Abstract
Background
Sporozoites (SPZ), the infective form of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, can be inoculated into the human host skin by Anopheline mosquitoes. These SPZ migrate at approximately 1 µm/s to find a blood vessel and travel to the liver where they infect hepatocytes and multiply. In the skin they are still low in number (50–100 SPZ) and vulnerable to immune attack by antibodies and skin macrophages. This is why whole SPZ and SPZ proteins are used as the basis for most malaria vaccines currently deployed and undergoing late clinical testing. Mosquitoes typically inoculate SPZ into a human host between 14 and 25 days after their previous infective blood meal. However, it is unknown whether residing time within the mosquito affects SPZ condition, infectivity or immunogenicity. This study aimed to unravel how the age of P. falciparum SPZ in salivary glands (14, 17, or 20 days post blood meal) affects their infectivity and the ensuing immune responses.
Methods
SPZ numbers, viability by live/dead staining, motility using dedicated sporozoite motility orienting and organizing tool software (SMOOT), and infectivity of HC-04.j7 liver cells at 14, 17 and 20 days after mosquito feeding have been investigated. In vitro co-culture assays with SPZ stimulated monocyte-derived macrophages (MoMɸ) and CD8+ T-cells, analysed by flow cytometry, were used to investigate immune responses.
Results
SPZ age did not result in different SPZ numbers or viability. However, a markedly different motility pattern, whereby motility decreased from 89% at day 14 to 80% at day 17 and 71% at day 20 was observed (p ≤ 0.0001). Similarly, infectivity of day 20 SPZ dropped to ~ 50% compared with day 14 SPZ (p = 0.004). MoMɸ were better able to take up day 14 SPZ than day 20 SPZ (from 7.6% to 4.1%, p = 0.03) and displayed an increased expression of pro-inflammatory CD80, IL-6 (p = 0.005), regulatory markers PDL1 (p = 0.02), IL-10 (p = 0.009) and cytokines upon phagocytosis of younger SPZ. Interestingly, co-culture of these cells with CD8+ T-cells revealed a decreased expression of activation marker CD137 and cytokine IFNγ compared to their day 20 counterparts. These findings suggest that older (day 17–20) P. falciparum SPZ are less infectious and have decreased immune regulatory potential.
Conclusion
Overall, this data is a first step in enhancing the understanding of how mosquito residing time affects P. falciparum SPZ and could impact the understanding of the P. falciparum infectious reservoir and the potency of whole SPZ vaccines.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-024-04946-7.
Keywords: Malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, Sporozoites, Motility, Immunogenicity
Background
Novel vaccines and drugs are urgently needed to alleviate the burden of disease by malaria and reverse the recent resurgence of cases [1–3]. Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (SPZ), the infective form of malaria, are considered a key target for malaria vaccines and antibodies [4–6]. The relatively low number of SPZ and the fact that these initially remain extracellular in the human host makes them a vulnerable target. SPZ reside principally in the salivary gland of Anopheles mosquitoes [7, 8], where they appear 10–14 days post mosquito infected blood meal following sporulation of oocyst in the mosquito midgut wall [7, 8]. Within the salivary gland, SPZ change their infective and metabolic state [9, 10], causing a reduction in the numbers of SPZ per mosquito of about 90% over 4 weeks, with the steepest decline occurring at 25 days post blood meal [11]. In nature, Anopheles mosquitoes are thought to survive 10–20 days [12, 13]. A better understanding of the number and infectivity of SPZ in this timeframe may thus help to define the infectious reservoir of SPZ within mosquitoes and may also aid to improve vaccines [14].
Infectivity of SPZ is defined by their ability to actively migrate to and infect liver cells. A relation between motility and infectivity is shown by SPZ surface proteins circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (TRAP) which are both involved during motility and infectivity [15, 16]. On their journey to the liver, SPZ may encounter human immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells which can present SPZ antigens and activate CD8+ T-cells [17–19]. These primed CD8+ T-cells migrate to the liver and are required and capable of recognizing and eliminating infected hepatocytes [19–21]. A dose-dependent increase of CD8+ T-cells has been shown in volunteers immunised with SPZ which are attenuated to avoid pathology [22]. These attenuated whole SPZ vaccines are currently undergoing late-stage clinical testing and rely on their preserved metabolic activity which enables them to infect liver cells. To further improve the immunogenicity and efficacy of these vaccines, a better understanding of the infectivity of SPZ at different timepoints after blood meal and ensuing host immune responses is needed.
In summary, previous studies have shown that the age of the SPZ inside the mosquito salivary gland may change their number and infectivity [8–13]. However, little is known about the changes in biology and immunogenicity of aging SPZ at early timepoints post blood meal which seem to be most relevant to the infectious reservoir in endemic areas. This study thus sets out to investigate the changes in SPZ as they age from day 14 to day 20 post blood meal. Alteration in motility, viability, metabolism, infectivity and immune response in vitro was analysed (Fig. 1).
Methods
Parasite culture
Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were infected with P. falciparum wild-type NF54 [23–25] infected blood through membrane feeding as previously described [26]. Salivary glands of infected and uninfected mosquitoes were dissected 14, 17 or 20 days post blood meal in RPMI + 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), and homogenized to extract SPZ from the glands [27].
Sporozoite numbers and viability assessment
SPZ were counted in a Bürker chamber using phase-contrast. After counting, an estimated 15,000 SPZ/well were stained for 15 min (min) at room temperature with propidium iodide at a 1:25 dilution in RPMI + 10% FCS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The plates were centrifuged for 3 min at 300 × g and assessed by confocal microscopy using Dragonfly 500 spinning disk (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar). Live and dead SPZ were counted using the Imaris software (version 9.8, Oxford).
Sporozoite gliding assay
Gliding assays were performed as previously described [28–30]. Briefly, 96 wells optical glass bottom plates were coated with 10 µg/mL monoclonal anti circumsporozoite protein (anti-CSP) 3SP2 (courtesy of Dr. M. McCall Radboud UMC) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated overnight at room temperature (RT). After washing, 15,000 SPZ in 100 µl RPMI + 10% FCS were added to each well. Plates were centrifuged for 3 min at 1200 rpm RT and incubated for one hour at 37 °C + 5% CO2 after which SPZ were fixed by 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min at RT. Subsequently, plates were blocked with 10% FCS/PBS for 15 min at RT, stained with 10 µg/mL primary monoclonal anti-CSP 3SP2 in PBS for 45 min at RT, and stained with secondary antibody goat anti-mouse AF488 (Invitrogen) 1:500 in PBS and incubated for 45 min in the dark at RT. Between each step the wells were gently washed 3 times with PBS. Each well was measured by confocal microscopy (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar). Each condition was performed in duplicate. A total number of 10 pictures of each well was analysed and the tracks were counted by two independent readers.
Motility assessment by automated video analyses
Motility of SPZ were analysed using the custom-made SMOOT software, as previously described [30, 31]. Briefly, SPZ were diluted to 15.000 spz/100 µl RPMI + 10% FCS and 100 µL/well was added to 96 wells optical glass bottom plate. 200 nm Cy5-methyl-methyl (Cy5M2) was used for staining of the SPZ as described previously [30, 31]. The plate was centrifuged for 3 min at 1200 rpm RT. Directly after centrifugation 200 frames were measured by Leica TCS SP5 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar) at 28 °C. Each condition was measured in triplicate. Kinematic parameters were extracted using SMOOT software.
SPZ real-time cell metabolic analyses
The wells of a XFe96 well Seahorse plate (Agilent) were coated with 10 µg/mL 2A10 aCSP (BEI resources) in PBS and incubated over night at room temperature. The following day, SPZ were obtained from salivary glands in XF medium RPMI (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA, R6504) supplemented with 10 mM glucose (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA, G8644) 5% FCS and 1% l-glutamine (20 µM). The anti-CSP coated wells were washed with PBS. To each well 180,000 SPZ of 14 days or 20 days post blood meal were added. Before measuring, the plate was spun down for 3 min at 1200 rpm and rested for 15–30 min at 37 °C non-CO2. Injected compounds were diluted in XF media to a concentration of 2 μM for oligomycin (Cayman, 11342), 1.5 μM for FCCP (Sigma, C2920), 0.75 μM for rotenone (Sigma, 557368) and 0.75 μM for antimycin (Sigma, A8674). Each condition was measured in quadruple. As negative control salivary glands extract (SGE) of comparable number of uninfected mosquitoes were measured and subtracted using the manufacturer’s Wave Seahorse software.
Hepatocyte infection assay
A 96 wells optical glass bottom plate was coated with 50 µg/mL collagen type I (Corning, USA) in PBS for 30 min at RT. The wells were gently washed with PBS and 40.000 HC-04.j7 cells per well (kindly provided by Dr. Rhoel Dinglasan) were plated in 200 µl DMEM + 5% FCS supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin and incubated overnight at 37 °C + 5% CO2. The following day, the medium was refreshed with 100 µl DMEM + 5% FCS supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 15 mM glucose (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.01 mg/mL insulin, 5.5 µg/mL transferrin and 0.67 µg/mL selenium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). SPZ were extracted from salivary glands as previously described and diluted to 60,000 SPZ/100 µl DMEM + 5% FCS supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 15 mM glucose (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.01 mg/mL insulin, 5.5 µg/mL transferrin and 0.67 µg/mL selenium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Heat-killed SPZ, killed by incubation at 100 °C for 30 min, were used as a negative control. Medium was removed from the HC-04.j7 cells and 100 µl SPZ/heat-killed SPZ/SGE from 14, 17 or 20 days post blood meal were added. The plate was centrifuged for 3 min at 1200 rpm and incubated at 37 °C + 5% CO2. At day 2 post infection (pi) the medium was refreshed with 100 µl 37 °C warm DMEM + 5% FCS supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 15 mM glucose (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 0.01 mg/mL insulin, 5.5 µg/mL transferrin and 0.67 µg/mL selenium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). At day 3 pi, the cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in PBS for 15 min at RT. After the permeabilization with 0.5% Triton (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in PBS for 20 min the cells were washed and blocked with 10% FCS in PBS for 30 min, and stained with primary antibodies HSP70 1:500 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and GAPDH 1:1000 (The European malaria reagent repository, Edinburgh) in PBS overnight at 4 °C. The following day the cells were washed 3 times with PBS and stained with secondary antibodies anti-rabbit AF594 (Invitrogen) 1:500 and anti-mouse AF488 (Invitrogen) 1:500 in PBS for 1 h in the dark. The nucleus of the cells was stained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) 1:200 for 30 min in the dark. The cells were washed 3 times and 100 µl PBS was added to each well. The wells were analysed by ImageXpress confocal (Molecular Devices, LLC, San Jose USA). The HSP70 and GAPDH positive cells were counted by high-content image acquisition and analysis software MetaXpress (Molecular Devices, LLC, San Jose USA).
In addition, infectivity of HC-04.j7 was assessed by qPCR. At 72 h pi the cells were washed twice with PBS, and 100 µl RLT buffer (Qiagen) was added. The cells were lysed within 20 min and stored at − 80 °C. To assess SPZ infection by PCR, the 18S and EXP1 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) levels were determined. RNA was isolated from the cell cultures using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and cDNA was generated using random hexamer primers (Promega) and Superscript™ III (Thermo Fisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification reactions of each cDNA sample were performed in PCR plates (hard-shell PCR plate; Bio-Rad), in a volume of 10 μl containing 5 μl PCR buffer (GoTaq qPCR master mix; Promega), 1 μl RNase-free milliQ water, 2 μl primer mix (for 18S: forward primer: Plasmo Plu3F 5ʹ-GCTCTTTCTTGATTTCTTGGATG-3ʹ (0.2 µM; Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.); reverse primer: Plasmo Plu3R 5ʹ- AGCAGGTTAAGATCTCGTTCG-3ʹ [0.2 µM; Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. and for EXP1 forward primer: 5ʹ-GCTAACCCAGATGCTGATTCTG-3ʹ (0.2 µM; Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.) and reverse primer: 5ʹ-GTGTTCAGTGCCACTTACGAGG-3ʹ (0.2 µM; Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.)] and 2 μl of the cDNA sample. Amplification was performed 10 min at 95 °C followed by 50 cycles of 10 s at 94 °C, 15 s at 60 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. Amplification, detection, and analysis were performed with the CFX96TM real time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad CFX96 real time qPCR thermocycler).
Monocyte-derives macrophages (MoMɸs) and monocyte-derives dendritic cells (MoDCs)
Monocytes were isolated from whole blood of healthy volunteers using CD14+ MACS isolation (miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladback, Germany), and differentiated into MoMɸs using 20 ng/mL macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) [32] or MoDCS using 20 ng/mL granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulation factor (GM-CSF; Biosource/invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 0.86 ng/mL human rIL4 (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in RPMI + 10% FCS supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin [33]. On day 6, MoMɸs or MoDCs were harvested, counted and 50,000 cells/well for uptake, and 100,000 cells/well for flowcytometry were plated in flat bottom 96 wells plate and rested for overnight at 37 °C + 5% CO2.
Sporozoite uptake analysis
MoMɸs were stimulated with 1:1 ratio SPZ for one hour at 37 °C + 5% CO2. Next, the cells were fixed by 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) 15 min at RT. Each well was washed 3 times with PBS. After permeabilization with permeabilization buffer (Affymetritimes, Santa Clara, CA, USA) the cells were first stained with 10 µg/mL primary monoclonal anti-CSP 3SP2 in PBS for 45 min, washed and then incubated with secondary antibody goat anti mouse AF647 (Invitrogen) 1:1000 in PBS for 45 min in the dark. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 1:200 for 20 min in the dark. Finally, the cell membrane was stained with CellBrite (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) 1:200 in PBS for 10 min in the dark. Between each step the cells were gently washed 3 times with PBS. Uptake of SPZ by MoMɸs was measured by Dragon fly confocal microscopy (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar). Number of cells was counted by ImageJ and number of SPZ taken up by MoMɸs was counted by using the Imaris software (version 9.8, Oxford) by two independent readers. MoMɸs with a total of 5 donors (provided by Sanquin Amsterdam, NL) were stimulated over two separate experiments with different mosquito batches and analysed in duplicate.
MoMɸs flowcytometry and cytokine measurements
In addition, the phenotype of MoMɸs was assessed by flow cytometry and cytokine measurements. For this purpose, MoMɸs were stimulated with 1:1 ratio SPZ, salivary gland extract (SGE) as a negative control, medium as background or 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as a positive control for 24 h at 37 °C + 5% CO2. After 24 h supernatant was collected and the cells were harvested, washed with PBS and stained for CD209 (DCN46; BD Bioscience), CD163 (9332, BD Bioscience), PD-L1 (MIH1; BD Bioscience) ILT3 (zm4.1; Biolegend), CD206 (15-2; Biolegend), CD80 (L307.3; BD Bioscience), CD25 (2A3; BD Bioscience), aqua live/dead staining (Thermofisher), Fc-block (BD Bioscience) in PBS for 30 min at 4 °C and measured by flow cytometry using LSR Fortessa (BD bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The data was analysed by FlowJo version 10.8 (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA). After 24 h stimulation of MoMɸs with SPZ from day 14, 17 and 20 post blood meal, and controls (LPS, SGE, medium) the supernatants were diluted 1:5 (IL6) or 1:2 (IL10 and TNF) and analysed by standard ELISA (Sanquin, The Netherlands).
CSP specific CD8+ T-cell co-culture
CSP specific CD8+ T-cells (kindly provided by Prof. G. Corradin, University of Lausanne, Switzerland) were cultured as described previously [19]. Briefly, expanded CSP specific CD8+ T-cells were thawed and cultured with irradiated Human Leukocyte Antigens a2 (HLA-A*02) positive Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) (Sanquin, Amsterdam), 5 ng/mL human rIL-15 (Miltenyi Biotec), 5 ng/mL human rIL-7 (Miltenyi Biotec) and aCD3/28 Dynabeads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in IMDM + 10% heath inactivated human serum. After two days, 50 U/mL human rIL-2 (Miltenyi Biotec) was added. When needed the cells were split and 100 U/mL IL-2 was added. The cells were used 10 days after expansion.
MoDCs and MoMɸs of HLA-A*02 donors were stimulated for 24 h at 37 °C + 5% CO2 with 1:1 ratio live SPZ, SGE or dead SPZ, killed by 3 times snap freezing in liquid nitrogen. After 24 h the cells were counted and 10,000 SPZ stimulated MoMɸs and 10,000 SPZ stimulated MoDCS were co-cultured with 40,000 CSP specific CD8+ T-cells in a U bottom 96 wells plate and incubated o/n at 37 °C + 5% CO2. After 4 h 3 µg/mL brefeldin A (Thermofisher) was added to the culture. The following day, the cells were harvested and washed with PBS and stained with aqua live/dead (Thermofisher) for 20 min at RT. The cells were washed and fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in PBS for 15 min at RT. The cells were washed twice and stained with CD137 PE (Biolegend), CD3 APC-ef780 (eBioscience), IFNy HV450 (Biolegend), Perforin PERCP-ef710 (eBioscience), Granzyme A PECy7 (Biolegend), Granzyme B APC (Biolegend) for 30 min at 4 °C and measured by flow cytometry using LSR Fortessa (BD bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) and analysed by FlowJo version 10.8 (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).
Statistical analysis
Data was analysed using SPSS. Comparison between two independent data groups were made by Mann Whitney U test (for nonparametric data) or Fishers exact. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. PLS-DA performed with R studio, tSNE with Matlab.
Results
Number of SPZ and viability
First the number of salivary gland SPZ was determined by microscopic counting. There were no significant differences in the number of SPZ per mosquito dissected at day 14 (mean 8.4; SD 4.33) day 17 (mean 8.9; SD 5.5) or day 20 (mean 8.2; SD 3.4) post blood meal, between batches (Fig. 2A), nor within the same batch of mosquitoes (Additional file 1). Subsequently, the percentages of live and dead SPZ using the viability marker propidium iodide were determined. At day 14 post blood meal, there were no significant differences in proportion of live SPZ (mean 79.5%; SD 2.1) as compared to day 17 (mean 89.1%; SD 1.9) or day 20 SPZ (mean 88.1%; SD 5.4. Figure 2B).
Sporozoite motility
Next the motility of the SPZ at 14, 17 or 20 days post blood meal by immunofluorescence staining of SPZ tracks (gliding assay) was analysed. There was a significant decrease in percentage of motile SPZ harvested at later timepoints (day 14: mean 89.1%; SD 6.0, day 17: mean 80.2%; SD 14.4, day 20: mean 70.8%; SD 12.0, day 14 compared with day 20: p ≤ 0.0001, Fig. 3B). In addition, motile SPZ on average showed a decrease in the distance travelled over time at later timepoints, as measured by the number of circles counted per sporozoite (day 14: mean log 0.9; SD 1.0, day 17: mean log 0.6; SD 1.2, day 20: mean log 0.3; SD 0.8, p ≤ 0.0001, Fig. 3C).
In addition to a traditional assessment by gliding assay, SPZ motility using purpose-built tracking software (SMOOT) which allows us to extract kinetic features in more detail was analysed. The following parameters were extracted: number of frames per track, velocity, angular dispersion and straightness index. When analysing motility features for each of the SPZ ages separately, a significant decrease in number of frames between SPZ from 14 days post blood meal (mean 50.8, Additional file 2A) as compared with 17 days (mean 28.6) and 20 days post blood meal (mean 31.9) were observed, confirming that day 14 SPZ on average have longer tracks. In addition, an increase in velocity (day 14: mean 1.2, day 17: mean 1.6, day 20 mean: 1.6, Additional file 2B) angular dispersion (day 14: mean 0.5, day 17: mean 0.6, day 20 mean: 0.7, Additional file 2C) and straightness index (day 14: mean 0.3, day 17: mean 0.4, day 20 mean: 0.4, Additional file 2D) for 14 days post blood meal SPZ was found, indicating slower and more chaotic movement patterns for the day 14 SPZ.
Day 14 SPZ could be separated from older SPZ by partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) analysis (Fig. 4A). The PLS-DA loading plot (Fig. 4B) showed that the length of the SPZ track (frames/track) positively discriminates day 14 SPZ from 17 and 20 SPZ. Additionally, straightness index and velocity of day 17 SPZ and angular dispersion of day 20 SPZ are also kinetic features distinguishing day 14 SPZ from their counterparts. Using T-Distributed Stochastic Neighbour Embedding (tSNE) a clear clustering into 4 motility clusters (Fig. 4C–E) was observed. SPZ of all ages were almost represented equally in cluster 2 and 3 (Fig. 4D). Cluster 1 was overrepresented in young day 14 SPZ with 42.2% of events, as compared to 22.4% in cluster 2, 20.7% in cluster 3 and 14.7% in cluster 4 (Fig. 4D). Cluster 1 SPZ showed an increased number of frames, a lower velocity, and a slightly lower angular dispersion and straightness index as compared to the other clusters, suggesting that SPZ in this cluster move longer, slower and more chaotic. Within cluster 1 almost half (49%) were young day 14 SPZ and only 17% old day 20 SPZ.
To investigate whether the motility patterns are unique to viable SPZ, the differences in oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) metabolic states (Additional file 3A–D) were investigated. There were no significant differences when SPZ age (OCR, AUC Day 14: mean 68.4 SD 128; Day 20: mean 23.16 SD 32, ECAR, AUC Day 14: mean 58.34; SD 60, Day 20: mean 71.97; SD 58, Additional file 3A–C). An increase in ECAR is known as a metabolic pathway shown active in cells undergoing stress [34], and shows that day 20 SPZ are not consistently more stressed than day 14 SPZ, although these data were highly variable. When the basal energy metabolism was investigated, which can be calculated by dividing OCR by ECAR AUC score, there were no differences observed in basal energy when SPZ age (Day 14: mean 1.77, Day 20: mean 0.32, Additional file 3D). These data suggest that the metabolic activity of day 20 SPZ is comparable with day 14 SPZ and thus OCR and ECAR metabolic changes do not underly the different motility patterns between day 14 and 20 SPZ.
Collectively, these data show that SPZ from 14 days post blood meal move more, longer, with a lower velocity, more chaotic and more in circles compared with SPZ at 17 and 20 days post blood meal even though they share comparable metabolic activity.
Infectivity
To analyse the effect of the SPZ age on infectivity, a hepatocyte infection assay in HC-04.j7 cells was performed (Fig. 5A). In the number HC-04.j7 cells infected with SPZ at a later age a 2.2 fold decrease was found, e.g. day 17 SPZ (mean 513; SD 43. p = 0.0007. Figure 5B). Additionally, day 20 SPZ (mean 563; SD 298. p = 0.004. Figure 5B) show a twofold decrease in the number of exoerythrocytic forms (EEFs) as compared with day 14 SPZ (mean 1110; SD 332. Figure 5B). We further confirmed infectivity by 18S PCR (Day 14: mean 40-Ct 27; SD 0.3. Day 17: mean 40-Ct 26; SD 0.6. Day 20: mean 40-Ct 26; SD 0.8. Day 14 compared with day 17 p = 0.02, Day 14 compared with day 20 p = 0.008. Figure 5C) and EXP1 PCR (Day 14: mean 40-Ct 13; SD 0.6. Day 17: mean 40-Ct 12; SD 1.2. Day 20: mean 40-Ct 12; SD 0.8. Day 14 compared with day 20 p = 0.02. Figure 5D). In conclusion, the decreased motility of SPZ harvested at a later age correlates with a decrease in hepatocyte infectivity of SPZ in vitro.
SPZ immunogenicity
Having shown a decrease in SPZ motility and infectivity with SPZ age, their immunogenicity by looking at phagocytic uptake of SPZ by MoMɸs and subsequent phenotypic and functional responses was investigated next. Despite the fact that older SPZ move less, a significant decrease in uptake of these SPZ by MoMɸs was found (Day 14: mean 7.6%; SD 1.7. Day 17: mean 5.0%; SD 1.6. Day 20 mean 4.1%; SD 1.6. Figure 6A, B). In parallel, the surface marker expression of PD-L1 and CD80 MoMɸs after phagocytosis of SPZ decreased when harvested at later timepoints, e.g. PD-L1 expression decreased from MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) fold change 6.3 (SD 2.3, Fig. 6C) of day 14 SPZ to MFI fold change 4.3 (SD 1.0) at day 17 and MFI fold change 4.1 (SD 2.6) at day 20 (p = 0.02). CD80 expression also decreased somewhat from mean 2.4 (SD 1.1. Figure 6D) at day 14 to mean 1.6 (SD 0.3) and mean 1.8 (SD 2.6) at day 17 and day 20 respectively, although these changes were not significant. With a decrease in surface marker expression, MoMɸs also produced significantly less of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (p = 0.005) and regulatory cytokine IL-10 (p = 0.009) between SPZ harvested at 14 days post blood meal and 20 days post blood meal (Fig. 6E, F). Interestingly, other phenotype markers and functional cytokines such as pro-inflammatory CD163 (p = 0.35), anti-inflammatory CD209 (p = 0.84) and pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF (p = 0.75) did not show any difference in expression nor production after stimulation with SPZ harvested at day 14 as compared with day 20 (Additional file 4A–C). These data suggest that the differences in immunogenicity are not caused by the differences in SPZ uptake but are marker and cytokine specific.
Because of the mixed expression of both pro- (CD80) and anti-inflammatory (PDL-1) markers and cytokines (IL-6, IL-10), the functional consequences of the changed surface marker expression and cytokine secretion were investigated. MoMɸs and moDCS were stimulated with SPZ of 14 days and 20 days post bloodmeal and co-cultured with CD8+ T-cells specific to an epitope sequence of the surface circumsporozoite protein (CSP) of SPZ as previously described [19]. Interestingly, a trend towards increased numbers of CD137+ CD8+ T-cells, a marker for T-cell activation was found after the co-culture with day 20 SPZ (mean 12.3%; SD 6.9. Figure 7A–C) as compared to day 14 SPZ (mean 8.3%; SD 2.5). Similarly, an increased number of IFNγ+ CD8+ T-cells after co-culture with day 20 SPZ (mean 2.6%; SD 1.2. Figure 7A, D) compared to day 14 SPZ was found (mean 1.9%; SD 0.9). These data suggest that aging SPZ lose their ability to downregulate CD8+ T-cell activation.
To investigate whether the ability to downregulate CD8+ T-cells is unique to viable SPZ, the antigen presentation between MoMɸs, MoDCs and CD8+ T-cells after stimulation with dead SPZ, harvested and killed at the same ages was investigated. Dead SPZ overall showed less CD8+ T-cell activation as measured by CD137+ expression (day 14 2.4 fold decrease, day 20 2.9 fold decrease; Fig. 7A) and IFNγ+ production (day 14 1.6 fold decrease, day 20 2.8 fold decrease; Fig. 7B). Dead SPZ harvested at day 14 and day 20 showed comparable capacity to activate CD8+ T-cells as salivary gland extract (SGE) used as a negative control (CD137 day 14 p = 0.15, day 20 p = 1.0; IFNγ+ day 14 p = 0.78, day 20 p = 1.0) (Additional file 5A–C, Additional file 6). This makes us conclude that the differences of CD8+ T-cell downregulation are caused by viable SPZ.
In conclusion, the ratio of 14 days compared with 20 days post blood meal SPZ seems to be increased for uptake (1.85), expression and production of several anti- (PDL-1, 1.54; IL-10, 5.78) and pro-inflammatory (CD80, 1.33; IL-6, 3.82) markers and cytokines in MoMɸs, which was paralleled with an decrease of CD137+ (0.47) and IFNγ+ (0.73) CD8+ T-cells in co-culture experiments (Fig. 7C). These data suggest that aging SPZ lose the ability to downregulate CD8+ T-cell activation.
Discussion
This study shows that old P. falciparum SPZ, harvested at 17–20 days post blood meal have decreased motility, with less motile SPZ and shorter tracks compared with day 14 P. falciparum SPZ. This is paralleled by a decrease of SPZ infectivity, SPZ uptake by macrophages and an decreased ability to downregulate CD8+ T-cells. These differences were not explained by a reduction in viability of SPZ of older ages, or a difference in ORC and ECAR metabolic states.
Co-culture of CD8+ T-cells with APCs stimulated with dead (heat killed) P. falciparum SPZ demonstrated that these age-related changes were not caused by dying SPZ. This resulted in the same level of CD8+ T-cell activation as for the negative SGE control and the opposite effect for day 20 SPZ. In addition, there were no changes in oxygen consumption rate between the younger day 14 and older day 20 P. falciparum SPZ. These findings indicate that day 20 SPZ are still alive and metabolically similarly active as their counterparts. It can thus be hypothesized that functional changes in the antigen expression and/or changes in motility ligands underlie the changing motility, infectivity and immunogenicity profile.
The remarkable alignment between the findings of SPZ motility and infectivity in vitro suggests that gliding motility is essential for SPZ to successfully infect. Whereas this is not very surprising, and has been reported before [35], the use of the in house custom made SMOOT software now allowed us to identify the subset of SPZ responsible for the subtle motility differences between SPZ at different ages. This led to the hypothesis that the SPZ subset with these specific characteristics (longer tracks, slower and more chaotic, e.g. cluster 1 motility SPZ, of which 49% day 14 SPZ) are the most infectious and therefore the decrease of their relative abundancy underlies decreasing infectivity at later ages.
The decrease in infectivity and regulatory potential of ageing P. falciparum SPZ may be particularly relevant to a better understanding of the infectious reservoir of naturally occurring Anopheline mosquitoes. Even though some Anopheles mosquitoes in nature can persist beyond 20 days, the data within this study suggest that these mosquitoes are likely much less infectious. In addition to the differences within mosquito salivary SPZ at different timepoints post blood meal, also P. falciparum oocyst SPZ were found to be less infectious and less motile as compared to P. falciparum salivary gland SPZ [10, 15, 36–38]. Genes essential to SPZ motility and infectivity, like CSP [39, 40] or TRAP [41], are specifically switched on just prior to SPZ release into the skin. Such switch in transcription patterns may be induced by changes in mosquito-derived proteins such as mosGILT, which is known to reduce SPZ infectivity [9]. Potentially such switches in gene expression may also be responsible for the age-related differences. Moreover, since An. stephensi is routinely used to generate whole SPZ vaccines, these findings are helpful for the further optimization of whole SPZ-based vaccination strategy.
The changing immunogenicity of SPZ at different ages may be particularly relevant for vaccine development. For example, the age of whole SPZ vaccines may affect their potency. Whole SPZ vaccines are one of the most successful vaccines so far even though their potency is somewhat lower in endemic sites [42–45]. Antigen presenting cells have been shown to play a critical role in the activation of CD8+ T-cells which are presumed to be one of the effector cells induced by whole SPZ vaccines [18–20]. This study demonstrated that APCs co-cultured with older SPZ are more likely to skew CD8+ T-cells towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype. The decreased regulatory potential of older SPZ begs the question of whether these aged SPZ may be more suited to induce effective malaria immunity. At the same time, whole SPZ vaccines critically rely on the infectivity of the vaccine SPZ, which may be much better at day 14. If the combination of changing infectivity and immunogenicity of aged SPZ in vitro will have similar impact on in vivo infectivity and immunogenicity is uncertain. Given the current limitations of animal models for assessing susceptibility to P. falciparum malaria and immunogenicity simultaneously, this question cannot be answered using pre-clinical models. Therefore, what the most optimal timepoint should be for whole SPZ vaccine manufacturing remains to be investigated. The in vitro data highlight the importance of age of SPZ used when addressing vaccine formulation and efficacy. Moreover, it also highlights the importance of standardization of mosquito age across research centres for pre-clinical and clinical whole-sporozoite malaria to allow for direct comparison of data outputs.
Conclusion
This study aimed to get a better insight into functional changes in salivary gland SPZ and their effect on the human immune system. Day 17–20 SPZ were shown to have decreased motility, infectivity, SPZ uptake by macrophages and a decreased ability to downregulate CD8+ T-cells. Such insights are a first step towards a better understanding of salivary gland SPZ maturation, infectivity and regulatory potential.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the use of the HC-04.j7 cells provided by Dr. R. Dinglasan and the CSP CD8+ T-cells provided by Prof. G. Corradin.
Author contributions
Study concept and design: RS, BF, MR. Acquisition of data: RS, CMK, AJH. Analyses and interpretation of data: RS, SA, CMK, JCS, FWBL, BF, MR. Drafting the manuscript: RS, BF, MR. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: RS, CMK, FWBL, BF, MR. Technical or material support: RS, CMK, JCS, SB, AJH, EB, FG, HMB, SCM, MO. Study supervision: BF, MR.
Funding
M. Roestenberg was supported by a VIDI fellowship from the Dutch Scientific Organisation (Grant number 09150172010035),
Availability of data and materials
The datasets supporting the conclusion of this article are included within the article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.WHO. World Malaria Report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022
- 2.Snow RW. Global malaria eradication and the importance of Plasmodium falciparum epidemiology in Africa. BMC Med. 2015;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0254-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mishra S, Nussenzweig RS, Nussenzweig V. Antibodies to Plasmodium circumsporozoite protein (CSP) inhibit sporozoite's cell traversal activity. J Immunol Methods. 2012;377:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Walther M. Advances in vaccine development against the pre-erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2006;5:81–93. doi: 10.1586/14760584.5.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Epstein JE, Paolino KM, Richie TL, Sedegah M, Singer A, Ruben AJ, et al. Protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria by PfSPZ Vaccine. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e89154. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.89154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Molina-Franky J, Cuy-Chaparro L, Camargo A, Reyes C, Gomez M, Salamanca DR, et al. Plasmodium falciparum pre-erythrocytic stage vaccine development. Malar J. 2020;19:56. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3141-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ghosh AK, Jacobs-Lorena M. Plasmodium sporozoite invasion of the mosquito salivary gland. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bennink S, Kiesow MJ, Pradel G. The development of malaria parasites in the mosquito midgut. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:905–918. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schleicher TR, Yang J, Freudzon M, Rembisz A, Craft S, Hamilton M, et al. A mosquito salivary gland protein partially inhibits Plasmodium sporozoite cell traversal and transmission. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2908. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05374-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lindner SE, Swearingen KE, Shears MJ, Sebastian A, Walker MP, Vrana EN, et al. Addendum: Transcriptomics and proteomics reveal two waves of translational repression during the maturation of malaria parasite sporozoites. Nat Commun. 2022;13:283. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27767-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Porter RJ, Laird RL, Dusseau EM. Studies on malarial sporozoites. II. Effect of age and dosage of sporozoites on their infectiousness. Exp Parasitol. 1954;3:276–374. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(54)90026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gillies MT, Wilkes TJ. A study of the age-composition of populations of Anopheles gambiae Giles and A. funestus Giles in North-Eastern Tanzania. Bull Entomol Res. 1965;56:237–262. doi: 10.1017/s0007485300056339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lines JD, Wilkes TJ, Lyimo EO. Human malaria infectiousness measured by age-specific sporozoite rates in Anopheles gambiae in Tanzania. Parasitology. 1991;102:167–177. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000062454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cockburn IA, Seder RA. Malaria prevention: from immunological concepts to effective vaccines and protective antibodies. Nat Immunol. 2018;19:1199–1211. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu F, Zheng H, Chen S, Zhang K, Qin X, Zhang J, et al. Malaria oocysts require circumsporozoite protein to evade mosquito immunity. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30988-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sultan AA, Thathy V, Frevert U, Robson KJ, Crisanti A, Nussenzweig V, et al. TRAP is necessary for gliding motility and infectivity of Plasmodium sporozoites. Cell. 1997;90:511–522. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80511-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Corradin G, Levitskaya J. Priming of CD8(+) T cell responses to liver stage malaria parasite antigens. Front Immunol. 2014;5:527. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Osii RS, Otto TD, Garside P, Ndungu FM, Brewer JM. The impact of malaria parasites on dendritic cell-T cell interaction. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1597. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Winkel BMF, Pelgrom LR, van Schuijlenburg R, Baalbergen E, Ganesh MS, Gerritsma H, et al. Plasmodium sporozoites induce regulatory macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008799. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chakravarty S, Cockburn IA, Kuk S, Overstreet MG, Sacci JB, Zavala F. CD8+ T lymphocytes protective against malaria liver stages are primed in skin-draining lymph nodes. Nat Med. 2007;13:1035–1041. doi: 10.1038/nm1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ejigiri I, Sinnis P. Plasmodium sporozoite-host interactions from the dermis to the hepatocyte. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12:401–407. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oneko M, Steinhardt LC, Yego R, Wiegand RE, Swanson PA, Kc N, et al. Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of PfSPZ Vaccine against malaria in infants in western Kenya: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:1636–1645. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01470-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ponnudurai T, Leeuwenberg AD, Meuwissen JH. Chloroquine sensitivity of isolates of Plasmodium falciparum adapted to in vitro culture. Trop Geogr Med. 1981;33:50–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lensen A, Bril A, van de Vegte M, van Gemert GJ, Eling W, Sauerwein R. Plasmodium falciparum: infectivity of cultured, synchronized gametocytes to mosquitoes. Exp Parasitol. 1999;91:101–103. doi: 10.1006/expr.1998.4354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ponnudurai T, Lensen AH, Van Gemert GJ, Bensink MP, Bolmer M, Meuwissen JH. Infectivity of cultured Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes to mosquitoes. Parasitology. 1989;98:165–173. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000062065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Churcher TS, Blagborough AM, Delves M, Ramakrishnan C, Kapulu MC, Williams AR, et al. Measuring the blockade of malaria transmission–an analysis of the standard membrane feeding assay. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42:1037–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Coleman J, Juhn J, James AA. Dissection of midgut and salivary glands from Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. J Vis Exp. 2007;5:228. doi: 10.3791/228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nardin EH, Nussenzweig V, Nussenzweig RS, Collins WE, Harinasuta KT, Tapchaisri P, et al. Circumsporozoite proteins of human malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. J Exp Med. 1982;156:20–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.156.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Winkel BMF, de Korne CM, van Oosterom MN, Staphorst D, Meijhuis M, Baalbergen E, et al. Quantification of wild-type and radiation attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite motility in human skin. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49895-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.de Korne CM, van Schuijlenburg R, Sijtsma JC, de Bes HM, Baalbergen E, Azargoshasb S, et al. Sporozoite motility as a quantitative readout for anti-CSP antibody inhibition. Sci Rep. 2022;12:17194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22154-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Korne CM, Lageschaar LT, van Oosterom MN, Baalbergen E, Winkel BMF, Chevalley-Maurel SC, et al. Regulation of Plasmodium sporozoite motility by formulation components. Malar J. 2019;18:155. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2794-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tarique AA, Logan J, Thomas E, Holt PG, Sly PD, Fantino E. Phenotypic, functional, and plasticity features of classical and alternatively activated human macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;53:676–688. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0012OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hussaarts L, Smits HH, Schramm G, van der Ham AJ, van der Zon GC, Haas H, et al. Rapamycin and omega-1: mTOR-dependent and -independent Th2 skewing by human dendritic cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91:486–489. doi: 10.1038/icb.2013.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dranka BP, Benavides GA, Diers AR, Giordano S, Zelickson BR, Reily C, et al. Assessing bioenergetic function in response to oxidative stress by metabolic profiling. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51:1621–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mota MM, Pradel G, Vanderberg JP, Hafalla JC, Frevert U, Nussenzweig RS, et al. Migration of Plasmodium sporozoites through cells before infection. Science. 2001;291:141–144. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5501.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang Q, Fujioka H, Nussenzweig V. Exit of Plasmodium sporozoites from oocysts is an active process that involves the circumsporozoite protein. PLoS Pathog. 2005;1:e9. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Real E, Howick VM, Dahalan FA, Witmer K, Cudini J, Andradi-Brown C, et al. A single-cell atlas of Plasmodium falciparum transmission through the mosquito. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3196. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23434-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Luckhart S, Riehle MA. Midgut mitochondrial function as a gatekeeper for malaria parasite infection and development in the mosquito host. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:593159. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.593159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Foquet L, Hermsen CC, van Gemert GJ, Van Braeckel E, Weening KE, Sauerwein R, et al. Vaccine-induced monoclonal antibodies targeting circumsporozoite protein prevent Plasmodium falciparum infection. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:140–144. doi: 10.1172/JCI70349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Swearingen KE, Lindner SE, Shi L, Shears MJ, Harupa A, Hopp CS, et al. Interrogating the Plasmodium sporozoite surface: identification of surface-exposed proteins and demonstration of glycosylation on CSP and TRAP by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005606. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beyer K, Kracht S, Kehrer J, Singer M, Klug D, Frischknecht F. Limited Plasmodium sporozoite gliding motility in the absence of TRAP family adhesins. Malar J. 2021;20:430. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03960-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arama C, Troye-Blomberg M. The path of malaria vaccine development: challenges and perspectives. J Intern Med. 2014;275:456–466. doi: 10.1111/joim.12223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Butler NS, Vaughan AM, Harty JT, Kappe SH. Whole parasite vaccination approaches for prevention of malaria infection. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Itsara LS, Zhou Y, Do J, Grieser AM, Vaughan AM, Ghosh AK. The development of whole sporozoite vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2748. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sirima SB, Ouedraogo A, Tiono AB, Kabore JM, Bougouma EC, Ouattara MS, et al. A randomized controlled trial showing safety and efficacy of a whole sporozoite vaccine against endemic malaria. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14:eabj3776. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj3776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets supporting the conclusion of this article are included within the article.