype from prevailing at the G0-generation because some of these mutations retained activity. We did experiment with injecting additional gRNAs that hybridized close to -e3-1 to induce larger deletions between two neighbouring DSB positions (Fig 3A). This combinatorial gRNA approach was partially successful and did increase heart defect frequency (Fig 3B, S8 Fig), but only targeted the L-locus and never eliminated the genotype score 04–05 alleles (S10A Fig).

3.7. Exon 4 mutation is incomplete so rarely causes heart defects

We initially compared 93 sequences from 5 tadpoles that had received the -e4-1 gRNA. This time, specific lesions at the gRNA position were detected in only 82% of sequences and normal alleles persisted in each of the tadpoles (S11 and S13 Figs). Combinations of -e4-1 with adjacent -e4-2(S+L) or the more distant -e4-3(S+L) gRNAs were then tested (Fig 3A, S8 Fig). Alignment of a further 171 sequences showed the -e4-1 plus -e4-2 mixture induced deletions between the two DSB sites but again, a few wild-type sequences remained (S12 and S13A Figs). With two gRNAs, the frequency of heart abnormalities increased but never matched the level observed for exon 3 (S8 Fig).

3.8. Exon 6 mutation is biased towards in-frame repairs yet still causes the highest rate of heart defects

For exon 6, 500 DNA clones were examined from 16 tadpoles that had received the -e6-1 gRNA. Alignments showed 499 had defects at the gRNA site and just one retained a wild-type sequence (Fig 4, S14 Fig). The number of distinct sequences present within each tadpole was similar to that observed for exon 3 mutation (Fig 5B).

Fig 4 — Sanger cloned DNA sequences of *adprhl1* S-homeologous locus exon 6 after mutation by the gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA plus Cas9. Mutated sequences from the L-locus exon 6 are presented in S14 Fig. The gRNA position is shown by the red arrow placed above the expected sequence (top 2 rows, exon and genomic). Alignment of 251 (S-) DNA clones obtained from 16 tadpoles, with every sequence carrying a lesion at the gRNA binding site. Mutant nucleotide sequences are coloured red. A missense mutation is listed first, followed by deletions (red hyphens) and then insertions (red arrowheads). Frequently occurring sequences containing in-frame 3, 9 or 12 bp deletions are highlighted. The number of instances of each sequence is to the right, alongside its genotype score.

The most striking feature of targeting exon 6 was the disproportionately high, 69% frequency of in-frame mutations (Fig 5A). Sequences with 3, 9, or 12 bp deletions constituted over half of the in-frame mutated alleles and were found in all animals (Fig 4, S14 Fig). A 1 bp missense substitution, 6, 18 and 24 bp deletions, plus some 3 and 6 bp insertions were also identified. The common mutations corresponded to specific deletions of the Adprhl1 protein sequence (264SSEGRGGRRGH274): a single amino acid loss p.(Arg272del), loss of 3 aa p.(Arg271_Gly273del), or loss of 4 aa p.(Gly270_Gly273del) (Fig 5B). The stereotyped deletions resulted from the pattern of short direct repeats of nucleotide sequence found at this site that were utilized for cellular DSB repair by the microhomology mediated end-joining pathway (MMEJ or Alt-NHEJ) (Fig 5D) [36]. Each of the three common deletion mutations must have eliminated Adprhl1 activity and together, were responsible for the cardiac malformations caused by the -e6-1 gRNA. Even a conserved p.(Arg271Lys) substitution was obtained from a tadpole with a typically malformed ventricle, suggesting it too lacked function (Fig 5B-tadpole#20181121010).

The same in-frame deletions occurred in tadpoles with oedema and heart defects, but also in examples where the heart had apparently formed normally. One wild-type Sanger sequence was additionally detected in an animal with a normal heart (Fig 5B-tadpole#20181121024). We suspected that increasing the number of sequences at the gRNA site would reveal more wild-type alleles and explain the presence of the normal tadpoles in the experiment. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was employed to increase the depth of mutation analysis using a small PCR product for both the S- and L-loci (Materials and Methods 2.5). NGS reads contained the same prevalent mutations in the tadpoles that had been identified by Sanger sequencing, albeit with a higher level of sequence variant complexity. Additionally, of the 16 mutated tadpoles screened, wild-type alleles were detected in all 5 animals that had preserved a normal heart morphology but in only 3 of the 11 tadpoles with heart defects (Fig 5B). Of those three, given the mosaic distribution of mutations within the animals, if wild-type sequences persisted in ventral blastomere-derived tissues, they would not be able to contribute to cardiac development due to the ordered cell lineage hierarchy in Xenopus embryos [37].

There is a marked contrast between the results obtained for exon 6 mutation versus exon 3. At exon 3, the presence of in-frame mutations at low frequency can help protect heart formation. Whereas for exon 6, small in-frame deletions predominate and are actually responsible for the cardiac phenotype observed in 43% of the tadpoles. A model of Adprhl1 protein structure illustrates the position the exon 6 deleted amino acids should occupy within a loop of peptide backbone that lies at the centre of the ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase site (Fig 5C) [10]. Within this sub-domain, an interesting comparison can be made between different members of the (pfam03747) protein family. Where the active enzyme ADP-ribosylhydrolase (Adprh) has di-serine residues that interact with the adenosine-ribose moiety of a substrate ADP-ribosylated protein, in Adprhl1 these amino acids are instead changed to di-arginine (Adprh SYSGWGGSSGH, Adprhl1 264SSEGRGGRRGH274). The unique loop sequences of active enzyme versus cardiac pseudoenzyme are absolutely conserved across vertebrate species from frog to man (see Discussion 4.2, Fig 9A–9C). Thus the -e6-1 gRNA is effective because the targeted exon 6 sequence translates into a critical Adprhl1 di-arginine motif where amino acid changes are not tolerated. Crucially, it reveals that despite lacking catalytic activity, it is the active site of Adprhl1 that performs an essential role during embryonic cardiogenesis.

Fig 9 — **A-C:** Structural model of human ADPRHL1 with protein backbone drawn as a tube (A) and magnified active site region (B) [10] that is based on the solved crystal structure of human ADPRH (3HFW) (C-active site shown only) [43]. Amino acids that are common to both proteins are coloured magenta (A, B). White arrows indicate the contribution made by each *ADPRHL1* exon to the sequence, orange arrows highlight the positions encoded by the exon-2-3 and exon-4-5 boundaries, with yellow lines marking the remaining exon borders (A). The translated exon-2-3 and 4–5 boundaries reside close to each other and have parallel alignment. Thus a smaller 23 kDa ADPRHL1 form that lacks aa sequence from exons 3–4 could conceivably retain a similar protein fold. Select aa side chains within the active sites are shown as ball and sticks models. For active enzyme ADPRH, aspartates-55, 56, 302, 304 (Mg²⁺ coordination and catalysis), Cys129, Tyr263, serines-264, 269, 270 (substrate binding cleft) and the location of glycines-100, 127 are shown (C). A molecule of ADP occupies the active site, along with one of the two Mg²⁺ cations (green sphere) and a K⁺ ion (grey sphere) (C). For cardiac ADPRHL1, the corresponding active site residues are mostly changed. Asp57 (conserved and coloured red), Asn58, Glu302, Ala304 (no cation coordination), Phe130, Ser265, Glu266, arginines-271, 272 (changed substrate cleft), plus Asp100, Ser128 are shown (B). With this altered active site, ADP cannot be forcibly docked into the ADPRHL1 model. **D, E:** A deeper understanding of Adprhl1 action is required in order to describe how myofibrillogenesis is linked to chamber outgrowth in the embryo. This diagram illustrates several questions that will need to be addressed:**? -1:** What is the precise composition of the smaller 23 kDa Adprhl1 protein? The mouse *em1* allele has already provided some information. It does not contain exons 3–4 encoded sequence but will include exons 5–6 sequence recognised by the peptide antibody.? -2: What is the composition of the additional 25 kDa mouse Adprhl1 protein? It is likely to be related to the 23 kDa species.? -3: Which sequences localize Adprhl1 to Z-disc/actin filament barbed end boundaries and what myofibril components does it associate directly with? The localization is observed when using an N-terminal epitope tag but not with the exons 5-6-specific antibody. The epitope for the peptide antibody is possibly obscured when Adprhl1 associates with myofibrils.? -4: Might Adprhl1 cooperate with the chaperones and co-chaperones that fold and assemble actin filaments? GimC and TRiC are among factors known to contribute to actin dynamics. There are many additional components of the functional sarcomere unit of myofibrils that Adprhl1 could interact with.? -5: Does Adprhl1 retain binding activity for a post-translational modification that is related to ADP-ribose? For example, an ADP-ribose modification can be partially degraded to a smaller phospho-ribose group by a pyrophosphatase or phosphodiesterase reaction.? -6: Could the substrate binding clefts of Adprhl1 and Adprh also be targets for ADP-ribosylation? Comparison of the di-arginine versus di-serine residues present in the active sites of the two proteins. Di-arginine is common among verified sites for ADP-ribosylation on arginine side chains. Moreover, serine is another acceptor site for ADP-ribosylation that can be hydrolysed by the action of Adprhl2.? -7: Does the active enzyme Adprh contain sequences that provide specificity for particular target proteins, in addition to the binding and hydrolysis of ADP-ribosylated arginine? In the illustration, Adprh is depicted acting on ADP-ribosylated actin, one of a number of known (arginine acceptor) targets of bacterial toxin ADP-ribosyltransferases. Could domains adjacent to the active site help stabilize the interaction with particular modified target proteins. Might this be the activity that is common to both Adprh and Adprhl1.? -8: Could smaller protein forms of Adprh also exist, for example in skeletal muscle? There could yet be analogy between 23 kDa Adprhl1 action in cardiac muscle and Adprh in skeletal muscle. However, evidence against this comparison would be that exon structure is not conserved between the two family members.

3.9. A single nucleotide change to the exon 6 gRNA sequence abolishes its activity

Hybridization between the Cas9-gRNA complex and the target DNA site is essential for double-strand endonuclease digestion. Annealing of the gene-specific element of the gRNA (the spacer region) to its target, the opposite DNA strand to the PAM-containing strand, proceeds in a 3’ to 5’- direction (away from the PAM sequence). A perfect match of the 8–10 bases at the 3’-portion of the gRNA spacer (known as the seed sequence) is absolutely required for successful cleavage and the DSB occurs 3–4 bp upstream of the PAM [38,39]. In order to demonstrate the specificity of the interaction required for adprhl1 mutation, we synthesized two control exon 6 gRNAs that contained a single or double nucleotide mismatch located at the putative DSB site (Fig 3A). These control gRNAs injected under identical conditions exerted no effect on heart formation and the resulting tadpoles developed completely normally (Fig 3B).

3.10. Myofibril assembly defects observed in adprhl1 exon 6 mutated hearts

After identifying the mutations produced within adprhl1 exon 6, we next examined the aberrant heart phenotypes of the affected tadpoles in finer detail. Heart formation was monitored on five consecutive days from stage 34 through to 44. This developmental period covers looping morphogenesis of the early heart tube in addition to outgrowth and maturation of the ventricle chamber. At stage 34, there was little to distinguish the cohort of mutated heart tubes from controls. The size of the differentiated cardiac muscle tissue shown by actc1 expression, the detection of adprhl1 mRNA, plus the extent of looping all appeared normal (Fig 6A, 6B, 6E and 6F). The following day at stage 39, some differences could be detected. Among the exon 6 mutated tadpoles, the ventricle chamber was frequently smaller than controls, displaced from the ventral midline and oriented incorrectly with regard to the outflow tract position (Fig 6C, 6D, 6G and 6H). In some examples, the adprhl1 mRNA signal in the ventricle also appeared weaker.

A central process during cardiac ventricle growth is the assembly of muscle motor proteins within cardiomyocytes into functional myofibrils that are aligned with distinctive perpendicular or parallel to chamber orientations (see Introduction). Immunological detection of myosin and actin filaments assessed these features of ventricle morphology and linked myofibrillogenesis within tadpoles carrying exon 6 mutations (Fig 7, S15 Fig). Each animal harbored a subtly distinct complement of adprhl1 mutations and this was reflected in the range of aberrant chamber phenotypes observed. The severity of myofibril defects even differed between adjacent cardiomyocytes within a single heart indicating a functional consequence to the cellular mosaicism. Fig 7 presents typical examples of tadpoles of an intermediate phenotype severity, developing with small ventricles that retained some heart beat function. Once the final phenotype classes were assigned at stage 44, S15 Fig shows tadpoles representing extremes from the range of hearts considered abnormal, from the most severely affected inert ventricle to the mildest malformation observed in the beating ventricle group.

By stage 40, cardiac oedema formation indicated which of the mutated tadpoles had impaired circulation (Fig 7A). Upon dissection of these hearts, the ventricles were small compared to controls (Fig 7B). Their cardiomyocytes either had few assembled muscle filaments or contained short, disarrayed myofibrils with poorly defined sarcomeres (Fig 7C and 7D). Non-injected sibling control ventricles contained long, perpendicular myofibrils with discrete sarcomere structure at this stage (Fig 7E–7H).

Within individual stage 42 mutated hearts, the mosaicism amongst the ventricular cardiomyocyte population became more pronounced (Fig 7I–7L). Many cells remained round, lacked myofibrils and instead contained a dense mesh of muscle myosin protein stain (asterisk *, Fig 7L). Other cardiomyocytes that retained some competency to assemble myofibrils extended filaments that enveloped the round cells. However, as a consequence of the disruption, there was no clear order to the direction of filament extension (Fig 7K). Viewed at high magnification, there was considerable disarray, with branched myofibrils and poor alignment of the myosin and actin filaments into ordered sarcomeres (arrowhead, Fig 7L). Within control stage 42 ventricles (Fig 7M–7P), increased packing together of the perpendicular chamber myofibrils had occurred (Fig 7O). The prominent green stripe of actin at the Z-discs provided evidence of the maturing sarcomere structure (arrowhead, Fig 7P).

At stage 44, tadpoles classed as having the strongest heart defect with an inert ventricle had large oedemas but no other discernible malformations (S15A Fig). Ventricle growth had failed to the extent that the heart still resembled a primitive tube that also lacked trabeculae ridges (S15B and S15C Fig). Round cardiomyocytes and the myofibril defects persisted as described before (S15D–S15H Fig). Even mutated tadpoles exhibiting the mildest form of heart defects were noteworthy (S15I–S15P Fig). Their cardiomyocytes did contain extensive myofibril networks but they had an unusual appearance (S15L–S15O Fig). The periodicity of actin filaments was equally spaced rather than having the characteristic striated pattern. Moreover, at the resolution available, the actin signal never showed a concentrated stripe to mark the existence of Z-discs (S15P Fig). By contrast, all control hearts examined had a consistent morphology (S15Q–S15X Fig). In particular, all the cardiomyocytes within the ventricular myocardial wall assembled myofibrils at an equal rate and no round cells, or developmentally delayed cells were detected (S15T–S15X Fig).

The defects to chamber myofibrillogenesis observed after adprhl1 exon 6 mutation were compared to that previously reported for adprhl1 gene knockdown using the Adprhl1-e2i2MO morpholino reagent [10]. There is a remarkable consistency to the results. Small, inert hearts formed after MO injection at the one-cell stage. When assayed at stage 40, ventricle growth was impaired and their cardiomyocytes produced only small numbers of myofibrils, which were characteristically short, malformed (branched) and with no chamber-type alignment pattern (Fig 7Q–7T).

3.11. Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3 and 4 are normal—They still produce 25 and 23 kDa ADPRHL1 proteins

Thus far, Xenopus is the sole vertebrate model species to have revealed an essential role of adprhl1 in heart development, despite the clear evolutionary conservation of gene sequence and cardiac gene expression. In mouse, a definitive Adprhl1 gene knockout has not been reported. An Adprhl1^em1(IMPC)H allele (em1) has been produced as part of the international mouse phenotyping consortium (www.mousephenotype.org) [40]. These homozygote em1 mouse embryos develop normally and the detailed phenotyping pipeline did not reveal any significant adult deleterious traits. The em1 allele is not however a complete deletion of the Adprhl1 gene. Rather em1 harbours a 1087 bp deletion that removes Adprhl1 exons 3 and 4. Both exons encode an intact number of codons (126 and 141 bp) and 89 amino acids are theoretically lost from the full length protein.

To clarify the nature of this allele, we obtained em1 mice and examined ADPRHL1 protein production within their hearts (Fig 8A). The 40 kDa ADPRHL1 did indeed show a dose-dependent loss in heterozygote and homozygote em1 adult hearts but there was no linked appearance of a new species equivalent to an exons 3–4 deleted form. There were nonetheless two other abundant protein species identified by the ADPRHL1 antibody at 25 and 23 kDa. Significantly, these smaller ADPRHL1 proteins were unaffected by the em1 deletion. It should be noted that the two smaller proteins had also been observed previously in E11.5 embryonic mouse hearts [10]. Thus the em1 data proves the full length ADPRHL1 protein is not actually required for heart formation in mammals but also shows that the em1 deletion is probably not a null mutant allele. It highlights the potential importance of the smaller ADPRHL1 protein forms and provides valuable information on their likely composition. The 25 and 23 kDa species do not contain exons 3–4 encoded sequence but will include the exons 5–6 sequence recognised by the antibody (Discussion 4.3, Fig 8B and 8C).

Given the results reported here for Xenopus adprhl1 mutation, we anticipate a true mouse Adprhl1 gene knockout would also show comparable severe defects in embryonic cardiogenesis. By identifying the di-arginine containing peptide loop that is conserved across species whose exon 6 sequence is amenable to targeting by CRISPR/Cas9, our Xenopus experiments can help inform revised attempts to document Adprhl1 gene inactivation in mammalian systems.

4. Discussion

4.1. CRISPR/Cas9 adprhl1 gene knockout in G0-generation embryos

We have used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to induce mutations across the Xenopus adprhl1 gene in order to build on a previous study of morpholino-mediated adprhl1 expression knockdown. Growth of the heart ventricle in embryos and particularly the assembly of cardiac myofibrils was dependent on adprhl1 but how it acted was uncertain and was complicated by the existence of two Adprhl1 proteins. MO reagents that interfered with adprhl1 RNA-splicing depleted both the expected 40 kDa protein and also the smaller 23 kDa species [10]. Using expression of transgenes, we now show the 40 kDa protein only part rescues MO myofibril defects. Meanwhile, other MOs designed to selectively inhibit translation initiation of the 40 kDa Adprhl1 cause earlier developmental malformations that overshadow any heart abnormalities. Their poor specificity presents a barrier to further progress using antisense experiments.

CRISPR/Cas9 is a transformative technology that allows the genomes of cells and experimental model animals to be precisely targeted, altered and scrutinised [34]. It is a powerful tool for developing applications of gene editing [Reviewed 32,33]. In a simple strategy for targeted gene mutation, we introduced DSBs at different exonic locations of the Xenopus laevis adprhl1 gene by injecting guide-RNAs and the Cas9 endonuclease into newly fertilized embryos. Subsequent genome repair by non-homologous end-joining results in a DNA sequence lesion at the site of Cas9 cleavage. Repair occurs simultaneously with ongoing DNA synthesis and cell division, so variant alleles can have a mosaic distribution among cells as the animals grow. Rapid discovery of a uniform adprhl1 knockout phenotype in G0-generation embryos thus requires complete DSB cutting of every gene copy present at the one-cell stage and that all resulting variant alleles lack activity. Our optimized method routinely achieves 100% DSB efficiency but it is inevitable that in-frame nucleotide deletions, insertions or substitutions within the adprhl1 coding sequence will always occur along with mutations that cause catastrophic frame shifts. Therefore, testing many gRNAs distributed across the adprhl1 locus for their ability to impair heart formation is, in effect, a screen for DSB positions where all favoured repairs yield non-functional alleles and where even the most subtly repaired mutation that preserves an intact reading frame still encodes an inactive protein. Such a sensitive gRNA target site would likely identify a sub-domain of Adprhl1 that is essential for its participation in cardiac myofibrillogenesis.

Many studies of heart formation have shown the embryo has significant regulatory potential in order to produce a functional organ in the face of potentially damaging insults [41]. For example, a cardiac progenitor tissue field where only a portion of cells were compromised and unable to contribute to the developing chambers could reconfigure and still produce a normal heart. This consideration is critical for understanding the difference between G0-experiments that target an essential cardiogenic gene versus say monitoring pigment-loss after tyrosinase mutation. Yet despite all these potential limitations, we find that a gRNA that promotes adprhl1 mutation at exon 6 does yield consistent heart myofibril defects.

4.2. Is there a link between Adprhl1, ADP-ribosylation on arginine and actin filament dynamics?

Little was known regarding Adprhl1 action before it was linked to the heart. Sequence similarity defined a small family of vertebrate ADP-ribosylhydrolases (pfam03747), comprising the active enzyme Adprh (sometimes named ARH1, or ADP-ribosyl-acceptor hydrolase), Adprh-like 1 (Adprhl1, or ARH2) and also an enzyme Adprh-like 2 (Adprhl2, or ARH3) [18]. Comparing human homologs, the 357 amino acid ADPRH and 354 aa ADPRHL1 share 46% sequence identity, while ADPRH and ADPRHL2 are 22% identical. Moreover, the evolutionary conservation of Adprhl1 sequence extends to frogs, with Xenopus Adprhl1 being 75% identical to human ADPRHL1 and 47% identical to the Xenopus species Adprh.

The founding member Adprh was first identified during the study of mono-ADP-ribosylation, a post-translational modification of proteins in which arginine side chains are a frequently used attachment site [Reviewed 42]. Adprh is a cytosolic enzyme that can reverse the modification by cleaving the ADP-ribose linkage and restoring unmodified arginine residues [19]. Its discovery supported a proposal that cycles of ADP-ribosylation and removal might occur within (animal) cells to regulate target protein function. Protein structures and the reaction mechanism reveal that active ADP-ribosylhydrolases rely on a pair of divalent cations, magnesium for ADPRH and ADPRHL2, that are coordinated by two pairs of aspartate residues located in N- and C-terminal portions of the enzyme [43,44]. ADPRHL2 contains a distinct flexible substrate binding cleft that enables hydrolysis of ADP-ribosylated serine side chains, as well as poly(ADP-ribose) and O-acetylated-ADP-ribose degradation [21,45]. However, within the familial active site of Adprhl1, it is the amino acids necessary for catalysis that are changed. Three of the four critical aspartates have been lost in mammalian ADPRHL1, along with key tyrosine and serine residues required to stabilize the adenine and ribose substrate groups (Fig 9A–9C, residues of human ADPRH lost are Asp56, Asp302, Asp304, Tyr263, Ser264, Ser269, Ser270, only Asp55 is retained) [10]. The sequence changes suggest binding of ADP-ribosylated protein substrates and cation-mediated catalysis are both abolished in Adprhl1 and biochemical assays have confirmed the lack of any comparable enzymatic activity [20]. The term ‘pseudoenzyme’ has been coined to raise awareness of such members of a protein family that have lost essential catalytic residues [Reviewed 46]. As an example, without a functioning active site, pseudokinases have evolved to redeploy a substrate binding activity for a new purpose, or confer allosteric control upon a relative kinase that retains enzymatic activity. So did cardiac Adprhl1 evolve to bind proteins that can also be targets of the active hydrolase? The result of CRISPR-mediated cleavage by the gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA and the small in-frame deletions that predominate at this site suggests this is likely. Severe ventricle myofibril defects resulting from disturbed Adprhl1 function occur because of the specific omission of between one and four amino acids from a loop of peptide backbone at the centre of the ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase site. The critical Adprhl1 deletion covers the exact structural position where in the active enzyme Adprh, two adjacent serines that support adenosine-ribose substrate binding are located. So while ADP-ribose may not be the correct molecular group, it is the substrate binding cleft of Adprhl1 that fulfils an essential role during heart chamber growth.

Although indirect, two pieces of evidence point towards actin being a shared protein target of both Adprhl1 and Adprh. Previously, an N-terminal epitope tag revealed a direct Adprhl1 association with myofibrils in Xenopus, localizing to barbed end boundaries of actin filaments [10]. We now also know that Xenopus adprh mRNA has expression within epidermal cells that function to protect the embryo from external pathogens (Fig 1A) [47]. This is significant as it potentially changes the context of Adprh enzyme action in aquatic vertebrates. An epidermal cell activity could counter the invasive ADP-ribosyltransferase (ART) components of toxins from pathogenic bacteria [Reviewed 48]. Arginine-specific toxin ARTs have been studied extensively and the host cell cytoskeleton is a major focus. At present, there are nine distinct toxins identified that selectively ADP-ribosylate actin at a single arginine-177 (equates to Arg179 in muscle α-actins) and this modification triggers the collapse of actin filaments within the stricken cell [Reviewed 49]. They attack the monomeric form of actin, which then behaves like a capping protein at the barbed end of filaments [50]. Arginine-177 sits at the interaction site between opposing subunits of the actin filament when modelled as a two-stranded helix [51,52]. The affinity of ADP-ribosylated actin for the barbed end appears ten-fold higher than unmodified actin, but the protruding modification will then prevent further additions to the adjacent strand, while continued dissociation from the pointed end ultimately causes filament depolymerization.

So Adprhl1 likely affects myofibrils through direct binding of actin and if Adprh may liberate actin from toxin mediated ADP-ribosylation, then we could speculate that the filament interaction surface of actin that surrounds Arg177 might be the link that unites the two. Finding unbiased ways to test the binding specificities of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase family in their correct cellular environment will be key to understanding their true evolutionary relationship. The illustration in Fig 9D and 9E summarises outstanding questions regarding Adprhl1 action that need to be addressed.

4.3. Mapping essential regions of the Adprhl1 protein

Separate gRNAs that hybridized to exon 3 and exon 6 sequences of the Xenopus adprhl1 gene produced developmental heart defects in 30% and over 43% of injected embryos respectively. After exon 6 mutation, myofibril phenotypes in the forming ventricle could be compared to the previous RNA-splicing MO results [10]. Disruption of adprhl1 at the one-cell stage did cause mosaic effects likely due to the heterogeneity of gene repairs. Common features included cardiomyocytes that were severely malformed, remaining round shaped and devoid of myofibrils. Other cells that presumably retained residual Adprhl1 function extended low numbers of muscle filaments with defective sarcomere structure. The MO myofibril abnormalities were generally uniform in all cardiomyocytes, reflecting an initially complete Adprhl1 loss that gradually became less effective as the tadpole grew. Both gene knockout and knockdown experiments revealed that absence of Adprhl1 is associated with a fundamental myofibril assembly deficit.

At exon 3, the range of mutations detected was as expected. Without an intact template to direct accurate repair, the majority of DSBs were rejoined with the reading frame shifted so as to interrupt the coding sequence. The presence of in-frame mutations at low frequency in nearly all embryos determined the severity of the cardiac phenotype, with a milder missense p.(Lys145Ile) substitution being found in tadpoles that preserved a normal heart morphology. Cataloguing the mutations at exon 6 nicely illustrated the consequence of short, direct DNA sequence repeats occurring near the gRNA target site. An emergency repair process exists termed microhomology mediated end-joining, where exonuclease digestion of single DNA strands at the DSB liberates the two repetitive sequences to act as a (erronious) strand annealing position for religation of the lesion [35,36]. The repeats adjacent to the -e6-1 gRNA ensured that repairs were biased in favour of three small in-frame deletions of 3, 9 or 12 bp. Thus exon 6 mutation provided opportune new information, since it linked disturbed Adprhl1 function and ventricle myofibrillogenesis defects to precise amino acid deletions from within the ancestral substrate binding region of the active site cleft.

If Adprhl1 has repurposed a binding affinity from ADP-ribosylhydrolases, then it stands that not all of the familial amino acid sequence would necessarily be required in order to fulfil its new role. The smaller protein identified by the Adprhl1 antibody is conserved in vertebrates; 23 kDa in Xenopus while 25 and 23 kDa species exist in mouse hearts. Study of the mouse Adprhl1 em1 allele has now turned our focus towards these smaller proteins. Homozygous em1 adult mice are completely normal despite this deletion having removed Adprhl1 exons 3 and 4, which would ordinarily contribute a whole 89 amino acids to the full length 40 kDa protein. The hearts of em1 mice did lack 40 kDa ADPRHL1 but the 25 and 23 kDa variants were abundant and unaffected by the deletion. It seems murine 40 kDa ADPRHL1 is a relatively minor protein species that is not actually required for heart formation in mammals. The exact composition of the 25 and 23 kDa ADPRHL1 proteins is not yet known. They do not contain exons 3–4 encoded sequence but will include the exons 5–6 sequence recognised by the antibody. Their synthesis could occur through the activity of a novel gene promoter, by alternative RNA-splicing or distinct translation initiation sites. At present, there is no experimental evidence to determine which is responsible. For example, all Adprhl1 mRNAs and ESTs analysed to date contain the exons 3–4 sequence (S16 Fig), whether studying the mouse, human [53] or frog orthologs. From our experience working with Xenopus hearts, RT-PCR analysis did not detect adprhl1 transcript variants with altered exon composition [10]. It also highlighted potent negative regulation acting on synthesis from the 5’-most AUG, which might allude to translation occurring from different start sites. The sequence of the 25/23 kDa proteins will be resolved by further study of Adprhl1 gene regulation and transcript utilization across the different species.

The conclusions drawn from Xenopus and mouse experiments are not identical but there is considerable alignment between the two. The main difference concerns adprhl1 exon 3, whose size and sequence is conserved across species. Nonetheless, exon 3 frameshift mutations in Xenopus were implicated in cardiac defects whereas it is clearly dispensable in the mouse heart. One way to explain the disparity would be if Xenopus hearts require both the 40 and 23 kDa Adprhl1 proteins to assemble myofibrils. A true mouse Adprhl1 gene knockout has yet to be achieved but we anticipate it would show a comparable embryonic cardiac phenotype that depends on the presence or absence of the smaller 25 and 23 kDa ADPRHL1 proteins. Both species point towards the 3'-most exons of the adprhl1 locus as the necessary focus for further study and Xenopus has highlighted the peptide loop encoded within exon 6. Conservation of this loop sequence means it is also amenable to targeting by CRISPR/Cas9 in mouse and in human cells. Species-specific gRNAs can be designed that match the same exonic PAM location and a repeat sequence favouring a 3 bp deletion repair is even present in the mouse. It would be an excellent starting point for attempts at inactivating the Adprhl1 gene in mammals.

A recent human GWAS of the Icelander population has discovered a link between ADPRHL1 and heart ventricle function [23]. They identified 190 sequence variations from a pool of 32.5 million Icelander SNPs and indels that associated with changes in a detailed analysis of electrocardiogram QRS parameters measured in 81 thousand individuals. One encoded a missense (p.Leu294Arg) substitution in ADPRHL1 that additionally associated with genome-wide significance to an automated ECG diagnosis of a left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) conduction defect. LAFB reflects a disturbance to the normal spatial conduction/contraction sequence of the left ventricle. It is striking that this low frequency ADPRHL1 variant is located within exon 6. The leucine altered is absolutely conserved across vertebrate species and structure models place it in an α-helix immediately underlying the essential loop of the active site. Where the loop of the enzyme Adprh contains di-serine residues, Adprhl1 has instead di-arginine. It is too early to comment on the functional significance of the change, except to mention that auto-regulation is a common feature of ADP-ribosylation enzymes, that both serine and arginine can be acceptors of such modification and that di-arginine and prolyl-arginine are prominent among verified acceptor target sequences [42,54].

4.4. CRISPR/Cas9 experiments and Xenopus embryos

Amphibian embryos have consistently provided major insights across all scales of biological research. CRISPR/Cas9 technology now allows genomes to be interrogated with such speed and precision that new experimental strategies are possible that complement the traditional strengths of the Xenopus model. There is tremendous scope for gene editing in the diploid X. tropicalis species to replicate specific gene mutations observed in human disease [Reviewed 32]. Stable frog lines and the large embryo spawn size can even enable screens for interventions that might ameliorate mutant defects. Other studies require an instant readout of results from a cohort of Cas9 and gRNA injected embryos, say to assess the consequence of specific genome changes at multiple locations. For G0-generation experiments, X. tropicalis and X. laevis offer different attributes [Reviewed 33]. X. laevis does have four alleles of a gene to consider but this provides extra protection against potential off-target activity and the slower development gives more time for Cas9 action at the one-cell stage. Its large embryo size is particularly suited to subsequent analysis of gene edited tadpoles using proteomic methods (size of X. laevis = 3x>X. tropicalis = 2x>D. rerio). For our study, the power of CRISPR/Cas9 over previous strategies for targeted mutation lies in the speed that many gRNAs can be designed, synthesized and tested for activity.

How myofibril assembly underpins ventricle construction is a three-dimensional challenge. The Xenopus embryo offers cardiac structural features relevant to complex mammalian heart chambers, a conservation of adprhl1 gene sequence, external development and manipulation by gene editing. Moving forwards, Xenopus can contribute to Adprhl1 biology through systematic addition of in-frame epitope tags to each coding exon. Tagging the endogenously encoded Adprhl1 will map the composition of the different protein forms within the heart and provide the necessary handles to explore its interaction partners. This previously overlooked but potentially pivotal facilitator of cardiac myofibrillogenesis can now be explored in far greater detail.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Xenopus laevis adprhl1 transcripts and expression detected by exon-specific probes.

A: All X. laevis adprhl1 transcript alignments showing exon and intron sizes [26]. A single RefSeq mRNA aligns to the S-locus (NM_001093322.1, plus rna29777 that includes longer untranslated regions) while the L-locus is represented by four predicted transcripts. The L-transcript (XM_018247162.1) that closely matches the S-allele was cloned from cardiac cDNA and its sequence verified. Both have been used as hybridization probes in situ (B, C, M, N). The core coding sequence, comprising exons 1 through to 7, encodes a 40 kDa Adprhl1 protein. The precise composition of the prevalent 23 kDa Adprhl1 species also found in Xenopus hearts is unknown, although some progress mapping smaller proteins in mouse is presented (Results 3.11, Fig 8, Discussion 4.3). Current vertebrate gene alignments of adprhl1 include predicted longer transcripts containing an additional 3’-exon 8, which has been assigned to the X. laevis L-allele (XM_018247161.1, plus rna10651). Red arrows mark the position of two distinct exon 8 hybridization probes. The translated sequence from the L-p1 region is conserved with mammals whereas L-p2 is divergent. B-N: Adjacent pairs of exons (1–7) produce strong signals but exon 8 probes do not. A stage 36 tadpole (left-lateral view, B) and detail images of hearts (C-N) showing adprhl1 mRNA expression detected with region-specific antisense probes. The probe size (lower left, bases) and substrate incubation time (right, 7 or 25 hours) for the colour reaction is listed on each panel. Probes covering most of the coding sequence synthesized from either S- or L-locus cDNAs will detect the combined expression from all alleles (B, C, M, N). Smaller S-allele probes that correspond to pairs of adjacent exons between 1–7 (D-I) each produce strong heart signals equivalent to that observed using the larger 789 base coding fragment (B, C). In contrast to exons 1–7, the two L-p1 and L-p2 probes detect little cardiac expression from the putative exon 8, despite prolonged substrate incubation (J, K, L-sense probe control). O-U: Tested individually, exons 1–7 produce weak signals due to their short length. A probe size greater than 200 bases would be a minimum requirement for successful hybridization in situ. V: The contribution of each coding exon to the 40 kDa Adprhl1 protein. The positions of the peptide antibody epitope (yellow rectangle), conserved di-arginine sequence (red) and the two ancestral cation coordination sites (black) are marked. All in-frame methionines are shown underneath and mostly match the mouse ADPRHL1 protein (Fig 8C).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S2 Fig. Limited recovery of cardiac myofibril assembly in adprhl1 morpholino injected embryos by transgenic synthesis of recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 proteins.

Experiments that combine adprhl1 MO knockdown with two distinct transgenes engineered to achieve adprhl1 over-expression. This is the extended version of Fig 2. It additionally shows the morphology of the experimental heart ventricles and the extent of Adprhl1 protein production within. The extra panels locate the position within each ventricle wall of the high magnification images (that are also presented in Fig 2) that reveal myofibril patterns found in sample cardiomyocytes. 1A-E: A stage 41 tadpole and its dissected heart ventricle that was injected with the RNA-splice interfering MO, Adprhl1-e2i2MO, into dorsal (D-2/4) blastomeres. Additionally, it carried binary transgenes to over-express recombinant Adprhl1 protein, consisting of Tg[myl7:Gal4] driver and the Tg[UAS:human^1-52-Xenopus^53-354 adprhl1] responder. Left lateral view of head and trunk (A), while the dissected heart was placed with the anterior surface uppermost (B). The white square (B) denotes the position of a detail image of the ventricle (C) and the white square (C) in turn marks the position of further magnified images (D, E). Scale bars = 100 μm (B), = 10 μm (C) and = 5 μm (D, E). Fluorescence images (B-D) show anti-Adprhl1 immunocytochemistry (green), anti-myosin (red) and DAPI-stained nuclei (blue, D). The final panel (E) displays a merge of myosin and phalloidin actin stain, with the phalloidin coloured green to evaluate signal overlap. 2A-E: A sibling tadpole that received the same Adprhl1-e2i2MO injection but carried only the UAS-responder transgene and hence did not produce excess recombinant Adprhl1. 3A-E: A double transgenic sibling that synthesized recombinant human-Xenopus hybrid Adprhl1 but was not injected with the MO. 4A-E: From a second experiment, a stage 42 tadpole that was injected with Adprhl1-e2i2MO and carried the Tg[myl7:Gal4] driver but a different Tg[UAS:Xenopus adprhl1(silent 1-282bp)] responder transgene. This incorporates silent nucleotide changes (synonymous substitutions) to the cDNA sequence in order to partially evade endogenous translational regulation. The heart had a strong MO defect on the anterior ventricle surface, but lower MO concentration and incomplete phenotype towards its right side (4B). 5A-E: A double transgenic, silent mutation, sibling tadpole that synthesized recombinant Xenopus Adprhl1 but was not injected with the MO. 6A-E: A non-injected sibling control harbouring only the silent mutation responder transgene that did not produce excess recombinant Adprhl1. Paired white arrowheads indicate Z-disc sarcomere positions, orange arrowheads denote non-striated filaments. V, ventricle; OT, outflow tract.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S3 Fig. Over-expression of recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 does not yield extra 23 kDa Adprhl1.

Western blots of transgenic tadpole hearts that carried stable lines of the Tg[myl7:Gal4] driver and one of a series of Tg[UAS:adprhl1] responders designed to over-express variants of 40 kDa Adprhl1 protein. Stage 43–44 heart extracts were probed with Adprhl1 antibody, with Actin detection used to normalize the samples. Hum corresponds to a Tg[UAS:human ADPRHL1] responder that induces large-scale synthesis of human-species ADPRHL1 protein in tadpole hearts. This transgene cDNA sequence is sufficiently different from Xenopus to evade the endogenous translational control mechanism that normally limits the production of Adprhl1. Hyb corresponds to the Tg[UAS:hum^1-52-Xen^53-354 adprhl1] responder that over-synthesizes a human-Xenopus hybrid form of Adprhl1 that also escapes translational control. Xen denotes a Tg[UAS:Xenopus adprhl1] transgene. Using unmodified Xenopus adprhl1 cDNA, transgene mRNA transcription is activated but no additional recombinant protein accumulates [10]. WT equates to control (wild type) hearts. On a separate gel with a higher signal exposure, Xen(silent) denotes the Tg[UAS:Xenopus adprhl1(silent 1-282bp)] transgene containing silent nucleotide changes to the 5’-Xenopus cDNA. This transgene partially evaded endogenous control and recombinant Adprhl1 accumulated in a fraction of the cardiomyocytes up to stage 42. However, there is a technical barrier to performing western blot analysis of transgenic hearts at these early stages. The time required to identify double-positive embryos by the transgenes’ marker eye fluorescence and subsequent sample preparation in the numbers necessary to obtain a signal is prohibitive. The silent mutation transgene gave a transient protein induction [10] and no additional Adprhl1 was detected in this sample prepared from stage 44 hearts. In hearts that synthesized excess 40 kDa hybrid Adprhl1, there was no commensurate increase in the abundance of the 23 kDa protein detected by the Adprhl1 antibody. It suggests the 23 kDa Adprhl1 species is not a processed fragment of the full length protein. Of course, this conclusion depends on the hybrid and natural Xenopus forms of Adprhl1 behaving equivalently. There are just 21 amino acid differences between the two variants.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S4 Fig. Excess Adprhl1 production does not trigger cell proliferation, nor cause cell death.

Tadpole heart ventricles with transgenic over-expression of 40 kDa Adprhl1 protein combined with markers of cell division (A-D) and cell death (E-R). The cardiac Tg[myl7:Gal4] driver and Tg[UAS:Xenopus adprhl1(silent 1-282bp)] responder transgenes were utilized. A-D: Two hearts showing anti-Adprhl1 (green), mitosis marker anti-phospho-Histone H3 (red) and phalloidin actin stain (magenta). White squares (A, C) denote the position of detail images (B, D). Cells undergoing mitosis were readily detected within all regions of embryonic stage 40–41 hearts. There was no correlation between excess Adprhl1 production and cell division. Mitotic cells usually had no Adprhl1 signal (B) but occasionally did contain Adprhl1 protein (D). Note, a second P-H3-positive cell (A) near to the featured cell lay deeper within the myocardial wall so was not detected by the thin optical section of the high magnification image (B). Scale bars = 100 μm (A, C), = 10 μm (B, D). E-I: Heart showing anti-Adprhl1 (green, E, F, H), ApopTag^® TUNEL reaction stain (red, G, I), phalloidin (magenta, E, F, H) and DAPI (blue, F, H, I). The white square on the heart (Inset, E) locates images within the ventricle (F, G). Similarly, the squares (F, G) mark the position of detail images (H, I). The ApopTag^® stain detects fragmented DNA of dying cells, caused by either apoptosis or necrotic destruction. The images focus on a cardiomyocyte on the ventricle anterior surface with excessive accumulation of Adprhl1 and a round appearance. Nevertheless, no ApopTag^® signal was observed for this cell (G, I) nor indeed any Adprhl1-positive cells screened across 11 transgenic hearts. Scale bars = 100 μm (E, N), = 10 μm (F, G, J, K, O, P), = 5 μm (H, I, L, M, Q, R). J-M: Programmed cell death within the heart is a rare event during ventricle chamber outgrowth stages. Comparable images of a ventricle from a sibling transgenic tadpole (L has DAPI only). To prove the TUNEL reaction worked in situ, towards the apex, a solitary apoptotic cell was detected in an area without excessive Adprhl1 production (K, M). A typical condensed nucleus was observed with a fragmented DAPI stain (L) and intact ApopTag^® signal (K, M). N-R: A further positive control for the ApopTag^® detection method utilized a different responder transgene to induce necrotic cell death of the cardiomyocytes. The Tg[UAS:M2(H37A)] comprises part of a system for controllable genetic cell-ablation, producing the toxic viral ion channel M2(H37A) [55]. The resulting small malformed heart was mounted with left side uppermost, with outflow tract to the left and ventricle to the right (inset, N). The images focus on the dying ventricle (O, P), in which numerous clusters of dots were present, positive for both ApopTag^® fragmented DNA and DAPI (P-R). The scattered signals indicated cardiomyocytes had ruptured and that their cellular contents and degrading DNA had dispersed within the myocardium. V, ventricle; OT, outflow tract; A, apoptotic cell remnant; N, necrotic cell death fragments.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S5 Fig. Adprhl1 morpholinos—Position, sequence and activity in embryos.

A: Diagram showing the hybridization position of MOs mapped to the first three exons of the S- and L-homeologous loci for X. laevis adprhl1. Morpholinos targeting potential translation initiation sites in adprhl1 mRNA are shown by red arrows, with the corresponding methionine from the Adprhl1 protein sequence printed above. In addition to the 5'-most ATG predicted as the start for 40 kDa translation, there are five internal ATG sequences within the same reading frame. Morpholinos that target RNA-splicing [10] are coloured violet. B: Table containing the MO sequences and their complementarity to the S- and L-homeologs of adprhl1. Asterisks (*) denote sequence variability within X. laevis (see Supplementary Methods 5.11 in S1 Data). Deliberately mismatched bases within control MOs are coloured blue. C: List showing the potential for hybridization to other members of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase gene family. Only MOs-S6 and L6 that target methionine-162 are noteworthy as they could cross-react with the four adprh loci that are present in Xenopus (adprh.S, adprh.L, LOC495095, adprh-like.2.1.S). D: The translation inhibition MOs produce varied effects on embryo development. Parts-of-whole charts showing the frequency of tadpole phenotypes assessed at stage 44 after 32 and 16 ng MO injection at the one-cell stage (percentage values listed for 32 ng injection). The number of independent experiments and total number of embryos assessed is given under each chart. Heart defects were observed for the MOs that interfere with adprhl1 RNA-splicing and for translation inhibiting MOs-L2 and S6. However, all three MOs designed to the most 5’-ATG (Met1), S1a, S1b and L1, caused unforeseen severe tail defects (after delayed blastopore closure at gastrulation). Morpholinos-3, 4 and 5 had no effect on embryo development. For MO-4 and 5, experiments are presented where a mixture of MOs targeting both S- and L-alleles was injected. Images showing representative embryos for active MOs are shown in S6 Fig. For the translation inhibiting MOs-L2 and S6 that did yield heart defects, both exhibited flaws that limit the MOs usefulness. Adprhl1-ATGMO2(L2) produced inert hearts with small ventricles and was designed to an internal ATG within exon 1 whose translation product would begin at Met26 (S6H–S6K Fig). However, this methionine is only found in the L-homeolog, with the MO being a poor match to the corresponding S-allele sequence. Thus S-allele function should be unaffected. Adprhl1-ATGMO6(S6) targeted an exon 3 sequence and potential translation from Met162 that was briefly considered as the start for the 23 kDa Adprhl1 protein. MO-S6 injection caused tadpole hearts that could contract but had failure of ventricle outgrowth (S6L and S6M Fig). Unfortunately, only the MO designed to the S-homeolog produced a heart phenotype whereas a preparation of -ATGMO6(L6) corresponding to the closely related L-allele sequence yielded distinct early developmental defects that precluded analysis of the heart (D).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S6 Fig. Adprhl1 morpholinos—Contrast between RNA-splicing versus translation inhibition.

A: The diagram showing hybridization positions of MOs mapped to the first three exons of the S- and L-homeologous loci for X. laevis adprhl1. B, C: Reproduced for comparison, panels from Fig 1 featuring Adprhl1-e2i2MO RNA-splice interfering MO. Expression of actc1 (heart and skeletal muscle, B) and adprhl1 (C) mRNAs in stage 40 tadpoles after injection of 32 ng -e2i2MO. Impaired heart chamber growth and a loss of adprhl1 mRNA signal is observed. Left-lateral view of tadpole and detail ventral view of heart region presented. D, E: Normal ventricle size and adprhl1 signal in non-injected sibling tadpoles. F-O: Morpholinos designed to inhibit Adprhl1 protein translation produce varied effects on embryo development. Targeting distinct (but same reading frame) ATG-translation initiation sequences can yield malformations, but each exhibits a flaw that limits the MOs usefulness (see S5 Fig legend for details). F, G: Three overlapping MOs designed to the 5’-most AUG of adprhl1 mRNA each cause a tail growth defect, overshadowing any phenotype they might cause in the heart. Stage 39 tadpoles resulting from Adprhl1-ATGMO1(S1b) injection are shown. H-K: Adprhl1-ATGMO2(L2) injection results in inert hearts with small ventricles. Two severities of phenotype at stage 39 are shown, mildly affected tadpoles with small ventricles (H, J) and also details from tadpoles with a complete loss of ventricle growth (I, K). L, M: Adprhl1-ATGMO6(S6) gives some hearts that contract but have loss of chamber growth. N, O: Normal ventricle size and adprhl1 signal in non-injected stage 39 sibling tadpoles. Red arrows denote aberrant morphology. H, heart; T, tail.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S7 Fig. Activity of distinct Cas9 RNAs and protein for tyrosinase gene knockout in X. laevis embryos.

A: Comparing the coding sequence of four distinct Cas9 RNAs and the primary sequence of a commercial Cas9 protein preparation. The deduced Cas9 amino acid sequence originating from Streptococcus pyogenes is identical for all examples. Nevertheless, three shades of blue were used to depict Cas9 because the nucleotide sequences utilized differ due to distinct codon usage. Coding sequences were further modified by inclusion of epitope and purification tags (3xFLAG-green, V5-yellow, 6xHis-grey), nuclear localization signals (SV40-red, nucleoplasmin-magenta), self-cleaving 2A peptide (brown) and orange fluorescent protein reporter (orange). As an example of their size, the hSpCas9 protein is 1423 amino acids long, composed of N-terminal methionine, 22 aa 3xFLAG, 17 aa SV40-NLS, 1367 aa Cas9 (without N-term Met) and 16 aa nucleoplasmin-NLS sequences. B: Table showing the frequency of albino tadpoles obtained after disruption of the tyrosinase gene by injection of each Cas9 reagent together with tyr gRNAs into one-cell stage embryos (Materials and Methods 2.3). Parts-of-whole charts assigned the resulting stage 42 tadpoles to five albino phenotype classes that described the extent of pigmentation-loss and thus completeness of the gene knockout. C: Tadpoles representing the range of pigmentation-loss phenotypes observed after tyrosinase knockout. Left-lateral views, anterior half of tadpoles presented. Definitions of the five albino phenotype classes were comparable to those used by Guo et al [30]. D: Charts from a single experiment using Cas9 protein showing how the efficiency of tyrosinase knockout reduced as the time point of injection (minutes post-fertilization) increased. Beyond 90 minutes, embryos had reached the two-cell stage and thus injection of the same total mass of reagents was divided between both blastomeres. Based on this timed series, an upper limit of 60 minutes post-fertilization was set for all Cas9 injections at the one-cell stage.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S8 Fig. Adprhl1 gRNAs—Full list of gRNA experiments and embryo phenotype frequencies.

Parts-of-whole charts showing the frequency of stage 44 tadpole phenotypes that occurred after injection of adprhl1 gRNAs along with Cas9 protein into one-cell stage embryos. The number of independent experiments and total number of embryos assessed is given under each chart. Red rectangles surround graphs for gRNAs whose activities were also examined by DNA sequencing. Green rectangles denote control gRNAs and also a graph presenting the cumulative total for non-injected sibling tadpoles assayed in the experiments. The highest frequencies of heart defects were detected using the gAdprhl1-e3-1 and in particular the -e6-1 gRNA. The lower seven panels show the consequence of combining gRNAs that hybridize to two genomic regions of adprhl1 into a single injection. None of these combinatorial gRNA experiments increased heart defect frequencies beyond that obtained by gAdprhl1-e6-1 alone. Nonetheless, sequencing data was analysed for experiments where exons 3 and 4 were targeted at neighbouring positions to determine if resulting lesions contained deletions between the DSB sites (see S12 Fig).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S9 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 3 gives 100% mutation efficiency—S-homeolog DNA sequences.

Sanger DNA sequences of adprhl1 S-homeologous locus exon 3 after mutation by the gAdprhl1-e3-1(S+L) gRNA plus Cas9. Mutated sequences from the L-locus gave the same profile. The hybridization position of the gRNA is depicted by the red arrow placed above the expected sequence (top 2 rows, exon and genomic). Alignment of 215 cloned (S-) isolates of amplified DNA obtained from 23 tadpoles, with every sequence carrying a lesion at the gRNA binding site. Mutant nucleotide sequences are coloured red. Missense mutations are listed first, followed by deletions (red hyphens, ordered by ascending size) and then sequences containing insertions (red arrowheads). Columns to the right give the number of instances of each sequence, alongside a genotype score that records the consequence of the given mutation to the Adprhl1 primary amino acid sequence. The key to interpret the genotype score is also included.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(508.9KB, pdf)}

S10 Fig. Exon 3 classification of mutated adprhl1 sequences—Missense mutations are likely to retain function.

A: All DNA sequences grouped by gRNAs injection. Each DNA sequence of adprhl1 exon 3 obtained after gRNA plus Cas9-mediated mutation was assigned a genotype score (a number code), based on the size of amino acid sequence modification it encoded. Parts-of-whole charts record the frequency of these genotype scores tallied for all embryos that received the -e3-1(S+L) gRNA (left chart), an embryo injected with a combination of neighbouring -e3-1(S+L) and -i2-2L gRNAs (centre chart), and a non-injected control embryo (right chart). The total number of S- and L-locus sequences analysed is listed below each chart. The key to interpret the genotype score is also included (far right). The inclusion of the -i2-2L gRNA induced larger deletions at the L-locus that would lead to exon 3 skipping, as shown by the increased proportion of score 02 sequences. B: Sequences and mutation details of individual embryos. Separate charts for 11 of the embryos, including 5 tadpoles that developed heart defects, 5 that developed normally and the one non-injected sibling. Columns list the number of sequences and the number of distinct sequences (in square brackets) for each embryo, plus the presence of larger deletions (and their size) that skip exon 3 and score 02. More importantly, for those embryos harbouring subtle mutations that scored 04 or 05, the precise amino acid change is also given. A standard nomenclature for protein sequence variations is used to describe the changes, with a simplified summary (highlighted) underneath stating whether the mutation caused a missense, deletion or aa insertion modification. Highlight colour matches the genotype score of the sequence. The rectangle border colour denotes a missense (teal), net deletion (blue) or net insertion (violet). At this position within exon 3, wherever missense mutations were found (eg p.(Lys145Ile)), the tadpole had preserved a normal heart morphology. C: Structure model of X. laevis Adprhl1 protein backbone, oriented with the ancestral active site cleft to the left and facing away (Arg271-Arg272 coloured red) [10]. Exon 3 encodes a whole number of codons, contributing 41 amino acids arranged as two antiparallel α-helices. The extended loop mutated by the -e3-1(S+L) gRNA connects the two helices together and resides on the opposite face to the active site (coloured yellow and magenta). Within exon 3, the consequence of in-frame, small amino acid deletions or insertions could not be defined with certainty. Nonetheless, triplet amino acid deletions were found in the normal cohort and may have protected the heart in two tadpoles (see tadpole#20170329014), which suggested these alleles were functional. Conversely, small insertions were biased towards animals with defective hearts, including examples where just a single amino acid was inserted between residues Lys145 and Pro146. Just one mutation gave apparently conflicting results. A 21 bp deletion resulting in a loss of 7 amino acids (p.(Met141_Gly147del)) was present in the heart defect group but also as the sole score 04–05 mutation detected in a normal tadpole (see tadpoles#20170406007, #20170406003). The model of Adprhl1 structure provided some context for the observed sequence modifications. It is plausible that a three amino acid deletion could be accommodated without loss of structural integrity (C).

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(482.5KB, pdf)}

S11 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 4 with gAdprhl1-e4-1 gives 82% mutation efficiency—S- and L-homeolog DNA sequences.

DNA sequences of adprhl1 exon 4 after mutation by the gAdprhl1-e4-1 gRNA plus Cas9, with both S-homeologous locus (upper panel) and L-locus (lower panel) presented. The hybridization position of -e4-1 gRNA is shown by the red arrow and neighbouring gRNAs by grey arrows, placed above the expected sequence (top 2 rows, exon and genomic). Alignment of 93 DNA clones (S-63, L-30) of amplified DNA obtained from 5 tadpoles. 76 sequences were mutated but 17 remained unaltered, demonstrating this gRNA was less effective than those that targeted exons 3 and 6. As before, mutant nucleotide sequences are coloured red. Wild-type (WT) sequences are listed first, followed by missense mutations, deletions (red hyphens) and insertions (red arrowheads). The number of instances of each sequence is to the right, alongside its genotype score.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(511.8KB, pdf)}

S12 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 4 with adjacent gRNA pairs gives 88% mutation efficiency—S-homeolog DNA sequences.

DNA sequences of adprhl1 S-locus exon 4 after mutation by two adjacent gRNAs, gAdprhl1-e4-1 and -e4-2(S+L), plus Cas9. Sequences obtained from the L-locus gave the same profile. Comparing data for both S- and L-loci from 4 tadpoles, of 95 DNA clones (S-68, L-27), 89 sequences were mutated but 6 S-sequences remained unaltered. Thus for exon 4 at least, combining pairs of gRNAs did not eradicate the low persistence of wild-type sequences. Some mutant sequences carried two separate lesions while others contained a single larger deletion between the two gRNA binding sites. As before, mutant nucleotide sequences are coloured red. Wild-type (WT) sequences are listed first, followed by missense mutations, deletions (red hyphens) and insertions (red arrowheads). The number of instances of each sequence is to the right, alongside its genotype score.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(509.3KB, pdf)}

S13 Fig. Exon 4 classification of mutated adprhl1 sequences—Incomplete mutation rarely causes heart defects.

A: All DNA sequences grouped by gRNA injection. Parts-of-whole charts record the frequency of sequence genotype scores tallied for all embryos that received Cas9 and gRNAs targeting adprhl1 exon 4. The gAdprhl1-e4-1 gRNA was injected individually (far-left chart) and in combination with the neighbouring -e4-2(S+L) (centre-left chart) or -e4-3(S+L) gRNAs (centre-right chart), while sequences from non-injected control embryos were also compared (far-right chart). The total number of S- and L-locus sequences analysed is listed below each chart. The key to interpret the genotype score is also included. Mutation at exon 4 was extensive but incomplete and some wild-type sequences persisted for all combinations of gRNAs tested. B: Sequences and mutation details of individual embryos. Separate charts for 8 typical embryos with normal heart formation, including two representing each gRNA mixture plus sibling controls. Columns list the number of sequences and the number of distinct sequences (in square brackets) for each embryo, plus the presence of larger deletions (and their size) that skip exon 4 and genotype score 02. For smaller in-frame lesions, the precise amino acid change is also given. For these attempts to disrupt exon 4, most tadpoles retained a small proportion of wild-type sequence alleles. Of two presented here with 100% mutation, the reason their hearts were unaffected could not be determined conclusively. Nonetheless, one featured a subtle missense substitution while the second contained a deletion of 3 amino acids that would shorten an α-helix. They were also both notable for harbouring alleles likely to skip exon 4 from the mature mRNA. C: Structure model of X. laevis Adprhl1 protein backbone, oriented with the ancestral active site cleft to the left and facing away (Arg271-Arg272 coloured red). Exon 4 encodes a whole number of codons, contributing 47 amino acids. The start and end points of exon 4-derived amino acid sequence lie in close proximity within the model. Mutations induced by the three exon 4 gRNA positions are dispersed (Gly172 green, Gln191 blue, His 213 magenta), but non reside on the same face as the active site.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S14 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 6 causes near complete mutation and in-frame repair bias—L-homeolog DNA sequences.

Cloned DNA sequences of adprhl1 L-locus exon 6 after mutation by the gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA plus Cas9. Mutated sequences from the S-locus exon 6 are presented in Fig 4. Alignment of 249 (L-) DNA clones obtained from 16 tadpoles, with 248 carrying a lesion and just one instance of a wild-type (WT) sequence persisting. Mutant nucleotide sequences are coloured red. Deletion mutations are listed first (red hyphens) and then insertions (red arrowheads). Frequently occurring sequences containing in-frame 3, 9 or 12 bp deletions are highlighted. The number of instances of each sequence is to the right, alongside its genotype score. Note, a handful of exon 6 clones had a mixed origin, containing S-sequence at one end and L-sequence at the other end of the PCR fragment. They must have been produced by two distinct PCR annealing and partial extension reactions occurring for a single DNA strand, exacerbated by the short extension times recommended by modern proof-reading DNA polymerases. They were assigned to S- or L- datasets according to the homeolog identity at the 5’- of the PCR. The first and nineteenth rows of this figure feature two such clones, classed as L-sequences but with 6 mismatches that have an S-origin.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S15 Fig. Range of ventricle phenotype severities observed after mutation of adprhl1 exon 6.

After adprhl1 mutation, tadpole heart phenotype was assessed at stage 44 and animals with aberrant morphologies were divided into two severity classes based on whether the ventricle was able to contract or not. The two examples here represent extremes from the range of hearts considered abnormal, from the most severely affected inert ventricle (A-H) to the mildest malformation observed in the beating ventricle class (I-P). It should be noted that most of the abnormal hearts were of an intermediate severity, were assigned to the beating group and resembled the earlier stage 40–42 examples shown in the principal figure (Fig 7), particularly with regard to the mosaicism found amongst the ventricular cardiomyocytes. A: Strong phenotype. Cardiac oedema of a stage 44 tadpole after injection of the gAdprhl1-e6-1 gRNA plus Cas9. Right-lateral view of tadpole and left detail of small inert heart presented. Aside from the heart, there are no other discernible defects. Axial structures are straight and gut looping has commenced. B, C: Fluorescence images of the dissected heart placed with anterior-left surface uppermost showing phalloidin actin filament stain (green) scanned at the level of the ventricle myocardial wall (B) and a slice through the lumen (C) located 10 μm deeper. Ventricle growth has completely failed and no trabeculae ridges have formed at the inner surface of the chamber. D-G: Abnormal cardiomyocytes (D) with merged signals for phalloidin actin (green), anti-myosin (red) and DAPI nuclei (blue) from the region of ventricle wall framed by the white square (B). The white square (D) in turn marks the further magnified images (E-G) that show separate myosin and actin signals in addition to the channel merge. H: Muscle filaments inside a single cardiomyocyte identified by the open arrowhead (E-H). The cardiomyocytes vary with regard to the composition of their myofibril structure. Many retain a round shape and contain clusters of short, thin muscle filaments. These have primitive striated patterns to the myosin filaments but the actin strands are poorly defined with little periodicity (open arrowhead, E-H). Where cardiomyocytes have assembled longer myofibrils, the sarcomere spacing appears abnormal (filled arrowhead, E-G, also see below). Scale bars = 100 μm (B), = 10 μm (D) and = 5 μm (E). I: Mildest malformed phenotype after adprhl1 mutation. Left-lateral view of stage 44 tadpole and ventral view of its small heart. J, K: The dissected heart ventricle with anterior surface uppermost scanned at the level of the myocardial wall (J) and a slice through the lumen (K) 8 μm deeper. The ventricle is small with a thin myocardial wall, but trabeculae ridges have formed correctly inside. L-P: Cardiomyocytes of the ventricle (L-O) and a myofibril detail within a single cell (P). A few round cells are present with prominent red myosin stain (open arrowhead, L) but most have produced myofibrils (filled arrowhead, M-P). At high magnification, the periodicity of the actin filaments in particular appears equally spaced rather than the characteristic striated pattern, with no brighter actin stripe indicative of a Z-disc (P). Q-X: Comparable images from a sibling non-injected control stage 44 tadpole. There is no oedema (Q), while the ventricle has the normal packing of elongated cardiomyocytes in the chamber wall (R, T) and parallel (base to apex) alignment of deep lying trabeculae (S). Within the myocardial wall, myofibrils extend predominantly in a perpendicular (to chamber) direction and their sarcomere repeats are mature with a clear Z-disc actin stripe (filled arrowhead, U-X). Oed, oedema; V, ventricle; OT, outflow tract; A, atria.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S16 Fig. Mammalian Adprhl1 transcript alignments.

A: Five mouse Adprhl1 transcripts aligned to the gene showing exon and intron sizes. No mRNAs have yet been identified or predicted with exons 3 and 4 skipped in mouse, man or frog. The Transcript Support Level (TSL) values indicate low confidence for the four predicted mouse transcripts; one incorporates the additional 3’-exon 8, two have incomplete open reading frames and one is classed as a small non-coding retained intron. B: There are two RefSeq mRNAs arising from different promoters among the four human ADPRHL1 transcripts. C: For comparison, the X. laevis adprhl1 S-locus transcript alignment.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S1 Raw image. Fig 8 original images.

Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3 and 4 are normal—They still produce 25 and 23 kDa ADPRHL1 proteins. A: ADPRHL1 protein from em1 allele mouse heart tissue. Left three lanes used for figure. Right three lanes contain twice the volume of extract loaded. Film exposure 10 seconds. B: Lower 5 seconds film exposure of the same experiment after a time delay to allow the ECL-Prime signal to begin to decay. C: Actin detection used to normalise loading of the samples. Left three lanes used for figure, higher loading of right three lanes has affected their resolution on the gel. Signal specificity not optimal due to excessive primary antibody concentration but the result serves to standardise the samples. Film exposure 4 seconds. D: Slightly improved specificity of the 42 kDa actin doublet following a longer time delay to allow the intense ECL-Prime signal to begin to decay. Film exposure 5 seconds.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(9MB, pdf)}

S2 Raw image. S3 Fig original images.

Over-expression of recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 does not yield extra 23 kDa Adprhl1. The Adprhl1 (peptide) antibody gives a characteristic western blot signal pattern with Xenopus heart tissue. When used to probe freshly electrophoresed samples, the relative intensities of 40 and 23 kDa bands are usually comparable. Occasionally, an additional smaller 17 kDa product is also observed (A). If the membrane is then stripped for reuse with acidified glycine treatment, then any subsequent pattern obtained with the Adprhl1 antibody is subtly changed. The intensity of the 23 kDa signal is always increased relative to the 40 kDa band. No additional protein species are ever observed when used as a subsequent probe. Whether the 23 kDa Adprhl1 epitope is subject to (an obscuring) post-translational modification that can be removed by acid treatment remains to be explored. This feature of the Adprhl1 antibody is demonstrated here in panels A and B. Acid glycine treatment: freshly prepared 200 mM glycine, 1% SDS, pH 2.5; membrane washed twice for 10 minutes. A: Adprhl1 protein signal from different transgenic lines that was used in S3 Fig. Antibody probe of fresh samples. Film exposure 1 minute. B: Adprhl1 signal of the same samples obtained after the membrane was stripped and reprobed. This image was not used in S3 but provides useful insight into antibody activity. Film exposure 1 minute. C: Actin detection used to normalise loading of the samples. Film exposure 30 seconds. D: Adprhl1 signal from additional (fresh) samples, including from the transgenic line containing silent nucleotide changes. Film exposure 45 minutes. E: Actin signal to normalise loading of these additional samples. Film exposure 5 seconds.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(9MB, pdf)}

S1 Data

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(33.9KB, docx)}

Acknowledgments

We thank the Aquatics STP of The Francis Crick Institute for supply of Xenopus embryos. We thank Laurent Dupays for help with administration of the mouse line.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

All authors and this work were supported by The Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK, the UK Medical Research Council (TJM grant U117562103) and the Wellcome Trust. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1.Boogerd CJJ, Moorman AFM, Barnett P. Protein interactions at the heart of cardiac chamber formation. Ann Anat. 2009;191: 505–517. 10.1016/j.aanat.2009.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Desgrange A, Le Garrec J-F, Meilhac SM. Left-right asymmetry in heart development and disease: forming the right loop. Development. 2018;145 10.1242/dev.162776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Lin Y-F, Swinburne I, Yelon D. Multiple influences of blood flow on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in the embryonic zebrafish heart. Dev Biol. 2012;362: 242–253. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Kelly RG, Buckingham ME, Moorman AF. Heart fields and cardiac morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4 10.1101/cshperspect.a015750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Uribe V, Ramadass R, Dogra D, Rasouli SJ, Gunawan F, Nakajima H, et al. In vivo analysis of cardiomyocyte proliferation during trabeculation. Development. 2018;145 10.1242/dev.164194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Günthel M, Barnett P, Christoffels VM. Development, Proliferation, and Growth of the Mammalian Heart. Mol Ther. 2018;26: 1599–1609. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Bornhorst D, Xia P, Nakajima H, Dingare C, Herzog W, Lecaudey V, et al. Biomechanical signaling within the developing zebrafish heart attunes endocardial growth to myocardial chamber dimensions. Nat Commun. 2019;10: 4113 10.1038/s41467-019-12068-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Fukuda R, Gunawan F, Ramadass R, Beisaw A, Konzer A, Mullapudi ST, et al. Mechanical Forces Regulate Cardiomyocyte Myofilament Maturation via the VCL-SSH1-CFL Axis. Dev Cell. 2019;51: 62–77.e5. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Sidhwani P, Yelon D. Fluid forces shape the embryonic heart: Insights from zebrafish. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;132: 395–416. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Smith SJ, Towers N, Saldanha JW, Shang CA, Mahmood SR, Taylor WR, et al. The cardiac-restricted protein ADP-ribosylhydrolase-like 1 is essential for heart chamber outgrowth and acts on muscle actin filament assembly. Dev Biol. 2016;416: 373–388. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Ramsdell AF, Bernanke JM, Trusk TC. Left-right lineage analysis of the embryonic Xenopus heart reveals a novel framework linking congenital cardiac defects and laterality disease. Development. 2006;133: 1399–1410. 10.1242/dev.02292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Fenix AM, Neininger AC, Taneja N, Hyde K, Visetsouk MR, Garde RJ, et al. Muscle-specific stress fibers give rise to sarcomeres in cardiomyocytes. Elife. 2018;7 10.7554/eLife.42144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Sparrow JC, Schöck F. The initial steps of myofibril assembly: integrins pave the way. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10: 293–298. 10.1038/nrm2634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Du A, Sanger JM, Sanger JW. Cardiac myofibrillogenesis inside intact embryonic hearts. Dev Biol. 2008;318: 236–246. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Rui Y, Bai J, Perrimon N. Sarcomere formation occurs by the assembly of multiple latent protein complexes. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1001208 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Carlisle C, Prill K, Pilgrim D. Chaperones and the Proteasome System: Regulating the Construction and Demolition of Striated Muscle. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;19 10.3390/ijms19010032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Gautel M, Djinović-Carugo K. The sarcomeric cytoskeleton: from molecules to motion. J Exp Biol. 2016;219: 135–145. 10.1242/jeb.124941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Mashimo M, Kato J, Moss J. Structure and function of the ARH family of ADP-ribosyl-acceptor hydrolases. DNA Repair (Amst). 2014;23: 88–94. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Moss J, Stanley SJ, Nightingale MS, Murtagh JJ, Monaco L, Mishima K, et al. Molecular and immunological characterization of ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolases. J Biol Chem. 1992;267: 10481–10488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Oka S, Kato J, Moss J. Identification and characterization of a mammalian 39-kDa poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281: 705–713. 10.1074/jbc.M510290200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Rack JGM, Ariza A, Drown BS, Henfrey C, Bartlett E, Shirai T, et al. (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolases: Structural Basis for Differential Substrate Recognition and Inhibition. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25: 1533–1546.e12. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Beqqali A, Kloots J, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Mummery C, Passier R. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells. 2006;24: 1956–1967. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Norland K, Sveinbjornsson G, Thorolfsdottir RB, Davidsson OB, Tragante V, Rajamani S, et al. Sequence variants with large effects on cardiac electrophysiology and disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10: 4803 10.1038/s41467-019-12682-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Wang F, Shi Z, Cui Y, Guo X, Shi Y-B, Chen Y. Targeted gene disruption in Xenopus laevis using CRISPR/Cas9. Cell Biosci. 2015;5: 15 10.1186/s13578-015-0006-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Wilson LOW, O’Brien AR, Bauer DC. The Current State and Future of CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA Design Tools. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9: 749 10.3389/fphar.2018.00749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Karimi K, Fortriede JD, Lotay VS, Burns KA, Wang DZ, Fisher ME, et al. Xenbase: a genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic model organism database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: D861–D868. 10.1093/nar/gkx936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Session AM, Uno Y, Kwon T, Chapman JA, Toyoda A, Takahashi S, et al. Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis. Nature. 2016;538: 336–343. 10.1038/nature19840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Bae S, Park J, Kim J-S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 1473–1475. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Burger A, Lindsay H, Felker A, Hess C, Anders C, Chiavacci E, et al. Maximizing mutagenesis with solubilized CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Development. 2016;143: 2025–2037. 10.1242/dev.134809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Guo X, Zhang T, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Shi Z, Wang Q, et al. Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Development. 2014;141: 707–714. 10.1242/dev.099853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: W537–W544. 10.1093/nar/gky379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Naert T, Vleminckx K. CRISPR/Cas9 disease models in zebrafish and Xenopus: The genetic renaissance of fish and frogs. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2018;28: 41–52. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2018.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Tandon P, Conlon F, Furlow JD, Horb ME. Expanding the genetic toolkit in Xenopus: Approaches and opportunities for human disease modeling. Dev Biol. 2017;426: 325–335. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337: 816–821. 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Ceccaldi R, Liu JC, Amunugama R, Hajdu I, Primack B, Petalcorin MIR, et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Polθ-mediated repair. Nature. 2015;518: 258–262. 10.1038/nature14184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Seol J-H, Shim EY, Lee SE. Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly. Mutat Res. 2018;809: 81–87. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Sive HL, Grainger RM, Harland RM. Early development of Xenopus laevis: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
38.Jiang F, Zhou K, Ma L, Gressel S, Doudna JA. STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY. A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition. Science. 2015;348: 1477–1481. 10.1126/science.aab1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Wu X, Scott DA, Kriz AJ, Chiu AC, Hsu PD, Dadon DB, et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32: 670–676. 10.1038/nbt.2889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Dickinson ME, Flenniken AM, Ji X, Teboul L, Wong MD, White JK, et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature. 2016;537: 508–514. 10.1038/nature19356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Drenckhahn J-D, Schwarz QP, Gray S, Laskowski A, Kiriazis H, Ming Z, et al. Compensatory growth of healthy cardiac cells in the presence of diseased cells restores tissue homeostasis during heart development. Dev Cell. 2008;15: 521–533. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Laing S, Unger M, Koch-Nolte F, Haag F. ADP-ribosylation of arginine. Amino Acids. 2011;41: 257–269. 10.1007/s00726-010-0676-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Kernstock S, Koch-Nolte F, Mueller-Dieckmann J, Weiss MS, Mueller-Dieckmann C. Cloning, expression, purification and crystallization as well as X-ray fluorescence and preliminary X-ray diffraction analyses of human ADP-ribosylhydrolase 1. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2009;65: 529–532. 10.1107/S1744309109014067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Mueller-Dieckmann C, Kernstock S, Lisurek M, von Kries JP, Haag F, Weiss MS, et al. The structure of human ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 (ARH3) provides insights into the reversibility of protein ADP-ribosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103: 15026–15031. 10.1073/pnas.0606762103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Pourfarjam Y, Ventura J, Kurinov I, Cho A, Moss J, Kim I-K. Structure of human ADP-ribosyl-acceptor hydrolase 3 bound to ADP-ribose reveals a conformational switch that enables specific substrate recognition. J Biol Chem. 2018;293: 12350–12359. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Ribeiro AJM, Das S, Dawson N, Zaru R, Orchard S, Thornton JM, et al. Emerging concepts in pseudoenzyme classification, evolution, and signaling. Sci Signal. 2019;12 10.1126/scisignal.aat9797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Dubaissi E, Rousseau K, Lea R, Soto X, Nardeosingh S, Schweickert A, et al. A secretory cell type develops alongside multiciliated cells, ionocytes and goblet cells, and provides a protective, anti-infective function in the frog embryonic mucociliary epidermis. Development. 2014;141: 1514–1525. 10.1242/dev.102426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Simon NC, Aktories K, Barbieri JT. Novel bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins: structure and function. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12: 599–611. 10.1038/nrmicro3310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Aktories K, Lang AE, Schwan C, Mannherz HG. Actin as target for modification by bacterial protein toxins. FEBS J. 2011;278: 4526–4543. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08113.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Wegner A, Aktories K. ADP-ribosylated actin caps the barbed ends of actin filaments. J Biol Chem. 1988;263: 13739–13742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Holmes KC, Popp D, Gebhard W, Kabsch W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature. 1990;347: 44–49. 10.1038/347044a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Margarit SM, Davidson W, Frego L, Stebbins CE. A steric antagonism of actin polymerization by a salmonella virulence protein. Structure. 2006;14: 1219–1229. 10.1016/j.str.2006.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira A-M, Johnson R, Jungreis I, Loveland J, et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D766–D773. 10.1093/nar/gky955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Matic I, Ahel I, Hay RT. Reanalysis of phosphoproteomics data uncovers ADP-ribosylation sites. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 771–772. 10.1038/nmeth.2106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Xenopus laevis adprhl1 transcripts and expression detected by exon-specific probes.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S2 Fig. Limited recovery of cardiac myofibril assembly in adprhl1 morpholino injected embryos by transgenic synthesis of recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 proteins.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S3 Fig. Over-expression of recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 does not yield extra 23 kDa Adprhl1.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S4 Fig. Excess Adprhl1 production does not trigger cell proliferation, nor cause cell death.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, pdf)}

S5 Fig. Adprhl1 morpholinos—Position, sequence and activity in embryos.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S6 Fig. Adprhl1 morpholinos—Contrast between RNA-splicing versus translation inhibition.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S7 Fig. Activity of distinct Cas9 RNAs and protein for tyrosinase gene knockout in X. laevis embryos.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S8 Fig. Adprhl1 gRNAs—Full list of gRNA experiments and embryo phenotype frequencies.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(11.2MB, pdf)}

S9 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 3 gives 100% mutation efficiency—S-homeolog DNA sequences.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(508.9KB, pdf)}

S10 Fig. Exon 3 classification of mutated adprhl1 sequences—Missense mutations are likely to retain function.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(482.5KB, pdf)}

S11 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 4 with gAdprhl1-e4-1 gives 82% mutation efficiency—S- and L-homeolog DNA sequences.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(511.8KB, pdf)}

S12 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 4 with adjacent gRNA pairs gives 88% mutation efficiency—S-homeolog DNA sequences.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(509.3KB, pdf)}

S13 Fig. Exon 4 classification of mutated adprhl1 sequences—Incomplete mutation rarely causes heart defects.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S14 Fig. Targeting adprhl1 exon 6 causes near complete mutation and in-frame repair bias—L-homeolog DNA sequences.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S15 Fig. Range of ventricle phenotype severities observed after mutation of adprhl1 exon 6.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S16 Fig. Mammalian Adprhl1 transcript alignments.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.3MB, pdf)}

S1 Raw image. Fig 8 original images.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(9MB, pdf)}

S2 Raw image. S3 Fig original images.

(PDF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(9MB, pdf)}

S1 Data

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(33.9KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

[pone.0235433.ref001] 1.Boogerd CJJ, Moorman AFM, Barnett P. Protein interactions at the heart of cardiac chamber formation. Ann Anat. 2009;191: 505–517. 10.1016/j.aanat.2009.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref002] 2.Desgrange A, Le Garrec J-F, Meilhac SM. Left-right asymmetry in heart development and disease: forming the right loop. Development. 2018;145 10.1242/dev.162776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref003] 3.Lin Y-F, Swinburne I, Yelon D. Multiple influences of blood flow on cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in the embryonic zebrafish heart. Dev Biol. 2012;362: 242–253. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref004] 4.Kelly RG, Buckingham ME, Moorman AF. Heart fields and cardiac morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4 10.1101/cshperspect.a015750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref005] 5.Uribe V, Ramadass R, Dogra D, Rasouli SJ, Gunawan F, Nakajima H, et al. In vivo analysis of cardiomyocyte proliferation during trabeculation. Development. 2018;145 10.1242/dev.164194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref006] 6.Günthel M, Barnett P, Christoffels VM. Development, Proliferation, and Growth of the Mammalian Heart. Mol Ther. 2018;26: 1599–1609. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref007] 7.Bornhorst D, Xia P, Nakajima H, Dingare C, Herzog W, Lecaudey V, et al. Biomechanical signaling within the developing zebrafish heart attunes endocardial growth to myocardial chamber dimensions. Nat Commun. 2019;10: 4113 10.1038/s41467-019-12068-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref008] 8.Fukuda R, Gunawan F, Ramadass R, Beisaw A, Konzer A, Mullapudi ST, et al. Mechanical Forces Regulate Cardiomyocyte Myofilament Maturation via the VCL-SSH1-CFL Axis. Dev Cell. 2019;51: 62–77.e5. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref009] 9.Sidhwani P, Yelon D. Fluid forces shape the embryonic heart: Insights from zebrafish. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;132: 395–416. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref010] 10.Smith SJ, Towers N, Saldanha JW, Shang CA, Mahmood SR, Taylor WR, et al. The cardiac-restricted protein ADP-ribosylhydrolase-like 1 is essential for heart chamber outgrowth and acts on muscle actin filament assembly. Dev Biol. 2016;416: 373–388. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref011] 11.Ramsdell AF, Bernanke JM, Trusk TC. Left-right lineage analysis of the embryonic Xenopus heart reveals a novel framework linking congenital cardiac defects and laterality disease. Development. 2006;133: 1399–1410. 10.1242/dev.02292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref012] 12.Fenix AM, Neininger AC, Taneja N, Hyde K, Visetsouk MR, Garde RJ, et al. Muscle-specific stress fibers give rise to sarcomeres in cardiomyocytes. Elife. 2018;7 10.7554/eLife.42144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref013] 13.Sparrow JC, Schöck F. The initial steps of myofibril assembly: integrins pave the way. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10: 293–298. 10.1038/nrm2634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref014] 14.Du A, Sanger JM, Sanger JW. Cardiac myofibrillogenesis inside intact embryonic hearts. Dev Biol. 2008;318: 236–246. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref015] 15.Rui Y, Bai J, Perrimon N. Sarcomere formation occurs by the assembly of multiple latent protein complexes. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1001208 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref016] 16.Carlisle C, Prill K, Pilgrim D. Chaperones and the Proteasome System: Regulating the Construction and Demolition of Striated Muscle. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;19 10.3390/ijms19010032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref017] 17.Gautel M, Djinović-Carugo K. The sarcomeric cytoskeleton: from molecules to motion. J Exp Biol. 2016;219: 135–145. 10.1242/jeb.124941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref018] 18.Mashimo M, Kato J, Moss J. Structure and function of the ARH family of ADP-ribosyl-acceptor hydrolases. DNA Repair (Amst). 2014;23: 88–94. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref019] 19.Moss J, Stanley SJ, Nightingale MS, Murtagh JJ, Monaco L, Mishima K, et al. Molecular and immunological characterization of ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolases. J Biol Chem. 1992;267: 10481–10488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref020] 20.Oka S, Kato J, Moss J. Identification and characterization of a mammalian 39-kDa poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281: 705–713. 10.1074/jbc.M510290200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref021] 21.Rack JGM, Ariza A, Drown BS, Henfrey C, Bartlett E, Shirai T, et al. (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolases: Structural Basis for Differential Substrate Recognition and Inhibition. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25: 1533–1546.e12. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref022] 22.Beqqali A, Kloots J, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Mummery C, Passier R. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells. 2006;24: 1956–1967. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref023] 23.Norland K, Sveinbjornsson G, Thorolfsdottir RB, Davidsson OB, Tragante V, Rajamani S, et al. Sequence variants with large effects on cardiac electrophysiology and disease. Nat Commun. 2019;10: 4803 10.1038/s41467-019-12682-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref024] 24.Wang F, Shi Z, Cui Y, Guo X, Shi Y-B, Chen Y. Targeted gene disruption in Xenopus laevis using CRISPR/Cas9. Cell Biosci. 2015;5: 15 10.1186/s13578-015-0006-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref025] 25.Wilson LOW, O’Brien AR, Bauer DC. The Current State and Future of CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA Design Tools. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9: 749 10.3389/fphar.2018.00749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref026] 26.Karimi K, Fortriede JD, Lotay VS, Burns KA, Wang DZ, Fisher ME, et al. Xenbase: a genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic model organism database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: D861–D868. 10.1093/nar/gkx936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref027] 27.Session AM, Uno Y, Kwon T, Chapman JA, Toyoda A, Takahashi S, et al. Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis. Nature. 2016;538: 336–343. 10.1038/nature19840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref028] 28.Bae S, Park J, Kim J-S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 1473–1475. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref029] 29.Burger A, Lindsay H, Felker A, Hess C, Anders C, Chiavacci E, et al. Maximizing mutagenesis with solubilized CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Development. 2016;143: 2025–2037. 10.1242/dev.134809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref030] 30.Guo X, Zhang T, Hu Z, Zhang Y, Shi Z, Wang Q, et al. Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis. Development. 2014;141: 707–714. 10.1242/dev.099853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref031] 31.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46: W537–W544. 10.1093/nar/gky379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref032] 32.Naert T, Vleminckx K. CRISPR/Cas9 disease models in zebrafish and Xenopus: The genetic renaissance of fish and frogs. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2018;28: 41–52. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2018.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref033] 33.Tandon P, Conlon F, Furlow JD, Horb ME. Expanding the genetic toolkit in Xenopus: Approaches and opportunities for human disease modeling. Dev Biol. 2017;426: 325–335. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref034] 34.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337: 816–821. 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref035] 35.Ceccaldi R, Liu JC, Amunugama R, Hajdu I, Primack B, Petalcorin MIR, et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Polθ-mediated repair. Nature. 2015;518: 258–262. 10.1038/nature14184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref036] 36.Seol J-H, Shim EY, Lee SE. Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly. Mutat Res. 2018;809: 81–87. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref037] 37.Sive HL, Grainger RM, Harland RM. Early development of Xenopus laevis: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref038] 38.Jiang F, Zhou K, Ma L, Gressel S, Doudna JA. STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY. A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition. Science. 2015;348: 1477–1481. 10.1126/science.aab1452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref039] 39.Wu X, Scott DA, Kriz AJ, Chiu AC, Hsu PD, Dadon DB, et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32: 670–676. 10.1038/nbt.2889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref040] 40.Dickinson ME, Flenniken AM, Ji X, Teboul L, Wong MD, White JK, et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature. 2016;537: 508–514. 10.1038/nature19356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref041] 41.Drenckhahn J-D, Schwarz QP, Gray S, Laskowski A, Kiriazis H, Ming Z, et al. Compensatory growth of healthy cardiac cells in the presence of diseased cells restores tissue homeostasis during heart development. Dev Cell. 2008;15: 521–533. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref042] 42.Laing S, Unger M, Koch-Nolte F, Haag F. ADP-ribosylation of arginine. Amino Acids. 2011;41: 257–269. 10.1007/s00726-010-0676-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref043] 43.Kernstock S, Koch-Nolte F, Mueller-Dieckmann J, Weiss MS, Mueller-Dieckmann C. Cloning, expression, purification and crystallization as well as X-ray fluorescence and preliminary X-ray diffraction analyses of human ADP-ribosylhydrolase 1. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2009;65: 529–532. 10.1107/S1744309109014067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref044] 44.Mueller-Dieckmann C, Kernstock S, Lisurek M, von Kries JP, Haag F, Weiss MS, et al. The structure of human ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 (ARH3) provides insights into the reversibility of protein ADP-ribosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103: 15026–15031. 10.1073/pnas.0606762103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref045] 45.Pourfarjam Y, Ventura J, Kurinov I, Cho A, Moss J, Kim I-K. Structure of human ADP-ribosyl-acceptor hydrolase 3 bound to ADP-ribose reveals a conformational switch that enables specific substrate recognition. J Biol Chem. 2018;293: 12350–12359. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref046] 46.Ribeiro AJM, Das S, Dawson N, Zaru R, Orchard S, Thornton JM, et al. Emerging concepts in pseudoenzyme classification, evolution, and signaling. Sci Signal. 2019;12 10.1126/scisignal.aat9797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref047] 47.Dubaissi E, Rousseau K, Lea R, Soto X, Nardeosingh S, Schweickert A, et al. A secretory cell type develops alongside multiciliated cells, ionocytes and goblet cells, and provides a protective, anti-infective function in the frog embryonic mucociliary epidermis. Development. 2014;141: 1514–1525. 10.1242/dev.102426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref048] 48.Simon NC, Aktories K, Barbieri JT. Novel bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins: structure and function. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12: 599–611. 10.1038/nrmicro3310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref049] 49.Aktories K, Lang AE, Schwan C, Mannherz HG. Actin as target for modification by bacterial protein toxins. FEBS J. 2011;278: 4526–4543. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08113.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref050] 50.Wegner A, Aktories K. ADP-ribosylated actin caps the barbed ends of actin filaments. J Biol Chem. 1988;263: 13739–13742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref051] 51.Holmes KC, Popp D, Gebhard W, Kabsch W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature. 1990;347: 44–49. 10.1038/347044a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref052] 52.Margarit SM, Davidson W, Frego L, Stebbins CE. A steric antagonism of actin polymerization by a salmonella virulence protein. Structure. 2006;14: 1219–1229. 10.1016/j.str.2006.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref053] 53.Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira A-M, Johnson R, Jungreis I, Loveland J, et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D766–D773. 10.1093/nar/gky955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0235433.ref054] 54.Matic I, Ahel I, Hay RT. Reanalysis of phosphoproteomics data uncovers ADP-ribosylation sites. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 771–772. 10.1038/nmeth.2106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Defective heart chamber growth and myofibrillogenesis after knockout of adprhl1 gene function by targeted disruption of the ancestral catalytic active site

Stuart J Smith

Norma Towers

Kim Demetriou

Timothy J Mohun

Roles

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Tyrosinase gRNA sequences

Table 1. Tyrosinase gRNA sequences.

2.2. Adprhl1 gRNA sequences

Table 2. Principal adprhl1 gRNA sequences.

Table 3. Additional adprhl1 gRNA sequences.

2.3. Cas9 and gRNA injection into Xenopus laevis embryos

2.4. Sanger sequence analysis of mosaic adprhl1 exon 3, 4 and 6 mutations in G0-generation X. laevis

2.5. Amplicon-EZ (NGS) sequence analysis of mosaic adprhl1 exon 6 mutations

2.6. Western blot detection of Adprhl1 protein

2.7. Immunocytochemistry of Xenopus hearts

2.8. Animals

3. Results

3.1. Current understanding of Adprhl1 function relies on RNA-splice interfering morpholinos

Fig 1. Cardiac adprhl1 expression and morpholino knockdown in Xenopus embryos.

3.2. Combining morpholino knockdown with transgenic 40 kDa over-expression experiments reveals a complexity to Adprhl1 action

Fig 2. Limited recovery of cardiac myofibril assembly in adprhl1 morpholino injected embryos by transgenic synthesis of recombinant 40 kDa Adprhl1 proteins.

3.3. Limitations of adprhl1 morpholinos—Contrast between RNA-splicing versus translation inhibition

3.4. Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 gene mutation for phenotype discovery in X. laevis embryos using tyrosinase knockout

3.5. Identification of adprhl1 gRNAs that cause defective heart development

Fig 3. Adprhl1 gRNAs—Position, sequence and activity in embryos.

Fig 6. Onset of ventricle growth defects after mutation of adprhl1 exon 6.

Fig 7. Impaired ventricle myofibril assembly caused by mutation of adprhl1 exon 6.

3.6. Exon 3 mutation reveals Cas9 endonuclease operating with 100% efficiency and cellular mosaicism of resulting alleles

3.7. Exon 4 mutation is incomplete so rarely causes heart defects

3.8. Exon 6 mutation is biased towards in-frame repairs yet still causes the highest rate of heart defects

Fig 4. Targeting adprhl1 exon 6 causes near complete mutation and in-frame repair bias—S-homeolog DNA sequences.

Fig 5. Exon 6 classification of mutated adprhl1 sequences—small in-frame deletions responsible for heart defects.

Fig 9. Questions regarding Adprhl1 (and Adprh) action.

3.9. A single nucleotide change to the exon 6 gRNA sequence abolishes its activity

3.10. Myofibril assembly defects observed in adprhl1 exon 6 mutated hearts

3.11. Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3 and 4 are normal—They still produce 25 and 23 kDa ADPRHL1 proteins

Fig 8. Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3 and 4 are normal—they still produce 25 and 23 kDa ADPRHL1 proteins.

4. Discussion

4.1. CRISPR/Cas9 adprhl1 gene knockout in G0-generation embryos

4.2. Is there a link between Adprhl1, ADP-ribosylation on arginine and actin filament dynamics?

4.3. Mapping essential regions of the Adprhl1 protein

4.4. CRISPR/Cas9 experiments and Xenopus embryos

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases