ABSTRACT
The CCAAT-binding heme activator protein (HAP) complex, comprising the DNA-binding heterotrimeric complex Hap2/3/5 and transcriptional activation subunit HapX, is a key regulator of iron homeostasis, mitochondrial functions, and pathogenicity in Cryptococcus neoformans, which causes fatal meningoencephalitis. However, its role in the development of human fungal pathogens remains unclear. To elucidate the role of the HAP complex in C. neoformans development, we constructed hap2Δ, hap3Δ, hap5Δ, and hapXΔ mutants and their complemented congenic MATα H99 and MATa YL99a strains. The HAP complex plays a conserved role in iron utilization and stress responses in cells of both mating types. Deletion of any of the HAP complex components markedly enhances filamentation during bisexual mating. However, the Hap2/3/5 complex, but not HapX, is crucial in repressing pheromone production and cell fusion and is thus a critical repressor of sexual differentiation of C. neoformans. Interestingly, deletion of the heterotrimeric complex transcriptionally regulated both positive and negative regulators in the pheromone-responsive Cpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR analysis revealed that the HAP complex physically bound to the CCAAT motif of the CRG1 and GPA2 promoter regions. Notably, the HAP complex was differentially localized depending on the mating type in basal conditions; it was enriched in the nuclei of MATα cells but diffused in the cytoplasm of MATa cells. Interestingly, however, a portion of the HAP complex in both mating types relocalized to the cell membrane during mating. In conclusion, the Hap2/3/5 heterotrimeric complex and HapX play major and minor roles, respectively, in repressing the sexual development of C. neoformans in association with the Cpk1 MAPK pathway.
IMPORTANCE Cryptococcus neoformans isolates are of two mating types: MATα strains, which are predominant, and MATa strains, isolated from the sub-Saharan African region, where cryptococcosis is most abundant and severe. Here, we demonstrated the function of the CCAAT-binding HAP complex (Hap2/3/5/X) as a transcriptional repressor of Cpk1 pathway-related genes in cells of both mating types. Deletion of any HAP complex component markedly enhanced filamentation without affecting normal sporulation. In particular, deletion of the DNA-binding HAP complex components (Hap2/3/5), but not HapX, markedly enhanced pheromone production and cell fusion efficiency, validating its repressive role in the early stage of mating in C. neoformans. The HAP complex regulates the expression of both negative and positive mating regulators and is thus crucial for the regulation of the Cpk1 MAPK pathway during mating. This study provides insights into the complex signaling networks governing the sexual differentiation of C. neoformans.
KEYWORDS: Mating, Hap2/Hap3/Hap5/HapX, C. neoformans, CCAAT-binding HAP complex, Cpk1 MAPK pathway, Cryptococcus neoformans
INTRODUCTION
The CCAAT box is one of the most frequently occurring motifs in eukaryotic promoter regions (1). It is highly conserved and is present in approximately 30% of eukaryotic promoter regions, located approximately 60 to 100 bp upstream of the transcription start sites (2–4). Recognition of the CCAAT box by numerous DNA-binding proteins allows transcriptional activation, which affects gene expression (5, 6). DNA-binding proteins that recognize and bind to the CCAAT box form the CCAAT-binding complex (CBC) and are generally composed of a heterotrimeric complex that is conserved from yeasts to vertebrates (7–9). CBCs are known to regulate various cellular functions, such as primary/secondary metabolism, cell development, and stress responses (9–12). CCAAT motifs are among the regulatory sequences that have low nucleosome occupancy at the functional binding sites, ensuring that the genomic DNA is readily accessible to other transcription factors (13–15). These data demonstrate the role of the CBC in promoter recognition and organization.
In mammals, nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) was the first CBC to be identified and studied (7, 16). NF-Y plays critical and often indispensable roles in gene regulation, respiratory metabolism, cell proliferation, and early embryonic development by binding to the CCAAT box (17–21). NF-Y is composed of three evolutionarily conserved subunits: NF-YA, NF-YB, and NF-YC (22). Crystallographic structural analysis revealed that NF-YB interacts with NF-YC to form a tight heterodimer through a histone fold domain (HFD), which is responsible for creating a platform facilitating the binding and bending of DNA (14, 23). NF-YA consists of two α-helical domains; the N-terminal domain is required for interaction with the NF-YB/NF-YC heterodimer, and the C-terminal domain is involved in recognizing and binding to CCAAT elements. Furthermore, both NF-YA and NF-YC contain the activation domain for this heterotrimeric complex (9, 24). Many transcription factors belonging to the NF-Y family have been identified in eukaryotic species. In yeast species such as Cryptococcus neoformans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata, the NF-Y family has been designated the heme activator protein (HAP) complex (9).
The HAP complex in S. cerevisiae has been identified as a heme-dependent transcriptional activator (25). It is composed of four subunits (Hap2, Hap3, Hap4, and Hap5) and is thus structurally and functionally different in DNA binding and activation from heterotrimeric mammalian NF-Y (26–28). The DNA-binding domain of the HAP complex consists of three essential subunits, Hap2, Hap3, and Hap5 (abbreviated Hap2/3/5), and the activation domain is conferred by Hap4 (27–31). Although Hap2, -3, and -5 are expressed constitutively and present as a heterotrimeric complex, Hap4 must be recruited to trigger transcriptional activation (27). Once Hap2/3/5 binds to the CCAAT motif, the recruitment domain present in Hap5 recruits Hap4 to associate with the heterotrimer. Other domains conferring this Hap4 recruitment within the HAP complex are yet to be discovered (9, 29, 30). Hap4 homologs have only been found in fungi and not in higher organisms, suggesting that these three subunits are sufficient for DNA binding and activation in humans (9, 27, 31).
The HAP complex has been functionally characterized in the basidiomycete C. neoformans, an etiological agent of fungal meningoencephalitis responsible for more than 181,000 deaths annually worldwide (32–34). HapX was previously discovered to play an important role in iron homeostasis as a regulatory subunit of the CBC in C. neoformans. It negatively regulates the expression of genes involved in respiratory and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle functions under low-iron conditions and positively regulates genes involved in iron uptake. Furthermore, deletion of HAP3, HAP5, or HAPX attenuates the growth of C. neoformans on hemin, proving that they contribute to iron utilization from hemin (34). Thus far, most studies on the HAP complex in fungi have focused on its role in iron utilization. However, the role of the HAP complex in fungal development and differentiation remains unclear.
Cryptococcus neoformans has a bipolar mating type system that consists of α and a mating types and can undergo bisexual and unisexual differentiation. In the bisexual mating system, cells of opposite mating types recognize mating pheromones, fuse together with the maintenance of two nuclei (plasmogamy), and form hyphae with fused clamp connections to ensure proper segregation of nuclei. Formed at the tips of the hyphae is the basidium, where two nuclei of opposite mating types undergo nuclear fusion (karyogamy). Then diploid cells undergo meiosis to produce four haploid nuclei and form four chains of basidiospores at the tip of the basidium (35, 36). Despite the well-defined sexual mating process, the majority of naturally isolated C. neoformans strains have the α mating type, suggesting that bisexual mating may not be predominant in nature (37). Nevertheless, bisexual mating appears to be important for understanding the pathogenesis of cryptococcosis, because most of MATa C. neoformans strains have been isolated in the sub-Saharan African region, where cases of cryptococcosis are most abundant and severe (32, 38).
The Cpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is known to modulate unisexual/bisexual mating and dimorphic switching in C. neoformans. Disruption of the Cpk1 MAPK pathway components completely abolishes all the aforementioned processes during mating, confirming its absolute requirement for the pathway in the sexual development of C. neoformans (39–42). Nevertheless, our systematic functional analysis of transcription factors and kinases in C. neoformans revealed that a number of other signaling components are also involved in mating processes (33, 43), suggesting that signaling networks regulating mating are much more complex than originally expected. We previously found Hap2 to be negatively involved in the mating process of C. neoformans by repressing pheromone production (33). However, it remains unclear how the other HAP complex components play a similar role in mating and, if so, how they regulate the mating process in relation to the Cpk1 MAPK pathway. In this study, we demonstrated that the Hap2/3/5 heterotrimeric complex and HapX play major and minor roles, respectively, in repressing the sexual development of C. neoformans by regulating the pheromone-responsive Cpk1 MAPK pathway.
RESULTS
Construction of HAP complex mutants in C. neoformans serotype A MATα and MATa strains.
To elucidate the role of the HAP complex in the sexual differentiation of C. neoformans, genes encoding Hap2, Hap3, Hap5, and HapX were deleted in the MATα H99 strain and its congenic MATa YL99a strain using nourseothricin acetyltransferase (NAT) and neomycin phosphotransferase (NEO) markers, respectively (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). To validate mutant phenotypes and perform localization and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses, we constructed the following complemented strains for all MATα and MATa HAP mutants with mCherry- or GFP-tagged wild-type alleles (GFP encodes green fluorescent protein) (Fig. S2). All fluorescent protein-tagged HAP components appeared to be functional because each tagged allele restored the wild-type phenotype of each mutant, as shown later. First, we examined whether the HAP complex in MATα and MATa cells has differential roles in iron utilization and stress responses (Fig. 1). Previous studies have shown that the growth of MATα hap3Δ, hap5Δ, and hapXΔ mutants on a low-iron medium is retarded but becomes normal upon the addition of the feroxamine or ferric chloride while showing partial restoration of growth on a medium supplemented with hemin as the sole iron source (34). We found that all the HAP mutants constructed in the MATa background strain also displayed similar growth defects on low-iron medium, restoration of near-normal growth in the presence of the ferric chloride, and partial restoration of growth in the presence of hemin (Fig. 1). These defects were restored in the complemented strains (Fig. 1A). We previously reported that the hap2Δ mutant exhibit increased or decreased susceptibility to diverse stress agents (33). In this study, we found that all the HAP complex mutants in MATα and MATa strains exhibit increased susceptibility to a cell wall/membrane stressor such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stressor like dithiothreitol (DTT) (Fig. 1B). These results show that the HAP complex plays a conserved role in iron utilization and stress responses in both mating types of C. neoformans.
Role of HAP complex as a mating repressor.
To elucidate the role of the HAP complex in the sexual reproduction of C. neoformans, each MATα HAP mutant was coincubated with the MATa wild-type YL99a strain (unilateral mating) or HAP mutant (bilateral mating) in V8 medium (Fig. 2A to D). Both unilateral and bilateral mating with the hap2Δ, hap3Δ, hap5Δ, and hapXΔ mutants led to a marked increase in filamentation (Fig. 2A to D). The enhanced filamentation of the HAP mutants led us to question whether sporulation remained intact. Four chains of basidiospores were formed normally at the tips of the basidium in bilateral mating of all HAP mutants, signifying that the HAP complex does not affect the sporulation process in C. neoformans (Fig. 2E). Collectively, these results indicate that all HAP components play conserved roles in repressing mating in C. neoformans.
HAP complex represses pheromone production.
The finding that the deletion of any HAP complex component markedly enhanced filamentation of C. neoformans suggests that the HAP complex may play a repressive role in promoting pheromone production and cell fusion (or both), which represents the early stage of mating. To address this issue, we measured the expression level of the MFα1 pheromone gene during bilateral mating between MATα and MATa wild-type organisms and HAP mutants. Bilateral mating with hap2Δ, hap3Δ, and hap5Δ mutants led to a drastic increase (6- to 15-fold) in pheromone levels 12 to 16 h postmating, whereas mating with hapXΔ mutants yielded only a modest increase (~2-fold) in pheromone production (Fig. 3A). This result strongly suggests that the Hap2/3/5 heterotrimeric complex and HapX play major and minor roles, respectively, in repressing pheromone production during mating.
Once pheromones are released and recognized by cells of the opposing mating type, these cells undergo plasmogamy, also known as cell fusion, in which the protoplasm of two parent cells fuses together without the nuclei fusing, creating a cell with two haploid nuclei in proximity (dikaryon) (44). To address whether increased pheromone production in the HAP mutants resulted in enhanced cell fusion, we measured the cell fusion efficiency by monitoring the NAT NEO double-marked dikaryotic CFU upon mating between NAT-marked MATα and NEO-marked MATa control strains or HAP mutants (Fig. 3B and C). Bilateral mating with hap2Δ, hap3Δ, and hap5Δ mutants led to a significant increase in cell fusion efficiency (1.5- to 3-fold) (Fig. 3C), which reflected an increased pheromone production in the corresponding mutants (Fig. 3A). In contrast, cell fusion efficiency did not increase during bilateral mating between hapXΔ mutants (Fig. 3C), in agreement with only a modest increase in pheromone production during bilateral mating with hapXΔ mutants. Thus, the drastic increase in pheromone production after the deletion of Hap2/3/5 seemed to be the cause of increased cell fusion, leading to robust filamentation. These data represent the direct correlation between mating pheromone production, cell fusion efficiency, and filamentation, reinforcing the fact that the Hap complex acts as a repressor in the early stage of sexual reproduction in C. neoformans.
Role of the HAP complex as a positive and negative regulator of the Cpk1 MAPK pathway.
Pheromone production, cell fusion, and filamentation are all governed by the Cpk1 MAPK pathway in C. neoformans (36, 39–42, 44). Therefore, we hypothesized that the HAP complex may act as a repressor in controlling the expression of Cpk1 MAPK signaling components. To test this possibility, we monitored the expression levels of Cpk1 MAPK signaling components, including STE3 (a pheromone receptor), GPB1 (G-protein β subunit), GPA2 (G-protein α subunit), CRG1 (a regulator of G-protein signaling), STE20 (a p21-activated kinase), STE50 (a scaffold/adaptor protein), STE11 (MAPK kinase kinase [MAPKKK]), STE7 (MAPKK), CPK1 (MAPK), MAT2 (Cpk1-dependent transcription factor), and ZNF2 (master regulator of hyphal growth) during bilateral mating with MATα and MATa wild-type strains against bilateral mating of the HAP complex genes, to discover genes that were differentially regulated by the HAP complex during mating. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed that the expression of GPA2, CRG1, MAT2, ZNF2, and MFα1 was greatly induced during mating, whereas kinase genes such as STE7 and CPK1 were only modestly induced (Fig. 4A). We found that the mating-induced levels of GPA2, CRG1, MAT2, ZNF2, and MFα1 were greater in the bilateral mating of the hap2Δ, hap3Δ, and hap5Δ mutants than in the wild-type and hapXΔ mutant strains (Fig. 4A). The degree of induction of each mating gene was not statistically significant because of the batch-to-batch variation that naturally occurred during the mating experiment. However, the general trends of increase/decrease in the expression levels of these genes were similar for all three biological replicates (Fig. S3).
The finding that the HAP complex affects the expression of both negative mating regulators (e.g., CRG1) and positive mating regulators (e.g., GPA2, MAT2, and ZNF2) proposes the involvement of the HAP complex in balanced regulation of the Cpk1 MAPK pathway during mating. To test this possibility, we constructed hap2Δ crg1Δ and hap2Δ gpa2Δ mutants (Fig. S4) and examined unilateral mating efficiency. Previous studies reported that CRG1 acts as a repressor of filamentation (45) and GPA2 acts as an activator of filamentation (46). The hap2Δ crg1Δ mutant showed even more enhanced filamentous growth than the hap2Δ mutant (Fig. 4B), indicating that the expression of CRG1 was increased in the hap2Δ mutant for the negative feedback regulation of mating. However, the deletion of GPA2 in the hap2Δ mutant led to filamentous growth similar to that of unilateral mating of hap2Δ (Fig. 4B), further supporting that the HAP complex repressed the Gpa2-dependent Cpk1 MAPK pathway.
As the Hap2/3/5 complex affected the expression levels of CRG1 and GPA2 during mating, we examined whether these genes contained a CCAAT-binding motif in their promoter sequences. Our investigation found a CCAAT-binding motif in the promoter regions of both genes (Fig. 4C). To validate whether the HAP complex binds directly to the CCAAT-binding motif of CRG1 and GPA2, we performed ChIP-quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis using the MATα hap2Δ::HAP2-4×FLAG-complemented strain (Fig. S5) and the MATα hapX::NAT HAPX-FLAG-NEO strain constructed by Do et al. (6). ChIP-qPCR analysis revealed that both Hap2-4×FLAG and HapX-FLAG specifically bound to the CCAAT-binding motifs of CRG1 and GPA2, whereas they did not bind to the nonspecific promoter region of TUB1 (Fig. 4D and Fig. S6).
Given the role of the HAP complex in the transcriptional regulation of genes in the Cpk1 MAPK pathway, we also examined whether the expression of the HAP complex itself is regulated during mating. To examine the expression levels of the HAP complex during mating, we performed qRT-PCR at 6 and 12 h following mating (Fig. S7). We found that the HAP complex transcript levels were constitutively expressed but did not vary during mating. Thus, the expression level of the HAP complex did not appear to directly impact the effects of mating.
Changes in cellular localization of the HAP complex during mating.
As the HAP complex appears to play the role of a transcriptional repressor and activator, we addressed whether it is constitutively localized to the nucleus or undergoes translocation between the cytoplasm and nucleus during mating. To address this question, we monitored the cellular localization of each HAP component by establishing bilateral mating between MATα hap2Δ::HAP2-mCherry, hap3Δ::HAP3-mCherry, hap5Δ::HAP5-mCherry, and hapXΔ::HAPX-mCherry strains and the corresponding MATa hap2Δ::HAP2-GFP, hap3Δ::HAP3-GFP, hap5Δ::HAP5-GFP, and hapXΔ::HAPX-GFP strains. In S. cerevisiae, the Hap2, Hap3, and Hap5 subunits are assembled to form a heterotrimeric complex and then translocate to the nucleus via the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of Hap2, and without Hap2, the rest of the HAP complex is unable to localize to the nucleus (29, 47, 48). HapX is recruited to the nucleus by Hap5 and other domains in the HAP complex (9, 28–30). In this study, we found that all HAP complex components in the C. neoformans MATα strain background were localized to the nucleus under nonmating basal conditions (Fig. 5A). Unexpectedly, however, the HAP complex in the MATa strain background was not particularly enriched in the nucleus but appeared to be diffused in organelles in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5B). As shown in the S. cerevisiae HAP complex, nuclear enrichment of Hap3 and HapX in the MATα strain background disappeared when HAP2 was deleted (Fig. 5C), indicating that nuclear localization of the Hap2/3/5 complex depends on the NLS of Hap2. In contrast, deletion of HAP5 did not abolish the nuclear enrichment of HapX in the MATα strain background (Fig. 5D), indicating that Hap2, but not Hap5, is required for the nuclear localization of the HAP complex.
Notably, we found that cellular localization of the HAP complex changed dynamically during mating. When MATα hap2Δ::HAP2-mCherry and MATa hap2Δ::HAP2-GFP cells were mated, a portion of the HAP complex appeared to be localized to the cellular membrane. Similar findings were obtained during mating between MATα hap3Δ::HAP3-mCherry and MATa hap3Δ::HAP3-GFP cells, MATα hap5Δ::HAP5-mCherry and MATa hap5Δ::HAP5-GFP cells, and MATα hapXΔ::HAPX-mCherry and MATa hapXΔ::HAPX-GFP cells (Fig. 5E). All these data imply that the HAP complex primarily acts as a transcriptional repressor and is therefore relocalized from the nucleus to the cellular membrane during mating in C. neoformans.
Role of the HAP complex in the localization of pheromone receptors and transporters during mating.
The finding that a portion of the HAP complex can relocalize to the cell membrane during mating prompted us to determine whether the HAP complex affects the membrane localization of mating pheromone transporters (Ste6) and pheromone receptors (Ste3 and Cpr2) during sexual development in C. neoformans. As previously reported, these proteins are localized in the ER during basal conditions, but when the cell is signaled to undergo sexual differentiation, they translocate to the cell membrane (Fig. 6A to C) (49). In the absence of a mating partner, the deletion of HAP2 did not cause a change in the localization of Ste3, Cpr2, and Ste6, and they remained in a punctate form in the ER. In the presence of an opposite mating partner (YL99a or hap2Δ), Ste3-GFP, Ste6-GFP, and Cpr2-GFP were translocated to the cell membrane 2 days following mating. To determine the role of Hap2 in the localization of Ste3, Ste6, and Cpr2 during mating, we deleted HAP2 in genes expressing Ste3-GFP, Ste6-GFP, and Cpr2-GFP. Deletion of HAP2 led to no changes in the localization of pheromone receptors and transporters. Therefore, it can be deduced that the changes conferred on the development of C. neoformans by the HAP complex are not related to the localization of Ste3, Cpr2, or Ste6 (Fig. 6A to C).
DISCUSSION
The role of the HAP complex has been extensively studied in eukaryotic organisms ranging from fungi to humans. As both adapting to varying iron levels and the ability to acquire iron are essential for ensuring survival in the host environment, a majority of studies have focused on the role of the HAP complex in iron utilization in pathogenic microorganisms. Studies have supported that the HAP complex plays a critical role in regulating iron homeostasis and pathogenicity of C. neoformans (34, 50). In this study, we demonstrated that the HAP complex also plays a pivotal role in sexual development of C. neoformans by negatively regulating pheromone production and cell fusion events in a Cpk1 MAPK-dependent manner.
At this point, it remains elusive whether the roles of the HAP complex in sexual development and iron utilization are functionally interconnected in C. neoformans. It was previously reported that a GATA-type iron transcription factor, Cir1, has a positive role in mating of C. neoformans (51), which is in stark contrast to the negative role of the HAP complex in mating. Although the HAP complex and Cir1 play coordinated roles in iron utilization and uptake (6), the role of Cir1 in mating appears to be mainly mediated by regulating genes involved in copper uptake, but not those in iron homeostasis (51). However, it remains unknown whether the HAP complex is also involved in regulation of genes involved in copper uptake. It was recently reported that HapX is not likely to directly control copper regulated genes (6). Furthermore, it was also previously reported that the addition of copper, but not iron, induces sexual reproduction of C. neoformans on defined V8 medium (52), implying that the iron utilization pathway may be independent of the sexual development pathway. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the HAP complex could play an indirect role in copper uptake and metabolism through its role in iron homeostasis. Therefore, the correlation between iron and copper utilization and sexual development with regard to the HAP complex needs to be further studied in the future.
Notably, although the HAP complex plays a conserved role in iron acquisition and utilization as well as sexual development regardless of the mating type, the cellular localization of the HAP complex varies between MATα and MATa cells. Under nonmating basal conditions, the HAP complex was localized in the nuclei of MATα cells, whereas it was distributed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm in MATa cells, indicating that the level of the HAP complex observed in the nuclei of MATa cells may be sufficient for its roles in iron utilization and mating like the nuclear-enriched HAP complex in MATα cells. As the H99 and YL99a strains we used are congenic except the MAT locus (53), the different localization of the HAP complex may be caused by divergent MATα and MATa alleles. The MAT locus in C. neoformans is unusually large (~120 kb) and encompasses more than 20 genes involved in mating, virulence, and cell viability (54). The presence of mating-type-specific alleles for some genes (e.g., STE3α or STE3a and SXI1α or SXI2a) or extensive rearrangement of the genes in the MAT locus may directly or indirectly contribute to the different cellular localization of the HAP complex between MATα and MATa cells. This possibility should be further addressed in future studies.
The key finding of this study is that the HAP complex plays a critical role as a transcriptional repressor in the early stage of sexual development of C. neoformans. Our data showed that Hap2/3/5 and HapX play major and minor roles, respectively, in the process. A possible explanation is that the Hap2/3/5 complex without HapX can still bind to the promoter regions of the mating-associated genes and repress them, although the recruitment of HapX may further stabilize the HAP complex. In Aspergillus fumigatus, HapB (an ortholog of Hap2) is the actual CCAAT box-binding subunit, and HapC and HapE (Hap3 and Hap5 orthologs, respectively) subunits recruit and assemble the HapX transcriptional activator with the HapB/C/E heterotrimeric complex (9, 30). Supporting this, our data also showed that Hap2 is the critical DNA binding subunit for the HAP complex in C. neoformans, because the deletion of HAP2 eliminated the nuclear enrichment of Hap3 and HapX. However, it remains unclear whether Hap5 is necessary for the recruitment of HapX in C. neoformans, because deletion of HAP5 did not affect the nuclear enrichment of HapX. However, it is still possible that a lack of HapX might decrease the nuclear translocation, DNA-binding activity, and/or stability of the HAP complex in C. neoformans. Otherwise, it is also possible that the transcriptional activator domain of the HapX subunit may independently contribute to the mating repression process. These possibilities should be addressed in future studies.
The role of the HAP complex in fungal development is not confined to C. neoformans. In A. fumigatus, the HAP complex is composed of HapB, HapC, HapE, and HapX (11, 47, 48, 55). Similar to our findings in C. neoformans, deletion of the HAP complex leads to the repression of conidiation in liquid submerged cultures, causing asexual conidiation (56). However, this phenomenon was not observed when the experiment was performed on solid medium—on solid medium, the HAP complex mutants displayed fewer conidia than the wild type. Therefore, it is yet to be determined whether the HAP complex is affected by different culture conditions and whether it plays a conserved role in fungal development.
Here, we provide experimental evidence showing that the HAP complex regulates the sexual differentiation of C. neoformans mainly through the pheromone-responsive Cpk1 MAPK pathway. First, deletion of Hap2/3/5 components displayed an increase in the expression levels of GPA2, CRG1, MAT2, ZNF2, and MFα1, which are all key signaling components of the Cpk1 MAPK pathway, during the bilateral mating of Hap2/3/5 mutants as opposed to wild-type mating, clearly supporting the repressive role of the HAP complex in sexual differentiation in C. neoformans. Second, ChIP-qPCR analysis clearly showed that the HAP complex could directly bind to the CCAAT motif-containing promoter regions of CRG1 and GPA2. Such binding of the HAP complex to the promoters of development-related genes has been previously shown in other fungi. In A. fumigatus, hapB deletion leads to upregulation of key conidiation regulatory genes, including brlA, a key regulator of conidiation. It was also reported that the A. fumigatus HAP complex binds to the CCAAT motif in the promoter region of brlA to repress its expression (56). Therefore, although the general ability of the HAP complex to bind to other CCAAT motifs of signaling components in the pheromone-responsive MAPK pathway during the developmental cycle remains to be elucidated, this phenomenon may be prevalent in other fungal species.
Another notable finding of this study was that the HAP complex underwent dynamic changes in its cellular localization during mating, and a portion of the HAP complex in the nucleus and cytoplasm appeared to translocate to the cell membrane during mating. Similarly, pheromone receptors (Ste3 and Cpr2) and pheromone transporters (Ste6) also relocalize to the cell membrane during sexual development in C. neoformans (49). However, we found that the deletion of HAP2 did not affect cellular relocalization, indicating that the two events were unrelated. Membrane localization of the HAP complex has not been reported for other fungi or humans. A similar case was reported for plant cells, where the NF-YC subunit was localized in both the nucleus and the cytoplasmic membrane and possibly in the cell wall (57). However, Li et al. did not investigate the impact of the membrane/cell wall localization of the NF-Y complex on its function. In this study, we could not find any motifs or domains that could facilitate membrane localization of the cryptococcal HAP complex. We speculate that the membrane localization of the HAP complex may contribute to its reduced nuclear localization, which subsequently enhances the mating process in C. neoformans.
In conclusion, the HAP complex plays a critical role in the developmental cycle of C. neoformans by primarily acting as a transcriptional repressor during mating through its association with the Cpk1 MAPK pathway. Despite the phenotypic similarities of this complex in both MATα and MATa, differences in the localization of the HAP complex exist, which could highlight the differences between the two mating types. Given these findings, this study may prove helpful in elucidating the signaling components associated with the developmental cycle of C. neoformans, as well as unveiling the complexity underlying fungal mating types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Construction of Cryptococcus neoformans HAP complex mutants and complementation strains.
HAP2, HAP3, HAP5, and HAPX were deleted in the C. neoformans serotype A MATα wild-type strain (H99) and MATa strain (YL99a) backgrounds through homologous recombination using gene disruption cassettes containing the nourseothricin resistance marker (NAT) and neomycin resistance marker (NEO), respectively. Mutants were constructed as previously described (58). The correct genotype of each screened transformant was verified using Southern blot analysis with a gene-specific probe (Fig. S1). The corresponding complemented strains, in which each wild-type allele was reintegrated into its native locus, were constructed using the Gibson assembly method. First, each full-length gene fragment was amplified via Phusion PCR using genomic DNA of the H99 or YL99a strain as the template. The amplified fragments of the MATα HAP genes were cloned into the pNEO_mCherry plasmid, and the amplified fragments of the MATa HAP genes were cloned into the pHYG_GFP plasmid. After confirmation of the integration of the target genes into their respective plasmids through enzyme digestion and sequencing, targeted reintegration into the native locus was conducted. Plasmids containing the HAP genes were linearized by enzyme digestion (Fig. S2) and introduced into each mutant strain via biolistic transformation. The correct genotype for the complemented strain was confirmed using diagnostic PCR.
Immunoblotting and construction of the Hap2-4×FLAG strain.
The hap2Δ::HAP2-4×FLAG strain was constructed using the Gibson assembly method. The HAP2 gene in MATα was amplified using the primers listed in Table S2 and was integrated into the pNEO_4×FLAG plasmid. Integration was confirmed via enzymatic digestion and sequencing. Plasmid was linearized with the enzyme AatII for biolistic transformation into the hap2Δ (YSB1104) mutant, and reintegration into its native locus was confirmed using diagnostic PCR. To confirm the constructed strain using immunoblotting, the Hap2-4×FLAG strain was incubated in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) broth overnight at 30°C. The overnight culture was inoculated into 50 mL of fresh YPD broth and incubated at 30°C until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached approximately 0.8. Immunoblotting with anti-FLAG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) was conducted as described previously (59).
Mating assay.
To examine unilateral and bilateral mating efficiencies, each HAP complex mutant constructed in the MATα H99 strain and MATa YL99a background were separately cultured in YPD medium for 16 h at 30°C and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For unilateral mating, HAP mutant cells of one mating type were mixed at equal concentrations (107 cells/ml) with wild-type cells of the opposite mating type. For bilateral mating, HAP mutant cells of one mating type were mixed at equal concentrations (107 cells/ml) with the same HAP mutant of the opposite mating type. These mixtures were spotted onto V8 mating medium (pH 5) or Murashige and Skoog medium (pH 5.8) and incubated at 25°C in the dark for 7 to 14 days. Filamentous growth and sporulation were observed and photographed using a differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with a SPOT Insight digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.).
Cell fusion assay.
To examine the cell fusion efficiency, NAT-marked MATα HAP mutants and NEO-marked MATa HAP mutants were cultured in YPD medium for 16 h at 30°C, washed twice with PBS, mixed at equal concentrations (107 cells/ml), spotted onto V8 mating medium, and incubated for 24 h at 25°C in the dark. The cells were scraped, resuspended, and 100-fold diluted in distilled water (dH2O), and 200 μL of each sample was spread onto YPD medium containing both nourseothricin (100 μg/mL) and neomycin (50 μg/mL) to ensure that only the cells that had undergone cell fusion could grow. The plates were incubated at 25°C in the dark for 4 to 5 days. The NAT/NEO-positive dikaryotic cells were counted using an automated bacterial colony counter (aCOLyte 3; Synbiosis Ltd., UK).
Expression analysis using Northern blotting and qRT-PCR.
To monitor the expression levels of the genes involved in mating, we performed Northern blot analysis and qRT-PCR. To extract RNA, the H99, YL99a, and mutant strains were incubated in liquid YPD medium for 16 h at 30°C. The cell culture was washed three times with PBS and prepared for unilateral and bilateral mating using a mixture of equal cell concentrations (108 cells/ml). The cells were spread onto V8 medium for 6 and 12 h, scraped, and lyophilized overnight. For the zero-time control, the MATα and MATa cells were freshly mixed and collected, washed, and lyophilized overnight. Total RNA was extracted from each sample using a commercial RNA extraction kit (easy-BLUE; iNtRON Biotechnology, South Korea), and cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase (RTase) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). To monitor gene expression levels, we performed qRT-PCR with gene-specific primer pairs using a CFX96 Touch real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). For Northern blotting analysis, the membrane was hybridized using a radioactively labeled probe generated from gene-specific primers, as previously described (60).
ChIP-qPCR.
Hap2-4×FLAG or HapX-FLAG strains were grown in 50 ml of YPD broth overnight at 30°C and subcultured to an OD600 of 0.8 at 30°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed twice with PBS. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as previously described (61). To monitor the binding of Hap2 and HapX to the CRG1 and GPA2 promoters, we employed qRT-PCR. Whole-cell extracts (WCE) and IP samples were used as templates for qRT-PCR. Primers were designed to encompass the regions of CRG1 and GPA2, where Hap2 and HapX were assumed to bind owing to their respective consensus sequences.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Won Hee Jung and Eunsoo Do from Chung-Ang University for providing the strains used in this study.
This work was supported by grants (2021M3A9I4021434 and 2021R1A2B5B03086596) from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT).
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants (2021M3A9I4021434 and 2021R1A2B5B03086596) from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT).
Contributor Information
Yong-Sun Bahn, Email: ysbahn@yonsei.ac.kr.
Aaron P. Mitchell, University of Georgia
REFERENCES
- 1.Bucher P. 1990. Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences. J Mol Biol 212:563–578. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90223-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maity SN, de Crombrugghe B. 1998. Role of the CCAAT-binding protein CBF/NF-Y in transcription. Trends Biochem Sci 23:174–178. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01201-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mantovani R. 1998. A survey of 178 NF-Y binding CCAAT boxes. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1135–1143. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.5.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dolfini D, Zambelli F, Pavesi G, Mantovani R. 2009. A perspective of promoter architecture from the CCAAT box. Cell Cycle 8:4127–4137. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.24.10240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Osada S, Yamamoto H, Nishihara T, Imagawa M. 1996. DNA binding specificity of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein transcription factor family. J Biol Chem 271:3891–3896. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Do E, Cho YJ, Kim D, Kronstad JW, Jung WH. 2020. A transcriptional regulatory map of iron homeostasis reveals a new control circuit for capsule formation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics 215:1171–1189. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dorn A, Bollekens J, Staub A, Benoist C, Mathis D. 1987. A multiplicity of CCAAT box-binding proteins. Cell 50:863–872. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90513-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chodosh LA, Baldwin AS, Carthew RW, Sharp PA. 1988. Human CCAAT-binding proteins have heterologous subunits. Cell 53:11–24. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90483-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mao Y, Chen C. 2019. The HAP complex in yeasts: structure, assembly mode, and gene regulation. Front Microbiol 10:1645. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim JE, Nam H, Park J, Choi GJ, Lee YW, Son H. 2020. Characterization of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor complex in the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Sci Rep 10:4898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61885-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hortschansky P, Haas H, Huber EM, Groll M, Brakhage AA. 2017. The CCAAT-binding complex (CBC) in Aspergillus species. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1860:560–570. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maity SN. 2017. NF-Y (CBF) regulation in specific cell types and mouse models. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1860:598–603. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caretti G, Motta MC, Mantovani R. 1999. NF-Y associates with H3-H4 tetramers and octamers by multiple mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 19:8591–8603. doi: 10.1128/MCB.19.12.8591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huber EM, Scharf DH, Hortschansky P, Groll M, Brakhage AA. 2012. DNA minor groove sensing and widening by the CCAAT-binding complex. Structure 20:1757–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thastrom A, Field Y, Moore IK, Wang JP, Widom J. 2006. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442:772–778. doi: 10.1038/nature04979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zorbas H, Rein T, Krause A, Hoffmann K, Winnacker EL. 1992. Nuclear factor I (NF I) binds to an NF I-type site but not to the CCAAT site in the human alpha-globin gene promoter. J Biol Chem 267:8478–8484. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42470-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ly LL, Yoshida H, Yamaguchi M. 2013. Nuclear transcription factor Y and its roles in cellular processes related to human disease. Am J Cancer Res 3:339–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oldfield AJ, Henriques T, Kumar D, Burkholder AB, Cinghu S, Paulet D, Bennett BD, Yang P, Scruggs BS, Lavender CA, Rivals E, Adelman K, Jothi R. 2019. NF-Y controls fidelity of transcription initiation at gene promoters through maintenance of the nucleosome-depleted region. Nat Commun 10:3072. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10905-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hu Q, Lu JF, Luo R, Sen S, Maity SN. 2006. Inhibition of CBF/NF-Y mediated transcription activation arrests cells at G2/M phase and suppresses expression of genes activated at G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res 34:6272–6285. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kao CY, Tanimoto A, Arima N, Sasaguri Y, Padmanabhan R. 1999. Transactivation of the human cdc2 promoter by adenovirus E1A. J Biol Chem 274:23043–23051. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Benatti P, Belluti S, Miotto B, Neusiedler J, Dolfini D, Drac M, Basile V, Schwob E, Mantovani R, Blow JJ, Imbriano C. 2016. Direct non transcriptional role of NF-Y in DNA replication. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863:673–685. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mantovani R. 1999. The molecular biology of the CCAAT-binding factor NF-Y. Gene 239:15–27. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00368-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nardini M, Gnesutta N, Donati G, Gatta R, Forni C, Fossati A, Vonrhein C, Moras D, Romier C, Bolognesi M, Mantovani R. 2013. Sequence-specific transcription factor NF-Y displays histone-like DNA binding and H2B-like ubiquitination. Cell 152:132–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Olesen JT, Guarente L. 1990. The HAP2 subunit of yeast CCAAT transcriptional activator contains adjacent domains for subunit association and DNA recognition: model for the HAP2/3/4 complex. Genes Dev 4:1714–1729. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guarente L, Lalonde B, Gifford P, Alani E. 1984. Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae. Cell 36:503–511. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90243-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hahn S, Guarente L. 1988. Yeast HAP2 and HAP3: transcriptional activators in a heteromeric complex. Science 240:317–321. doi: 10.1126/science.2832951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Forsburg SL, Guarente L. 1989. Identification and characterization of HAP4: a third component of the CCAAT-bound HAP2/HAP3 heteromer. Genes Dev 3:1166–1178. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.8.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McNabb DS, Xing Y, Guarente L. 1995. Cloning of yeast HAP5: a novel subunit of a heterotrimeric complex required for CCAAT binding. Genes Dev 9:47–58. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McNabb DS, Pinto I. 2005. Assembly of the Hap2p/Hap3p/Hap4p/Hap5p-DNA complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4:1829–1839. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.11.1829-1839.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McNabb DS, Tseng KA, Guarente L. 1997. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hap5p homolog from fission yeast reveals two conserved domains that are essential for assembly of heterotetrameric CCAAT-binding factor. Mol Cell Biol 17:7008–7018. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.12.7008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bolotin-Fukuhara M. 2017. Thirty years of the HAP2/3/4/5 complex. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1860:543–559. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP, Chiller TM, Denning DW, Loyse A, Boulware DR. 2017. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 17:873–881. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30243-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jung KW, Yang DH, Maeng S, Lee KT, So YS, Hong J, Choi J, Byun HJ, Kim H, Bang S, Song MH, Lee JW, Kim MS, Kim SY, Ji JH, Park G, Kwon H, Cha S, Meyers GL, Wang LL, Jang J, Janbon G, Adedoyin G, Kim T, Averette AK, Heitman J, Cheong E, Lee YH, Lee YW, Bahn YS. 2015. Systematic functional profiling of transcription factor networks in Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat Commun 6:6757. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jung WH, Saikia S, Hu G, Wang J, Fung CK, D'Souza C, White R, Kronstad JW. 2010. HapX positively and negatively regulates the transcriptional response to iron deprivation in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001209. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hull CM, Davidson RC, Heitman J. 2002. Cell identity and sexual development in Cryptococcus neoformans are controlled by the mating-type-specific homeodomain protein Sxi1α. Genes Dev 16:3046–3060. doi: 10.1101/gad.1041402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhao Y, Lin J, Fan Y, Lin X. 2019. Life cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:17–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-120210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lengeler KB, Wang P, Cox GM, Perfect JR, Heitman J. 2000. Identification of the MATa mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans reveals a serotype A MATa strain thought to have been extinct. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14455–14460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Litvintseva AP, Marra RE, Nielsen K, Heitman J, Vilgalys R, Mitchell TG. 2003. Evidence of sexual recombination among Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates in sub-Saharan Africa. Eukaryot Cell 2:1162–1168. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.6.1162-1168.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Davidson RC, Nichols CB, Cox GM, Perfect JR, Heitman J. 2003. A MAP kinase cascade composed of cell type specific and non-specific elements controls mating and differentiation of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 49:469–485. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang P, Nichols CB, Lengeler KB, Cardenas ME, Cox GM, Perfect JR, Heitman J. 2002. Mating-type-specific and nonspecific PAK kinases play shared and divergent roles in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell 1:257–272. doi: 10.1128/EC.1.2.257-272.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Clarke DL, Woodlee GL, McClelland CM, Seymour TS, Wickes BL. 2001. The Cryptococcus neoformans STE11α gene is similar to other fungal mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) genes but is mating type specific. Mol Microbiol 40:200–213. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lin X, Jackson JC, Feretzaki M, Xue C, Heitman J. 2010. Transcription factors Mat2 and Znf2 operate cellular circuits orchestrating opposite- and same-sex mating in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Genet 6:e1000953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lee KT, So YS, Yang DH, Jung KW, Choi J, Lee DG, Kwon H, Jang J, Wang LL, Cha S, Meyers GL, Jeong E, Jin JH, Lee Y, Hong J, Bang S, Ji JH, Park G, Byun HJ, Park SW, Park YM, Adedoyin G, Kim T, Averette AF, Choi JS, Heitman J, Cheong E, Lee YH, Bahn YS. 2016. Systematic functional analysis of kinases in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat Commun 7:12766. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kozubowski L, Heitman J. 2012. Profiling a killer, the development of Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:78–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00286.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nielsen K, Cox GM, Wang P, Toffaletti DL, Perfect JR, Heitman J. 2003. Sexual cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and virulence of congenic a and alpha isolates. Infect Immun 71:4831–4841. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.9.4831-4841.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hsueh YP, Xue C, Heitman J. 2007. G protein signaling governing cell fate decisions involves opposing Gα subunits in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Biol Cell 18:3237–3249. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tuncher A, Sprote P, Gehrke A, Brakhage AA. 2005. The CCAAT-binding complex of eukaryotes: evolution of a second NLS in the HapB subunit of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans despite functional conservation at the molecular level between yeast, A.nidulans and human. J Mol Biol 352:517–533. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Steidl S, Tuncher A, Goda H, Guder C, Papadopoulou N, Kobayashi T, Tsukagoshi N, Kato M, Brakhage AA. 2004. A single subunit of a heterotrimeric CCAAT-binding complex carries a nuclear localization signal: piggy back transport of the pre-assembled complex to the nucleus. J Mol Biol 342:515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jung KW, So YS, Bahn YS. 2016. Unique roles of the unfolded protein response pathway in fungal development and differentiation. Sci Rep 6:33413. doi: 10.1038/srep33413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hortschansky P, Eisendle M, Al-Abdallah Q, Schmidt AD, Bergmann S, Thon M, Kniemeyer O, Abt B, Seeber B, Werner ER, Kato M, Brakhage AA, Haas H. 2007. Interaction of HapX with the CCAAT-binding complex—a novel mechanism of gene regulation by iron. EMBO J 26:3157–3168. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jung WH, Kronstad JW. 2011. The iron-responsive, GATA-type transcription factor Cir1 influences mating in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Cells 31:73–77. doi: 10.1007/s10059-011-0011-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kent CR, Ortiz-Bermudez P, Giles SS, Hull CM. 2008. Formulation of a defined V8 medium for induction of sexual development of Cryptococcus neoformans. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6248–6253. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00970-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Semighini CP, Averette AF, Perfect JR, Heitman J. 2011. Deletion of Cryptococcus neoformans AIF ortholog promotes chromosome aneuploidy and fluconazole-resistance in a metacaspase-independent manner. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002364. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sun S, Coelho MA, David-Palma M, Priest SJ, Heitman J. 2019. The evolution of sexual reproduction and the mating-type locus: links to pathogenesis of Cryptococcus human pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Genet 53:417–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Furukawa T, Scheven MT, Misslinger M, Zhao C, Hoefgen S, Gsaller F, Lau J, Jochl C, Donaldson I, Valiante V, Brakhage AA, Bromley MJ, Haas H, Hortschansky P. 2020. The fungal CCAAT-binding complex and HapX display highly variable but evolutionary conserved synergetic promoter-specific DNA recognition. Nucleic Acids Res 48:3567–3590. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ren Y, Zhang C, Chen Z, Lu L. 2021. The heterotrimeric transcription factor CCAAT-binding complex and Ca2+-CrzA signaling reversely regulate the transition between fungal hyphal growth and asexual reproduction. mBio 12:e03007-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03007-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li S, Zhang N, Zhu X, Ma R, Liu S, Wang X, Yang J, Si H. 2021. Genome-wide analysis of NF-Y genes in potato and functional identification of StNF-YC9 in drought tolerance. Front Plant Sci 12:749688. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.749688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jung KW, Lee KT, So YS, Bahn YS. 2018. Genetic manipulation of Cryptococcus neoformans. Curr Protoc Microbiol 50:e59. doi: 10.1002/cpmc.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.So YS, Yang DH, Jung KW, Huh WK, Bahn YS. 2017. Molecular characterization of adenylyl cyclase complex proteins using versatile protein-tagging plasmid systems in Cryptococcus neoformans. J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:357–364. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1609.09036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jung KW, Kim SY, Okagaki LH, Nielsen K, Bahn YS. 2011. Ste50 adaptor protein governs sexual differentiation of Cryptococcus neoformans via the pheromone-response MAPK signaling pathway. Fungal Genet Biol 48:154–165. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Garcia-Santamarina S, Festa RA, Smith AD, Yu CH, Probst C, Ding C, Homer CM, Yin J, Noonan JP, Madhani H, Perfect JR, Thiele DJ. 2018. Genome-wide analysis of the regulation of Cu metabolism in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 108:473–494. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.