Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246193

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 administered as a dextranomar microsphere biofilm enhances immune responses against human rotavirus in a neonatal malnourished pig model colonized with human infant fecal microbiota

Husheem Michael 1, Francine C Paim 1, Ayako Miyazaki 1,2, Stephanie N Langel 1,¤b, David D Fischer 1,¤a, Juliet Chepngeno 1, Steven D Goodman 3, Gireesh Rajashekara 1, Linda J Saif 1,*, Anastasia Nickolaevna Vlasova 1,*
Editor: Nicholas J Mantis4
PMCID: PMC7886176  PMID: 33592026

Abstract

Human rotavirus (HRV) is a leading cause of diarrhea in children. It causes significant morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where HRV vaccine efficacy is low. The probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle (EcN) 1917 has been widely used in the treatment of enteric diseases in humans. However, repeated doses of EcN are required to achieve maximum beneficial effects. Administration of EcN on a microsphere biofilm could increase probiotic stability and persistence, thus maximizing health benefits without repeated administrations. Our aim was to investigate immune enhancement by the probiotic EcN adhered to a dextranomar microsphere biofilm (EcN biofilm) in a neonatal, malnourished piglet model transplanted with human infant fecal microbiota (HIFM) and infected with rotavirus. To create malnourishment, pigs were fed a reduced amount of bovine milk. Decreased HRV fecal shedding and protection from diarrhea were evident in the EcN biofilm treated piglets compared with EcN suspension and control groups. Moreover, EcN biofilm treatment enhanced natural killer cell activity in blood mononuclear cells (MNCs). Increased frequencies of activated plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) in systemic and intestinal tissues and activated conventional dendritic cells (cDC) in blood and duodenum were also observed in EcN biofilm as compared with EcN suspension treated pigs. Furthermore, EcN biofilm treated pigs had increased frequencies of systemic activated and resting/memory antibody forming B cells and IgA+ B cells in the systemic tissues. Similarly, the mean numbers of systemic and intestinal HRV-specific IgA antibody secreting cells (ASCs), as well as HRV-specific IgA antibody titers in serum and small intestinal contents, were increased in the EcN biofilm treated group. In summary EcN biofilm enhanced innate and B cell immune responses after HRV infection and ameliorated diarrhea following HRV challenge in a malnourished, HIFM pig model.

Introduction

Human rotavirus (HRV) is a leading cause of diarrhea in children. It causes significant morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries [1]. Malnutrition is a major contributor of high mortality due to viral gastroenteritis, including HRV, in countries with low socioeconomic status [24]. A number of studies have shown that malnutrition triggers immune dysfunction, including altered innate and adaptive immune responses, impairment of epithelial cell barrier function and/or dysfunction of intestinal epithelial cells [510].

Probiotics are increasingly used to enhance oral vaccine responses and to treat enteric infections [11] and ulcerative colitis in children [12]. The probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle (EcN) 1917 has been widely used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in humans [13]. EcN lacks virulence factors and possesses unique health-promoting properties [14]. The long term persistence of EcN in humans suggests adaption to a host with an established gut microbiome [15]. Our research group has shown that EcN protected gnotobiotic (Gn) piglets against HRV infection and decreased the severity of diarrhea by modulating innate and adaptive immunity, and protecting the intestinal epithelium [1618].

Oral administration of probiotics is associated with a number of challenges, such as low pH of gastric acid and bile salts in the stomach, effector functions of the host immune system, and competition with commensal and pathogenic bacteria [19]. These factors adversely influence adherence and persistence of probiotics within the host and thus reduce the beneficial effects [20]. Probiotics must survive in gastric acids to reach the small intestine and colonize the host to confer beneficial effects of preventing or moderating gastrointestinal diseases [21]. Encapsulation of lyophilized probiotics have resulted in enhanced bacterial viability [22, 23]. Navarro and his colleagues (2017) have formulated a new synbiotic formulation that employed porous semi-permeable, biocompatible and biodegradable microspheres (dextranomer microspheres) containing readily diffusible prebiotic cargo [24]. Adherence of the probiotic bacteria to the microsphere has a two-fold effect; it facilitates the more formidable biofilm state of probiotics as well as a creates a directed means to provide a high concentration gradient of prebiotics via diffusion of the microsphere cargo. However, currently there are no strategies for improved EcN probiotic efficacy and stability within the malnourished host.

Previously we have established a deficient HIFM-transplanted neonatal pig model that recapitulates major aspects of malnutrition seen in children in impoverished countries [5, 6]. The purpose of this study was to investigate a novel probiotic delivery method to prolong the persistence of probiotics in the gut and to enhance their beneficial effects. We hypothesized that oral administration of EcN attached to the surface of biocompatible dextranomar microspheres in a biofilm state will protect against harsh conditions of the stomach and improve gut stability, thus enhancing their beneficial effects with a single administration compared with the repetitive administration of probiotics in the suspension form, which results in transient and often inconsistent outcomes. In addition, administration of probiotics in their suspension state has modest impact on the host’s microbiome [25]. High doses and repeated administration of probiotics are needed to achieve potential health benefits; however, in impoverished countries this poses challenges due to lack of product availability, the limited health care system, and resources [2628]. Whether the use of the biofilm microsphere can overcome this remains to be established.

The multifactorial pathobiology of malnutrition is associated with a vicious cycle of intestinal dysbiosis, epithelial breaches, altered metabolism, impaired immunity, intestinal inflammation, and malabsorption [29, 30]. Malnutrition increases the risk of diarrheal diseases caused by some, but not all, entero-pathogens. Malnutrition can result in impaired immune defenses that compromise gut integrity, and dybiosis that can influence defense against intestinal pathogens in the malnourished host [31].

This in turn limits the ability of probiotics to repair the intestinal epithelium and establish healthy microbiota. These concerns necessitate further research to enhance the stability and persistence of probiotics in malnourished hosts. Probiotics are generally considered safe, however there are some associated risks. These risks are increased if there are chronic medical conditions that weaken the immune system or if there are gut barrier breeches. Possible risks can include: developing an infection, developing resistance to antibiotics, and developing harmful byproducts from the probiotic supplement. Also, in malnourished hosts due to increased intestinal motility, probiotics can be eliminated from the gut faster limiting their beneficial effects [32, 33].

Furthermore, we aimed to investigate whether a single dose of EcN biofilm microspheres enhances immune responses after HRV infection in a malnourished Gn pig model. Previous transplantation of Gn pigs with probiotic bacteria demonstrated upregulated innate and adaptive immune responses following HRV infection [16, 17, 3437].

In this preliminary study, we report increased innate immune and B cell responses after EcN biofilm treatment that were associated with protection against HRV disease and infection in a neonatal malnourished, HIFM pig model.

Materials and methods

Human Infant Fecal Microbiota (HIFM)

The collection and use of HIFM was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (IRB). With parental consent, sequential fecal samples were collected from a healthy, two-month-old, exclusively breastfed, vaginally delivered infant. Samples were pooled and diluted to 1:20 (wt/vol) in PBS containing 0.05% (vol/vol) cysteine and 30% glycerol and stored at -80°C as described previously [5, 6].

Virus

HRV (VirHRV) Wa strain passaged 25–26 times in Gn piglets was used to orally inoculate piglets at a dose of 1 × 106 fluorescent focus units (FFU) as described previously [5, 6].

Preparation of biofilm dextrananomer microspheres

Anhydrous dextranomer microspheres (Sephadex, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) were used. Anhydrous microspheres were hydrated in growth medium at 50 mg per ml and autoclaved for 20 min. Autoclaved microspheres were removed from solution on a vacuum filter apparatus and collected via sterile loop into a filter-sterilized 1M solution of sucrose. The microsphere mixture was vortexed and incubated for 24 hours at room temperature (RT). Sugar was removed from solution on a vacuum filter apparatus and collected via sterile loop. The microspheres were then added to EcN [1 × 109 colony-forming unit (CFU) per ml], pelleted, washed, and re-suspended in sterile 0.9% saline. EcN was allowed to incubate with the microspheres for 1h at RT to facilitate binding and stored in -80°C in 30% glycerol. Prior to use, microspheres were thawed, mixed 1:1 with Natrel and administered orally. For EcN administered as a suspension, 1 × 109 CFU per ml was pelleted and re-suspended in sterile 0.9% saline in preparation for oral inoculation.

Animal experiments

The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The Ohio State University (OSU). Piglets were derived from near-term sows (purchased from OSU specific pathogen-free swine herd) by hysterectomy and maintained in sterile isolators as described previously [38]. For preliminary investigations, neonatal pigs were randomly assigned to three groups: 1) EcN biofilm (n = 3); 2) EcN suspension (n = 4); and 3) control pigs (n = 3). Pigs were fed a deficient diet of 50% ultra-high temperature pasteurized bovine milk diluted with 50% sterile water which contained half of the recommended protein levels (7.5%) that met or exceeded the National Research Council Animal Care Committee’s guidelines for calories, fat, protein and carbohydrates in suckling pigs. All pigs were confirmed free from bacterial and fungal contamination prior to HIFM transplantation by aerobic and anaerobic cultures of rectal swabs. Pigs were orally inoculated with 2ml of diluted HIFM stock at 4 days of age (post-HIFM transplantation day, PTD 0). The pigs were colonized orally with EcN biofilm or EcN suspension at PTD 11. Pigs were then challenged with VirHRV [1 × 106 FFU, post challenge day (PCD) 0] at PTD 13 and euthanized at PTD 27/PCD 14. Post-VirHRV challenge, rectal swabs were collected daily to assess HRV shedding. Blood, spleen, duodenum, and ileum were collected to isolate mononuclear cells (MNCs) as described previously (31, 35, 36). Jejunum was collected to isolate intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) using modified protocols [18, 3941]. Serum and small intestinal contents (SIC) were collected to determine the HRV specific and total antibody responses [6, 17, 34, 42, 43].

Assessment of clinical signs and detection of HRV shedding

Rectal swabs were collected daily post-VirHRV challenge. Fecal consistency was scored as follows; 0, normal; 1, pasty; 2, semi-liquid; and 3, liquid, and pigs with fecal score more than 1 were considered as diarrheic. Rectal swabs were suspended in 2 ml of minimum essential medium (MEM) (Life technologies, Waltham, MA, USA), clarified by centrifugation for 800 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C, and stored at -20°C until quantification of infectious HRV by a cell culture immunofluorescence (CCIF) assay as previously described [44].

Isolation of mononuclear cells (MNCs)

Systemic (blood and spleen) and intestinal (duodenum and ileum) tissues were collected to isolate MNCs as described previously [36, 45, 46]. The purified MNCs were re-suspended in E-RPMI 1640. The viability of each MNCs preparation was determined by trypan blue exclusion (≥95%).

Flow cytometry analysis

Freshly isolated MNCs were stained to assess frequencies of conventional dendritic cells (DCs) (cDCs, SWC3a+CD4-CD11R1+) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs, SWC3a+CD4+CD11R1-), MHC II and CD103 marker expression on DCs were used in our experiments. Frequencies of IgA+ B lymphocytes were determined by identifying CD79β and IgA expression in MNCs as reported previously [34]. Similarly, frequencies of memory/resting (CD79β+CD2-CD21-) and activated (CD79β+CD2+CD21-) B cells among systemic and intestinal MNCs were determined as described previously [34]. Appropriate isotype matched control antibodies were included. Subsequently, 50,000 events were acquired per sample using BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using C6 flow sampler software.

NK cytotoxicity assay

Total blood MNCs and K562 cells were used as effector and target cells, respectively. Effector: target cell ratios of 10:1, 5:1, 1:1 and 0.5:1 were used and the assay was done as described previously [47, 48].

HRV-specific and total antibody responses

The HRV specific and total antibody titers in serum and SIC were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously [6, 17, 34, 42, 43]. To determine the intestinal antibody responses, small intestinal contents (SIC) were collected with protease inhibitors in the medium.

HRV-specific Antibody Secreting Cells (ASCs) responses

HRV and isotype-specific antibody secretion in MNCs isolated from blood, spleen, duodenum and ileum were analyzed by ELISPOT assay as described previously [17, 34, 42, 43].

Isolation of Intestinal Epithelial Cells (IECs) and extraction of RNA

The IECs were isolated from jejunum (mid gut) using a modified protocol adapted from Paim et al. [18, 49]. The viability and numbers of IECs were determined by the trypan blue exclusion method (70–80%). IECs were stored at −80°C in 500 μl of RNAlater tissue collection buffer (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) until further analysis. Total RNA from IECs was extracted using Direct-Zol RNA Miniprep (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentrations and purity were measured using NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) of CgA, MUC2, PCNA, SOX9 and villin gene mRNA levels in Intestinal Epithelial Cells (IECs)

qRT-PCR was performed using equal amounts of total RNA (75 ng) with Power SYBR Green RNA-to-CT 1 step RT-PCR kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The primers for enteroendocrine cells chromogramin A (CgA), goblet cells mucin 2 (MUC2), transient amplifying progenitor cells proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), intestinal epithelial stem cells transcription factor SRY-box9 (SOX9), enterocytes (villin) and β-actin were based on previously published data [18, 3941]. Relative gene expression of CgA, MUC2, PCNA, SOX9 and villin were normalized to β-actin and expressed as fold change using the 2-ΔΔCt method [50].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6 (GraphPad software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Log10 transformed isotype ELISA antibody titers that were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Data represent the mean numbers of HRV specific antibody secreting cells per 5 × 105 mononuclear cells and analyzed using non-parametric t-test (Mann-Whitney). HRV shedding and diarrheal analysis were performed using two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest. *P values < 0.05, **P values < 0.01, and ***P values < 0.001. Error bars indicate the standard error of mean.

Results

EcN biofilm treatment reduced fecal HRV shedding and protected malnourished pigs from diarrhea post HRV challenge

Analysis revealed that EcN biofilm treated malnourished pigs had shorter and delayed onset of HRV shedding as compared with the EcN suspension and the control group pigs (Table 1). A significant reduction in fecal virus peak titers shed was observed both in EcN biofilm (GMT = 97.9 FFU/ml) and EcN suspension groups (GMT = 112.0 FFU/ml), as compared with the control pigs (GMT = 439.7 FFU/ml). In addition, EcN biofilm and EcN suspension groups had decreased peak shedding titers at PCD 2 as compared with that of control pigs (S1 Fig). EcN biofilm treatment shortened the mean duration of viral shedding to 2.3 days as compared with 4.0 and 6.0 days in EcN suspension treated and control pigs, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of fecal VirHRV shedding and diarrhea following VirHRV challenge (PCD 1–6).

HRV Sheddingb Diarrheac
Groupsa N Geometric mean of peak titer shed (FFU/ml)d Mean days to onset of HRV shedding Mean duration of HRV shedding Diarrhea (%) Mean cumulative fecal scoree Mean days of onset of diarrhea Mean duration of diarrheaf
EcN biofilm 3 97.9* 1.3 2.3 0 4.0* N/A N/A
EcN suspension 4 112.0** 1.0 4.0 50.0 5.5** 2.5 1.3
Control 3 439.7*** 1.0 6.0 66.7 4.7*** 3.5 1.0

a Gnotobiotic (Gn) pigs were fed deficient diet and were transplanted with human infant fecal microbiota (HIFM) at 4 days of age, post-HIFM transplantation day (PTD) 0. Pigs were colonized with a single dose of EcN biofilm and EcN suspension at PTD 11, subsequently challenged with virulent human rotavirus (VirHRV) at PTD 13 and euthanized at PTD27/post challenge day (PCD) 14.

b Determined by cell culture immunofluorescence (CCIF) assay and expressed as FFU/ml.

c Pigs with fecal score > 1 were considered as diarrheic. Fecal consistency was scored as follows: 0, normal; 1, pasty; 2, semi-liquid; and 3, liquid.

d Samples negative for HRV detection (< 25) were assigned a titer of 12.5 for statistical analysis. Means in the same column with different asterisks differ significantly (determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttest, p < 0.05).

e Mean of total of fecal scores from PCD 1–6.

f Mean of total days with fecal score > 1.

N/A = data not available.

Control pigs developed diarrhea (66.7%) at 3.5 days post HRV challenge, continuing for 1.0 days with mean cumulative fecal score 4.7 (Table 1). Single administration of EcN biofilm microspheres completely protected the pigs from diarrhea (Table 1). However, administration of EcN suspension protected only 50% of the pigs from diarrhea. No significant differences were observed for mean days to diarrheal onset (2.5 days), mean cumulative fecal score (5.5) and the mean duration of diarrhea (1.3 days) when they are compared with those in the control group (Table 1). These findings suggest that administration of EcN biofilm suppressed HRV infection greater than EcN administered in suspension.

EcN biofilm treatment enhanced natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity in blood mononuclear cells (MNCs), increased the frequencies of activated pDCs in systemic and intestinal tissues, and increased activated cDCs in the blood and duodenum

NK cell cytotoxicity in blood MNCs was significantly enhanced in EcN biofilm treatment compared with control pigs (Fig 1A). On the other hand, frequency of apoptotic MNCs were marginally decreased in EcN biofilm (3%) compared with EcN suspension (5%) and control (3.5%) pigs in blood (S2 Fig).

Fig 1. EcN biofilm enhanced NK cell activity in blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) and significantly increased the frequencies of activated pDCs in systemic and intestinal tissues and increased activated cDCs in blood and duodenum (significantly).

Fig 1

(a) Blood MNCs and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) stained K562 tumor cells were used as effector and target cells, respectively, and co-cultured at set ratios to assess the NK cytotoxic function, (EcN biofilm vs control group). The effector: target cell co-cultures were stained with 7-Aminoactinomycin D (7AAD) after 12 hours of incubation at 37°C, and the frequencies of CFSE-7AAD double positive cells (lysed K562 target cells) were assessed by flow cytometry. Mean frequencies of activated (b) pDCs and (c) cDCs in systemic and intestinal tissues. Data represent means ± SEM. Significant differences (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) are indicated. Gnotobiotic pigs were transplanted with human infant fecal microbiota (HIFM) at 4 days of age, post-HIFM transplantation day (PTD) 0. Pigs were fed a deficient diet. Probiotic was given to the respective groups at PTD 11, followed by challenge with virulent human rotavirus (HRV) on PTD 13/post-challenge day (PCD) 0 and pigs were euthanized on PTD 27/PCD 14.

EcN biofilm treatment significantly increased the frequencies of activated pDC in systemic and intestinal tissues as compared with EcN suspension and the control pigs (Fig 1B). Moreover, EcN biofilm treatment significantly increased the frequencies of activated cDC in duodenum while numerically in blood (Fig 1C). There were no differences observed in other tissues. CD103+ cDC were increased (numerically) in spleen and intestinal tissues in EcN biofilm treated group as compared with EcN suspension and control pigs (S3 Fig). There were no differences observed in blood.

EcN biofilm treatment significantly increased the frequencies of activated antibody secreting B cells in systemic tissues, resting antibody forming B cells in blood, and IgA+ B cells in spleen

EcN biofilm treated malnourished pigs had significantly increased frequencies of activated antibody forming B cells in systemic tissues as compared with EcN suspension or the control pigs (S4A and S4B Fig). The frequency of IgA+ B cells in the spleen (significantly, S4C Fig) and blood (numerically, S4D Fig) increased in EcN biofilm treatment compared with EcN suspension and control pigs. Moreover, the frequency of resting/memory antibody forming B cells was significantly increased in blood in EcN biofilm compared with EcN suspension treated pigs (S4E Fig). These findings suggest that EcN biofilm treatment enhanced B cell immune response in systemic tissues, although no significant trends were observed in intestinal tissues.

EcN biofilm treatment increased the number of HRV-specific Antibody Secreting Cells (ASCs) in systemic and intestinal tissues, and increased HRV-specific IgA antibody titers in serum and Small Intestinal Contents (SIC)

Coinciding with decreased HRV shedding and protection from diarrhea, the mean numbers of HRV-specific IgA ASCs were increased in systemic and intestinal tissues of EcN biofilm treatment compared with EcN suspension and control group pigs (Fig 2A and 2B). A similar trend was observed with HRV-specific IgG ASCs (S5 Fig). HRV-specific IgM ASC numbers were below the detection limit in systemic and intestinal tissues. HRV-specific IgA antibody titers were increased in serum (significantly) and SIC (numerically) of EcN biofilm treated pigs compared with EcN suspension and control group pigs, coinciding with increased HRV-specific IgA ASCs (Fig 2C and 2D). Similar trends were observed with HRV-specific IgG antibody titers in serum (S6 Fig). In addition, total IgA concentration was increased (numerically) in serum samples of EcN biofilm treated pigs compared with EcN suspension or control group pigs (S7 Fig). No significant trends were observed in total and HRV-specific IgG in SIC (S8 Fig). These results indicate that EcN biofilm treatment enhanced B cell formation and clonal expansion of antibody producing cells in malnourished, HIFM transplanted pigs infected with HRV.

Fig 2. EcN biofilm significantly increased HRV-specific IgA Antibody Secreting Cells (ASCs) in systemic and intestinal tissues and increased HRV-specific IgA antibody titers in serum and Small Intestinal Contents (SIC).

Fig 2

(a) HRV-specific IgA ASCs in systemic cells; (b) HRV-specific IgA ASCs in intestinal cells; (c) HRV-specific IgA antibody titers in serum and (d) SIC. No significant differences were observed in intestinal tissues. Data represent means ± SEM. Significant differences (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001) are indicated. Gnotobiotic pigs were transplanted with human infant fecal microbiota (HIFM) at 4 days of age, post-HIFM transplantation day (PTD) 0. Pigs were fed a deficient diet. Probiotic was given to respective groups at PTD 11, followed by challenge with virulent human rotavirus (HRV) on PTD 13/post-challenge day (PCD) 0 and pigs were euthanized on PTD 27/PCD 14.

EcN biofilm treatment significantly upregulated the expression of CgA and SOX9 mRNA levels in jejunal epithelial cells

Gene expression levels of CgA, SOX9, villin, MUC2, and PCNA were assessed from jejunal epithelial cells. The relative mRNA levels of CgA, SOX9, and villin genes were increased in jejunal epithelial cells of EcN biofilm compared with EcN suspension and control treated malnourished pigs (Fig 3A–3C). This coincided with the decreased severity of HRV shedding and diarrhea. There were no differences in gene expression levels for MUC2 and PCNA in jejunal epithelial cells of EcN biofilm and EcN suspension treated pigs (S9 Fig).

Fig 3. EcN biofilm upregulated the expression of various cell components in jejunal epithelial cells.

Fig 3

(a) Relative mRNA levels of enteroendocrine cells chromogramin A (CgA), (b) intestinal epithelial stem cells (SOX9), and (c) enterocytes (villin) in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension groups measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-PCR), normalized to β-actin gene. Graphs represent means ± SEM. Significant difference (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, relative to control) are indicated. Gnotobiotic pigs were transplanted with human infant fecal microbiota (HIFM) at 4 days of age, post-HIFM transplantation day (PTD) 0. Pigs were fed a deficient diet. Probiotic was given to respective groups at PTD 11, followed by challenge with virulent human rotavirus (VirHRV) on PTD 13/post-challenge day (PCD) 0 and pigs were euthanized on PTD 27/PCD 14.

Discussion

Using a malnourished and HIFM transplanted pig model, we showed that compared with EcN administered as suspension, EcN administered as a biofilm on dextranomer microspheres enhanced multiple aspects of the immune response. EcN biofilm treated pigs had significantly reduced titers of virus shedding and diarrhea following VirHRV challenge compared with EcN suspension treated and control pigs. The presence of HRV-specific IgA antibodies in pigs is strongly correlated with protection from HRV infection [46, 51, 52]. Moreover, our study demonstrated for the first time that EcN biofilm treatment enhanced HRV specific-IgA and IgG ASCs in circulation and gut, enhanced HRV-specific IgA and IgG antibody titers in serum and HRV-specific IgA antibody titers in SIC, which collectively coincided with reduced diarrhea and virus shedding. Total IgA concentration was marginally increased in serum of EcN biofilm treated malnourished pigs (data not shown). Although not examined in this study, EcN biofilm treatment might have increased colonization in the gut, inhibiting competition by other members of the gut microbiota [53, 54]. It is possible that the observed effects of EcN biofilm treatment on systemic IgA responses could be mediated by direct modulation of host immune responses, suggesting that biofilm microspheres maybe more stable and persistent compared to probiotics in suspension in the host’s gastrointestinal system.

Innate immune responses are critical as a first line of defense, limiting RV replication and disease severity in the host [16, 55]. EcN biofilm treatment enhanced innate immune responses. For example, blood NK cell cytotoxicity was higher in EcN biofilm treatment compared to EcN suspension treated and control groups. This suggests that EcN as a biofilm promoted innate immune responses, improving protection against HRV infection in vivo. Also the frequency of apoptotic blood MNCs was slightly reduced in EcN biofilm treated pigs compared with EcN suspension treatment and control pigs (data not shown).

DCs play a key role in probiotic bacteria stimulation of the innate immune system [56, 57] and pDCs were shown to contribute to RV clearance in a murine model [58]. Moreover, DC MHC II expression is a marker for maturation [59]. In our study, higher frequencies of activated pDCs in systemic and intestinal tissues and activated cDCs in the blood and duodenum were observed in EcN biofilm treated pigs compared with EcN suspension treated piglets. These results suggest that the biofilm provided stability to the probiotic and thus enhanced maturation of systemic and intestinal activated DC, promoting pDC development and increased IgA antibody responses in probiotic biofilm treated piglets compared with probiotic suspension treated pigs [60, 61]. Enhancing the protective effects of pDCs via an EcN biofilm may be critical for protection against enteric pathogens [16]. Expression of CD103 (αEβ7 integrin) has been demonstrated to influence cellular intraepithelial morphogenesis and motility [62], which are critical for the proper communication among pathogen, DCs, and T and B lymphocytes. We observed that EcN biofilm treatment increased CD103 expression by DCs and this could have further enhanced innate immune responses against HRV and reduced HRV infection. Consequently, enhancement of signaling between DCs and T/B lymphocytes could have contributed to improved antigen presentation to the lymphocytes resulting in increased HRV-specific IgA ASCs, IgA antibody titers, and increased NK cell activity in EcN biofilm treated pigs.

The increased frequencies of activated and resting/memory B cells were enhanced in EcN biofilm treated pigs that coincided with increased frequencies of pDCs in the intestine. These results are similar to our previous studies where EcN protected against HRV infection [34, 37]. The frequency of IgA+ B cells were increased in EcN biofilm treated pigs in systemic tissues, suggesting that EcN as a biofilm may potentiate systemic IgA responses. These responses and the increased HRV-specific IgA antibody responses in serum and SIC coincided with reduced HRV diarrhea and shedding.

An upregulation of the enteroendocrine CgA gene in EcN biofilm treated piglets could be reflective of greater protection of the epithelial intestinal barrier. Other studies have shown that enteroendocrine cells that produce hormones promoting repair of intestinal epithelium are activated after treatment with probiotics [63, 64]. In our investigations, we observed an upregulation of stem cell specific-gene SOX9 in the EcN biofilm treated pigs greater than in EcN suspension treated pigs. SOX9 plays an important role in the proliferative capacity of stem cells to replenish different lineages of IECs [65]. Moreover, we demonstrated that EcN biofilm treatment increased mRNA levels of the enterocyte-specific gene villin. It is likely that biofilm microspheres supported a greater number of villin cells and epithelial cells and probiotic adherence. This likely modulated the effects of HRV infection by increasing villin gene expression of enterocytes, repairing/restoring functional enterocytes and increasing barrier and absorptive functions during HRV-induced diarrhea.

Our results suggest that using a microsphere biofilm as a novel delivery system for EcN compared to EcN as a suspension may have increased survival of the probiotics at low pH in the stomach and supported increased adherence to intestinal epithelial cells [24], thereby promoting probiotic longevity, survival, and persistence in the malnourished host. Additionally, the EcN biofilm enhanced innate and B cell immune responses in the HRV infected HIFM neonatal pigs. Our results support previous work demonstrating protection against experimental necrotizing enterocolitis in a rat model after treatment with Lactobacillus reuteri adhered to dextranomer microspheres [66]. Recently, Shelby et al. 2020 and colleagues have demonstrated that a single dose of Lactobacillus reuteri in its biofilm state reduces the severity and incidence of experimental C. difficile infection and necrotizing enterocolitis when administered as both prophylactic and treatment therapy [67, 68]. Moreover, Navarro and colleagues demonstrated that probiotic bacterium L. reuteri delivered in association with dextranomar microspheres adhered in greater numbers, conferred resistance to clearance, transported nutrients that promote bacterial growth, promoted the production of the antimicrobial reuterin or histamine, resisted acid-mediated killing, and better supported adherence to intestinal epithelial cells, thereby promoting persistence in the gut [24]. Thus, we this agreed with our hypothesis that EcN adhered to dextranomer microspheres acted similarly during HRV infection in the neonatal malnourished HIFM pig model. In the future, we have plan to increase to number of piglets and study different age groups to further investigate the biofilm impact.

Thus, our results suggest that low cost, stable, and efficient dietary supplementation of EcN coupled with a dextranomer microsphere biofilm can protect against HRV infection in a physiologically relevant malnourished HIFM pig model. Similar studies are warranted in children to moderate the symptoms of other gastrointestinal infections and disorders including gastritis and chronic inflammatory bowel disease.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. HRV shedding post-VirHRV challenge in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension, and control pigs.

(PPTX)

S2 Fig. Frequencies of apoptotic MNCs (PI-/Annexin-APC-) among total MNCs isolated from blood.

(PPTX)

S3 Fig. EcN biofilm altered the frequencies of SWC3a+CD4-CD103+ conventional dendritic cells in blood and intestinal tissues.

(PPTX)

S4 Fig. EcN biofilm significantly increased the frequencies of activated B cells in systemic tissues and IgA+ B cells in spleen.

(PPTX)

S5 Fig. EcN biofilm significantly increased HRV-specific IgG antibody secreting cells (ASCs) in systemic.

(PPTX)

S6 Fig. EcN biofilm increased geometric mean titer HRV specific IgG in serum.

(PPTX)

S7 Fig. EcN biofilm increased total Ig concentration in serum.

(PPTX)

S8 Fig

Total (a) and HRV-specific IgG (b) in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension, and control pigs in small intestinal contents (SIC).

(PPTX)

S9 Fig

Relative mRNA levels of MUC2 (a) and PCNA (b) in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension, and control group measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-PCR), normalized to β-actin gene.

(PPTX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Marcia Lee and Rosario Candelero-Rueda for their technical assistance and Dr. Juliette Hanson, Ronna Wood, Jeffery Ogg, Megan Strother and Sara Tallmadge for animal care assistance.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP 1117467), the NIAID, NIH (R01 A1099451), federal and state funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University and from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) supplemental grant funds.

References

  • 1.Tate JE, Burton AH, Boschi-Pinto C, Steele AD, Duque J, et al. (2012) 2008 estimate of worldwide rotavirus-associated mortality in children younger than 5 years before the introduction of universal rotavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 12: 136–141. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70253-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clark A, Black R, Tate J, Roose A, Kotloff K, et al. (2017) Estimating global, regional and national rotavirus deaths in children aged <5 years: Current approaches, new analyses and proposed improvements. PLoS One 12: e0183392 10.1371/journal.pone.0183392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nelson EA, Glass RI (2010) Rotavirus: realising the potential of a promising vaccine. Lancet 376: 568–570. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60896-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.UNICEF W (2017) World Bank Group Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates Levels and trends in child malnutrition.
  • 5.Vlasova AN, Paim FC, Kandasamy S, Alhamo MA, Fischer DD, et al. (2017) Protein Malnutrition Modifies Innate Immunity and Gene Expression by Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Human Rotavirus Infection in Neonatal Gnotobiotic Pigs. mSphere 2 10.1128/mSphere.00046-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fischer DD, Kandasamy S, Paim FC, Langel SN, Alhamo MA, et al. (2017) Protein Malnutrition Alters Tryptophan and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Homeostasis and Adaptive Immune Responses in Human Rotavirus-Infected Gnotobiotic Pigs with Human Infant Fecal Microbiota Transplant. Clin Vaccine Immunol 24 10.1128/CVI.00172-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu J, Bolick DT, Kolling GL, Fu Z, Guerrant RL (2016) Protein Malnutrition Impairs Intestinal Epithelial Cell Turnover, a Potential Mechanism of Increased Cryptosporidiosis in a Murine Model. Infect Immun 84: 3542–3549. 10.1128/IAI.00705-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hughes SM, Amadi B, Mwiya M, Nkamba H, Tomkins A, et al. (2009) Dendritic cell anergy results from endotoxemia in severe malnutrition. J Immunol 183: 2818–2826. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iyer SS, Chatraw JH, Tan WG, Wherry EJ, Becker TC, et al. (2012) Protein energy malnutrition impairs homeostatic proliferation of memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol 188: 77–84. 10.4049/jimmunol.1004027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rytter MJ, Kolte L, Briend A, Friis H, Christensen VB (2014) The immune system in children with malnutrition—a systematic review. PLoS One 9: e105017 10.1371/journal.pone.0105017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Szajewska H, Mrukowicz JZ (2001) Probiotics in the treatment and prevention of acute infectious diarrhea in infants and children: a systematic review of published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 33 Suppl 2: S17–25. 10.1097/00005176-200110002-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sanders ME, Guarner F, Guerrant R, Holt PR, Quigley EM, et al. (2013) An update on the use and investigation of probiotics in health and disease. Gut 62: 787–796. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kruis W, Fric P, Pokrotnieks J, Lukas M, Fixa B, et al. (2004) Maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis with the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 is as effective as with standard mesalazine. Gut 53: 1617–1623. 10.1136/gut.2003.037747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schultz M (2008) Clinical use of E. coli Nissle 1917 in inflammatory bowel disease Clinical use of E. coli Nissle 1917 in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14: 1012–1018. 10.1002/ibd.20377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kleta S, Steinrück H., Breves G., Duncker S., Laturnus C., Wieler L.H., Schierack P. (2006) Detection and distribution of probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 clones in swine herds in Germany. J Appl Microbiol 101:1357–66 101 1357–1366. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03019.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vlasova AN, Shao L, Kandasamy S, Fischer DD, Rauf A, et al. (2016) Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 protects gnotobiotic pigs against human rotavirus by modulating pDC and NK-cell responses. Eur J Immunol 46: 2426–2437. 10.1002/eji.201646498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kandasamy S, Vlasova AN, Fischer D, Kumar A, Chattha KS, et al. (2016) Differential Effects of Escherichia coli Nissle and Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain GG on Human Rotavirus Binding, Infection, and B Cell Immunity. J Immunol 196: 1780–1789. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paim FC, Langel SN, Fischer DD, Kandasamy S, Shao L, et al. (2016) Effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and Ciprofloxacin on small intestinal epithelial cell mRNA expression in the neonatal piglet model of human rotavirus infection. Gut Pathog 8: 66 10.1186/s13099-016-0148-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ding WK, Shah NP (2007) Acid, bile, and heat tolerance of free and microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. J Food Sci 72: M446–450. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00565.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li XGC X.Y., Sun Z.W., Park H.J., Cha D.-S. (2011) Preparation of alginate/chitosan/carboxymethyl chitosan complex microcapsules and application in Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393. Carbohydr Polym: 1479–1485. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Muthukumarasamy PA-W P., Holley R.A. (2006) Stability of Lactobacillus reuteri in different types of microcapsules. J Food Sci 71: 20–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cook MT, Tzortzis G, Charalampopoulos D, Khutoryanskiy VV (2012) Microencapsulation of probiotics for gastrointestinal delivery. J Control Release 162: 56–67. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kailasapathy K (2014) Microencapsulation for gastrointestinal delivery of probiotic bacteria,” in Nano Microencapsulation Foods. WileyBlackwell: 167–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Navarro JB, Mashburn-Warren L, Bakaletz LO, Bailey MT, Goodman SD (2017) Enhanced Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus reuteri When Delivered as a Biofilm on Dextranomer Microspheres That Contain Beneficial Cargo. Front Microbiol 8: 489 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Underwood MA, Arriola J, Gerber CW, Kaveti A, Kalanetra KM, et al. (2014) Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis in experimental necrotizing enterocolitis: alterations in inflammation, innate immune response, and the microbiota. Pediatr Res 76: 326–333. 10.1038/pr.2014.102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bahadoria PS, Mahapatra B.S. (2001) Prospects, technological aspects, and limitations of probiotics- a world wide review. Eur J Food Res Rev 1: 23–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ng EW, Yeung M, Tong PS (2011) Effects of yogurt starter cultures on the survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int J Food Microbiol 145: 169–175. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cogan TM, Beresford TP, Steele J, Broadbent J, Shah NP, et al. (2007) Invited review: Advances in starter cultures and cultured foods. J Dairy Sci 90: 4005–4021. 10.3168/jds.2006-765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guerrant RL, Oria RB, Moore SR, Oria MO, Lima AA (2008) Malnutrition as an enteric infectious disease with long-term effects on child development. Nutr Rev 66: 487–505. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00082.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prendergast AJ, Kelly P (2016) Interactions between intestinal pathogens, enteropathy and malnutrition in developing countries. Curr Opin Infect Dis 29: 229–236. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ibrahim MK, Zambruni M, Melby CL, Melby PC (2017) Impact of Childhood Malnutrition on Host Defense and Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 30: 919–971. 10.1128/CMR.00119-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nahaisi MH RS, Noratto GD (2014) Probiotics as a Strategy to Improve Overall Human Health in Developing Countries. J Prob Health 2: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maldonado Galdeano C, Cazorla SI, Lemme Dumit JM, Velez E, Perdigon G (2019) Beneficial Effects of Probiotic Consumption on the Immune System. Ann Nutr Metab 74: 115–124. 10.1159/000496426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kandasamy S, Chattha KS, Vlasova AN, Rajashekara G, Saif LJ (2014) Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria enhance mucosal B cell responses and differentially modulate systemic antibody responses to an oral human rotavirus vaccine in a neonatal gnotobiotic pig disease model. Gut Microbes 5: 639–651. 10.4161/19490976.2014.969972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chattha KS, Vlasova AN, Kandasamy S, Esseili MA, Siegismund C, et al. (2013) Probiotics and colostrum/milk differentially affect neonatal humoral immune responses to oral rotavirus vaccine. Vaccine 31: 1916–1923. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chattha KS, Vlasova AN, Kandasamy S, Rajashekara G, Saif LJ (2013) Divergent immunomodulating effects of probiotics on T cell responses to oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine and virulent human rotavirus infection in a neonatal gnotobiotic piglet disease model. J Immunol 191: 2446–2456. 10.4049/jimmunol.1300678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vlasova AN, Chattha KS, Kandasamy S, Liu Z, Esseili M, et al. (2013) Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria promote immune homeostasis by modulating innate immune responses to human rotavirus in neonatal gnotobiotic pigs. PLoS One 8: e76962 10.1371/journal.pone.0076962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meyer RC, Bohl EH, Kohler EM (1964) Procurement and Maintenance of Germ-Free Seine for Microbiological Investigations. Appl Microbiol 12: 295–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gonzalez LM, Williamson I, Piedrahita JA, Blikslager AT, Magness ST (2013) Cell lineage identification and stem cell culture in a porcine model for the study of intestinal epithelial regeneration. PLoS One 8: e66465 10.1371/journal.pone.0066465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nossol C, Diesing AK, Walk N, Faber-Zuschratter H, Hartig R, et al. (2011) Air-liquid interface cultures enhance the oxygen supply and trigger the structural and functional differentiation of intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC). Histochem Cell Biol 136: 103–115. 10.1007/s00418-011-0826-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Collado-Romero M, Arce C, Ramirez-Boo M, Carvajal A, Garrido JJ (2010) Quantitative analysis of the immune response upon Salmonella typhimurium infection along the porcine intestinal gut. Vet Res 41: 23 10.1051/vetres/2009072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kandasamy S, Chattha KS, Vlasova AN, Saif LJ (2014) Prenatal vitamin A deficiency impairs adaptive immune responses to pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq(R)) in a neonatal gnotobiotic pig model. Vaccine 32: 816–824. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chattha KS, Kandasamy S, Vlasova AN, Saif LJ (2013) Vitamin A deficiency impairs adaptive B and T cell responses to a prototype monovalent attenuated human rotavirus vaccine and virulent human rotavirus challenge in a gnotobiotic piglet model. PLoS One 8: e82966 10.1371/journal.pone.0082966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ward LA, Yuan L, Rosen BI, To TL, Saif LJ (1996) Development of mucosal and systemic lymphoproliferative responses and protective immunity to human group A rotaviruses in a gnotobiotic pig model. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 3: 342–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang W, Azevedo MS, Wen K, Gonzalez A, Saif LJ, et al. (2008) Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus enhances the immunogenicity of an oral rotavirus vaccine in gnotobiotic pigs. Vaccine 26: 3655–3661. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yuan L, Ward LA, Rosen BI, To TL, Saif LJ (1996) Systematic and intestinal antibody-secreting cell responses and correlates of protective immunity to human rotavirus in a gnotobiotic pig model of disease. J Virol 70: 3075–3083. 10.1128/JVI.70.5.3075-3083.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Annamalai T, Saif LJ, Lu Z, Jung K (2015) Age-dependent variation in innate immune responses to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection in suckling versus weaned pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 168: 193–202. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cario E (2010) Toll-like receptors in inflammatory bowel diseases: a decade later. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16: 1583–1597. 10.1002/ibd.21282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pan D, Das A, Liu D, Veazey RS, Pahar B (2012) Isolation and characterization of intestinal epithelial cells from normal and SIV-infected rhesus macaques. PLoS One 7: e30247 10.1371/journal.pone.0030247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3: 1101–1108. 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Azevedo MS, Yuan L, Iosef C, Chang KO, Kim Y, et al. (2004) Magnitude of serum and intestinal antibody responses induced by sequential replicating and nonreplicating rotavirus vaccines in gnotobiotic pigs and correlation with protection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11: 12–20. 10.1128/cdli.11.1.12-20.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.To TL, Ward LA, Yuan L, Saif LJ (1998) Serum and intestinal isotype antibody responses and correlates of protective immunity to human rotavirus in a gnotobiotic pig model of disease. J Gen Virol 79 (Pt 11): 2661–2672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Louis P, O’Byrne CP (2010) Life in the gut: microbial responses to stress in the gastrointestinal tract. Sci Prog 93: 7–36. 10.3184/003685009X12605525292307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kamada N, Chen GY, Inohara N, Nunez G (2013) Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota. Nat Immunol 14: 685–690. 10.1038/ni.2608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Holloway G, Coulson BS (2013) Innate cellular responses to rotavirus infection. J Gen Virol 94: 1151–1160. 10.1099/vir.0.051276-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Foligne B, Zoumpopoulou G, Dewulf J, Ben Younes A, Chareyre F, et al. (2007) A key role of dendritic cells in probiotic functionality. PLoS One 2: e313 10.1371/journal.pone.0000313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sugimura T, Takahashi H, Jounai K, Ohshio K, Kanayama M, et al. (2015) Effects of oral intake of plasmacytoid dendritic cells-stimulative lactic acid bacterial strain on pathogenesis of influenza-like illness and immunological response to influenza virus. Br J Nutr 114: 727–733. 10.1017/S0007114515002408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kruis W, Chrubasik S, Boehm S, Stange C, Schulze J (2012) A double-blind placebo-controlled trial to study therapeutic effects of probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 in subgroups of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 27: 467–474. 10.1007/s00384-011-1363-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Winzler C, Rovere P, Rescigno M, Granucci F, Penna G, et al. (1997) Maturation stages of mouse dendritic cells in growth factor-dependent long-term cultures. J Exp Med 185: 317–328. 10.1084/jem.185.2.317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Deal EM, Lahl K, Narvaez CF, Butcher EC, Greenberg HB (2013) Plasmacytoid dendritic cells promote rotavirus-induced human and murine B cell responses. J Clin Invest 123: 2464–2474. 10.1172/JCI60945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tezuka H, Abe Y, Asano J, Sato T, Liu J, et al. (2011) Prominent role for plasmacytoid dendritic cells in mucosal T cell-independent IgA induction. Immunity 34: 247–257. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schlickum S, Sennefelder H, Friedrich M, Harms G, Lohse MJ, et al. (2008) Integrin alpha E(CD103)beta 7 influences cellular shape and motility in a ligand-dependent fashion. Blood 112: 619–625. 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hajela N, Nair GB, Abraham P, Ganguly NK (2012) Health impact of probiotics—vision and opportunities. Gut Pathog 4: 1 10.1186/1757-4749-4-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Skipper M, Lewis J (2000) Getting to the guts of enteroendocrine differentiation. Nat Genet 24: 3–4. 10.1038/71653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Carulli AJ, Samuelson LC, Schnell S (2014) Unraveling intestinal stem cell behavior with models of crypt dynamics. Integr Biol (Camb) 6: 243–257. 10.1039/c3ib40163d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Olson JK, Rager TM, Navarro JB, Mashburn-Warren L, Goodman SD, et al. (2016) Harvesting the benefits of biofilms: A novel probiotic delivery system for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg 51: 936–941. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shelby RD, Janzow GE, Mashburn-Warren L, Galley J, Tengberg N, et al. (2020) A novel probiotic therapeutic in a murine model of Clostridioides difficile colitis. Gut Microbes 12: 1814119 10.1080/19490976.2020.1814119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Olson JK, Navarro JB, Allen JM, McCulloh CJ, Mashburn-Warren L, et al. (2018) An enhanced Lactobacillus reuteri biofilm formulation that increases protection against experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 315: G408–G419. 10.1152/ajpgi.00078.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nicholas J Mantis

21 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-32708

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 administered as a dextranomar microsphere biofilm enhances immune responses against human rotavirus in a neonatal malnourished pig model colonized with human infant fecal microbiota

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Vlasova,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 04 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nicholas J Mantis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP 1117467), the NIAID,

 NIH (R01 A1099451), federal and state funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and

Development Center, The Ohio State University and from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements

(ODS) supplemental grant funds."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"NO: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript study the effect of EcN biofilm in Gp pigs with induced nutritional deficiencies and modified gut microbiota. The results are interesting and promising. The manuscript is clear, well described and easy to follow. I just have some minor observations:

Lines 84-87: Please consider to include in this section some information about microparticles and materials studied or proved useful to improve probiotics viability (as explanation of the hypothesis).

Lines 88-100: Besides gut stability, Why a single administration (EcN-biofilm) would be considered enough?

Lines 101-105: In some cases, with the use of probiotics is recommended the use of prebiotics and supplements (to restore gut balance). Explain better the impact of malnutrition in diarrheic diseases and the limitations of the probiotics’ beneficial effects.

Lines 123-125: Why did you decided to use HRV strain Wa instead OSU? Is just because the gut microbiota modification?

Lines 321-323: Although EcN biofilm showed better results, EcN suspention also had good response controlling viral shedding respect to control (and in other parameters). Is the cost-effect good or better in the use of EcN biofilm (production)?

Line 393: more than speculate use other expression… change it by -this would explain- or -this agreed with our hypothesis-

References: Check the references format; in reference 13, the year was missed. Most of the references are old (20% are from 2015-2020)

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246193.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Jan 2021

12.29.2020

Manuscript ID: PONE-D-20-32708

Dear Editor,

We sincerely thank you for the opportunity to re-submit our revised manuscript and the reviewer for the constructive and insightful criticism and the overall encouraging comments. Please find below our point-by-point answers to the reviewer’s queries and modifications/insertions are highlighted in the manuscript.

ED: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

AU: We have reviewed the PLOS ONE guidelines and believe our manuscript meets them.

ED: Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

AU: We have obtained a written consent from parent that is being securely stored.

ED: Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP 1117467), the NIAID,

NIH (R01 A1099451), federal and state funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and

Development Center, The Ohio State University and from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements

(ODS) supplemental grant funds."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"NO: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

AU: Funding information is removed from the manuscript. During the original manuscript submission, we have entered the funding sources; however, we failed to find where Funding statement could be entered. Please enter the following statement into the online submission system:

This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP 1117467), the NIAID, NIH (R01 A1099451), federal and state funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University and from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) supplemental grant funds.

ED: We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.3.

AU: To comply with the PLOS policy we have now submitted all the data previously labeled as ‘not shown’ as supplementary figures and numbered accordingly.

Reviewer # 1 Comments to the Author

RE: Lines 84-87: Please consider to include in this section some information about microparticles and materials studied or proved useful to improve probiotics viability (as explanation of the hypothesis).

AU: We have now added the following information: Navarro and his colleagues (2017) have formulated a new synbiotic formulation that employed porous semi-permeable, biocompatible and biodegradable microspheres (dextranomer microspheres) containing readily diffusible prebiotic cargo. Adherence of the probiotic bacteria to the microsphere has a two-fold effect; it facilitates the more formidable biofilm state of probiotics as well as a creates a directed means to provide a high concentration gradient of prebiotics via diffusion of the microsphere cargo.

Now lines 85-91.

RE: Lines 88-100: Besides gut stability, Why a single administration (EcN-biofilm) would be considered enough?

AU: Biofilms are the native stable state of bacteria on surfaces and provide a more protected state of the resident bacteria. They also allow bacteria to evade innate immune defenses and persist in the gut longer (Tam, Uyen et al., 2006; Wang, Cao et al. 2020). These biofilm features allow maximization of the beneficial effects of probiotics following single administration.

RE: Lines 101-105: In some cases, with the use of probiotics is recommended the use of prebiotics and supplements (to restore gut balance). Explain better the impact of malnutrition in diarrheic diseases and the limitations of the probiotics’ beneficial effects.

AU: Malnutrition increases the risk of diarrheal diseases caused by some, but not all, entero-pathogens. Malnutrition can result in impaired immune defenses that compromise gut integrity, and dybiosis that can influence defense against intestinal pathogens in the malnourished host.

Now lines 108-111.

Probiotics are generally considered safe, however there are some associated risks. These risks are increased if there are chronic medical conditions that weaken the immune system or if there are gut barrier breeches. Possible risks can include: developing an infection, developing resistance to antibiotics, and developing harmful byproducts from the probiotic supplement. Also, in malnourished hosts due to increased intestinal motility, probiotics can be eliminated from the gut faster limiting their beneficial effects.

Now lines 114-119.

RE: Lines 321-323: Although EcN biofilm showed better results, EcN suspension also had good response controlling viral shedding respect to control (and in other parameters). Is the cost-effect good or better in the use of EcN biofilm (production)?

AU: Results suggest that low-cost, stable, and efficient dietary supplementation of EcN coupled with a dextranomer microsphere biofilm can protect against HRV infection and can moderate the symptoms of other gastrointestinal infections and disorders including gastritis and chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Probiotics in the planktonic state need to be taken daily, whereas this biofilm formulation only needs to be taken once which can reduce the cost, despite the extra expense for microsphere formulation.

RE: Lines 123-125: Why did you decided to use HRV strain Wa instead OSU? Is just because the gut microbiota modification?

AU: This is because we were modeling childhood malnutrition-rotavirus infection-probiotic intervention in gnotobiotic pigs transplanted with human infant microbiota and infected with human rotavirus strain (Wa).

RE: Line 393: more than speculate use other expression… change it by -this would explain- or -this agreed with our hypothesis-

AU: Word ‘speculate’ is replaced with ‘this agreed with our hypothesis’ and now line 395.

RE: References: Check the references format; in reference 13, the year was missed. Most of the references are old (20% are from 2015-2020)

AU: Year is added into the reference, now line 503. Older references including the primary references can be highly relevant—our focus was to cite the most relevant references!

Attachment

Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewer (final).docx

Decision Letter 1

Nicholas J Mantis

15 Jan 2021

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 administered as a dextranomar microsphere biofilm enhances immune responses against human rotavirus in a neonatal malnourished pig model colonized with human infant fecal microbiota

PONE-D-20-32708R1

Dear Dr. Vlasova,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nicholas J Mantis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Nicholas J Mantis

25 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-32708R1

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 administered as a dextranomar microsphere biofilm enhances immune responses against human rotavirus in a neonatal malnourished pig model colonized with human infant fecal microbiota

Dear Dr. Vlasova:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nicholas J Mantis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. HRV shedding post-VirHRV challenge in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension, and control pigs.

    (PPTX)

    S2 Fig. Frequencies of apoptotic MNCs (PI-/Annexin-APC-) among total MNCs isolated from blood.

    (PPTX)

    S3 Fig. EcN biofilm altered the frequencies of SWC3a+CD4-CD103+ conventional dendritic cells in blood and intestinal tissues.

    (PPTX)

    S4 Fig. EcN biofilm significantly increased the frequencies of activated B cells in systemic tissues and IgA+ B cells in spleen.

    (PPTX)

    S5 Fig. EcN biofilm significantly increased HRV-specific IgG antibody secreting cells (ASCs) in systemic.

    (PPTX)

    S6 Fig. EcN biofilm increased geometric mean titer HRV specific IgG in serum.

    (PPTX)

    S7 Fig. EcN biofilm increased total Ig concentration in serum.

    (PPTX)

    S8 Fig

    Total (a) and HRV-specific IgG (b) in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension, and control pigs in small intestinal contents (SIC).

    (PPTX)

    S9 Fig

    Relative mRNA levels of MUC2 (a) and PCNA (b) in EcN biofilm, EcN suspension, and control group measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-PCR), normalized to β-actin gene.

    (PPTX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewer (final).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES