Abstract
The Sangiran dome is the primary stratigraphic window for the Plio-Pleistocene deposits of the Solo basin of Central Jawa. The dome has yielded nearly 80 Homo erectus fossils, around 50 of which have known findspots. With a hornblende 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of 1.66 ± 0.04 mega-annum (Ma) reportedly associated with two fossils [Swisher, C.C., III, Curtis, G. H., Jacob, T., Getty, A. G., Suprijo, A. & Widiasmoro (1994) Science 263, 1118–1121), the dome offers evidence that early Homo dispersed to East Asia during the earliest Pleistocene. Unfortunately, the hornblende pumice was sampled at Jokotingkir Hill, a central locality with complex lithostratigraphic deformation and dubious specimen provenance. To address the antiquity of Sangiran H. erectus more systematically, we investigate the sedimentary framework and hornblende 40Ar/39Ar age for volcanic deposits in the southeast quadrant of the dome. In this sector, Bapang (Kabuh) sediments have their largest exposure, least deformation, and most complete tephrostratigraphy. At five locations, we identify a sequence of sedimentary cycles in which H. erectus fossils are associated with epiclastic pumice. From sampled pumice, eight hornblende separates produced 40Ar/39Ar plateau ages ranging from 1.51 ± 0.08 Ma at the Bapang/Sangiran Formation contact, to 1.02 ± 0.06 Ma, at a point above the hominin-bearing sequence. The chronological sequence of 40Ar/39Ar ages follows stratigraphic order across the southeast quadrant. An intermediate level yielding four nearly complete crania has an age of about 1.25 Ma.
Keywords: geochronology, human evolution, Homo erectus, Southeast Asia, tephrostratigraphy
Within the Solo basin of Central Jawa, an abrupt change from lacustrine to fluvial sedimentation marks the contact between the Pucangan and the overlying Kabuh Formations. Within the Sangiran dome, the primary stratigraphic window for the basin, these deposits are known as the Sangiran and Bapang Formations, respectively (1). Although the upper units of the Sangiran Formation have yielded Homo erectus fossils, Bapang sediments have produced many more and indicate a hominin species well established on the Sundan subcontinent. The Bapang Formation represents an aggraded fluvial system built up in a number of energetic cycles. The sediments themselves were derived from the eruptions of one or more volcanoes east of the basin and from the weathering of carbonate–silicate highlands uplifting north and south (Fig. 1b).
Bapang Sedimentary Cycles
At the two Bapang village reference sections (Bpg A and Bpg B), five complete normally graded cycles are visible, referred to here as C1 to C5 (Fig. 2). Each cycle has two distinct sedimentary facies, commencing with an a-facies below and terminating with a b-facies above. The a-facies beds comprise poorly sorted planar- and cross-bedded gravels and sands. Clasts consist of andesite and rounded dacitic pumice as well as microcrystalline quartz derived from carbonate rocks. C1a, the lowest level of which defines the traditional “Grenzbank” (GB), includes a greater range of clast sizes scoured from locally underlying deposits, including clay cobbles from the adjacent lacustrine sediments, foraminifera from marine rocks, and andesite boulders from laharic deposits. The a-facies sediments have interbedded ashy tuffaceous lenses, locally termed “tuffs” (1). Notable are the C1a Lowest Tuff (LtT) that appears only at Bapang, and the C2a tuffaceous silt level found at Bapang and Sendangbusik. The latter feature is closely associated with hominin fossils (Fig. 2).
The b-facies beds are poorly to moderately sorted tuffaceous silts and sands consisting of altered volcanic glass with interspersed angular to subangular crystals and altered lithic clasts. Bedding in the b-facies sediments is planar to massive, with rare cross bedding. Three of the poorly sorted, tuffaceous b-facies have previously been called the Lower (C1b), Middle (C2b), and Upper (C4b) “Tuffs” (1). The Middle Tuff (MT) is the most widely distributed and variable. At Bapang and Pucung, MT is distinct, fine-grained, homogeneous, and surface-scoured. It constitutes a tuffaceous silt zone at Tanjung, and is reworked within a sandy, braided fluvial C2b unit at Sendangbusik and Grogolwetan.
The upper reaches of the major b-facies units exhibit features of subaerial weathering. Among them are small, vertically oriented, tubes with dense lateral distribution that appear to be root casts for grassy plants and burrows for small insects. The presence of grassy plants is corroborated by extant pollen profiles (2). These tubes and other open spaces are commonly lined with microlaminated clay. At Bapang and Pucung, the MT shows light paleosol development. At Pucung, Upper Tuff (UT) overlies a distinct clay-rich lens whose organic component may represent a paleosol A-horizon. At the bases of C2a, C3a, and C5a, renewed fluvial action scoured the surfaces of LT, MT, and UT, respectively. As weathering features do not extend up into the overlying a-facies unit, they must antedate the subsequent erosion.
The paired facies indicate a fluvial regime of energetic basal stream channel deposits overlain by lower-energy stream and overbank sediments. The series fines generally from bottom to top. Epiclastic pumice is found in each a-facies, with typical grain sizes decreasing from pebble- to cobble-sized in the lower two cycles to granule- to pebble-sized in the upper cycles. Course pumice has short residence times in energetic fluvial systems such as these. Therefore, its presence in the a-facies is consistent with deposition shortly after eruption.
The a-facies yield megafauna fossils in coarse sediment lenses, especially at unit bases. The b-facies sediments are devoid of megafauna. The richest a-facies “bone beds” lie in C1a, and are attributable to the Trinil H.K. fauna. C2a through C5a contain Kedung Brubus stage fossils, as identified by de Vos et al. (3). The sedimentary cycles aid in interpreting dome hominin fossil taphonomy. Highly fragmented gnathic remains have been found most commonly in C1 sediments [12 specimens from the “Grenzbank” (GB) itself]. C2a and C3a present more cranial elements in more complete form. C5a yields the stratigraphically highest hominin fossil (calotte S3) in a notably good state of preservation. The overall change in fossil fragmentation patterns correlates with diminishing fluvial energy throughout the sedimentation sequence.
Across the southeast quadrant, C2a sediments have conserved a number of well known cranial and dental fossils, including cranium S17 at Pucung, and occipital fragments Sbk-1979.04 (variously referred to as S37a/b and as S39 and S40a) as well as incisor Sbk-1997.06 at Sendangbusik (4). Recently, three more adult cranial fossils have been documented in situ (Figs. 1 and 2): cranium Tjg-1993.05 (5), calotte Gwn-1993.09 (6), and calotte Sbk-1996.02 (7). A fourth important specimen, occipital Brn-1996.04, has been found in Sangiran Formation sediments near Bapang village. Within a scope of research that covers the entire hominin-bearing Bapang sedimentary sequence in the southeast quadrant, we focus on sediments surrounding the C2a specimens, which are anatomically more complete and stratigraphically better documented than most dome finds.
Tephrochronology
Pumice clasts are associated with all a-facies fossil beds and they have a relatively uniform mineralogy throughout the sedimentary sequence, suggesting that they erupted from a single volcano. Petrographic examination of thin-sections taken from 25 representative pumice clasts shows 10–20 vol. % complexly zoned euhedral to subhedral plagioclase phenocrysts and 3–7 vol. % euhedral to subhedral hornblende phenocrysts. Euhedral to subhedral magnetite phenocrysts, often associated with apatite, compose up to 2 vol. %. In most samples, phenocrystic phases show eruption shattering, and groundmasses are generally colorless glass with abundant vesicles. Also relatively common are microlites of plagioclase, hornblende, and apatite. Clays or calcite partially replace groundmass glass in a few samples. The mineral abundances resemble those found in pumice clasts of the Lawu cone, 30 km to the east (8).
Although the background mineralogy of the pumice clasts is homogenous, augite content and hornblende color vary with stratigraphic position (Fig. 2). Pumice sampled in C1a (below MT) generally lacks augite phenocrysts and has bright green hornblende, whereas pumice sampled in C3a and C4a (above MT) has 1–5 vol. % euhedral to subhedral augite and brownish-green hornblende. Pumice in C2a (MT) is transitional for augite content. With one exception, the mineralogy of the b-facies tuffaceous sediments typically does not match that of the a-facies. This probably reflects fluvial reworking of older tephras and soils as well as in place alteration and soil formation. In exception, the augite content and hornblende color observed in tuffaceous silt at Bpg B-1 (UT) match those of pumice clasts sampled in similar stratigraphic position (Bpg A-1, Tjg-1, and Pcg-1).
Plagioclase is the dominant phenocryst in the Bapang pumices, and it has been successfully dated in other volcanic settings (9). Nevertheless, age determinations using plagioclase can be erroneous (10, 11). We analyzed both plagioclase and hornblende separates from site Bpg B-1 to assess the utility of each mineral for geochronology in the Sangiran dome (see Table 3 and Fig. 6, which are published as supplemental data on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org). Whereas two Bpg B-1 hornblende splits yielded flat age spectra with analytically identical plateau ages [1.04 ± 0.04 mega-annum (Ma) and 0.99 ± 0.04 Ma], the plagioclase separate produced a discordant age spectrum. The plagioclase results most likely reflect the presence of extraneous argon inherited from either incompletely degassed xenocrysts or from the magmatic system.
Hornblende generally separated as pure, coarse-grained phenocrysts. The color, morphology, and grain size for each separate was consistent and therefore suggested the existence of a single magmatic hornblende population. In addition, prior K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar ages for Sangiran dome pumice samples were determined on hornblende, allowing direct comparison with our results. Most b-facies sediments contained only a few small hornblende phenocrysts of varying color, morphology, and degree of alteration, all indicators of mixed provenance. As already noted, unaltered hornblende was separable from tuffaceous silt at site Bpg B-1.
Eight hornblende separates were analyzed from the southeast quadrant and one more from Jokotingkir Hill in the central dome. For each, two to five aliquots were tested for homogeneity and analytical reproducibility (Fig. 3 and supplemental data). For the majority of laser-heated samples, ≈10–20 mg of mineral were heated in six steps. The blank corrections for 40Ar and 36Ar were highly variable, ranging from less than 1% up to ≈50% and age calculation was sensitive for steps with high blank corrections. Nevertheless, as correction sensitivity was highly variable for steps yielding similar ages, no apparent systematic error can be associated with potential blank inaccuracy. The age spectra were generally well behaved (Table 1 and Figs. 3 and 4; also see supplemental data). Weighted mean combination of plateau ages for each sample indicate eruption ages from 1.51 ± 0.08 to 0.98 ± 0.11 Ma (Fig. 3). These results conform to the stratigraphic position of the pumice samples (Fig. 2). The scatter for some of the replicate plateau age results (Table 1) could indicate minor xenocryst and/or excess argon contamination.
Table 1.
Sample | Weight, mg | Plateau age, Ma | Plateau MSWD | No. steps on plateau | % 39Ar in plateau | Total gas age, Ma |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jtr-1a | 9.82 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 5.60* | 3 | 96.1 | 3.12 ± 0.24 |
Jtr-1b | 8.81 | 1.07 ± 0.04 | 0.37 | 3 | 100 | 1.09 ± 0.10 |
Jtr-1c | 14.83 | 1.20 ± 0.11 | 9.67* | 2 | 82.5 | 2.39 ± 0.16 |
Bpg B-1a | 17.96 | 1.04 ± 0.04 | 0.47 | 6 | 100 | 1.06 ± 0.14 |
Bpg B-1b | 17.51 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 1.83 | 6 | 100 | 0.98 ± 0.14 |
Bpg B-2a | 33.06 | 1.06 ± 0.05 | 0.65 | 5 | 93.4 | 1.16 ± 0.16 |
Bpg B-2b | 11.02 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 1.12 | 6 | 100 | 1.10 ± 0.20 |
Bpg B-2c | 9.52 | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 1.11 | 6 | 100 | 0.64 ± 0.34 |
Bpg B-2d | 15.53 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 0.13 | 5 | 97 | 1.08 ± 0.14 |
Pcg-2a | 179.25 | 1.13 ± 0.08 | 2.59* | 7 | 94.5 | 0.72 ± 0.28 |
Pcg-2b | 36.68 | 0.86 ± 0.07 | 0.93 | 5 | 100 | 0.88 ± 0.68 |
Pcg-2c | 17.28 | 1.13 ± 0.07 | 1.55 | 7 | 100 | 1.07 ± 0.34 |
Pcg-2d | 20.89 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 0.55 | 5 | 92.7 | 1.07 ± 0.32 |
Tjg-2a | 12.64 | 1.21 ± 0.14 | 0.21 | 8 | 100 | 1.3 ± 2.7 |
Tjg-2b | 19.24 | 1.05 ± 0.09 | 0.59 | 6 | 100 | 1.4 ± 1.5 |
Tjg-2c | 23.77 | 1.44 ± 0.11 | 0.46 | 6 | 100 | 1.7 ± 1.7 |
Tjg-2d | 18.47 | 1.37 ± 0.08 | 1.23 | 6 | 100 | 1.48 ± 0.38 |
Gwn D-2a | 142.14 | 1.22 ± 0.05 | 1.74 | 4 | 69.9 | 1.43 ± 0.37 |
Gwn D-2b | 41.79 | 1.36 ± 0.06 | 1.5 | 5 | 100 | 1.43 ± 0.75 |
Gwn D-2c | 31.16 | 1.20 ± 0.07 | 0.21 | 5 | 100 | 1.26 ± 0.84 |
Gwn D-2d | 38.1 | 0.98 ± 0.12 | 3.14* | 5 | 100 | 1.03 ± 0.81 |
Sbk-1a | 14.44 | 1.44 ± 0.05 | 1.52 | 4 | 93.6 | 1.87 ± 0.81 |
Sbk-1b | 17.64 | 1.27 ± 0.05 | 1.28 | 6 | 96.6 | 1.48 ± 0.25 |
Sbk-1c | 12.25 | 1.27 ± 0.05 | 0.25 | 5 | 67.2 | 1.52 ± 0.27 |
Sbk-1d | 17.34 | 1.33 ± 0.04 | 1.73 | 4 | 87.4 | 1.53 ± 0.16 |
Sbk-1e | 16.94 | 1.31 ± 0.04 | 2.17 | 5 | 100 | 1.41 ± 0.14 |
Bpg B-4a | 7.96 | 1.57 ± 0.09 | 0.01 | 2 | 82.1 | 1.78 ± 0.22 |
Bpg B-4b | 18.84 | 1.19 ± 0.04 | 1.05 | 5 | 98.6 | 1.21 ± 0.31 |
Bpg B-4c | 15.27 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | 1.84 | 5 | 100 | 1.40 ± 0.18 |
Bpg B-4d | 16.01 | 1.35 ± 0.04 | 0.45 | 4 | 100 | 1.37 ± 0.13 |
Bpg B-5a | 10.9 | 1.38 ± 0.08 | 0.19 | 5 | 100 | 1.45 ± 0.32 |
Bpg B-5b | 17.37 | 1.56 ± 0.05 | 0.2 | 6 | 100 | 1.65 ± 0.65 |
Bpg B-5c | 21.83 | 1.54 ± 0.09 | 0.07 | 3 | 53.1 | 2.69 ± 0.37 |
Bpg B-5d | 18.21 | 1.37 ± 0.19 | 4.21* | 5 | 95.3 | 1.44 ± 0.63 |
Plateau and total gas age errors are 1σ. Total gas ages and errors are weighted by the % 39Ar released.
MSWD falls above the 95% confidence interval and therefore errors are multiplied by the square root of the MSWD.
Isotope correlation diagrams (Fig. 4) were produced by combining all data from each replicate experiment and removing statistical outliers (12) until the mean square of weighted deviates (MSWD) fell within the 95% confidence intervals (13). The isotope correlation ages agree generally with the plateau ages (Tables 1 and 2). However, samples Jtr-1 and Sbk-1 yielded apparent excess argon intercepts and isotope correlation ages (Jtr-1 = 0.93 ± 0.05, Sbk-1 = 1.24 ± 0.04 Ma) that are 2σ younger than their combined plateau ages (Jtr-1 = 1.10 ± 0.07, Sbk-1 = 1.33 ± 0.04 Ma). Thus, isotope correlation results may best estimate the eruption ages for Jtr-1 and Sbk-1, which conform well to the chronological trend of the plateau ages.
Table 2.
Sample | Weighted mean plateau age, Ma | Weighted mean plateau age MSWD | Isotope correlation age, Ma | 40Ar/36Ari | Isotope correlation age MSWD | # Steps for isochron | Chosen Eruption age, Ma |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jtr-1 | 1.10 ± 0.07 | 1.11 | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 323.3 ± 4.4 | 2.32 | 8 of 15 | 0.93 ± 0.05 |
Bpg B-1 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 0.88 | 1.04 ± 0.05 | 293 ± 14 | 1.76 | 9 of 12 | 1.02 ± 0.06 |
Bpg B-2 | 0.98 ± 0.11 | 4.94* | 1.01 ± 0.05 | 295.3 ± 2.6 | 1.41 | 20 of 24 | 0.98 ± 0.11 |
Pcg-2 | 1.02 ± 0.13 | 3.27* | 1.10 ± 0.08 | 292.7 ± 2.0 | 1.46 | 22 of 26 | 1.02 ± 0.13 |
Tjg-2 | 1.27 ± 0.18 | 3.31* | 1.19 ± 0.19 | 297.4 ± 4.0 | 1.06 | 28 of 28 | 1.27 ± 0.18 |
Gwn D-2 | 1.24 ± 0.12 | 3.19* | 1.27 ± 0.08 | 296.8 ± 3.2 | 1.55 | 22 of 25 | 1.24 ± 0.12 |
Sbk-1 | 1.33 ± 0.04 | 2.11 | 1.24 ± 0.04 | 304.6 ± 2.6 | 1.46 | 27 of 31 | 1.24 ± 0.04 |
Bpg B-4 | 1.30 ± 0.12 | 5.45* | 1.34 ± 0.04 | 294.6 ± 1.8 | 1.27 | 13 of 18 | 1.30 ± 0.12 |
Bpg B-5 | 1.51 ± 0.08 | 1.34 | 1.58 ± 0.09 | 293.4 ± 1.8 | 1.48 | 19 of 23 | 1.51 ± 0.08 |
Plateau age determined from weighted mean combination of individual plateau ages for each sample. Weighted mean plateau age and isotope correlation age errors are 2σ. For isotope correlation age determination method see supplemental data.
MSWD falls above the 95% confidence interval and therefore errors are multiplied by the square root of the MSWD.
Our results corroborate prior K-Ar and bulk sample 40Ar/39Ar analyses of Sangiran pumice hornblende. The Bpg B-5 sample age (1.51 ± 0.08 Ma) matches previous 40Ar/39Ar results of 1.47 Ma and 1.58 Ma for the lowest Bapang sediments (14, 15). The Tjg-2 site age (1.27 ± 0.18 Ma) corroborates a K-Ar age (1.2 ± 0.2 Ma) determined in association with the S10 findspot (16). At Pucung, the S17 findspot lies ≈5 m below MT. Pumice collected at the findspot (Pcg-2) produced an 40Ar/39Ar age (1.02 ± 0.13 Ma) statistically identical with a K-Ar age (1.05 ± 0.1 Ma) on pumice collected 12 m above the S17 findspot (17). Swisher (14, 15) has a seven-age average (1.07 Ma) for apparently similar pumice levels above MT.
When the hornblende 40Ar/39Ar age sequence and the pumice mineralogy are linked and fit into the context of the Bapang sedimentary cycles, a basic pattern emerges. Cycle 2b (MT) appears to separate a long early period of relatively energetic fluvial sedimentation from a later but more contracted period of finer deposition. Pumice clasts in C1a have green hornblende, lack augite, and have ages of about 1.5 Ma. C2a pumice has transitional mineral contents and ages of about 1.25 Ma. C3a, C4a, and C5a have pumice clasts with brown tinted hornblende and augite with ages of about 1.0 Ma. These data suggest deposition of C1 pumice shortly after an eruption, perhaps of the Lawu center, at about 1.5 Ma. C2 pumice was deposited about 0.25 Ma later after a second eruption. Pumice from C3, C4, and C5 were from one eruption or a series of closely timed eruptions at about 1 Ma. The consistency between the ages and the stratigraphy precludes recycling of pumice from an extinct eroding volcanic edifice.
Discussion
The tephrostratigraphy of the hominin-bearing sedimentary sequence of the Bapang Formation in the southeast quadrant of the Sangiran Dome provides the best means to understand the age of H. erectus on the Sundan subcontinent. Two other recent attempts to assign age to Sangiran fossils show the difficulty of working outside this restricted sedimentary context. One involves the 40Ar/39Ar age of pumice sampled in the central part of the dome (18). The second attempt involves the use of Australasian strewnfield tektites as a stratigraphic maker in Bapang sediments (19).
Across the dome, the Bapang Formation C1a unconformably overlies the Sangiran (Pucangan) Formation itself comprising three units. The upper unit has ca. 75 m of lacustrine sediments that contain tuffaceous lenses but no pumice (1). The upper reaches of the lacustrine unit have produced the endemic island-type Ci Saat fauna, which has just a small number of terrestrial vertebrates including H. erectus (3). Occipital Brn-1996.04 was found some 10 m below the lacustrine unit's top, and is therefore older than 1.51 ± 0.08 Ma.
The second unit comprises ca. 35 m of brackish and marine clays that hold no terrestrial fauna and no pumice. The lowest unit is the Lower Lahar, a ca. 30-m-thick deposit of volcanic breccia. The Lower Lahar unit contains small amounts of epiclastic pumice and a sparse and very fragmentary fauna with no hominins (20). The marine carbonate Puren (Kalibeng) Formation is found below the Lower Lahar.
At the base of Jokotingkir Hill in the central dome, block faulting during the Middle Pleistocene has laterally juxtaposed Bapang, Sangiran, and Puren sediments. In 1978, maxilla S27 (no publication) and calotte S31 (21) were each retrieved without provenance during hill base canal excavations. At this locale, Swisher et al. (18) sampled “A volcanic pumice rich layer [that] crops out 2 m above the horizon that yielded Meganthropus S27 and S31.” Swisher et al. (18) further report a step-heated bulk sample hornblende 40Ar/39Ar age of 1.66 ± 0.04 for this sediment and the fossils.
Based on attempts to replicate Swisher et al.'s (18) procedures, we make two observations. First, if the material analyzed was indeed pumice, it cannot have derived from hominin-bearing lacustrine sediments traditionally termed “Pucangan”—they hold no epiclastic pumice. Second, although there is an epiclastic pumice lens 2 m above the canal bed at the base of Jokotingkir Hill (Jtr-1), it lies fully within a published slumped block of Bapang sediment (1). The sediment is silty and contains no foraminifera, most likely indicating C2a or higher Bapang character. Our 40Ar/39Ar ages (plateau and isotope correlation) for Jtr-1 (Table 2) resemble C3a and C4a ages from the southeast quadrant.
Sémah et al. (22) observe that Swisher et al.'s (18) bulk sample hornblende 40Ar/39Ar age (18) matches their single grain hornblende 40Ar/39Ar age (1.66 ± 0.04 Ma) for the Lower Lahar at Pablengan, 1 km north. Because the Lower Lahar is a massive volcanic breccia, it may hold hornblende of widely varying ages. Sémah et al. (22) also report a single grain age of 1.77 ± 0.04 Ma for this unit (22). Although the Lower Lahar may indeed contain hornblende of highly varying ages, French and American 40Ar/39Ar results on similar dome hornblende diverge consistently (23). In any event, the ages of fossils S27/S31 remain unresolved.
The age of Australasian strewnfield tektites has been refined recently to 0.803 Ma (24). At this age, the tektites should provide a key stratigraphic marker for H. erectus in Southeast Asia (19). Nevertheless, the presence of these objects in the hominin-bearing sediments of Sangiran must be questioned. Tektites are usually found in sediments younger than their own isotopic age (25) and, in the dome, they are commonly found on current erosional surfaces. The first programmed geological excavations in the dome claimed to find two tektites in Bapang sediments; one at Brangkal and the other at Pucung (1). However, detailed documentation was never provided. Moreover, in the last 10 years, programmed fieldwork has been carried out at multicomponent archaeological and paleontological sites at Ngebung (26), at Brangkal, Dayu, and Ngledok (27), and at Sendangbusik (4). Although these more recent excavations have been intensive and meticulous throughout the lower and middle Bapang sequence (C1–C3), they have not recovered tektites. Without stratigraphic confirmation and with mounting evidence for Early Pleistocene-aged hominin-bearing Bapang sediments, it is likely that the tektite level lies in C5b or higher deposits. We suggest that the Australasian event essentially postdates the sedimentary context for the early Sundan hominins.
Conclusions
We have reported a sequence of fluvial sedimentary cycles related to the calc-alkaline eruptions of the Indonesian magmatic arc in the Solo basin of Central Jawa. The sediments, known locally as the Bapang (Kabuh) Formation, constitute the youngest hominin-bearing strata of the Sangiran dome. Each sedimentary cycle has a lower a-facies deposited by highly charged migrating stream channels, and an upper b-facies deposited by quieter overbank sedimentation. In the b-facies, light soil developments, root traces, and pollen diagrams suggest the presence of grassy environments on these floodplains. In the classical taphonomic conundrum, the b-facies overbank settings likely reflect preferred occupation surfaces whereas the a-facies gravels have concentrated paleontological remains into coarser lenses.
We have also reported taphonomic and mineralogical trends, as well as hornblende 40Ar/39Ar ages that closely follow the Sangiran dome stratigraphic sequence. These data reflect a fluvial regime in which pumice was transported from its volcanic source rapidly enough to prevent significant mixing of old and young minerals. In total, the Bapang 40Ar/39Ar ages indicate that H. erectus occupied the Solo basin for at least a half million years beginning 1.5 Ma.
We have also shown that Swisher et al.'s pumice-derived 40Ar/39Ar age of 1.66 ± 0.04 Ma cannot be linked with the S27 and S31 fossils as claimed (18). Nevertheless, the stratigraphically oldest hominin fossil from the southeast quadrant, occipital Brn-1996.04, underlies C1a by about 10 m. As there is a significant erosional break across the dome just below C1a, the age of this specimen and other Sangiran (Pucangan) Formation hominin fossils is greater than 1.5 Ma.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Johan Arif and Sujatmiko aided in fieldwork. E. Arthur Bettis III and Scott Carpenter gave analysis and interpretation. Joe Artz, Megan Ballantyne, Shirley Taylor, Rubén Uribe, and Nancy Zear assisted graphic presentation. The Institute of Technology Bandung and the University of Iowa (UI) collaborated in this research, with assistance from the Indonesian Geological Research and Development Centre and the National Archaeological Research Centre. The Indonesian Institute of Sciences issued permits 7450/V3/KS/1998 and 3174/V3/KS/1999. Funds have come from the UI Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, the UI Central Investment Fund for Research Enhancement, and the UI Foundation Human Evolution Research Fund.
Abbreviations
- Ma
million years ago or million years
- MT
Middle Tuff
- UT
Upper Tuff
- MSWD
mean square of weighted deviates
References
- 1.Itihara M, Sudijono, Kadar D, Shibasaki T, Kumai H, Yoshikawa S, Aziz F, Soeradi T, Wikarno, Kadar A P, et al. In: Quaternary Geology of the Hominid Fossil Bearing Formations in Java. Watanabe N, Kadar D, editors. Bandung, Indonesia: Geological Research and Development Centre Special Publication 4; 1985. pp. 11–43. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sémah A M. Cour Forschungsinst Senckenberg. 1984;69:237–243. [Google Scholar]
- 3.de Vos J, Sondaar P Y, van den Bergh G D, Aziz F. Cour Forschungsinst Senckenberg. 1994;171:129–140. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baba H, Aziz F, Narasaki S, Sudijono, Kaifu Y, Suprijo A, Hyodo M, Susanto E E, Jacob T. J Hum Evol. 2000;38:855–862. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sartono S, Tyler D E, Krantz G S. In: Palaeo-Anthropology: Evolution and Ecology of Homo erectus. Bower J R F, Sartono S, editors. Leiden, The Netherlands: Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation; 1995. pp. 207–210. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Widianto H, Grimaud-Hervé D. C R Acad Sci. 2000;330:883–888. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grimaud-Hervé D, Widianto H, Jacob T H. Acta Anthropol Sinica. 2000;19,Suppl.:64–68. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Indonesia–Japan Joint Research Program. Quaternary Geology of the Northern Foot Area of Mount Lawu and Along the Middle Course of the Solo River, Central and East Java. Bandung, Indonesia: Geological Research and Development Centre and Japan International Cooperation Agency; 1991. pp. 1–83. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pringle M S, Wilson C J N, McWilliams M, Houghton B F, Lanphere M A. Geology. 1992;20:531–534. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Damon P E, Laughlin A W, Percious J K. Radioactive Dating and Methods of Low-Level Counting. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1967. pp. 463–481. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Singer B S, Wijbrans J R, Nelson S T, Pringle M S, Feeley T C, Dungan M A. Geology. 1998;26:427–430. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Deino A, Potts R. J Geophys Res. 1990;95:8453–8470. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mahon K I. Int Geol Rev. 1996;38:293–303. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Swisher C C., III J Hum Evol. 1997;32:A23. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Swisher C C., III . International Symposium on Palaeoanthropology. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing: Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; 1999. p. 78. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Curtis G H. Philos Trans R Soc London B. 1981;292:7–20. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Obradovich J D, Naeser C W. US Geol Surv Prof Pap. 1982;1275:285–286. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Swisher CC, III, Curtis G H, Jacob T, Getty A G, Suprijo A, Widiasmoro Science. 1994;263:1118–1121. doi: 10.1126/science.8108729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Langbroek M, Roebroeks W. J Hum Evol. 2000;38:595–600. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zaim Y, Larick R, Ciochon R L, Suminto, Rizal Y, Sujatmiko Buletin Geologi. 1999;31:67–84. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sartono S. L'Anthropologie (Paris) 1980;18:121–131. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sémah F, Féraud G, Saleki H, Falguères C, Djubiantono T. J Archaeol Sci. 2000;27:763–769. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Larick R, Ciochon R L, Zaim Y, Sudijono, Suminto, Rizal Y, Aziz F. Int J Primatol. 2000;21:731–759. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hou Y, Potts R, Yaun B, Guo Z, Deino A, Wei W, Clark J, Xie G, Huang W. Science. 2000;287:1622–1626. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koeberl C, Glass B P. Science. 2000;289:507a. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5479.507a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sémah F, Sémah A-M, Djubiantono T, Simanjuntak T. J Hum Evol. 1992;23:439–445. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Widianto H, Toha B, Simanjuntak T, Hidayat M. Laporan Penelitian Situs Sangiran: Proses Sedimentasi, Posisi Stratigrafi dan Kronologi Artefak Pada Endapan Purba Seri Kabuh dan Seri Notopuro. Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta, Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Berita Penelitian Arkeologi No. 1; 1997. pp. 1–136. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Widiasmoro . Penyelidikan Pendahuluan Proses Sedimentasi: Fossil Pithecanthropus Sp Didaerah Sangiran, Jawa Tengah. Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Bagian Teknik Geologi; 1977. pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Widianto . Dissertation. Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; 1993. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.